Extend USB 3.0 cable





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







5















I have a couple of new USB 3.0 devices which connect to my USB 3.0 ports via the new "Blue" USB 3.0 cables that end in what looks like a USB 2.0 Type A connector. Indeed, the USB 3.0 devices will also work in the USB 2.0 ports.



So, I have some USB 2.0 extender cables. While I obviously can run the USB 3.0 devices over the USB 2.0 cables, will I be able to get the USB 3.0 speeds or do I need to get the specific USB 3.0 cables - to get the maximum transfer speeds?



It's not the cost - you can get the cables cheap. It's just understanding how the end-to-end system works (and the "in case of emergency - break glass" effect).










share|improve this question































    5















    I have a couple of new USB 3.0 devices which connect to my USB 3.0 ports via the new "Blue" USB 3.0 cables that end in what looks like a USB 2.0 Type A connector. Indeed, the USB 3.0 devices will also work in the USB 2.0 ports.



    So, I have some USB 2.0 extender cables. While I obviously can run the USB 3.0 devices over the USB 2.0 cables, will I be able to get the USB 3.0 speeds or do I need to get the specific USB 3.0 cables - to get the maximum transfer speeds?



    It's not the cost - you can get the cables cheap. It's just understanding how the end-to-end system works (and the "in case of emergency - break glass" effect).










    share|improve this question



























      5












      5








      5


      1






      I have a couple of new USB 3.0 devices which connect to my USB 3.0 ports via the new "Blue" USB 3.0 cables that end in what looks like a USB 2.0 Type A connector. Indeed, the USB 3.0 devices will also work in the USB 2.0 ports.



      So, I have some USB 2.0 extender cables. While I obviously can run the USB 3.0 devices over the USB 2.0 cables, will I be able to get the USB 3.0 speeds or do I need to get the specific USB 3.0 cables - to get the maximum transfer speeds?



      It's not the cost - you can get the cables cheap. It's just understanding how the end-to-end system works (and the "in case of emergency - break glass" effect).










      share|improve this question
















      I have a couple of new USB 3.0 devices which connect to my USB 3.0 ports via the new "Blue" USB 3.0 cables that end in what looks like a USB 2.0 Type A connector. Indeed, the USB 3.0 devices will also work in the USB 2.0 ports.



      So, I have some USB 2.0 extender cables. While I obviously can run the USB 3.0 devices over the USB 2.0 cables, will I be able to get the USB 3.0 speeds or do I need to get the specific USB 3.0 cables - to get the maximum transfer speeds?



      It's not the cost - you can get the cables cheap. It's just understanding how the end-to-end system works (and the "in case of emergency - break glass" effect).







      usb cable usb-3 usb-2






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jul 14 '15 at 2:36









      fixer1234

      19.3k145082




      19.3k145082










      asked Aug 4 '12 at 8:54









      PaoloFCantoniPaoloFCantoni

      83861422




      83861422






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          USB 3.0 is electrically different from USB 2.0 - it has extra connectors/wires designed in such a way as to gracefully plugged into a USB 2.0 connector - they're located on the 'tongue' where there's nothing on a USB 2.0 connector



          enter image description here



          As such connecting a USB 3.0 port to a USB 2.0 extension to a USB 3.0 cable will result in usb 2.0 speed, since the extra connectors will not be connected to anything in the USB 2.0 extension cord on either end.






          share|improve this answer































            3














            Why you can't rely on extending a USB 3.0 cable at all.



            USB 3.0 + USB 2.0 Cables



            There are a number of existing answers that explain how the USB 3.0 cable contains additional wires specific to USB 3.0 high-speed communication, so you can't use a USB 2.0 cable to extend a USB 3.0 connection and retain the speed.



            Full-length USB 3.0 cables + hub



            Jcordeiro's answer goes farther to discuss the problem he experienced trying to use a hub to significantly extend the distance using USB 3.0 cables.



            Multiple USB 3.0 cables to reach 3 meters



            The limitation doesn't end there. You can't even count on combining short USB 3.0 cables to reach the length limit.



            As Jcordeiro's answer mentions, the USB 3.0 standard does not specify a maximum cable length, only that the cable has to meet all of the electrical specifications. The 3 meter limit is based on maximum allowable losses using 26 AWG wire for the high-speed signal wires.



            The spec is concerned with cable flexibility, so it includes a range of recommended wire gauges (there are four types of wires in the cable, each with a different recommended range). For the high-speed signal wires, the recommended range is 26-34 AWG (26 being the largest diameter). The 3 meter limit is based on the largest recommended wire size. If smaller wire is used, the losses will be higher, so the maximum cable length is shorter.



            So if you have several short USB 3.0 cables laying around, particularly if they're thin and flexible, chances are they were made with smaller gauge wire that is perfectly adequate for a short cable. However, they may not support being strung together to make a 3 meter cable that handles USB 3.0 speed.





            The full spec is available here.






            share|improve this answer

































              2














              Well, i have been experimenting with USB 3 and it just made me sad.



              Do not expect to get any USB 3 device working at USB 3 speed with any type of extender.



              As wikipedia says here:




              Unlike previous standards, the USB 3.0 standard does not directly specify a maximum cable length, requiring only that all cables meet an electrical specification: for copper cabling with AWG 26 wires the maximum practical length is 3 meters (9.8 ft)."




              Even a simple change of the usb cable from 50cm to 1.5m may disable the USB 3 speed.



              And even if you put an usb hub, and it says USB 3, when you connect the device it will be connected on the 2.0 fallback hub.



              So if you are considering, extending a single USB 3 from your computer to your desk, i would advise against it.



              Use USB 2 for now, wait a while until decent cables and hubs arrive. (Or USB 3.1 or even USB 4.)






              share|improve this answer

































                1














                To get USB 3.0 speeds you need a USB 3.0 cable because of the extra connectors involved



                Set USB3.0 controller to USB2.0 only






                share|improve this answer


























                • er.. actually, his question involves running USB 3.0 as USB 2.0, rather than cables.

                  – Journeyman Geek
                  Aug 4 '12 at 9:03











                • @Journeyman Geek: Yes, but the answer - which according to Geoff and Joel is what this site is about - gives the solution to My question. Once I'd read the answer I had a closer look at my USB 3 connectors and saw the additional connectors - which, naturally (on the male plug), are not located in the tongue; that's where the original USB 2.0 connectors are. They are located orthogonally to the tongue - in the interstices between and around the original four connectors. But thanks for the picture, it really shows them off well on the socket side.

                  – PaoloFCantoni
                  Aug 5 '12 at 23:49



















                0














                The maximum cable length USB 3.0 supports is reduced to approximately three meters, opposed to five meters with USB 2.0. However, using hubs, the maximum length can be extended to 18 meters.However the pin layout is different and using USB 2.0 Cables will allow maximum transfer of USB 2.0






                share|improve this answer
























                • Thanks. Does that mean if I add a 3m extender to the original 1m cable, I'll get significant speed degradation - or shouldn't I worry about it for that distance?

                  – PaoloFCantoni
                  Aug 5 '12 at 23:51













                • Yes you would definitely get a speed degradation. You would essentially only run at USB2.0 Speeds If you use a USB2 Cable. There are USB3.0 Extenders however.

                  – David Murray
                  Aug 6 '12 at 6:11











                • Hi David, I realise that would be so using a USB 2.0 cable. I meant if I added a 3m USB 3.0 cable. I've got a choice of purchasing 1m, 1.5m or 3m extension cables - I think I really need a 2m one :( 3m would give me the most flexibility, but if it significantly drops the throughput, it would be a simplistic solution.

                  – PaoloFCantoni
                  Aug 7 '12 at 7:35











                • That is correct Paolo, As far as I understand, you would still receive the same data throughput regardless of length. Anything over 3M would need a hub.

                  – David Murray
                  Aug 7 '12 at 10:21













                • OK, but that means if I have a 1m base cable and a 3m extender - giving me 4m overall, then I need a USB 3.0 hub. The point of my question was - I know the Standard says that, but in a practical sense, can I get away with it? Does anybody have any real world experience to suggest that most devices and cables can push the 3m (hubless) out to 4m, perhaps 5m?

                  – PaoloFCantoni
                  Aug 7 '12 at 10:34












                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "3"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f457463%2fextend-usb-3-0-cable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes








                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                6














                USB 3.0 is electrically different from USB 2.0 - it has extra connectors/wires designed in such a way as to gracefully plugged into a USB 2.0 connector - they're located on the 'tongue' where there's nothing on a USB 2.0 connector



                enter image description here



                As such connecting a USB 3.0 port to a USB 2.0 extension to a USB 3.0 cable will result in usb 2.0 speed, since the extra connectors will not be connected to anything in the USB 2.0 extension cord on either end.






                share|improve this answer




























                  6














                  USB 3.0 is electrically different from USB 2.0 - it has extra connectors/wires designed in such a way as to gracefully plugged into a USB 2.0 connector - they're located on the 'tongue' where there's nothing on a USB 2.0 connector



                  enter image description here



                  As such connecting a USB 3.0 port to a USB 2.0 extension to a USB 3.0 cable will result in usb 2.0 speed, since the extra connectors will not be connected to anything in the USB 2.0 extension cord on either end.






                  share|improve this answer


























                    6












                    6








                    6







                    USB 3.0 is electrically different from USB 2.0 - it has extra connectors/wires designed in such a way as to gracefully plugged into a USB 2.0 connector - they're located on the 'tongue' where there's nothing on a USB 2.0 connector



                    enter image description here



                    As such connecting a USB 3.0 port to a USB 2.0 extension to a USB 3.0 cable will result in usb 2.0 speed, since the extra connectors will not be connected to anything in the USB 2.0 extension cord on either end.






                    share|improve this answer













                    USB 3.0 is electrically different from USB 2.0 - it has extra connectors/wires designed in such a way as to gracefully plugged into a USB 2.0 connector - they're located on the 'tongue' where there's nothing on a USB 2.0 connector



                    enter image description here



                    As such connecting a USB 3.0 port to a USB 2.0 extension to a USB 3.0 cable will result in usb 2.0 speed, since the extra connectors will not be connected to anything in the USB 2.0 extension cord on either end.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Aug 4 '12 at 9:00









                    Journeyman GeekJourneyman Geek

                    113k44218372




                    113k44218372

























                        3














                        Why you can't rely on extending a USB 3.0 cable at all.



                        USB 3.0 + USB 2.0 Cables



                        There are a number of existing answers that explain how the USB 3.0 cable contains additional wires specific to USB 3.0 high-speed communication, so you can't use a USB 2.0 cable to extend a USB 3.0 connection and retain the speed.



                        Full-length USB 3.0 cables + hub



                        Jcordeiro's answer goes farther to discuss the problem he experienced trying to use a hub to significantly extend the distance using USB 3.0 cables.



                        Multiple USB 3.0 cables to reach 3 meters



                        The limitation doesn't end there. You can't even count on combining short USB 3.0 cables to reach the length limit.



                        As Jcordeiro's answer mentions, the USB 3.0 standard does not specify a maximum cable length, only that the cable has to meet all of the electrical specifications. The 3 meter limit is based on maximum allowable losses using 26 AWG wire for the high-speed signal wires.



                        The spec is concerned with cable flexibility, so it includes a range of recommended wire gauges (there are four types of wires in the cable, each with a different recommended range). For the high-speed signal wires, the recommended range is 26-34 AWG (26 being the largest diameter). The 3 meter limit is based on the largest recommended wire size. If smaller wire is used, the losses will be higher, so the maximum cable length is shorter.



                        So if you have several short USB 3.0 cables laying around, particularly if they're thin and flexible, chances are they were made with smaller gauge wire that is perfectly adequate for a short cable. However, they may not support being strung together to make a 3 meter cable that handles USB 3.0 speed.





                        The full spec is available here.






                        share|improve this answer






























                          3














                          Why you can't rely on extending a USB 3.0 cable at all.



                          USB 3.0 + USB 2.0 Cables



                          There are a number of existing answers that explain how the USB 3.0 cable contains additional wires specific to USB 3.0 high-speed communication, so you can't use a USB 2.0 cable to extend a USB 3.0 connection and retain the speed.



                          Full-length USB 3.0 cables + hub



                          Jcordeiro's answer goes farther to discuss the problem he experienced trying to use a hub to significantly extend the distance using USB 3.0 cables.



                          Multiple USB 3.0 cables to reach 3 meters



                          The limitation doesn't end there. You can't even count on combining short USB 3.0 cables to reach the length limit.



                          As Jcordeiro's answer mentions, the USB 3.0 standard does not specify a maximum cable length, only that the cable has to meet all of the electrical specifications. The 3 meter limit is based on maximum allowable losses using 26 AWG wire for the high-speed signal wires.



                          The spec is concerned with cable flexibility, so it includes a range of recommended wire gauges (there are four types of wires in the cable, each with a different recommended range). For the high-speed signal wires, the recommended range is 26-34 AWG (26 being the largest diameter). The 3 meter limit is based on the largest recommended wire size. If smaller wire is used, the losses will be higher, so the maximum cable length is shorter.



                          So if you have several short USB 3.0 cables laying around, particularly if they're thin and flexible, chances are they were made with smaller gauge wire that is perfectly adequate for a short cable. However, they may not support being strung together to make a 3 meter cable that handles USB 3.0 speed.





                          The full spec is available here.






                          share|improve this answer




























                            3












                            3








                            3







                            Why you can't rely on extending a USB 3.0 cable at all.



                            USB 3.0 + USB 2.0 Cables



                            There are a number of existing answers that explain how the USB 3.0 cable contains additional wires specific to USB 3.0 high-speed communication, so you can't use a USB 2.0 cable to extend a USB 3.0 connection and retain the speed.



                            Full-length USB 3.0 cables + hub



                            Jcordeiro's answer goes farther to discuss the problem he experienced trying to use a hub to significantly extend the distance using USB 3.0 cables.



                            Multiple USB 3.0 cables to reach 3 meters



                            The limitation doesn't end there. You can't even count on combining short USB 3.0 cables to reach the length limit.



                            As Jcordeiro's answer mentions, the USB 3.0 standard does not specify a maximum cable length, only that the cable has to meet all of the electrical specifications. The 3 meter limit is based on maximum allowable losses using 26 AWG wire for the high-speed signal wires.



                            The spec is concerned with cable flexibility, so it includes a range of recommended wire gauges (there are four types of wires in the cable, each with a different recommended range). For the high-speed signal wires, the recommended range is 26-34 AWG (26 being the largest diameter). The 3 meter limit is based on the largest recommended wire size. If smaller wire is used, the losses will be higher, so the maximum cable length is shorter.



                            So if you have several short USB 3.0 cables laying around, particularly if they're thin and flexible, chances are they were made with smaller gauge wire that is perfectly adequate for a short cable. However, they may not support being strung together to make a 3 meter cable that handles USB 3.0 speed.





                            The full spec is available here.






                            share|improve this answer















                            Why you can't rely on extending a USB 3.0 cable at all.



                            USB 3.0 + USB 2.0 Cables



                            There are a number of existing answers that explain how the USB 3.0 cable contains additional wires specific to USB 3.0 high-speed communication, so you can't use a USB 2.0 cable to extend a USB 3.0 connection and retain the speed.



                            Full-length USB 3.0 cables + hub



                            Jcordeiro's answer goes farther to discuss the problem he experienced trying to use a hub to significantly extend the distance using USB 3.0 cables.



                            Multiple USB 3.0 cables to reach 3 meters



                            The limitation doesn't end there. You can't even count on combining short USB 3.0 cables to reach the length limit.



                            As Jcordeiro's answer mentions, the USB 3.0 standard does not specify a maximum cable length, only that the cable has to meet all of the electrical specifications. The 3 meter limit is based on maximum allowable losses using 26 AWG wire for the high-speed signal wires.



                            The spec is concerned with cable flexibility, so it includes a range of recommended wire gauges (there are four types of wires in the cable, each with a different recommended range). For the high-speed signal wires, the recommended range is 26-34 AWG (26 being the largest diameter). The 3 meter limit is based on the largest recommended wire size. If smaller wire is used, the losses will be higher, so the maximum cable length is shorter.



                            So if you have several short USB 3.0 cables laying around, particularly if they're thin and flexible, chances are they were made with smaller gauge wire that is perfectly adequate for a short cable. However, they may not support being strung together to make a 3 meter cable that handles USB 3.0 speed.





                            The full spec is available here.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Jul 11 '15 at 3:26

























                            answered Jul 10 '15 at 23:58









                            fixer1234fixer1234

                            19.3k145082




                            19.3k145082























                                2














                                Well, i have been experimenting with USB 3 and it just made me sad.



                                Do not expect to get any USB 3 device working at USB 3 speed with any type of extender.



                                As wikipedia says here:




                                Unlike previous standards, the USB 3.0 standard does not directly specify a maximum cable length, requiring only that all cables meet an electrical specification: for copper cabling with AWG 26 wires the maximum practical length is 3 meters (9.8 ft)."




                                Even a simple change of the usb cable from 50cm to 1.5m may disable the USB 3 speed.



                                And even if you put an usb hub, and it says USB 3, when you connect the device it will be connected on the 2.0 fallback hub.



                                So if you are considering, extending a single USB 3 from your computer to your desk, i would advise against it.



                                Use USB 2 for now, wait a while until decent cables and hubs arrive. (Or USB 3.1 or even USB 4.)






                                share|improve this answer






























                                  2














                                  Well, i have been experimenting with USB 3 and it just made me sad.



                                  Do not expect to get any USB 3 device working at USB 3 speed with any type of extender.



                                  As wikipedia says here:




                                  Unlike previous standards, the USB 3.0 standard does not directly specify a maximum cable length, requiring only that all cables meet an electrical specification: for copper cabling with AWG 26 wires the maximum practical length is 3 meters (9.8 ft)."




                                  Even a simple change of the usb cable from 50cm to 1.5m may disable the USB 3 speed.



                                  And even if you put an usb hub, and it says USB 3, when you connect the device it will be connected on the 2.0 fallback hub.



                                  So if you are considering, extending a single USB 3 from your computer to your desk, i would advise against it.



                                  Use USB 2 for now, wait a while until decent cables and hubs arrive. (Or USB 3.1 or even USB 4.)






                                  share|improve this answer




























                                    2












                                    2








                                    2







                                    Well, i have been experimenting with USB 3 and it just made me sad.



                                    Do not expect to get any USB 3 device working at USB 3 speed with any type of extender.



                                    As wikipedia says here:




                                    Unlike previous standards, the USB 3.0 standard does not directly specify a maximum cable length, requiring only that all cables meet an electrical specification: for copper cabling with AWG 26 wires the maximum practical length is 3 meters (9.8 ft)."




                                    Even a simple change of the usb cable from 50cm to 1.5m may disable the USB 3 speed.



                                    And even if you put an usb hub, and it says USB 3, when you connect the device it will be connected on the 2.0 fallback hub.



                                    So if you are considering, extending a single USB 3 from your computer to your desk, i would advise against it.



                                    Use USB 2 for now, wait a while until decent cables and hubs arrive. (Or USB 3.1 or even USB 4.)






                                    share|improve this answer















                                    Well, i have been experimenting with USB 3 and it just made me sad.



                                    Do not expect to get any USB 3 device working at USB 3 speed with any type of extender.



                                    As wikipedia says here:




                                    Unlike previous standards, the USB 3.0 standard does not directly specify a maximum cable length, requiring only that all cables meet an electrical specification: for copper cabling with AWG 26 wires the maximum practical length is 3 meters (9.8 ft)."




                                    Even a simple change of the usb cable from 50cm to 1.5m may disable the USB 3 speed.



                                    And even if you put an usb hub, and it says USB 3, when you connect the device it will be connected on the 2.0 fallback hub.



                                    So if you are considering, extending a single USB 3 from your computer to your desk, i would advise against it.



                                    Use USB 2 for now, wait a while until decent cables and hubs arrive. (Or USB 3.1 or even USB 4.)







                                    share|improve this answer














                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer








                                    edited Mar 4 at 6:22









                                    Gabriel Staples

                                    232111




                                    232111










                                    answered Jan 21 '14 at 14:18









                                    JcordeiroJcordeiro

                                    211




                                    211























                                        1














                                        To get USB 3.0 speeds you need a USB 3.0 cable because of the extra connectors involved



                                        Set USB3.0 controller to USB2.0 only






                                        share|improve this answer


























                                        • er.. actually, his question involves running USB 3.0 as USB 2.0, rather than cables.

                                          – Journeyman Geek
                                          Aug 4 '12 at 9:03











                                        • @Journeyman Geek: Yes, but the answer - which according to Geoff and Joel is what this site is about - gives the solution to My question. Once I'd read the answer I had a closer look at my USB 3 connectors and saw the additional connectors - which, naturally (on the male plug), are not located in the tongue; that's where the original USB 2.0 connectors are. They are located orthogonally to the tongue - in the interstices between and around the original four connectors. But thanks for the picture, it really shows them off well on the socket side.

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 5 '12 at 23:49
















                                        1














                                        To get USB 3.0 speeds you need a USB 3.0 cable because of the extra connectors involved



                                        Set USB3.0 controller to USB2.0 only






                                        share|improve this answer


























                                        • er.. actually, his question involves running USB 3.0 as USB 2.0, rather than cables.

                                          – Journeyman Geek
                                          Aug 4 '12 at 9:03











                                        • @Journeyman Geek: Yes, but the answer - which according to Geoff and Joel is what this site is about - gives the solution to My question. Once I'd read the answer I had a closer look at my USB 3 connectors and saw the additional connectors - which, naturally (on the male plug), are not located in the tongue; that's where the original USB 2.0 connectors are. They are located orthogonally to the tongue - in the interstices between and around the original four connectors. But thanks for the picture, it really shows them off well on the socket side.

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 5 '12 at 23:49














                                        1












                                        1








                                        1







                                        To get USB 3.0 speeds you need a USB 3.0 cable because of the extra connectors involved



                                        Set USB3.0 controller to USB2.0 only






                                        share|improve this answer















                                        To get USB 3.0 speeds you need a USB 3.0 cable because of the extra connectors involved



                                        Set USB3.0 controller to USB2.0 only







                                        share|improve this answer














                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer








                                        edited Mar 20 '17 at 10:16









                                        Community

                                        1




                                        1










                                        answered Aug 4 '12 at 9:01









                                        PaoloFCantoniPaoloFCantoni

                                        83861422




                                        83861422













                                        • er.. actually, his question involves running USB 3.0 as USB 2.0, rather than cables.

                                          – Journeyman Geek
                                          Aug 4 '12 at 9:03











                                        • @Journeyman Geek: Yes, but the answer - which according to Geoff and Joel is what this site is about - gives the solution to My question. Once I'd read the answer I had a closer look at my USB 3 connectors and saw the additional connectors - which, naturally (on the male plug), are not located in the tongue; that's where the original USB 2.0 connectors are. They are located orthogonally to the tongue - in the interstices between and around the original four connectors. But thanks for the picture, it really shows them off well on the socket side.

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 5 '12 at 23:49



















                                        • er.. actually, his question involves running USB 3.0 as USB 2.0, rather than cables.

                                          – Journeyman Geek
                                          Aug 4 '12 at 9:03











                                        • @Journeyman Geek: Yes, but the answer - which according to Geoff and Joel is what this site is about - gives the solution to My question. Once I'd read the answer I had a closer look at my USB 3 connectors and saw the additional connectors - which, naturally (on the male plug), are not located in the tongue; that's where the original USB 2.0 connectors are. They are located orthogonally to the tongue - in the interstices between and around the original four connectors. But thanks for the picture, it really shows them off well on the socket side.

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 5 '12 at 23:49

















                                        er.. actually, his question involves running USB 3.0 as USB 2.0, rather than cables.

                                        – Journeyman Geek
                                        Aug 4 '12 at 9:03





                                        er.. actually, his question involves running USB 3.0 as USB 2.0, rather than cables.

                                        – Journeyman Geek
                                        Aug 4 '12 at 9:03













                                        @Journeyman Geek: Yes, but the answer - which according to Geoff and Joel is what this site is about - gives the solution to My question. Once I'd read the answer I had a closer look at my USB 3 connectors and saw the additional connectors - which, naturally (on the male plug), are not located in the tongue; that's where the original USB 2.0 connectors are. They are located orthogonally to the tongue - in the interstices between and around the original four connectors. But thanks for the picture, it really shows them off well on the socket side.

                                        – PaoloFCantoni
                                        Aug 5 '12 at 23:49





                                        @Journeyman Geek: Yes, but the answer - which according to Geoff and Joel is what this site is about - gives the solution to My question. Once I'd read the answer I had a closer look at my USB 3 connectors and saw the additional connectors - which, naturally (on the male plug), are not located in the tongue; that's where the original USB 2.0 connectors are. They are located orthogonally to the tongue - in the interstices between and around the original four connectors. But thanks for the picture, it really shows them off well on the socket side.

                                        – PaoloFCantoni
                                        Aug 5 '12 at 23:49











                                        0














                                        The maximum cable length USB 3.0 supports is reduced to approximately three meters, opposed to five meters with USB 2.0. However, using hubs, the maximum length can be extended to 18 meters.However the pin layout is different and using USB 2.0 Cables will allow maximum transfer of USB 2.0






                                        share|improve this answer
























                                        • Thanks. Does that mean if I add a 3m extender to the original 1m cable, I'll get significant speed degradation - or shouldn't I worry about it for that distance?

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 5 '12 at 23:51













                                        • Yes you would definitely get a speed degradation. You would essentially only run at USB2.0 Speeds If you use a USB2 Cable. There are USB3.0 Extenders however.

                                          – David Murray
                                          Aug 6 '12 at 6:11











                                        • Hi David, I realise that would be so using a USB 2.0 cable. I meant if I added a 3m USB 3.0 cable. I've got a choice of purchasing 1m, 1.5m or 3m extension cables - I think I really need a 2m one :( 3m would give me the most flexibility, but if it significantly drops the throughput, it would be a simplistic solution.

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 7:35











                                        • That is correct Paolo, As far as I understand, you would still receive the same data throughput regardless of length. Anything over 3M would need a hub.

                                          – David Murray
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 10:21













                                        • OK, but that means if I have a 1m base cable and a 3m extender - giving me 4m overall, then I need a USB 3.0 hub. The point of my question was - I know the Standard says that, but in a practical sense, can I get away with it? Does anybody have any real world experience to suggest that most devices and cables can push the 3m (hubless) out to 4m, perhaps 5m?

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 10:34
















                                        0














                                        The maximum cable length USB 3.0 supports is reduced to approximately three meters, opposed to five meters with USB 2.0. However, using hubs, the maximum length can be extended to 18 meters.However the pin layout is different and using USB 2.0 Cables will allow maximum transfer of USB 2.0






                                        share|improve this answer
























                                        • Thanks. Does that mean if I add a 3m extender to the original 1m cable, I'll get significant speed degradation - or shouldn't I worry about it for that distance?

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 5 '12 at 23:51













                                        • Yes you would definitely get a speed degradation. You would essentially only run at USB2.0 Speeds If you use a USB2 Cable. There are USB3.0 Extenders however.

                                          – David Murray
                                          Aug 6 '12 at 6:11











                                        • Hi David, I realise that would be so using a USB 2.0 cable. I meant if I added a 3m USB 3.0 cable. I've got a choice of purchasing 1m, 1.5m or 3m extension cables - I think I really need a 2m one :( 3m would give me the most flexibility, but if it significantly drops the throughput, it would be a simplistic solution.

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 7:35











                                        • That is correct Paolo, As far as I understand, you would still receive the same data throughput regardless of length. Anything over 3M would need a hub.

                                          – David Murray
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 10:21













                                        • OK, but that means if I have a 1m base cable and a 3m extender - giving me 4m overall, then I need a USB 3.0 hub. The point of my question was - I know the Standard says that, but in a practical sense, can I get away with it? Does anybody have any real world experience to suggest that most devices and cables can push the 3m (hubless) out to 4m, perhaps 5m?

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 10:34














                                        0












                                        0








                                        0







                                        The maximum cable length USB 3.0 supports is reduced to approximately three meters, opposed to five meters with USB 2.0. However, using hubs, the maximum length can be extended to 18 meters.However the pin layout is different and using USB 2.0 Cables will allow maximum transfer of USB 2.0






                                        share|improve this answer













                                        The maximum cable length USB 3.0 supports is reduced to approximately three meters, opposed to five meters with USB 2.0. However, using hubs, the maximum length can be extended to 18 meters.However the pin layout is different and using USB 2.0 Cables will allow maximum transfer of USB 2.0







                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered Aug 4 '12 at 9:01









                                        David MurrayDavid Murray

                                        469410




                                        469410













                                        • Thanks. Does that mean if I add a 3m extender to the original 1m cable, I'll get significant speed degradation - or shouldn't I worry about it for that distance?

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 5 '12 at 23:51













                                        • Yes you would definitely get a speed degradation. You would essentially only run at USB2.0 Speeds If you use a USB2 Cable. There are USB3.0 Extenders however.

                                          – David Murray
                                          Aug 6 '12 at 6:11











                                        • Hi David, I realise that would be so using a USB 2.0 cable. I meant if I added a 3m USB 3.0 cable. I've got a choice of purchasing 1m, 1.5m or 3m extension cables - I think I really need a 2m one :( 3m would give me the most flexibility, but if it significantly drops the throughput, it would be a simplistic solution.

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 7:35











                                        • That is correct Paolo, As far as I understand, you would still receive the same data throughput regardless of length. Anything over 3M would need a hub.

                                          – David Murray
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 10:21













                                        • OK, but that means if I have a 1m base cable and a 3m extender - giving me 4m overall, then I need a USB 3.0 hub. The point of my question was - I know the Standard says that, but in a practical sense, can I get away with it? Does anybody have any real world experience to suggest that most devices and cables can push the 3m (hubless) out to 4m, perhaps 5m?

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 10:34



















                                        • Thanks. Does that mean if I add a 3m extender to the original 1m cable, I'll get significant speed degradation - or shouldn't I worry about it for that distance?

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 5 '12 at 23:51













                                        • Yes you would definitely get a speed degradation. You would essentially only run at USB2.0 Speeds If you use a USB2 Cable. There are USB3.0 Extenders however.

                                          – David Murray
                                          Aug 6 '12 at 6:11











                                        • Hi David, I realise that would be so using a USB 2.0 cable. I meant if I added a 3m USB 3.0 cable. I've got a choice of purchasing 1m, 1.5m or 3m extension cables - I think I really need a 2m one :( 3m would give me the most flexibility, but if it significantly drops the throughput, it would be a simplistic solution.

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 7:35











                                        • That is correct Paolo, As far as I understand, you would still receive the same data throughput regardless of length. Anything over 3M would need a hub.

                                          – David Murray
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 10:21













                                        • OK, but that means if I have a 1m base cable and a 3m extender - giving me 4m overall, then I need a USB 3.0 hub. The point of my question was - I know the Standard says that, but in a practical sense, can I get away with it? Does anybody have any real world experience to suggest that most devices and cables can push the 3m (hubless) out to 4m, perhaps 5m?

                                          – PaoloFCantoni
                                          Aug 7 '12 at 10:34

















                                        Thanks. Does that mean if I add a 3m extender to the original 1m cable, I'll get significant speed degradation - or shouldn't I worry about it for that distance?

                                        – PaoloFCantoni
                                        Aug 5 '12 at 23:51







                                        Thanks. Does that mean if I add a 3m extender to the original 1m cable, I'll get significant speed degradation - or shouldn't I worry about it for that distance?

                                        – PaoloFCantoni
                                        Aug 5 '12 at 23:51















                                        Yes you would definitely get a speed degradation. You would essentially only run at USB2.0 Speeds If you use a USB2 Cable. There are USB3.0 Extenders however.

                                        – David Murray
                                        Aug 6 '12 at 6:11





                                        Yes you would definitely get a speed degradation. You would essentially only run at USB2.0 Speeds If you use a USB2 Cable. There are USB3.0 Extenders however.

                                        – David Murray
                                        Aug 6 '12 at 6:11













                                        Hi David, I realise that would be so using a USB 2.0 cable. I meant if I added a 3m USB 3.0 cable. I've got a choice of purchasing 1m, 1.5m or 3m extension cables - I think I really need a 2m one :( 3m would give me the most flexibility, but if it significantly drops the throughput, it would be a simplistic solution.

                                        – PaoloFCantoni
                                        Aug 7 '12 at 7:35





                                        Hi David, I realise that would be so using a USB 2.0 cable. I meant if I added a 3m USB 3.0 cable. I've got a choice of purchasing 1m, 1.5m or 3m extension cables - I think I really need a 2m one :( 3m would give me the most flexibility, but if it significantly drops the throughput, it would be a simplistic solution.

                                        – PaoloFCantoni
                                        Aug 7 '12 at 7:35













                                        That is correct Paolo, As far as I understand, you would still receive the same data throughput regardless of length. Anything over 3M would need a hub.

                                        – David Murray
                                        Aug 7 '12 at 10:21







                                        That is correct Paolo, As far as I understand, you would still receive the same data throughput regardless of length. Anything over 3M would need a hub.

                                        – David Murray
                                        Aug 7 '12 at 10:21















                                        OK, but that means if I have a 1m base cable and a 3m extender - giving me 4m overall, then I need a USB 3.0 hub. The point of my question was - I know the Standard says that, but in a practical sense, can I get away with it? Does anybody have any real world experience to suggest that most devices and cables can push the 3m (hubless) out to 4m, perhaps 5m?

                                        – PaoloFCantoni
                                        Aug 7 '12 at 10:34





                                        OK, but that means if I have a 1m base cable and a 3m extender - giving me 4m overall, then I need a USB 3.0 hub. The point of my question was - I know the Standard says that, but in a practical sense, can I get away with it? Does anybody have any real world experience to suggest that most devices and cables can push the 3m (hubless) out to 4m, perhaps 5m?

                                        – PaoloFCantoni
                                        Aug 7 '12 at 10:34


















                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f457463%2fextend-usb-3-0-cable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Aardman Animations

                                        Are they similar matrix

                                        “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis