On a version of Urysohn lemma for complete metric spaces, involving uniform continuous functions
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a complete metric space. Let us say that given a subset $Asubseteq X$, a point $ain X$ is a limit point of $A$ if for every $r>0, A cap B(a,r)setminus {a} ne phi$. Now let $A,B$ be disjoint closed subsets of a complete metric space $X$ such that $A,B$ has no limit point in $X$ and also assume that $A,B$ are infinite. Then, does there necessarily exist a uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ such that $d(f(A),f(B)):=inf {|f(a)-f(b)| : ain A, bin B}>0$ ?
general-topology metric-spaces uniform-continuity complete-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a complete metric space. Let us say that given a subset $Asubseteq X$, a point $ain X$ is a limit point of $A$ if for every $r>0, A cap B(a,r)setminus {a} ne phi$. Now let $A,B$ be disjoint closed subsets of a complete metric space $X$ such that $A,B$ has no limit point in $X$ and also assume that $A,B$ are infinite. Then, does there necessarily exist a uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ such that $d(f(A),f(B)):=inf {|f(a)-f(b)| : ain A, bin B}>0$ ?
general-topology metric-spaces uniform-continuity complete-spaces
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You want $A$ and $B$ to only have isolated points?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 28 '18 at 2:16
$begingroup$
@mathworker21: yes exactly right
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 28 '18 at 2:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a complete metric space. Let us say that given a subset $Asubseteq X$, a point $ain X$ is a limit point of $A$ if for every $r>0, A cap B(a,r)setminus {a} ne phi$. Now let $A,B$ be disjoint closed subsets of a complete metric space $X$ such that $A,B$ has no limit point in $X$ and also assume that $A,B$ are infinite. Then, does there necessarily exist a uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ such that $d(f(A),f(B)):=inf {|f(a)-f(b)| : ain A, bin B}>0$ ?
general-topology metric-spaces uniform-continuity complete-spaces
$endgroup$
Let $X$ be a complete metric space. Let us say that given a subset $Asubseteq X$, a point $ain X$ is a limit point of $A$ if for every $r>0, A cap B(a,r)setminus {a} ne phi$. Now let $A,B$ be disjoint closed subsets of a complete metric space $X$ such that $A,B$ has no limit point in $X$ and also assume that $A,B$ are infinite. Then, does there necessarily exist a uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ such that $d(f(A),f(B)):=inf {|f(a)-f(b)| : ain A, bin B}>0$ ?
general-topology metric-spaces uniform-continuity complete-spaces
general-topology metric-spaces uniform-continuity complete-spaces
asked Dec 28 '18 at 2:11
user521337user521337
1,1981417
1,1981417
$begingroup$
You want $A$ and $B$ to only have isolated points?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 28 '18 at 2:16
$begingroup$
@mathworker21: yes exactly right
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 28 '18 at 2:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You want $A$ and $B$ to only have isolated points?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 28 '18 at 2:16
$begingroup$
@mathworker21: yes exactly right
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 28 '18 at 2:28
$begingroup$
You want $A$ and $B$ to only have isolated points?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 28 '18 at 2:16
$begingroup$
You want $A$ and $B$ to only have isolated points?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 28 '18 at 2:16
$begingroup$
@mathworker21: yes exactly right
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 28 '18 at 2:28
$begingroup$
@mathworker21: yes exactly right
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 28 '18 at 2:28
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No. Take $X$ to be the real line, take $A$to be the set of positive integers, and take $B$ to be the set of numbers of the form $n+2^{-n}$ for positive integers $n$. If $f$ is uniformly continuous, then, for any $varepsilon>0$, we'll have $|f(n)-f(n+2^{-n})|<varepsilon$ for all sufficiently large $n$. So the infimum in your question will be zero.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054517%2fon-a-version-of-urysohn-lemma-for-complete-metric-spaces-involving-uniform-cont%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No. Take $X$ to be the real line, take $A$to be the set of positive integers, and take $B$ to be the set of numbers of the form $n+2^{-n}$ for positive integers $n$. If $f$ is uniformly continuous, then, for any $varepsilon>0$, we'll have $|f(n)-f(n+2^{-n})|<varepsilon$ for all sufficiently large $n$. So the infimum in your question will be zero.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No. Take $X$ to be the real line, take $A$to be the set of positive integers, and take $B$ to be the set of numbers of the form $n+2^{-n}$ for positive integers $n$. If $f$ is uniformly continuous, then, for any $varepsilon>0$, we'll have $|f(n)-f(n+2^{-n})|<varepsilon$ for all sufficiently large $n$. So the infimum in your question will be zero.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No. Take $X$ to be the real line, take $A$to be the set of positive integers, and take $B$ to be the set of numbers of the form $n+2^{-n}$ for positive integers $n$. If $f$ is uniformly continuous, then, for any $varepsilon>0$, we'll have $|f(n)-f(n+2^{-n})|<varepsilon$ for all sufficiently large $n$. So the infimum in your question will be zero.
$endgroup$
No. Take $X$ to be the real line, take $A$to be the set of positive integers, and take $B$ to be the set of numbers of the form $n+2^{-n}$ for positive integers $n$. If $f$ is uniformly continuous, then, for any $varepsilon>0$, we'll have $|f(n)-f(n+2^{-n})|<varepsilon$ for all sufficiently large $n$. So the infimum in your question will be zero.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 3:44
Andreas BlassAndreas Blass
50.3k452109
50.3k452109
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054517%2fon-a-version-of-urysohn-lemma-for-complete-metric-spaces-involving-uniform-cont%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You want $A$ and $B$ to only have isolated points?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 28 '18 at 2:16
$begingroup$
@mathworker21: yes exactly right
$endgroup$
– user521337
Dec 28 '18 at 2:28