There are at least 2 vertex-disjoint paths between every pair of vertices?












0












$begingroup$


$G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices and $2n−2$ edges$.$ The edges of G can
be partitioned into two edge-disjoint spanning trees. Which of the
following is NOT true for $G?$




  1. For every subset of $k$ vertices, the induced subgraph has at most $2k−2$ edges.

  2. The minimum cut in $G$ has at least $2$ edges.

  3. There are at least $2$ edge-disjoint paths between every pair of vertices.

  4. There are at least $2$ vertex-disjoint paths between every pair of vertices.




My explained as $:$



Counter for option $4$ is as follows.



Take two copies of $K_4$$($complete graph on 4 vertices$),$$G_1$ and $G_2$.



Let $V(G_1)={1,2,3,4}$ and $V(G_2)={5,6,7,8}$.



Construct a new graph $G_3$ by using these two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ by merging at a vertex, say merge $(4,5)$.



The resultant graph is $2$ edge connected, and of minimum degree $2$ but there exist a cut vertex, the merged vertex.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Please be careful with the tags on questions. This question should not be tagged as computer science. Perhaps you saw it in a CS class? That is not the meaning of the tag - only questions that are directly about computer science should have that tag. This question is purely about mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Mummert
    Jan 30 '16 at 11:21
















0












$begingroup$


$G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices and $2n−2$ edges$.$ The edges of G can
be partitioned into two edge-disjoint spanning trees. Which of the
following is NOT true for $G?$




  1. For every subset of $k$ vertices, the induced subgraph has at most $2k−2$ edges.

  2. The minimum cut in $G$ has at least $2$ edges.

  3. There are at least $2$ edge-disjoint paths between every pair of vertices.

  4. There are at least $2$ vertex-disjoint paths between every pair of vertices.




My explained as $:$



Counter for option $4$ is as follows.



Take two copies of $K_4$$($complete graph on 4 vertices$),$$G_1$ and $G_2$.



Let $V(G_1)={1,2,3,4}$ and $V(G_2)={5,6,7,8}$.



Construct a new graph $G_3$ by using these two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ by merging at a vertex, say merge $(4,5)$.



The resultant graph is $2$ edge connected, and of minimum degree $2$ but there exist a cut vertex, the merged vertex.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Please be careful with the tags on questions. This question should not be tagged as computer science. Perhaps you saw it in a CS class? That is not the meaning of the tag - only questions that are directly about computer science should have that tag. This question is purely about mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Mummert
    Jan 30 '16 at 11:21














0












0








0


2



$begingroup$


$G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices and $2n−2$ edges$.$ The edges of G can
be partitioned into two edge-disjoint spanning trees. Which of the
following is NOT true for $G?$




  1. For every subset of $k$ vertices, the induced subgraph has at most $2k−2$ edges.

  2. The minimum cut in $G$ has at least $2$ edges.

  3. There are at least $2$ edge-disjoint paths between every pair of vertices.

  4. There are at least $2$ vertex-disjoint paths between every pair of vertices.




My explained as $:$



Counter for option $4$ is as follows.



Take two copies of $K_4$$($complete graph on 4 vertices$),$$G_1$ and $G_2$.



Let $V(G_1)={1,2,3,4}$ and $V(G_2)={5,6,7,8}$.



Construct a new graph $G_3$ by using these two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ by merging at a vertex, say merge $(4,5)$.



The resultant graph is $2$ edge connected, and of minimum degree $2$ but there exist a cut vertex, the merged vertex.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




$G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices and $2n−2$ edges$.$ The edges of G can
be partitioned into two edge-disjoint spanning trees. Which of the
following is NOT true for $G?$




  1. For every subset of $k$ vertices, the induced subgraph has at most $2k−2$ edges.

  2. The minimum cut in $G$ has at least $2$ edges.

  3. There are at least $2$ edge-disjoint paths between every pair of vertices.

  4. There are at least $2$ vertex-disjoint paths between every pair of vertices.




My explained as $:$



Counter for option $4$ is as follows.



Take two copies of $K_4$$($complete graph on 4 vertices$),$$G_1$ and $G_2$.



Let $V(G_1)={1,2,3,4}$ and $V(G_2)={5,6,7,8}$.



Construct a new graph $G_3$ by using these two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ by merging at a vertex, say merge $(4,5)$.



The resultant graph is $2$ edge connected, and of minimum degree $2$ but there exist a cut vertex, the merged vertex.







discrete-mathematics graph-theory trees






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 28 '18 at 7:10









Old Pro

304214




304214










asked Oct 17 '15 at 13:02









Mithlesh UpadhyayMithlesh Upadhyay

2,93782969




2,93782969












  • $begingroup$
    Please be careful with the tags on questions. This question should not be tagged as computer science. Perhaps you saw it in a CS class? That is not the meaning of the tag - only questions that are directly about computer science should have that tag. This question is purely about mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Mummert
    Jan 30 '16 at 11:21


















  • $begingroup$
    Please be careful with the tags on questions. This question should not be tagged as computer science. Perhaps you saw it in a CS class? That is not the meaning of the tag - only questions that are directly about computer science should have that tag. This question is purely about mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Mummert
    Jan 30 '16 at 11:21
















$begingroup$
Please be careful with the tags on questions. This question should not be tagged as computer science. Perhaps you saw it in a CS class? That is not the meaning of the tag - only questions that are directly about computer science should have that tag. This question is purely about mathematics.
$endgroup$
– Carl Mummert
Jan 30 '16 at 11:21




$begingroup$
Please be careful with the tags on questions. This question should not be tagged as computer science. Perhaps you saw it in a CS class? That is not the meaning of the tag - only questions that are directly about computer science should have that tag. This question is purely about mathematics.
$endgroup$
– Carl Mummert
Jan 30 '16 at 11:21










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Your construction is indeed a counter-example.

Though I don't see why you argue that by talking about edge-connectivity and minimum degree 2 (which is not the case). What you need to do is show that $G_3$ has $2n - 2$ edges, has $2$ edge disjoint spanning trees, but has a cut vertex.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1484385%2fthere-are-at-least-2-vertex-disjoint-paths-between-every-pair-of-vertices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Your construction is indeed a counter-example.

    Though I don't see why you argue that by talking about edge-connectivity and minimum degree 2 (which is not the case). What you need to do is show that $G_3$ has $2n - 2$ edges, has $2$ edge disjoint spanning trees, but has a cut vertex.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Your construction is indeed a counter-example.

      Though I don't see why you argue that by talking about edge-connectivity and minimum degree 2 (which is not the case). What you need to do is show that $G_3$ has $2n - 2$ edges, has $2$ edge disjoint spanning trees, but has a cut vertex.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Your construction is indeed a counter-example.

        Though I don't see why you argue that by talking about edge-connectivity and minimum degree 2 (which is not the case). What you need to do is show that $G_3$ has $2n - 2$ edges, has $2$ edge disjoint spanning trees, but has a cut vertex.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Your construction is indeed a counter-example.

        Though I don't see why you argue that by talking about edge-connectivity and minimum degree 2 (which is not the case). What you need to do is show that $G_3$ has $2n - 2$ edges, has $2$ edge disjoint spanning trees, but has a cut vertex.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Oct 17 '15 at 14:48









        Manuel LafondManuel Lafond

        2,612716




        2,612716






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1484385%2fthere-are-at-least-2-vertex-disjoint-paths-between-every-pair-of-vertices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix