Is it valid to multiply both sides of an equation by a complex number?
$begingroup$
In case I'd like to get rid of some complex denominators, could I multiply both sides of the equation by the common denominator?
I understand there's an other way, but i'd like to know if the above mentioned would be a valid operation, and if not, why.
algebra-precalculus complex-numbers
edited Dec 29 '18 at 23:14
Eric Wofsey
190k14216348
asked May 24 '17 at 19:49
boribori
62
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In case I'd like to get rid of some complex denominators, could I multiply both sides of the equation by the common denominator?
I understand there's an other way, but i'd like to know if the above mentioned would be a valid operation, and if not, why.
algebra-precalculus complex-numbers
edited Dec 29 '18 at 23:14
Eric Wofsey
190k14216348
asked May 24 '17 at 19:49
boribori
62
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Look up the definition of a FIELD.... $mathbb Q, mathbb R, mathbb C$ are fields. In a field if $zne 0$ then $x=yiff zx=zy.$... And in a field, if $d_1,...,d_n$ are all non-zero then their product $z$ is non-zero.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
May 24 '17 at 20:16
$begingroup$
Thanks @DanielWainfleet, this helps me a lot. I had empiric results, but I wasn't sure how to prove it.
$endgroup$
– bori
May 24 '17 at 20:48
$begingroup$
You can multiply both sides by an elephant as far as anyone cares. If $a = b$ then "doing anything you like to $a$" = "doing the exact same thing to $b$" because $a$ and $b$ are the exact same thing. And if you do something to $a$ you ARE do it to $b$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 29 '18 at 23:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In case I'd like to get rid of some complex denominators, could I multiply both sides of the equation by the common denominator?
I understand there's an other way, but i'd like to know if the above mentioned would be a valid operation, and if not, why.
algebra-precalculus complex-numbers
edited Dec 29 '18 at 23:14
Eric Wofsey
190k14216348
asked May 24 '17 at 19:49
boribori
62
$endgroup$
In case I'd like to get rid of some complex denominators, could I multiply both sides of the equation by the common denominator?
I understand there's an other way, but i'd like to know if the above mentioned would be a valid operation, and if not, why.
algebra-precalculus complex-numbers
algebra-precalculus complex-numbers
edited Dec 29 '18 at 23:14
Eric Wofsey
190k14216348
asked May 24 '17 at 19:49
boribori
62
edited Dec 29 '18 at 23:14
Eric Wofsey
190k14216348
asked May 24 '17 at 19:49
boribori
62
edited Dec 29 '18 at 23:14
Eric Wofsey
190k14216348
edited Dec 29 '18 at 23:14
Eric Wofsey
190k14216348
edited Dec 29 '18 at 23:14
Eric Wofsey
190k14216348
190k14216348
asked May 24 '17 at 19:49
boribori
62
asked May 24 '17 at 19:49
boribori
62
asked May 24 '17 at 19:49
boribori
62
62
$begingroup$
Look up the definition of a FIELD.... $mathbb Q, mathbb R, mathbb C$ are fields. In a field if $zne 0$ then $x=yiff zx=zy.$... And in a field, if $d_1,...,d_n$ are all non-zero then their product $z$ is non-zero.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
May 24 '17 at 20:16
$begingroup$
Thanks @DanielWainfleet, this helps me a lot. I had empiric results, but I wasn't sure how to prove it.
$endgroup$
– bori
May 24 '17 at 20:48
$begingroup$
You can multiply both sides by an elephant as far as anyone cares. If $a = b$ then "doing anything you like to $a$" = "doing the exact same thing to $b$" because $a$ and $b$ are the exact same thing. And if you do something to $a$ you ARE do it to $b$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 29 '18 at 23:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Look up the definition of a FIELD.... $mathbb Q, mathbb R, mathbb C$ are fields. In a field if $zne 0$ then $x=yiff zx=zy.$... And in a field, if $d_1,...,d_n$ are all non-zero then their product $z$ is non-zero.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
May 24 '17 at 20:16
$begingroup$
Thanks @DanielWainfleet, this helps me a lot. I had empiric results, but I wasn't sure how to prove it.
$endgroup$
– bori
May 24 '17 at 20:48
$begingroup$
You can multiply both sides by an elephant as far as anyone cares. If $a = b$ then "doing anything you like to $a$" = "doing the exact same thing to $b$" because $a$ and $b$ are the exact same thing. And if you do something to $a$ you ARE do it to $b$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 29 '18 at 23:23
$begingroup$
Look up the definition of a FIELD.... $mathbb Q, mathbb R, mathbb C$ are fields. In a field if $zne 0$ then $x=yiff zx=zy.$... And in a field, if $d_1,...,d_n$ are all non-zero then their product $z$ is non-zero.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
May 24 '17 at 20:16
$begingroup$
Look up the definition of a FIELD.... $mathbb Q, mathbb R, mathbb C$ are fields. In a field if $zne 0$ then $x=yiff zx=zy.$... And in a field, if $d_1,...,d_n$ are all non-zero then their product $z$ is non-zero.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
May 24 '17 at 20:16
$begingroup$
Thanks @DanielWainfleet, this helps me a lot. I had empiric results, but I wasn't sure how to prove it.
$endgroup$
– bori
May 24 '17 at 20:48
$begingroup$
Thanks @DanielWainfleet, this helps me a lot. I had empiric results, but I wasn't sure how to prove it.
$endgroup$
– bori
May 24 '17 at 20:48
$begingroup$
You can multiply both sides by an elephant as far as anyone cares. If $a = b$ then "doing anything you like to $a$" = "doing the exact same thing to $b$" because $a$ and $b$ are the exact same thing. And if you do something to $a$ you ARE do it to $b$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 29 '18 at 23:23
$begingroup$
You can multiply both sides by an elephant as far as anyone cares. If $a = b$ then "doing anything you like to $a$" = "doing the exact same thing to $b$" because $a$ and $b$ are the exact same thing. And if you do something to $a$ you ARE do it to $b$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 29 '18 at 23:23
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $left(mbox{some expression}right)=left(mbox{another expression}right)$, this means that both expressions evaluate to the same complex number. Let's call this number $z$. This means that:
$$z=left(mbox{some expression}right)=left(mbox{another expression}right)$$
Well, if you want to multiply both sides by another complex, say $w$, the equality will still hold, because both $wcdotleft(mbox{some expression}right)$ and $wcdotleft(mbox{another expression}right)$ are just the same as $wcdot z$.
Beware that if $w$ is $0$ (that is, if you want to multiply both sides by zero), then the equality will still hold: it will be just $0=0$. Of course, this is not useful---you lost all the information you had in your original equation, because you can't divide both sizes by $0$ to get back where you started.
answered May 24 '17 at 20:01
foninifonini
1,79911038
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is perfectly valid as long as the multiplier you use isn't zero.
It's even valid to multiply both sides by a variable expression, but again you must include the proviso that variable multiplier cannot be zero. Many are under the mistaken impression that this is not valid, but it is -- you just have to include the additional assumption to the end.
For example, suppose you have the equation $x=1$. It is perfectly valid to multiply both sides by $x$, with the proviso that $xneq 0$:
$$x=1$$
$$x(x)=x(1)tag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x^2=xtag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x^2-x = 0tag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x(x-1)=0tag{$xneq 0$}$$
This equation appears to have an additional solution -- but don't forget that $x=0$ is not a solution since it is excluded by the proviso.
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
MPWMPW
30.9k12157
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is valid. You can still multiply both sides of an equation by a scalar and still have it hold. It's just like the real numbers.
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
Sean RobersonSean Roberson
6,43531327
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2295356%2fis-it-valid-to-multiply-both-sides-of-an-equation-by-a-complex-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $left(mbox{some expression}right)=left(mbox{another expression}right)$, this means that both expressions evaluate to the same complex number. Let's call this number $z$. This means that:
$$z=left(mbox{some expression}right)=left(mbox{another expression}right)$$
Well, if you want to multiply both sides by another complex, say $w$, the equality will still hold, because both $wcdotleft(mbox{some expression}right)$ and $wcdotleft(mbox{another expression}right)$ are just the same as $wcdot z$.
Beware that if $w$ is $0$ (that is, if you want to multiply both sides by zero), then the equality will still hold: it will be just $0=0$. Of course, this is not useful---you lost all the information you had in your original equation, because you can't divide both sizes by $0$ to get back where you started.
answered May 24 '17 at 20:01
foninifonini
1,79911038
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $left(mbox{some expression}right)=left(mbox{another expression}right)$, this means that both expressions evaluate to the same complex number. Let's call this number $z$. This means that:
$$z=left(mbox{some expression}right)=left(mbox{another expression}right)$$
Well, if you want to multiply both sides by another complex, say $w$, the equality will still hold, because both $wcdotleft(mbox{some expression}right)$ and $wcdotleft(mbox{another expression}right)$ are just the same as $wcdot z$.
Beware that if $w$ is $0$ (that is, if you want to multiply both sides by zero), then the equality will still hold: it will be just $0=0$. Of course, this is not useful---you lost all the information you had in your original equation, because you can't divide both sizes by $0$ to get back where you started.
answered May 24 '17 at 20:01
foninifonini
1,79911038
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $left(mbox{some expression}right)=left(mbox{another expression}right)$, this means that both expressions evaluate to the same complex number. Let's call this number $z$. This means that:
$$z=left(mbox{some expression}right)=left(mbox{another expression}right)$$
Well, if you want to multiply both sides by another complex, say $w$, the equality will still hold, because both $wcdotleft(mbox{some expression}right)$ and $wcdotleft(mbox{another expression}right)$ are just the same as $wcdot z$.
Beware that if $w$ is $0$ (that is, if you want to multiply both sides by zero), then the equality will still hold: it will be just $0=0$. Of course, this is not useful---you lost all the information you had in your original equation, because you can't divide both sizes by $0$ to get back where you started.
answered May 24 '17 at 20:01
foninifonini
1,79911038
$endgroup$
If $left(mbox{some expression}right)=left(mbox{another expression}right)$, this means that both expressions evaluate to the same complex number. Let's call this number $z$. This means that:
$$z=left(mbox{some expression}right)=left(mbox{another expression}right)$$
Well, if you want to multiply both sides by another complex, say $w$, the equality will still hold, because both $wcdotleft(mbox{some expression}right)$ and $wcdotleft(mbox{another expression}right)$ are just the same as $wcdot z$.
Beware that if $w$ is $0$ (that is, if you want to multiply both sides by zero), then the equality will still hold: it will be just $0=0$. Of course, this is not useful---you lost all the information you had in your original equation, because you can't divide both sizes by $0$ to get back where you started.
answered May 24 '17 at 20:01
foninifonini
1,79911038
answered May 24 '17 at 20:01
foninifonini
1,79911038
answered May 24 '17 at 20:01
foninifonini
1,79911038
answered May 24 '17 at 20:01
foninifonini
1,79911038
1,79911038
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is perfectly valid as long as the multiplier you use isn't zero.
It's even valid to multiply both sides by a variable expression, but again you must include the proviso that variable multiplier cannot be zero. Many are under the mistaken impression that this is not valid, but it is -- you just have to include the additional assumption to the end.
For example, suppose you have the equation $x=1$. It is perfectly valid to multiply both sides by $x$, with the proviso that $xneq 0$:
$$x=1$$
$$x(x)=x(1)tag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x^2=xtag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x^2-x = 0tag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x(x-1)=0tag{$xneq 0$}$$
This equation appears to have an additional solution -- but don't forget that $x=0$ is not a solution since it is excluded by the proviso.
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
MPWMPW
30.9k12157
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is perfectly valid as long as the multiplier you use isn't zero.
It's even valid to multiply both sides by a variable expression, but again you must include the proviso that variable multiplier cannot be zero. Many are under the mistaken impression that this is not valid, but it is -- you just have to include the additional assumption to the end.
For example, suppose you have the equation $x=1$. It is perfectly valid to multiply both sides by $x$, with the proviso that $xneq 0$:
$$x=1$$
$$x(x)=x(1)tag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x^2=xtag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x^2-x = 0tag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x(x-1)=0tag{$xneq 0$}$$
This equation appears to have an additional solution -- but don't forget that $x=0$ is not a solution since it is excluded by the proviso.
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
MPWMPW
30.9k12157
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is perfectly valid as long as the multiplier you use isn't zero.
It's even valid to multiply both sides by a variable expression, but again you must include the proviso that variable multiplier cannot be zero. Many are under the mistaken impression that this is not valid, but it is -- you just have to include the additional assumption to the end.
For example, suppose you have the equation $x=1$. It is perfectly valid to multiply both sides by $x$, with the proviso that $xneq 0$:
$$x=1$$
$$x(x)=x(1)tag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x^2=xtag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x^2-x = 0tag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x(x-1)=0tag{$xneq 0$}$$
This equation appears to have an additional solution -- but don't forget that $x=0$ is not a solution since it is excluded by the proviso.
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
MPWMPW
30.9k12157
$endgroup$
It is perfectly valid as long as the multiplier you use isn't zero.
It's even valid to multiply both sides by a variable expression, but again you must include the proviso that variable multiplier cannot be zero. Many are under the mistaken impression that this is not valid, but it is -- you just have to include the additional assumption to the end.
For example, suppose you have the equation $x=1$. It is perfectly valid to multiply both sides by $x$, with the proviso that $xneq 0$:
$$x=1$$
$$x(x)=x(1)tag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x^2=xtag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x^2-x = 0tag{$xneq 0$}$$
$$x(x-1)=0tag{$xneq 0$}$$
This equation appears to have an additional solution -- but don't forget that $x=0$ is not a solution since it is excluded by the proviso.
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
MPWMPW
30.9k12157
edited May 24 '17 at 20:00
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
MPWMPW
30.9k12157
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
MPWMPW
30.9k12157
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
MPWMPW
30.9k12157
30.9k12157
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is valid. You can still multiply both sides of an equation by a scalar and still have it hold. It's just like the real numbers.
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
Sean RobersonSean Roberson
6,43531327
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is valid. You can still multiply both sides of an equation by a scalar and still have it hold. It's just like the real numbers.
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
Sean RobersonSean Roberson
6,43531327
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is valid. You can still multiply both sides of an equation by a scalar and still have it hold. It's just like the real numbers.
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
Sean RobersonSean Roberson
6,43531327
$endgroup$
This is valid. You can still multiply both sides of an equation by a scalar and still have it hold. It's just like the real numbers.
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
Sean RobersonSean Roberson
6,43531327
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
Sean RobersonSean Roberson
6,43531327
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
Sean RobersonSean Roberson
6,43531327
answered May 24 '17 at 19:53
Sean RobersonSean Roberson
6,43531327
6,43531327
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2295356%2fis-it-valid-to-multiply-both-sides-of-an-equation-by-a-complex-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Look up the definition of a FIELD.... $mathbb Q, mathbb R, mathbb C$ are fields. In a field if $zne 0$ then $x=yiff zx=zy.$... And in a field, if $d_1,...,d_n$ are all non-zero then their product $z$ is non-zero.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
May 24 '17 at 20:16
$begingroup$
Thanks @DanielWainfleet, this helps me a lot. I had empiric results, but I wasn't sure how to prove it.
$endgroup$
– bori
May 24 '17 at 20:48
$begingroup$
You can multiply both sides by an elephant as far as anyone cares. If $a = b$ then "doing anything you like to $a$" = "doing the exact same thing to $b$" because $a$ and $b$ are the exact same thing. And if you do something to $a$ you ARE do it to $b$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 29 '18 at 23:23