Are there any minor extensions of Dirichlet's theorem?












1












$begingroup$


For example, can we say that for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $a+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$ with $gcd(a,b)=1$?



How about for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $1+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mustafa Said
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:32










  • $begingroup$
    Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:33


















1












$begingroup$


For example, can we say that for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $a+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$ with $gcd(a,b)=1$?



How about for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $1+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mustafa Said
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:32










  • $begingroup$
    Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:33
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


For example, can we say that for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $a+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$ with $gcd(a,b)=1$?



How about for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $1+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




For example, can we say that for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $a+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$ with $gcd(a,b)=1$?



How about for $k$ $odd$, there are infinitely many primes of the form $1+bk$, for a fixed $a,b$?







elementary-number-theory dirichlet-series






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 30 '18 at 2:27









Tejas RaoTejas Rao

33711




33711








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mustafa Said
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:32










  • $begingroup$
    Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:33
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mustafa Said
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:32










  • $begingroup$
    Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Dec 30 '18 at 2:33










1




1




$begingroup$
I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
$endgroup$
– Mustafa Said
Dec 30 '18 at 2:32




$begingroup$
I would suggest that you go over Dirichlet's proof and see if you can modify it to work for $a=1$.
$endgroup$
– Mustafa Said
Dec 30 '18 at 2:32












$begingroup$
Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 2:33






$begingroup$
Note that for either case, for $k$ being odd, there won't be infinitely many primes if $a$ and $b$ are both odd as $a + bk$ will then always be even.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Dec 30 '18 at 2:33












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

For certain cases, you can say that $k$ must be odd, but it doesn't really add any restriction. For example, if $a$ is even and $b$ is odd, with $gcd left(a, bright) = 1$, then $k$ must be odd for $a + bk$ to be a prime, except from the one possible case of $2$. Apart from such relatively basic cases, I don't believe there is much more that restricting $k$ to be odd, or just $1$, will do. Nonetheless, I agree with Mustafa Said that you may wish to check Dirichlet's proof (e.g., do an online search about any extensions to it) to see about this yourself.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056458%2fare-there-any-minor-extensions-of-dirichlets-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    For certain cases, you can say that $k$ must be odd, but it doesn't really add any restriction. For example, if $a$ is even and $b$ is odd, with $gcd left(a, bright) = 1$, then $k$ must be odd for $a + bk$ to be a prime, except from the one possible case of $2$. Apart from such relatively basic cases, I don't believe there is much more that restricting $k$ to be odd, or just $1$, will do. Nonetheless, I agree with Mustafa Said that you may wish to check Dirichlet's proof (e.g., do an online search about any extensions to it) to see about this yourself.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      For certain cases, you can say that $k$ must be odd, but it doesn't really add any restriction. For example, if $a$ is even and $b$ is odd, with $gcd left(a, bright) = 1$, then $k$ must be odd for $a + bk$ to be a prime, except from the one possible case of $2$. Apart from such relatively basic cases, I don't believe there is much more that restricting $k$ to be odd, or just $1$, will do. Nonetheless, I agree with Mustafa Said that you may wish to check Dirichlet's proof (e.g., do an online search about any extensions to it) to see about this yourself.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        For certain cases, you can say that $k$ must be odd, but it doesn't really add any restriction. For example, if $a$ is even and $b$ is odd, with $gcd left(a, bright) = 1$, then $k$ must be odd for $a + bk$ to be a prime, except from the one possible case of $2$. Apart from such relatively basic cases, I don't believe there is much more that restricting $k$ to be odd, or just $1$, will do. Nonetheless, I agree with Mustafa Said that you may wish to check Dirichlet's proof (e.g., do an online search about any extensions to it) to see about this yourself.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        For certain cases, you can say that $k$ must be odd, but it doesn't really add any restriction. For example, if $a$ is even and $b$ is odd, with $gcd left(a, bright) = 1$, then $k$ must be odd for $a + bk$ to be a prime, except from the one possible case of $2$. Apart from such relatively basic cases, I don't believe there is much more that restricting $k$ to be odd, or just $1$, will do. Nonetheless, I agree with Mustafa Said that you may wish to check Dirichlet's proof (e.g., do an online search about any extensions to it) to see about this yourself.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 30 '18 at 4:05

























        answered Dec 30 '18 at 2:38









        John OmielanJohn Omielan

        4,1691215




        4,1691215






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056458%2fare-there-any-minor-extensions-of-dirichlets-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix