How can I prove that $mathbb Q times mathbb Q$ is connected?












0












$begingroup$


How can I prove that $mathbb Q times mathbb Q$ is connected? I was trying to prove that it isn't because $mathbb Q$ is not connected but I can't find two open $A,B$ to prove it.






general-topology connectedness







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I´m new in it and my english level isn´t the best. $Q$ are the rational numbers. And they are not connected. But I have to demostrate that $Q$X$Q$ are or not connected. I was trying to prove that it isn´t connected but I couldn´t find any open partition for prove it. That´s why I think it´s connected but I don´t know who can I prove it.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Meliodas Use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html to help yourself with tex commands.
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfgang
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:19












  • $begingroup$
    thank you very much, I will use it.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    This is definitely not the best way to prove that $Bbb Q^2$ is not connected, but it might be a useful fact to know anyway: $Bbb Q^2$ and $Bbb Q$ are homeomorphic, so in particular the former is disconnected since the latter is
    $endgroup$
    – Alessandro Codenotti
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:44
















0












$begingroup$


How can I prove that $mathbb Q times mathbb Q$ is connected? I was trying to prove that it isn't because $mathbb Q$ is not connected but I can't find two open $A,B$ to prove it.






general-topology connectedness







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I´m new in it and my english level isn´t the best. $Q$ are the rational numbers. And they are not connected. But I have to demostrate that $Q$X$Q$ are or not connected. I was trying to prove that it isn´t connected but I couldn´t find any open partition for prove it. That´s why I think it´s connected but I don´t know who can I prove it.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Meliodas Use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html to help yourself with tex commands.
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfgang
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:19












  • $begingroup$
    thank you very much, I will use it.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    This is definitely not the best way to prove that $Bbb Q^2$ is not connected, but it might be a useful fact to know anyway: $Bbb Q^2$ and $Bbb Q$ are homeomorphic, so in particular the former is disconnected since the latter is
    $endgroup$
    – Alessandro Codenotti
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:44














0












0








0





$begingroup$


How can I prove that $mathbb Q times mathbb Q$ is connected? I was trying to prove that it isn't because $mathbb Q$ is not connected but I can't find two open $A,B$ to prove it.






general-topology connectedness







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




How can I prove that $mathbb Q times mathbb Q$ is connected? I was trying to prove that it isn't because $mathbb Q$ is not connected but I can't find two open $A,B$ to prove it.






general-topology connectedness




general-topology connectedness






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 24 '18 at 17:46









José Carlos Santos

167k22132235




167k22132235










asked Dec 24 '18 at 17:03









MeliodasMeliodas

215




215












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I´m new in it and my english level isn´t the best. $Q$ are the rational numbers. And they are not connected. But I have to demostrate that $Q$X$Q$ are or not connected. I was trying to prove that it isn´t connected but I couldn´t find any open partition for prove it. That´s why I think it´s connected but I don´t know who can I prove it.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Meliodas Use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html to help yourself with tex commands.
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfgang
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:19












  • $begingroup$
    thank you very much, I will use it.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    This is definitely not the best way to prove that $Bbb Q^2$ is not connected, but it might be a useful fact to know anyway: $Bbb Q^2$ and $Bbb Q$ are homeomorphic, so in particular the former is disconnected since the latter is
    $endgroup$
    – Alessandro Codenotti
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:44


















  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I´m new in it and my english level isn´t the best. $Q$ are the rational numbers. And they are not connected. But I have to demostrate that $Q$X$Q$ are or not connected. I was trying to prove that it isn´t connected but I couldn´t find any open partition for prove it. That´s why I think it´s connected but I don´t know who can I prove it.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Meliodas Use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html to help yourself with tex commands.
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfgang
    Dec 24 '18 at 17:19












  • $begingroup$
    thank you very much, I will use it.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    This is definitely not the best way to prove that $Bbb Q^2$ is not connected, but it might be a useful fact to know anyway: $Bbb Q^2$ and $Bbb Q$ are homeomorphic, so in particular the former is disconnected since the latter is
    $endgroup$
    – Alessandro Codenotti
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:44
















$begingroup$
Sorry, I´m new in it and my english level isn´t the best. $Q$ are the rational numbers. And they are not connected. But I have to demostrate that $Q$X$Q$ are or not connected. I was trying to prove that it isn´t connected but I couldn´t find any open partition for prove it. That´s why I think it´s connected but I don´t know who can I prove it.
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 17:11




$begingroup$
Sorry, I´m new in it and my english level isn´t the best. $Q$ are the rational numbers. And they are not connected. But I have to demostrate that $Q$X$Q$ are or not connected. I was trying to prove that it isn´t connected but I couldn´t find any open partition for prove it. That´s why I think it´s connected but I don´t know who can I prove it.
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 17:11












$begingroup$
@Meliodas Use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html to help yourself with tex commands.
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang
Dec 24 '18 at 17:19






$begingroup$
@Meliodas Use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html to help yourself with tex commands.
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang
Dec 24 '18 at 17:19














$begingroup$
thank you very much, I will use it.
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 18:13




$begingroup$
thank you very much, I will use it.
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 18:13












$begingroup$
This is definitely not the best way to prove that $Bbb Q^2$ is not connected, but it might be a useful fact to know anyway: $Bbb Q^2$ and $Bbb Q$ are homeomorphic, so in particular the former is disconnected since the latter is
$endgroup$
– Alessandro Codenotti
Dec 25 '18 at 16:44




$begingroup$
This is definitely not the best way to prove that $Bbb Q^2$ is not connected, but it might be a useful fact to know anyway: $Bbb Q^2$ and $Bbb Q$ are homeomorphic, so in particular the former is disconnected since the latter is
$endgroup$
– Alessandro Codenotti
Dec 25 '18 at 16:44










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

You know that $mathbb Q$ is not connected. That means that there is a set $Asubsetmathbb Q$ such that $A$ is open and closed in $mathbb Q$ and that furthermore $Aneqemptyset,mathbb Q$. So, consider the set $Atimes A$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yes, is very clear if you use this way.Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:17



















1












$begingroup$

The map $f(x,y)=x$ is continuous on $mathbb R^2.$ If $mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q $ were connected, then $f(mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q)$ would be connected. But $f(mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q)=mathbb Q,$ contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    If f(x,y) continuos then you go of once connected space to another one?
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    If $E$ is connected and $f$ is continuous, then $f(E)$ is connected.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:30










  • $begingroup$
    Perfect,thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:32



















0












$begingroup$

Your initial intuition was correct - $mathbb{Q}^2$ is indeed not connected.



Think about it intuitively. $mathbb{Q}^2$ is basically a bunch of points sprinkled in the plane $mathbb{R}^2$. The easiest way to show that it's disconnected would be to "cut it in half with a line" - that is, find a line $l$ such that $(1)$ there are rational points (= elements of $mathbb{Q}^2$) on both sides of $l$ and $(2)$ there are no rational points actually on $l$ itself.




  • Do you see why this would in fact disconnect $mathbb{Q}^2$?


Now $(1)$ is basically trivial - $mathbb{Q}^2$ is scattered throughout $mathbb{R}^2$ so that there are rational points on both sides of any line. So we're just down to $(2)$: can you think of a line in $mathbb{R}^2$ not containing any rational points? HINT: there's even a horizontal (or vertical, if you prefer) example - think about $pi$ ...)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I understand. I was thinking only in the horizontal of x=0 but if I find one with only irrationals points I have the solution. Thanks for the explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:25










  • $begingroup$
    @Meliodas Yes, and it's not hard to find such a line - do you see how?
    $endgroup$
    – Noah Schweber
    Dec 24 '18 at 19:01










  • $begingroup$
    I thought in x=irrational number. In this way (x,y) don´t belong to rational numbers for all the y of the vertical, Is this enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:29











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051452%2fhow-can-i-prove-that-mathbb-q-times-mathbb-q-is-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

You know that $mathbb Q$ is not connected. That means that there is a set $Asubsetmathbb Q$ such that $A$ is open and closed in $mathbb Q$ and that furthermore $Aneqemptyset,mathbb Q$. So, consider the set $Atimes A$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yes, is very clear if you use this way.Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:17
















4












$begingroup$

You know that $mathbb Q$ is not connected. That means that there is a set $Asubsetmathbb Q$ such that $A$ is open and closed in $mathbb Q$ and that furthermore $Aneqemptyset,mathbb Q$. So, consider the set $Atimes A$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yes, is very clear if you use this way.Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:17














4












4








4





$begingroup$

You know that $mathbb Q$ is not connected. That means that there is a set $Asubsetmathbb Q$ such that $A$ is open and closed in $mathbb Q$ and that furthermore $Aneqemptyset,mathbb Q$. So, consider the set $Atimes A$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You know that $mathbb Q$ is not connected. That means that there is a set $Asubsetmathbb Q$ such that $A$ is open and closed in $mathbb Q$ and that furthermore $Aneqemptyset,mathbb Q$. So, consider the set $Atimes A$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 24 '18 at 17:13









José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

167k22132235




167k22132235












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, is very clear if you use this way.Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:17


















  • $begingroup$
    Yes, is very clear if you use this way.Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:17
















$begingroup$
Yes, is very clear if you use this way.Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 18:17




$begingroup$
Yes, is very clear if you use this way.Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 18:17











1












$begingroup$

The map $f(x,y)=x$ is continuous on $mathbb R^2.$ If $mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q $ were connected, then $f(mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q)$ would be connected. But $f(mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q)=mathbb Q,$ contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    If f(x,y) continuos then you go of once connected space to another one?
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    If $E$ is connected and $f$ is continuous, then $f(E)$ is connected.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:30










  • $begingroup$
    Perfect,thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:32
















1












$begingroup$

The map $f(x,y)=x$ is continuous on $mathbb R^2.$ If $mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q $ were connected, then $f(mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q)$ would be connected. But $f(mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q)=mathbb Q,$ contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    If f(x,y) continuos then you go of once connected space to another one?
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    If $E$ is connected and $f$ is continuous, then $f(E)$ is connected.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:30










  • $begingroup$
    Perfect,thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:32














1












1








1





$begingroup$

The map $f(x,y)=x$ is continuous on $mathbb R^2.$ If $mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q $ were connected, then $f(mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q)$ would be connected. But $f(mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q)=mathbb Q,$ contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The map $f(x,y)=x$ is continuous on $mathbb R^2.$ If $mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q $ were connected, then $f(mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q)$ would be connected. But $f(mathbb Qtimes mathbb Q)=mathbb Q,$ contradiction.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 24 '18 at 17:34









zhw.zhw.

74.1k43175




74.1k43175












  • $begingroup$
    If f(x,y) continuos then you go of once connected space to another one?
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    If $E$ is connected and $f$ is continuous, then $f(E)$ is connected.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:30










  • $begingroup$
    Perfect,thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:32


















  • $begingroup$
    If f(x,y) continuos then you go of once connected space to another one?
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    If $E$ is connected and $f$ is continuous, then $f(E)$ is connected.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:30










  • $begingroup$
    Perfect,thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:32
















$begingroup$
If f(x,y) continuos then you go of once connected space to another one?
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 18:21




$begingroup$
If f(x,y) continuos then you go of once connected space to another one?
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 18:21












$begingroup$
If $E$ is connected and $f$ is continuous, then $f(E)$ is connected.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 24 '18 at 18:30




$begingroup$
If $E$ is connected and $f$ is continuous, then $f(E)$ is connected.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 24 '18 at 18:30












$begingroup$
Perfect,thanks!
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 18:32




$begingroup$
Perfect,thanks!
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 18:32











0












$begingroup$

Your initial intuition was correct - $mathbb{Q}^2$ is indeed not connected.



Think about it intuitively. $mathbb{Q}^2$ is basically a bunch of points sprinkled in the plane $mathbb{R}^2$. The easiest way to show that it's disconnected would be to "cut it in half with a line" - that is, find a line $l$ such that $(1)$ there are rational points (= elements of $mathbb{Q}^2$) on both sides of $l$ and $(2)$ there are no rational points actually on $l$ itself.




  • Do you see why this would in fact disconnect $mathbb{Q}^2$?


Now $(1)$ is basically trivial - $mathbb{Q}^2$ is scattered throughout $mathbb{R}^2$ so that there are rational points on both sides of any line. So we're just down to $(2)$: can you think of a line in $mathbb{R}^2$ not containing any rational points? HINT: there's even a horizontal (or vertical, if you prefer) example - think about $pi$ ...)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I understand. I was thinking only in the horizontal of x=0 but if I find one with only irrationals points I have the solution. Thanks for the explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:25










  • $begingroup$
    @Meliodas Yes, and it's not hard to find such a line - do you see how?
    $endgroup$
    – Noah Schweber
    Dec 24 '18 at 19:01










  • $begingroup$
    I thought in x=irrational number. In this way (x,y) don´t belong to rational numbers for all the y of the vertical, Is this enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:29
















0












$begingroup$

Your initial intuition was correct - $mathbb{Q}^2$ is indeed not connected.



Think about it intuitively. $mathbb{Q}^2$ is basically a bunch of points sprinkled in the plane $mathbb{R}^2$. The easiest way to show that it's disconnected would be to "cut it in half with a line" - that is, find a line $l$ such that $(1)$ there are rational points (= elements of $mathbb{Q}^2$) on both sides of $l$ and $(2)$ there are no rational points actually on $l$ itself.




  • Do you see why this would in fact disconnect $mathbb{Q}^2$?


Now $(1)$ is basically trivial - $mathbb{Q}^2$ is scattered throughout $mathbb{R}^2$ so that there are rational points on both sides of any line. So we're just down to $(2)$: can you think of a line in $mathbb{R}^2$ not containing any rational points? HINT: there's even a horizontal (or vertical, if you prefer) example - think about $pi$ ...)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I understand. I was thinking only in the horizontal of x=0 but if I find one with only irrationals points I have the solution. Thanks for the explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:25










  • $begingroup$
    @Meliodas Yes, and it's not hard to find such a line - do you see how?
    $endgroup$
    – Noah Schweber
    Dec 24 '18 at 19:01










  • $begingroup$
    I thought in x=irrational number. In this way (x,y) don´t belong to rational numbers for all the y of the vertical, Is this enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:29














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Your initial intuition was correct - $mathbb{Q}^2$ is indeed not connected.



Think about it intuitively. $mathbb{Q}^2$ is basically a bunch of points sprinkled in the plane $mathbb{R}^2$. The easiest way to show that it's disconnected would be to "cut it in half with a line" - that is, find a line $l$ such that $(1)$ there are rational points (= elements of $mathbb{Q}^2$) on both sides of $l$ and $(2)$ there are no rational points actually on $l$ itself.




  • Do you see why this would in fact disconnect $mathbb{Q}^2$?


Now $(1)$ is basically trivial - $mathbb{Q}^2$ is scattered throughout $mathbb{R}^2$ so that there are rational points on both sides of any line. So we're just down to $(2)$: can you think of a line in $mathbb{R}^2$ not containing any rational points? HINT: there's even a horizontal (or vertical, if you prefer) example - think about $pi$ ...)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Your initial intuition was correct - $mathbb{Q}^2$ is indeed not connected.



Think about it intuitively. $mathbb{Q}^2$ is basically a bunch of points sprinkled in the plane $mathbb{R}^2$. The easiest way to show that it's disconnected would be to "cut it in half with a line" - that is, find a line $l$ such that $(1)$ there are rational points (= elements of $mathbb{Q}^2$) on both sides of $l$ and $(2)$ there are no rational points actually on $l$ itself.




  • Do you see why this would in fact disconnect $mathbb{Q}^2$?


Now $(1)$ is basically trivial - $mathbb{Q}^2$ is scattered throughout $mathbb{R}^2$ so that there are rational points on both sides of any line. So we're just down to $(2)$: can you think of a line in $mathbb{R}^2$ not containing any rational points? HINT: there's even a horizontal (or vertical, if you prefer) example - think about $pi$ ...)







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 24 '18 at 17:52









Noah SchweberNoah Schweber

127k10151290




127k10151290












  • $begingroup$
    I understand. I was thinking only in the horizontal of x=0 but if I find one with only irrationals points I have the solution. Thanks for the explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:25










  • $begingroup$
    @Meliodas Yes, and it's not hard to find such a line - do you see how?
    $endgroup$
    – Noah Schweber
    Dec 24 '18 at 19:01










  • $begingroup$
    I thought in x=irrational number. In this way (x,y) don´t belong to rational numbers for all the y of the vertical, Is this enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:29


















  • $begingroup$
    I understand. I was thinking only in the horizontal of x=0 but if I find one with only irrationals points I have the solution. Thanks for the explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 24 '18 at 18:25










  • $begingroup$
    @Meliodas Yes, and it's not hard to find such a line - do you see how?
    $endgroup$
    – Noah Schweber
    Dec 24 '18 at 19:01










  • $begingroup$
    I thought in x=irrational number. In this way (x,y) don´t belong to rational numbers for all the y of the vertical, Is this enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Meliodas
    Dec 25 '18 at 16:29
















$begingroup$
I understand. I was thinking only in the horizontal of x=0 but if I find one with only irrationals points I have the solution. Thanks for the explanation.
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 18:25




$begingroup$
I understand. I was thinking only in the horizontal of x=0 but if I find one with only irrationals points I have the solution. Thanks for the explanation.
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 24 '18 at 18:25












$begingroup$
@Meliodas Yes, and it's not hard to find such a line - do you see how?
$endgroup$
– Noah Schweber
Dec 24 '18 at 19:01




$begingroup$
@Meliodas Yes, and it's not hard to find such a line - do you see how?
$endgroup$
– Noah Schweber
Dec 24 '18 at 19:01












$begingroup$
I thought in x=irrational number. In this way (x,y) don´t belong to rational numbers for all the y of the vertical, Is this enough?
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 25 '18 at 16:29




$begingroup$
I thought in x=irrational number. In this way (x,y) don´t belong to rational numbers for all the y of the vertical, Is this enough?
$endgroup$
– Meliodas
Dec 25 '18 at 16:29


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051452%2fhow-can-i-prove-that-mathbb-q-times-mathbb-q-is-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

Image
up vote 4 down vote favorite 1 Some time ago, I set up skydrive for my wife on her mac. But now she wants to access the files online, I cannot remember what Microsoft account I setup and linked her skydive app to and nor can I see anything in the skydrive app settings to tell me either? How can I see the name of the Microsoft account the skydive app is currently linked to? I would like to know this for skydrive app for Mac and PC onedrive share | improve this question asked Feb 25 '13 at 4:52 Gary Barrett 260 2 5 12
Read more

When does type information flow backwards in C++?

Image
up vote 62 down vote favorite 19 I just watched Stephan T. Lavavej talk at CppCon 2018 on "Class Template Argument Deduction", where at some point he incidentally says: In C++ type information almost never flows backwards ... I had to say "almost" because there's one or two cases, possibly more but very few . Despite trying to figure out which cases he might be referring to, I couldn't come up with anything. Hence the question: In which cases the C++17 standard mandates that type information propagate backwards? c++ language-lawyer c++17 share | improve this question edited 7 hours ago scohe0
Read more

Grease: Live!

Image
A tradução deste artigo está abaixo da qualidade média aceitável. É possível que tenha sido feita por um tradutor automático ou por alguém que não conhece bem o português ou a língua original do texto. Caso queira colaborar com a Wikipédia, tente encontrar a página original e melhore este verbete conforme o guia de tradução. Grease: Live! Grease: Live!  (PRT/BRA)  Estados Unidos 2016 •   cor •   130 min. min   Direção Thomas Kail Alex Rudzinski Produção Marc Platt Adam Siegel Roteiro Allan Carr Robert Cary Warren Casey Jim Jacobs Jonathan Tolins Bronte Woodard Baseado em Grease (musical) Grease (filme) Elenco Julianne Hough Aaron Tveit Vanessa Hudgens Carlos Pena Jr. Keke Palmer Carly Rae Jepsen Kether Donohue Jordan Fisher David Del Rio Andrew Call Gênero Musical Música Tom Kitt Figurino William Ivey Long Companhia(s) produtora(s) Warner Bros. Studios Distribuição Fox Lançamento 31 de Janei
Read more