Does the system of equations a + b, a * b provide a one-to-one correspondence between ordered and unordered...












2












$begingroup$


Let's write ordered sets as $[a,b,c,...]$ and ${a,b,c,...}$ for unordered sets.



Now let $f(a,b)=[a+b,a b]$. Note $f(a,b)=f(b,a).$



Consider $g([x,y])={a,b}$ where $a+b=x,a b=y$.



Mathematica's Solve function came up with $left{frac{1}{2} left(x-sqrt{x^2-4 y}right),frac{1}{2} left(sqrt{x^2-4 y}+xright)right}$ as the value of ${a,b}$ given $[x,y]$, and in my testing, it worked for everything I threw at it. (On a philosophical note it is interesting that just from the definitions provided there's no implied order for $a$ and $b$ given $[x,y]$.)



Is this a correct one-to-one correspondence from ordered sets of two elements to unordered sets of two elements in the domain of imaginary numbers? If so, does it have a name? I'd like to find out more about it.



As an aside, the one element and three element cases seem to work also. Mathematica spent a long time trying to find equations for my guess at the four element case $a+b+c+d,a b+a c+a d+b c+b d+c d,a b c+a b d+a c d+b c d,a b c d$, but eventually I aborted it. I suspect if there is a solution, it might generalize to $n$ elements.



Also, I think it works with ordered lists and unordered lists.



Many thanks!



Edit: as DanielWainfleet points out in the comments "if $x^2=4y$ then $g([x,y])={x/2}$ which has only one element. So the above can't go from ordered sets of two elements to unordered sets of two elements.



So I'd like to revise the question to the highly related case of including sets of one OR two elements (unordered sets stay at two elements).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What does $g([x,y])={a,b}$ mean here? The way I would usually interpret it doesn't seem to be what you mean.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:13










  • $begingroup$
    It means that $g$ is a function from an unordered set $[x,y]$ to a set ${a,b}$. Maybe $g:[x,y]mapsto{a,b}$ is more correct. As for symmetric polynomials, they look highly related, but I'm not seeing this particular application.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Spaeth
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:54












  • $begingroup$
    (Side note: the above should read "It's supposed to mean...". I didn't mean to imply that was a reasonable way of writing that.)
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Spaeth
    Jun 17 '17 at 1:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If $x^2=4y$ then $g([x,y]) ={x/2}$ has only $1$ member.
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jun 17 '17 at 2:04
















2












$begingroup$


Let's write ordered sets as $[a,b,c,...]$ and ${a,b,c,...}$ for unordered sets.



Now let $f(a,b)=[a+b,a b]$. Note $f(a,b)=f(b,a).$



Consider $g([x,y])={a,b}$ where $a+b=x,a b=y$.



Mathematica's Solve function came up with $left{frac{1}{2} left(x-sqrt{x^2-4 y}right),frac{1}{2} left(sqrt{x^2-4 y}+xright)right}$ as the value of ${a,b}$ given $[x,y]$, and in my testing, it worked for everything I threw at it. (On a philosophical note it is interesting that just from the definitions provided there's no implied order for $a$ and $b$ given $[x,y]$.)



Is this a correct one-to-one correspondence from ordered sets of two elements to unordered sets of two elements in the domain of imaginary numbers? If so, does it have a name? I'd like to find out more about it.



As an aside, the one element and three element cases seem to work also. Mathematica spent a long time trying to find equations for my guess at the four element case $a+b+c+d,a b+a c+a d+b c+b d+c d,a b c+a b d+a c d+b c d,a b c d$, but eventually I aborted it. I suspect if there is a solution, it might generalize to $n$ elements.



Also, I think it works with ordered lists and unordered lists.



Many thanks!



Edit: as DanielWainfleet points out in the comments "if $x^2=4y$ then $g([x,y])={x/2}$ which has only one element. So the above can't go from ordered sets of two elements to unordered sets of two elements.



So I'd like to revise the question to the highly related case of including sets of one OR two elements (unordered sets stay at two elements).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What does $g([x,y])={a,b}$ mean here? The way I would usually interpret it doesn't seem to be what you mean.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:13










  • $begingroup$
    It means that $g$ is a function from an unordered set $[x,y]$ to a set ${a,b}$. Maybe $g:[x,y]mapsto{a,b}$ is more correct. As for symmetric polynomials, they look highly related, but I'm not seeing this particular application.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Spaeth
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:54












  • $begingroup$
    (Side note: the above should read "It's supposed to mean...". I didn't mean to imply that was a reasonable way of writing that.)
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Spaeth
    Jun 17 '17 at 1:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If $x^2=4y$ then $g([x,y]) ={x/2}$ has only $1$ member.
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jun 17 '17 at 2:04














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let's write ordered sets as $[a,b,c,...]$ and ${a,b,c,...}$ for unordered sets.



Now let $f(a,b)=[a+b,a b]$. Note $f(a,b)=f(b,a).$



Consider $g([x,y])={a,b}$ where $a+b=x,a b=y$.



Mathematica's Solve function came up with $left{frac{1}{2} left(x-sqrt{x^2-4 y}right),frac{1}{2} left(sqrt{x^2-4 y}+xright)right}$ as the value of ${a,b}$ given $[x,y]$, and in my testing, it worked for everything I threw at it. (On a philosophical note it is interesting that just from the definitions provided there's no implied order for $a$ and $b$ given $[x,y]$.)



Is this a correct one-to-one correspondence from ordered sets of two elements to unordered sets of two elements in the domain of imaginary numbers? If so, does it have a name? I'd like to find out more about it.



As an aside, the one element and three element cases seem to work also. Mathematica spent a long time trying to find equations for my guess at the four element case $a+b+c+d,a b+a c+a d+b c+b d+c d,a b c+a b d+a c d+b c d,a b c d$, but eventually I aborted it. I suspect if there is a solution, it might generalize to $n$ elements.



Also, I think it works with ordered lists and unordered lists.



Many thanks!



Edit: as DanielWainfleet points out in the comments "if $x^2=4y$ then $g([x,y])={x/2}$ which has only one element. So the above can't go from ordered sets of two elements to unordered sets of two elements.



So I'd like to revise the question to the highly related case of including sets of one OR two elements (unordered sets stay at two elements).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let's write ordered sets as $[a,b,c,...]$ and ${a,b,c,...}$ for unordered sets.



Now let $f(a,b)=[a+b,a b]$. Note $f(a,b)=f(b,a).$



Consider $g([x,y])={a,b}$ where $a+b=x,a b=y$.



Mathematica's Solve function came up with $left{frac{1}{2} left(x-sqrt{x^2-4 y}right),frac{1}{2} left(sqrt{x^2-4 y}+xright)right}$ as the value of ${a,b}$ given $[x,y]$, and in my testing, it worked for everything I threw at it. (On a philosophical note it is interesting that just from the definitions provided there's no implied order for $a$ and $b$ given $[x,y]$.)



Is this a correct one-to-one correspondence from ordered sets of two elements to unordered sets of two elements in the domain of imaginary numbers? If so, does it have a name? I'd like to find out more about it.



As an aside, the one element and three element cases seem to work also. Mathematica spent a long time trying to find equations for my guess at the four element case $a+b+c+d,a b+a c+a d+b c+b d+c d,a b c+a b d+a c d+b c d,a b c d$, but eventually I aborted it. I suspect if there is a solution, it might generalize to $n$ elements.



Also, I think it works with ordered lists and unordered lists.



Many thanks!



Edit: as DanielWainfleet points out in the comments "if $x^2=4y$ then $g([x,y])={x/2}$ which has only one element. So the above can't go from ordered sets of two elements to unordered sets of two elements.



So I'd like to revise the question to the highly related case of including sets of one OR two elements (unordered sets stay at two elements).







elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jun 17 '17 at 19:12







Tyler Spaeth

















asked Jun 17 '17 at 0:06









Tyler SpaethTyler Spaeth

464




464












  • $begingroup$
    What does $g([x,y])={a,b}$ mean here? The way I would usually interpret it doesn't seem to be what you mean.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:13










  • $begingroup$
    It means that $g$ is a function from an unordered set $[x,y]$ to a set ${a,b}$. Maybe $g:[x,y]mapsto{a,b}$ is more correct. As for symmetric polynomials, they look highly related, but I'm not seeing this particular application.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Spaeth
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:54












  • $begingroup$
    (Side note: the above should read "It's supposed to mean...". I didn't mean to imply that was a reasonable way of writing that.)
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Spaeth
    Jun 17 '17 at 1:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If $x^2=4y$ then $g([x,y]) ={x/2}$ has only $1$ member.
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jun 17 '17 at 2:04


















  • $begingroup$
    What does $g([x,y])={a,b}$ mean here? The way I would usually interpret it doesn't seem to be what you mean.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:13










  • $begingroup$
    It means that $g$ is a function from an unordered set $[x,y]$ to a set ${a,b}$. Maybe $g:[x,y]mapsto{a,b}$ is more correct. As for symmetric polynomials, they look highly related, but I'm not seeing this particular application.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Spaeth
    Jun 17 '17 at 0:54












  • $begingroup$
    (Side note: the above should read "It's supposed to mean...". I didn't mean to imply that was a reasonable way of writing that.)
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Spaeth
    Jun 17 '17 at 1:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If $x^2=4y$ then $g([x,y]) ={x/2}$ has only $1$ member.
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Jun 17 '17 at 2:04
















$begingroup$
What does $g([x,y])={a,b}$ mean here? The way I would usually interpret it doesn't seem to be what you mean.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jun 17 '17 at 0:10




$begingroup$
What does $g([x,y])={a,b}$ mean here? The way I would usually interpret it doesn't seem to be what you mean.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jun 17 '17 at 0:10




1




1




$begingroup$
See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jun 17 '17 at 0:13




$begingroup$
See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jun 17 '17 at 0:13












$begingroup$
It means that $g$ is a function from an unordered set $[x,y]$ to a set ${a,b}$. Maybe $g:[x,y]mapsto{a,b}$ is more correct. As for symmetric polynomials, they look highly related, but I'm not seeing this particular application.
$endgroup$
– Tyler Spaeth
Jun 17 '17 at 0:54






$begingroup$
It means that $g$ is a function from an unordered set $[x,y]$ to a set ${a,b}$. Maybe $g:[x,y]mapsto{a,b}$ is more correct. As for symmetric polynomials, they look highly related, but I'm not seeing this particular application.
$endgroup$
– Tyler Spaeth
Jun 17 '17 at 0:54














$begingroup$
(Side note: the above should read "It's supposed to mean...". I didn't mean to imply that was a reasonable way of writing that.)
$endgroup$
– Tyler Spaeth
Jun 17 '17 at 1:04




$begingroup$
(Side note: the above should read "It's supposed to mean...". I didn't mean to imply that was a reasonable way of writing that.)
$endgroup$
– Tyler Spaeth
Jun 17 '17 at 1:04




1




1




$begingroup$
If $x^2=4y$ then $g([x,y]) ={x/2}$ has only $1$ member.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Jun 17 '17 at 2:04




$begingroup$
If $x^2=4y$ then $g([x,y]) ={x/2}$ has only $1$ member.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Jun 17 '17 at 2:04










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Does it have a name? — Yes, it's called the quadratic formula along with Vieta's formulas (often also referred to as Vieta's theorem).



That's because effectively, to find $a$ and $b$, you need to solve the equation $t^2-xt+y=0$. By Vieta's formulas, the coefficients $x$ and $y$ and the roots $a$ and $b$ of this quadratic equation are related precisely in the way you defined $x$ and $y$, i.e. $x=a+b$ and $y=ab$. And the proof of this relation is fairly simple too: the quadratic equation with the roots $a$ and $b$ and the leading coefficient $1$ has to be
$$(t-a)(t-b)=0 iff t^2-at-bt+ab=0 iff t^2-underbrace{(a+b)}_{x}t+underbrace{ab}_{y}=0.$$



What you observed with three and more numbers is the same thing extended to polynomial equations of higher degree: symmetric polynomials in the roots of a polynomial equation are the coefficients of that equation.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2325645%2fdoes-the-system-of-equations-a-b-a-b-provide-a-one-to-one-correspondence-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Does it have a name? — Yes, it's called the quadratic formula along with Vieta's formulas (often also referred to as Vieta's theorem).



    That's because effectively, to find $a$ and $b$, you need to solve the equation $t^2-xt+y=0$. By Vieta's formulas, the coefficients $x$ and $y$ and the roots $a$ and $b$ of this quadratic equation are related precisely in the way you defined $x$ and $y$, i.e. $x=a+b$ and $y=ab$. And the proof of this relation is fairly simple too: the quadratic equation with the roots $a$ and $b$ and the leading coefficient $1$ has to be
    $$(t-a)(t-b)=0 iff t^2-at-bt+ab=0 iff t^2-underbrace{(a+b)}_{x}t+underbrace{ab}_{y}=0.$$



    What you observed with three and more numbers is the same thing extended to polynomial equations of higher degree: symmetric polynomials in the roots of a polynomial equation are the coefficients of that equation.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Does it have a name? — Yes, it's called the quadratic formula along with Vieta's formulas (often also referred to as Vieta's theorem).



      That's because effectively, to find $a$ and $b$, you need to solve the equation $t^2-xt+y=0$. By Vieta's formulas, the coefficients $x$ and $y$ and the roots $a$ and $b$ of this quadratic equation are related precisely in the way you defined $x$ and $y$, i.e. $x=a+b$ and $y=ab$. And the proof of this relation is fairly simple too: the quadratic equation with the roots $a$ and $b$ and the leading coefficient $1$ has to be
      $$(t-a)(t-b)=0 iff t^2-at-bt+ab=0 iff t^2-underbrace{(a+b)}_{x}t+underbrace{ab}_{y}=0.$$



      What you observed with three and more numbers is the same thing extended to polynomial equations of higher degree: symmetric polynomials in the roots of a polynomial equation are the coefficients of that equation.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Does it have a name? — Yes, it's called the quadratic formula along with Vieta's formulas (often also referred to as Vieta's theorem).



        That's because effectively, to find $a$ and $b$, you need to solve the equation $t^2-xt+y=0$. By Vieta's formulas, the coefficients $x$ and $y$ and the roots $a$ and $b$ of this quadratic equation are related precisely in the way you defined $x$ and $y$, i.e. $x=a+b$ and $y=ab$. And the proof of this relation is fairly simple too: the quadratic equation with the roots $a$ and $b$ and the leading coefficient $1$ has to be
        $$(t-a)(t-b)=0 iff t^2-at-bt+ab=0 iff t^2-underbrace{(a+b)}_{x}t+underbrace{ab}_{y}=0.$$



        What you observed with three and more numbers is the same thing extended to polynomial equations of higher degree: symmetric polynomials in the roots of a polynomial equation are the coefficients of that equation.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Does it have a name? — Yes, it's called the quadratic formula along with Vieta's formulas (often also referred to as Vieta's theorem).



        That's because effectively, to find $a$ and $b$, you need to solve the equation $t^2-xt+y=0$. By Vieta's formulas, the coefficients $x$ and $y$ and the roots $a$ and $b$ of this quadratic equation are related precisely in the way you defined $x$ and $y$, i.e. $x=a+b$ and $y=ab$. And the proof of this relation is fairly simple too: the quadratic equation with the roots $a$ and $b$ and the leading coefficient $1$ has to be
        $$(t-a)(t-b)=0 iff t^2-at-bt+ab=0 iff t^2-underbrace{(a+b)}_{x}t+underbrace{ab}_{y}=0.$$



        What you observed with three and more numbers is the same thing extended to polynomial equations of higher degree: symmetric polynomials in the roots of a polynomial equation are the coefficients of that equation.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 24 '18 at 17:25









        zipirovichzipirovich

        11.3k11731




        11.3k11731






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2325645%2fdoes-the-system-of-equations-a-b-a-b-provide-a-one-to-one-correspondence-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix