Find all ordered pairs $(a,b)$ of positive integers for which $frac{1}{a} + frac{1}{b} = frac{3}{2018}$
$begingroup$
This question comes from the 2018 Putnam and can be found in the following link:
https://kskedlaya.org/putnam-archive/
So far, I got the following two equations using simple algebra:
(1) $2018a = b(3a - 2018)$
(2) $2018b = a(3b - 2018)$
Then, I divide (1) by $b$ and I divide (2) by $a$ to get
(3) $frac{2018a}{b} = (3a - 2018)$
(4) $frac{2018b}{a} = (3b - 2018)$
Multiplying (3) and (4) together, I get $(2018)^2 = (3a - 2018)(3b-2018)$
So $(2018mod3)$ is congruent to $(2mod3)$ and $(2mod3)^2$ is congruent to $(1 mod3)$. In the answer provided, I'm told that each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$. Do we not consider the case when both factors are congruent to $(2mod3)$ because only $2$ satisfies this requirement, and
$2$ x $2 = 4$ is definitely not equal to $2018$?
modular-arithmetic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question comes from the 2018 Putnam and can be found in the following link:
https://kskedlaya.org/putnam-archive/
So far, I got the following two equations using simple algebra:
(1) $2018a = b(3a - 2018)$
(2) $2018b = a(3b - 2018)$
Then, I divide (1) by $b$ and I divide (2) by $a$ to get
(3) $frac{2018a}{b} = (3a - 2018)$
(4) $frac{2018b}{a} = (3b - 2018)$
Multiplying (3) and (4) together, I get $(2018)^2 = (3a - 2018)(3b-2018)$
So $(2018mod3)$ is congruent to $(2mod3)$ and $(2mod3)^2$ is congruent to $(1 mod3)$. In the answer provided, I'm told that each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$. Do we not consider the case when both factors are congruent to $(2mod3)$ because only $2$ satisfies this requirement, and
$2$ x $2 = 4$ is definitely not equal to $2018$?
modular-arithmetic
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It is obvious that $(3a-2018)equiv 1 pmod 3$, for all $a$, since $2018equiv -1 pmod 3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 24 '18 at 16:59
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/3050899/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 24 '18 at 17:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question comes from the 2018 Putnam and can be found in the following link:
https://kskedlaya.org/putnam-archive/
So far, I got the following two equations using simple algebra:
(1) $2018a = b(3a - 2018)$
(2) $2018b = a(3b - 2018)$
Then, I divide (1) by $b$ and I divide (2) by $a$ to get
(3) $frac{2018a}{b} = (3a - 2018)$
(4) $frac{2018b}{a} = (3b - 2018)$
Multiplying (3) and (4) together, I get $(2018)^2 = (3a - 2018)(3b-2018)$
So $(2018mod3)$ is congruent to $(2mod3)$ and $(2mod3)^2$ is congruent to $(1 mod3)$. In the answer provided, I'm told that each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$. Do we not consider the case when both factors are congruent to $(2mod3)$ because only $2$ satisfies this requirement, and
$2$ x $2 = 4$ is definitely not equal to $2018$?
modular-arithmetic
$endgroup$
This question comes from the 2018 Putnam and can be found in the following link:
https://kskedlaya.org/putnam-archive/
So far, I got the following two equations using simple algebra:
(1) $2018a = b(3a - 2018)$
(2) $2018b = a(3b - 2018)$
Then, I divide (1) by $b$ and I divide (2) by $a$ to get
(3) $frac{2018a}{b} = (3a - 2018)$
(4) $frac{2018b}{a} = (3b - 2018)$
Multiplying (3) and (4) together, I get $(2018)^2 = (3a - 2018)(3b-2018)$
So $(2018mod3)$ is congruent to $(2mod3)$ and $(2mod3)^2$ is congruent to $(1 mod3)$. In the answer provided, I'm told that each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$. Do we not consider the case when both factors are congruent to $(2mod3)$ because only $2$ satisfies this requirement, and
$2$ x $2 = 4$ is definitely not equal to $2018$?
modular-arithmetic
modular-arithmetic
asked Dec 24 '18 at 16:47
K.MK.M
698412
698412
1
$begingroup$
It is obvious that $(3a-2018)equiv 1 pmod 3$, for all $a$, since $2018equiv -1 pmod 3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 24 '18 at 16:59
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/3050899/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 24 '18 at 17:03
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It is obvious that $(3a-2018)equiv 1 pmod 3$, for all $a$, since $2018equiv -1 pmod 3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 24 '18 at 16:59
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/3050899/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 24 '18 at 17:03
1
1
$begingroup$
It is obvious that $(3a-2018)equiv 1 pmod 3$, for all $a$, since $2018equiv -1 pmod 3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 24 '18 at 16:59
$begingroup$
It is obvious that $(3a-2018)equiv 1 pmod 3$, for all $a$, since $2018equiv -1 pmod 3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 24 '18 at 16:59
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/3050899/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 24 '18 at 17:03
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/3050899/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 24 '18 at 17:03
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You want to look at factorizations of $2018^2$ where each term $equiv -2018 equiv 1 mod 3$. Since $2018 = 2 times 1009$ with $1009$ prime, there are not too many solutions.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do we not consider the case when both factors are congruent to (2mod3) ...?
There is no such case since both factors in $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ are congruent to $1$ (mod $3$) whatever integers you take for $a$ and $b$:
$$
3n-2018=-2018=1pmod{3},quad forall nin{mathbb{Z}}.
$$
That's why the solution says so:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
you're correct, each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$ by the logic you've used above. But I'm not sure if the reasoning I used in my explanation is incorrect, perhaps inefficient?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@K.M "because only 2 satisfies this requirement" does not make sense in that $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ can never be $2$. Then why would you consider $2$ in the first place? Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "this requirement".
$endgroup$
– user587192
Dec 24 '18 at 17:59
$begingroup$
well, I meant to say that each factor respectively could be congruent to $(2 mod 3)$. Since we have that $(2 mod 3)(2mod 3)$=($2$ x $2$ $mod 3$) = $(1 mod 3)$. But it is incorrect to say that only $2 equiv 2mod 3$.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:29
$begingroup$
and yes, $(2 mod 3)$ does not equal $(1 mod 3)$. I apologize for ruining mathematics.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take $d=gcd(a,b)$, with $a=da_2$, $b=db_2$. Then $frac 1 a + frac 1 b = frac 1 {da_2} + frac 1 {db_2}$. $a_2$ and $b_2$ are by definition coprime, so $frac {b_2+a_2}{da_2b_2}$ is a fraction in simplest form that is equal to $frac 3 {2018}$. Since $da_2b_2=2018$, and $1009$ is a prime factor of $2018$, it follows that of $d$, $a_2$, and $b_2$, one of them must be $1009$, and clearly that would be $d$ (otherwise the numerator $b_2+a_2$ would contain a $1009$, which is more than $3$). It then follows that of $a_2$ and $b_2$, one of them is $2$, and then it follows that the other is $1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
More generally,
if
$dfrac1{a}+dfrac1{b}
=dfrac{u}{v}$,
then
$v(a+b)
=abu
$
or
$begin{array}\
0
&=abu^2-uv(a+b)\
&=abu^2-uv(a+b)+v^2-v^2\
&=(au-v)(bu-v)-v^2\
end{array}
$
so
$(au-v)(bu-v)=v^2
$.
In particular,
either
$augt v, bu gt v$
or
$ault v, bu lt v$.
We can assume that
$a ge b$.
If $a=b$
then
$(au-v)^2=v^2
$
so
$au-v = pm v$
so that
$a = frac{2v}{u}$
(which gives
$frac1{a}=frac{u}{2v}$)
or
$a=0$ ,
which not be.
For there to be a solution here,
we must have
$u | 2v$.
So we can assume
from now on
that $a > b$.
For each factorization
$v^2 = rs$
with $r le s$,
for a solution
we must have either
$au-v=r, bu-v = s
$,
$au-v=s, bu-v = r
$,
$au-v=-r, bu-v = -s
$,
or
$au-v=-s, bu-v = -r$.
Since
$a > b$ and $r le s$,
the first and third cases can not hold,
so either
$a = frac{v+s}{u},
b = frac{v+r}{u}
$
or
$a = frac{v-r}{u},
b = frac{v-s}{u}
$.
For these to be integers,
we must have either
$u | (v+s),
u | (v+r)$
or
$u | (v-r),
u | (v-s)$.
In either case,
we must have
$u | (s-r)$.
By looking at
$v bmod u$
we can quickly decide
which $r$ and $s$
will work.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was wondering if you could further elaborate as to why we choose to assume that $a>b$?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 25 '18 at 3:46
$begingroup$
The problem is symmetric in a and b, so any solution with a < b implies one with a > b.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
Dec 25 '18 at 5:06
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051443%2ffind-all-ordered-pairs-a-b-of-positive-integers-for-which-frac1a-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You want to look at factorizations of $2018^2$ where each term $equiv -2018 equiv 1 mod 3$. Since $2018 = 2 times 1009$ with $1009$ prime, there are not too many solutions.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You want to look at factorizations of $2018^2$ where each term $equiv -2018 equiv 1 mod 3$. Since $2018 = 2 times 1009$ with $1009$ prime, there are not too many solutions.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You want to look at factorizations of $2018^2$ where each term $equiv -2018 equiv 1 mod 3$. Since $2018 = 2 times 1009$ with $1009$ prime, there are not too many solutions.
$endgroup$
You want to look at factorizations of $2018^2$ where each term $equiv -2018 equiv 1 mod 3$. Since $2018 = 2 times 1009$ with $1009$ prime, there are not too many solutions.
answered Dec 24 '18 at 16:59
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
327k23216470
327k23216470
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do we not consider the case when both factors are congruent to (2mod3) ...?
There is no such case since both factors in $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ are congruent to $1$ (mod $3$) whatever integers you take for $a$ and $b$:
$$
3n-2018=-2018=1pmod{3},quad forall nin{mathbb{Z}}.
$$
That's why the solution says so:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
you're correct, each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$ by the logic you've used above. But I'm not sure if the reasoning I used in my explanation is incorrect, perhaps inefficient?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@K.M "because only 2 satisfies this requirement" does not make sense in that $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ can never be $2$. Then why would you consider $2$ in the first place? Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "this requirement".
$endgroup$
– user587192
Dec 24 '18 at 17:59
$begingroup$
well, I meant to say that each factor respectively could be congruent to $(2 mod 3)$. Since we have that $(2 mod 3)(2mod 3)$=($2$ x $2$ $mod 3$) = $(1 mod 3)$. But it is incorrect to say that only $2 equiv 2mod 3$.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:29
$begingroup$
and yes, $(2 mod 3)$ does not equal $(1 mod 3)$. I apologize for ruining mathematics.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do we not consider the case when both factors are congruent to (2mod3) ...?
There is no such case since both factors in $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ are congruent to $1$ (mod $3$) whatever integers you take for $a$ and $b$:
$$
3n-2018=-2018=1pmod{3},quad forall nin{mathbb{Z}}.
$$
That's why the solution says so:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
you're correct, each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$ by the logic you've used above. But I'm not sure if the reasoning I used in my explanation is incorrect, perhaps inefficient?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@K.M "because only 2 satisfies this requirement" does not make sense in that $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ can never be $2$. Then why would you consider $2$ in the first place? Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "this requirement".
$endgroup$
– user587192
Dec 24 '18 at 17:59
$begingroup$
well, I meant to say that each factor respectively could be congruent to $(2 mod 3)$. Since we have that $(2 mod 3)(2mod 3)$=($2$ x $2$ $mod 3$) = $(1 mod 3)$. But it is incorrect to say that only $2 equiv 2mod 3$.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:29
$begingroup$
and yes, $(2 mod 3)$ does not equal $(1 mod 3)$. I apologize for ruining mathematics.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do we not consider the case when both factors are congruent to (2mod3) ...?
There is no such case since both factors in $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ are congruent to $1$ (mod $3$) whatever integers you take for $a$ and $b$:
$$
3n-2018=-2018=1pmod{3},quad forall nin{mathbb{Z}}.
$$
That's why the solution says so:
$endgroup$
Do we not consider the case when both factors are congruent to (2mod3) ...?
There is no such case since both factors in $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ are congruent to $1$ (mod $3$) whatever integers you take for $a$ and $b$:
$$
3n-2018=-2018=1pmod{3},quad forall nin{mathbb{Z}}.
$$
That's why the solution says so:
edited Dec 24 '18 at 17:14
answered Dec 24 '18 at 17:08
user587192
$begingroup$
you're correct, each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$ by the logic you've used above. But I'm not sure if the reasoning I used in my explanation is incorrect, perhaps inefficient?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@K.M "because only 2 satisfies this requirement" does not make sense in that $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ can never be $2$. Then why would you consider $2$ in the first place? Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "this requirement".
$endgroup$
– user587192
Dec 24 '18 at 17:59
$begingroup$
well, I meant to say that each factor respectively could be congruent to $(2 mod 3)$. Since we have that $(2 mod 3)(2mod 3)$=($2$ x $2$ $mod 3$) = $(1 mod 3)$. But it is incorrect to say that only $2 equiv 2mod 3$.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:29
$begingroup$
and yes, $(2 mod 3)$ does not equal $(1 mod 3)$. I apologize for ruining mathematics.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
you're correct, each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$ by the logic you've used above. But I'm not sure if the reasoning I used in my explanation is incorrect, perhaps inefficient?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@K.M "because only 2 satisfies this requirement" does not make sense in that $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ can never be $2$. Then why would you consider $2$ in the first place? Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "this requirement".
$endgroup$
– user587192
Dec 24 '18 at 17:59
$begingroup$
well, I meant to say that each factor respectively could be congruent to $(2 mod 3)$. Since we have that $(2 mod 3)(2mod 3)$=($2$ x $2$ $mod 3$) = $(1 mod 3)$. But it is incorrect to say that only $2 equiv 2mod 3$.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:29
$begingroup$
and yes, $(2 mod 3)$ does not equal $(1 mod 3)$. I apologize for ruining mathematics.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:34
$begingroup$
you're correct, each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$ by the logic you've used above. But I'm not sure if the reasoning I used in my explanation is incorrect, perhaps inefficient?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 17:24
$begingroup$
you're correct, each of the factors is congruent to $(1mod3)$ by the logic you've used above. But I'm not sure if the reasoning I used in my explanation is incorrect, perhaps inefficient?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@K.M "because only 2 satisfies this requirement" does not make sense in that $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ can never be $2$. Then why would you consider $2$ in the first place? Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "this requirement".
$endgroup$
– user587192
Dec 24 '18 at 17:59
$begingroup$
@K.M "because only 2 satisfies this requirement" does not make sense in that $(3a-2018)(3b-2018)$ can never be $2$. Then why would you consider $2$ in the first place? Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "this requirement".
$endgroup$
– user587192
Dec 24 '18 at 17:59
$begingroup$
well, I meant to say that each factor respectively could be congruent to $(2 mod 3)$. Since we have that $(2 mod 3)(2mod 3)$=($2$ x $2$ $mod 3$) = $(1 mod 3)$. But it is incorrect to say that only $2 equiv 2mod 3$.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:29
$begingroup$
well, I meant to say that each factor respectively could be congruent to $(2 mod 3)$. Since we have that $(2 mod 3)(2mod 3)$=($2$ x $2$ $mod 3$) = $(1 mod 3)$. But it is incorrect to say that only $2 equiv 2mod 3$.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:29
$begingroup$
and yes, $(2 mod 3)$ does not equal $(1 mod 3)$. I apologize for ruining mathematics.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:34
$begingroup$
and yes, $(2 mod 3)$ does not equal $(1 mod 3)$. I apologize for ruining mathematics.
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 24 '18 at 18:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take $d=gcd(a,b)$, with $a=da_2$, $b=db_2$. Then $frac 1 a + frac 1 b = frac 1 {da_2} + frac 1 {db_2}$. $a_2$ and $b_2$ are by definition coprime, so $frac {b_2+a_2}{da_2b_2}$ is a fraction in simplest form that is equal to $frac 3 {2018}$. Since $da_2b_2=2018$, and $1009$ is a prime factor of $2018$, it follows that of $d$, $a_2$, and $b_2$, one of them must be $1009$, and clearly that would be $d$ (otherwise the numerator $b_2+a_2$ would contain a $1009$, which is more than $3$). It then follows that of $a_2$ and $b_2$, one of them is $2$, and then it follows that the other is $1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take $d=gcd(a,b)$, with $a=da_2$, $b=db_2$. Then $frac 1 a + frac 1 b = frac 1 {da_2} + frac 1 {db_2}$. $a_2$ and $b_2$ are by definition coprime, so $frac {b_2+a_2}{da_2b_2}$ is a fraction in simplest form that is equal to $frac 3 {2018}$. Since $da_2b_2=2018$, and $1009$ is a prime factor of $2018$, it follows that of $d$, $a_2$, and $b_2$, one of them must be $1009$, and clearly that would be $d$ (otherwise the numerator $b_2+a_2$ would contain a $1009$, which is more than $3$). It then follows that of $a_2$ and $b_2$, one of them is $2$, and then it follows that the other is $1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take $d=gcd(a,b)$, with $a=da_2$, $b=db_2$. Then $frac 1 a + frac 1 b = frac 1 {da_2} + frac 1 {db_2}$. $a_2$ and $b_2$ are by definition coprime, so $frac {b_2+a_2}{da_2b_2}$ is a fraction in simplest form that is equal to $frac 3 {2018}$. Since $da_2b_2=2018$, and $1009$ is a prime factor of $2018$, it follows that of $d$, $a_2$, and $b_2$, one of them must be $1009$, and clearly that would be $d$ (otherwise the numerator $b_2+a_2$ would contain a $1009$, which is more than $3$). It then follows that of $a_2$ and $b_2$, one of them is $2$, and then it follows that the other is $1$.
$endgroup$
Take $d=gcd(a,b)$, with $a=da_2$, $b=db_2$. Then $frac 1 a + frac 1 b = frac 1 {da_2} + frac 1 {db_2}$. $a_2$ and $b_2$ are by definition coprime, so $frac {b_2+a_2}{da_2b_2}$ is a fraction in simplest form that is equal to $frac 3 {2018}$. Since $da_2b_2=2018$, and $1009$ is a prime factor of $2018$, it follows that of $d$, $a_2$, and $b_2$, one of them must be $1009$, and clearly that would be $d$ (otherwise the numerator $b_2+a_2$ would contain a $1009$, which is more than $3$). It then follows that of $a_2$ and $b_2$, one of them is $2$, and then it follows that the other is $1$.
answered Dec 24 '18 at 17:24
AcccumulationAcccumulation
7,1252619
7,1252619
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
More generally,
if
$dfrac1{a}+dfrac1{b}
=dfrac{u}{v}$,
then
$v(a+b)
=abu
$
or
$begin{array}\
0
&=abu^2-uv(a+b)\
&=abu^2-uv(a+b)+v^2-v^2\
&=(au-v)(bu-v)-v^2\
end{array}
$
so
$(au-v)(bu-v)=v^2
$.
In particular,
either
$augt v, bu gt v$
or
$ault v, bu lt v$.
We can assume that
$a ge b$.
If $a=b$
then
$(au-v)^2=v^2
$
so
$au-v = pm v$
so that
$a = frac{2v}{u}$
(which gives
$frac1{a}=frac{u}{2v}$)
or
$a=0$ ,
which not be.
For there to be a solution here,
we must have
$u | 2v$.
So we can assume
from now on
that $a > b$.
For each factorization
$v^2 = rs$
with $r le s$,
for a solution
we must have either
$au-v=r, bu-v = s
$,
$au-v=s, bu-v = r
$,
$au-v=-r, bu-v = -s
$,
or
$au-v=-s, bu-v = -r$.
Since
$a > b$ and $r le s$,
the first and third cases can not hold,
so either
$a = frac{v+s}{u},
b = frac{v+r}{u}
$
or
$a = frac{v-r}{u},
b = frac{v-s}{u}
$.
For these to be integers,
we must have either
$u | (v+s),
u | (v+r)$
or
$u | (v-r),
u | (v-s)$.
In either case,
we must have
$u | (s-r)$.
By looking at
$v bmod u$
we can quickly decide
which $r$ and $s$
will work.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was wondering if you could further elaborate as to why we choose to assume that $a>b$?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 25 '18 at 3:46
$begingroup$
The problem is symmetric in a and b, so any solution with a < b implies one with a > b.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
Dec 25 '18 at 5:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
More generally,
if
$dfrac1{a}+dfrac1{b}
=dfrac{u}{v}$,
then
$v(a+b)
=abu
$
or
$begin{array}\
0
&=abu^2-uv(a+b)\
&=abu^2-uv(a+b)+v^2-v^2\
&=(au-v)(bu-v)-v^2\
end{array}
$
so
$(au-v)(bu-v)=v^2
$.
In particular,
either
$augt v, bu gt v$
or
$ault v, bu lt v$.
We can assume that
$a ge b$.
If $a=b$
then
$(au-v)^2=v^2
$
so
$au-v = pm v$
so that
$a = frac{2v}{u}$
(which gives
$frac1{a}=frac{u}{2v}$)
or
$a=0$ ,
which not be.
For there to be a solution here,
we must have
$u | 2v$.
So we can assume
from now on
that $a > b$.
For each factorization
$v^2 = rs$
with $r le s$,
for a solution
we must have either
$au-v=r, bu-v = s
$,
$au-v=s, bu-v = r
$,
$au-v=-r, bu-v = -s
$,
or
$au-v=-s, bu-v = -r$.
Since
$a > b$ and $r le s$,
the first and third cases can not hold,
so either
$a = frac{v+s}{u},
b = frac{v+r}{u}
$
or
$a = frac{v-r}{u},
b = frac{v-s}{u}
$.
For these to be integers,
we must have either
$u | (v+s),
u | (v+r)$
or
$u | (v-r),
u | (v-s)$.
In either case,
we must have
$u | (s-r)$.
By looking at
$v bmod u$
we can quickly decide
which $r$ and $s$
will work.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was wondering if you could further elaborate as to why we choose to assume that $a>b$?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 25 '18 at 3:46
$begingroup$
The problem is symmetric in a and b, so any solution with a < b implies one with a > b.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
Dec 25 '18 at 5:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
More generally,
if
$dfrac1{a}+dfrac1{b}
=dfrac{u}{v}$,
then
$v(a+b)
=abu
$
or
$begin{array}\
0
&=abu^2-uv(a+b)\
&=abu^2-uv(a+b)+v^2-v^2\
&=(au-v)(bu-v)-v^2\
end{array}
$
so
$(au-v)(bu-v)=v^2
$.
In particular,
either
$augt v, bu gt v$
or
$ault v, bu lt v$.
We can assume that
$a ge b$.
If $a=b$
then
$(au-v)^2=v^2
$
so
$au-v = pm v$
so that
$a = frac{2v}{u}$
(which gives
$frac1{a}=frac{u}{2v}$)
or
$a=0$ ,
which not be.
For there to be a solution here,
we must have
$u | 2v$.
So we can assume
from now on
that $a > b$.
For each factorization
$v^2 = rs$
with $r le s$,
for a solution
we must have either
$au-v=r, bu-v = s
$,
$au-v=s, bu-v = r
$,
$au-v=-r, bu-v = -s
$,
or
$au-v=-s, bu-v = -r$.
Since
$a > b$ and $r le s$,
the first and third cases can not hold,
so either
$a = frac{v+s}{u},
b = frac{v+r}{u}
$
or
$a = frac{v-r}{u},
b = frac{v-s}{u}
$.
For these to be integers,
we must have either
$u | (v+s),
u | (v+r)$
or
$u | (v-r),
u | (v-s)$.
In either case,
we must have
$u | (s-r)$.
By looking at
$v bmod u$
we can quickly decide
which $r$ and $s$
will work.
$endgroup$
More generally,
if
$dfrac1{a}+dfrac1{b}
=dfrac{u}{v}$,
then
$v(a+b)
=abu
$
or
$begin{array}\
0
&=abu^2-uv(a+b)\
&=abu^2-uv(a+b)+v^2-v^2\
&=(au-v)(bu-v)-v^2\
end{array}
$
so
$(au-v)(bu-v)=v^2
$.
In particular,
either
$augt v, bu gt v$
or
$ault v, bu lt v$.
We can assume that
$a ge b$.
If $a=b$
then
$(au-v)^2=v^2
$
so
$au-v = pm v$
so that
$a = frac{2v}{u}$
(which gives
$frac1{a}=frac{u}{2v}$)
or
$a=0$ ,
which not be.
For there to be a solution here,
we must have
$u | 2v$.
So we can assume
from now on
that $a > b$.
For each factorization
$v^2 = rs$
with $r le s$,
for a solution
we must have either
$au-v=r, bu-v = s
$,
$au-v=s, bu-v = r
$,
$au-v=-r, bu-v = -s
$,
or
$au-v=-s, bu-v = -r$.
Since
$a > b$ and $r le s$,
the first and third cases can not hold,
so either
$a = frac{v+s}{u},
b = frac{v+r}{u}
$
or
$a = frac{v-r}{u},
b = frac{v-s}{u}
$.
For these to be integers,
we must have either
$u | (v+s),
u | (v+r)$
or
$u | (v-r),
u | (v-s)$.
In either case,
we must have
$u | (s-r)$.
By looking at
$v bmod u$
we can quickly decide
which $r$ and $s$
will work.
answered Dec 24 '18 at 21:00
marty cohenmarty cohen
74.3k549128
74.3k549128
$begingroup$
I was wondering if you could further elaborate as to why we choose to assume that $a>b$?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 25 '18 at 3:46
$begingroup$
The problem is symmetric in a and b, so any solution with a < b implies one with a > b.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
Dec 25 '18 at 5:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was wondering if you could further elaborate as to why we choose to assume that $a>b$?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 25 '18 at 3:46
$begingroup$
The problem is symmetric in a and b, so any solution with a < b implies one with a > b.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
Dec 25 '18 at 5:06
$begingroup$
I was wondering if you could further elaborate as to why we choose to assume that $a>b$?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 25 '18 at 3:46
$begingroup$
I was wondering if you could further elaborate as to why we choose to assume that $a>b$?
$endgroup$
– K.M
Dec 25 '18 at 3:46
$begingroup$
The problem is symmetric in a and b, so any solution with a < b implies one with a > b.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
Dec 25 '18 at 5:06
$begingroup$
The problem is symmetric in a and b, so any solution with a < b implies one with a > b.
$endgroup$
– marty cohen
Dec 25 '18 at 5:06
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051443%2ffind-all-ordered-pairs-a-b-of-positive-integers-for-which-frac1a-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
It is obvious that $(3a-2018)equiv 1 pmod 3$, for all $a$, since $2018equiv -1 pmod 3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 24 '18 at 16:59
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/3050899/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 24 '18 at 17:03