Infinite tetration, convergence radius
$begingroup$
I got this problem from my teacher as a optional challenge. I am open about this being a given problem, however it is not homework.
The problem is stated as follows. Assume we have an infinite tetration as follows
$$x^{x^{x^{.^{.^.}}}} , = , a$$
With a given $a$ find $x$. The next part of the problem was to discuss the convergence radius of a. If a is too big or too small the tetration does not converge.
Below is my humble stab at the problem.
My friend said you would have to treat the tetration as a infinnite serie, and therefore coul not perform algebraic manipulations on it before it is know wheter it converges or diverges.
However my attempt is to first do some algebraic steps, then discuss the convergence radius.
I) Initial discussion
At the start it is obvious that the tetration converges when $a=1$ (just set $x=1$)
Now after some computer hardwork it seems that the tetration fails to converge when a is roughly larger than 3.
II) Algebraic manipulation
$$ x^{x^{x^{.^{.^.}}}} , = , a$$
This is the same as
$$ x^a , = , a$$
$$ log_a(x^a) , = , log_a(a)$$
$$ log_a(x) , = , frac{1}{a}$$
$$ x , = , a^{frac{1}{a}}$$
Now, if we let $a=2$ then $x = sqrt{2}$. After some more computational work, this seems to be correct. Which makes me belive this fomula is correct.
III) Discsussion about convergence
By looking at the derivative of $ displaystyle large a^{frac{1}{a}} $ we see that the maxima occurs when $a=e$. Which also seems to correspond with the inital computational work.
Now I think, that the minima of $displaystyle large a^{1/a}$ is zero, by looking at its graph. And study its derivative and endpoints.
So that my "guess" or work shows that a converges when
$$ a in [0 , , , 1/e] $$
VI) My questions
Can my algebraic manipulations be justified? They seem rather sketchy
taking the a`th logarithm and so on . (Although they seem to "magicaly"
give out the right answer)
By looking at wikipedia it seems that the tetration converge when
$$ a in left[ 1/e , , , e right] $$
This is almost what I have, why is my lower bound worng? How can I find the correct lower bound?
real-analysis convergence exponentiation tetration
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I got this problem from my teacher as a optional challenge. I am open about this being a given problem, however it is not homework.
The problem is stated as follows. Assume we have an infinite tetration as follows
$$x^{x^{x^{.^{.^.}}}} , = , a$$
With a given $a$ find $x$. The next part of the problem was to discuss the convergence radius of a. If a is too big or too small the tetration does not converge.
Below is my humble stab at the problem.
My friend said you would have to treat the tetration as a infinnite serie, and therefore coul not perform algebraic manipulations on it before it is know wheter it converges or diverges.
However my attempt is to first do some algebraic steps, then discuss the convergence radius.
I) Initial discussion
At the start it is obvious that the tetration converges when $a=1$ (just set $x=1$)
Now after some computer hardwork it seems that the tetration fails to converge when a is roughly larger than 3.
II) Algebraic manipulation
$$ x^{x^{x^{.^{.^.}}}} , = , a$$
This is the same as
$$ x^a , = , a$$
$$ log_a(x^a) , = , log_a(a)$$
$$ log_a(x) , = , frac{1}{a}$$
$$ x , = , a^{frac{1}{a}}$$
Now, if we let $a=2$ then $x = sqrt{2}$. After some more computational work, this seems to be correct. Which makes me belive this fomula is correct.
III) Discsussion about convergence
By looking at the derivative of $ displaystyle large a^{frac{1}{a}} $ we see that the maxima occurs when $a=e$. Which also seems to correspond with the inital computational work.
Now I think, that the minima of $displaystyle large a^{1/a}$ is zero, by looking at its graph. And study its derivative and endpoints.
So that my "guess" or work shows that a converges when
$$ a in [0 , , , 1/e] $$
VI) My questions
Can my algebraic manipulations be justified? They seem rather sketchy
taking the a`th logarithm and so on . (Although they seem to "magicaly"
give out the right answer)
By looking at wikipedia it seems that the tetration converge when
$$ a in left[ 1/e , , , e right] $$
This is almost what I have, why is my lower bound worng? How can I find the correct lower bound?
real-analysis convergence exponentiation tetration
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Perhaps you want to take a look at this question : I must say though it is not a duplicate question, but the question you ask is related. (This link is dealing with $a=2$ and maybe other users will think of some other linked questions) math.stackexchange.com/questions/87870/…
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
I am confident that there is probably an answer to this question already written out on this website.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
Yes, I actually searched before asking I could not find anything dealing with the generall case. Nor anything dealing with how to find the lower bound. Also this is not a straight duplicate, as I ask if my method is correct. =)
$endgroup$
– N3buchadnezzar
Feb 11 '12 at 23:06
$begingroup$
Recall that the logarithm function is a multi-valued function in the complex numbers... "taking the log" might be nasty, as detailed in the link I've added, we had issues with that. Maybe there's a link in my linked question you could take a look at.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Look at $x, x^x, x^{x^x}, ldots$. In other words, starting with $a_0 = x$ and then $a_{n+1}=x^{a_n}$, you would want $lim_{n to infty} a_n = a$. This does not converge if $x lt e^{-e}$.
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 11 '12 at 23:34
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I got this problem from my teacher as a optional challenge. I am open about this being a given problem, however it is not homework.
The problem is stated as follows. Assume we have an infinite tetration as follows
$$x^{x^{x^{.^{.^.}}}} , = , a$$
With a given $a$ find $x$. The next part of the problem was to discuss the convergence radius of a. If a is too big or too small the tetration does not converge.
Below is my humble stab at the problem.
My friend said you would have to treat the tetration as a infinnite serie, and therefore coul not perform algebraic manipulations on it before it is know wheter it converges or diverges.
However my attempt is to first do some algebraic steps, then discuss the convergence radius.
I) Initial discussion
At the start it is obvious that the tetration converges when $a=1$ (just set $x=1$)
Now after some computer hardwork it seems that the tetration fails to converge when a is roughly larger than 3.
II) Algebraic manipulation
$$ x^{x^{x^{.^{.^.}}}} , = , a$$
This is the same as
$$ x^a , = , a$$
$$ log_a(x^a) , = , log_a(a)$$
$$ log_a(x) , = , frac{1}{a}$$
$$ x , = , a^{frac{1}{a}}$$
Now, if we let $a=2$ then $x = sqrt{2}$. After some more computational work, this seems to be correct. Which makes me belive this fomula is correct.
III) Discsussion about convergence
By looking at the derivative of $ displaystyle large a^{frac{1}{a}} $ we see that the maxima occurs when $a=e$. Which also seems to correspond with the inital computational work.
Now I think, that the minima of $displaystyle large a^{1/a}$ is zero, by looking at its graph. And study its derivative and endpoints.
So that my "guess" or work shows that a converges when
$$ a in [0 , , , 1/e] $$
VI) My questions
Can my algebraic manipulations be justified? They seem rather sketchy
taking the a`th logarithm and so on . (Although they seem to "magicaly"
give out the right answer)
By looking at wikipedia it seems that the tetration converge when
$$ a in left[ 1/e , , , e right] $$
This is almost what I have, why is my lower bound worng? How can I find the correct lower bound?
real-analysis convergence exponentiation tetration
$endgroup$
I got this problem from my teacher as a optional challenge. I am open about this being a given problem, however it is not homework.
The problem is stated as follows. Assume we have an infinite tetration as follows
$$x^{x^{x^{.^{.^.}}}} , = , a$$
With a given $a$ find $x$. The next part of the problem was to discuss the convergence radius of a. If a is too big or too small the tetration does not converge.
Below is my humble stab at the problem.
My friend said you would have to treat the tetration as a infinnite serie, and therefore coul not perform algebraic manipulations on it before it is know wheter it converges or diverges.
However my attempt is to first do some algebraic steps, then discuss the convergence radius.
I) Initial discussion
At the start it is obvious that the tetration converges when $a=1$ (just set $x=1$)
Now after some computer hardwork it seems that the tetration fails to converge when a is roughly larger than 3.
II) Algebraic manipulation
$$ x^{x^{x^{.^{.^.}}}} , = , a$$
This is the same as
$$ x^a , = , a$$
$$ log_a(x^a) , = , log_a(a)$$
$$ log_a(x) , = , frac{1}{a}$$
$$ x , = , a^{frac{1}{a}}$$
Now, if we let $a=2$ then $x = sqrt{2}$. After some more computational work, this seems to be correct. Which makes me belive this fomula is correct.
III) Discsussion about convergence
By looking at the derivative of $ displaystyle large a^{frac{1}{a}} $ we see that the maxima occurs when $a=e$. Which also seems to correspond with the inital computational work.
Now I think, that the minima of $displaystyle large a^{1/a}$ is zero, by looking at its graph. And study its derivative and endpoints.
So that my "guess" or work shows that a converges when
$$ a in [0 , , , 1/e] $$
VI) My questions
Can my algebraic manipulations be justified? They seem rather sketchy
taking the a`th logarithm and so on . (Although they seem to "magicaly"
give out the right answer)
By looking at wikipedia it seems that the tetration converge when
$$ a in left[ 1/e , , , e right] $$
This is almost what I have, why is my lower bound worng? How can I find the correct lower bound?
real-analysis convergence exponentiation tetration
real-analysis convergence exponentiation tetration
edited Sep 24 '17 at 14:09
Did
246k23221456
246k23221456
asked Feb 11 '12 at 22:16
N3buchadnezzarN3buchadnezzar
5,86333271
5,86333271
$begingroup$
Perhaps you want to take a look at this question : I must say though it is not a duplicate question, but the question you ask is related. (This link is dealing with $a=2$ and maybe other users will think of some other linked questions) math.stackexchange.com/questions/87870/…
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
I am confident that there is probably an answer to this question already written out on this website.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
Yes, I actually searched before asking I could not find anything dealing with the generall case. Nor anything dealing with how to find the lower bound. Also this is not a straight duplicate, as I ask if my method is correct. =)
$endgroup$
– N3buchadnezzar
Feb 11 '12 at 23:06
$begingroup$
Recall that the logarithm function is a multi-valued function in the complex numbers... "taking the log" might be nasty, as detailed in the link I've added, we had issues with that. Maybe there's a link in my linked question you could take a look at.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Look at $x, x^x, x^{x^x}, ldots$. In other words, starting with $a_0 = x$ and then $a_{n+1}=x^{a_n}$, you would want $lim_{n to infty} a_n = a$. This does not converge if $x lt e^{-e}$.
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 11 '12 at 23:34
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Perhaps you want to take a look at this question : I must say though it is not a duplicate question, but the question you ask is related. (This link is dealing with $a=2$ and maybe other users will think of some other linked questions) math.stackexchange.com/questions/87870/…
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
I am confident that there is probably an answer to this question already written out on this website.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
Yes, I actually searched before asking I could not find anything dealing with the generall case. Nor anything dealing with how to find the lower bound. Also this is not a straight duplicate, as I ask if my method is correct. =)
$endgroup$
– N3buchadnezzar
Feb 11 '12 at 23:06
$begingroup$
Recall that the logarithm function is a multi-valued function in the complex numbers... "taking the log" might be nasty, as detailed in the link I've added, we had issues with that. Maybe there's a link in my linked question you could take a look at.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Look at $x, x^x, x^{x^x}, ldots$. In other words, starting with $a_0 = x$ and then $a_{n+1}=x^{a_n}$, you would want $lim_{n to infty} a_n = a$. This does not converge if $x lt e^{-e}$.
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 11 '12 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Perhaps you want to take a look at this question : I must say though it is not a duplicate question, but the question you ask is related. (This link is dealing with $a=2$ and maybe other users will think of some other linked questions) math.stackexchange.com/questions/87870/…
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
Perhaps you want to take a look at this question : I must say though it is not a duplicate question, but the question you ask is related. (This link is dealing with $a=2$ and maybe other users will think of some other linked questions) math.stackexchange.com/questions/87870/…
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
I am confident that there is probably an answer to this question already written out on this website.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
I am confident that there is probably an answer to this question already written out on this website.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
Yes, I actually searched before asking I could not find anything dealing with the generall case. Nor anything dealing with how to find the lower bound. Also this is not a straight duplicate, as I ask if my method is correct. =)
$endgroup$
– N3buchadnezzar
Feb 11 '12 at 23:06
$begingroup$
Yes, I actually searched before asking I could not find anything dealing with the generall case. Nor anything dealing with how to find the lower bound. Also this is not a straight duplicate, as I ask if my method is correct. =)
$endgroup$
– N3buchadnezzar
Feb 11 '12 at 23:06
$begingroup$
Recall that the logarithm function is a multi-valued function in the complex numbers... "taking the log" might be nasty, as detailed in the link I've added, we had issues with that. Maybe there's a link in my linked question you could take a look at.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Recall that the logarithm function is a multi-valued function in the complex numbers... "taking the log" might be nasty, as detailed in the link I've added, we had issues with that. Maybe there's a link in my linked question you could take a look at.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Look at $x, x^x, x^{x^x}, ldots$. In other words, starting with $a_0 = x$ and then $a_{n+1}=x^{a_n}$, you would want $lim_{n to infty} a_n = a$. This does not converge if $x lt e^{-e}$.
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 11 '12 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Look at $x, x^x, x^{x^x}, ldots$. In other words, starting with $a_0 = x$ and then $a_{n+1}=x^{a_n}$, you would want $lim_{n to infty} a_n = a$. This does not converge if $x lt e^{-e}$.
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 11 '12 at 23:34
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, I would recommend reading "Exponentials Reiterated" by R.A.Knoebel, http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/22/?pa=content&sa=viewDocument&nodeId=3087&pf=1. It is by far the most comprehensive resource on infinite tetration. Second, your question might have been answered sooner if you had posted on the Tetration Forum, http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/index.php. Lastly, I think it is very encouraging to see others interested in this subject, since I've been interested in it for quite a long time now.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Funny, I linked to that in this answer... whose corresponding questions was what Pat was pointing to in the comments.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Feb 15 '12 at 17:03
3
$begingroup$
Hi, welcome Andy at MSE! Good to hear of you after a long time...
$endgroup$
– Gottfried Helms
Feb 15 '12 at 17:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Define
$$f(t)=x^t$$
In order to have this converge, we want
$$|f(t)-a|<|t-a|$$
where $a=f(a)$ and $t$ is sufficiently close to $a$. If there are multiple solutions, then $a=min{t=f(t)}$. Dividing both sides by $|t-a|$ and rewriting, we see we need to have
$$left|frac{f(t)-f(a)}{t-a}right|<1$$
By the mean value theorem, we need
$$|f'(xi)|<1$$
for some $xi$ between $t$ and $a$. Since $f'$ is continuous, this means we must have
$$|f'(a)|le1$$
We proceed to find that
$$f'(a)=x^aln(x)=aln(x)=ln(x^a)=ln(a)$$
and thus, we want
$$|ln(a)|le1$$
leading to $ain[1/e,e]$. Since $a=x^a$, we have $x=a^{1/a}$, and hence $xin[1/e^e,e^{1/e}]$.
Convergence on the boundaries is not guaranteed. For $x=1/e^e$ and $a=1/e$, note that $f(f(t))$ is increasing and bounded above by $a$ for $t<a$, and decreasing and bounded below by $a$ for $t>a$. For $x=e^{1/e}$ and $a=e$, note that $f(t)$ is increasing and bounded above by $a$ for $t<a$. Hence it will converge on the boundaries.
Likewise note that it cannot converge outside of this range unless the initial value is equal to $a$, with $x=-a$, for example.
And so we have
$$xin[1/e^e,e^{1/e}]$$
as was claimed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I would really like to know how this work, why do the fixed points of $fleft( tright) =x^{t}$ only converge if $left| f'left( aright) right| =1$? And how do you show convergence at the $e^{-e}$ boundary?
$endgroup$
– JimSi
Jul 24 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
@JimSi updated.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 25 '18 at 12:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
[note: As mentioned in comments, this is actually infinite exponentiation, not infinite tetration.]
I've played around with this. For $e^{-frac{1}{e}} le x le e^{frac{1}{e}}$ it converges as you insert extra terms at the bottom of the tower, and for $x=e^{-frac{1}{e}} $ it looks as though it does but I've not proved it.
Call $T_n$ the value of the $n$th tower (eg $T_3 = x^{x^x}$)
For $1<xle e^frac{1}{e}$ the convergence happens because for each $n$, $T_n <T_{n+1}<e$ so you've got an increasing sequence bounded above by $e$. (An incressing sequence which is bounded above is guaranteed to converge.)
For $x<1$ things are trickier because you get an alternating sequence and have to prove that it converges to one value rather than odd terms converging to one value and even ones to another.
We can also prove that if all terms of an infinite tower are in the range $[1,e^frac{1}{e}]$ it will converge: it's not even necessary for the sequence of terms (as opposed to the sequence of towers) to converge as long as no more than finitely many are outside that range.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108288%2finfinite-tetration-convergence-radius%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, I would recommend reading "Exponentials Reiterated" by R.A.Knoebel, http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/22/?pa=content&sa=viewDocument&nodeId=3087&pf=1. It is by far the most comprehensive resource on infinite tetration. Second, your question might have been answered sooner if you had posted on the Tetration Forum, http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/index.php. Lastly, I think it is very encouraging to see others interested in this subject, since I've been interested in it for quite a long time now.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Funny, I linked to that in this answer... whose corresponding questions was what Pat was pointing to in the comments.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Feb 15 '12 at 17:03
3
$begingroup$
Hi, welcome Andy at MSE! Good to hear of you after a long time...
$endgroup$
– Gottfried Helms
Feb 15 '12 at 17:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, I would recommend reading "Exponentials Reiterated" by R.A.Knoebel, http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/22/?pa=content&sa=viewDocument&nodeId=3087&pf=1. It is by far the most comprehensive resource on infinite tetration. Second, your question might have been answered sooner if you had posted on the Tetration Forum, http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/index.php. Lastly, I think it is very encouraging to see others interested in this subject, since I've been interested in it for quite a long time now.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Funny, I linked to that in this answer... whose corresponding questions was what Pat was pointing to in the comments.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Feb 15 '12 at 17:03
3
$begingroup$
Hi, welcome Andy at MSE! Good to hear of you after a long time...
$endgroup$
– Gottfried Helms
Feb 15 '12 at 17:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, I would recommend reading "Exponentials Reiterated" by R.A.Knoebel, http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/22/?pa=content&sa=viewDocument&nodeId=3087&pf=1. It is by far the most comprehensive resource on infinite tetration. Second, your question might have been answered sooner if you had posted on the Tetration Forum, http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/index.php. Lastly, I think it is very encouraging to see others interested in this subject, since I've been interested in it for quite a long time now.
$endgroup$
First, I would recommend reading "Exponentials Reiterated" by R.A.Knoebel, http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/22/?pa=content&sa=viewDocument&nodeId=3087&pf=1. It is by far the most comprehensive resource on infinite tetration. Second, your question might have been answered sooner if you had posted on the Tetration Forum, http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/index.php. Lastly, I think it is very encouraging to see others interested in this subject, since I've been interested in it for quite a long time now.
answered Feb 15 '12 at 16:47
Andrew RobbinsAndrew Robbins
17113
17113
$begingroup$
Funny, I linked to that in this answer... whose corresponding questions was what Pat was pointing to in the comments.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Feb 15 '12 at 17:03
3
$begingroup$
Hi, welcome Andy at MSE! Good to hear of you after a long time...
$endgroup$
– Gottfried Helms
Feb 15 '12 at 17:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Funny, I linked to that in this answer... whose corresponding questions was what Pat was pointing to in the comments.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Feb 15 '12 at 17:03
3
$begingroup$
Hi, welcome Andy at MSE! Good to hear of you after a long time...
$endgroup$
– Gottfried Helms
Feb 15 '12 at 17:17
$begingroup$
Funny, I linked to that in this answer... whose corresponding questions was what Pat was pointing to in the comments.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Feb 15 '12 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Funny, I linked to that in this answer... whose corresponding questions was what Pat was pointing to in the comments.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Feb 15 '12 at 17:03
3
3
$begingroup$
Hi, welcome Andy at MSE! Good to hear of you after a long time...
$endgroup$
– Gottfried Helms
Feb 15 '12 at 17:17
$begingroup$
Hi, welcome Andy at MSE! Good to hear of you after a long time...
$endgroup$
– Gottfried Helms
Feb 15 '12 at 17:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Define
$$f(t)=x^t$$
In order to have this converge, we want
$$|f(t)-a|<|t-a|$$
where $a=f(a)$ and $t$ is sufficiently close to $a$. If there are multiple solutions, then $a=min{t=f(t)}$. Dividing both sides by $|t-a|$ and rewriting, we see we need to have
$$left|frac{f(t)-f(a)}{t-a}right|<1$$
By the mean value theorem, we need
$$|f'(xi)|<1$$
for some $xi$ between $t$ and $a$. Since $f'$ is continuous, this means we must have
$$|f'(a)|le1$$
We proceed to find that
$$f'(a)=x^aln(x)=aln(x)=ln(x^a)=ln(a)$$
and thus, we want
$$|ln(a)|le1$$
leading to $ain[1/e,e]$. Since $a=x^a$, we have $x=a^{1/a}$, and hence $xin[1/e^e,e^{1/e}]$.
Convergence on the boundaries is not guaranteed. For $x=1/e^e$ and $a=1/e$, note that $f(f(t))$ is increasing and bounded above by $a$ for $t<a$, and decreasing and bounded below by $a$ for $t>a$. For $x=e^{1/e}$ and $a=e$, note that $f(t)$ is increasing and bounded above by $a$ for $t<a$. Hence it will converge on the boundaries.
Likewise note that it cannot converge outside of this range unless the initial value is equal to $a$, with $x=-a$, for example.
And so we have
$$xin[1/e^e,e^{1/e}]$$
as was claimed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I would really like to know how this work, why do the fixed points of $fleft( tright) =x^{t}$ only converge if $left| f'left( aright) right| =1$? And how do you show convergence at the $e^{-e}$ boundary?
$endgroup$
– JimSi
Jul 24 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
@JimSi updated.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 25 '18 at 12:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Define
$$f(t)=x^t$$
In order to have this converge, we want
$$|f(t)-a|<|t-a|$$
where $a=f(a)$ and $t$ is sufficiently close to $a$. If there are multiple solutions, then $a=min{t=f(t)}$. Dividing both sides by $|t-a|$ and rewriting, we see we need to have
$$left|frac{f(t)-f(a)}{t-a}right|<1$$
By the mean value theorem, we need
$$|f'(xi)|<1$$
for some $xi$ between $t$ and $a$. Since $f'$ is continuous, this means we must have
$$|f'(a)|le1$$
We proceed to find that
$$f'(a)=x^aln(x)=aln(x)=ln(x^a)=ln(a)$$
and thus, we want
$$|ln(a)|le1$$
leading to $ain[1/e,e]$. Since $a=x^a$, we have $x=a^{1/a}$, and hence $xin[1/e^e,e^{1/e}]$.
Convergence on the boundaries is not guaranteed. For $x=1/e^e$ and $a=1/e$, note that $f(f(t))$ is increasing and bounded above by $a$ for $t<a$, and decreasing and bounded below by $a$ for $t>a$. For $x=e^{1/e}$ and $a=e$, note that $f(t)$ is increasing and bounded above by $a$ for $t<a$. Hence it will converge on the boundaries.
Likewise note that it cannot converge outside of this range unless the initial value is equal to $a$, with $x=-a$, for example.
And so we have
$$xin[1/e^e,e^{1/e}]$$
as was claimed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I would really like to know how this work, why do the fixed points of $fleft( tright) =x^{t}$ only converge if $left| f'left( aright) right| =1$? And how do you show convergence at the $e^{-e}$ boundary?
$endgroup$
– JimSi
Jul 24 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
@JimSi updated.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 25 '18 at 12:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Define
$$f(t)=x^t$$
In order to have this converge, we want
$$|f(t)-a|<|t-a|$$
where $a=f(a)$ and $t$ is sufficiently close to $a$. If there are multiple solutions, then $a=min{t=f(t)}$. Dividing both sides by $|t-a|$ and rewriting, we see we need to have
$$left|frac{f(t)-f(a)}{t-a}right|<1$$
By the mean value theorem, we need
$$|f'(xi)|<1$$
for some $xi$ between $t$ and $a$. Since $f'$ is continuous, this means we must have
$$|f'(a)|le1$$
We proceed to find that
$$f'(a)=x^aln(x)=aln(x)=ln(x^a)=ln(a)$$
and thus, we want
$$|ln(a)|le1$$
leading to $ain[1/e,e]$. Since $a=x^a$, we have $x=a^{1/a}$, and hence $xin[1/e^e,e^{1/e}]$.
Convergence on the boundaries is not guaranteed. For $x=1/e^e$ and $a=1/e$, note that $f(f(t))$ is increasing and bounded above by $a$ for $t<a$, and decreasing and bounded below by $a$ for $t>a$. For $x=e^{1/e}$ and $a=e$, note that $f(t)$ is increasing and bounded above by $a$ for $t<a$. Hence it will converge on the boundaries.
Likewise note that it cannot converge outside of this range unless the initial value is equal to $a$, with $x=-a$, for example.
And so we have
$$xin[1/e^e,e^{1/e}]$$
as was claimed.
$endgroup$
Define
$$f(t)=x^t$$
In order to have this converge, we want
$$|f(t)-a|<|t-a|$$
where $a=f(a)$ and $t$ is sufficiently close to $a$. If there are multiple solutions, then $a=min{t=f(t)}$. Dividing both sides by $|t-a|$ and rewriting, we see we need to have
$$left|frac{f(t)-f(a)}{t-a}right|<1$$
By the mean value theorem, we need
$$|f'(xi)|<1$$
for some $xi$ between $t$ and $a$. Since $f'$ is continuous, this means we must have
$$|f'(a)|le1$$
We proceed to find that
$$f'(a)=x^aln(x)=aln(x)=ln(x^a)=ln(a)$$
and thus, we want
$$|ln(a)|le1$$
leading to $ain[1/e,e]$. Since $a=x^a$, we have $x=a^{1/a}$, and hence $xin[1/e^e,e^{1/e}]$.
Convergence on the boundaries is not guaranteed. For $x=1/e^e$ and $a=1/e$, note that $f(f(t))$ is increasing and bounded above by $a$ for $t<a$, and decreasing and bounded below by $a$ for $t>a$. For $x=e^{1/e}$ and $a=e$, note that $f(t)$ is increasing and bounded above by $a$ for $t<a$. Hence it will converge on the boundaries.
Likewise note that it cannot converge outside of this range unless the initial value is equal to $a$, with $x=-a$, for example.
And so we have
$$xin[1/e^e,e^{1/e}]$$
as was claimed.
edited Jul 25 '18 at 12:50
answered Sep 24 '17 at 13:15
Simply Beautiful ArtSimply Beautiful Art
50.4k578181
50.4k578181
$begingroup$
I would really like to know how this work, why do the fixed points of $fleft( tright) =x^{t}$ only converge if $left| f'left( aright) right| =1$? And how do you show convergence at the $e^{-e}$ boundary?
$endgroup$
– JimSi
Jul 24 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
@JimSi updated.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 25 '18 at 12:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would really like to know how this work, why do the fixed points of $fleft( tright) =x^{t}$ only converge if $left| f'left( aright) right| =1$? And how do you show convergence at the $e^{-e}$ boundary?
$endgroup$
– JimSi
Jul 24 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
@JimSi updated.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 25 '18 at 12:50
$begingroup$
I would really like to know how this work, why do the fixed points of $fleft( tright) =x^{t}$ only converge if $left| f'left( aright) right| =1$? And how do you show convergence at the $e^{-e}$ boundary?
$endgroup$
– JimSi
Jul 24 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
I would really like to know how this work, why do the fixed points of $fleft( tright) =x^{t}$ only converge if $left| f'left( aright) right| =1$? And how do you show convergence at the $e^{-e}$ boundary?
$endgroup$
– JimSi
Jul 24 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
@JimSi updated.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 25 '18 at 12:50
$begingroup$
@JimSi updated.
$endgroup$
– Simply Beautiful Art
Jul 25 '18 at 12:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
[note: As mentioned in comments, this is actually infinite exponentiation, not infinite tetration.]
I've played around with this. For $e^{-frac{1}{e}} le x le e^{frac{1}{e}}$ it converges as you insert extra terms at the bottom of the tower, and for $x=e^{-frac{1}{e}} $ it looks as though it does but I've not proved it.
Call $T_n$ the value of the $n$th tower (eg $T_3 = x^{x^x}$)
For $1<xle e^frac{1}{e}$ the convergence happens because for each $n$, $T_n <T_{n+1}<e$ so you've got an increasing sequence bounded above by $e$. (An incressing sequence which is bounded above is guaranteed to converge.)
For $x<1$ things are trickier because you get an alternating sequence and have to prove that it converges to one value rather than odd terms converging to one value and even ones to another.
We can also prove that if all terms of an infinite tower are in the range $[1,e^frac{1}{e}]$ it will converge: it's not even necessary for the sequence of terms (as opposed to the sequence of towers) to converge as long as no more than finitely many are outside that range.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
[note: As mentioned in comments, this is actually infinite exponentiation, not infinite tetration.]
I've played around with this. For $e^{-frac{1}{e}} le x le e^{frac{1}{e}}$ it converges as you insert extra terms at the bottom of the tower, and for $x=e^{-frac{1}{e}} $ it looks as though it does but I've not proved it.
Call $T_n$ the value of the $n$th tower (eg $T_3 = x^{x^x}$)
For $1<xle e^frac{1}{e}$ the convergence happens because for each $n$, $T_n <T_{n+1}<e$ so you've got an increasing sequence bounded above by $e$. (An incressing sequence which is bounded above is guaranteed to converge.)
For $x<1$ things are trickier because you get an alternating sequence and have to prove that it converges to one value rather than odd terms converging to one value and even ones to another.
We can also prove that if all terms of an infinite tower are in the range $[1,e^frac{1}{e}]$ it will converge: it's not even necessary for the sequence of terms (as opposed to the sequence of towers) to converge as long as no more than finitely many are outside that range.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
[note: As mentioned in comments, this is actually infinite exponentiation, not infinite tetration.]
I've played around with this. For $e^{-frac{1}{e}} le x le e^{frac{1}{e}}$ it converges as you insert extra terms at the bottom of the tower, and for $x=e^{-frac{1}{e}} $ it looks as though it does but I've not proved it.
Call $T_n$ the value of the $n$th tower (eg $T_3 = x^{x^x}$)
For $1<xle e^frac{1}{e}$ the convergence happens because for each $n$, $T_n <T_{n+1}<e$ so you've got an increasing sequence bounded above by $e$. (An incressing sequence which is bounded above is guaranteed to converge.)
For $x<1$ things are trickier because you get an alternating sequence and have to prove that it converges to one value rather than odd terms converging to one value and even ones to another.
We can also prove that if all terms of an infinite tower are in the range $[1,e^frac{1}{e}]$ it will converge: it's not even necessary for the sequence of terms (as opposed to the sequence of towers) to converge as long as no more than finitely many are outside that range.
$endgroup$
[note: As mentioned in comments, this is actually infinite exponentiation, not infinite tetration.]
I've played around with this. For $e^{-frac{1}{e}} le x le e^{frac{1}{e}}$ it converges as you insert extra terms at the bottom of the tower, and for $x=e^{-frac{1}{e}} $ it looks as though it does but I've not proved it.
Call $T_n$ the value of the $n$th tower (eg $T_3 = x^{x^x}$)
For $1<xle e^frac{1}{e}$ the convergence happens because for each $n$, $T_n <T_{n+1}<e$ so you've got an increasing sequence bounded above by $e$. (An incressing sequence which is bounded above is guaranteed to converge.)
For $x<1$ things are trickier because you get an alternating sequence and have to prove that it converges to one value rather than odd terms converging to one value and even ones to another.
We can also prove that if all terms of an infinite tower are in the range $[1,e^frac{1}{e}]$ it will converge: it's not even necessary for the sequence of terms (as opposed to the sequence of towers) to converge as long as no more than finitely many are outside that range.
edited Dec 1 '18 at 16:47
answered Dec 1 '18 at 16:02
timtfjtimtfj
1,163318
1,163318
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108288%2finfinite-tetration-convergence-radius%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Perhaps you want to take a look at this question : I must say though it is not a duplicate question, but the question you ask is related. (This link is dealing with $a=2$ and maybe other users will think of some other linked questions) math.stackexchange.com/questions/87870/…
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
I am confident that there is probably an answer to this question already written out on this website.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 22:50
$begingroup$
Yes, I actually searched before asking I could not find anything dealing with the generall case. Nor anything dealing with how to find the lower bound. Also this is not a straight duplicate, as I ask if my method is correct. =)
$endgroup$
– N3buchadnezzar
Feb 11 '12 at 23:06
$begingroup$
Recall that the logarithm function is a multi-valued function in the complex numbers... "taking the log" might be nasty, as detailed in the link I've added, we had issues with that. Maybe there's a link in my linked question you could take a look at.
$endgroup$
– Patrick Da Silva
Feb 11 '12 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Look at $x, x^x, x^{x^x}, ldots$. In other words, starting with $a_0 = x$ and then $a_{n+1}=x^{a_n}$, you would want $lim_{n to infty} a_n = a$. This does not converge if $x lt e^{-e}$.
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 11 '12 at 23:34