Is the condition sufficient?












12












$begingroup$


I am stuck on the following problem:



Let $f:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ be continuous and $2pi$-periodic and $n$ be a positive integer. If for any integer $p in [0,n-1]$,
$$int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) cos(pt),mathrm{d}t=int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) sin(pt),mathrm{d}t=0,$$

then is it true that $f$ has at least $2n$ roots on $[0,2pi]$?



I tried to prove the problem using induction. $p=0$ is easy , but $p=1$ is giving me a hard time.



Edit: After the comment of Dear Dunham , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero , in other to work , in that case we have the form :
$$ int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) e^{ipt} mathrm{d}t=0$$ ,
Now it looks like the trigonometric version of Prove that $f$ has $m+1$ zeros if $int_{a}^{b} x^nf(x)dx=0$ for all $nle m$



Edit: I made some progress with the new version of the question in the case $f$ is not identicaly $0$ , and proved $M geq n$ , where $M$ is the number of zeros of $f$ as follow :

Let $(T_{n})$ the sequence of Tchebychev polynomial , $cos(nt)=T_{n}(cos(t))$ and $deg(T_{n})=n$ . hence $(T_{0},...,T_{n-1})$ is a basis of $R_{n-1}[X]$ ,$0leq a_{1}<a_{2}<... <a_{m}leq pi leq a_{m+1}<..<a_{p}$ the zeros of $f$ and suppose that $pleq n-1$ .

For $i in [1,m-1]$ such that $a_{i}<x<a_{i+1}$ since cosinus is decreasing in $[0,pi[$ then $b_{i+1}=cos(a_{i+1}) < cos(x) < b_{i}=cos(a_{i})$ ,

on the other hand, for $j in [m ,p-1]$ we have $c_{j}=cos(a_{j}) < cos(x) < c_{j+1}=cos(a_{j+1})$ since here cosine is increasing in $[pi ,2 pi]$.
We have then $(d_{n})$ constructed from $(b_{n})$ and $(c_{n})$ such that : $forall x in [0,2pi]-J : f(x) Pi_{i=1}^{p} (cos(x)-d_{i}) > 0$ where
$J={a_{1},a_{2},....,a_{p}, d_{1},...,d_{p}}$ , the polynomial $P(x)=Pi_{i=1}^{p}(x-d_{i})$ is of degree at most $n-1$ , hence we have $(t_{i})$ such that: $P(cos(t))=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} t_{i}T_{i}(cos(t))$ by linearity of the integral, we conclude that : $int_{0}^{2pi} f(t)P(t)=0$ hence $f(x)=0$ For any $x in [0,2pi]-J$ , hence by continuity $f=0$ every where, contradiction .



I feel that I can improve this solution , by a better choice of the sequence of polynomial , one that also include the orthoganility with the familly $sin(pt)$ $p in [[0,n-1]]$ this information is critical to improve the bound , any help ? thank you a lot .










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I probably do not understand your statement correctly. Your induction should go on $n$, right? For $n=1$ (then you only have $p=0$) you should, according to the statement have at least $2$ zeros. But the only thing you get from the condition is $int_0^{2pi}f(t),dt=0$ which enforces only one zero. What do I miss?
    $endgroup$
    – mickep
    Feb 14 '18 at 19:34










  • $begingroup$
    @mickep , thank your interest , here is the details of my argument for $n=1$ , because $f$ is $2pi$ periodic and continuous $f$ must vanish at least $2$ times ; suppose that there is only one $u in [0, 2pi[$ such that $f(u)=0$ , then $f$ have different signe in $[0,u[$ and $[u,2pi]$ by continuity ; then Wlog $f(0)> 0$ and $f(2pi) < 0$ but this a contradiction with the fact that $f(0)=f(2pi)$
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 15 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Did not think about the periodicity. You should probably add that $f$ is continuous, though.
    $endgroup$
    – mickep
    Feb 15 '18 at 5:30










  • $begingroup$
    oh yes i am sorry , didn't notice that I missed it . I edited thank you
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 15 '18 at 5:43










  • $begingroup$
    Similar one math.stackexchange.com/questions/2650153/…
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Feb 17 '18 at 17:42
















12












$begingroup$


I am stuck on the following problem:



Let $f:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ be continuous and $2pi$-periodic and $n$ be a positive integer. If for any integer $p in [0,n-1]$,
$$int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) cos(pt),mathrm{d}t=int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) sin(pt),mathrm{d}t=0,$$

then is it true that $f$ has at least $2n$ roots on $[0,2pi]$?



I tried to prove the problem using induction. $p=0$ is easy , but $p=1$ is giving me a hard time.



Edit: After the comment of Dear Dunham , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero , in other to work , in that case we have the form :
$$ int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) e^{ipt} mathrm{d}t=0$$ ,
Now it looks like the trigonometric version of Prove that $f$ has $m+1$ zeros if $int_{a}^{b} x^nf(x)dx=0$ for all $nle m$



Edit: I made some progress with the new version of the question in the case $f$ is not identicaly $0$ , and proved $M geq n$ , where $M$ is the number of zeros of $f$ as follow :

Let $(T_{n})$ the sequence of Tchebychev polynomial , $cos(nt)=T_{n}(cos(t))$ and $deg(T_{n})=n$ . hence $(T_{0},...,T_{n-1})$ is a basis of $R_{n-1}[X]$ ,$0leq a_{1}<a_{2}<... <a_{m}leq pi leq a_{m+1}<..<a_{p}$ the zeros of $f$ and suppose that $pleq n-1$ .

For $i in [1,m-1]$ such that $a_{i}<x<a_{i+1}$ since cosinus is decreasing in $[0,pi[$ then $b_{i+1}=cos(a_{i+1}) < cos(x) < b_{i}=cos(a_{i})$ ,

on the other hand, for $j in [m ,p-1]$ we have $c_{j}=cos(a_{j}) < cos(x) < c_{j+1}=cos(a_{j+1})$ since here cosine is increasing in $[pi ,2 pi]$.
We have then $(d_{n})$ constructed from $(b_{n})$ and $(c_{n})$ such that : $forall x in [0,2pi]-J : f(x) Pi_{i=1}^{p} (cos(x)-d_{i}) > 0$ where
$J={a_{1},a_{2},....,a_{p}, d_{1},...,d_{p}}$ , the polynomial $P(x)=Pi_{i=1}^{p}(x-d_{i})$ is of degree at most $n-1$ , hence we have $(t_{i})$ such that: $P(cos(t))=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} t_{i}T_{i}(cos(t))$ by linearity of the integral, we conclude that : $int_{0}^{2pi} f(t)P(t)=0$ hence $f(x)=0$ For any $x in [0,2pi]-J$ , hence by continuity $f=0$ every where, contradiction .



I feel that I can improve this solution , by a better choice of the sequence of polynomial , one that also include the orthoganility with the familly $sin(pt)$ $p in [[0,n-1]]$ this information is critical to improve the bound , any help ? thank you a lot .










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I probably do not understand your statement correctly. Your induction should go on $n$, right? For $n=1$ (then you only have $p=0$) you should, according to the statement have at least $2$ zeros. But the only thing you get from the condition is $int_0^{2pi}f(t),dt=0$ which enforces only one zero. What do I miss?
    $endgroup$
    – mickep
    Feb 14 '18 at 19:34










  • $begingroup$
    @mickep , thank your interest , here is the details of my argument for $n=1$ , because $f$ is $2pi$ periodic and continuous $f$ must vanish at least $2$ times ; suppose that there is only one $u in [0, 2pi[$ such that $f(u)=0$ , then $f$ have different signe in $[0,u[$ and $[u,2pi]$ by continuity ; then Wlog $f(0)> 0$ and $f(2pi) < 0$ but this a contradiction with the fact that $f(0)=f(2pi)$
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 15 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Did not think about the periodicity. You should probably add that $f$ is continuous, though.
    $endgroup$
    – mickep
    Feb 15 '18 at 5:30










  • $begingroup$
    oh yes i am sorry , didn't notice that I missed it . I edited thank you
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 15 '18 at 5:43










  • $begingroup$
    Similar one math.stackexchange.com/questions/2650153/…
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Feb 17 '18 at 17:42














12












12








12


5



$begingroup$


I am stuck on the following problem:



Let $f:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ be continuous and $2pi$-periodic and $n$ be a positive integer. If for any integer $p in [0,n-1]$,
$$int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) cos(pt),mathrm{d}t=int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) sin(pt),mathrm{d}t=0,$$

then is it true that $f$ has at least $2n$ roots on $[0,2pi]$?



I tried to prove the problem using induction. $p=0$ is easy , but $p=1$ is giving me a hard time.



Edit: After the comment of Dear Dunham , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero , in other to work , in that case we have the form :
$$ int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) e^{ipt} mathrm{d}t=0$$ ,
Now it looks like the trigonometric version of Prove that $f$ has $m+1$ zeros if $int_{a}^{b} x^nf(x)dx=0$ for all $nle m$



Edit: I made some progress with the new version of the question in the case $f$ is not identicaly $0$ , and proved $M geq n$ , where $M$ is the number of zeros of $f$ as follow :

Let $(T_{n})$ the sequence of Tchebychev polynomial , $cos(nt)=T_{n}(cos(t))$ and $deg(T_{n})=n$ . hence $(T_{0},...,T_{n-1})$ is a basis of $R_{n-1}[X]$ ,$0leq a_{1}<a_{2}<... <a_{m}leq pi leq a_{m+1}<..<a_{p}$ the zeros of $f$ and suppose that $pleq n-1$ .

For $i in [1,m-1]$ such that $a_{i}<x<a_{i+1}$ since cosinus is decreasing in $[0,pi[$ then $b_{i+1}=cos(a_{i+1}) < cos(x) < b_{i}=cos(a_{i})$ ,

on the other hand, for $j in [m ,p-1]$ we have $c_{j}=cos(a_{j}) < cos(x) < c_{j+1}=cos(a_{j+1})$ since here cosine is increasing in $[pi ,2 pi]$.
We have then $(d_{n})$ constructed from $(b_{n})$ and $(c_{n})$ such that : $forall x in [0,2pi]-J : f(x) Pi_{i=1}^{p} (cos(x)-d_{i}) > 0$ where
$J={a_{1},a_{2},....,a_{p}, d_{1},...,d_{p}}$ , the polynomial $P(x)=Pi_{i=1}^{p}(x-d_{i})$ is of degree at most $n-1$ , hence we have $(t_{i})$ such that: $P(cos(t))=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} t_{i}T_{i}(cos(t))$ by linearity of the integral, we conclude that : $int_{0}^{2pi} f(t)P(t)=0$ hence $f(x)=0$ For any $x in [0,2pi]-J$ , hence by continuity $f=0$ every where, contradiction .



I feel that I can improve this solution , by a better choice of the sequence of polynomial , one that also include the orthoganility with the familly $sin(pt)$ $p in [[0,n-1]]$ this information is critical to improve the bound , any help ? thank you a lot .










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am stuck on the following problem:



Let $f:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ be continuous and $2pi$-periodic and $n$ be a positive integer. If for any integer $p in [0,n-1]$,
$$int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) cos(pt),mathrm{d}t=int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) sin(pt),mathrm{d}t=0,$$

then is it true that $f$ has at least $2n$ roots on $[0,2pi]$?



I tried to prove the problem using induction. $p=0$ is easy , but $p=1$ is giving me a hard time.



Edit: After the comment of Dear Dunham , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero , in other to work , in that case we have the form :
$$ int_{0}^{2pi} f(t) e^{ipt} mathrm{d}t=0$$ ,
Now it looks like the trigonometric version of Prove that $f$ has $m+1$ zeros if $int_{a}^{b} x^nf(x)dx=0$ for all $nle m$



Edit: I made some progress with the new version of the question in the case $f$ is not identicaly $0$ , and proved $M geq n$ , where $M$ is the number of zeros of $f$ as follow :

Let $(T_{n})$ the sequence of Tchebychev polynomial , $cos(nt)=T_{n}(cos(t))$ and $deg(T_{n})=n$ . hence $(T_{0},...,T_{n-1})$ is a basis of $R_{n-1}[X]$ ,$0leq a_{1}<a_{2}<... <a_{m}leq pi leq a_{m+1}<..<a_{p}$ the zeros of $f$ and suppose that $pleq n-1$ .

For $i in [1,m-1]$ such that $a_{i}<x<a_{i+1}$ since cosinus is decreasing in $[0,pi[$ then $b_{i+1}=cos(a_{i+1}) < cos(x) < b_{i}=cos(a_{i})$ ,

on the other hand, for $j in [m ,p-1]$ we have $c_{j}=cos(a_{j}) < cos(x) < c_{j+1}=cos(a_{j+1})$ since here cosine is increasing in $[pi ,2 pi]$.
We have then $(d_{n})$ constructed from $(b_{n})$ and $(c_{n})$ such that : $forall x in [0,2pi]-J : f(x) Pi_{i=1}^{p} (cos(x)-d_{i}) > 0$ where
$J={a_{1},a_{2},....,a_{p}, d_{1},...,d_{p}}$ , the polynomial $P(x)=Pi_{i=1}^{p}(x-d_{i})$ is of degree at most $n-1$ , hence we have $(t_{i})$ such that: $P(cos(t))=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} t_{i}T_{i}(cos(t))$ by linearity of the integral, we conclude that : $int_{0}^{2pi} f(t)P(t)=0$ hence $f(x)=0$ For any $x in [0,2pi]-J$ , hence by continuity $f=0$ every where, contradiction .



I feel that I can improve this solution , by a better choice of the sequence of polynomial , one that also include the orthoganility with the familly $sin(pt)$ $p in [[0,n-1]]$ this information is critical to improve the bound , any help ? thank you a lot .







real-analysis integration periodic-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 24 '18 at 20:50









Hans

4,98021032




4,98021032










asked Feb 14 '18 at 19:00









otyoty

13511




13511












  • $begingroup$
    I probably do not understand your statement correctly. Your induction should go on $n$, right? For $n=1$ (then you only have $p=0$) you should, according to the statement have at least $2$ zeros. But the only thing you get from the condition is $int_0^{2pi}f(t),dt=0$ which enforces only one zero. What do I miss?
    $endgroup$
    – mickep
    Feb 14 '18 at 19:34










  • $begingroup$
    @mickep , thank your interest , here is the details of my argument for $n=1$ , because $f$ is $2pi$ periodic and continuous $f$ must vanish at least $2$ times ; suppose that there is only one $u in [0, 2pi[$ such that $f(u)=0$ , then $f$ have different signe in $[0,u[$ and $[u,2pi]$ by continuity ; then Wlog $f(0)> 0$ and $f(2pi) < 0$ but this a contradiction with the fact that $f(0)=f(2pi)$
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 15 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Did not think about the periodicity. You should probably add that $f$ is continuous, though.
    $endgroup$
    – mickep
    Feb 15 '18 at 5:30










  • $begingroup$
    oh yes i am sorry , didn't notice that I missed it . I edited thank you
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 15 '18 at 5:43










  • $begingroup$
    Similar one math.stackexchange.com/questions/2650153/…
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Feb 17 '18 at 17:42


















  • $begingroup$
    I probably do not understand your statement correctly. Your induction should go on $n$, right? For $n=1$ (then you only have $p=0$) you should, according to the statement have at least $2$ zeros. But the only thing you get from the condition is $int_0^{2pi}f(t),dt=0$ which enforces only one zero. What do I miss?
    $endgroup$
    – mickep
    Feb 14 '18 at 19:34










  • $begingroup$
    @mickep , thank your interest , here is the details of my argument for $n=1$ , because $f$ is $2pi$ periodic and continuous $f$ must vanish at least $2$ times ; suppose that there is only one $u in [0, 2pi[$ such that $f(u)=0$ , then $f$ have different signe in $[0,u[$ and $[u,2pi]$ by continuity ; then Wlog $f(0)> 0$ and $f(2pi) < 0$ but this a contradiction with the fact that $f(0)=f(2pi)$
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 15 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Did not think about the periodicity. You should probably add that $f$ is continuous, though.
    $endgroup$
    – mickep
    Feb 15 '18 at 5:30










  • $begingroup$
    oh yes i am sorry , didn't notice that I missed it . I edited thank you
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 15 '18 at 5:43










  • $begingroup$
    Similar one math.stackexchange.com/questions/2650153/…
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Feb 17 '18 at 17:42
















$begingroup$
I probably do not understand your statement correctly. Your induction should go on $n$, right? For $n=1$ (then you only have $p=0$) you should, according to the statement have at least $2$ zeros. But the only thing you get from the condition is $int_0^{2pi}f(t),dt=0$ which enforces only one zero. What do I miss?
$endgroup$
– mickep
Feb 14 '18 at 19:34




$begingroup$
I probably do not understand your statement correctly. Your induction should go on $n$, right? For $n=1$ (then you only have $p=0$) you should, according to the statement have at least $2$ zeros. But the only thing you get from the condition is $int_0^{2pi}f(t),dt=0$ which enforces only one zero. What do I miss?
$endgroup$
– mickep
Feb 14 '18 at 19:34












$begingroup$
@mickep , thank your interest , here is the details of my argument for $n=1$ , because $f$ is $2pi$ periodic and continuous $f$ must vanish at least $2$ times ; suppose that there is only one $u in [0, 2pi[$ such that $f(u)=0$ , then $f$ have different signe in $[0,u[$ and $[u,2pi]$ by continuity ; then Wlog $f(0)> 0$ and $f(2pi) < 0$ but this a contradiction with the fact that $f(0)=f(2pi)$
$endgroup$
– oty
Feb 15 '18 at 3:50




$begingroup$
@mickep , thank your interest , here is the details of my argument for $n=1$ , because $f$ is $2pi$ periodic and continuous $f$ must vanish at least $2$ times ; suppose that there is only one $u in [0, 2pi[$ such that $f(u)=0$ , then $f$ have different signe in $[0,u[$ and $[u,2pi]$ by continuity ; then Wlog $f(0)> 0$ and $f(2pi) < 0$ but this a contradiction with the fact that $f(0)=f(2pi)$
$endgroup$
– oty
Feb 15 '18 at 3:50












$begingroup$
I see. Did not think about the periodicity. You should probably add that $f$ is continuous, though.
$endgroup$
– mickep
Feb 15 '18 at 5:30




$begingroup$
I see. Did not think about the periodicity. You should probably add that $f$ is continuous, though.
$endgroup$
– mickep
Feb 15 '18 at 5:30












$begingroup$
oh yes i am sorry , didn't notice that I missed it . I edited thank you
$endgroup$
– oty
Feb 15 '18 at 5:43




$begingroup$
oh yes i am sorry , didn't notice that I missed it . I edited thank you
$endgroup$
– oty
Feb 15 '18 at 5:43












$begingroup$
Similar one math.stackexchange.com/questions/2650153/…
$endgroup$
– rtybase
Feb 17 '18 at 17:42




$begingroup$
Similar one math.stackexchange.com/questions/2650153/…
$endgroup$
– rtybase
Feb 17 '18 at 17:42










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6





+50







$begingroup$

original problem



If $f(t)=cos(t)+sin(t)$ then there are only 2 zeros, yet the conditions are true for any value of $n$.



Revised problem: proof sketch



Let $f:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be continuous and $2pi$ periodic with $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Also, suppose $int f(t)e^{ipt}dt=0$ for $|p|<n$.



Define $f_k$ to be the $k$th zero mean antiderivative of $f$.



Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros. Similarly, $f_k$ has at most $M$ zeros for all $k$.



Now, $f_1$ has a convergent Fourier series
begin{equation}
f_1(t) = sum_{ellgeq n} a_ell cos(ell t) +b_ell sin(ell t)
end{equation}



Then $f_{4L+1}$ has Fourier series
begin{equation}
f_{4L+1}(t) = sum_{ellgeq n}
frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
+frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)
end{equation}



For $L$ sufficiently large, all terms except the first
begin{equation}
frac{a_n}{n^{4L}} cos(n t)
+frac{b_n}{n^{4L}} sin(n t)
end{equation}
are negligible. This first term has $2n$ zeros, so $f_{4L+1}$ has at least $2n$ zeros. Thus $Mgeq 2n$.



Definition:



Given a continuous $2pi$-periodic function $g:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with mean 0, we can find an antiderivative
begin{equation*}
widetilde G(x) = int_0^x g(t)dt.
end{equation*}
Then the mean zero antiderivative of $g$ is
begin{equation*}
G(x) = widetilde G(x) - int_0^{2pi} widetilde{G}(t)dt.
end{equation*}
By the $k$th mean zero antiderivative, we mean $f_1$ is the mean zero antiderivative of $f$, $f_2$ is the mean zero antiderivative of $f_1$, and so on.



Proposition:
In the series,
begin{equation}
f_{4L+1}(t) = sum_{ellgeq n}
frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
+frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)
end{equation}
for sufficiently large $L$, all terms except the first are neglibible.



Proof:
WLOG assume $a_n$ or $b_n$ is nonzero. Note that
begin{equation}
a_n cos(n t)
+b_n sin(n t)
end{equation}
has $2n$ zeros and $2n$ extrema. The absolute value of the extrema is $sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}$. Therefore, we shall make $L$ large enough so that the sum of the other terms is at most $frac{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}{2n^{4L}}$. We have $|a_{ell}|le frac1{sqrt{2pi}}int_0^{2pi}|cos(ell x)f(x)|dxle frac1{sqrt{2pi}}int_0^{2pi}|f(x)|dx$ and the same bound for $|b_{ell}|$, $forallell$. The terms are bounded as follows
begin{align*}
left|sum_{ellgeq n+1}
frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
+frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)right|
&leq
2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
sum_{ellgeq n+1}
frac{1}{ell^{4L}} \
&leq
2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
+
left(
frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
+
sum_{ellgeq n+2}
frac{1}{ell^{4L}}
right)\
&leq
2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
left(
frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
+
int_{n+1}^{infty}
x^{-4L}
right)\
&=
2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
left(
frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
+
frac{1}{(4L-1)(n+1)^{4L-1}}
right)\
&leq
4max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L-1}}
end{align*}
Now, we just have to show that
begin{equation*}
4max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L-1}}
leq
frac{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}{2n^{4L}}
end{equation*}
or equivalently
begin{equation*}
frac{8nmax_{ell>n }
{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}}
{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}
leq
left(
frac{n+1}{n}
right)^{4L-1}
end{equation*}
The left-hand side is constant, while the right-hand side diverges to $infty$ as $Lrightarrow infty$. Hence the result is true for some $L$.



Proposition:
Suppose $f$ has $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Then
$f_k$ cannot have more zeros than $f$ for all $k$.



Proof:
Consider $f_1$ as a differentiable function on the circle $mathbb{T}$. The derivative of $f_1$ is $f$, which has $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Since $f$ is continuous, the derivative of $f_1$ is defined everywhere, so the only critical values of $f_1$ are the zeros of $f$. Let $t_0$ and $t_1$ be any two consecutive zeros of $f$. Then $f_1$ is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing on $[t_0,t_1]$. Hence $f_1$ has at most one zero on this interval. There are $M$ pairs of consecutive zeros of $f$. Hence $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros. A similar argument applies to $f_2$ and so on.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    you are right thank you a lot , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero .
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 17 '18 at 20:40










  • $begingroup$
    Dear @Dunham , do you mean by the k-th zero mean antiderivative , $f_{k+1}(x)=int_{0}^{x} f_{k}(x) dx$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 22 '18 at 5:43










  • $begingroup$
    @ oty I added a comment to clarify
    $endgroup$
    – Dunham
    Feb 22 '18 at 17:15










  • $begingroup$
    "Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros." This is false. $f_1$ has at most $M+1$ zeros. So it does not follow that $Mge 2n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hans
    Feb 24 '18 at 2:02










  • $begingroup$
    @hans can you provide a counterexample?
    $endgroup$
    – Dunham
    Feb 24 '18 at 2:21



















0












$begingroup$

I provide a new solution here for someone who is interested.



WLOG, assume $f(-pi)=f(pi)neq 0$(if not, just find a $x_0$ s.t. $f(x_0)neq 0$ and do the transform $g(x)=f(x-pi+x_0$).



Since $f(x)$ is continuous and periodic, there are only even points to change the sign of $f(x)$. Let these points to be
$$
x_1<x_2<cdots<x_{2k}.
$$

Then construct a function
$$
g(x)=left(sin frac{x-x_1}{2}right)cdotleft(sin frac{x-x_2}{2}right)cdotsleft(sin frac{x-x_{2k}}{2}right).
$$

Then we get
begin{equation}
int_{-pi}^pi f(x)g(x)mathrm{d} x>0. tag{1}label{1}
end{equation}

It can be rewritten as
begin{align}g(x)= &left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_1}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_1}{2}right)cdot left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_2}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_2}{2}right)\
&cdots left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_{2k}}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_{2k}}{2}right)\
=&f_1(cos x)sin x+f_2(cos x)tag{2}label{2}
end{align}

where $f_1$ and $f_2$ are polynomials and $text{deg}f_1=k-1, text{deg}f_2=k$. These two terms can be written as
begin{equation}
f_1(cos x)sin x = a_k sin kx + a_{k-1}sin (k-1)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0tag{3}label{3}
end{equation}

begin{equation}
f_2(cos x) = b_k cos kx + b_{k-1}cos (k-1)x+cdots+b_1cos x + b_0.tag{4}label{4}
end{equation}

You can prove it by induction(see the notation below). If degree $kleq n$, we get
$$
int_{-pi}^pi f(x)g(x)mathrm{d}x=0
$$

by using the condition of the problem.
It controdicts to the equation eqref{1}. Hence $kgeq n+1$ and the number of roots of $f(x)$ in $[-pi,pi]$ is at least $2n+2$.





Notation: Assume for any $k<n$, we have
begin{equation}
f_1(cos x)sin x = a_k sin kx + a_{k-1}sin (k-1)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0
end{equation}

begin{equation}
f_2(cos x) = b_k cos kx + b_{k-1}cos (k-1)x+cdots+b_1cos x + b_0
end{equation}

for all $ f_1, f_2in mathbb{R}_k[x]$.
Then for all $ g_1, g_2inmathbb{R}_{n}[x]$ , you can extract a $cos x$ and write them as
$$
g_1(cos x)sin x = cos x(a_{n-1} sin (n-1)x + a_{n-2}sin (n-2)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0)
$$

$$
g_2(cos x) = cos x(a_{n-1} cos (n-1)x + a_{n-2}cos (n-2)x+cdots+a_1cos x + a_0).
$$

Then use the formula
$$
cosalphasinbeta=frac{1}{2}left[sin(beta+alpha)+sin(beta-alpha)right]
$$

and
$$
cosalphacosbeta=frac{1}{2}left[cos(beta+alpha)+cos(beta-alpha)right].
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2650748%2fis-the-condition-sufficient%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6





    +50







    $begingroup$

    original problem



    If $f(t)=cos(t)+sin(t)$ then there are only 2 zeros, yet the conditions are true for any value of $n$.



    Revised problem: proof sketch



    Let $f:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be continuous and $2pi$ periodic with $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Also, suppose $int f(t)e^{ipt}dt=0$ for $|p|<n$.



    Define $f_k$ to be the $k$th zero mean antiderivative of $f$.



    Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros. Similarly, $f_k$ has at most $M$ zeros for all $k$.



    Now, $f_1$ has a convergent Fourier series
    begin{equation}
    f_1(t) = sum_{ellgeq n} a_ell cos(ell t) +b_ell sin(ell t)
    end{equation}



    Then $f_{4L+1}$ has Fourier series
    begin{equation}
    f_{4L+1}(t) = sum_{ellgeq n}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)
    end{equation}



    For $L$ sufficiently large, all terms except the first
    begin{equation}
    frac{a_n}{n^{4L}} cos(n t)
    +frac{b_n}{n^{4L}} sin(n t)
    end{equation}
    are negligible. This first term has $2n$ zeros, so $f_{4L+1}$ has at least $2n$ zeros. Thus $Mgeq 2n$.



    Definition:



    Given a continuous $2pi$-periodic function $g:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with mean 0, we can find an antiderivative
    begin{equation*}
    widetilde G(x) = int_0^x g(t)dt.
    end{equation*}
    Then the mean zero antiderivative of $g$ is
    begin{equation*}
    G(x) = widetilde G(x) - int_0^{2pi} widetilde{G}(t)dt.
    end{equation*}
    By the $k$th mean zero antiderivative, we mean $f_1$ is the mean zero antiderivative of $f$, $f_2$ is the mean zero antiderivative of $f_1$, and so on.



    Proposition:
    In the series,
    begin{equation}
    f_{4L+1}(t) = sum_{ellgeq n}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)
    end{equation}
    for sufficiently large $L$, all terms except the first are neglibible.



    Proof:
    WLOG assume $a_n$ or $b_n$ is nonzero. Note that
    begin{equation}
    a_n cos(n t)
    +b_n sin(n t)
    end{equation}
    has $2n$ zeros and $2n$ extrema. The absolute value of the extrema is $sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}$. Therefore, we shall make $L$ large enough so that the sum of the other terms is at most $frac{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}{2n^{4L}}$. We have $|a_{ell}|le frac1{sqrt{2pi}}int_0^{2pi}|cos(ell x)f(x)|dxle frac1{sqrt{2pi}}int_0^{2pi}|f(x)|dx$ and the same bound for $|b_{ell}|$, $forallell$. The terms are bounded as follows
    begin{align*}
    left|sum_{ellgeq n+1}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)right|
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    sum_{ellgeq n+1}
    frac{1}{ell^{4L}} \
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    +
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    sum_{ellgeq n+2}
    frac{1}{ell^{4L}}
    right)\
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    int_{n+1}^{infty}
    x^{-4L}
    right)\
    &=
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    frac{1}{(4L-1)(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    right)\
    &leq
    4max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    end{align*}
    Now, we just have to show that
    begin{equation*}
    4max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    leq
    frac{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}{2n^{4L}}
    end{equation*}
    or equivalently
    begin{equation*}
    frac{8nmax_{ell>n }
    {|a_ell|,|b_ell|}}
    {sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}
    leq
    left(
    frac{n+1}{n}
    right)^{4L-1}
    end{equation*}
    The left-hand side is constant, while the right-hand side diverges to $infty$ as $Lrightarrow infty$. Hence the result is true for some $L$.



    Proposition:
    Suppose $f$ has $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Then
    $f_k$ cannot have more zeros than $f$ for all $k$.



    Proof:
    Consider $f_1$ as a differentiable function on the circle $mathbb{T}$. The derivative of $f_1$ is $f$, which has $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Since $f$ is continuous, the derivative of $f_1$ is defined everywhere, so the only critical values of $f_1$ are the zeros of $f$. Let $t_0$ and $t_1$ be any two consecutive zeros of $f$. Then $f_1$ is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing on $[t_0,t_1]$. Hence $f_1$ has at most one zero on this interval. There are $M$ pairs of consecutive zeros of $f$. Hence $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros. A similar argument applies to $f_2$ and so on.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      you are right thank you a lot , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero .
      $endgroup$
      – oty
      Feb 17 '18 at 20:40










    • $begingroup$
      Dear @Dunham , do you mean by the k-th zero mean antiderivative , $f_{k+1}(x)=int_{0}^{x} f_{k}(x) dx$ ?
      $endgroup$
      – oty
      Feb 22 '18 at 5:43










    • $begingroup$
      @ oty I added a comment to clarify
      $endgroup$
      – Dunham
      Feb 22 '18 at 17:15










    • $begingroup$
      "Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros." This is false. $f_1$ has at most $M+1$ zeros. So it does not follow that $Mge 2n$.
      $endgroup$
      – Hans
      Feb 24 '18 at 2:02










    • $begingroup$
      @hans can you provide a counterexample?
      $endgroup$
      – Dunham
      Feb 24 '18 at 2:21
















    6





    +50







    $begingroup$

    original problem



    If $f(t)=cos(t)+sin(t)$ then there are only 2 zeros, yet the conditions are true for any value of $n$.



    Revised problem: proof sketch



    Let $f:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be continuous and $2pi$ periodic with $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Also, suppose $int f(t)e^{ipt}dt=0$ for $|p|<n$.



    Define $f_k$ to be the $k$th zero mean antiderivative of $f$.



    Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros. Similarly, $f_k$ has at most $M$ zeros for all $k$.



    Now, $f_1$ has a convergent Fourier series
    begin{equation}
    f_1(t) = sum_{ellgeq n} a_ell cos(ell t) +b_ell sin(ell t)
    end{equation}



    Then $f_{4L+1}$ has Fourier series
    begin{equation}
    f_{4L+1}(t) = sum_{ellgeq n}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)
    end{equation}



    For $L$ sufficiently large, all terms except the first
    begin{equation}
    frac{a_n}{n^{4L}} cos(n t)
    +frac{b_n}{n^{4L}} sin(n t)
    end{equation}
    are negligible. This first term has $2n$ zeros, so $f_{4L+1}$ has at least $2n$ zeros. Thus $Mgeq 2n$.



    Definition:



    Given a continuous $2pi$-periodic function $g:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with mean 0, we can find an antiderivative
    begin{equation*}
    widetilde G(x) = int_0^x g(t)dt.
    end{equation*}
    Then the mean zero antiderivative of $g$ is
    begin{equation*}
    G(x) = widetilde G(x) - int_0^{2pi} widetilde{G}(t)dt.
    end{equation*}
    By the $k$th mean zero antiderivative, we mean $f_1$ is the mean zero antiderivative of $f$, $f_2$ is the mean zero antiderivative of $f_1$, and so on.



    Proposition:
    In the series,
    begin{equation}
    f_{4L+1}(t) = sum_{ellgeq n}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)
    end{equation}
    for sufficiently large $L$, all terms except the first are neglibible.



    Proof:
    WLOG assume $a_n$ or $b_n$ is nonzero. Note that
    begin{equation}
    a_n cos(n t)
    +b_n sin(n t)
    end{equation}
    has $2n$ zeros and $2n$ extrema. The absolute value of the extrema is $sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}$. Therefore, we shall make $L$ large enough so that the sum of the other terms is at most $frac{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}{2n^{4L}}$. We have $|a_{ell}|le frac1{sqrt{2pi}}int_0^{2pi}|cos(ell x)f(x)|dxle frac1{sqrt{2pi}}int_0^{2pi}|f(x)|dx$ and the same bound for $|b_{ell}|$, $forallell$. The terms are bounded as follows
    begin{align*}
    left|sum_{ellgeq n+1}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)right|
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    sum_{ellgeq n+1}
    frac{1}{ell^{4L}} \
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    +
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    sum_{ellgeq n+2}
    frac{1}{ell^{4L}}
    right)\
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    int_{n+1}^{infty}
    x^{-4L}
    right)\
    &=
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    frac{1}{(4L-1)(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    right)\
    &leq
    4max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    end{align*}
    Now, we just have to show that
    begin{equation*}
    4max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    leq
    frac{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}{2n^{4L}}
    end{equation*}
    or equivalently
    begin{equation*}
    frac{8nmax_{ell>n }
    {|a_ell|,|b_ell|}}
    {sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}
    leq
    left(
    frac{n+1}{n}
    right)^{4L-1}
    end{equation*}
    The left-hand side is constant, while the right-hand side diverges to $infty$ as $Lrightarrow infty$. Hence the result is true for some $L$.



    Proposition:
    Suppose $f$ has $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Then
    $f_k$ cannot have more zeros than $f$ for all $k$.



    Proof:
    Consider $f_1$ as a differentiable function on the circle $mathbb{T}$. The derivative of $f_1$ is $f$, which has $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Since $f$ is continuous, the derivative of $f_1$ is defined everywhere, so the only critical values of $f_1$ are the zeros of $f$. Let $t_0$ and $t_1$ be any two consecutive zeros of $f$. Then $f_1$ is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing on $[t_0,t_1]$. Hence $f_1$ has at most one zero on this interval. There are $M$ pairs of consecutive zeros of $f$. Hence $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros. A similar argument applies to $f_2$ and so on.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      you are right thank you a lot , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero .
      $endgroup$
      – oty
      Feb 17 '18 at 20:40










    • $begingroup$
      Dear @Dunham , do you mean by the k-th zero mean antiderivative , $f_{k+1}(x)=int_{0}^{x} f_{k}(x) dx$ ?
      $endgroup$
      – oty
      Feb 22 '18 at 5:43










    • $begingroup$
      @ oty I added a comment to clarify
      $endgroup$
      – Dunham
      Feb 22 '18 at 17:15










    • $begingroup$
      "Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros." This is false. $f_1$ has at most $M+1$ zeros. So it does not follow that $Mge 2n$.
      $endgroup$
      – Hans
      Feb 24 '18 at 2:02










    • $begingroup$
      @hans can you provide a counterexample?
      $endgroup$
      – Dunham
      Feb 24 '18 at 2:21














    6





    +50







    6





    +50



    6




    +50



    $begingroup$

    original problem



    If $f(t)=cos(t)+sin(t)$ then there are only 2 zeros, yet the conditions are true for any value of $n$.



    Revised problem: proof sketch



    Let $f:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be continuous and $2pi$ periodic with $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Also, suppose $int f(t)e^{ipt}dt=0$ for $|p|<n$.



    Define $f_k$ to be the $k$th zero mean antiderivative of $f$.



    Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros. Similarly, $f_k$ has at most $M$ zeros for all $k$.



    Now, $f_1$ has a convergent Fourier series
    begin{equation}
    f_1(t) = sum_{ellgeq n} a_ell cos(ell t) +b_ell sin(ell t)
    end{equation}



    Then $f_{4L+1}$ has Fourier series
    begin{equation}
    f_{4L+1}(t) = sum_{ellgeq n}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)
    end{equation}



    For $L$ sufficiently large, all terms except the first
    begin{equation}
    frac{a_n}{n^{4L}} cos(n t)
    +frac{b_n}{n^{4L}} sin(n t)
    end{equation}
    are negligible. This first term has $2n$ zeros, so $f_{4L+1}$ has at least $2n$ zeros. Thus $Mgeq 2n$.



    Definition:



    Given a continuous $2pi$-periodic function $g:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with mean 0, we can find an antiderivative
    begin{equation*}
    widetilde G(x) = int_0^x g(t)dt.
    end{equation*}
    Then the mean zero antiderivative of $g$ is
    begin{equation*}
    G(x) = widetilde G(x) - int_0^{2pi} widetilde{G}(t)dt.
    end{equation*}
    By the $k$th mean zero antiderivative, we mean $f_1$ is the mean zero antiderivative of $f$, $f_2$ is the mean zero antiderivative of $f_1$, and so on.



    Proposition:
    In the series,
    begin{equation}
    f_{4L+1}(t) = sum_{ellgeq n}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)
    end{equation}
    for sufficiently large $L$, all terms except the first are neglibible.



    Proof:
    WLOG assume $a_n$ or $b_n$ is nonzero. Note that
    begin{equation}
    a_n cos(n t)
    +b_n sin(n t)
    end{equation}
    has $2n$ zeros and $2n$ extrema. The absolute value of the extrema is $sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}$. Therefore, we shall make $L$ large enough so that the sum of the other terms is at most $frac{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}{2n^{4L}}$. We have $|a_{ell}|le frac1{sqrt{2pi}}int_0^{2pi}|cos(ell x)f(x)|dxle frac1{sqrt{2pi}}int_0^{2pi}|f(x)|dx$ and the same bound for $|b_{ell}|$, $forallell$. The terms are bounded as follows
    begin{align*}
    left|sum_{ellgeq n+1}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)right|
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    sum_{ellgeq n+1}
    frac{1}{ell^{4L}} \
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    +
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    sum_{ellgeq n+2}
    frac{1}{ell^{4L}}
    right)\
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    int_{n+1}^{infty}
    x^{-4L}
    right)\
    &=
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    frac{1}{(4L-1)(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    right)\
    &leq
    4max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    end{align*}
    Now, we just have to show that
    begin{equation*}
    4max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    leq
    frac{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}{2n^{4L}}
    end{equation*}
    or equivalently
    begin{equation*}
    frac{8nmax_{ell>n }
    {|a_ell|,|b_ell|}}
    {sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}
    leq
    left(
    frac{n+1}{n}
    right)^{4L-1}
    end{equation*}
    The left-hand side is constant, while the right-hand side diverges to $infty$ as $Lrightarrow infty$. Hence the result is true for some $L$.



    Proposition:
    Suppose $f$ has $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Then
    $f_k$ cannot have more zeros than $f$ for all $k$.



    Proof:
    Consider $f_1$ as a differentiable function on the circle $mathbb{T}$. The derivative of $f_1$ is $f$, which has $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Since $f$ is continuous, the derivative of $f_1$ is defined everywhere, so the only critical values of $f_1$ are the zeros of $f$. Let $t_0$ and $t_1$ be any two consecutive zeros of $f$. Then $f_1$ is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing on $[t_0,t_1]$. Hence $f_1$ has at most one zero on this interval. There are $M$ pairs of consecutive zeros of $f$. Hence $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros. A similar argument applies to $f_2$ and so on.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    original problem



    If $f(t)=cos(t)+sin(t)$ then there are only 2 zeros, yet the conditions are true for any value of $n$.



    Revised problem: proof sketch



    Let $f:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be continuous and $2pi$ periodic with $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Also, suppose $int f(t)e^{ipt}dt=0$ for $|p|<n$.



    Define $f_k$ to be the $k$th zero mean antiderivative of $f$.



    Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros. Similarly, $f_k$ has at most $M$ zeros for all $k$.



    Now, $f_1$ has a convergent Fourier series
    begin{equation}
    f_1(t) = sum_{ellgeq n} a_ell cos(ell t) +b_ell sin(ell t)
    end{equation}



    Then $f_{4L+1}$ has Fourier series
    begin{equation}
    f_{4L+1}(t) = sum_{ellgeq n}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)
    end{equation}



    For $L$ sufficiently large, all terms except the first
    begin{equation}
    frac{a_n}{n^{4L}} cos(n t)
    +frac{b_n}{n^{4L}} sin(n t)
    end{equation}
    are negligible. This first term has $2n$ zeros, so $f_{4L+1}$ has at least $2n$ zeros. Thus $Mgeq 2n$.



    Definition:



    Given a continuous $2pi$-periodic function $g:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with mean 0, we can find an antiderivative
    begin{equation*}
    widetilde G(x) = int_0^x g(t)dt.
    end{equation*}
    Then the mean zero antiderivative of $g$ is
    begin{equation*}
    G(x) = widetilde G(x) - int_0^{2pi} widetilde{G}(t)dt.
    end{equation*}
    By the $k$th mean zero antiderivative, we mean $f_1$ is the mean zero antiderivative of $f$, $f_2$ is the mean zero antiderivative of $f_1$, and so on.



    Proposition:
    In the series,
    begin{equation}
    f_{4L+1}(t) = sum_{ellgeq n}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)
    end{equation}
    for sufficiently large $L$, all terms except the first are neglibible.



    Proof:
    WLOG assume $a_n$ or $b_n$ is nonzero. Note that
    begin{equation}
    a_n cos(n t)
    +b_n sin(n t)
    end{equation}
    has $2n$ zeros and $2n$ extrema. The absolute value of the extrema is $sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}$. Therefore, we shall make $L$ large enough so that the sum of the other terms is at most $frac{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}{2n^{4L}}$. We have $|a_{ell}|le frac1{sqrt{2pi}}int_0^{2pi}|cos(ell x)f(x)|dxle frac1{sqrt{2pi}}int_0^{2pi}|f(x)|dx$ and the same bound for $|b_{ell}|$, $forallell$. The terms are bounded as follows
    begin{align*}
    left|sum_{ellgeq n+1}
    frac{a_ell}{ell^{4L}} cos(ell t)
    +frac{b_ell}{ell^{4L}} sin(ell t)right|
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    sum_{ellgeq n+1}
    frac{1}{ell^{4L}} \
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    +
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    sum_{ellgeq n+2}
    frac{1}{ell^{4L}}
    right)\
    &leq
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    int_{n+1}^{infty}
    x^{-4L}
    right)\
    &=
    2max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    left(
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L}}
    +
    frac{1}{(4L-1)(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    right)\
    &leq
    4max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    end{align*}
    Now, we just have to show that
    begin{equation*}
    4max_{ell>n }{|a_ell|,|b_ell|}
    frac{1}{(n+1)^{4L-1}}
    leq
    frac{sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}{2n^{4L}}
    end{equation*}
    or equivalently
    begin{equation*}
    frac{8nmax_{ell>n }
    {|a_ell|,|b_ell|}}
    {sqrt{|a_n|^2+|b_n|^2}}
    leq
    left(
    frac{n+1}{n}
    right)^{4L-1}
    end{equation*}
    The left-hand side is constant, while the right-hand side diverges to $infty$ as $Lrightarrow infty$. Hence the result is true for some $L$.



    Proposition:
    Suppose $f$ has $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Then
    $f_k$ cannot have more zeros than $f$ for all $k$.



    Proof:
    Consider $f_1$ as a differentiable function on the circle $mathbb{T}$. The derivative of $f_1$ is $f$, which has $Min mathbb{N}$ zeros. Since $f$ is continuous, the derivative of $f_1$ is defined everywhere, so the only critical values of $f_1$ are the zeros of $f$. Let $t_0$ and $t_1$ be any two consecutive zeros of $f$. Then $f_1$ is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing on $[t_0,t_1]$. Hence $f_1$ has at most one zero on this interval. There are $M$ pairs of consecutive zeros of $f$. Hence $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros. A similar argument applies to $f_2$ and so on.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Mar 2 '18 at 21:55

























    answered Feb 17 '18 at 19:32









    DunhamDunham

    2,084613




    2,084613








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      you are right thank you a lot , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero .
      $endgroup$
      – oty
      Feb 17 '18 at 20:40










    • $begingroup$
      Dear @Dunham , do you mean by the k-th zero mean antiderivative , $f_{k+1}(x)=int_{0}^{x} f_{k}(x) dx$ ?
      $endgroup$
      – oty
      Feb 22 '18 at 5:43










    • $begingroup$
      @ oty I added a comment to clarify
      $endgroup$
      – Dunham
      Feb 22 '18 at 17:15










    • $begingroup$
      "Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros." This is false. $f_1$ has at most $M+1$ zeros. So it does not follow that $Mge 2n$.
      $endgroup$
      – Hans
      Feb 24 '18 at 2:02










    • $begingroup$
      @hans can you provide a counterexample?
      $endgroup$
      – Dunham
      Feb 24 '18 at 2:21














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      you are right thank you a lot , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero .
      $endgroup$
      – oty
      Feb 17 '18 at 20:40










    • $begingroup$
      Dear @Dunham , do you mean by the k-th zero mean antiderivative , $f_{k+1}(x)=int_{0}^{x} f_{k}(x) dx$ ?
      $endgroup$
      – oty
      Feb 22 '18 at 5:43










    • $begingroup$
      @ oty I added a comment to clarify
      $endgroup$
      – Dunham
      Feb 22 '18 at 17:15










    • $begingroup$
      "Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros." This is false. $f_1$ has at most $M+1$ zeros. So it does not follow that $Mge 2n$.
      $endgroup$
      – Hans
      Feb 24 '18 at 2:02










    • $begingroup$
      @hans can you provide a counterexample?
      $endgroup$
      – Dunham
      Feb 24 '18 at 2:21








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    you are right thank you a lot , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero .
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 17 '18 at 20:40




    $begingroup$
    you are right thank you a lot , it's seems that we need both integral to be equal to zero .
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 17 '18 at 20:40












    $begingroup$
    Dear @Dunham , do you mean by the k-th zero mean antiderivative , $f_{k+1}(x)=int_{0}^{x} f_{k}(x) dx$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 22 '18 at 5:43




    $begingroup$
    Dear @Dunham , do you mean by the k-th zero mean antiderivative , $f_{k+1}(x)=int_{0}^{x} f_{k}(x) dx$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – oty
    Feb 22 '18 at 5:43












    $begingroup$
    @ oty I added a comment to clarify
    $endgroup$
    – Dunham
    Feb 22 '18 at 17:15




    $begingroup$
    @ oty I added a comment to clarify
    $endgroup$
    – Dunham
    Feb 22 '18 at 17:15












    $begingroup$
    "Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros." This is false. $f_1$ has at most $M+1$ zeros. So it does not follow that $Mge 2n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hans
    Feb 24 '18 at 2:02




    $begingroup$
    "Since $f_1$ has $M$ critical values, $f_1$ has at most $M$ zeros." This is false. $f_1$ has at most $M+1$ zeros. So it does not follow that $Mge 2n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Hans
    Feb 24 '18 at 2:02












    $begingroup$
    @hans can you provide a counterexample?
    $endgroup$
    – Dunham
    Feb 24 '18 at 2:21




    $begingroup$
    @hans can you provide a counterexample?
    $endgroup$
    – Dunham
    Feb 24 '18 at 2:21











    0












    $begingroup$

    I provide a new solution here for someone who is interested.



    WLOG, assume $f(-pi)=f(pi)neq 0$(if not, just find a $x_0$ s.t. $f(x_0)neq 0$ and do the transform $g(x)=f(x-pi+x_0$).



    Since $f(x)$ is continuous and periodic, there are only even points to change the sign of $f(x)$. Let these points to be
    $$
    x_1<x_2<cdots<x_{2k}.
    $$

    Then construct a function
    $$
    g(x)=left(sin frac{x-x_1}{2}right)cdotleft(sin frac{x-x_2}{2}right)cdotsleft(sin frac{x-x_{2k}}{2}right).
    $$

    Then we get
    begin{equation}
    int_{-pi}^pi f(x)g(x)mathrm{d} x>0. tag{1}label{1}
    end{equation}

    It can be rewritten as
    begin{align}g(x)= &left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_1}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_1}{2}right)cdot left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_2}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_2}{2}right)\
    &cdots left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_{2k}}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_{2k}}{2}right)\
    =&f_1(cos x)sin x+f_2(cos x)tag{2}label{2}
    end{align}

    where $f_1$ and $f_2$ are polynomials and $text{deg}f_1=k-1, text{deg}f_2=k$. These two terms can be written as
    begin{equation}
    f_1(cos x)sin x = a_k sin kx + a_{k-1}sin (k-1)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0tag{3}label{3}
    end{equation}

    begin{equation}
    f_2(cos x) = b_k cos kx + b_{k-1}cos (k-1)x+cdots+b_1cos x + b_0.tag{4}label{4}
    end{equation}

    You can prove it by induction(see the notation below). If degree $kleq n$, we get
    $$
    int_{-pi}^pi f(x)g(x)mathrm{d}x=0
    $$

    by using the condition of the problem.
    It controdicts to the equation eqref{1}. Hence $kgeq n+1$ and the number of roots of $f(x)$ in $[-pi,pi]$ is at least $2n+2$.





    Notation: Assume for any $k<n$, we have
    begin{equation}
    f_1(cos x)sin x = a_k sin kx + a_{k-1}sin (k-1)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0
    end{equation}

    begin{equation}
    f_2(cos x) = b_k cos kx + b_{k-1}cos (k-1)x+cdots+b_1cos x + b_0
    end{equation}

    for all $ f_1, f_2in mathbb{R}_k[x]$.
    Then for all $ g_1, g_2inmathbb{R}_{n}[x]$ , you can extract a $cos x$ and write them as
    $$
    g_1(cos x)sin x = cos x(a_{n-1} sin (n-1)x + a_{n-2}sin (n-2)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0)
    $$

    $$
    g_2(cos x) = cos x(a_{n-1} cos (n-1)x + a_{n-2}cos (n-2)x+cdots+a_1cos x + a_0).
    $$

    Then use the formula
    $$
    cosalphasinbeta=frac{1}{2}left[sin(beta+alpha)+sin(beta-alpha)right]
    $$

    and
    $$
    cosalphacosbeta=frac{1}{2}left[cos(beta+alpha)+cos(beta-alpha)right].
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      I provide a new solution here for someone who is interested.



      WLOG, assume $f(-pi)=f(pi)neq 0$(if not, just find a $x_0$ s.t. $f(x_0)neq 0$ and do the transform $g(x)=f(x-pi+x_0$).



      Since $f(x)$ is continuous and periodic, there are only even points to change the sign of $f(x)$. Let these points to be
      $$
      x_1<x_2<cdots<x_{2k}.
      $$

      Then construct a function
      $$
      g(x)=left(sin frac{x-x_1}{2}right)cdotleft(sin frac{x-x_2}{2}right)cdotsleft(sin frac{x-x_{2k}}{2}right).
      $$

      Then we get
      begin{equation}
      int_{-pi}^pi f(x)g(x)mathrm{d} x>0. tag{1}label{1}
      end{equation}

      It can be rewritten as
      begin{align}g(x)= &left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_1}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_1}{2}right)cdot left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_2}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_2}{2}right)\
      &cdots left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_{2k}}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_{2k}}{2}right)\
      =&f_1(cos x)sin x+f_2(cos x)tag{2}label{2}
      end{align}

      where $f_1$ and $f_2$ are polynomials and $text{deg}f_1=k-1, text{deg}f_2=k$. These two terms can be written as
      begin{equation}
      f_1(cos x)sin x = a_k sin kx + a_{k-1}sin (k-1)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0tag{3}label{3}
      end{equation}

      begin{equation}
      f_2(cos x) = b_k cos kx + b_{k-1}cos (k-1)x+cdots+b_1cos x + b_0.tag{4}label{4}
      end{equation}

      You can prove it by induction(see the notation below). If degree $kleq n$, we get
      $$
      int_{-pi}^pi f(x)g(x)mathrm{d}x=0
      $$

      by using the condition of the problem.
      It controdicts to the equation eqref{1}. Hence $kgeq n+1$ and the number of roots of $f(x)$ in $[-pi,pi]$ is at least $2n+2$.





      Notation: Assume for any $k<n$, we have
      begin{equation}
      f_1(cos x)sin x = a_k sin kx + a_{k-1}sin (k-1)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0
      end{equation}

      begin{equation}
      f_2(cos x) = b_k cos kx + b_{k-1}cos (k-1)x+cdots+b_1cos x + b_0
      end{equation}

      for all $ f_1, f_2in mathbb{R}_k[x]$.
      Then for all $ g_1, g_2inmathbb{R}_{n}[x]$ , you can extract a $cos x$ and write them as
      $$
      g_1(cos x)sin x = cos x(a_{n-1} sin (n-1)x + a_{n-2}sin (n-2)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0)
      $$

      $$
      g_2(cos x) = cos x(a_{n-1} cos (n-1)x + a_{n-2}cos (n-2)x+cdots+a_1cos x + a_0).
      $$

      Then use the formula
      $$
      cosalphasinbeta=frac{1}{2}left[sin(beta+alpha)+sin(beta-alpha)right]
      $$

      and
      $$
      cosalphacosbeta=frac{1}{2}left[cos(beta+alpha)+cos(beta-alpha)right].
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        I provide a new solution here for someone who is interested.



        WLOG, assume $f(-pi)=f(pi)neq 0$(if not, just find a $x_0$ s.t. $f(x_0)neq 0$ and do the transform $g(x)=f(x-pi+x_0$).



        Since $f(x)$ is continuous and periodic, there are only even points to change the sign of $f(x)$. Let these points to be
        $$
        x_1<x_2<cdots<x_{2k}.
        $$

        Then construct a function
        $$
        g(x)=left(sin frac{x-x_1}{2}right)cdotleft(sin frac{x-x_2}{2}right)cdotsleft(sin frac{x-x_{2k}}{2}right).
        $$

        Then we get
        begin{equation}
        int_{-pi}^pi f(x)g(x)mathrm{d} x>0. tag{1}label{1}
        end{equation}

        It can be rewritten as
        begin{align}g(x)= &left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_1}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_1}{2}right)cdot left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_2}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_2}{2}right)\
        &cdots left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_{2k}}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_{2k}}{2}right)\
        =&f_1(cos x)sin x+f_2(cos x)tag{2}label{2}
        end{align}

        where $f_1$ and $f_2$ are polynomials and $text{deg}f_1=k-1, text{deg}f_2=k$. These two terms can be written as
        begin{equation}
        f_1(cos x)sin x = a_k sin kx + a_{k-1}sin (k-1)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0tag{3}label{3}
        end{equation}

        begin{equation}
        f_2(cos x) = b_k cos kx + b_{k-1}cos (k-1)x+cdots+b_1cos x + b_0.tag{4}label{4}
        end{equation}

        You can prove it by induction(see the notation below). If degree $kleq n$, we get
        $$
        int_{-pi}^pi f(x)g(x)mathrm{d}x=0
        $$

        by using the condition of the problem.
        It controdicts to the equation eqref{1}. Hence $kgeq n+1$ and the number of roots of $f(x)$ in $[-pi,pi]$ is at least $2n+2$.





        Notation: Assume for any $k<n$, we have
        begin{equation}
        f_1(cos x)sin x = a_k sin kx + a_{k-1}sin (k-1)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0
        end{equation}

        begin{equation}
        f_2(cos x) = b_k cos kx + b_{k-1}cos (k-1)x+cdots+b_1cos x + b_0
        end{equation}

        for all $ f_1, f_2in mathbb{R}_k[x]$.
        Then for all $ g_1, g_2inmathbb{R}_{n}[x]$ , you can extract a $cos x$ and write them as
        $$
        g_1(cos x)sin x = cos x(a_{n-1} sin (n-1)x + a_{n-2}sin (n-2)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0)
        $$

        $$
        g_2(cos x) = cos x(a_{n-1} cos (n-1)x + a_{n-2}cos (n-2)x+cdots+a_1cos x + a_0).
        $$

        Then use the formula
        $$
        cosalphasinbeta=frac{1}{2}left[sin(beta+alpha)+sin(beta-alpha)right]
        $$

        and
        $$
        cosalphacosbeta=frac{1}{2}left[cos(beta+alpha)+cos(beta-alpha)right].
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        I provide a new solution here for someone who is interested.



        WLOG, assume $f(-pi)=f(pi)neq 0$(if not, just find a $x_0$ s.t. $f(x_0)neq 0$ and do the transform $g(x)=f(x-pi+x_0$).



        Since $f(x)$ is continuous and periodic, there are only even points to change the sign of $f(x)$. Let these points to be
        $$
        x_1<x_2<cdots<x_{2k}.
        $$

        Then construct a function
        $$
        g(x)=left(sin frac{x-x_1}{2}right)cdotleft(sin frac{x-x_2}{2}right)cdotsleft(sin frac{x-x_{2k}}{2}right).
        $$

        Then we get
        begin{equation}
        int_{-pi}^pi f(x)g(x)mathrm{d} x>0. tag{1}label{1}
        end{equation}

        It can be rewritten as
        begin{align}g(x)= &left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_1}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_1}{2}right)cdot left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_2}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_2}{2}right)\
        &cdots left(sin frac{x}{2}cosfrac{x_{2k}}{2}-cosfrac{x}{2}sinfrac{x_{2k}}{2}right)\
        =&f_1(cos x)sin x+f_2(cos x)tag{2}label{2}
        end{align}

        where $f_1$ and $f_2$ are polynomials and $text{deg}f_1=k-1, text{deg}f_2=k$. These two terms can be written as
        begin{equation}
        f_1(cos x)sin x = a_k sin kx + a_{k-1}sin (k-1)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0tag{3}label{3}
        end{equation}

        begin{equation}
        f_2(cos x) = b_k cos kx + b_{k-1}cos (k-1)x+cdots+b_1cos x + b_0.tag{4}label{4}
        end{equation}

        You can prove it by induction(see the notation below). If degree $kleq n$, we get
        $$
        int_{-pi}^pi f(x)g(x)mathrm{d}x=0
        $$

        by using the condition of the problem.
        It controdicts to the equation eqref{1}. Hence $kgeq n+1$ and the number of roots of $f(x)$ in $[-pi,pi]$ is at least $2n+2$.





        Notation: Assume for any $k<n$, we have
        begin{equation}
        f_1(cos x)sin x = a_k sin kx + a_{k-1}sin (k-1)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0
        end{equation}

        begin{equation}
        f_2(cos x) = b_k cos kx + b_{k-1}cos (k-1)x+cdots+b_1cos x + b_0
        end{equation}

        for all $ f_1, f_2in mathbb{R}_k[x]$.
        Then for all $ g_1, g_2inmathbb{R}_{n}[x]$ , you can extract a $cos x$ and write them as
        $$
        g_1(cos x)sin x = cos x(a_{n-1} sin (n-1)x + a_{n-2}sin (n-2)x+cdots+a_1sin x + a_0)
        $$

        $$
        g_2(cos x) = cos x(a_{n-1} cos (n-1)x + a_{n-2}cos (n-2)x+cdots+a_1cos x + a_0).
        $$

        Then use the formula
        $$
        cosalphasinbeta=frac{1}{2}left[sin(beta+alpha)+sin(beta-alpha)right]
        $$

        and
        $$
        cosalphacosbeta=frac{1}{2}left[cos(beta+alpha)+cos(beta-alpha)right].
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 1 '18 at 17:35

























        answered Dec 1 '18 at 16:04









        yahooyahoo

        606412




        606412






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2650748%2fis-the-condition-sufficient%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix