When do we have equality in the third axiom of valuations? [duplicate]












0















This question already has an answer here:




  • How do I compute the discrete valuation of the sum of two elements

    1 answer




Let $R$ be a ring and $v: R to mathbb Z cup {+infty}$ a map that meets following axioms:




  1. $v(a) = +infty iff a=0$

  2. $v(ab) = v(a)+v(b)$

  3. $v(a+b) geq min{v(a),v(b)}$


I have to show that $v(a) neq v(b)$ implies $v(a+b) = min{v(a),v(b)}$, but I have no idea where to begin, can anyone give me some hints?










share|cite|improve this question















marked as duplicate by André 3000, Leucippus, Cesareo, Brahadeesh, max_zorn Nov 27 at 6:01


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.




















    0















    This question already has an answer here:




    • How do I compute the discrete valuation of the sum of two elements

      1 answer




    Let $R$ be a ring and $v: R to mathbb Z cup {+infty}$ a map that meets following axioms:




    1. $v(a) = +infty iff a=0$

    2. $v(ab) = v(a)+v(b)$

    3. $v(a+b) geq min{v(a),v(b)}$


    I have to show that $v(a) neq v(b)$ implies $v(a+b) = min{v(a),v(b)}$, but I have no idea where to begin, can anyone give me some hints?










    share|cite|improve this question















    marked as duplicate by André 3000, Leucippus, Cesareo, Brahadeesh, max_zorn Nov 27 at 6:01


    This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















      0












      0








      0








      This question already has an answer here:




      • How do I compute the discrete valuation of the sum of two elements

        1 answer




      Let $R$ be a ring and $v: R to mathbb Z cup {+infty}$ a map that meets following axioms:




      1. $v(a) = +infty iff a=0$

      2. $v(ab) = v(a)+v(b)$

      3. $v(a+b) geq min{v(a),v(b)}$


      I have to show that $v(a) neq v(b)$ implies $v(a+b) = min{v(a),v(b)}$, but I have no idea where to begin, can anyone give me some hints?










      share|cite|improve this question
















      This question already has an answer here:




      • How do I compute the discrete valuation of the sum of two elements

        1 answer




      Let $R$ be a ring and $v: R to mathbb Z cup {+infty}$ a map that meets following axioms:




      1. $v(a) = +infty iff a=0$

      2. $v(ab) = v(a)+v(b)$

      3. $v(a+b) geq min{v(a),v(b)}$


      I have to show that $v(a) neq v(b)$ implies $v(a+b) = min{v(a),v(b)}$, but I have no idea where to begin, can anyone give me some hints?





      This question already has an answer here:




      • How do I compute the discrete valuation of the sum of two elements

        1 answer








      abstract-algebra valuation-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 26 at 22:28

























      asked Oct 27 '15 at 9:39









      flawr

      11.2k32445




      11.2k32445




      marked as duplicate by André 3000, Leucippus, Cesareo, Brahadeesh, max_zorn Nov 27 at 6:01


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






      marked as duplicate by André 3000, Leucippus, Cesareo, Brahadeesh, max_zorn Nov 27 at 6:01


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Assume $v(a)>v(b)$ and $v(a+b)>v(b)$.
          Then
          $$ v(b)=v((a+b)+(-a))gemin{v(a+b),v(-a)}=min{v(a+b),v(a)}>v(b).$$






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            You should also prove that $v(-a)=v(a)$, but it's easy.
            – egreg
            Oct 27 '15 at 9:58










          • @egreg This would just have been my follow up question, I tried to prove this but I just do not get anywhere, can you give me another hint how to prove $v(-a) = v(a)$?
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:04










          • @hagenvoneitzen Thank you very much for your elegant answer so far!
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:05








          • 1




            @flawr Prove $v(1)=0$, then $v(-1)=0$ follows; therefore $v(-a)=v((-1)a)=v(-1)+v(a)$.
            – egreg
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:21












          • Thank you very much! This seems so easy when you know the solution, but it seems you just have to see it or you'll never see it =)
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:31




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          Assume $v(a)>v(b)$ and $v(a+b)>v(b)$.
          Then
          $$ v(b)=v((a+b)+(-a))gemin{v(a+b),v(-a)}=min{v(a+b),v(a)}>v(b).$$






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            You should also prove that $v(-a)=v(a)$, but it's easy.
            – egreg
            Oct 27 '15 at 9:58










          • @egreg This would just have been my follow up question, I tried to prove this but I just do not get anywhere, can you give me another hint how to prove $v(-a) = v(a)$?
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:04










          • @hagenvoneitzen Thank you very much for your elegant answer so far!
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:05








          • 1




            @flawr Prove $v(1)=0$, then $v(-1)=0$ follows; therefore $v(-a)=v((-1)a)=v(-1)+v(a)$.
            – egreg
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:21












          • Thank you very much! This seems so easy when you know the solution, but it seems you just have to see it or you'll never see it =)
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:31


















          3














          Assume $v(a)>v(b)$ and $v(a+b)>v(b)$.
          Then
          $$ v(b)=v((a+b)+(-a))gemin{v(a+b),v(-a)}=min{v(a+b),v(a)}>v(b).$$






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            You should also prove that $v(-a)=v(a)$, but it's easy.
            – egreg
            Oct 27 '15 at 9:58










          • @egreg This would just have been my follow up question, I tried to prove this but I just do not get anywhere, can you give me another hint how to prove $v(-a) = v(a)$?
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:04










          • @hagenvoneitzen Thank you very much for your elegant answer so far!
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:05








          • 1




            @flawr Prove $v(1)=0$, then $v(-1)=0$ follows; therefore $v(-a)=v((-1)a)=v(-1)+v(a)$.
            – egreg
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:21












          • Thank you very much! This seems so easy when you know the solution, but it seems you just have to see it or you'll never see it =)
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:31
















          3












          3








          3






          Assume $v(a)>v(b)$ and $v(a+b)>v(b)$.
          Then
          $$ v(b)=v((a+b)+(-a))gemin{v(a+b),v(-a)}=min{v(a+b),v(a)}>v(b).$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Assume $v(a)>v(b)$ and $v(a+b)>v(b)$.
          Then
          $$ v(b)=v((a+b)+(-a))gemin{v(a+b),v(-a)}=min{v(a+b),v(a)}>v(b).$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Oct 27 '15 at 9:49









          Hagen von Eitzen

          276k21268495




          276k21268495








          • 1




            You should also prove that $v(-a)=v(a)$, but it's easy.
            – egreg
            Oct 27 '15 at 9:58










          • @egreg This would just have been my follow up question, I tried to prove this but I just do not get anywhere, can you give me another hint how to prove $v(-a) = v(a)$?
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:04










          • @hagenvoneitzen Thank you very much for your elegant answer so far!
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:05








          • 1




            @flawr Prove $v(1)=0$, then $v(-1)=0$ follows; therefore $v(-a)=v((-1)a)=v(-1)+v(a)$.
            – egreg
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:21












          • Thank you very much! This seems so easy when you know the solution, but it seems you just have to see it or you'll never see it =)
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:31
















          • 1




            You should also prove that $v(-a)=v(a)$, but it's easy.
            – egreg
            Oct 27 '15 at 9:58










          • @egreg This would just have been my follow up question, I tried to prove this but I just do not get anywhere, can you give me another hint how to prove $v(-a) = v(a)$?
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:04










          • @hagenvoneitzen Thank you very much for your elegant answer so far!
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:05








          • 1




            @flawr Prove $v(1)=0$, then $v(-1)=0$ follows; therefore $v(-a)=v((-1)a)=v(-1)+v(a)$.
            – egreg
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:21












          • Thank you very much! This seems so easy when you know the solution, but it seems you just have to see it or you'll never see it =)
            – flawr
            Oct 27 '15 at 10:31










          1




          1




          You should also prove that $v(-a)=v(a)$, but it's easy.
          – egreg
          Oct 27 '15 at 9:58




          You should also prove that $v(-a)=v(a)$, but it's easy.
          – egreg
          Oct 27 '15 at 9:58












          @egreg This would just have been my follow up question, I tried to prove this but I just do not get anywhere, can you give me another hint how to prove $v(-a) = v(a)$?
          – flawr
          Oct 27 '15 at 10:04




          @egreg This would just have been my follow up question, I tried to prove this but I just do not get anywhere, can you give me another hint how to prove $v(-a) = v(a)$?
          – flawr
          Oct 27 '15 at 10:04












          @hagenvoneitzen Thank you very much for your elegant answer so far!
          – flawr
          Oct 27 '15 at 10:05






          @hagenvoneitzen Thank you very much for your elegant answer so far!
          – flawr
          Oct 27 '15 at 10:05






          1




          1




          @flawr Prove $v(1)=0$, then $v(-1)=0$ follows; therefore $v(-a)=v((-1)a)=v(-1)+v(a)$.
          – egreg
          Oct 27 '15 at 10:21






          @flawr Prove $v(1)=0$, then $v(-1)=0$ follows; therefore $v(-a)=v((-1)a)=v(-1)+v(a)$.
          – egreg
          Oct 27 '15 at 10:21














          Thank you very much! This seems so easy when you know the solution, but it seems you just have to see it or you'll never see it =)
          – flawr
          Oct 27 '15 at 10:31






          Thank you very much! This seems so easy when you know the solution, but it seems you just have to see it or you'll never see it =)
          – flawr
          Oct 27 '15 at 10:31





          Popular posts from this blog

          Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

          Aardman Animations

          Are they similar matrix