fontspec changes indentation of biblatex bibliography












9














MWE:



test.tex:



% !TeX program = xelatex
documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage[backend=biber,style=authoryear,citestyle=authoryear]{biblatex}
addbibresource{resources.bib}
begin{document}
cite{Test.2018}
printbibliography
end{document}


resources.bib:



@misc{Test.2018,
author = {{Test}},
year = {2018},
title = {Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.}
}


Adding usepackage{fontspec} decreases the indentation of the biblatex entries in the bibliography, removing it increases it again. Why?



I came across this problem after trying to break a long url in the bibliography of an article. The decreased indentation changes the breakpoint. Furthermore it makes the url overflow by one stubborn character even though I set biburllcpenalty and biburlucpenalty accordingly. Without using fontspec there is no overflow.










share|improve this question
























  • Welcome to TeX.SE! I can confirm this with current MiKTeX 2.9 and Windows 8.1. Which tex distribution and OS do you use? Can you add the bibentrx of the article which shows the issue with the url?
    – Kurt
    Dec 16 at 1:41


















9














MWE:



test.tex:



% !TeX program = xelatex
documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage[backend=biber,style=authoryear,citestyle=authoryear]{biblatex}
addbibresource{resources.bib}
begin{document}
cite{Test.2018}
printbibliography
end{document}


resources.bib:



@misc{Test.2018,
author = {{Test}},
year = {2018},
title = {Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.}
}


Adding usepackage{fontspec} decreases the indentation of the biblatex entries in the bibliography, removing it increases it again. Why?



I came across this problem after trying to break a long url in the bibliography of an article. The decreased indentation changes the breakpoint. Furthermore it makes the url overflow by one stubborn character even though I set biburllcpenalty and biburlucpenalty accordingly. Without using fontspec there is no overflow.










share|improve this question
























  • Welcome to TeX.SE! I can confirm this with current MiKTeX 2.9 and Windows 8.1. Which tex distribution and OS do you use? Can you add the bibentrx of the article which shows the issue with the url?
    – Kurt
    Dec 16 at 1:41
















9












9








9







MWE:



test.tex:



% !TeX program = xelatex
documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage[backend=biber,style=authoryear,citestyle=authoryear]{biblatex}
addbibresource{resources.bib}
begin{document}
cite{Test.2018}
printbibliography
end{document}


resources.bib:



@misc{Test.2018,
author = {{Test}},
year = {2018},
title = {Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.}
}


Adding usepackage{fontspec} decreases the indentation of the biblatex entries in the bibliography, removing it increases it again. Why?



I came across this problem after trying to break a long url in the bibliography of an article. The decreased indentation changes the breakpoint. Furthermore it makes the url overflow by one stubborn character even though I set biburllcpenalty and biburlucpenalty accordingly. Without using fontspec there is no overflow.










share|improve this question















MWE:



test.tex:



% !TeX program = xelatex
documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage[backend=biber,style=authoryear,citestyle=authoryear]{biblatex}
addbibresource{resources.bib}
begin{document}
cite{Test.2018}
printbibliography
end{document}


resources.bib:



@misc{Test.2018,
author = {{Test}},
year = {2018},
title = {Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.}
}


Adding usepackage{fontspec} decreases the indentation of the biblatex entries in the bibliography, removing it increases it again. Why?



I came across this problem after trying to break a long url in the bibliography of an article. The decreased indentation changes the breakpoint. Furthermore it makes the url overflow by one stubborn character even though I set biburllcpenalty and biburlucpenalty accordingly. Without using fontspec there is no overflow.







biblatex xetex koma-script fontspec






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 16 at 18:12

























asked Dec 16 at 0:52









Young Un

905




905












  • Welcome to TeX.SE! I can confirm this with current MiKTeX 2.9 and Windows 8.1. Which tex distribution and OS do you use? Can you add the bibentrx of the article which shows the issue with the url?
    – Kurt
    Dec 16 at 1:41




















  • Welcome to TeX.SE! I can confirm this with current MiKTeX 2.9 and Windows 8.1. Which tex distribution and OS do you use? Can you add the bibentrx of the article which shows the issue with the url?
    – Kurt
    Dec 16 at 1:41


















Welcome to TeX.SE! I can confirm this with current MiKTeX 2.9 and Windows 8.1. Which tex distribution and OS do you use? Can you add the bibentrx of the article which shows the issue with the url?
– Kurt
Dec 16 at 1:41






Welcome to TeX.SE! I can confirm this with current MiKTeX 2.9 and Windows 8.1. Which tex distribution and OS do you use? Can you add the bibentrx of the article which shows the issue with the url?
– Kurt
Dec 16 at 1:41












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8














Probably someone who knows KOMA-Script better may be able to give a more precise answer. But, as far as I was able to understand, this behavior hangs on how scrartcl class handles parindent which is, in turn, used by biblatex to set the bibliography hanging indent.



biblatex uses the length bibhang on the bibenvironment of the authoryear style. And it is set in biblatex.def with:



setlength{bibhang}{ifnumequal{parindent}{0}{1em}{parindent}}


Which will set bibhang to parindent but default bibhang to 1em if parindent is 0 for some reason, which is not the case here (that is parindent is not 0, so bibhang actually receives parindent).



Now if we build the document below with XeLaTeX:



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


The PDF will print "12.0pt", but we will find "20.0pt" in the log.



This means that, for some reason, parindent is 20pt in the preamble, and 12pt in the document. biblatex sets bibhang in the preamble, thus, in the absence of other intervening packages, takes the value of 20pt.



Now, if we add fontspec to the document:



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

usepackage{fontspec}

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


We will find "12pt" in both the document and the log. So, if biblatex is called after fontspec, it will receive now the value of 12pt.



This doesn't really mean that fontspec is responsible for this setting on it's own. As far as I grasp, it is more likely bringing some KOMA hook anticipating the setting which would otherwise come "at begin document". For example, if we substitute the call to fontspec with KOMA's recalctypearea, we get the same result: 12pt in both the document and the log.



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

recalctypearea

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


This explains why, in scrartcl class, if you load biblatex after fontspec you get different bibhangs. But I cannot really explain why parindent works the way it does in scrartcl.



Still, as you probably want fontspec anyway in your document, this discussion is more of a curiosity. You woudn't want to remove fontspec just because, by sheer chance (yes, a change in bibhang may trigger an overfull hbox in you url) it allows for a better line break in a single bib entry. So you'll have to look for some other form to break your entry's url (there are several answers in this site on this subject).






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    +1. A very thorough analysis!
    – Mico
    Dec 16 at 6:23








  • 3




    If biblatex uses parindent in the preamble it is a biblatex error. Packages shouldn't expect font dependant values to be correct there.
    – Ulrike Fischer
    Dec 16 at 9:30






  • 1




    See github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/848
    – moewe
    Dec 16 at 10:16










  • @UlrikeFischer See link above. Is there any way to delay the expansion here? I don't want to set the bibhang in the preamble to avoid having to have the user go through AtBeginDocument hooks.
    – moewe
    Dec 16 at 10:23






  • 2




    @YoungUn Some, in no particular order, and non exhaustive: tex.stackexchange.com/q/372003/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/115690/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/15653/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/78093/105447 . If those, or other you may find, do not help, I suggest you ask a new question, then adding the example you later added. Here I focused on your question, as initially posed.
    – gusbrs
    Dec 16 at 17:52











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466036%2ffontspec-changes-indentation-of-biblatex-bibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8














Probably someone who knows KOMA-Script better may be able to give a more precise answer. But, as far as I was able to understand, this behavior hangs on how scrartcl class handles parindent which is, in turn, used by biblatex to set the bibliography hanging indent.



biblatex uses the length bibhang on the bibenvironment of the authoryear style. And it is set in biblatex.def with:



setlength{bibhang}{ifnumequal{parindent}{0}{1em}{parindent}}


Which will set bibhang to parindent but default bibhang to 1em if parindent is 0 for some reason, which is not the case here (that is parindent is not 0, so bibhang actually receives parindent).



Now if we build the document below with XeLaTeX:



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


The PDF will print "12.0pt", but we will find "20.0pt" in the log.



This means that, for some reason, parindent is 20pt in the preamble, and 12pt in the document. biblatex sets bibhang in the preamble, thus, in the absence of other intervening packages, takes the value of 20pt.



Now, if we add fontspec to the document:



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

usepackage{fontspec}

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


We will find "12pt" in both the document and the log. So, if biblatex is called after fontspec, it will receive now the value of 12pt.



This doesn't really mean that fontspec is responsible for this setting on it's own. As far as I grasp, it is more likely bringing some KOMA hook anticipating the setting which would otherwise come "at begin document". For example, if we substitute the call to fontspec with KOMA's recalctypearea, we get the same result: 12pt in both the document and the log.



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

recalctypearea

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


This explains why, in scrartcl class, if you load biblatex after fontspec you get different bibhangs. But I cannot really explain why parindent works the way it does in scrartcl.



Still, as you probably want fontspec anyway in your document, this discussion is more of a curiosity. You woudn't want to remove fontspec just because, by sheer chance (yes, a change in bibhang may trigger an overfull hbox in you url) it allows for a better line break in a single bib entry. So you'll have to look for some other form to break your entry's url (there are several answers in this site on this subject).






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    +1. A very thorough analysis!
    – Mico
    Dec 16 at 6:23








  • 3




    If biblatex uses parindent in the preamble it is a biblatex error. Packages shouldn't expect font dependant values to be correct there.
    – Ulrike Fischer
    Dec 16 at 9:30






  • 1




    See github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/848
    – moewe
    Dec 16 at 10:16










  • @UlrikeFischer See link above. Is there any way to delay the expansion here? I don't want to set the bibhang in the preamble to avoid having to have the user go through AtBeginDocument hooks.
    – moewe
    Dec 16 at 10:23






  • 2




    @YoungUn Some, in no particular order, and non exhaustive: tex.stackexchange.com/q/372003/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/115690/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/15653/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/78093/105447 . If those, or other you may find, do not help, I suggest you ask a new question, then adding the example you later added. Here I focused on your question, as initially posed.
    – gusbrs
    Dec 16 at 17:52
















8














Probably someone who knows KOMA-Script better may be able to give a more precise answer. But, as far as I was able to understand, this behavior hangs on how scrartcl class handles parindent which is, in turn, used by biblatex to set the bibliography hanging indent.



biblatex uses the length bibhang on the bibenvironment of the authoryear style. And it is set in biblatex.def with:



setlength{bibhang}{ifnumequal{parindent}{0}{1em}{parindent}}


Which will set bibhang to parindent but default bibhang to 1em if parindent is 0 for some reason, which is not the case here (that is parindent is not 0, so bibhang actually receives parindent).



Now if we build the document below with XeLaTeX:



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


The PDF will print "12.0pt", but we will find "20.0pt" in the log.



This means that, for some reason, parindent is 20pt in the preamble, and 12pt in the document. biblatex sets bibhang in the preamble, thus, in the absence of other intervening packages, takes the value of 20pt.



Now, if we add fontspec to the document:



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

usepackage{fontspec}

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


We will find "12pt" in both the document and the log. So, if biblatex is called after fontspec, it will receive now the value of 12pt.



This doesn't really mean that fontspec is responsible for this setting on it's own. As far as I grasp, it is more likely bringing some KOMA hook anticipating the setting which would otherwise come "at begin document". For example, if we substitute the call to fontspec with KOMA's recalctypearea, we get the same result: 12pt in both the document and the log.



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

recalctypearea

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


This explains why, in scrartcl class, if you load biblatex after fontspec you get different bibhangs. But I cannot really explain why parindent works the way it does in scrartcl.



Still, as you probably want fontspec anyway in your document, this discussion is more of a curiosity. You woudn't want to remove fontspec just because, by sheer chance (yes, a change in bibhang may trigger an overfull hbox in you url) it allows for a better line break in a single bib entry. So you'll have to look for some other form to break your entry's url (there are several answers in this site on this subject).






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    +1. A very thorough analysis!
    – Mico
    Dec 16 at 6:23








  • 3




    If biblatex uses parindent in the preamble it is a biblatex error. Packages shouldn't expect font dependant values to be correct there.
    – Ulrike Fischer
    Dec 16 at 9:30






  • 1




    See github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/848
    – moewe
    Dec 16 at 10:16










  • @UlrikeFischer See link above. Is there any way to delay the expansion here? I don't want to set the bibhang in the preamble to avoid having to have the user go through AtBeginDocument hooks.
    – moewe
    Dec 16 at 10:23






  • 2




    @YoungUn Some, in no particular order, and non exhaustive: tex.stackexchange.com/q/372003/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/115690/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/15653/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/78093/105447 . If those, or other you may find, do not help, I suggest you ask a new question, then adding the example you later added. Here I focused on your question, as initially posed.
    – gusbrs
    Dec 16 at 17:52














8












8








8






Probably someone who knows KOMA-Script better may be able to give a more precise answer. But, as far as I was able to understand, this behavior hangs on how scrartcl class handles parindent which is, in turn, used by biblatex to set the bibliography hanging indent.



biblatex uses the length bibhang on the bibenvironment of the authoryear style. And it is set in biblatex.def with:



setlength{bibhang}{ifnumequal{parindent}{0}{1em}{parindent}}


Which will set bibhang to parindent but default bibhang to 1em if parindent is 0 for some reason, which is not the case here (that is parindent is not 0, so bibhang actually receives parindent).



Now if we build the document below with XeLaTeX:



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


The PDF will print "12.0pt", but we will find "20.0pt" in the log.



This means that, for some reason, parindent is 20pt in the preamble, and 12pt in the document. biblatex sets bibhang in the preamble, thus, in the absence of other intervening packages, takes the value of 20pt.



Now, if we add fontspec to the document:



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

usepackage{fontspec}

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


We will find "12pt" in both the document and the log. So, if biblatex is called after fontspec, it will receive now the value of 12pt.



This doesn't really mean that fontspec is responsible for this setting on it's own. As far as I grasp, it is more likely bringing some KOMA hook anticipating the setting which would otherwise come "at begin document". For example, if we substitute the call to fontspec with KOMA's recalctypearea, we get the same result: 12pt in both the document and the log.



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

recalctypearea

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


This explains why, in scrartcl class, if you load biblatex after fontspec you get different bibhangs. But I cannot really explain why parindent works the way it does in scrartcl.



Still, as you probably want fontspec anyway in your document, this discussion is more of a curiosity. You woudn't want to remove fontspec just because, by sheer chance (yes, a change in bibhang may trigger an overfull hbox in you url) it allows for a better line break in a single bib entry. So you'll have to look for some other form to break your entry's url (there are several answers in this site on this subject).






share|improve this answer














Probably someone who knows KOMA-Script better may be able to give a more precise answer. But, as far as I was able to understand, this behavior hangs on how scrartcl class handles parindent which is, in turn, used by biblatex to set the bibliography hanging indent.



biblatex uses the length bibhang on the bibenvironment of the authoryear style. And it is set in biblatex.def with:



setlength{bibhang}{ifnumequal{parindent}{0}{1em}{parindent}}


Which will set bibhang to parindent but default bibhang to 1em if parindent is 0 for some reason, which is not the case here (that is parindent is not 0, so bibhang actually receives parindent).



Now if we build the document below with XeLaTeX:



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


The PDF will print "12.0pt", but we will find "20.0pt" in the log.



This means that, for some reason, parindent is 20pt in the preamble, and 12pt in the document. biblatex sets bibhang in the preamble, thus, in the absence of other intervening packages, takes the value of 20pt.



Now, if we add fontspec to the document:



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

usepackage{fontspec}

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


We will find "12pt" in both the document and the log. So, if biblatex is called after fontspec, it will receive now the value of 12pt.



This doesn't really mean that fontspec is responsible for this setting on it's own. As far as I grasp, it is more likely bringing some KOMA hook anticipating the setting which would otherwise come "at begin document". For example, if we substitute the call to fontspec with KOMA's recalctypearea, we get the same result: 12pt in both the document and the log.



documentclass[paper=A4,fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl}

recalctypearea

typeout{theparindent}

begin{document}

theparindent

end{document}


This explains why, in scrartcl class, if you load biblatex after fontspec you get different bibhangs. But I cannot really explain why parindent works the way it does in scrartcl.



Still, as you probably want fontspec anyway in your document, this discussion is more of a curiosity. You woudn't want to remove fontspec just because, by sheer chance (yes, a change in bibhang may trigger an overfull hbox in you url) it allows for a better line break in a single bib entry. So you'll have to look for some other form to break your entry's url (there are several answers in this site on this subject).







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 16 at 2:45

























answered Dec 16 at 2:28









gusbrs

6,9542840




6,9542840








  • 5




    +1. A very thorough analysis!
    – Mico
    Dec 16 at 6:23








  • 3




    If biblatex uses parindent in the preamble it is a biblatex error. Packages shouldn't expect font dependant values to be correct there.
    – Ulrike Fischer
    Dec 16 at 9:30






  • 1




    See github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/848
    – moewe
    Dec 16 at 10:16










  • @UlrikeFischer See link above. Is there any way to delay the expansion here? I don't want to set the bibhang in the preamble to avoid having to have the user go through AtBeginDocument hooks.
    – moewe
    Dec 16 at 10:23






  • 2




    @YoungUn Some, in no particular order, and non exhaustive: tex.stackexchange.com/q/372003/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/115690/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/15653/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/78093/105447 . If those, or other you may find, do not help, I suggest you ask a new question, then adding the example you later added. Here I focused on your question, as initially posed.
    – gusbrs
    Dec 16 at 17:52














  • 5




    +1. A very thorough analysis!
    – Mico
    Dec 16 at 6:23








  • 3




    If biblatex uses parindent in the preamble it is a biblatex error. Packages shouldn't expect font dependant values to be correct there.
    – Ulrike Fischer
    Dec 16 at 9:30






  • 1




    See github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/848
    – moewe
    Dec 16 at 10:16










  • @UlrikeFischer See link above. Is there any way to delay the expansion here? I don't want to set the bibhang in the preamble to avoid having to have the user go through AtBeginDocument hooks.
    – moewe
    Dec 16 at 10:23






  • 2




    @YoungUn Some, in no particular order, and non exhaustive: tex.stackexchange.com/q/372003/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/115690/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/15653/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/78093/105447 . If those, or other you may find, do not help, I suggest you ask a new question, then adding the example you later added. Here I focused on your question, as initially posed.
    – gusbrs
    Dec 16 at 17:52








5




5




+1. A very thorough analysis!
– Mico
Dec 16 at 6:23






+1. A very thorough analysis!
– Mico
Dec 16 at 6:23






3




3




If biblatex uses parindent in the preamble it is a biblatex error. Packages shouldn't expect font dependant values to be correct there.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 16 at 9:30




If biblatex uses parindent in the preamble it is a biblatex error. Packages shouldn't expect font dependant values to be correct there.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 16 at 9:30




1




1




See github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/848
– moewe
Dec 16 at 10:16




See github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/848
– moewe
Dec 16 at 10:16












@UlrikeFischer See link above. Is there any way to delay the expansion here? I don't want to set the bibhang in the preamble to avoid having to have the user go through AtBeginDocument hooks.
– moewe
Dec 16 at 10:23




@UlrikeFischer See link above. Is there any way to delay the expansion here? I don't want to set the bibhang in the preamble to avoid having to have the user go through AtBeginDocument hooks.
– moewe
Dec 16 at 10:23




2




2




@YoungUn Some, in no particular order, and non exhaustive: tex.stackexchange.com/q/372003/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/115690/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/15653/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/78093/105447 . If those, or other you may find, do not help, I suggest you ask a new question, then adding the example you later added. Here I focused on your question, as initially posed.
– gusbrs
Dec 16 at 17:52




@YoungUn Some, in no particular order, and non exhaustive: tex.stackexchange.com/q/372003/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/115690/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/15653/105447 ; tex.stackexchange.com/q/78093/105447 . If those, or other you may find, do not help, I suggest you ask a new question, then adding the example you later added. Here I focused on your question, as initially posed.
– gusbrs
Dec 16 at 17:52


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466036%2ffontspec-changes-indentation-of-biblatex-bibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix