What does modular space $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ mean?












2














Juts a quick question. In Freitag's Complex Analysis as an example for The Quotient Topology it comes:




The "modular space" $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}).$




Every element in $mathbb{H}$ can be mapped by a linear fractional transformation in $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ to some fixed element ${{tau_0}}$ in $mathbb{H}$ so is it true to say $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong {{tau_0}}$? So basically a modular space is just any single point in $mathbb{H}$?



I have a little background in Modular Forms so much appreciated a simple explanation.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • $Gamma = mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ is a group of biholomorphisms $mathbb{H}to mathbb{H}$. Let $ Gamma tau = { gamma tau, gamma in Gamma}$ a subset of $mathbb{H}$. Then $Gamma setminus mathbb{H} = { Gamma tau, tau in mathbb{H}}$ is a topological space whose points are subsets of $mathbb{H}$. The topology is the complex topology inherited from $mathbb{H}$ so it is a Riemann surface. For any $Gamma tau$ there is a representative with $gammatau in mathcal{F}$ the fundamental domain mentioned by carmichael.
    – reuns
    Nov 27 at 0:20


















2














Juts a quick question. In Freitag's Complex Analysis as an example for The Quotient Topology it comes:




The "modular space" $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}).$




Every element in $mathbb{H}$ can be mapped by a linear fractional transformation in $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ to some fixed element ${{tau_0}}$ in $mathbb{H}$ so is it true to say $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong {{tau_0}}$? So basically a modular space is just any single point in $mathbb{H}$?



I have a little background in Modular Forms so much appreciated a simple explanation.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • $Gamma = mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ is a group of biholomorphisms $mathbb{H}to mathbb{H}$. Let $ Gamma tau = { gamma tau, gamma in Gamma}$ a subset of $mathbb{H}$. Then $Gamma setminus mathbb{H} = { Gamma tau, tau in mathbb{H}}$ is a topological space whose points are subsets of $mathbb{H}$. The topology is the complex topology inherited from $mathbb{H}$ so it is a Riemann surface. For any $Gamma tau$ there is a representative with $gammatau in mathcal{F}$ the fundamental domain mentioned by carmichael.
    – reuns
    Nov 27 at 0:20
















2












2








2


1





Juts a quick question. In Freitag's Complex Analysis as an example for The Quotient Topology it comes:




The "modular space" $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}).$




Every element in $mathbb{H}$ can be mapped by a linear fractional transformation in $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ to some fixed element ${{tau_0}}$ in $mathbb{H}$ so is it true to say $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong {{tau_0}}$? So basically a modular space is just any single point in $mathbb{H}$?



I have a little background in Modular Forms so much appreciated a simple explanation.










share|cite|improve this question















Juts a quick question. In Freitag's Complex Analysis as an example for The Quotient Topology it comes:




The "modular space" $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}).$




Every element in $mathbb{H}$ can be mapped by a linear fractional transformation in $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ to some fixed element ${{tau_0}}$ in $mathbb{H}$ so is it true to say $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong {{tau_0}}$? So basically a modular space is just any single point in $mathbb{H}$?



I have a little background in Modular Forms so much appreciated a simple explanation.







general-topology complex-analysis quotient-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 27 at 0:15

























asked Nov 26 at 23:59









72D

564116




564116












  • $Gamma = mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ is a group of biholomorphisms $mathbb{H}to mathbb{H}$. Let $ Gamma tau = { gamma tau, gamma in Gamma}$ a subset of $mathbb{H}$. Then $Gamma setminus mathbb{H} = { Gamma tau, tau in mathbb{H}}$ is a topological space whose points are subsets of $mathbb{H}$. The topology is the complex topology inherited from $mathbb{H}$ so it is a Riemann surface. For any $Gamma tau$ there is a representative with $gammatau in mathcal{F}$ the fundamental domain mentioned by carmichael.
    – reuns
    Nov 27 at 0:20




















  • $Gamma = mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ is a group of biholomorphisms $mathbb{H}to mathbb{H}$. Let $ Gamma tau = { gamma tau, gamma in Gamma}$ a subset of $mathbb{H}$. Then $Gamma setminus mathbb{H} = { Gamma tau, tau in mathbb{H}}$ is a topological space whose points are subsets of $mathbb{H}$. The topology is the complex topology inherited from $mathbb{H}$ so it is a Riemann surface. For any $Gamma tau$ there is a representative with $gammatau in mathcal{F}$ the fundamental domain mentioned by carmichael.
    – reuns
    Nov 27 at 0:20


















$Gamma = mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ is a group of biholomorphisms $mathbb{H}to mathbb{H}$. Let $ Gamma tau = { gamma tau, gamma in Gamma}$ a subset of $mathbb{H}$. Then $Gamma setminus mathbb{H} = { Gamma tau, tau in mathbb{H}}$ is a topological space whose points are subsets of $mathbb{H}$. The topology is the complex topology inherited from $mathbb{H}$ so it is a Riemann surface. For any $Gamma tau$ there is a representative with $gammatau in mathcal{F}$ the fundamental domain mentioned by carmichael.
– reuns
Nov 27 at 0:20






$Gamma = mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ is a group of biholomorphisms $mathbb{H}to mathbb{H}$. Let $ Gamma tau = { gamma tau, gamma in Gamma}$ a subset of $mathbb{H}$. Then $Gamma setminus mathbb{H} = { Gamma tau, tau in mathbb{H}}$ is a topological space whose points are subsets of $mathbb{H}$. The topology is the complex topology inherited from $mathbb{H}$ so it is a Riemann surface. For any $Gamma tau$ there is a representative with $gammatau in mathcal{F}$ the fundamental domain mentioned by carmichael.
– reuns
Nov 27 at 0:20












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














While all elements of $mathbb{H}$ are $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$-equivalent, this is no longer the case if $mathbb{R}$ is replaced by $mathbb{Z}$. If (as you say) you have some background in modular forms, you've likely seen a picture of the standard fundamental domain for the modular group:
$$ mathcal{F}={z=x+iy:y>0,-frac{1}{2}leq xleq frac{1}{2},|z|geq 1}$$
You can visualize the quotient space by gluing together the boundary of $mathcal{F}$: the points $-frac{1}{2}+y$ and $frac{1}{2}+y$ are identified, as are $z$ and $-frac{1}{z}$ if $zinmathcal{F},|z|=1$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yes I made a mistake about $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ with $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ and I know the $mathcal{F}$. But for clarification: so is it true that $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R}) cong$ any single point in $mathbb{H}$; and $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}$?
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:18












  • Yes, the quotient $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ can be identified with a single point
    – carmichael561
    Nov 27 at 0:19










  • And $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}?$
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:20












  • Not sure what $cong$ means in this context. And don't forget that the boundary of $mathcal{F}$ must be handled correctly.
    – carmichael561
    Nov 27 at 0:21










  • ≅ means that the two spaces are homemorphic.
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:22











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015123%2fwhat-does-modular-space-mathbbh-mathrmsl-2-mathbbz-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














While all elements of $mathbb{H}$ are $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$-equivalent, this is no longer the case if $mathbb{R}$ is replaced by $mathbb{Z}$. If (as you say) you have some background in modular forms, you've likely seen a picture of the standard fundamental domain for the modular group:
$$ mathcal{F}={z=x+iy:y>0,-frac{1}{2}leq xleq frac{1}{2},|z|geq 1}$$
You can visualize the quotient space by gluing together the boundary of $mathcal{F}$: the points $-frac{1}{2}+y$ and $frac{1}{2}+y$ are identified, as are $z$ and $-frac{1}{z}$ if $zinmathcal{F},|z|=1$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yes I made a mistake about $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ with $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ and I know the $mathcal{F}$. But for clarification: so is it true that $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R}) cong$ any single point in $mathbb{H}$; and $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}$?
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:18












  • Yes, the quotient $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ can be identified with a single point
    – carmichael561
    Nov 27 at 0:19










  • And $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}?$
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:20












  • Not sure what $cong$ means in this context. And don't forget that the boundary of $mathcal{F}$ must be handled correctly.
    – carmichael561
    Nov 27 at 0:21










  • ≅ means that the two spaces are homemorphic.
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:22
















1














While all elements of $mathbb{H}$ are $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$-equivalent, this is no longer the case if $mathbb{R}$ is replaced by $mathbb{Z}$. If (as you say) you have some background in modular forms, you've likely seen a picture of the standard fundamental domain for the modular group:
$$ mathcal{F}={z=x+iy:y>0,-frac{1}{2}leq xleq frac{1}{2},|z|geq 1}$$
You can visualize the quotient space by gluing together the boundary of $mathcal{F}$: the points $-frac{1}{2}+y$ and $frac{1}{2}+y$ are identified, as are $z$ and $-frac{1}{z}$ if $zinmathcal{F},|z|=1$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yes I made a mistake about $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ with $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ and I know the $mathcal{F}$. But for clarification: so is it true that $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R}) cong$ any single point in $mathbb{H}$; and $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}$?
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:18












  • Yes, the quotient $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ can be identified with a single point
    – carmichael561
    Nov 27 at 0:19










  • And $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}?$
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:20












  • Not sure what $cong$ means in this context. And don't forget that the boundary of $mathcal{F}$ must be handled correctly.
    – carmichael561
    Nov 27 at 0:21










  • ≅ means that the two spaces are homemorphic.
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:22














1












1








1






While all elements of $mathbb{H}$ are $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$-equivalent, this is no longer the case if $mathbb{R}$ is replaced by $mathbb{Z}$. If (as you say) you have some background in modular forms, you've likely seen a picture of the standard fundamental domain for the modular group:
$$ mathcal{F}={z=x+iy:y>0,-frac{1}{2}leq xleq frac{1}{2},|z|geq 1}$$
You can visualize the quotient space by gluing together the boundary of $mathcal{F}$: the points $-frac{1}{2}+y$ and $frac{1}{2}+y$ are identified, as are $z$ and $-frac{1}{z}$ if $zinmathcal{F},|z|=1$.






share|cite|improve this answer












While all elements of $mathbb{H}$ are $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$-equivalent, this is no longer the case if $mathbb{R}$ is replaced by $mathbb{Z}$. If (as you say) you have some background in modular forms, you've likely seen a picture of the standard fundamental domain for the modular group:
$$ mathcal{F}={z=x+iy:y>0,-frac{1}{2}leq xleq frac{1}{2},|z|geq 1}$$
You can visualize the quotient space by gluing together the boundary of $mathcal{F}$: the points $-frac{1}{2}+y$ and $frac{1}{2}+y$ are identified, as are $z$ and $-frac{1}{z}$ if $zinmathcal{F},|z|=1$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 27 at 0:09









carmichael561

46.9k54382




46.9k54382












  • Yes I made a mistake about $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ with $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ and I know the $mathcal{F}$. But for clarification: so is it true that $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R}) cong$ any single point in $mathbb{H}$; and $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}$?
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:18












  • Yes, the quotient $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ can be identified with a single point
    – carmichael561
    Nov 27 at 0:19










  • And $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}?$
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:20












  • Not sure what $cong$ means in this context. And don't forget that the boundary of $mathcal{F}$ must be handled correctly.
    – carmichael561
    Nov 27 at 0:21










  • ≅ means that the two spaces are homemorphic.
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:22


















  • Yes I made a mistake about $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ with $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ and I know the $mathcal{F}$. But for clarification: so is it true that $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R}) cong$ any single point in $mathbb{H}$; and $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}$?
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:18












  • Yes, the quotient $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ can be identified with a single point
    – carmichael561
    Nov 27 at 0:19










  • And $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}?$
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:20












  • Not sure what $cong$ means in this context. And don't forget that the boundary of $mathcal{F}$ must be handled correctly.
    – carmichael561
    Nov 27 at 0:21










  • ≅ means that the two spaces are homemorphic.
    – 72D
    Nov 27 at 0:22
















Yes I made a mistake about $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ with $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ and I know the $mathcal{F}$. But for clarification: so is it true that $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R}) cong$ any single point in $mathbb{H}$; and $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}$?
– 72D
Nov 27 at 0:18






Yes I made a mistake about $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ with $mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z})$ and I know the $mathcal{F}$. But for clarification: so is it true that $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R}) cong$ any single point in $mathbb{H}$; and $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}$?
– 72D
Nov 27 at 0:18














Yes, the quotient $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ can be identified with a single point
– carmichael561
Nov 27 at 0:19




Yes, the quotient $mathbb{H}/mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{R})$ can be identified with a single point
– carmichael561
Nov 27 at 0:19












And $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}?$
– 72D
Nov 27 at 0:20






And $mathbb{H}/ mathrm{SL}_2(mathbb{Z}) cong mathcal{F}?$
– 72D
Nov 27 at 0:20














Not sure what $cong$ means in this context. And don't forget that the boundary of $mathcal{F}$ must be handled correctly.
– carmichael561
Nov 27 at 0:21




Not sure what $cong$ means in this context. And don't forget that the boundary of $mathcal{F}$ must be handled correctly.
– carmichael561
Nov 27 at 0:21












≅ means that the two spaces are homemorphic.
– 72D
Nov 27 at 0:22




≅ means that the two spaces are homemorphic.
– 72D
Nov 27 at 0:22


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015123%2fwhat-does-modular-space-mathbbh-mathrmsl-2-mathbbz-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix