0-chain Boundary












0














Can anyone explain how adding two vertices in a connected graph to create a $0$-Chain is the boundary of some 1-dimensional chain? I know that the definition of boundary is the collection of $n+1$ faces, and each face is an $n-1$ simplice, but can someone explain the connection?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Can anyone explain how adding two vertices in a connected graph to create a $0$-Chain is the boundary of some 1-dimensional chain? I know that the definition of boundary is the collection of $n+1$ faces, and each face is an $n-1$ simplice, but can someone explain the connection?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Can anyone explain how adding two vertices in a connected graph to create a $0$-Chain is the boundary of some 1-dimensional chain? I know that the definition of boundary is the collection of $n+1$ faces, and each face is an $n-1$ simplice, but can someone explain the connection?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Can anyone explain how adding two vertices in a connected graph to create a $0$-Chain is the boundary of some 1-dimensional chain? I know that the definition of boundary is the collection of $n+1$ faces, and each face is an $n-1$ simplice, but can someone explain the connection?







      topological-data-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 27 at 0:26









      LexyFidds

      226




      226






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Yes. Suppose the two vertices are $u$ and $w$. Since the graph is connected, then there is a path
          $$u=v_0,v_1,v_2,ldots,v_{k-2},v_{k-1},v_k=w$$
          of vertices in the graph, connecting vertex $u$ to $w$, such that an edge exists in the graph between $v_i$ and $v_{i+1}$ for all $i$. Hence,
          $$[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k]$$
          is a 1-chain. Its boundary, with $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, is
          begin{align}
          &partial([v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k])\
          =&partial[v_0,v_1]+partial[v_1,v_2]+ldots+partial[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+partial[v_{k-1},v_k]\
          =&(v_0+v_1)+(v_1+v_2)+ldots+(v_{k-2}+v_{k-1})+(v_{k-1}+v_k)\
          =&v_0+2v_1+2v_1+ldots+2v_{k-2}+2v_{k-1}+v_k\
          =&v_0+v_k
          end{align}

          since we are using $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients. So we have found a 1-chain whose boundary is $v_0+v_k=u+w$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015152%2f0-chain-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Yes. Suppose the two vertices are $u$ and $w$. Since the graph is connected, then there is a path
            $$u=v_0,v_1,v_2,ldots,v_{k-2},v_{k-1},v_k=w$$
            of vertices in the graph, connecting vertex $u$ to $w$, such that an edge exists in the graph between $v_i$ and $v_{i+1}$ for all $i$. Hence,
            $$[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k]$$
            is a 1-chain. Its boundary, with $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, is
            begin{align}
            &partial([v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k])\
            =&partial[v_0,v_1]+partial[v_1,v_2]+ldots+partial[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+partial[v_{k-1},v_k]\
            =&(v_0+v_1)+(v_1+v_2)+ldots+(v_{k-2}+v_{k-1})+(v_{k-1}+v_k)\
            =&v_0+2v_1+2v_1+ldots+2v_{k-2}+2v_{k-1}+v_k\
            =&v_0+v_k
            end{align}

            since we are using $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients. So we have found a 1-chain whose boundary is $v_0+v_k=u+w$.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              Yes. Suppose the two vertices are $u$ and $w$. Since the graph is connected, then there is a path
              $$u=v_0,v_1,v_2,ldots,v_{k-2},v_{k-1},v_k=w$$
              of vertices in the graph, connecting vertex $u$ to $w$, such that an edge exists in the graph between $v_i$ and $v_{i+1}$ for all $i$. Hence,
              $$[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k]$$
              is a 1-chain. Its boundary, with $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, is
              begin{align}
              &partial([v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k])\
              =&partial[v_0,v_1]+partial[v_1,v_2]+ldots+partial[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+partial[v_{k-1},v_k]\
              =&(v_0+v_1)+(v_1+v_2)+ldots+(v_{k-2}+v_{k-1})+(v_{k-1}+v_k)\
              =&v_0+2v_1+2v_1+ldots+2v_{k-2}+2v_{k-1}+v_k\
              =&v_0+v_k
              end{align}

              since we are using $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients. So we have found a 1-chain whose boundary is $v_0+v_k=u+w$.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                Yes. Suppose the two vertices are $u$ and $w$. Since the graph is connected, then there is a path
                $$u=v_0,v_1,v_2,ldots,v_{k-2},v_{k-1},v_k=w$$
                of vertices in the graph, connecting vertex $u$ to $w$, such that an edge exists in the graph between $v_i$ and $v_{i+1}$ for all $i$. Hence,
                $$[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k]$$
                is a 1-chain. Its boundary, with $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, is
                begin{align}
                &partial([v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k])\
                =&partial[v_0,v_1]+partial[v_1,v_2]+ldots+partial[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+partial[v_{k-1},v_k]\
                =&(v_0+v_1)+(v_1+v_2)+ldots+(v_{k-2}+v_{k-1})+(v_{k-1}+v_k)\
                =&v_0+2v_1+2v_1+ldots+2v_{k-2}+2v_{k-1}+v_k\
                =&v_0+v_k
                end{align}

                since we are using $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients. So we have found a 1-chain whose boundary is $v_0+v_k=u+w$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Yes. Suppose the two vertices are $u$ and $w$. Since the graph is connected, then there is a path
                $$u=v_0,v_1,v_2,ldots,v_{k-2},v_{k-1},v_k=w$$
                of vertices in the graph, connecting vertex $u$ to $w$, such that an edge exists in the graph between $v_i$ and $v_{i+1}$ for all $i$. Hence,
                $$[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k]$$
                is a 1-chain. Its boundary, with $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, is
                begin{align}
                &partial([v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+ldots+[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+[v_{k-1},v_k])\
                =&partial[v_0,v_1]+partial[v_1,v_2]+ldots+partial[v_{k-2},v_{k-1}]+partial[v_{k-1},v_k]\
                =&(v_0+v_1)+(v_1+v_2)+ldots+(v_{k-2}+v_{k-1})+(v_{k-1}+v_k)\
                =&v_0+2v_1+2v_1+ldots+2v_{k-2}+2v_{k-1}+v_k\
                =&v_0+v_k
                end{align}

                since we are using $mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$ coefficients. So we have found a 1-chain whose boundary is $v_0+v_k=u+w$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 29 at 14:06









                Henry Adams

                1164




                1164






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015152%2f0-chain-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                    Aardman Animations

                    Are they similar matrix