scp between two remote hosts from my (third) pc
up vote
114
down vote
favorite
I have two remote hosts.
host1-> 10.3.0.1
host2-> 10.3.0.2
Both run an ssh server.
The ssh server listens on port 22 in host1 and on port 6969 in host2.
Now, using my local machine, I need to copy something from host1 to host2 without logging into either host1 or host2 via ssh. Something like,
scp user@10.3.0.1:/path/to/file user@10.3.0.2/path/to/file
How can I do this, please note that the two hosts use different ports for ssh.
linux networking ssh shell scp
add a comment |
up vote
114
down vote
favorite
I have two remote hosts.
host1-> 10.3.0.1
host2-> 10.3.0.2
Both run an ssh server.
The ssh server listens on port 22 in host1 and on port 6969 in host2.
Now, using my local machine, I need to copy something from host1 to host2 without logging into either host1 or host2 via ssh. Something like,
scp user@10.3.0.1:/path/to/file user@10.3.0.2/path/to/file
How can I do this, please note that the two hosts use different ports for ssh.
linux networking ssh shell scp
Are you asking if you can transfer from a remote host to a remote host, or are you asking how to do it without having to supply a password?
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:22
While the-P
flag exists to specify the port to use, in case of remote-to-remote transfer, ssh as no defined behaviour on how to specify per-host port...
– mveroone
Dec 10 '13 at 15:14
add a comment |
up vote
114
down vote
favorite
up vote
114
down vote
favorite
I have two remote hosts.
host1-> 10.3.0.1
host2-> 10.3.0.2
Both run an ssh server.
The ssh server listens on port 22 in host1 and on port 6969 in host2.
Now, using my local machine, I need to copy something from host1 to host2 without logging into either host1 or host2 via ssh. Something like,
scp user@10.3.0.1:/path/to/file user@10.3.0.2/path/to/file
How can I do this, please note that the two hosts use different ports for ssh.
linux networking ssh shell scp
I have two remote hosts.
host1-> 10.3.0.1
host2-> 10.3.0.2
Both run an ssh server.
The ssh server listens on port 22 in host1 and on port 6969 in host2.
Now, using my local machine, I need to copy something from host1 to host2 without logging into either host1 or host2 via ssh. Something like,
scp user@10.3.0.1:/path/to/file user@10.3.0.2/path/to/file
How can I do this, please note that the two hosts use different ports for ssh.
linux networking ssh shell scp
linux networking ssh shell scp
edited Jun 27 '17 at 13:09
7ochem
155111
155111
asked Dec 10 '13 at 13:49
uwais ibrahim
671264
671264
Are you asking if you can transfer from a remote host to a remote host, or are you asking how to do it without having to supply a password?
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:22
While the-P
flag exists to specify the port to use, in case of remote-to-remote transfer, ssh as no defined behaviour on how to specify per-host port...
– mveroone
Dec 10 '13 at 15:14
add a comment |
Are you asking if you can transfer from a remote host to a remote host, or are you asking how to do it without having to supply a password?
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:22
While the-P
flag exists to specify the port to use, in case of remote-to-remote transfer, ssh as no defined behaviour on how to specify per-host port...
– mveroone
Dec 10 '13 at 15:14
Are you asking if you can transfer from a remote host to a remote host, or are you asking how to do it without having to supply a password?
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:22
Are you asking if you can transfer from a remote host to a remote host, or are you asking how to do it without having to supply a password?
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:22
While the
-P
flag exists to specify the port to use, in case of remote-to-remote transfer, ssh as no defined behaviour on how to specify per-host port...– mveroone
Dec 10 '13 at 15:14
While the
-P
flag exists to specify the port to use, in case of remote-to-remote transfer, ssh as no defined behaviour on how to specify per-host port...– mveroone
Dec 10 '13 at 15:14
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
189
down vote
In the past, the way in which scp
worked, when called (naively) to copy files between remote systems, was very inconvenient: if you wrote, for instance
scp user1@remote1:/home/user1/file1.txt user2@remote2:/home/user2/file1.txt
scp
would first open an ssh
session on remote1, and then it would run scp
from there to remote2. For this to work, you would have to set up the authorization credentials for remote2 on remote1.
The modern way to do it, instead, ("modern" because it was implemented only a few years ago, and perhaps not everybody has a -3
-capable scp
) requires two steps. The first necessary step is to use ~/.ssh/config
to set up all options for the connection to both remote1 and remote2, as follows:
Host remote1.example.org
Port 2222
IdentityFile /path/to/host1-id_rsa
Host remote2.example.org
Port 6969
IdentityFile /path/to/host2-id_rsa
This way it becomes possible to pass all necessary options to the command without ambiguities: for instance, if we had said on the CLI use port 2222 without the above configuration, it would have been unclear whether we were referring to remote1 or to remote2, and likewise for the file containing the cryptgraphic keys. This way the CLI remains tidy and simple.
Secondly, use the -3
option, as follows:
scp -3 user1@remote1:/home/user1/file1.txt user2@remote2:/home/user2/file1.txt
The -3
option instructs scp
to route traffic through the PC on which the command is issued, even though it is a 3rd party to the transfer. This way, authorization credentials must reside only on the issuing PC, the third party.
6
For future reference: If you copy a file between two hosts that share an identity file (like an EC2 instance), then you don't need the config file. One -i argument is sufficient to connect to both hosts.
– Artur Czajka
Aug 8 '14 at 8:13
1
Also worth noting, for Google Compute Engine, there is support for adding to your~/.ssh/config
file: cloud.google.com/compute/docs/gcloud-compute but I don't think that AWS has the same support
– modulitos
Dec 28 '14 at 8:36
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Last time I tried this, scp wasn't able to do that. Your command line looks okay. This workaround will work:
ssh -p port_on_machine1 user@machine1 "cat /path/to/file/one"|ssh -p port_on_machine2 user@machine2 "cat >/path/to/file/two"
my scp man page says "Copies between two remote hosts are also permitted."
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:23
1
Thanks, it is good to hear. To scp you can give a -P flag (it was written by some BSD people, this because its argument handling is so tragic :-( ), but it seems you can't specify different ports on the remote hosts. I am sorry, but I think, only this workaround lefts (or there are a lot of trickier solutions, using ssh but avoiding scp - for example, sftpfs, but they are not the simplest). I extended my workaround with the port settings.
– peterh
Dec 10 '13 at 15:11
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
In my case, I was doing a remote to remote copy, withouth the -3
argument.
The port given with the '-P' parameter works with the 1st server, but port 22 is used with the 2nd one.
ssh -P 1234 user@server1.mydomain.com user@server2.otherdomain.com
The solution is to edit the /etc/ssh/ssh_config
file in server1
and add these lines:
Host *.otherdomain.com
Port 1234
In this way, the port 1234 is used for both of them. It could be different too.
This solution has better throughput than previous solutions, because communitation is direct.
perez is there a way to achieve scp through two different ports for the two different remote machines from the comman line?
– Red Bottle
Aug 30 at 9:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The source and target can be specified as a URI in the form scp://[user@]host[:port][/path]
so you can run:
scp -3 scp://user@10.3.0.1:22/path/to/file scp://user@10.3.0.2:6969/path/to/file
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
189
down vote
In the past, the way in which scp
worked, when called (naively) to copy files between remote systems, was very inconvenient: if you wrote, for instance
scp user1@remote1:/home/user1/file1.txt user2@remote2:/home/user2/file1.txt
scp
would first open an ssh
session on remote1, and then it would run scp
from there to remote2. For this to work, you would have to set up the authorization credentials for remote2 on remote1.
The modern way to do it, instead, ("modern" because it was implemented only a few years ago, and perhaps not everybody has a -3
-capable scp
) requires two steps. The first necessary step is to use ~/.ssh/config
to set up all options for the connection to both remote1 and remote2, as follows:
Host remote1.example.org
Port 2222
IdentityFile /path/to/host1-id_rsa
Host remote2.example.org
Port 6969
IdentityFile /path/to/host2-id_rsa
This way it becomes possible to pass all necessary options to the command without ambiguities: for instance, if we had said on the CLI use port 2222 without the above configuration, it would have been unclear whether we were referring to remote1 or to remote2, and likewise for the file containing the cryptgraphic keys. This way the CLI remains tidy and simple.
Secondly, use the -3
option, as follows:
scp -3 user1@remote1:/home/user1/file1.txt user2@remote2:/home/user2/file1.txt
The -3
option instructs scp
to route traffic through the PC on which the command is issued, even though it is a 3rd party to the transfer. This way, authorization credentials must reside only on the issuing PC, the third party.
6
For future reference: If you copy a file between two hosts that share an identity file (like an EC2 instance), then you don't need the config file. One -i argument is sufficient to connect to both hosts.
– Artur Czajka
Aug 8 '14 at 8:13
1
Also worth noting, for Google Compute Engine, there is support for adding to your~/.ssh/config
file: cloud.google.com/compute/docs/gcloud-compute but I don't think that AWS has the same support
– modulitos
Dec 28 '14 at 8:36
add a comment |
up vote
189
down vote
In the past, the way in which scp
worked, when called (naively) to copy files between remote systems, was very inconvenient: if you wrote, for instance
scp user1@remote1:/home/user1/file1.txt user2@remote2:/home/user2/file1.txt
scp
would first open an ssh
session on remote1, and then it would run scp
from there to remote2. For this to work, you would have to set up the authorization credentials for remote2 on remote1.
The modern way to do it, instead, ("modern" because it was implemented only a few years ago, and perhaps not everybody has a -3
-capable scp
) requires two steps. The first necessary step is to use ~/.ssh/config
to set up all options for the connection to both remote1 and remote2, as follows:
Host remote1.example.org
Port 2222
IdentityFile /path/to/host1-id_rsa
Host remote2.example.org
Port 6969
IdentityFile /path/to/host2-id_rsa
This way it becomes possible to pass all necessary options to the command without ambiguities: for instance, if we had said on the CLI use port 2222 without the above configuration, it would have been unclear whether we were referring to remote1 or to remote2, and likewise for the file containing the cryptgraphic keys. This way the CLI remains tidy and simple.
Secondly, use the -3
option, as follows:
scp -3 user1@remote1:/home/user1/file1.txt user2@remote2:/home/user2/file1.txt
The -3
option instructs scp
to route traffic through the PC on which the command is issued, even though it is a 3rd party to the transfer. This way, authorization credentials must reside only on the issuing PC, the third party.
6
For future reference: If you copy a file between two hosts that share an identity file (like an EC2 instance), then you don't need the config file. One -i argument is sufficient to connect to both hosts.
– Artur Czajka
Aug 8 '14 at 8:13
1
Also worth noting, for Google Compute Engine, there is support for adding to your~/.ssh/config
file: cloud.google.com/compute/docs/gcloud-compute but I don't think that AWS has the same support
– modulitos
Dec 28 '14 at 8:36
add a comment |
up vote
189
down vote
up vote
189
down vote
In the past, the way in which scp
worked, when called (naively) to copy files between remote systems, was very inconvenient: if you wrote, for instance
scp user1@remote1:/home/user1/file1.txt user2@remote2:/home/user2/file1.txt
scp
would first open an ssh
session on remote1, and then it would run scp
from there to remote2. For this to work, you would have to set up the authorization credentials for remote2 on remote1.
The modern way to do it, instead, ("modern" because it was implemented only a few years ago, and perhaps not everybody has a -3
-capable scp
) requires two steps. The first necessary step is to use ~/.ssh/config
to set up all options for the connection to both remote1 and remote2, as follows:
Host remote1.example.org
Port 2222
IdentityFile /path/to/host1-id_rsa
Host remote2.example.org
Port 6969
IdentityFile /path/to/host2-id_rsa
This way it becomes possible to pass all necessary options to the command without ambiguities: for instance, if we had said on the CLI use port 2222 without the above configuration, it would have been unclear whether we were referring to remote1 or to remote2, and likewise for the file containing the cryptgraphic keys. This way the CLI remains tidy and simple.
Secondly, use the -3
option, as follows:
scp -3 user1@remote1:/home/user1/file1.txt user2@remote2:/home/user2/file1.txt
The -3
option instructs scp
to route traffic through the PC on which the command is issued, even though it is a 3rd party to the transfer. This way, authorization credentials must reside only on the issuing PC, the third party.
In the past, the way in which scp
worked, when called (naively) to copy files between remote systems, was very inconvenient: if you wrote, for instance
scp user1@remote1:/home/user1/file1.txt user2@remote2:/home/user2/file1.txt
scp
would first open an ssh
session on remote1, and then it would run scp
from there to remote2. For this to work, you would have to set up the authorization credentials for remote2 on remote1.
The modern way to do it, instead, ("modern" because it was implemented only a few years ago, and perhaps not everybody has a -3
-capable scp
) requires two steps. The first necessary step is to use ~/.ssh/config
to set up all options for the connection to both remote1 and remote2, as follows:
Host remote1.example.org
Port 2222
IdentityFile /path/to/host1-id_rsa
Host remote2.example.org
Port 6969
IdentityFile /path/to/host2-id_rsa
This way it becomes possible to pass all necessary options to the command without ambiguities: for instance, if we had said on the CLI use port 2222 without the above configuration, it would have been unclear whether we were referring to remote1 or to remote2, and likewise for the file containing the cryptgraphic keys. This way the CLI remains tidy and simple.
Secondly, use the -3
option, as follows:
scp -3 user1@remote1:/home/user1/file1.txt user2@remote2:/home/user2/file1.txt
The -3
option instructs scp
to route traffic through the PC on which the command is issued, even though it is a 3rd party to the transfer. This way, authorization credentials must reside only on the issuing PC, the third party.
edited Feb 10 '17 at 6:57
answered Dec 10 '13 at 18:32
MariusMatutiae
37.9k95195
37.9k95195
6
For future reference: If you copy a file between two hosts that share an identity file (like an EC2 instance), then you don't need the config file. One -i argument is sufficient to connect to both hosts.
– Artur Czajka
Aug 8 '14 at 8:13
1
Also worth noting, for Google Compute Engine, there is support for adding to your~/.ssh/config
file: cloud.google.com/compute/docs/gcloud-compute but I don't think that AWS has the same support
– modulitos
Dec 28 '14 at 8:36
add a comment |
6
For future reference: If you copy a file between two hosts that share an identity file (like an EC2 instance), then you don't need the config file. One -i argument is sufficient to connect to both hosts.
– Artur Czajka
Aug 8 '14 at 8:13
1
Also worth noting, for Google Compute Engine, there is support for adding to your~/.ssh/config
file: cloud.google.com/compute/docs/gcloud-compute but I don't think that AWS has the same support
– modulitos
Dec 28 '14 at 8:36
6
6
For future reference: If you copy a file between two hosts that share an identity file (like an EC2 instance), then you don't need the config file. One -i argument is sufficient to connect to both hosts.
– Artur Czajka
Aug 8 '14 at 8:13
For future reference: If you copy a file between two hosts that share an identity file (like an EC2 instance), then you don't need the config file. One -i argument is sufficient to connect to both hosts.
– Artur Czajka
Aug 8 '14 at 8:13
1
1
Also worth noting, for Google Compute Engine, there is support for adding to your
~/.ssh/config
file: cloud.google.com/compute/docs/gcloud-compute but I don't think that AWS has the same support– modulitos
Dec 28 '14 at 8:36
Also worth noting, for Google Compute Engine, there is support for adding to your
~/.ssh/config
file: cloud.google.com/compute/docs/gcloud-compute but I don't think that AWS has the same support– modulitos
Dec 28 '14 at 8:36
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Last time I tried this, scp wasn't able to do that. Your command line looks okay. This workaround will work:
ssh -p port_on_machine1 user@machine1 "cat /path/to/file/one"|ssh -p port_on_machine2 user@machine2 "cat >/path/to/file/two"
my scp man page says "Copies between two remote hosts are also permitted."
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:23
1
Thanks, it is good to hear. To scp you can give a -P flag (it was written by some BSD people, this because its argument handling is so tragic :-( ), but it seems you can't specify different ports on the remote hosts. I am sorry, but I think, only this workaround lefts (or there are a lot of trickier solutions, using ssh but avoiding scp - for example, sftpfs, but they are not the simplest). I extended my workaround with the port settings.
– peterh
Dec 10 '13 at 15:11
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
Last time I tried this, scp wasn't able to do that. Your command line looks okay. This workaround will work:
ssh -p port_on_machine1 user@machine1 "cat /path/to/file/one"|ssh -p port_on_machine2 user@machine2 "cat >/path/to/file/two"
my scp man page says "Copies between two remote hosts are also permitted."
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:23
1
Thanks, it is good to hear. To scp you can give a -P flag (it was written by some BSD people, this because its argument handling is so tragic :-( ), but it seems you can't specify different ports on the remote hosts. I am sorry, but I think, only this workaround lefts (or there are a lot of trickier solutions, using ssh but avoiding scp - for example, sftpfs, but they are not the simplest). I extended my workaround with the port settings.
– peterh
Dec 10 '13 at 15:11
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
Last time I tried this, scp wasn't able to do that. Your command line looks okay. This workaround will work:
ssh -p port_on_machine1 user@machine1 "cat /path/to/file/one"|ssh -p port_on_machine2 user@machine2 "cat >/path/to/file/two"
Last time I tried this, scp wasn't able to do that. Your command line looks okay. This workaround will work:
ssh -p port_on_machine1 user@machine1 "cat /path/to/file/one"|ssh -p port_on_machine2 user@machine2 "cat >/path/to/file/two"
edited Aug 22 '16 at 18:33
MariusMatutiae
37.9k95195
37.9k95195
answered Dec 10 '13 at 14:17
peterh
1,36482137
1,36482137
my scp man page says "Copies between two remote hosts are also permitted."
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:23
1
Thanks, it is good to hear. To scp you can give a -P flag (it was written by some BSD people, this because its argument handling is so tragic :-( ), but it seems you can't specify different ports on the remote hosts. I am sorry, but I think, only this workaround lefts (or there are a lot of trickier solutions, using ssh but avoiding scp - for example, sftpfs, but they are not the simplest). I extended my workaround with the port settings.
– peterh
Dec 10 '13 at 15:11
add a comment |
my scp man page says "Copies between two remote hosts are also permitted."
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:23
1
Thanks, it is good to hear. To scp you can give a -P flag (it was written by some BSD people, this because its argument handling is so tragic :-( ), but it seems you can't specify different ports on the remote hosts. I am sorry, but I think, only this workaround lefts (or there are a lot of trickier solutions, using ssh but avoiding scp - for example, sftpfs, but they are not the simplest). I extended my workaround with the port settings.
– peterh
Dec 10 '13 at 15:11
my scp man page says "Copies between two remote hosts are also permitted."
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:23
my scp man page says "Copies between two remote hosts are also permitted."
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:23
1
1
Thanks, it is good to hear. To scp you can give a -P flag (it was written by some BSD people, this because its argument handling is so tragic :-( ), but it seems you can't specify different ports on the remote hosts. I am sorry, but I think, only this workaround lefts (or there are a lot of trickier solutions, using ssh but avoiding scp - for example, sftpfs, but they are not the simplest). I extended my workaround with the port settings.
– peterh
Dec 10 '13 at 15:11
Thanks, it is good to hear. To scp you can give a -P flag (it was written by some BSD people, this because its argument handling is so tragic :-( ), but it seems you can't specify different ports on the remote hosts. I am sorry, but I think, only this workaround lefts (or there are a lot of trickier solutions, using ssh but avoiding scp - for example, sftpfs, but they are not the simplest). I extended my workaround with the port settings.
– peterh
Dec 10 '13 at 15:11
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
In my case, I was doing a remote to remote copy, withouth the -3
argument.
The port given with the '-P' parameter works with the 1st server, but port 22 is used with the 2nd one.
ssh -P 1234 user@server1.mydomain.com user@server2.otherdomain.com
The solution is to edit the /etc/ssh/ssh_config
file in server1
and add these lines:
Host *.otherdomain.com
Port 1234
In this way, the port 1234 is used for both of them. It could be different too.
This solution has better throughput than previous solutions, because communitation is direct.
perez is there a way to achieve scp through two different ports for the two different remote machines from the comman line?
– Red Bottle
Aug 30 at 9:26
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
In my case, I was doing a remote to remote copy, withouth the -3
argument.
The port given with the '-P' parameter works with the 1st server, but port 22 is used with the 2nd one.
ssh -P 1234 user@server1.mydomain.com user@server2.otherdomain.com
The solution is to edit the /etc/ssh/ssh_config
file in server1
and add these lines:
Host *.otherdomain.com
Port 1234
In this way, the port 1234 is used for both of them. It could be different too.
This solution has better throughput than previous solutions, because communitation is direct.
perez is there a way to achieve scp through two different ports for the two different remote machines from the comman line?
– Red Bottle
Aug 30 at 9:26
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
In my case, I was doing a remote to remote copy, withouth the -3
argument.
The port given with the '-P' parameter works with the 1st server, but port 22 is used with the 2nd one.
ssh -P 1234 user@server1.mydomain.com user@server2.otherdomain.com
The solution is to edit the /etc/ssh/ssh_config
file in server1
and add these lines:
Host *.otherdomain.com
Port 1234
In this way, the port 1234 is used for both of them. It could be different too.
This solution has better throughput than previous solutions, because communitation is direct.
In my case, I was doing a remote to remote copy, withouth the -3
argument.
The port given with the '-P' parameter works with the 1st server, but port 22 is used with the 2nd one.
ssh -P 1234 user@server1.mydomain.com user@server2.otherdomain.com
The solution is to edit the /etc/ssh/ssh_config
file in server1
and add these lines:
Host *.otherdomain.com
Port 1234
In this way, the port 1234 is used for both of them. It could be different too.
This solution has better throughput than previous solutions, because communitation is direct.
edited Jan 27 '16 at 7:47
answered Jan 26 '16 at 14:18
david.perez
15810
15810
perez is there a way to achieve scp through two different ports for the two different remote machines from the comman line?
– Red Bottle
Aug 30 at 9:26
add a comment |
perez is there a way to achieve scp through two different ports for the two different remote machines from the comman line?
– Red Bottle
Aug 30 at 9:26
perez is there a way to achieve scp through two different ports for the two different remote machines from the comman line?
– Red Bottle
Aug 30 at 9:26
perez is there a way to achieve scp through two different ports for the two different remote machines from the comman line?
– Red Bottle
Aug 30 at 9:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The source and target can be specified as a URI in the form scp://[user@]host[:port][/path]
so you can run:
scp -3 scp://user@10.3.0.1:22/path/to/file scp://user@10.3.0.2:6969/path/to/file
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The source and target can be specified as a URI in the form scp://[user@]host[:port][/path]
so you can run:
scp -3 scp://user@10.3.0.1:22/path/to/file scp://user@10.3.0.2:6969/path/to/file
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The source and target can be specified as a URI in the form scp://[user@]host[:port][/path]
so you can run:
scp -3 scp://user@10.3.0.1:22/path/to/file scp://user@10.3.0.2:6969/path/to/file
The source and target can be specified as a URI in the form scp://[user@]host[:port][/path]
so you can run:
scp -3 scp://user@10.3.0.1:22/path/to/file scp://user@10.3.0.2:6969/path/to/file
answered Dec 3 at 15:41
user3403199
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f686394%2fscp-between-two-remote-hosts-from-my-third-pc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are you asking if you can transfer from a remote host to a remote host, or are you asking how to do it without having to supply a password?
– glenn jackman
Dec 10 '13 at 14:22
While the
-P
flag exists to specify the port to use, in case of remote-to-remote transfer, ssh as no defined behaviour on how to specify per-host port...– mveroone
Dec 10 '13 at 15:14