PsExec treats second remote computer in list as a program name











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












PsExec behaves very strangely when run on a specific server



When I use PsExec to run a program on multiple remote machines in most cases, it works perfectly fine. When I run the same command on one specific machine, it treats the second server provided in the comma-separated list like it's a program name.



Here's my call to the remote servers:



psexec \server11111,server11112 /accepteula -u "DomainUser" -p "password" -i 2 -d cmd.exe /c "wmic bios getsmbiosbiosversion"


And here's the output:



PsExec v2.11 - Execute processes remotely
Copyright (C) 2001-2014 Mark Russinovich
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com

PsExec could not start server11112 on server11111:
The system cannot find the file specified


This command works fine when I run it on my dev machine. However, when I run the same command from a server running Windows 2012, it fails and I get the output above.










share|improve this question
























  • The name of the computer might be the key, it might have a special character which might need to be escaped.
    – davidbaumann
    Dec 3 at 16:25










  • @davidbaumann the names will always be like "harvest99999". They'll only have the server type and number with no special characters.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 17:19










  • @TwistyImpersonator I am not. The PsExec spec shows that you only have to put the backslashes once for a comma-separated computer list.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 17:20












  • @TwistyImpersonator Done. The description should be functionally equivalent to what I'm doing now.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 19:08










  • Much better. This command works for me if I remove the backslash preceding psexec (is that just a formatting mistake)?. Does session #2 actually exist on both target machines?
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 3 at 19:42















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












PsExec behaves very strangely when run on a specific server



When I use PsExec to run a program on multiple remote machines in most cases, it works perfectly fine. When I run the same command on one specific machine, it treats the second server provided in the comma-separated list like it's a program name.



Here's my call to the remote servers:



psexec \server11111,server11112 /accepteula -u "DomainUser" -p "password" -i 2 -d cmd.exe /c "wmic bios getsmbiosbiosversion"


And here's the output:



PsExec v2.11 - Execute processes remotely
Copyright (C) 2001-2014 Mark Russinovich
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com

PsExec could not start server11112 on server11111:
The system cannot find the file specified


This command works fine when I run it on my dev machine. However, when I run the same command from a server running Windows 2012, it fails and I get the output above.










share|improve this question
























  • The name of the computer might be the key, it might have a special character which might need to be escaped.
    – davidbaumann
    Dec 3 at 16:25










  • @davidbaumann the names will always be like "harvest99999". They'll only have the server type and number with no special characters.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 17:19










  • @TwistyImpersonator I am not. The PsExec spec shows that you only have to put the backslashes once for a comma-separated computer list.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 17:20












  • @TwistyImpersonator Done. The description should be functionally equivalent to what I'm doing now.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 19:08










  • Much better. This command works for me if I remove the backslash preceding psexec (is that just a formatting mistake)?. Does session #2 actually exist on both target machines?
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 3 at 19:42













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











PsExec behaves very strangely when run on a specific server



When I use PsExec to run a program on multiple remote machines in most cases, it works perfectly fine. When I run the same command on one specific machine, it treats the second server provided in the comma-separated list like it's a program name.



Here's my call to the remote servers:



psexec \server11111,server11112 /accepteula -u "DomainUser" -p "password" -i 2 -d cmd.exe /c "wmic bios getsmbiosbiosversion"


And here's the output:



PsExec v2.11 - Execute processes remotely
Copyright (C) 2001-2014 Mark Russinovich
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com

PsExec could not start server11112 on server11111:
The system cannot find the file specified


This command works fine when I run it on my dev machine. However, when I run the same command from a server running Windows 2012, it fails and I get the output above.










share|improve this question















PsExec behaves very strangely when run on a specific server



When I use PsExec to run a program on multiple remote machines in most cases, it works perfectly fine. When I run the same command on one specific machine, it treats the second server provided in the comma-separated list like it's a program name.



Here's my call to the remote servers:



psexec \server11111,server11112 /accepteula -u "DomainUser" -p "password" -i 2 -d cmd.exe /c "wmic bios getsmbiosbiosversion"


And here's the output:



PsExec v2.11 - Execute processes remotely
Copyright (C) 2001-2014 Mark Russinovich
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com

PsExec could not start server11112 on server11111:
The system cannot find the file specified


This command works fine when I run it on my dev machine. However, when I run the same command from a server running Windows 2012, it fails and I get the output above.







powershell psexec sysinternals






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 3 at 20:57

























asked Dec 3 at 15:58









Jason Fox

12




12












  • The name of the computer might be the key, it might have a special character which might need to be escaped.
    – davidbaumann
    Dec 3 at 16:25










  • @davidbaumann the names will always be like "harvest99999". They'll only have the server type and number with no special characters.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 17:19










  • @TwistyImpersonator I am not. The PsExec spec shows that you only have to put the backslashes once for a comma-separated computer list.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 17:20












  • @TwistyImpersonator Done. The description should be functionally equivalent to what I'm doing now.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 19:08










  • Much better. This command works for me if I remove the backslash preceding psexec (is that just a formatting mistake)?. Does session #2 actually exist on both target machines?
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 3 at 19:42


















  • The name of the computer might be the key, it might have a special character which might need to be escaped.
    – davidbaumann
    Dec 3 at 16:25










  • @davidbaumann the names will always be like "harvest99999". They'll only have the server type and number with no special characters.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 17:19










  • @TwistyImpersonator I am not. The PsExec spec shows that you only have to put the backslashes once for a comma-separated computer list.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 17:20












  • @TwistyImpersonator Done. The description should be functionally equivalent to what I'm doing now.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 3 at 19:08










  • Much better. This command works for me if I remove the backslash preceding psexec (is that just a formatting mistake)?. Does session #2 actually exist on both target machines?
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 3 at 19:42
















The name of the computer might be the key, it might have a special character which might need to be escaped.
– davidbaumann
Dec 3 at 16:25




The name of the computer might be the key, it might have a special character which might need to be escaped.
– davidbaumann
Dec 3 at 16:25












@davidbaumann the names will always be like "harvest99999". They'll only have the server type and number with no special characters.
– Jason Fox
Dec 3 at 17:19




@davidbaumann the names will always be like "harvest99999". They'll only have the server type and number with no special characters.
– Jason Fox
Dec 3 at 17:19












@TwistyImpersonator I am not. The PsExec spec shows that you only have to put the backslashes once for a comma-separated computer list.
– Jason Fox
Dec 3 at 17:20






@TwistyImpersonator I am not. The PsExec spec shows that you only have to put the backslashes once for a comma-separated computer list.
– Jason Fox
Dec 3 at 17:20














@TwistyImpersonator Done. The description should be functionally equivalent to what I'm doing now.
– Jason Fox
Dec 3 at 19:08




@TwistyImpersonator Done. The description should be functionally equivalent to what I'm doing now.
– Jason Fox
Dec 3 at 19:08












Much better. This command works for me if I remove the backslash preceding psexec (is that just a formatting mistake)?. Does session #2 actually exist on both target machines?
– Twisty Impersonator
Dec 3 at 19:42




Much better. This command works for me if I remove the backslash preceding psexec (is that just a formatting mistake)?. Does session #2 actually exist on both target machines?
– Twisty Impersonator
Dec 3 at 19:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
-1
down vote













Maybe you have a non-displaying character after the comma. I get the exact same




PsExec could not start <server2> on <server1>:




error if I have a space after the comma.






share|improve this answer























  • Do you know what characters could be non-displaying in powershell? It is acting as if there were a space there, because putting double quotes around the entire server list fixes it for some reason.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 4 at 15:38










  • In other contexts, the Zero-Width Space and Left-To-Right Mark are the ones that have tripped me up. You can try saving the string to a file and opening it with a hex editor, like Frhed to see what character might be hiding in there.
    – Doug Deden
    Dec 4 at 22:34











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380430%2fpsexec-treats-second-remote-computer-in-list-as-a-program-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
-1
down vote













Maybe you have a non-displaying character after the comma. I get the exact same




PsExec could not start <server2> on <server1>:




error if I have a space after the comma.






share|improve this answer























  • Do you know what characters could be non-displaying in powershell? It is acting as if there were a space there, because putting double quotes around the entire server list fixes it for some reason.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 4 at 15:38










  • In other contexts, the Zero-Width Space and Left-To-Right Mark are the ones that have tripped me up. You can try saving the string to a file and opening it with a hex editor, like Frhed to see what character might be hiding in there.
    – Doug Deden
    Dec 4 at 22:34















up vote
-1
down vote













Maybe you have a non-displaying character after the comma. I get the exact same




PsExec could not start <server2> on <server1>:




error if I have a space after the comma.






share|improve this answer























  • Do you know what characters could be non-displaying in powershell? It is acting as if there were a space there, because putting double quotes around the entire server list fixes it for some reason.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 4 at 15:38










  • In other contexts, the Zero-Width Space and Left-To-Right Mark are the ones that have tripped me up. You can try saving the string to a file and opening it with a hex editor, like Frhed to see what character might be hiding in there.
    – Doug Deden
    Dec 4 at 22:34













up vote
-1
down vote










up vote
-1
down vote









Maybe you have a non-displaying character after the comma. I get the exact same




PsExec could not start <server2> on <server1>:




error if I have a space after the comma.






share|improve this answer














Maybe you have a non-displaying character after the comma. I get the exact same




PsExec could not start <server2> on <server1>:




error if I have a space after the comma.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 at 23:43

























answered Dec 3 at 23:21









Doug Deden

13




13












  • Do you know what characters could be non-displaying in powershell? It is acting as if there were a space there, because putting double quotes around the entire server list fixes it for some reason.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 4 at 15:38










  • In other contexts, the Zero-Width Space and Left-To-Right Mark are the ones that have tripped me up. You can try saving the string to a file and opening it with a hex editor, like Frhed to see what character might be hiding in there.
    – Doug Deden
    Dec 4 at 22:34


















  • Do you know what characters could be non-displaying in powershell? It is acting as if there were a space there, because putting double quotes around the entire server list fixes it for some reason.
    – Jason Fox
    Dec 4 at 15:38










  • In other contexts, the Zero-Width Space and Left-To-Right Mark are the ones that have tripped me up. You can try saving the string to a file and opening it with a hex editor, like Frhed to see what character might be hiding in there.
    – Doug Deden
    Dec 4 at 22:34
















Do you know what characters could be non-displaying in powershell? It is acting as if there were a space there, because putting double quotes around the entire server list fixes it for some reason.
– Jason Fox
Dec 4 at 15:38




Do you know what characters could be non-displaying in powershell? It is acting as if there were a space there, because putting double quotes around the entire server list fixes it for some reason.
– Jason Fox
Dec 4 at 15:38












In other contexts, the Zero-Width Space and Left-To-Right Mark are the ones that have tripped me up. You can try saving the string to a file and opening it with a hex editor, like Frhed to see what character might be hiding in there.
– Doug Deden
Dec 4 at 22:34




In other contexts, the Zero-Width Space and Left-To-Right Mark are the ones that have tripped me up. You can try saving the string to a file and opening it with a hex editor, like Frhed to see what character might be hiding in there.
– Doug Deden
Dec 4 at 22:34


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380430%2fpsexec-treats-second-remote-computer-in-list-as-a-program-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix