Is the largest root of a parametrized family of polynomials again polynomial?












2














$newcommand{a}{alpha} newcommand{bb}{mathbb}$
Let $a = (a_0, dots, a_{n-1}) in bb R^n$ be fixed. We consider the parametrized family of monic polynomials
$$ f(r, z) = z^n + ra_{n-1} z^{n-1} + dots + r a_1 z + r a_0,$$
where $r in bb R$.



For each $r in bb R$, let $L(r)$ denote the largest root. My question is whether $L(r)$ is a polynomial in $r$. By Vieta's formula, for each $r$, we can represent all the roots as a polynomial in $r$. I am not sure if some crossing happened in the roots, this is still true.










share|cite|improve this question





























    2














    $newcommand{a}{alpha} newcommand{bb}{mathbb}$
    Let $a = (a_0, dots, a_{n-1}) in bb R^n$ be fixed. We consider the parametrized family of monic polynomials
    $$ f(r, z) = z^n + ra_{n-1} z^{n-1} + dots + r a_1 z + r a_0,$$
    where $r in bb R$.



    For each $r in bb R$, let $L(r)$ denote the largest root. My question is whether $L(r)$ is a polynomial in $r$. By Vieta's formula, for each $r$, we can represent all the roots as a polynomial in $r$. I am not sure if some crossing happened in the roots, this is still true.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2







      $newcommand{a}{alpha} newcommand{bb}{mathbb}$
      Let $a = (a_0, dots, a_{n-1}) in bb R^n$ be fixed. We consider the parametrized family of monic polynomials
      $$ f(r, z) = z^n + ra_{n-1} z^{n-1} + dots + r a_1 z + r a_0,$$
      where $r in bb R$.



      For each $r in bb R$, let $L(r)$ denote the largest root. My question is whether $L(r)$ is a polynomial in $r$. By Vieta's formula, for each $r$, we can represent all the roots as a polynomial in $r$. I am not sure if some crossing happened in the roots, this is still true.










      share|cite|improve this question















      $newcommand{a}{alpha} newcommand{bb}{mathbb}$
      Let $a = (a_0, dots, a_{n-1}) in bb R^n$ be fixed. We consider the parametrized family of monic polynomials
      $$ f(r, z) = z^n + ra_{n-1} z^{n-1} + dots + r a_1 z + r a_0,$$
      where $r in bb R$.



      For each $r in bb R$, let $L(r)$ denote the largest root. My question is whether $L(r)$ is a polynomial in $r$. By Vieta's formula, for each $r$, we can represent all the roots as a polynomial in $r$. I am not sure if some crossing happened in the roots, this is still true.







      linear-algebra abstract-algebra polynomials






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 26 at 17:47

























      asked Nov 26 at 17:10









      user1101010

      7551630




      7551630






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Consider $n = 2,$ and the case $f(r, z) = z^2 - rz = z(z-r)$, i.e., $a_1 = -1, a_0 = 0$.



          The largest root is $r$ (for $r ge 0$), but $0$ for $r < 0$. The function



          $$
          h(r) = begin{cases}
          r & r ge 0 \
          0 & r < 0
          end{cases}
          $$

          is not differentiable at zero, hence not a polynomial.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for your nice answer. May I ask another question: I am looking for the zeros of $L(r) - 1$ and your example shows it is not a polynomial in $t$. But I am still hoping the number of the zeros is bounded. Could you comment on this part? Thanks.
            – user1101010
            Nov 26 at 18:36













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014607%2fis-the-largest-root-of-a-parametrized-family-of-polynomials-again-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          Consider $n = 2,$ and the case $f(r, z) = z^2 - rz = z(z-r)$, i.e., $a_1 = -1, a_0 = 0$.



          The largest root is $r$ (for $r ge 0$), but $0$ for $r < 0$. The function



          $$
          h(r) = begin{cases}
          r & r ge 0 \
          0 & r < 0
          end{cases}
          $$

          is not differentiable at zero, hence not a polynomial.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for your nice answer. May I ask another question: I am looking for the zeros of $L(r) - 1$ and your example shows it is not a polynomial in $t$. But I am still hoping the number of the zeros is bounded. Could you comment on this part? Thanks.
            – user1101010
            Nov 26 at 18:36


















          5














          Consider $n = 2,$ and the case $f(r, z) = z^2 - rz = z(z-r)$, i.e., $a_1 = -1, a_0 = 0$.



          The largest root is $r$ (for $r ge 0$), but $0$ for $r < 0$. The function



          $$
          h(r) = begin{cases}
          r & r ge 0 \
          0 & r < 0
          end{cases}
          $$

          is not differentiable at zero, hence not a polynomial.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for your nice answer. May I ask another question: I am looking for the zeros of $L(r) - 1$ and your example shows it is not a polynomial in $t$. But I am still hoping the number of the zeros is bounded. Could you comment on this part? Thanks.
            – user1101010
            Nov 26 at 18:36
















          5












          5








          5






          Consider $n = 2,$ and the case $f(r, z) = z^2 - rz = z(z-r)$, i.e., $a_1 = -1, a_0 = 0$.



          The largest root is $r$ (for $r ge 0$), but $0$ for $r < 0$. The function



          $$
          h(r) = begin{cases}
          r & r ge 0 \
          0 & r < 0
          end{cases}
          $$

          is not differentiable at zero, hence not a polynomial.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Consider $n = 2,$ and the case $f(r, z) = z^2 - rz = z(z-r)$, i.e., $a_1 = -1, a_0 = 0$.



          The largest root is $r$ (for $r ge 0$), but $0$ for $r < 0$. The function



          $$
          h(r) = begin{cases}
          r & r ge 0 \
          0 & r < 0
          end{cases}
          $$

          is not differentiable at zero, hence not a polynomial.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 26 at 17:54









          John Hughes

          62.3k24090




          62.3k24090












          • Thanks for your nice answer. May I ask another question: I am looking for the zeros of $L(r) - 1$ and your example shows it is not a polynomial in $t$. But I am still hoping the number of the zeros is bounded. Could you comment on this part? Thanks.
            – user1101010
            Nov 26 at 18:36




















          • Thanks for your nice answer. May I ask another question: I am looking for the zeros of $L(r) - 1$ and your example shows it is not a polynomial in $t$. But I am still hoping the number of the zeros is bounded. Could you comment on this part? Thanks.
            – user1101010
            Nov 26 at 18:36


















          Thanks for your nice answer. May I ask another question: I am looking for the zeros of $L(r) - 1$ and your example shows it is not a polynomial in $t$. But I am still hoping the number of the zeros is bounded. Could you comment on this part? Thanks.
          – user1101010
          Nov 26 at 18:36






          Thanks for your nice answer. May I ask another question: I am looking for the zeros of $L(r) - 1$ and your example shows it is not a polynomial in $t$. But I am still hoping the number of the zeros is bounded. Could you comment on this part? Thanks.
          – user1101010
          Nov 26 at 18:36




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014607%2fis-the-largest-root-of-a-parametrized-family-of-polynomials-again-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Index of /

          Tribalistas

          Listed building