Riesz representation and inverse operator.
In class, my professor went through the following construction: Let $Omega$ be a bounded domain and define $X$ to be $H_0^1(Omega)$ or $H^1(Omega)$. We also define $A: X to X^prime$ (where $X^prime$ denotes the dual space of $X$) by the duality pairing
$$
langle Af, grangle = int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g
$$
We will also view $L^2(Omega)$ as a subspace of $X^prime$. Now, there exists $t_0$ such that for all $t>t_0$,
$$
(cdot, cdot) : Xtimes X to mathbb{R}, quad
(f, g) = langle Af, g rangle + tlangle f, grangle_{L^2(Omega)}
$$
defines an inner product on $X$. For each such $t$, it follows from the Riesz representation theorem that $A+tmathrm{I} : Xto X^prime$ is invertible.
I am very confused as to how the Reisz representation theorem applies here and how one can deduce this. Any input is appreciated.
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces
asked Nov 26 at 17:52
Quoka
1,203212
add a comment |
In class, my professor went through the following construction: Let $Omega$ be a bounded domain and define $X$ to be $H_0^1(Omega)$ or $H^1(Omega)$. We also define $A: X to X^prime$ (where $X^prime$ denotes the dual space of $X$) by the duality pairing
$$
langle Af, grangle = int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g
$$
We will also view $L^2(Omega)$ as a subspace of $X^prime$. Now, there exists $t_0$ such that for all $t>t_0$,
$$
(cdot, cdot) : Xtimes X to mathbb{R}, quad
(f, g) = langle Af, g rangle + tlangle f, grangle_{L^2(Omega)}
$$
defines an inner product on $X$. For each such $t$, it follows from the Riesz representation theorem that $A+tmathrm{I} : Xto X^prime$ is invertible.
I am very confused as to how the Reisz representation theorem applies here and how one can deduce this. Any input is appreciated.
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces
asked Nov 26 at 17:52
Quoka
1,203212
Applying the theorem to $A+tI$ you can construct the inverse as it is described in wikipedia
– Javi
Nov 26 at 18:00
I think you mean $(cdot,cdot)$ defines an inner product on $X$, not $V$.
– user10354138
Nov 26 at 18:01
add a comment |
In class, my professor went through the following construction: Let $Omega$ be a bounded domain and define $X$ to be $H_0^1(Omega)$ or $H^1(Omega)$. We also define $A: X to X^prime$ (where $X^prime$ denotes the dual space of $X$) by the duality pairing
$$
langle Af, grangle = int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g
$$
We will also view $L^2(Omega)$ as a subspace of $X^prime$. Now, there exists $t_0$ such that for all $t>t_0$,
$$
(cdot, cdot) : Xtimes X to mathbb{R}, quad
(f, g) = langle Af, g rangle + tlangle f, grangle_{L^2(Omega)}
$$
defines an inner product on $X$. For each such $t$, it follows from the Riesz representation theorem that $A+tmathrm{I} : Xto X^prime$ is invertible.
I am very confused as to how the Reisz representation theorem applies here and how one can deduce this. Any input is appreciated.
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces
asked Nov 26 at 17:52
Quoka
1,203212
In class, my professor went through the following construction: Let $Omega$ be a bounded domain and define $X$ to be $H_0^1(Omega)$ or $H^1(Omega)$. We also define $A: X to X^prime$ (where $X^prime$ denotes the dual space of $X$) by the duality pairing
$$
langle Af, grangle = int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g
$$
We will also view $L^2(Omega)$ as a subspace of $X^prime$. Now, there exists $t_0$ such that for all $t>t_0$,
$$
(cdot, cdot) : Xtimes X to mathbb{R}, quad
(f, g) = langle Af, g rangle + tlangle f, grangle_{L^2(Omega)}
$$
defines an inner product on $X$. For each such $t$, it follows from the Riesz representation theorem that $A+tmathrm{I} : Xto X^prime$ is invertible.
I am very confused as to how the Reisz representation theorem applies here and how one can deduce this. Any input is appreciated.
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces
asked Nov 26 at 17:52
Quoka
1,203212
asked Nov 26 at 17:52
Quoka
1,203212
edited Nov 26 at 18:44
asked Nov 26 at 17:52
Quoka
1,203212
asked Nov 26 at 17:52
Quoka
1,203212
asked Nov 26 at 17:52
Quoka
1,203212
1,203212
Applying the theorem to $A+tI$ you can construct the inverse as it is described in wikipedia
– Javi
Nov 26 at 18:00
I think you mean $(cdot,cdot)$ defines an inner product on $X$, not $V$.
– user10354138
Nov 26 at 18:01
add a comment |
Applying the theorem to $A+tI$ you can construct the inverse as it is described in wikipedia
– Javi
Nov 26 at 18:00
I think you mean $(cdot,cdot)$ defines an inner product on $X$, not $V$.
– user10354138
Nov 26 at 18:01
Applying the theorem to $A+tI$ you can construct the inverse as it is described in wikipedia
– Javi
Nov 26 at 18:00
Applying the theorem to $A+tI$ you can construct the inverse as it is described in wikipedia
– Javi
Nov 26 at 18:00
I think you mean $(cdot,cdot)$ defines an inner product on $X$, not $V$.
– user10354138
Nov 26 at 18:01
I think you mean $(cdot,cdot)$ defines an inner product on $X$, not $V$.
– user10354138
Nov 26 at 18:01
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
For simplicity take $t = 1$. To prove that $A+I$ is invertible you must show it is one-to-one.
The inner product on $H_0^1(Omega)$ is given by $(f,g) = displaystyle int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g , dx$.
The operator $A+I : H_0^1(Omega) to H_0^1(Omega)'$ is defined by
$$langle (A + I)f,g rangle = int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g + fg , dx.$$
The Poincare inequality gives you
$$int_Omega f^2 , dx le C int_Omega |nabla f|^2 , dx$$ for all $f in H_0^1(Omega)$. Consequently for fixed $f$ the functional $Lg = langle (A+I)f,g rangle$ defines a bounded linear functional on $H_0^1(Omega)$. The Riesz representation theorem provides you with a unique function $h in H_0^1(Omega)$ satisfying
$$Lg = (h,g)$$ for all $g in H_0^1(Omega)$. Thus you can regard $A+I$ as a well-defined operator from $H_0^1(Omega)$ to itself, with
$$(A+I)f = h.$$
I think that $A+I$ is clearly linear. To prove that $A+I$ is one-to-one it suffices to show it has a trivial kernel. But if $(A+I)f = 0$ then $langle (A+I)f,g rangle = 0$ for all $g$. In the particular case of $f=g$ you obtain $displaystyle int_Omega |nabla f|^2 + f^2 , dx = 0$, giving you $f=0$.
answered Nov 27 at 0:48
Umberto P.
38.5k13064
Thanks! I mainly got lost with the notation and it helps to see the steps written out :-)
– Quoka
Nov 27 at 0:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014664%2friesz-representation-and-inverse-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
For simplicity take $t = 1$. To prove that $A+I$ is invertible you must show it is one-to-one.
The inner product on $H_0^1(Omega)$ is given by $(f,g) = displaystyle int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g , dx$.
The operator $A+I : H_0^1(Omega) to H_0^1(Omega)'$ is defined by
$$langle (A + I)f,g rangle = int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g + fg , dx.$$
The Poincare inequality gives you
$$int_Omega f^2 , dx le C int_Omega |nabla f|^2 , dx$$ for all $f in H_0^1(Omega)$. Consequently for fixed $f$ the functional $Lg = langle (A+I)f,g rangle$ defines a bounded linear functional on $H_0^1(Omega)$. The Riesz representation theorem provides you with a unique function $h in H_0^1(Omega)$ satisfying
$$Lg = (h,g)$$ for all $g in H_0^1(Omega)$. Thus you can regard $A+I$ as a well-defined operator from $H_0^1(Omega)$ to itself, with
$$(A+I)f = h.$$
I think that $A+I$ is clearly linear. To prove that $A+I$ is one-to-one it suffices to show it has a trivial kernel. But if $(A+I)f = 0$ then $langle (A+I)f,g rangle = 0$ for all $g$. In the particular case of $f=g$ you obtain $displaystyle int_Omega |nabla f|^2 + f^2 , dx = 0$, giving you $f=0$.
answered Nov 27 at 0:48
Umberto P.
38.5k13064
Thanks! I mainly got lost with the notation and it helps to see the steps written out :-)
– Quoka
Nov 27 at 0:51
add a comment |
For simplicity take $t = 1$. To prove that $A+I$ is invertible you must show it is one-to-one.
The inner product on $H_0^1(Omega)$ is given by $(f,g) = displaystyle int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g , dx$.
The operator $A+I : H_0^1(Omega) to H_0^1(Omega)'$ is defined by
$$langle (A + I)f,g rangle = int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g + fg , dx.$$
The Poincare inequality gives you
$$int_Omega f^2 , dx le C int_Omega |nabla f|^2 , dx$$ for all $f in H_0^1(Omega)$. Consequently for fixed $f$ the functional $Lg = langle (A+I)f,g rangle$ defines a bounded linear functional on $H_0^1(Omega)$. The Riesz representation theorem provides you with a unique function $h in H_0^1(Omega)$ satisfying
$$Lg = (h,g)$$ for all $g in H_0^1(Omega)$. Thus you can regard $A+I$ as a well-defined operator from $H_0^1(Omega)$ to itself, with
$$(A+I)f = h.$$
I think that $A+I$ is clearly linear. To prove that $A+I$ is one-to-one it suffices to show it has a trivial kernel. But if $(A+I)f = 0$ then $langle (A+I)f,g rangle = 0$ for all $g$. In the particular case of $f=g$ you obtain $displaystyle int_Omega |nabla f|^2 + f^2 , dx = 0$, giving you $f=0$.
answered Nov 27 at 0:48
Umberto P.
38.5k13064
Thanks! I mainly got lost with the notation and it helps to see the steps written out :-)
– Quoka
Nov 27 at 0:51
add a comment |
For simplicity take $t = 1$. To prove that $A+I$ is invertible you must show it is one-to-one.
The inner product on $H_0^1(Omega)$ is given by $(f,g) = displaystyle int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g , dx$.
The operator $A+I : H_0^1(Omega) to H_0^1(Omega)'$ is defined by
$$langle (A + I)f,g rangle = int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g + fg , dx.$$
The Poincare inequality gives you
$$int_Omega f^2 , dx le C int_Omega |nabla f|^2 , dx$$ for all $f in H_0^1(Omega)$. Consequently for fixed $f$ the functional $Lg = langle (A+I)f,g rangle$ defines a bounded linear functional on $H_0^1(Omega)$. The Riesz representation theorem provides you with a unique function $h in H_0^1(Omega)$ satisfying
$$Lg = (h,g)$$ for all $g in H_0^1(Omega)$. Thus you can regard $A+I$ as a well-defined operator from $H_0^1(Omega)$ to itself, with
$$(A+I)f = h.$$
I think that $A+I$ is clearly linear. To prove that $A+I$ is one-to-one it suffices to show it has a trivial kernel. But if $(A+I)f = 0$ then $langle (A+I)f,g rangle = 0$ for all $g$. In the particular case of $f=g$ you obtain $displaystyle int_Omega |nabla f|^2 + f^2 , dx = 0$, giving you $f=0$.
answered Nov 27 at 0:48
Umberto P.
38.5k13064
For simplicity take $t = 1$. To prove that $A+I$ is invertible you must show it is one-to-one.
The inner product on $H_0^1(Omega)$ is given by $(f,g) = displaystyle int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g , dx$.
The operator $A+I : H_0^1(Omega) to H_0^1(Omega)'$ is defined by
$$langle (A + I)f,g rangle = int_Omega nabla f cdot nabla g + fg , dx.$$
The Poincare inequality gives you
$$int_Omega f^2 , dx le C int_Omega |nabla f|^2 , dx$$ for all $f in H_0^1(Omega)$. Consequently for fixed $f$ the functional $Lg = langle (A+I)f,g rangle$ defines a bounded linear functional on $H_0^1(Omega)$. The Riesz representation theorem provides you with a unique function $h in H_0^1(Omega)$ satisfying
$$Lg = (h,g)$$ for all $g in H_0^1(Omega)$. Thus you can regard $A+I$ as a well-defined operator from $H_0^1(Omega)$ to itself, with
$$(A+I)f = h.$$
I think that $A+I$ is clearly linear. To prove that $A+I$ is one-to-one it suffices to show it has a trivial kernel. But if $(A+I)f = 0$ then $langle (A+I)f,g rangle = 0$ for all $g$. In the particular case of $f=g$ you obtain $displaystyle int_Omega |nabla f|^2 + f^2 , dx = 0$, giving you $f=0$.
answered Nov 27 at 0:48
Umberto P.
38.5k13064
answered Nov 27 at 0:48
Umberto P.
38.5k13064
answered Nov 27 at 0:48
Umberto P.
38.5k13064
answered Nov 27 at 0:48
Umberto P.
38.5k13064
38.5k13064
Thanks! I mainly got lost with the notation and it helps to see the steps written out :-)
– Quoka
Nov 27 at 0:51
add a comment |
Thanks! I mainly got lost with the notation and it helps to see the steps written out :-)
– Quoka
Nov 27 at 0:51
Thanks! I mainly got lost with the notation and it helps to see the steps written out :-)
– Quoka
Nov 27 at 0:51
Thanks! I mainly got lost with the notation and it helps to see the steps written out :-)
– Quoka
Nov 27 at 0:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014664%2friesz-representation-and-inverse-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Applying the theorem to $A+tI$ you can construct the inverse as it is described in wikipedia
– Javi
Nov 26 at 18:00
I think you mean $(cdot,cdot)$ defines an inner product on $X$, not $V$.
– user10354138
Nov 26 at 18:01