Is the Curiosity rover equipped with motion detectors?
On Earth, wild life cameras are sometimes equipped with motion detectors to record rare species automatically.
Could they not be applied in the case of Mars too ?
Is Curiosity not equipped with motion detectors to be able to record moving objects like boulders or dust devils automatically ?
Even shadows and meteorites ?
And if not, would that not be a good idea for the Mars 2020 mission ?
mars curiosity camera
asked Dec 10 at 14:11
Conelisinspace
6671637
add a comment |
On Earth, wild life cameras are sometimes equipped with motion detectors to record rare species automatically.
Could they not be applied in the case of Mars too ?
Is Curiosity not equipped with motion detectors to be able to record moving objects like boulders or dust devils automatically ?
Even shadows and meteorites ?
And if not, would that not be a good idea for the Mars 2020 mission ?
mars curiosity camera
asked Dec 10 at 14:11
Conelisinspace
6671637
4
Sure, it could, but why? What might be the scientific benefit of such a sensor? Remember: every ounce of a payload is precious and anything that doesn’t bring significant benefit is a waste.
– Paul
Dec 10 at 14:40
@Paul With such sensors it could record (unexpected) events or objects like meteorites, falling rock, dust devils and maybe things we would never expect beforehand.
– Conelisinspace
Dec 10 at 15:06
1
If the Opportunity rover had motion detectors we might know a bit more about how this rock appeared "from nowhere" 12 days after a picture was taken of the same area.
– Fred
Dec 11 at 16:29
@Fred "Mysterious doughnut" ! NASA thinks it may have been flipped upside down when a wheel dislodged it. Good to know it has high concentrations of sulfur and magnesium !
– Conelisinspace
Dec 11 at 18:41
add a comment |
On Earth, wild life cameras are sometimes equipped with motion detectors to record rare species automatically.
Could they not be applied in the case of Mars too ?
Is Curiosity not equipped with motion detectors to be able to record moving objects like boulders or dust devils automatically ?
Even shadows and meteorites ?
And if not, would that not be a good idea for the Mars 2020 mission ?
mars curiosity camera
asked Dec 10 at 14:11
Conelisinspace
6671637
On Earth, wild life cameras are sometimes equipped with motion detectors to record rare species automatically.
Could they not be applied in the case of Mars too ?
Is Curiosity not equipped with motion detectors to be able to record moving objects like boulders or dust devils automatically ?
Even shadows and meteorites ?
And if not, would that not be a good idea for the Mars 2020 mission ?
mars curiosity camera
mars curiosity camera
asked Dec 10 at 14:11
Conelisinspace
6671637
asked Dec 10 at 14:11
Conelisinspace
6671637
edited Dec 12 at 9:31
asked Dec 10 at 14:11
Conelisinspace
6671637
asked Dec 10 at 14:11
Conelisinspace
6671637
asked Dec 10 at 14:11
Conelisinspace
6671637
6671637
4
Sure, it could, but why? What might be the scientific benefit of such a sensor? Remember: every ounce of a payload is precious and anything that doesn’t bring significant benefit is a waste.
– Paul
Dec 10 at 14:40
@Paul With such sensors it could record (unexpected) events or objects like meteorites, falling rock, dust devils and maybe things we would never expect beforehand.
– Conelisinspace
Dec 10 at 15:06
1
If the Opportunity rover had motion detectors we might know a bit more about how this rock appeared "from nowhere" 12 days after a picture was taken of the same area.
– Fred
Dec 11 at 16:29
@Fred "Mysterious doughnut" ! NASA thinks it may have been flipped upside down when a wheel dislodged it. Good to know it has high concentrations of sulfur and magnesium !
– Conelisinspace
Dec 11 at 18:41
add a comment |
4
Sure, it could, but why? What might be the scientific benefit of such a sensor? Remember: every ounce of a payload is precious and anything that doesn’t bring significant benefit is a waste.
– Paul
Dec 10 at 14:40
@Paul With such sensors it could record (unexpected) events or objects like meteorites, falling rock, dust devils and maybe things we would never expect beforehand.
– Conelisinspace
Dec 10 at 15:06
1
If the Opportunity rover had motion detectors we might know a bit more about how this rock appeared "from nowhere" 12 days after a picture was taken of the same area.
– Fred
Dec 11 at 16:29
@Fred "Mysterious doughnut" ! NASA thinks it may have been flipped upside down when a wheel dislodged it. Good to know it has high concentrations of sulfur and magnesium !
– Conelisinspace
Dec 11 at 18:41
4
4
Sure, it could, but why? What might be the scientific benefit of such a sensor? Remember: every ounce of a payload is precious and anything that doesn’t bring significant benefit is a waste.
– Paul
Dec 10 at 14:40
Sure, it could, but why? What might be the scientific benefit of such a sensor? Remember: every ounce of a payload is precious and anything that doesn’t bring significant benefit is a waste.
– Paul
Dec 10 at 14:40
@Paul With such sensors it could record (unexpected) events or objects like meteorites, falling rock, dust devils and maybe things we would never expect beforehand.
– Conelisinspace
Dec 10 at 15:06
@Paul With such sensors it could record (unexpected) events or objects like meteorites, falling rock, dust devils and maybe things we would never expect beforehand.
– Conelisinspace
Dec 10 at 15:06
1
1
If the Opportunity rover had motion detectors we might know a bit more about how this rock appeared "from nowhere" 12 days after a picture was taken of the same area.
– Fred
Dec 11 at 16:29
If the Opportunity rover had motion detectors we might know a bit more about how this rock appeared "from nowhere" 12 days after a picture was taken of the same area.
– Fred
Dec 11 at 16:29
@Fred "Mysterious doughnut" ! NASA thinks it may have been flipped upside down when a wheel dislodged it. Good to know it has high concentrations of sulfur and magnesium !
– Conelisinspace
Dec 11 at 18:41
@Fred "Mysterious doughnut" ! NASA thinks it may have been flipped upside down when a wheel dislodged it. Good to know it has high concentrations of sulfur and magnesium !
– Conelisinspace
Dec 11 at 18:41
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Most conventional motion detectors wouldn't work well on Mars.
PIR: Usually only works well with warm bodies such as humans and animals. Would probably never trigger on Mars
Ultrasonic: Due to the extremely low pressure on Mars any acoustic sensing through the atmosphere would be greatly hindered. These sensors usually only pick up on very large, perpendicularly reflective objects. Such a sensor also has a very short range and would also never trigger on Mars (unless the rovers arm swings past the sensor)
A radio-based motion detector would work in principle but there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities).
This however leaves us with one sensor on the list, "video camera software". The Curiosity rover currently has 17 cameras and it takes lots of pictures that can be compared with each other to detect motion. For example, here is a "video" from Curiosity recording a dust devil moving across the surface:
Summary: Motion detection is a software feature which doesn't require special hardware to work, it just needs the already existing cameras.
edited Dec 11 at 19:39
Community♦
1
answered Dec 10 at 15:38
Dragongeek
3,8271331
3
very nice answer! "...there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales..." check Tall boulder rolls down martian hill, lands upright and also How to use this Google Mars viewer to find this Martian landslide event? but yes, these are pretty rare ;-)
– uhoh
Dec 10 at 15:43
4
"nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass." -- that we know of :)
– Barmar
Dec 10 at 19:37
1
Well, the whole point of such a scientific instrument would be to confirm or deny your assumption that "Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities)". But I do of course agree that such a mission would be neither economical nor particularly useful in all likelihood.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 11 at 10:54
2
Done by software on board. That's how they catch the dust devils. Otherwise it would just be incredible luck. This software was first deployed on the Mars Exploration Rovers in 2007. Also used to catch clouds.
– Mark Adler
Dec 12 at 5:41
1
InSight adds "seismic detector" to the mix. Once it's deployed, the seismometer will detect anything with any serious mass that does move (like a landslide, a Martian walking past or a meteorite impact ).
– Steve Linton
Dec 12 at 11:19
|
show 10 more comments
So, the other answer establishes the least-disruptive motion sensor is using motion analysis software on the camera feeds.
Doing the processing on the ground is easy enough, but we don't receive enough images for this. Curiosity does not repeatedly image the same scene. If you want to do that, the amount of transmitted data goes up, and in another question we've seen there's not much room to do that.
So the question becomes, can this be done in a rover's onboard systems?
Apart from processing power, there is an electrical power issue. The rover's systems draw more power than the RTG supplies, so the rover has to hibernate much of the time to recharge its batteries. This limits motion detection to the times the rover is active anyway, and that time is spent traveling or operating the instruments. It may be possible to take some extra pictures during instrument operations and run a comparison on them.
answered Dec 12 at 11:14
Hobbes
85.2k2238385
With a CCD electrical charges are converted into digital values in memory. This CCD could be in an active state all day (and night?) Could not software be designed to registrate an image in memory only if one or a few pixels from the CCD differ from the last stored image ? That could save a lot of memory and power ?
– Conelisinspace
Dec 12 at 11:35
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32737%2fis-the-curiosity-rover-equipped-with-motion-detectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Most conventional motion detectors wouldn't work well on Mars.
PIR: Usually only works well with warm bodies such as humans and animals. Would probably never trigger on Mars
Ultrasonic: Due to the extremely low pressure on Mars any acoustic sensing through the atmosphere would be greatly hindered. These sensors usually only pick up on very large, perpendicularly reflective objects. Such a sensor also has a very short range and would also never trigger on Mars (unless the rovers arm swings past the sensor)
A radio-based motion detector would work in principle but there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities).
This however leaves us with one sensor on the list, "video camera software". The Curiosity rover currently has 17 cameras and it takes lots of pictures that can be compared with each other to detect motion. For example, here is a "video" from Curiosity recording a dust devil moving across the surface:
Summary: Motion detection is a software feature which doesn't require special hardware to work, it just needs the already existing cameras.
edited Dec 11 at 19:39
Community♦
1
answered Dec 10 at 15:38
Dragongeek
3,8271331
3
very nice answer! "...there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales..." check Tall boulder rolls down martian hill, lands upright and also How to use this Google Mars viewer to find this Martian landslide event? but yes, these are pretty rare ;-)
– uhoh
Dec 10 at 15:43
4
"nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass." -- that we know of :)
– Barmar
Dec 10 at 19:37
1
Well, the whole point of such a scientific instrument would be to confirm or deny your assumption that "Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities)". But I do of course agree that such a mission would be neither economical nor particularly useful in all likelihood.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 11 at 10:54
2
Done by software on board. That's how they catch the dust devils. Otherwise it would just be incredible luck. This software was first deployed on the Mars Exploration Rovers in 2007. Also used to catch clouds.
– Mark Adler
Dec 12 at 5:41
1
InSight adds "seismic detector" to the mix. Once it's deployed, the seismometer will detect anything with any serious mass that does move (like a landslide, a Martian walking past or a meteorite impact ).
– Steve Linton
Dec 12 at 11:19
|
show 10 more comments
Most conventional motion detectors wouldn't work well on Mars.
PIR: Usually only works well with warm bodies such as humans and animals. Would probably never trigger on Mars
Ultrasonic: Due to the extremely low pressure on Mars any acoustic sensing through the atmosphere would be greatly hindered. These sensors usually only pick up on very large, perpendicularly reflective objects. Such a sensor also has a very short range and would also never trigger on Mars (unless the rovers arm swings past the sensor)
A radio-based motion detector would work in principle but there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities).
This however leaves us with one sensor on the list, "video camera software". The Curiosity rover currently has 17 cameras and it takes lots of pictures that can be compared with each other to detect motion. For example, here is a "video" from Curiosity recording a dust devil moving across the surface:
Summary: Motion detection is a software feature which doesn't require special hardware to work, it just needs the already existing cameras.
edited Dec 11 at 19:39
Community♦
1
answered Dec 10 at 15:38
Dragongeek
3,8271331
3
very nice answer! "...there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales..." check Tall boulder rolls down martian hill, lands upright and also How to use this Google Mars viewer to find this Martian landslide event? but yes, these are pretty rare ;-)
– uhoh
Dec 10 at 15:43
4
"nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass." -- that we know of :)
– Barmar
Dec 10 at 19:37
1
Well, the whole point of such a scientific instrument would be to confirm or deny your assumption that "Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities)". But I do of course agree that such a mission would be neither economical nor particularly useful in all likelihood.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 11 at 10:54
2
Done by software on board. That's how they catch the dust devils. Otherwise it would just be incredible luck. This software was first deployed on the Mars Exploration Rovers in 2007. Also used to catch clouds.
– Mark Adler
Dec 12 at 5:41
1
InSight adds "seismic detector" to the mix. Once it's deployed, the seismometer will detect anything with any serious mass that does move (like a landslide, a Martian walking past or a meteorite impact ).
– Steve Linton
Dec 12 at 11:19
|
show 10 more comments
Most conventional motion detectors wouldn't work well on Mars.
PIR: Usually only works well with warm bodies such as humans and animals. Would probably never trigger on Mars
Ultrasonic: Due to the extremely low pressure on Mars any acoustic sensing through the atmosphere would be greatly hindered. These sensors usually only pick up on very large, perpendicularly reflective objects. Such a sensor also has a very short range and would also never trigger on Mars (unless the rovers arm swings past the sensor)
A radio-based motion detector would work in principle but there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities).
This however leaves us with one sensor on the list, "video camera software". The Curiosity rover currently has 17 cameras and it takes lots of pictures that can be compared with each other to detect motion. For example, here is a "video" from Curiosity recording a dust devil moving across the surface:
Summary: Motion detection is a software feature which doesn't require special hardware to work, it just needs the already existing cameras.
edited Dec 11 at 19:39
Community♦
1
answered Dec 10 at 15:38
Dragongeek
3,8271331
Most conventional motion detectors wouldn't work well on Mars.
PIR: Usually only works well with warm bodies such as humans and animals. Would probably never trigger on Mars
Ultrasonic: Due to the extremely low pressure on Mars any acoustic sensing through the atmosphere would be greatly hindered. These sensors usually only pick up on very large, perpendicularly reflective objects. Such a sensor also has a very short range and would also never trigger on Mars (unless the rovers arm swings past the sensor)
A radio-based motion detector would work in principle but there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities).
This however leaves us with one sensor on the list, "video camera software". The Curiosity rover currently has 17 cameras and it takes lots of pictures that can be compared with each other to detect motion. For example, here is a "video" from Curiosity recording a dust devil moving across the surface:
Summary: Motion detection is a software feature which doesn't require special hardware to work, it just needs the already existing cameras.
edited Dec 11 at 19:39
Community♦
1
answered Dec 10 at 15:38
Dragongeek
3,8271331
edited Dec 11 at 19:39
Community♦
1
edited Dec 11 at 19:39
Community♦
1
edited Dec 11 at 19:39
Community♦
1
1
answered Dec 10 at 15:38
Dragongeek
3,8271331
answered Dec 10 at 15:38
Dragongeek
3,8271331
answered Dec 10 at 15:38
Dragongeek
3,8271331
3,8271331
3
very nice answer! "...there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales..." check Tall boulder rolls down martian hill, lands upright and also How to use this Google Mars viewer to find this Martian landslide event? but yes, these are pretty rare ;-)
– uhoh
Dec 10 at 15:43
4
"nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass." -- that we know of :)
– Barmar
Dec 10 at 19:37
1
Well, the whole point of such a scientific instrument would be to confirm or deny your assumption that "Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities)". But I do of course agree that such a mission would be neither economical nor particularly useful in all likelihood.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 11 at 10:54
2
Done by software on board. That's how they catch the dust devils. Otherwise it would just be incredible luck. This software was first deployed on the Mars Exploration Rovers in 2007. Also used to catch clouds.
– Mark Adler
Dec 12 at 5:41
1
InSight adds "seismic detector" to the mix. Once it's deployed, the seismometer will detect anything with any serious mass that does move (like a landslide, a Martian walking past or a meteorite impact ).
– Steve Linton
Dec 12 at 11:19
|
show 10 more comments
3
very nice answer! "...there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales..." check Tall boulder rolls down martian hill, lands upright and also How to use this Google Mars viewer to find this Martian landslide event? but yes, these are pretty rare ;-)
– uhoh
Dec 10 at 15:43
4
"nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass." -- that we know of :)
– Barmar
Dec 10 at 19:37
1
Well, the whole point of such a scientific instrument would be to confirm or deny your assumption that "Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities)". But I do of course agree that such a mission would be neither economical nor particularly useful in all likelihood.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 11 at 10:54
2
Done by software on board. That's how they catch the dust devils. Otherwise it would just be incredible luck. This software was first deployed on the Mars Exploration Rovers in 2007. Also used to catch clouds.
– Mark Adler
Dec 12 at 5:41
1
InSight adds "seismic detector" to the mix. Once it's deployed, the seismometer will detect anything with any serious mass that does move (like a landslide, a Martian walking past or a meteorite impact ).
– Steve Linton
Dec 12 at 11:19
3
3
very nice answer! "...there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales..." check Tall boulder rolls down martian hill, lands upright and also How to use this Google Mars viewer to find this Martian landslide event? but yes, these are pretty rare ;-)
– uhoh
Dec 10 at 15:43
very nice answer! "...there's basically nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass. Rocks only really move on geological timescales..." check Tall boulder rolls down martian hill, lands upright and also How to use this Google Mars viewer to find this Martian landslide event? but yes, these are pretty rare ;-)
– uhoh
Dec 10 at 15:43
4
4
"nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass." -- that we know of :)
– Barmar
Dec 10 at 19:37
"nothing that moves on Mars with any real mass." -- that we know of :)
– Barmar
Dec 10 at 19:37
1
1
Well, the whole point of such a scientific instrument would be to confirm or deny your assumption that "Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities)". But I do of course agree that such a mission would be neither economical nor particularly useful in all likelihood.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 11 at 10:54
Well, the whole point of such a scientific instrument would be to confirm or deny your assumption that "Rocks only really move on geological timescales and the only thing that would ever move on the surface near the rover is a dust devil or other wind activity (the rover would want to be far away from regions where landslides are possibilities)". But I do of course agree that such a mission would be neither economical nor particularly useful in all likelihood.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 11 at 10:54
2
2
Done by software on board. That's how they catch the dust devils. Otherwise it would just be incredible luck. This software was first deployed on the Mars Exploration Rovers in 2007. Also used to catch clouds.
– Mark Adler
Dec 12 at 5:41
Done by software on board. That's how they catch the dust devils. Otherwise it would just be incredible luck. This software was first deployed on the Mars Exploration Rovers in 2007. Also used to catch clouds.
– Mark Adler
Dec 12 at 5:41
1
1
InSight adds "seismic detector" to the mix. Once it's deployed, the seismometer will detect anything with any serious mass that does move (like a landslide, a Martian walking past or a meteorite impact ).
– Steve Linton
Dec 12 at 11:19
InSight adds "seismic detector" to the mix. Once it's deployed, the seismometer will detect anything with any serious mass that does move (like a landslide, a Martian walking past or a meteorite impact ).
– Steve Linton
Dec 12 at 11:19
|
show 10 more comments
So, the other answer establishes the least-disruptive motion sensor is using motion analysis software on the camera feeds.
Doing the processing on the ground is easy enough, but we don't receive enough images for this. Curiosity does not repeatedly image the same scene. If you want to do that, the amount of transmitted data goes up, and in another question we've seen there's not much room to do that.
So the question becomes, can this be done in a rover's onboard systems?
Apart from processing power, there is an electrical power issue. The rover's systems draw more power than the RTG supplies, so the rover has to hibernate much of the time to recharge its batteries. This limits motion detection to the times the rover is active anyway, and that time is spent traveling or operating the instruments. It may be possible to take some extra pictures during instrument operations and run a comparison on them.
answered Dec 12 at 11:14
Hobbes
85.2k2238385
With a CCD electrical charges are converted into digital values in memory. This CCD could be in an active state all day (and night?) Could not software be designed to registrate an image in memory only if one or a few pixels from the CCD differ from the last stored image ? That could save a lot of memory and power ?
– Conelisinspace
Dec 12 at 11:35
add a comment |
So, the other answer establishes the least-disruptive motion sensor is using motion analysis software on the camera feeds.
Doing the processing on the ground is easy enough, but we don't receive enough images for this. Curiosity does not repeatedly image the same scene. If you want to do that, the amount of transmitted data goes up, and in another question we've seen there's not much room to do that.
So the question becomes, can this be done in a rover's onboard systems?
Apart from processing power, there is an electrical power issue. The rover's systems draw more power than the RTG supplies, so the rover has to hibernate much of the time to recharge its batteries. This limits motion detection to the times the rover is active anyway, and that time is spent traveling or operating the instruments. It may be possible to take some extra pictures during instrument operations and run a comparison on them.
answered Dec 12 at 11:14
Hobbes
85.2k2238385
With a CCD electrical charges are converted into digital values in memory. This CCD could be in an active state all day (and night?) Could not software be designed to registrate an image in memory only if one or a few pixels from the CCD differ from the last stored image ? That could save a lot of memory and power ?
– Conelisinspace
Dec 12 at 11:35
add a comment |
So, the other answer establishes the least-disruptive motion sensor is using motion analysis software on the camera feeds.
Doing the processing on the ground is easy enough, but we don't receive enough images for this. Curiosity does not repeatedly image the same scene. If you want to do that, the amount of transmitted data goes up, and in another question we've seen there's not much room to do that.
So the question becomes, can this be done in a rover's onboard systems?
Apart from processing power, there is an electrical power issue. The rover's systems draw more power than the RTG supplies, so the rover has to hibernate much of the time to recharge its batteries. This limits motion detection to the times the rover is active anyway, and that time is spent traveling or operating the instruments. It may be possible to take some extra pictures during instrument operations and run a comparison on them.
answered Dec 12 at 11:14
Hobbes
85.2k2238385
So, the other answer establishes the least-disruptive motion sensor is using motion analysis software on the camera feeds.
Doing the processing on the ground is easy enough, but we don't receive enough images for this. Curiosity does not repeatedly image the same scene. If you want to do that, the amount of transmitted data goes up, and in another question we've seen there's not much room to do that.
So the question becomes, can this be done in a rover's onboard systems?
Apart from processing power, there is an electrical power issue. The rover's systems draw more power than the RTG supplies, so the rover has to hibernate much of the time to recharge its batteries. This limits motion detection to the times the rover is active anyway, and that time is spent traveling or operating the instruments. It may be possible to take some extra pictures during instrument operations and run a comparison on them.
answered Dec 12 at 11:14
Hobbes
85.2k2238385
answered Dec 12 at 11:14
Hobbes
85.2k2238385
answered Dec 12 at 11:14
Hobbes
85.2k2238385
answered Dec 12 at 11:14
Hobbes
85.2k2238385
85.2k2238385
With a CCD electrical charges are converted into digital values in memory. This CCD could be in an active state all day (and night?) Could not software be designed to registrate an image in memory only if one or a few pixels from the CCD differ from the last stored image ? That could save a lot of memory and power ?
– Conelisinspace
Dec 12 at 11:35
add a comment |
With a CCD electrical charges are converted into digital values in memory. This CCD could be in an active state all day (and night?) Could not software be designed to registrate an image in memory only if one or a few pixels from the CCD differ from the last stored image ? That could save a lot of memory and power ?
– Conelisinspace
Dec 12 at 11:35
With a CCD electrical charges are converted into digital values in memory. This CCD could be in an active state all day (and night?) Could not software be designed to registrate an image in memory only if one or a few pixels from the CCD differ from the last stored image ? That could save a lot of memory and power ?
– Conelisinspace
Dec 12 at 11:35
With a CCD electrical charges are converted into digital values in memory. This CCD could be in an active state all day (and night?) Could not software be designed to registrate an image in memory only if one or a few pixels from the CCD differ from the last stored image ? That could save a lot of memory and power ?
– Conelisinspace
Dec 12 at 11:35
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32737%2fis-the-curiosity-rover-equipped-with-motion-detectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
Sure, it could, but why? What might be the scientific benefit of such a sensor? Remember: every ounce of a payload is precious and anything that doesn’t bring significant benefit is a waste.
– Paul
Dec 10 at 14:40
@Paul With such sensors it could record (unexpected) events or objects like meteorites, falling rock, dust devils and maybe things we would never expect beforehand.
– Conelisinspace
Dec 10 at 15:06
1
If the Opportunity rover had motion detectors we might know a bit more about how this rock appeared "from nowhere" 12 days after a picture was taken of the same area.
– Fred
Dec 11 at 16:29
@Fred "Mysterious doughnut" ! NASA thinks it may have been flipped upside down when a wheel dislodged it. Good to know it has high concentrations of sulfur and magnesium !
– Conelisinspace
Dec 11 at 18:41