Hyperbolic Geometry: Representation of the metric in a chart












1














Let $mathbb{R}^{1,n}$ denote Lorentzian $n$-space, i.e., $mathbb{R}^n$ equipped with the Lorentzian inner product $$langle x,y rangle = - x_0 y_0 + x_1 y_1 + cdots + x_n y_n.$$



Define $mathbb{H}^n : = left { xi in mathbb{R}^{1,n} : langle xi, xi rangle = -1, xi_0 > 0 right }$ to be hyperbolic $n$-space. I have been battling with the following seemingly standard/trivial exercises in Jöst's Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis and have had little success:



5) Show that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ induces a Riemannian metric on the tangent spaces $T_p mathbb{H}^n subset T_p mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ for $p in mathbb{H}^n$.



6) Let $s = (-1, 0, ..., 0) in mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, and define $$f(x) = s - frac{2(x-s)}{langle x-s, x-s rangle}.$$ Show that $f : mathbb{H}^n longrightarrow { xi in mathbb{R}^n : | xi | < 1 }$ is a diffeomorphism, and that in this chart, the metric assumes the form $$frac{4}{(1 - | xi |^2)^2} dxi_i otimes dxi_i.$$



Thoughts/Progress:



The fact that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ defines an inner product is clear, but I cannot convince myself that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ is positive definite. For Q6., I am aware that a similar question has been posted on here, but the solution is not clear to me.



Note that I do not want answers to these problems, just guidance.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • For $5)$ I have a trick so I don't know how to give a hint about this solution.
    – Dante Grevino
    Nov 25 at 1:29






  • 1




    Are you familiar with differential forms and their use in differential geometry? If so, I can give some hints.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 25 at 2:41










  • @TedShifrin I am familiar with differential forms. I am just new to the hyperbolic material.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 20:21










  • Actually, I take it back. The check that the induced metric on the orthogonal complement of $xi$ is positive-definite is just basic linear algebra. If you want to see an easy moving-frames computation that this space has constant curvature $-1$, I'll show you that ... :)
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 25 at 22:34






  • 1




    Sure thing. If my answer here makes sense to you, I'll show you how things get modified in the $O(n,1)$ case. Just post a separate question.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 26 at 0:13


















1














Let $mathbb{R}^{1,n}$ denote Lorentzian $n$-space, i.e., $mathbb{R}^n$ equipped with the Lorentzian inner product $$langle x,y rangle = - x_0 y_0 + x_1 y_1 + cdots + x_n y_n.$$



Define $mathbb{H}^n : = left { xi in mathbb{R}^{1,n} : langle xi, xi rangle = -1, xi_0 > 0 right }$ to be hyperbolic $n$-space. I have been battling with the following seemingly standard/trivial exercises in Jöst's Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis and have had little success:



5) Show that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ induces a Riemannian metric on the tangent spaces $T_p mathbb{H}^n subset T_p mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ for $p in mathbb{H}^n$.



6) Let $s = (-1, 0, ..., 0) in mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, and define $$f(x) = s - frac{2(x-s)}{langle x-s, x-s rangle}.$$ Show that $f : mathbb{H}^n longrightarrow { xi in mathbb{R}^n : | xi | < 1 }$ is a diffeomorphism, and that in this chart, the metric assumes the form $$frac{4}{(1 - | xi |^2)^2} dxi_i otimes dxi_i.$$



Thoughts/Progress:



The fact that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ defines an inner product is clear, but I cannot convince myself that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ is positive definite. For Q6., I am aware that a similar question has been posted on here, but the solution is not clear to me.



Note that I do not want answers to these problems, just guidance.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • For $5)$ I have a trick so I don't know how to give a hint about this solution.
    – Dante Grevino
    Nov 25 at 1:29






  • 1




    Are you familiar with differential forms and their use in differential geometry? If so, I can give some hints.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 25 at 2:41










  • @TedShifrin I am familiar with differential forms. I am just new to the hyperbolic material.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 20:21










  • Actually, I take it back. The check that the induced metric on the orthogonal complement of $xi$ is positive-definite is just basic linear algebra. If you want to see an easy moving-frames computation that this space has constant curvature $-1$, I'll show you that ... :)
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 25 at 22:34






  • 1




    Sure thing. If my answer here makes sense to you, I'll show you how things get modified in the $O(n,1)$ case. Just post a separate question.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 26 at 0:13
















1












1








1







Let $mathbb{R}^{1,n}$ denote Lorentzian $n$-space, i.e., $mathbb{R}^n$ equipped with the Lorentzian inner product $$langle x,y rangle = - x_0 y_0 + x_1 y_1 + cdots + x_n y_n.$$



Define $mathbb{H}^n : = left { xi in mathbb{R}^{1,n} : langle xi, xi rangle = -1, xi_0 > 0 right }$ to be hyperbolic $n$-space. I have been battling with the following seemingly standard/trivial exercises in Jöst's Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis and have had little success:



5) Show that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ induces a Riemannian metric on the tangent spaces $T_p mathbb{H}^n subset T_p mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ for $p in mathbb{H}^n$.



6) Let $s = (-1, 0, ..., 0) in mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, and define $$f(x) = s - frac{2(x-s)}{langle x-s, x-s rangle}.$$ Show that $f : mathbb{H}^n longrightarrow { xi in mathbb{R}^n : | xi | < 1 }$ is a diffeomorphism, and that in this chart, the metric assumes the form $$frac{4}{(1 - | xi |^2)^2} dxi_i otimes dxi_i.$$



Thoughts/Progress:



The fact that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ defines an inner product is clear, but I cannot convince myself that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ is positive definite. For Q6., I am aware that a similar question has been posted on here, but the solution is not clear to me.



Note that I do not want answers to these problems, just guidance.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question













Let $mathbb{R}^{1,n}$ denote Lorentzian $n$-space, i.e., $mathbb{R}^n$ equipped with the Lorentzian inner product $$langle x,y rangle = - x_0 y_0 + x_1 y_1 + cdots + x_n y_n.$$



Define $mathbb{H}^n : = left { xi in mathbb{R}^{1,n} : langle xi, xi rangle = -1, xi_0 > 0 right }$ to be hyperbolic $n$-space. I have been battling with the following seemingly standard/trivial exercises in Jöst's Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis and have had little success:



5) Show that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ induces a Riemannian metric on the tangent spaces $T_p mathbb{H}^n subset T_p mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ for $p in mathbb{H}^n$.



6) Let $s = (-1, 0, ..., 0) in mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, and define $$f(x) = s - frac{2(x-s)}{langle x-s, x-s rangle}.$$ Show that $f : mathbb{H}^n longrightarrow { xi in mathbb{R}^n : | xi | < 1 }$ is a diffeomorphism, and that in this chart, the metric assumes the form $$frac{4}{(1 - | xi |^2)^2} dxi_i otimes dxi_i.$$



Thoughts/Progress:



The fact that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ defines an inner product is clear, but I cannot convince myself that $langle cdot, cdot rangle$ is positive definite. For Q6., I am aware that a similar question has been posted on here, but the solution is not clear to me.



Note that I do not want answers to these problems, just guidance.



Thanks in advance.







differential-geometry riemannian-geometry hyperbolic-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 24 at 21:49









AmorFati

391529




391529












  • For $5)$ I have a trick so I don't know how to give a hint about this solution.
    – Dante Grevino
    Nov 25 at 1:29






  • 1




    Are you familiar with differential forms and their use in differential geometry? If so, I can give some hints.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 25 at 2:41










  • @TedShifrin I am familiar with differential forms. I am just new to the hyperbolic material.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 20:21










  • Actually, I take it back. The check that the induced metric on the orthogonal complement of $xi$ is positive-definite is just basic linear algebra. If you want to see an easy moving-frames computation that this space has constant curvature $-1$, I'll show you that ... :)
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 25 at 22:34






  • 1




    Sure thing. If my answer here makes sense to you, I'll show you how things get modified in the $O(n,1)$ case. Just post a separate question.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 26 at 0:13




















  • For $5)$ I have a trick so I don't know how to give a hint about this solution.
    – Dante Grevino
    Nov 25 at 1:29






  • 1




    Are you familiar with differential forms and their use in differential geometry? If so, I can give some hints.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 25 at 2:41










  • @TedShifrin I am familiar with differential forms. I am just new to the hyperbolic material.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 20:21










  • Actually, I take it back. The check that the induced metric on the orthogonal complement of $xi$ is positive-definite is just basic linear algebra. If you want to see an easy moving-frames computation that this space has constant curvature $-1$, I'll show you that ... :)
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 25 at 22:34






  • 1




    Sure thing. If my answer here makes sense to you, I'll show you how things get modified in the $O(n,1)$ case. Just post a separate question.
    – Ted Shifrin
    Nov 26 at 0:13


















For $5)$ I have a trick so I don't know how to give a hint about this solution.
– Dante Grevino
Nov 25 at 1:29




For $5)$ I have a trick so I don't know how to give a hint about this solution.
– Dante Grevino
Nov 25 at 1:29




1




1




Are you familiar with differential forms and their use in differential geometry? If so, I can give some hints.
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 25 at 2:41




Are you familiar with differential forms and their use in differential geometry? If so, I can give some hints.
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 25 at 2:41












@TedShifrin I am familiar with differential forms. I am just new to the hyperbolic material.
– AmorFati
Nov 25 at 20:21




@TedShifrin I am familiar with differential forms. I am just new to the hyperbolic material.
– AmorFati
Nov 25 at 20:21












Actually, I take it back. The check that the induced metric on the orthogonal complement of $xi$ is positive-definite is just basic linear algebra. If you want to see an easy moving-frames computation that this space has constant curvature $-1$, I'll show you that ... :)
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 25 at 22:34




Actually, I take it back. The check that the induced metric on the orthogonal complement of $xi$ is positive-definite is just basic linear algebra. If you want to see an easy moving-frames computation that this space has constant curvature $-1$, I'll show you that ... :)
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 25 at 22:34




1




1




Sure thing. If my answer here makes sense to you, I'll show you how things get modified in the $O(n,1)$ case. Just post a separate question.
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 26 at 0:13






Sure thing. If my answer here makes sense to you, I'll show you how things get modified in the $O(n,1)$ case. Just post a separate question.
– Ted Shifrin
Nov 26 at 0:13












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














We will prove $5)$. As differential manifold, $mathbb{H}^n$ is a regular submanifold of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ so we can identify tangent vectors in $mathbb{H}^n$ as velocities of differentiable curves in $mathbb{H}^n$. Take a point $p=(p_0,ldots,p_n)$ in $mathbb{H}^n$ and a differentiable curve $sigma : (-varepsilon,varepsilon)to mathbb{H}^n$ such that $sigma(0)=p$. Write the coordinates of $sigma$ as $sigma_0,ldots,sigma_n$ and let $v_i=frac{dsigma_i}{dt}(0)$ for every $i$. So we want to prove that $sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2>v_0^2$.



We have that $langle sigma(t),sigma(t) rangle =-1$ for every $t$. So in particular at $0$ we have that



$$
sum_{i=1}^np_i^2 = p_0^2-1
$$



On the other hand, by the product rule for derivatives we have that



$$
sum_{i=1}^nv_ip_i = v_0p_0
$$



So, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the first equation, it follows that



$$
v_0^2p_0^2=bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_ip_ibigg{)}^2leq bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^np_i^2bigg{)} = bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} bigg{(}p_0^2-1bigg{)} < bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} p_0^2
$$



We know that $p_0>0$ by definition of $mathbb{H}^n$ so the proposition follows.



EDIT: Sketch of $6)$. Let $mathbb{D}^n={xiinmathbb{R}^n:|xi|<1}$. Note that $f:mathbb{H}^ntomathbb{D}^n$ is defined by the formula
$$
f(x_0,ldots,x_n)=bigg{(}frac{x_1}{1+x_0},ldots,frac{x_n}{1+x_0}bigg{)}
$$



and it is differentiable. The inverse $f^{-1}:mathbb{D}^ntomathbb{H}^n$, defined by the formula



$$
f^{-1}(xi_1,ldots,xi_n)=bigg{(}frac{1+|xi|^2}{1-|xi|^2},frac{2xi_1}{1-|xi|^2},ldots,frac{2xi_n}{1-|xi|^2}bigg{)},
$$



is differentiable so $f$ is a diffeomorphism. Prove that the pullback by $f^{-1}$ of the metric defined in $mathbb{H}^n$ is equal to the metric given on $mathbb{D}^n$, that is



$$
bigg{langle} frac{partial f^{-1}}{partial xi_i}(xi),frac{partial f^{-1}}{partialxi_j}(xi) bigg{rangle} = frac{4delta_{ij}}{(1-|xi|^2)^2}
$$



for every $i,jin {1,ldots,n}$ and every $xiinmathbb{D}^n$.



Note that $6)$ implies $5)$ because the pullback by a diffeomorphism of a riemannian metric is a riemannian metric.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your time. I very much appreciate this.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 20:20










  • You are welcome! Please select my answer as the "accepted" answer if it works for you. See: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5234/…
    – Dante Grevino
    Nov 25 at 20:42










  • Very pleased with this answer, thanks again.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 23:59











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012129%2fhyperbolic-geometry-representation-of-the-metric-in-a-chart%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














We will prove $5)$. As differential manifold, $mathbb{H}^n$ is a regular submanifold of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ so we can identify tangent vectors in $mathbb{H}^n$ as velocities of differentiable curves in $mathbb{H}^n$. Take a point $p=(p_0,ldots,p_n)$ in $mathbb{H}^n$ and a differentiable curve $sigma : (-varepsilon,varepsilon)to mathbb{H}^n$ such that $sigma(0)=p$. Write the coordinates of $sigma$ as $sigma_0,ldots,sigma_n$ and let $v_i=frac{dsigma_i}{dt}(0)$ for every $i$. So we want to prove that $sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2>v_0^2$.



We have that $langle sigma(t),sigma(t) rangle =-1$ for every $t$. So in particular at $0$ we have that



$$
sum_{i=1}^np_i^2 = p_0^2-1
$$



On the other hand, by the product rule for derivatives we have that



$$
sum_{i=1}^nv_ip_i = v_0p_0
$$



So, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the first equation, it follows that



$$
v_0^2p_0^2=bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_ip_ibigg{)}^2leq bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^np_i^2bigg{)} = bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} bigg{(}p_0^2-1bigg{)} < bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} p_0^2
$$



We know that $p_0>0$ by definition of $mathbb{H}^n$ so the proposition follows.



EDIT: Sketch of $6)$. Let $mathbb{D}^n={xiinmathbb{R}^n:|xi|<1}$. Note that $f:mathbb{H}^ntomathbb{D}^n$ is defined by the formula
$$
f(x_0,ldots,x_n)=bigg{(}frac{x_1}{1+x_0},ldots,frac{x_n}{1+x_0}bigg{)}
$$



and it is differentiable. The inverse $f^{-1}:mathbb{D}^ntomathbb{H}^n$, defined by the formula



$$
f^{-1}(xi_1,ldots,xi_n)=bigg{(}frac{1+|xi|^2}{1-|xi|^2},frac{2xi_1}{1-|xi|^2},ldots,frac{2xi_n}{1-|xi|^2}bigg{)},
$$



is differentiable so $f$ is a diffeomorphism. Prove that the pullback by $f^{-1}$ of the metric defined in $mathbb{H}^n$ is equal to the metric given on $mathbb{D}^n$, that is



$$
bigg{langle} frac{partial f^{-1}}{partial xi_i}(xi),frac{partial f^{-1}}{partialxi_j}(xi) bigg{rangle} = frac{4delta_{ij}}{(1-|xi|^2)^2}
$$



for every $i,jin {1,ldots,n}$ and every $xiinmathbb{D}^n$.



Note that $6)$ implies $5)$ because the pullback by a diffeomorphism of a riemannian metric is a riemannian metric.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your time. I very much appreciate this.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 20:20










  • You are welcome! Please select my answer as the "accepted" answer if it works for you. See: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5234/…
    – Dante Grevino
    Nov 25 at 20:42










  • Very pleased with this answer, thanks again.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 23:59
















3














We will prove $5)$. As differential manifold, $mathbb{H}^n$ is a regular submanifold of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ so we can identify tangent vectors in $mathbb{H}^n$ as velocities of differentiable curves in $mathbb{H}^n$. Take a point $p=(p_0,ldots,p_n)$ in $mathbb{H}^n$ and a differentiable curve $sigma : (-varepsilon,varepsilon)to mathbb{H}^n$ such that $sigma(0)=p$. Write the coordinates of $sigma$ as $sigma_0,ldots,sigma_n$ and let $v_i=frac{dsigma_i}{dt}(0)$ for every $i$. So we want to prove that $sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2>v_0^2$.



We have that $langle sigma(t),sigma(t) rangle =-1$ for every $t$. So in particular at $0$ we have that



$$
sum_{i=1}^np_i^2 = p_0^2-1
$$



On the other hand, by the product rule for derivatives we have that



$$
sum_{i=1}^nv_ip_i = v_0p_0
$$



So, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the first equation, it follows that



$$
v_0^2p_0^2=bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_ip_ibigg{)}^2leq bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^np_i^2bigg{)} = bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} bigg{(}p_0^2-1bigg{)} < bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} p_0^2
$$



We know that $p_0>0$ by definition of $mathbb{H}^n$ so the proposition follows.



EDIT: Sketch of $6)$. Let $mathbb{D}^n={xiinmathbb{R}^n:|xi|<1}$. Note that $f:mathbb{H}^ntomathbb{D}^n$ is defined by the formula
$$
f(x_0,ldots,x_n)=bigg{(}frac{x_1}{1+x_0},ldots,frac{x_n}{1+x_0}bigg{)}
$$



and it is differentiable. The inverse $f^{-1}:mathbb{D}^ntomathbb{H}^n$, defined by the formula



$$
f^{-1}(xi_1,ldots,xi_n)=bigg{(}frac{1+|xi|^2}{1-|xi|^2},frac{2xi_1}{1-|xi|^2},ldots,frac{2xi_n}{1-|xi|^2}bigg{)},
$$



is differentiable so $f$ is a diffeomorphism. Prove that the pullback by $f^{-1}$ of the metric defined in $mathbb{H}^n$ is equal to the metric given on $mathbb{D}^n$, that is



$$
bigg{langle} frac{partial f^{-1}}{partial xi_i}(xi),frac{partial f^{-1}}{partialxi_j}(xi) bigg{rangle} = frac{4delta_{ij}}{(1-|xi|^2)^2}
$$



for every $i,jin {1,ldots,n}$ and every $xiinmathbb{D}^n$.



Note that $6)$ implies $5)$ because the pullback by a diffeomorphism of a riemannian metric is a riemannian metric.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your time. I very much appreciate this.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 20:20










  • You are welcome! Please select my answer as the "accepted" answer if it works for you. See: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5234/…
    – Dante Grevino
    Nov 25 at 20:42










  • Very pleased with this answer, thanks again.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 23:59














3












3








3






We will prove $5)$. As differential manifold, $mathbb{H}^n$ is a regular submanifold of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ so we can identify tangent vectors in $mathbb{H}^n$ as velocities of differentiable curves in $mathbb{H}^n$. Take a point $p=(p_0,ldots,p_n)$ in $mathbb{H}^n$ and a differentiable curve $sigma : (-varepsilon,varepsilon)to mathbb{H}^n$ such that $sigma(0)=p$. Write the coordinates of $sigma$ as $sigma_0,ldots,sigma_n$ and let $v_i=frac{dsigma_i}{dt}(0)$ for every $i$. So we want to prove that $sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2>v_0^2$.



We have that $langle sigma(t),sigma(t) rangle =-1$ for every $t$. So in particular at $0$ we have that



$$
sum_{i=1}^np_i^2 = p_0^2-1
$$



On the other hand, by the product rule for derivatives we have that



$$
sum_{i=1}^nv_ip_i = v_0p_0
$$



So, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the first equation, it follows that



$$
v_0^2p_0^2=bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_ip_ibigg{)}^2leq bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^np_i^2bigg{)} = bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} bigg{(}p_0^2-1bigg{)} < bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} p_0^2
$$



We know that $p_0>0$ by definition of $mathbb{H}^n$ so the proposition follows.



EDIT: Sketch of $6)$. Let $mathbb{D}^n={xiinmathbb{R}^n:|xi|<1}$. Note that $f:mathbb{H}^ntomathbb{D}^n$ is defined by the formula
$$
f(x_0,ldots,x_n)=bigg{(}frac{x_1}{1+x_0},ldots,frac{x_n}{1+x_0}bigg{)}
$$



and it is differentiable. The inverse $f^{-1}:mathbb{D}^ntomathbb{H}^n$, defined by the formula



$$
f^{-1}(xi_1,ldots,xi_n)=bigg{(}frac{1+|xi|^2}{1-|xi|^2},frac{2xi_1}{1-|xi|^2},ldots,frac{2xi_n}{1-|xi|^2}bigg{)},
$$



is differentiable so $f$ is a diffeomorphism. Prove that the pullback by $f^{-1}$ of the metric defined in $mathbb{H}^n$ is equal to the metric given on $mathbb{D}^n$, that is



$$
bigg{langle} frac{partial f^{-1}}{partial xi_i}(xi),frac{partial f^{-1}}{partialxi_j}(xi) bigg{rangle} = frac{4delta_{ij}}{(1-|xi|^2)^2}
$$



for every $i,jin {1,ldots,n}$ and every $xiinmathbb{D}^n$.



Note that $6)$ implies $5)$ because the pullback by a diffeomorphism of a riemannian metric is a riemannian metric.






share|cite|improve this answer














We will prove $5)$. As differential manifold, $mathbb{H}^n$ is a regular submanifold of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ so we can identify tangent vectors in $mathbb{H}^n$ as velocities of differentiable curves in $mathbb{H}^n$. Take a point $p=(p_0,ldots,p_n)$ in $mathbb{H}^n$ and a differentiable curve $sigma : (-varepsilon,varepsilon)to mathbb{H}^n$ such that $sigma(0)=p$. Write the coordinates of $sigma$ as $sigma_0,ldots,sigma_n$ and let $v_i=frac{dsigma_i}{dt}(0)$ for every $i$. So we want to prove that $sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2>v_0^2$.



We have that $langle sigma(t),sigma(t) rangle =-1$ for every $t$. So in particular at $0$ we have that



$$
sum_{i=1}^np_i^2 = p_0^2-1
$$



On the other hand, by the product rule for derivatives we have that



$$
sum_{i=1}^nv_ip_i = v_0p_0
$$



So, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the first equation, it follows that



$$
v_0^2p_0^2=bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_ip_ibigg{)}^2leq bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^np_i^2bigg{)} = bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} bigg{(}p_0^2-1bigg{)} < bigg{(}sum_{i=1}^nv_i^2bigg{)} p_0^2
$$



We know that $p_0>0$ by definition of $mathbb{H}^n$ so the proposition follows.



EDIT: Sketch of $6)$. Let $mathbb{D}^n={xiinmathbb{R}^n:|xi|<1}$. Note that $f:mathbb{H}^ntomathbb{D}^n$ is defined by the formula
$$
f(x_0,ldots,x_n)=bigg{(}frac{x_1}{1+x_0},ldots,frac{x_n}{1+x_0}bigg{)}
$$



and it is differentiable. The inverse $f^{-1}:mathbb{D}^ntomathbb{H}^n$, defined by the formula



$$
f^{-1}(xi_1,ldots,xi_n)=bigg{(}frac{1+|xi|^2}{1-|xi|^2},frac{2xi_1}{1-|xi|^2},ldots,frac{2xi_n}{1-|xi|^2}bigg{)},
$$



is differentiable so $f$ is a diffeomorphism. Prove that the pullback by $f^{-1}$ of the metric defined in $mathbb{H}^n$ is equal to the metric given on $mathbb{D}^n$, that is



$$
bigg{langle} frac{partial f^{-1}}{partial xi_i}(xi),frac{partial f^{-1}}{partialxi_j}(xi) bigg{rangle} = frac{4delta_{ij}}{(1-|xi|^2)^2}
$$



for every $i,jin {1,ldots,n}$ and every $xiinmathbb{D}^n$.



Note that $6)$ implies $5)$ because the pullback by a diffeomorphism of a riemannian metric is a riemannian metric.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 25 at 3:57

























answered Nov 25 at 2:00









Dante Grevino

90618




90618












  • Thank you for your time. I very much appreciate this.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 20:20










  • You are welcome! Please select my answer as the "accepted" answer if it works for you. See: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5234/…
    – Dante Grevino
    Nov 25 at 20:42










  • Very pleased with this answer, thanks again.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 23:59


















  • Thank you for your time. I very much appreciate this.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 20:20










  • You are welcome! Please select my answer as the "accepted" answer if it works for you. See: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5234/…
    – Dante Grevino
    Nov 25 at 20:42










  • Very pleased with this answer, thanks again.
    – AmorFati
    Nov 25 at 23:59
















Thank you for your time. I very much appreciate this.
– AmorFati
Nov 25 at 20:20




Thank you for your time. I very much appreciate this.
– AmorFati
Nov 25 at 20:20












You are welcome! Please select my answer as the "accepted" answer if it works for you. See: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5234/…
– Dante Grevino
Nov 25 at 20:42




You are welcome! Please select my answer as the "accepted" answer if it works for you. See: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5234/…
– Dante Grevino
Nov 25 at 20:42












Very pleased with this answer, thanks again.
– AmorFati
Nov 25 at 23:59




Very pleased with this answer, thanks again.
– AmorFati
Nov 25 at 23:59


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012129%2fhyperbolic-geometry-representation-of-the-metric-in-a-chart%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix