Does $f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^{infty} e^{-xi}y(1-y)^{i-1}$ have a closed form?












1














Does $f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^{infty} e^{-xi}y(1-y)^{i-1}$ have a closed form? $y$ is assumed to be in $[0,1]$ and $x >0$.



What I tried: I tried differentiating/integrating the function term by term to see whether those are something that can be calculated, but it seems that this method did not work.










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    Does $f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^{infty} e^{-xi}y(1-y)^{i-1}$ have a closed form? $y$ is assumed to be in $[0,1]$ and $x >0$.



    What I tried: I tried differentiating/integrating the function term by term to see whether those are something that can be calculated, but it seems that this method did not work.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      Does $f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^{infty} e^{-xi}y(1-y)^{i-1}$ have a closed form? $y$ is assumed to be in $[0,1]$ and $x >0$.



      What I tried: I tried differentiating/integrating the function term by term to see whether those are something that can be calculated, but it seems that this method did not work.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Does $f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^{infty} e^{-xi}y(1-y)^{i-1}$ have a closed form? $y$ is assumed to be in $[0,1]$ and $x >0$.



      What I tried: I tried differentiating/integrating the function term by term to see whether those are something that can be calculated, but it seems that this method did not work.







      real-analysis analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 24 at 22:24









      penny

      635




      635






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          Observe
          begin{align}
          f(x) = frac{y}{1-y}sum^infty_{i=1} [e^{-x}(1-y)]^i
          end{align}

          then use geometric series.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • (The case $y=1$ obviously has to be dealt with separately.)
            – Clement C.
            Nov 24 at 23:35










          • @ClementC. Yes. I will leave it as an exercise. =)
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 24 at 23:43










          • ^ Seems pretty easy, at least: looking at the original form, $y=0$ gives $f(x)=sum0$—am I right? (@ClementC.)
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Nov 24 at 23:44










          • @ChaseRyanTaylor Yes, of course: for $y=0$, the infinite sum simplifies pretty easily (be slightly careful though -- there is still one non-zero term)
            – Clement C.
            Nov 25 at 0:00










          • @ClementC. Which term is that?
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Nov 25 at 0:12











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012176%2fdoes-fx-sum-i-1-infty-e-xiy1-yi-1-have-a-closed-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6














          Observe
          begin{align}
          f(x) = frac{y}{1-y}sum^infty_{i=1} [e^{-x}(1-y)]^i
          end{align}

          then use geometric series.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • (The case $y=1$ obviously has to be dealt with separately.)
            – Clement C.
            Nov 24 at 23:35










          • @ClementC. Yes. I will leave it as an exercise. =)
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 24 at 23:43










          • ^ Seems pretty easy, at least: looking at the original form, $y=0$ gives $f(x)=sum0$—am I right? (@ClementC.)
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Nov 24 at 23:44










          • @ChaseRyanTaylor Yes, of course: for $y=0$, the infinite sum simplifies pretty easily (be slightly careful though -- there is still one non-zero term)
            – Clement C.
            Nov 25 at 0:00










          • @ClementC. Which term is that?
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Nov 25 at 0:12
















          6














          Observe
          begin{align}
          f(x) = frac{y}{1-y}sum^infty_{i=1} [e^{-x}(1-y)]^i
          end{align}

          then use geometric series.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • (The case $y=1$ obviously has to be dealt with separately.)
            – Clement C.
            Nov 24 at 23:35










          • @ClementC. Yes. I will leave it as an exercise. =)
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 24 at 23:43










          • ^ Seems pretty easy, at least: looking at the original form, $y=0$ gives $f(x)=sum0$—am I right? (@ClementC.)
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Nov 24 at 23:44










          • @ChaseRyanTaylor Yes, of course: for $y=0$, the infinite sum simplifies pretty easily (be slightly careful though -- there is still one non-zero term)
            – Clement C.
            Nov 25 at 0:00










          • @ClementC. Which term is that?
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Nov 25 at 0:12














          6












          6








          6






          Observe
          begin{align}
          f(x) = frac{y}{1-y}sum^infty_{i=1} [e^{-x}(1-y)]^i
          end{align}

          then use geometric series.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Observe
          begin{align}
          f(x) = frac{y}{1-y}sum^infty_{i=1} [e^{-x}(1-y)]^i
          end{align}

          then use geometric series.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 24 at 22:26









          Jacky Chong

          17.6k21128




          17.6k21128












          • (The case $y=1$ obviously has to be dealt with separately.)
            – Clement C.
            Nov 24 at 23:35










          • @ClementC. Yes. I will leave it as an exercise. =)
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 24 at 23:43










          • ^ Seems pretty easy, at least: looking at the original form, $y=0$ gives $f(x)=sum0$—am I right? (@ClementC.)
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Nov 24 at 23:44










          • @ChaseRyanTaylor Yes, of course: for $y=0$, the infinite sum simplifies pretty easily (be slightly careful though -- there is still one non-zero term)
            – Clement C.
            Nov 25 at 0:00










          • @ClementC. Which term is that?
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Nov 25 at 0:12


















          • (The case $y=1$ obviously has to be dealt with separately.)
            – Clement C.
            Nov 24 at 23:35










          • @ClementC. Yes. I will leave it as an exercise. =)
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 24 at 23:43










          • ^ Seems pretty easy, at least: looking at the original form, $y=0$ gives $f(x)=sum0$—am I right? (@ClementC.)
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Nov 24 at 23:44










          • @ChaseRyanTaylor Yes, of course: for $y=0$, the infinite sum simplifies pretty easily (be slightly careful though -- there is still one non-zero term)
            – Clement C.
            Nov 25 at 0:00










          • @ClementC. Which term is that?
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Nov 25 at 0:12
















          (The case $y=1$ obviously has to be dealt with separately.)
          – Clement C.
          Nov 24 at 23:35




          (The case $y=1$ obviously has to be dealt with separately.)
          – Clement C.
          Nov 24 at 23:35












          @ClementC. Yes. I will leave it as an exercise. =)
          – Jacky Chong
          Nov 24 at 23:43




          @ClementC. Yes. I will leave it as an exercise. =)
          – Jacky Chong
          Nov 24 at 23:43












          ^ Seems pretty easy, at least: looking at the original form, $y=0$ gives $f(x)=sum0$—am I right? (@ClementC.)
          – Chase Ryan Taylor
          Nov 24 at 23:44




          ^ Seems pretty easy, at least: looking at the original form, $y=0$ gives $f(x)=sum0$—am I right? (@ClementC.)
          – Chase Ryan Taylor
          Nov 24 at 23:44












          @ChaseRyanTaylor Yes, of course: for $y=0$, the infinite sum simplifies pretty easily (be slightly careful though -- there is still one non-zero term)
          – Clement C.
          Nov 25 at 0:00




          @ChaseRyanTaylor Yes, of course: for $y=0$, the infinite sum simplifies pretty easily (be slightly careful though -- there is still one non-zero term)
          – Clement C.
          Nov 25 at 0:00












          @ClementC. Which term is that?
          – Chase Ryan Taylor
          Nov 25 at 0:12




          @ClementC. Which term is that?
          – Chase Ryan Taylor
          Nov 25 at 0:12


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012176%2fdoes-fx-sum-i-1-infty-e-xiy1-yi-1-have-a-closed-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

          When does type information flow backwards in C++?

          Grease: Live!