What happens when I Twin Life Transference?












19












$begingroup$


The Life Transference spell states:




You sacrifice some of your health to mend another creature’s injuries.
You take 4d8 necrotic damage, and one creature of your choice that you
can see within range regains a number of hit points equal to twice the
necrotic damage you take.




The Twinned Spell Sorcerer Metamagic states:




When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn't have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell's level to target a second creature in range with the same spell.




Life Transference doesn't necessarily target me, nor does it have a range of Self, but it does affect me. Additionally, Twinned Spell does not say that it copies the spell, but that it makes the spell have a second target, and the standard target receives healing based on the damage I take.




So what happens when I try to Twin Life Transference?



Do I:




  • Cast the spell, healing two targets and spend the life cost once?

  • Cast the spell, healing two targets and spend the life cost twice?

  • Fail to Twin the spell, due to the fact that it affects myself?


Or something else entirely?






dnd-5e spells metamagic targeting spell-slots







share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Related (not a dupe!) Can a persistent spell cast using the Sorcerer's Metamagic Twinned Spell affect both spells?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Feb 26 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Also a note: This spell is not on the Sorcerer's list and would require multiclassing to access.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Feb 26 at 21:44










  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Can a Sorcerer Twin Telekinesis, Eyebite, and Bigby's Hand?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 26 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    A small note: If Life Transference is disqualified for Twinned Spell for the sake of affecting the caster, other spells may fall under the same disqualification (such as Warding Bond).
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Zastoupil
    Feb 26 at 22:40






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch If you are a Divine Soul sorcerer (Xanathar's Guide), you can get "Life Transference" as a cleric spell.
    $endgroup$
    – The Hidden DM
    Feb 26 at 23:12
















19












$begingroup$


The Life Transference spell states:




You sacrifice some of your health to mend another creature’s injuries.
You take 4d8 necrotic damage, and one creature of your choice that you
can see within range regains a number of hit points equal to twice the
necrotic damage you take.




The Twinned Spell Sorcerer Metamagic states:




When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn't have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell's level to target a second creature in range with the same spell.




Life Transference doesn't necessarily target me, nor does it have a range of Self, but it does affect me. Additionally, Twinned Spell does not say that it copies the spell, but that it makes the spell have a second target, and the standard target receives healing based on the damage I take.




So what happens when I try to Twin Life Transference?



Do I:




  • Cast the spell, healing two targets and spend the life cost once?

  • Cast the spell, healing two targets and spend the life cost twice?

  • Fail to Twin the spell, due to the fact that it affects myself?


Or something else entirely?






dnd-5e spells metamagic targeting spell-slots







share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Related (not a dupe!) Can a persistent spell cast using the Sorcerer's Metamagic Twinned Spell affect both spells?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Feb 26 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Also a note: This spell is not on the Sorcerer's list and would require multiclassing to access.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Feb 26 at 21:44










  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Can a Sorcerer Twin Telekinesis, Eyebite, and Bigby's Hand?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 26 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    A small note: If Life Transference is disqualified for Twinned Spell for the sake of affecting the caster, other spells may fall under the same disqualification (such as Warding Bond).
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Zastoupil
    Feb 26 at 22:40






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch If you are a Divine Soul sorcerer (Xanathar's Guide), you can get "Life Transference" as a cleric spell.
    $endgroup$
    – The Hidden DM
    Feb 26 at 23:12














19












19








19


3



$begingroup$


The Life Transference spell states:




You sacrifice some of your health to mend another creature’s injuries.
You take 4d8 necrotic damage, and one creature of your choice that you
can see within range regains a number of hit points equal to twice the
necrotic damage you take.




The Twinned Spell Sorcerer Metamagic states:




When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn't have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell's level to target a second creature in range with the same spell.




Life Transference doesn't necessarily target me, nor does it have a range of Self, but it does affect me. Additionally, Twinned Spell does not say that it copies the spell, but that it makes the spell have a second target, and the standard target receives healing based on the damage I take.




So what happens when I try to Twin Life Transference?



Do I:




  • Cast the spell, healing two targets and spend the life cost once?

  • Cast the spell, healing two targets and spend the life cost twice?

  • Fail to Twin the spell, due to the fact that it affects myself?


Or something else entirely?






dnd-5e spells metamagic targeting spell-slots







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The Life Transference spell states:




You sacrifice some of your health to mend another creature’s injuries.
You take 4d8 necrotic damage, and one creature of your choice that you
can see within range regains a number of hit points equal to twice the
necrotic damage you take.




The Twinned Spell Sorcerer Metamagic states:




When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn't have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell's level to target a second creature in range with the same spell.




Life Transference doesn't necessarily target me, nor does it have a range of Self, but it does affect me. Additionally, Twinned Spell does not say that it copies the spell, but that it makes the spell have a second target, and the standard target receives healing based on the damage I take.




So what happens when I try to Twin Life Transference?



Do I:




  • Cast the spell, healing two targets and spend the life cost once?

  • Cast the spell, healing two targets and spend the life cost twice?

  • Fail to Twin the spell, due to the fact that it affects myself?


Or something else entirely?






dnd-5e spells metamagic targeting spell-slots




dnd-5e spells metamagic targeting spell-slots






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 26 at 21:00









PixelMaster

12.3k347116




12.3k347116










asked Feb 26 at 20:30









Daniel ZastoupilDaniel Zastoupil

8,82312395




8,82312395












  • $begingroup$
    Related (not a dupe!) Can a persistent spell cast using the Sorcerer's Metamagic Twinned Spell affect both spells?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Feb 26 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Also a note: This spell is not on the Sorcerer's list and would require multiclassing to access.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Feb 26 at 21:44










  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Can a Sorcerer Twin Telekinesis, Eyebite, and Bigby's Hand?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 26 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    A small note: If Life Transference is disqualified for Twinned Spell for the sake of affecting the caster, other spells may fall under the same disqualification (such as Warding Bond).
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Zastoupil
    Feb 26 at 22:40






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch If you are a Divine Soul sorcerer (Xanathar's Guide), you can get "Life Transference" as a cleric spell.
    $endgroup$
    – The Hidden DM
    Feb 26 at 23:12


















  • $begingroup$
    Related (not a dupe!) Can a persistent spell cast using the Sorcerer's Metamagic Twinned Spell affect both spells?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Feb 26 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Also a note: This spell is not on the Sorcerer's list and would require multiclassing to access.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Feb 26 at 21:44










  • $begingroup$
    Also related: Can a Sorcerer Twin Telekinesis, Eyebite, and Bigby's Hand?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 26 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    A small note: If Life Transference is disqualified for Twinned Spell for the sake of affecting the caster, other spells may fall under the same disqualification (such as Warding Bond).
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Zastoupil
    Feb 26 at 22:40






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch If you are a Divine Soul sorcerer (Xanathar's Guide), you can get "Life Transference" as a cleric spell.
    $endgroup$
    – The Hidden DM
    Feb 26 at 23:12
















$begingroup$
Related (not a dupe!) Can a persistent spell cast using the Sorcerer's Metamagic Twinned Spell affect both spells?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 26 at 21:31




$begingroup$
Related (not a dupe!) Can a persistent spell cast using the Sorcerer's Metamagic Twinned Spell affect both spells?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 26 at 21:31












$begingroup$
Also a note: This spell is not on the Sorcerer's list and would require multiclassing to access.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 26 at 21:44




$begingroup$
Also a note: This spell is not on the Sorcerer's list and would require multiclassing to access.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Feb 26 at 21:44












$begingroup$
Also related: Can a Sorcerer Twin Telekinesis, Eyebite, and Bigby's Hand?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Feb 26 at 22:14




$begingroup$
Also related: Can a Sorcerer Twin Telekinesis, Eyebite, and Bigby's Hand?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Feb 26 at 22:14












$begingroup$
A small note: If Life Transference is disqualified for Twinned Spell for the sake of affecting the caster, other spells may fall under the same disqualification (such as Warding Bond).
$endgroup$
– Daniel Zastoupil
Feb 26 at 22:40




$begingroup$
A small note: If Life Transference is disqualified for Twinned Spell for the sake of affecting the caster, other spells may fall under the same disqualification (such as Warding Bond).
$endgroup$
– Daniel Zastoupil
Feb 26 at 22:40




3




3




$begingroup$
@NautArch If you are a Divine Soul sorcerer (Xanathar's Guide), you can get "Life Transference" as a cleric spell.
$endgroup$
– The Hidden DM
Feb 26 at 23:12




$begingroup$
@NautArch If you are a Divine Soul sorcerer (Xanathar's Guide), you can get "Life Transference" as a cleric spell.
$endgroup$
– The Hidden DM
Feb 26 at 23:12










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















15












$begingroup$

Option 1: Once Damaged, Twice Healed



Assuming Life Transference is valid for use with Twinned spell (see below), the key phrasing that leads to this outcome is the following from the Twinned Spell description:




...you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell's level to target a second creature in range with the same spell.




This specifies that we don't cast the spell twice, but rather the effect of the same spell applies to two targets instead of one.



The relevant part of Life Transference is:




You take 4d8 necrotic damage, and one creature of your choice that you can see within range regains a number of hit points equal to twice the necrotic damage you take.




The amount the target gains is equal to what you lost. Splitting wouldn't meet the effect of having each target gain an amount equal to what you lost. It's worth noting that spells that deal damage aren't split either, so it shouldn't for healing.



However...



There's an argument to be made that Life Transference targets both the creature and yourself, as you pointed out yourself in option 3. Under this interpretation, Life Transference would not be a valid spell for use with Twinned Spell.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here's a related discussion of this exact question on the D&D Beyond forums.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 26 at 22:22








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    While you can make an argument that it "targets" both creatures, that's not what the target in the spell entry says, and that has to be RAW. I don't think you need the caveats: you're right without them.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael W.
    Feb 26 at 22:59






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @MichaelW. to be fair, one of the most frustrating things about 5e spellcasting rules is the seemingly scattershot way they use the word "target" and the fact that they never define it in a focused way anywhere. Designers seem to contradict the RAW and the RAW even contradicts itself seemingly several times.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Feb 27 at 14:15





















7












$begingroup$

You cannot twin life transference.



Based on the extensive discussion Jeremy Crawford did in the January 19th, 2017 episode of the official DragonTalk podcast about spell targeting in general and twinning in specific, life transference is not a valid spell for twinning.



When the Twinned Spell metamagic says "target", it does not just mean "in the target line of the spell", but rather "affect in any way". He was very clear on this point; spells like green-fire blade or ice knife -- which attack a single creature but then deal damage to another creature or a zone around that initial target -- are not valid for twinning because they have the capability to affect more than one creature. Based on this, you are indeed a target of your own life transference spell, thus the spell targets two creatures and is not valid for twinning.



Podcast time codes:




  • 5:20 - Beginning of the Sage Advice segment

  • 10:20 - What do we mean when we say "target"?

  • 19:20 - Discussion of twinned spells begins

  • 28:30 - How twin works with spells that have secondary targets






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does this mean that a spell like Warding Bond cannot be twinned either?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Zastoupil
    Feb 27 at 14:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielZastoupil That is correct. Warding bond affects more than one creature and thus would not be applicable for twinning by JC's clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Feb 27 at 15:45












  • $begingroup$
    Though I agree it's a compelling point and certain spells are specifically called out for affecting other creatures in specific ways, even that isn't a clear cut solution. The Jump spell says "You touch a creature". Have I been affected in any way? Well, yes, but actually no. You might say then that it must be a mechanical effect, but then what about Levitate? "You can change the target's altitude by up to 20 feet in either direction on your turn". You are clearly affected in some way by the spell, but I've never seen a case made against twinning either of those spells.
    $endgroup$
    – Mwr247
    Feb 27 at 16:15








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The delivery method of a spell certainly doesn't count as being affected by it. I don't see how controlling a spell you previously cast could possibly constitute being affected by the spell either, but I suppose I can at least see that being a point of discussion. However, that isn't the question at hand; if the spell is dealing damage to you or healing you, there is just no possible way to interpret that as not "affecting" you. You are absolutely a target of your own life transference.
    $endgroup$
    – Darth Pseudonym
    Feb 27 at 16:37








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Some would argue that the damage is part of the delivery method. The challenge isn't that it's not affecting you, but rather that defining "targets" as being "affected in any way" doesn't clear things up as a general solution, because now we need a proper definition of what it means to be affected. Both the examples I gave above do affect the caster as do many other spells, albeit in different ways, but are twinnable. The point I'm trying to make is that while there are perfectly valid arguments to be made for and against Life Transference, I don't think being "affected" clears it up.
    $endgroup$
    – Mwr247
    Feb 27 at 16:57












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142042%2fwhat-happens-when-i-twin-life-transference%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









15












$begingroup$

Option 1: Once Damaged, Twice Healed



Assuming Life Transference is valid for use with Twinned spell (see below), the key phrasing that leads to this outcome is the following from the Twinned Spell description:




...you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell's level to target a second creature in range with the same spell.




This specifies that we don't cast the spell twice, but rather the effect of the same spell applies to two targets instead of one.



The relevant part of Life Transference is:




You take 4d8 necrotic damage, and one creature of your choice that you can see within range regains a number of hit points equal to twice the necrotic damage you take.




The amount the target gains is equal to what you lost. Splitting wouldn't meet the effect of having each target gain an amount equal to what you lost. It's worth noting that spells that deal damage aren't split either, so it shouldn't for healing.



However...



There's an argument to be made that Life Transference targets both the creature and yourself, as you pointed out yourself in option 3. Under this interpretation, Life Transference would not be a valid spell for use with Twinned Spell.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here's a related discussion of this exact question on the D&D Beyond forums.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 26 at 22:22








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    While you can make an argument that it "targets" both creatures, that's not what the target in the spell entry says, and that has to be RAW. I don't think you need the caveats: you're right without them.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael W.
    Feb 26 at 22:59






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @MichaelW. to be fair, one of the most frustrating things about 5e spellcasting rules is the seemingly scattershot way they use the word "target" and the fact that they never define it in a focused way anywhere. Designers seem to contradict the RAW and the RAW even contradicts itself seemingly several times.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Feb 27 at 14:15


















15












$begingroup$

Option 1: Once Damaged, Twice Healed



Assuming Life Transference is valid for use with Twinned spell (see below), the key phrasing that leads to this outcome is the following from the Twinned Spell description:




...you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell's level to target a second creature in range with the same spell.




This specifies that we don't cast the spell twice, but rather the effect of the same spell applies to two targets instead of one.



The relevant part of Life Transference is:




You take 4d8 necrotic damage, and one creature of your choice that you can see within range regains a number of hit points equal to twice the necrotic damage you take.




The amount the target gains is equal to what you lost. Splitting wouldn't meet the effect of having each target gain an amount equal to what you lost. It's worth noting that spells that deal damage aren't split either, so it shouldn't for healing.



However...



There's an argument to be made that Life Transference targets both the creature and yourself, as you pointed out yourself in option 3. Under this interpretation, Life Transference would not be a valid spell for use with Twinned Spell.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here's a related discussion of this exact question on the D&D Beyond forums.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 26 at 22:22








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    While you can make an argument that it "targets" both creatures, that's not what the target in the spell entry says, and that has to be RAW. I don't think you need the caveats: you're right without them.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael W.
    Feb 26 at 22:59






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @MichaelW. to be fair, one of the most frustrating things about 5e spellcasting rules is the seemingly scattershot way they use the word "target" and the fact that they never define it in a focused way anywhere. Designers seem to contradict the RAW and the RAW even contradicts itself seemingly several times.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Feb 27 at 14:15
















15












15








15





$begingroup$

Option 1: Once Damaged, Twice Healed



Assuming Life Transference is valid for use with Twinned spell (see below), the key phrasing that leads to this outcome is the following from the Twinned Spell description:




...you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell's level to target a second creature in range with the same spell.




This specifies that we don't cast the spell twice, but rather the effect of the same spell applies to two targets instead of one.



The relevant part of Life Transference is:




You take 4d8 necrotic damage, and one creature of your choice that you can see within range regains a number of hit points equal to twice the necrotic damage you take.




The amount the target gains is equal to what you lost. Splitting wouldn't meet the effect of having each target gain an amount equal to what you lost. It's worth noting that spells that deal damage aren't split either, so it shouldn't for healing.



However...



There's an argument to be made that Life Transference targets both the creature and yourself, as you pointed out yourself in option 3. Under this interpretation, Life Transference would not be a valid spell for use with Twinned Spell.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Option 1: Once Damaged, Twice Healed



Assuming Life Transference is valid for use with Twinned spell (see below), the key phrasing that leads to this outcome is the following from the Twinned Spell description:




...you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell's level to target a second creature in range with the same spell.




This specifies that we don't cast the spell twice, but rather the effect of the same spell applies to two targets instead of one.



The relevant part of Life Transference is:




You take 4d8 necrotic damage, and one creature of your choice that you can see within range regains a number of hit points equal to twice the necrotic damage you take.




The amount the target gains is equal to what you lost. Splitting wouldn't meet the effect of having each target gain an amount equal to what you lost. It's worth noting that spells that deal damage aren't split either, so it shouldn't for healing.



However...



There's an argument to be made that Life Transference targets both the creature and yourself, as you pointed out yourself in option 3. Under this interpretation, Life Transference would not be a valid spell for use with Twinned Spell.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 26 at 21:39

























answered Feb 26 at 21:26









Mwr247Mwr247

2,6371325




2,6371325








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here's a related discussion of this exact question on the D&D Beyond forums.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 26 at 22:22








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    While you can make an argument that it "targets" both creatures, that's not what the target in the spell entry says, and that has to be RAW. I don't think you need the caveats: you're right without them.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael W.
    Feb 26 at 22:59






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @MichaelW. to be fair, one of the most frustrating things about 5e spellcasting rules is the seemingly scattershot way they use the word "target" and the fact that they never define it in a focused way anywhere. Designers seem to contradict the RAW and the RAW even contradicts itself seemingly several times.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Feb 27 at 14:15
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here's a related discussion of this exact question on the D&D Beyond forums.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 26 at 22:22








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    While you can make an argument that it "targets" both creatures, that's not what the target in the spell entry says, and that has to be RAW. I don't think you need the caveats: you're right without them.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael W.
    Feb 26 at 22:59






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @MichaelW. to be fair, one of the most frustrating things about 5e spellcasting rules is the seemingly scattershot way they use the word "target" and the fact that they never define it in a focused way anywhere. Designers seem to contradict the RAW and the RAW even contradicts itself seemingly several times.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Feb 27 at 14:15










1




1




$begingroup$
Here's a related discussion of this exact question on the D&D Beyond forums.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Feb 26 at 22:22






$begingroup$
Here's a related discussion of this exact question on the D&D Beyond forums.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Feb 26 at 22:22






2




2




$begingroup$
While you can make an argument that it "targets" both creatures, that's not what the target in the spell entry says, and that has to be RAW. I don't think you need the caveats: you're right without them.
$endgroup$
– Michael W.
Feb 26 at 22:59




$begingroup$
While you can make an argument that it "targets" both creatures, that's not what the target in the spell entry says, and that has to be RAW. I don't think you need the caveats: you're right without them.
$endgroup$
– Michael W.
Feb 26 at 22:59




2




2




$begingroup$
@MichaelW. to be fair, one of the most frustrating things about 5e spellcasting rules is the seemingly scattershot way they use the word "target" and the fact that they never define it in a focused way anywhere. Designers seem to contradict the RAW and the RAW even contradicts itself seemingly several times.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 27 at 14:15






$begingroup$
@MichaelW. to be fair, one of the most frustrating things about 5e spellcasting rules is the seemingly scattershot way they use the word "target" and the fact that they never define it in a focused way anywhere. Designers seem to contradict the RAW and the RAW even contradicts itself seemingly several times.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 27 at 14:15















7












$begingroup$

You cannot twin life transference.



Based on the extensive discussion Jeremy Crawford did in the January 19th, 2017 episode of the official DragonTalk podcast about spell targeting in general and twinning in specific, life transference is not a valid spell for twinning.



When the Twinned Spell metamagic says "target", it does not just mean "in the target line of the spell", but rather "affect in any way". He was very clear on this point; spells like green-fire blade or ice knife -- which attack a single creature but then deal damage to another creature or a zone around that initial target -- are not valid for twinning because they have the capability to affect more than one creature. Based on this, you are indeed a target of your own life transference spell, thus the spell targets two creatures and is not valid for twinning.



Podcast time codes:




  • 5:20 - Beginning of the Sage Advice segment

  • 10:20 - What do we mean when we say "target"?

  • 19:20 - Discussion of twinned spells begins

  • 28:30 - How twin works with spells that have secondary targets






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does this mean that a spell like Warding Bond cannot be twinned either?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Zastoupil
    Feb 27 at 14:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielZastoupil That is correct. Warding bond affects more than one creature and thus would not be applicable for twinning by JC's clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Feb 27 at 15:45












  • $begingroup$
    Though I agree it's a compelling point and certain spells are specifically called out for affecting other creatures in specific ways, even that isn't a clear cut solution. The Jump spell says "You touch a creature". Have I been affected in any way? Well, yes, but actually no. You might say then that it must be a mechanical effect, but then what about Levitate? "You can change the target's altitude by up to 20 feet in either direction on your turn". You are clearly affected in some way by the spell, but I've never seen a case made against twinning either of those spells.
    $endgroup$
    – Mwr247
    Feb 27 at 16:15








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The delivery method of a spell certainly doesn't count as being affected by it. I don't see how controlling a spell you previously cast could possibly constitute being affected by the spell either, but I suppose I can at least see that being a point of discussion. However, that isn't the question at hand; if the spell is dealing damage to you or healing you, there is just no possible way to interpret that as not "affecting" you. You are absolutely a target of your own life transference.
    $endgroup$
    – Darth Pseudonym
    Feb 27 at 16:37








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Some would argue that the damage is part of the delivery method. The challenge isn't that it's not affecting you, but rather that defining "targets" as being "affected in any way" doesn't clear things up as a general solution, because now we need a proper definition of what it means to be affected. Both the examples I gave above do affect the caster as do many other spells, albeit in different ways, but are twinnable. The point I'm trying to make is that while there are perfectly valid arguments to be made for and against Life Transference, I don't think being "affected" clears it up.
    $endgroup$
    – Mwr247
    Feb 27 at 16:57
















7












$begingroup$

You cannot twin life transference.



Based on the extensive discussion Jeremy Crawford did in the January 19th, 2017 episode of the official DragonTalk podcast about spell targeting in general and twinning in specific, life transference is not a valid spell for twinning.



When the Twinned Spell metamagic says "target", it does not just mean "in the target line of the spell", but rather "affect in any way". He was very clear on this point; spells like green-fire blade or ice knife -- which attack a single creature but then deal damage to another creature or a zone around that initial target -- are not valid for twinning because they have the capability to affect more than one creature. Based on this, you are indeed a target of your own life transference spell, thus the spell targets two creatures and is not valid for twinning.



Podcast time codes:




  • 5:20 - Beginning of the Sage Advice segment

  • 10:20 - What do we mean when we say "target"?

  • 19:20 - Discussion of twinned spells begins

  • 28:30 - How twin works with spells that have secondary targets






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does this mean that a spell like Warding Bond cannot be twinned either?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Zastoupil
    Feb 27 at 14:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielZastoupil That is correct. Warding bond affects more than one creature and thus would not be applicable for twinning by JC's clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Feb 27 at 15:45












  • $begingroup$
    Though I agree it's a compelling point and certain spells are specifically called out for affecting other creatures in specific ways, even that isn't a clear cut solution. The Jump spell says "You touch a creature". Have I been affected in any way? Well, yes, but actually no. You might say then that it must be a mechanical effect, but then what about Levitate? "You can change the target's altitude by up to 20 feet in either direction on your turn". You are clearly affected in some way by the spell, but I've never seen a case made against twinning either of those spells.
    $endgroup$
    – Mwr247
    Feb 27 at 16:15








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The delivery method of a spell certainly doesn't count as being affected by it. I don't see how controlling a spell you previously cast could possibly constitute being affected by the spell either, but I suppose I can at least see that being a point of discussion. However, that isn't the question at hand; if the spell is dealing damage to you or healing you, there is just no possible way to interpret that as not "affecting" you. You are absolutely a target of your own life transference.
    $endgroup$
    – Darth Pseudonym
    Feb 27 at 16:37








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Some would argue that the damage is part of the delivery method. The challenge isn't that it's not affecting you, but rather that defining "targets" as being "affected in any way" doesn't clear things up as a general solution, because now we need a proper definition of what it means to be affected. Both the examples I gave above do affect the caster as do many other spells, albeit in different ways, but are twinnable. The point I'm trying to make is that while there are perfectly valid arguments to be made for and against Life Transference, I don't think being "affected" clears it up.
    $endgroup$
    – Mwr247
    Feb 27 at 16:57














7












7








7





$begingroup$

You cannot twin life transference.



Based on the extensive discussion Jeremy Crawford did in the January 19th, 2017 episode of the official DragonTalk podcast about spell targeting in general and twinning in specific, life transference is not a valid spell for twinning.



When the Twinned Spell metamagic says "target", it does not just mean "in the target line of the spell", but rather "affect in any way". He was very clear on this point; spells like green-fire blade or ice knife -- which attack a single creature but then deal damage to another creature or a zone around that initial target -- are not valid for twinning because they have the capability to affect more than one creature. Based on this, you are indeed a target of your own life transference spell, thus the spell targets two creatures and is not valid for twinning.



Podcast time codes:




  • 5:20 - Beginning of the Sage Advice segment

  • 10:20 - What do we mean when we say "target"?

  • 19:20 - Discussion of twinned spells begins

  • 28:30 - How twin works with spells that have secondary targets






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



You cannot twin life transference.



Based on the extensive discussion Jeremy Crawford did in the January 19th, 2017 episode of the official DragonTalk podcast about spell targeting in general and twinning in specific, life transference is not a valid spell for twinning.



When the Twinned Spell metamagic says "target", it does not just mean "in the target line of the spell", but rather "affect in any way". He was very clear on this point; spells like green-fire blade or ice knife -- which attack a single creature but then deal damage to another creature or a zone around that initial target -- are not valid for twinning because they have the capability to affect more than one creature. Based on this, you are indeed a target of your own life transference spell, thus the spell targets two creatures and is not valid for twinning.



Podcast time codes:




  • 5:20 - Beginning of the Sage Advice segment

  • 10:20 - What do we mean when we say "target"?

  • 19:20 - Discussion of twinned spells begins

  • 28:30 - How twin works with spells that have secondary targets







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 27 at 13:32

























answered Feb 27 at 13:07









Darth PseudonymDarth Pseudonym

16k34088




16k34088








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does this mean that a spell like Warding Bond cannot be twinned either?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Zastoupil
    Feb 27 at 14:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielZastoupil That is correct. Warding bond affects more than one creature and thus would not be applicable for twinning by JC's clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Feb 27 at 15:45












  • $begingroup$
    Though I agree it's a compelling point and certain spells are specifically called out for affecting other creatures in specific ways, even that isn't a clear cut solution. The Jump spell says "You touch a creature". Have I been affected in any way? Well, yes, but actually no. You might say then that it must be a mechanical effect, but then what about Levitate? "You can change the target's altitude by up to 20 feet in either direction on your turn". You are clearly affected in some way by the spell, but I've never seen a case made against twinning either of those spells.
    $endgroup$
    – Mwr247
    Feb 27 at 16:15








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The delivery method of a spell certainly doesn't count as being affected by it. I don't see how controlling a spell you previously cast could possibly constitute being affected by the spell either, but I suppose I can at least see that being a point of discussion. However, that isn't the question at hand; if the spell is dealing damage to you or healing you, there is just no possible way to interpret that as not "affecting" you. You are absolutely a target of your own life transference.
    $endgroup$
    – Darth Pseudonym
    Feb 27 at 16:37








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Some would argue that the damage is part of the delivery method. The challenge isn't that it's not affecting you, but rather that defining "targets" as being "affected in any way" doesn't clear things up as a general solution, because now we need a proper definition of what it means to be affected. Both the examples I gave above do affect the caster as do many other spells, albeit in different ways, but are twinnable. The point I'm trying to make is that while there are perfectly valid arguments to be made for and against Life Transference, I don't think being "affected" clears it up.
    $endgroup$
    – Mwr247
    Feb 27 at 16:57














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does this mean that a spell like Warding Bond cannot be twinned either?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Zastoupil
    Feb 27 at 14:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielZastoupil That is correct. Warding bond affects more than one creature and thus would not be applicable for twinning by JC's clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Feb 27 at 15:45












  • $begingroup$
    Though I agree it's a compelling point and certain spells are specifically called out for affecting other creatures in specific ways, even that isn't a clear cut solution. The Jump spell says "You touch a creature". Have I been affected in any way? Well, yes, but actually no. You might say then that it must be a mechanical effect, but then what about Levitate? "You can change the target's altitude by up to 20 feet in either direction on your turn". You are clearly affected in some way by the spell, but I've never seen a case made against twinning either of those spells.
    $endgroup$
    – Mwr247
    Feb 27 at 16:15








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The delivery method of a spell certainly doesn't count as being affected by it. I don't see how controlling a spell you previously cast could possibly constitute being affected by the spell either, but I suppose I can at least see that being a point of discussion. However, that isn't the question at hand; if the spell is dealing damage to you or healing you, there is just no possible way to interpret that as not "affecting" you. You are absolutely a target of your own life transference.
    $endgroup$
    – Darth Pseudonym
    Feb 27 at 16:37








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Some would argue that the damage is part of the delivery method. The challenge isn't that it's not affecting you, but rather that defining "targets" as being "affected in any way" doesn't clear things up as a general solution, because now we need a proper definition of what it means to be affected. Both the examples I gave above do affect the caster as do many other spells, albeit in different ways, but are twinnable. The point I'm trying to make is that while there are perfectly valid arguments to be made for and against Life Transference, I don't think being "affected" clears it up.
    $endgroup$
    – Mwr247
    Feb 27 at 16:57








1




1




$begingroup$
Does this mean that a spell like Warding Bond cannot be twinned either?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Zastoupil
Feb 27 at 14:47




$begingroup$
Does this mean that a spell like Warding Bond cannot be twinned either?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Zastoupil
Feb 27 at 14:47




1




1




$begingroup$
@DanielZastoupil That is correct. Warding bond affects more than one creature and thus would not be applicable for twinning by JC's clarification.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 27 at 15:45






$begingroup$
@DanielZastoupil That is correct. Warding bond affects more than one creature and thus would not be applicable for twinning by JC's clarification.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Feb 27 at 15:45














$begingroup$
Though I agree it's a compelling point and certain spells are specifically called out for affecting other creatures in specific ways, even that isn't a clear cut solution. The Jump spell says "You touch a creature". Have I been affected in any way? Well, yes, but actually no. You might say then that it must be a mechanical effect, but then what about Levitate? "You can change the target's altitude by up to 20 feet in either direction on your turn". You are clearly affected in some way by the spell, but I've never seen a case made against twinning either of those spells.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Feb 27 at 16:15






$begingroup$
Though I agree it's a compelling point and certain spells are specifically called out for affecting other creatures in specific ways, even that isn't a clear cut solution. The Jump spell says "You touch a creature". Have I been affected in any way? Well, yes, but actually no. You might say then that it must be a mechanical effect, but then what about Levitate? "You can change the target's altitude by up to 20 feet in either direction on your turn". You are clearly affected in some way by the spell, but I've never seen a case made against twinning either of those spells.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Feb 27 at 16:15






1




1




$begingroup$
The delivery method of a spell certainly doesn't count as being affected by it. I don't see how controlling a spell you previously cast could possibly constitute being affected by the spell either, but I suppose I can at least see that being a point of discussion. However, that isn't the question at hand; if the spell is dealing damage to you or healing you, there is just no possible way to interpret that as not "affecting" you. You are absolutely a target of your own life transference.
$endgroup$
– Darth Pseudonym
Feb 27 at 16:37






$begingroup$
The delivery method of a spell certainly doesn't count as being affected by it. I don't see how controlling a spell you previously cast could possibly constitute being affected by the spell either, but I suppose I can at least see that being a point of discussion. However, that isn't the question at hand; if the spell is dealing damage to you or healing you, there is just no possible way to interpret that as not "affecting" you. You are absolutely a target of your own life transference.
$endgroup$
– Darth Pseudonym
Feb 27 at 16:37






2




2




$begingroup$
Some would argue that the damage is part of the delivery method. The challenge isn't that it's not affecting you, but rather that defining "targets" as being "affected in any way" doesn't clear things up as a general solution, because now we need a proper definition of what it means to be affected. Both the examples I gave above do affect the caster as do many other spells, albeit in different ways, but are twinnable. The point I'm trying to make is that while there are perfectly valid arguments to be made for and against Life Transference, I don't think being "affected" clears it up.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Feb 27 at 16:57




$begingroup$
Some would argue that the damage is part of the delivery method. The challenge isn't that it's not affecting you, but rather that defining "targets" as being "affected in any way" doesn't clear things up as a general solution, because now we need a proper definition of what it means to be affected. Both the examples I gave above do affect the caster as do many other spells, albeit in different ways, but are twinnable. The point I'm trying to make is that while there are perfectly valid arguments to be made for and against Life Transference, I don't think being "affected" clears it up.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Feb 27 at 16:57


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142042%2fwhat-happens-when-i-twin-life-transference%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Image
0 0 $begingroup$ Need help with this problem. Suppose our lazy professor collects a quiz and a homework assignment from a class of n students one day, then distributes both the quizzes and the homework assignments back to the class in a random fashion for grading. Each student receives one quiz and one homework assignment to grade. (a) What is the probability that every student receives someone else's quiz to grade, and someone else's homework to grade? (b) What is the probability that no student receives both their own quiz and their own homework assignment to grade? In this case, some students may receive their own quiz, and others may receive their own homework assignment. (c) Compute the limiting probability as n approaches infinity in each case. ...
Read more

Aardman Animations

Image
Aardman Animations, Ltd. Aardman Animations Tipo privada Atividade Animação em stop-motion , Animação em CGI Fundação 1972 Fundador(es) Peter Lord David Sproxton Sede Bristol, Inglaterra  Reino Unido Proprietário(s) Dreamworks Pessoas-chave Peter Lord David Sproxton Nick Park Divisões Aardman Features Aardman Digital Aardman Commercials Aardman Broadcast Aardman International Aardman Rights Aardman Effects Aardman 3-D Systems Aardman Nathan Love AardBoiled Website oficial aardman.com ...
Read more

Are they similar matrix

Image
0 $begingroup$ Do $begin{bmatrix} 0&i&0\0&0&1\0&0&0 end{bmatrix} $ and $begin{bmatrix} 0&0&0\-i&0&0\0&1&0 end{bmatrix} $ are similar.Is this True/false Clearly both are nilpotent and one is conjucate transpose of other but how to know if they are similar.i'm stuck. Please help me linear-algebra vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors generalizedeigenvector share | cite | improve this question edited Dec 10 '18 at 6:38 Vasanth Kris asked Dec 10 '18 at 6:19 ...
Read more