Savings Accounts for Future Child Expenses
If I were looking to have a kid in the next 3-6 years, what (if any) tax-advantaged plans exist to help saving for future, related expenses?
To be more specific, there are numerous types of savings plans that offer pre-tax contribution, reduced taxes on growth, or no income tax on disbursements that are affiliated with specific, major lifetime events (such as 529 plans for college, or 401ks/IRAs for retirement). What I have not been able to find are plans that generally allow for future child-rearing expenses, including:
- Hospital visits for pregnancy care
- Formula, diapers, clothing, other consumables
- Daycare
Of these significant, relatively predictable expenses, only the first has any related plans that I know of (specifically HSAs and FSAs), and it isn't limited to having kids. Do any plans specifically for future parents exist to help offset the costs of having a baby?
To be specific, I am not asking about major expenses later on in the child's life (like this question). I am asking about major expenses that the parents will face in the first few years of (and the months leading up to) parenthood.
united-states investing investment-strategies children tax-free-savings
add a comment |
If I were looking to have a kid in the next 3-6 years, what (if any) tax-advantaged plans exist to help saving for future, related expenses?
To be more specific, there are numerous types of savings plans that offer pre-tax contribution, reduced taxes on growth, or no income tax on disbursements that are affiliated with specific, major lifetime events (such as 529 plans for college, or 401ks/IRAs for retirement). What I have not been able to find are plans that generally allow for future child-rearing expenses, including:
- Hospital visits for pregnancy care
- Formula, diapers, clothing, other consumables
- Daycare
Of these significant, relatively predictable expenses, only the first has any related plans that I know of (specifically HSAs and FSAs), and it isn't limited to having kids. Do any plans specifically for future parents exist to help offset the costs of having a baby?
To be specific, I am not asking about major expenses later on in the child's life (like this question). I am asking about major expenses that the parents will face in the first few years of (and the months leading up to) parenthood.
united-states investing investment-strategies children tax-free-savings
Daycares are typically a valid use for a dependent-care FSA. I very much doubt there is anything for #2.
– chepner
Feb 6 at 19:55
1
@chepner dep care FSA can't be pre-funded three years ahead.
– stannius
Feb 12 at 18:30
add a comment |
If I were looking to have a kid in the next 3-6 years, what (if any) tax-advantaged plans exist to help saving for future, related expenses?
To be more specific, there are numerous types of savings plans that offer pre-tax contribution, reduced taxes on growth, or no income tax on disbursements that are affiliated with specific, major lifetime events (such as 529 plans for college, or 401ks/IRAs for retirement). What I have not been able to find are plans that generally allow for future child-rearing expenses, including:
- Hospital visits for pregnancy care
- Formula, diapers, clothing, other consumables
- Daycare
Of these significant, relatively predictable expenses, only the first has any related plans that I know of (specifically HSAs and FSAs), and it isn't limited to having kids. Do any plans specifically for future parents exist to help offset the costs of having a baby?
To be specific, I am not asking about major expenses later on in the child's life (like this question). I am asking about major expenses that the parents will face in the first few years of (and the months leading up to) parenthood.
united-states investing investment-strategies children tax-free-savings
If I were looking to have a kid in the next 3-6 years, what (if any) tax-advantaged plans exist to help saving for future, related expenses?
To be more specific, there are numerous types of savings plans that offer pre-tax contribution, reduced taxes on growth, or no income tax on disbursements that are affiliated with specific, major lifetime events (such as 529 plans for college, or 401ks/IRAs for retirement). What I have not been able to find are plans that generally allow for future child-rearing expenses, including:
- Hospital visits for pregnancy care
- Formula, diapers, clothing, other consumables
- Daycare
Of these significant, relatively predictable expenses, only the first has any related plans that I know of (specifically HSAs and FSAs), and it isn't limited to having kids. Do any plans specifically for future parents exist to help offset the costs of having a baby?
To be specific, I am not asking about major expenses later on in the child's life (like this question). I am asking about major expenses that the parents will face in the first few years of (and the months leading up to) parenthood.
united-states investing investment-strategies children tax-free-savings
united-states investing investment-strategies children tax-free-savings
asked Feb 6 at 17:27
WannabeCoderWannabeCoder
1,0142715
1,0142715
Daycares are typically a valid use for a dependent-care FSA. I very much doubt there is anything for #2.
– chepner
Feb 6 at 19:55
1
@chepner dep care FSA can't be pre-funded three years ahead.
– stannius
Feb 12 at 18:30
add a comment |
Daycares are typically a valid use for a dependent-care FSA. I very much doubt there is anything for #2.
– chepner
Feb 6 at 19:55
1
@chepner dep care FSA can't be pre-funded three years ahead.
– stannius
Feb 12 at 18:30
Daycares are typically a valid use for a dependent-care FSA. I very much doubt there is anything for #2.
– chepner
Feb 6 at 19:55
Daycares are typically a valid use for a dependent-care FSA. I very much doubt there is anything for #2.
– chepner
Feb 6 at 19:55
1
1
@chepner dep care FSA can't be pre-funded three years ahead.
– stannius
Feb 12 at 18:30
@chepner dep care FSA can't be pre-funded three years ahead.
– stannius
Feb 12 at 18:30
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There aren't any.
Of these significant, relatively predictable expenses
I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as either significant or predictable.
Depending on your health insurance a healthy baby birth will cost very little out of pocket. Even with crummy insurance, many children can be birthed for less than $1,000. Often prenatal vitamins are often prescribed so insurance will pay all or part of their cost. This does not happen with most adults with other conditions, but the vitamins have such a positive effect on outcomes, that it is acceptable practice by all involved. If no insurance exists there are many budget friendly ways to birth a baby including midwifes and home delivery.
Then there is the other side of the coin. Costs for unhealthy baby births can go through the roof. This can be applicable to both mom and baby. In one case, of which I am familiar, a healthy baby developed jaundice so severe she had to spend a few days in the NICU. After that she was just fine. Luckily mom and dad had decent healthy insurance and their out of pocket was not much.
In this case I really like Dave Ramsey's advice on this subject. When momma gets pregnant pause some financial goals and save money. When mom and baby are home fine for a couple of weeks use that saved money to whatever financial goal you are then working. If needed having that extra cash helps alleviate some of the stress associated with a loved one being sick.
There is no favorable tax treatment for the birthing of a baby specifically. All of it just falls under any favorable treatment for medical costs.
You are best off saving money in a taxable account with mutual funds that are tax efficient. You want accounts that spin off little capital gains, or bond funds that might pay tax free.
6
"I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as ... significant" Then you're lucky. When my sister had her first kid, some doctor noticed some minor, inconsequential "problem" and whisked the baby off to the NICU, refusing to release him without some completely unnecessary tests that ended up costing around $10,000 to determine that there wasn't any real problem afterall. In any other context, this would be called extortion and possibly even a hostage situation, as she was not free to take her baby and leave without the expensive tests, but apparently hospitals can get away with it!
– Mason Wheeler
Feb 6 at 23:18
add a comment |
If you have the option of a high deductible health plan you might consider using a High deductible plan with a Health Savings Account (HSA) in the years before the first child is born. You can contribute the maximum into the HSA but don't use the money.
You may decide that in the year the child is born to pick a non-high deductible plan, but because the money on the HSA doesn't expire you can then use the money in the HSA even if you don't currently have a qualifying high deductible plan.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "93"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104997%2fsavings-accounts-for-future-child-expenses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There aren't any.
Of these significant, relatively predictable expenses
I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as either significant or predictable.
Depending on your health insurance a healthy baby birth will cost very little out of pocket. Even with crummy insurance, many children can be birthed for less than $1,000. Often prenatal vitamins are often prescribed so insurance will pay all or part of their cost. This does not happen with most adults with other conditions, but the vitamins have such a positive effect on outcomes, that it is acceptable practice by all involved. If no insurance exists there are many budget friendly ways to birth a baby including midwifes and home delivery.
Then there is the other side of the coin. Costs for unhealthy baby births can go through the roof. This can be applicable to both mom and baby. In one case, of which I am familiar, a healthy baby developed jaundice so severe she had to spend a few days in the NICU. After that she was just fine. Luckily mom and dad had decent healthy insurance and their out of pocket was not much.
In this case I really like Dave Ramsey's advice on this subject. When momma gets pregnant pause some financial goals and save money. When mom and baby are home fine for a couple of weeks use that saved money to whatever financial goal you are then working. If needed having that extra cash helps alleviate some of the stress associated with a loved one being sick.
There is no favorable tax treatment for the birthing of a baby specifically. All of it just falls under any favorable treatment for medical costs.
You are best off saving money in a taxable account with mutual funds that are tax efficient. You want accounts that spin off little capital gains, or bond funds that might pay tax free.
6
"I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as ... significant" Then you're lucky. When my sister had her first kid, some doctor noticed some minor, inconsequential "problem" and whisked the baby off to the NICU, refusing to release him without some completely unnecessary tests that ended up costing around $10,000 to determine that there wasn't any real problem afterall. In any other context, this would be called extortion and possibly even a hostage situation, as she was not free to take her baby and leave without the expensive tests, but apparently hospitals can get away with it!
– Mason Wheeler
Feb 6 at 23:18
add a comment |
There aren't any.
Of these significant, relatively predictable expenses
I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as either significant or predictable.
Depending on your health insurance a healthy baby birth will cost very little out of pocket. Even with crummy insurance, many children can be birthed for less than $1,000. Often prenatal vitamins are often prescribed so insurance will pay all or part of their cost. This does not happen with most adults with other conditions, but the vitamins have such a positive effect on outcomes, that it is acceptable practice by all involved. If no insurance exists there are many budget friendly ways to birth a baby including midwifes and home delivery.
Then there is the other side of the coin. Costs for unhealthy baby births can go through the roof. This can be applicable to both mom and baby. In one case, of which I am familiar, a healthy baby developed jaundice so severe she had to spend a few days in the NICU. After that she was just fine. Luckily mom and dad had decent healthy insurance and their out of pocket was not much.
In this case I really like Dave Ramsey's advice on this subject. When momma gets pregnant pause some financial goals and save money. When mom and baby are home fine for a couple of weeks use that saved money to whatever financial goal you are then working. If needed having that extra cash helps alleviate some of the stress associated with a loved one being sick.
There is no favorable tax treatment for the birthing of a baby specifically. All of it just falls under any favorable treatment for medical costs.
You are best off saving money in a taxable account with mutual funds that are tax efficient. You want accounts that spin off little capital gains, or bond funds that might pay tax free.
6
"I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as ... significant" Then you're lucky. When my sister had her first kid, some doctor noticed some minor, inconsequential "problem" and whisked the baby off to the NICU, refusing to release him without some completely unnecessary tests that ended up costing around $10,000 to determine that there wasn't any real problem afterall. In any other context, this would be called extortion and possibly even a hostage situation, as she was not free to take her baby and leave without the expensive tests, but apparently hospitals can get away with it!
– Mason Wheeler
Feb 6 at 23:18
add a comment |
There aren't any.
Of these significant, relatively predictable expenses
I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as either significant or predictable.
Depending on your health insurance a healthy baby birth will cost very little out of pocket. Even with crummy insurance, many children can be birthed for less than $1,000. Often prenatal vitamins are often prescribed so insurance will pay all or part of their cost. This does not happen with most adults with other conditions, but the vitamins have such a positive effect on outcomes, that it is acceptable practice by all involved. If no insurance exists there are many budget friendly ways to birth a baby including midwifes and home delivery.
Then there is the other side of the coin. Costs for unhealthy baby births can go through the roof. This can be applicable to both mom and baby. In one case, of which I am familiar, a healthy baby developed jaundice so severe she had to spend a few days in the NICU. After that she was just fine. Luckily mom and dad had decent healthy insurance and their out of pocket was not much.
In this case I really like Dave Ramsey's advice on this subject. When momma gets pregnant pause some financial goals and save money. When mom and baby are home fine for a couple of weeks use that saved money to whatever financial goal you are then working. If needed having that extra cash helps alleviate some of the stress associated with a loved one being sick.
There is no favorable tax treatment for the birthing of a baby specifically. All of it just falls under any favorable treatment for medical costs.
You are best off saving money in a taxable account with mutual funds that are tax efficient. You want accounts that spin off little capital gains, or bond funds that might pay tax free.
There aren't any.
Of these significant, relatively predictable expenses
I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as either significant or predictable.
Depending on your health insurance a healthy baby birth will cost very little out of pocket. Even with crummy insurance, many children can be birthed for less than $1,000. Often prenatal vitamins are often prescribed so insurance will pay all or part of their cost. This does not happen with most adults with other conditions, but the vitamins have such a positive effect on outcomes, that it is acceptable practice by all involved. If no insurance exists there are many budget friendly ways to birth a baby including midwifes and home delivery.
Then there is the other side of the coin. Costs for unhealthy baby births can go through the roof. This can be applicable to both mom and baby. In one case, of which I am familiar, a healthy baby developed jaundice so severe she had to spend a few days in the NICU. After that she was just fine. Luckily mom and dad had decent healthy insurance and their out of pocket was not much.
In this case I really like Dave Ramsey's advice on this subject. When momma gets pregnant pause some financial goals and save money. When mom and baby are home fine for a couple of weeks use that saved money to whatever financial goal you are then working. If needed having that extra cash helps alleviate some of the stress associated with a loved one being sick.
There is no favorable tax treatment for the birthing of a baby specifically. All of it just falls under any favorable treatment for medical costs.
You are best off saving money in a taxable account with mutual funds that are tax efficient. You want accounts that spin off little capital gains, or bond funds that might pay tax free.
answered Feb 6 at 17:54
Pete B.Pete B.
51.7k12110163
51.7k12110163
6
"I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as ... significant" Then you're lucky. When my sister had her first kid, some doctor noticed some minor, inconsequential "problem" and whisked the baby off to the NICU, refusing to release him without some completely unnecessary tests that ended up costing around $10,000 to determine that there wasn't any real problem afterall. In any other context, this would be called extortion and possibly even a hostage situation, as she was not free to take her baby and leave without the expensive tests, but apparently hospitals can get away with it!
– Mason Wheeler
Feb 6 at 23:18
add a comment |
6
"I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as ... significant" Then you're lucky. When my sister had her first kid, some doctor noticed some minor, inconsequential "problem" and whisked the baby off to the NICU, refusing to release him without some completely unnecessary tests that ended up costing around $10,000 to determine that there wasn't any real problem afterall. In any other context, this would be called extortion and possibly even a hostage situation, as she was not free to take her baby and leave without the expensive tests, but apparently hospitals can get away with it!
– Mason Wheeler
Feb 6 at 23:18
6
6
"I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as ... significant" Then you're lucky. When my sister had her first kid, some doctor noticed some minor, inconsequential "problem" and whisked the baby off to the NICU, refusing to release him without some completely unnecessary tests that ended up costing around $10,000 to determine that there wasn't any real problem afterall. In any other context, this would be called extortion and possibly even a hostage situation, as she was not free to take her baby and leave without the expensive tests, but apparently hospitals can get away with it!
– Mason Wheeler
Feb 6 at 23:18
"I would not necessarily classify child birth cost as ... significant" Then you're lucky. When my sister had her first kid, some doctor noticed some minor, inconsequential "problem" and whisked the baby off to the NICU, refusing to release him without some completely unnecessary tests that ended up costing around $10,000 to determine that there wasn't any real problem afterall. In any other context, this would be called extortion and possibly even a hostage situation, as she was not free to take her baby and leave without the expensive tests, but apparently hospitals can get away with it!
– Mason Wheeler
Feb 6 at 23:18
add a comment |
If you have the option of a high deductible health plan you might consider using a High deductible plan with a Health Savings Account (HSA) in the years before the first child is born. You can contribute the maximum into the HSA but don't use the money.
You may decide that in the year the child is born to pick a non-high deductible plan, but because the money on the HSA doesn't expire you can then use the money in the HSA even if you don't currently have a qualifying high deductible plan.
add a comment |
If you have the option of a high deductible health plan you might consider using a High deductible plan with a Health Savings Account (HSA) in the years before the first child is born. You can contribute the maximum into the HSA but don't use the money.
You may decide that in the year the child is born to pick a non-high deductible plan, but because the money on the HSA doesn't expire you can then use the money in the HSA even if you don't currently have a qualifying high deductible plan.
add a comment |
If you have the option of a high deductible health plan you might consider using a High deductible plan with a Health Savings Account (HSA) in the years before the first child is born. You can contribute the maximum into the HSA but don't use the money.
You may decide that in the year the child is born to pick a non-high deductible plan, but because the money on the HSA doesn't expire you can then use the money in the HSA even if you don't currently have a qualifying high deductible plan.
If you have the option of a high deductible health plan you might consider using a High deductible plan with a Health Savings Account (HSA) in the years before the first child is born. You can contribute the maximum into the HSA but don't use the money.
You may decide that in the year the child is born to pick a non-high deductible plan, but because the money on the HSA doesn't expire you can then use the money in the HSA even if you don't currently have a qualifying high deductible plan.
answered Feb 6 at 17:54
mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep
68.7k895173
68.7k895173
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104997%2fsavings-accounts-for-future-child-expenses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Daycares are typically a valid use for a dependent-care FSA. I very much doubt there is anything for #2.
– chepner
Feb 6 at 19:55
1
@chepner dep care FSA can't be pre-funded three years ahead.
– stannius
Feb 12 at 18:30