Question about an inequation described by matrices.












1












$begingroup$


$A=(a_{ij})_{1 le i, j le n}$ is a matrix that$sum_limits{i=1}^{n} a_{ij}=1$ for every j and $sum_limits{j=1}^n a_{ij} = 1$ for every i and $a_{ij} ge 0$.And
$$begin{equation}
begin{pmatrix}
y_1 \
vdots \
y_n \
end{pmatrix}
=mathbf{A}
begin{pmatrix}
x_1 \
vdots \
x_n
end{pmatrix}
end{equation}$$
$y_i$ and $x_i$ are all nonnegative.Prove that : $y_1 cdots y_n ge x_1 cdots x_n$



It may somehow matter to convex function.






analysis inequality convex-analysis







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    can you write out the inequality fully? That is, replace each $y_i$ with its expression in terms of the $x_i$'s
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:08










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 i have written it out fully but it doesn't help. Or you means to edit the question to make it more clear.
    $endgroup$
    – X.T Chen
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:12










  • $begingroup$
    just write it out fully in the question. i don't have paper on me
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:13












  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 $ prod_limits{i=1}^{n} (sum_limits{j=1}^{n} a_{ij}x_j) = prod_limits{j=1}^{n} x_j $
    $endgroup$
    – X.T Chen
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:39












  • $begingroup$
    ok, so the LHS has the terms $(prod_{j=1}^n a_{f(j)j})prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, for any $f: {1,dots,n} to {1,dots,n}$. Now just add all of these terms up. You should get $prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, right?
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:49
















1












$begingroup$


$A=(a_{ij})_{1 le i, j le n}$ is a matrix that$sum_limits{i=1}^{n} a_{ij}=1$ for every j and $sum_limits{j=1}^n a_{ij} = 1$ for every i and $a_{ij} ge 0$.And
$$begin{equation}
begin{pmatrix}
y_1 \
vdots \
y_n \
end{pmatrix}
=mathbf{A}
begin{pmatrix}
x_1 \
vdots \
x_n
end{pmatrix}
end{equation}$$
$y_i$ and $x_i$ are all nonnegative.Prove that : $y_1 cdots y_n ge x_1 cdots x_n$



It may somehow matter to convex function.






analysis inequality convex-analysis







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    can you write out the inequality fully? That is, replace each $y_i$ with its expression in terms of the $x_i$'s
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:08










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 i have written it out fully but it doesn't help. Or you means to edit the question to make it more clear.
    $endgroup$
    – X.T Chen
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:12










  • $begingroup$
    just write it out fully in the question. i don't have paper on me
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:13












  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 $ prod_limits{i=1}^{n} (sum_limits{j=1}^{n} a_{ij}x_j) = prod_limits{j=1}^{n} x_j $
    $endgroup$
    – X.T Chen
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:39












  • $begingroup$
    ok, so the LHS has the terms $(prod_{j=1}^n a_{f(j)j})prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, for any $f: {1,dots,n} to {1,dots,n}$. Now just add all of these terms up. You should get $prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, right?
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:49














1












1








1





$begingroup$


$A=(a_{ij})_{1 le i, j le n}$ is a matrix that$sum_limits{i=1}^{n} a_{ij}=1$ for every j and $sum_limits{j=1}^n a_{ij} = 1$ for every i and $a_{ij} ge 0$.And
$$begin{equation}
begin{pmatrix}
y_1 \
vdots \
y_n \
end{pmatrix}
=mathbf{A}
begin{pmatrix}
x_1 \
vdots \
x_n
end{pmatrix}
end{equation}$$
$y_i$ and $x_i$ are all nonnegative.Prove that : $y_1 cdots y_n ge x_1 cdots x_n$



It may somehow matter to convex function.






analysis inequality convex-analysis







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




$A=(a_{ij})_{1 le i, j le n}$ is a matrix that$sum_limits{i=1}^{n} a_{ij}=1$ for every j and $sum_limits{j=1}^n a_{ij} = 1$ for every i and $a_{ij} ge 0$.And
$$begin{equation}
begin{pmatrix}
y_1 \
vdots \
y_n \
end{pmatrix}
=mathbf{A}
begin{pmatrix}
x_1 \
vdots \
x_n
end{pmatrix}
end{equation}$$
$y_i$ and $x_i$ are all nonnegative.Prove that : $y_1 cdots y_n ge x_1 cdots x_n$



It may somehow matter to convex function.






analysis inequality convex-analysis




analysis inequality convex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 25 '18 at 8:57









X.T ChenX.T Chen

988




988












  • $begingroup$
    can you write out the inequality fully? That is, replace each $y_i$ with its expression in terms of the $x_i$'s
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:08










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 i have written it out fully but it doesn't help. Or you means to edit the question to make it more clear.
    $endgroup$
    – X.T Chen
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:12










  • $begingroup$
    just write it out fully in the question. i don't have paper on me
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:13












  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 $ prod_limits{i=1}^{n} (sum_limits{j=1}^{n} a_{ij}x_j) = prod_limits{j=1}^{n} x_j $
    $endgroup$
    – X.T Chen
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:39












  • $begingroup$
    ok, so the LHS has the terms $(prod_{j=1}^n a_{f(j)j})prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, for any $f: {1,dots,n} to {1,dots,n}$. Now just add all of these terms up. You should get $prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, right?
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:49


















  • $begingroup$
    can you write out the inequality fully? That is, replace each $y_i$ with its expression in terms of the $x_i$'s
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:08










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 i have written it out fully but it doesn't help. Or you means to edit the question to make it more clear.
    $endgroup$
    – X.T Chen
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:12










  • $begingroup$
    just write it out fully in the question. i don't have paper on me
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:13












  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 $ prod_limits{i=1}^{n} (sum_limits{j=1}^{n} a_{ij}x_j) = prod_limits{j=1}^{n} x_j $
    $endgroup$
    – X.T Chen
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:39












  • $begingroup$
    ok, so the LHS has the terms $(prod_{j=1}^n a_{f(j)j})prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, for any $f: {1,dots,n} to {1,dots,n}$. Now just add all of these terms up. You should get $prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, right?
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 25 '18 at 9:49
















$begingroup$
can you write out the inequality fully? That is, replace each $y_i$ with its expression in terms of the $x_i$'s
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 25 '18 at 9:08




$begingroup$
can you write out the inequality fully? That is, replace each $y_i$ with its expression in terms of the $x_i$'s
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 25 '18 at 9:08












$begingroup$
@mathworker21 i have written it out fully but it doesn't help. Or you means to edit the question to make it more clear.
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 25 '18 at 9:12




$begingroup$
@mathworker21 i have written it out fully but it doesn't help. Or you means to edit the question to make it more clear.
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 25 '18 at 9:12












$begingroup$
just write it out fully in the question. i don't have paper on me
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 25 '18 at 9:13






$begingroup$
just write it out fully in the question. i don't have paper on me
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 25 '18 at 9:13














$begingroup$
@mathworker21 $ prod_limits{i=1}^{n} (sum_limits{j=1}^{n} a_{ij}x_j) = prod_limits{j=1}^{n} x_j $
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 25 '18 at 9:39






$begingroup$
@mathworker21 $ prod_limits{i=1}^{n} (sum_limits{j=1}^{n} a_{ij}x_j) = prod_limits{j=1}^{n} x_j $
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 25 '18 at 9:39














$begingroup$
ok, so the LHS has the terms $(prod_{j=1}^n a_{f(j)j})prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, for any $f: {1,dots,n} to {1,dots,n}$. Now just add all of these terms up. You should get $prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, right?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 25 '18 at 9:49




$begingroup$
ok, so the LHS has the terms $(prod_{j=1}^n a_{f(j)j})prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, for any $f: {1,dots,n} to {1,dots,n}$. Now just add all of these terms up. You should get $prod_{j=1}^n x_j$, right?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 25 '18 at 9:49










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Hint:

If any $y_i$ is zero, from the condition on $a_{ij}$, at least one $x_k$ must be zero, so we may consider only positive $x_i,y_j$. Also the doubly stochastic matrix represents the majorization $x succ y$, so by Karamata’s Inequality, with the concave $log$ function, $sum log y_i geqslant sum log x_i$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    -1












    $begingroup$

    Clue: the right hand side of the given equation is a linear combination of the columns of $A$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I've already known that. Could you be more clear?
      $endgroup$
      – X.T Chen
      Dec 25 '18 at 9:43











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051950%2fquestion-about-an-inequation-described-by-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Hint:

    If any $y_i$ is zero, from the condition on $a_{ij}$, at least one $x_k$ must be zero, so we may consider only positive $x_i,y_j$. Also the doubly stochastic matrix represents the majorization $x succ y$, so by Karamata’s Inequality, with the concave $log$ function, $sum log y_i geqslant sum log x_i$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Hint:

      If any $y_i$ is zero, from the condition on $a_{ij}$, at least one $x_k$ must be zero, so we may consider only positive $x_i,y_j$. Also the doubly stochastic matrix represents the majorization $x succ y$, so by Karamata’s Inequality, with the concave $log$ function, $sum log y_i geqslant sum log x_i$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Hint:

        If any $y_i$ is zero, from the condition on $a_{ij}$, at least one $x_k$ must be zero, so we may consider only positive $x_i,y_j$. Also the doubly stochastic matrix represents the majorization $x succ y$, so by Karamata’s Inequality, with the concave $log$ function, $sum log y_i geqslant sum log x_i$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Hint:

        If any $y_i$ is zero, from the condition on $a_{ij}$, at least one $x_k$ must be zero, so we may consider only positive $x_i,y_j$. Also the doubly stochastic matrix represents the majorization $x succ y$, so by Karamata’s Inequality, with the concave $log$ function, $sum log y_i geqslant sum log x_i$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 25 '18 at 15:04









        MacavityMacavity

        35.6k52554




        35.6k52554























            -1












            $begingroup$

            Clue: the right hand side of the given equation is a linear combination of the columns of $A$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I've already known that. Could you be more clear?
              $endgroup$
              – X.T Chen
              Dec 25 '18 at 9:43
















            -1












            $begingroup$

            Clue: the right hand side of the given equation is a linear combination of the columns of $A$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I've already known that. Could you be more clear?
              $endgroup$
              – X.T Chen
              Dec 25 '18 at 9:43














            -1












            -1








            -1





            $begingroup$

            Clue: the right hand side of the given equation is a linear combination of the columns of $A$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Clue: the right hand side of the given equation is a linear combination of the columns of $A$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 25 '18 at 9:31









            John MitchellJohn Mitchell

            377210




            377210












            • $begingroup$
              I've already known that. Could you be more clear?
              $endgroup$
              – X.T Chen
              Dec 25 '18 at 9:43


















            • $begingroup$
              I've already known that. Could you be more clear?
              $endgroup$
              – X.T Chen
              Dec 25 '18 at 9:43
















            $begingroup$
            I've already known that. Could you be more clear?
            $endgroup$
            – X.T Chen
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:43




            $begingroup$
            I've already known that. Could you be more clear?
            $endgroup$
            – X.T Chen
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:43


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051950%2fquestion-about-an-inequation-described-by-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

            Image
            up vote 4 down vote favorite 1 Some time ago, I set up skydrive for my wife on her mac. But now she wants to access the files online, I cannot remember what Microsoft account I setup and linked her skydive app to and nor can I see anything in the skydrive app settings to tell me either? How can I see the name of the Microsoft account the skydive app is currently linked to? I would like to know this for skydrive app for Mac and PC onedrive share | improve this question asked Feb 25 '13 at 4:52 Gary Barrett 260 2 5 12
            Read more

            When does type information flow backwards in C++?

            Image
            up vote 62 down vote favorite 19 I just watched Stephan T. Lavavej talk at CppCon 2018 on "Class Template Argument Deduction", where at some point he incidentally says: In C++ type information almost never flows backwards ... I had to say "almost" because there's one or two cases, possibly more but very few . Despite trying to figure out which cases he might be referring to, I couldn't come up with anything. Hence the question: In which cases the C++17 standard mandates that type information propagate backwards? c++ language-lawyer c++17 share | improve this question edited 7 hours ago scohe0
            Read more

            Grease: Live!

            Image
            A tradução deste artigo está abaixo da qualidade média aceitável. É possível que tenha sido feita por um tradutor automático ou por alguém que não conhece bem o português ou a língua original do texto. Caso queira colaborar com a Wikipédia, tente encontrar a página original e melhore este verbete conforme o guia de tradução. Grease: Live! Grease: Live!  (PRT/BRA)  Estados Unidos 2016 •   cor •   130 min. min   Direção Thomas Kail Alex Rudzinski Produção Marc Platt Adam Siegel Roteiro Allan Carr Robert Cary Warren Casey Jim Jacobs Jonathan Tolins Bronte Woodard Baseado em Grease (musical) Grease (filme) Elenco Julianne Hough Aaron Tveit Vanessa Hudgens Carlos Pena Jr. Keke Palmer Carly Rae Jepsen Kether Donohue Jordan Fisher David Del Rio Andrew Call Gênero Musical Música Tom Kitt Figurino William Ivey Long Companhia(s) produtora(s) Warner Bros. Studios Distribuição Fox Lançamento 31 de Janei
            Read more