Given that $G/H={xH:x in G}$ is group under operation $(xH)(yH)=(xyH)$ . Then $H$ is normal subgroup of $G$












2












$begingroup$


let $G$ is any group and $H$ is its subgroup , such that $G/H={xH:x in G}$ is group under operation $(xH)(yH)=(xyH)$ . Then show that $H$ is normal subgroup of $G$



if $H$ is not normal ,then there exist some $xin G$ such that $xH neq Hx$, clearly $xnotin H$ now how can i get a contradiction . I know then operation on $G/H$ is not well defined. but how to prove that ?



any hint. Thanks in advanced










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    let $G$ is any group and $H$ is its subgroup , such that $G/H={xH:x in G}$ is group under operation $(xH)(yH)=(xyH)$ . Then show that $H$ is normal subgroup of $G$



    if $H$ is not normal ,then there exist some $xin G$ such that $xH neq Hx$, clearly $xnotin H$ now how can i get a contradiction . I know then operation on $G/H$ is not well defined. but how to prove that ?



    any hint. Thanks in advanced










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      let $G$ is any group and $H$ is its subgroup , such that $G/H={xH:x in G}$ is group under operation $(xH)(yH)=(xyH)$ . Then show that $H$ is normal subgroup of $G$



      if $H$ is not normal ,then there exist some $xin G$ such that $xH neq Hx$, clearly $xnotin H$ now how can i get a contradiction . I know then operation on $G/H$ is not well defined. but how to prove that ?



      any hint. Thanks in advanced










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      let $G$ is any group and $H$ is its subgroup , such that $G/H={xH:x in G}$ is group under operation $(xH)(yH)=(xyH)$ . Then show that $H$ is normal subgroup of $G$



      if $H$ is not normal ,then there exist some $xin G$ such that $xH neq Hx$, clearly $xnotin H$ now how can i get a contradiction . I know then operation on $G/H$ is not well defined. but how to prove that ?



      any hint. Thanks in advanced







      abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups normal-subgroups quotient-group






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 29 '18 at 14:58







      Eklavya

















      asked Dec 29 '18 at 14:49









      EklavyaEklavya

      982515




      982515






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          We clearly have $xhH=xH$ for $xin G, hin H$. Then, by being well defined, we arrive to
          $$(xhx^{-1})H=xhHcdot x^{-1}H=xHcdot x^{-1}H=(xx^{-1})H=eH=H$$
          Thus, $xhx^{-1}in H$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            The set $G/H$ is well-defined even if $H$ is not normal, because we can just define $G/H$ as the set of all left cosets on $H$. The problem is with the fact that, if $H$ is not normal, this set does not satisfy the group axioms under the operation $(xH)(yH)=(xy)H$. Now, there is probably a way to do this through a proof by contradiction using the group axioms, like you are trying to do. However, I feel like it might be easier to do a more indirect proof using homomorphisms.



            Let's assume $G/H$ is a group under the operation $(xH)(yH)=(xy)H$. Then, let us define the homomorphism $phi : G rightarrow G/H$ by $phi(g)=gH$. This is a homomorphism because:



            $$phi(gH)phi(g_2H)=(gH)(g_2)H=(gg_2)H=phi(gg_2)$$



            Now, what is the kernel of this homomorphism? Well, the identity in $G/H$ is $H$, so we need to solve $phi(g)=gH=H$. This happens if and only if $g in H$, so the kernel of $phi$ is $H$. However, the kernel of any homomorphism is a normal subgroup of the domain, so $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055913%2fgiven-that-g-h-xhx-in-g-is-group-under-operation-xhyh-xyh-then%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3












              $begingroup$

              We clearly have $xhH=xH$ for $xin G, hin H$. Then, by being well defined, we arrive to
              $$(xhx^{-1})H=xhHcdot x^{-1}H=xHcdot x^{-1}H=(xx^{-1})H=eH=H$$
              Thus, $xhx^{-1}in H$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                We clearly have $xhH=xH$ for $xin G, hin H$. Then, by being well defined, we arrive to
                $$(xhx^{-1})H=xhHcdot x^{-1}H=xHcdot x^{-1}H=(xx^{-1})H=eH=H$$
                Thus, $xhx^{-1}in H$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  We clearly have $xhH=xH$ for $xin G, hin H$. Then, by being well defined, we arrive to
                  $$(xhx^{-1})H=xhHcdot x^{-1}H=xHcdot x^{-1}H=(xx^{-1})H=eH=H$$
                  Thus, $xhx^{-1}in H$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  We clearly have $xhH=xH$ for $xin G, hin H$. Then, by being well defined, we arrive to
                  $$(xhx^{-1})H=xhHcdot x^{-1}H=xHcdot x^{-1}H=(xx^{-1})H=eH=H$$
                  Thus, $xhx^{-1}in H$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 29 '18 at 15:03









                  BerciBerci

                  61.6k23674




                  61.6k23674























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      The set $G/H$ is well-defined even if $H$ is not normal, because we can just define $G/H$ as the set of all left cosets on $H$. The problem is with the fact that, if $H$ is not normal, this set does not satisfy the group axioms under the operation $(xH)(yH)=(xy)H$. Now, there is probably a way to do this through a proof by contradiction using the group axioms, like you are trying to do. However, I feel like it might be easier to do a more indirect proof using homomorphisms.



                      Let's assume $G/H$ is a group under the operation $(xH)(yH)=(xy)H$. Then, let us define the homomorphism $phi : G rightarrow G/H$ by $phi(g)=gH$. This is a homomorphism because:



                      $$phi(gH)phi(g_2H)=(gH)(g_2)H=(gg_2)H=phi(gg_2)$$



                      Now, what is the kernel of this homomorphism? Well, the identity in $G/H$ is $H$, so we need to solve $phi(g)=gH=H$. This happens if and only if $g in H$, so the kernel of $phi$ is $H$. However, the kernel of any homomorphism is a normal subgroup of the domain, so $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        The set $G/H$ is well-defined even if $H$ is not normal, because we can just define $G/H$ as the set of all left cosets on $H$. The problem is with the fact that, if $H$ is not normal, this set does not satisfy the group axioms under the operation $(xH)(yH)=(xy)H$. Now, there is probably a way to do this through a proof by contradiction using the group axioms, like you are trying to do. However, I feel like it might be easier to do a more indirect proof using homomorphisms.



                        Let's assume $G/H$ is a group under the operation $(xH)(yH)=(xy)H$. Then, let us define the homomorphism $phi : G rightarrow G/H$ by $phi(g)=gH$. This is a homomorphism because:



                        $$phi(gH)phi(g_2H)=(gH)(g_2)H=(gg_2)H=phi(gg_2)$$



                        Now, what is the kernel of this homomorphism? Well, the identity in $G/H$ is $H$, so we need to solve $phi(g)=gH=H$. This happens if and only if $g in H$, so the kernel of $phi$ is $H$. However, the kernel of any homomorphism is a normal subgroup of the domain, so $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          The set $G/H$ is well-defined even if $H$ is not normal, because we can just define $G/H$ as the set of all left cosets on $H$. The problem is with the fact that, if $H$ is not normal, this set does not satisfy the group axioms under the operation $(xH)(yH)=(xy)H$. Now, there is probably a way to do this through a proof by contradiction using the group axioms, like you are trying to do. However, I feel like it might be easier to do a more indirect proof using homomorphisms.



                          Let's assume $G/H$ is a group under the operation $(xH)(yH)=(xy)H$. Then, let us define the homomorphism $phi : G rightarrow G/H$ by $phi(g)=gH$. This is a homomorphism because:



                          $$phi(gH)phi(g_2H)=(gH)(g_2)H=(gg_2)H=phi(gg_2)$$



                          Now, what is the kernel of this homomorphism? Well, the identity in $G/H$ is $H$, so we need to solve $phi(g)=gH=H$. This happens if and only if $g in H$, so the kernel of $phi$ is $H$. However, the kernel of any homomorphism is a normal subgroup of the domain, so $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          The set $G/H$ is well-defined even if $H$ is not normal, because we can just define $G/H$ as the set of all left cosets on $H$. The problem is with the fact that, if $H$ is not normal, this set does not satisfy the group axioms under the operation $(xH)(yH)=(xy)H$. Now, there is probably a way to do this through a proof by contradiction using the group axioms, like you are trying to do. However, I feel like it might be easier to do a more indirect proof using homomorphisms.



                          Let's assume $G/H$ is a group under the operation $(xH)(yH)=(xy)H$. Then, let us define the homomorphism $phi : G rightarrow G/H$ by $phi(g)=gH$. This is a homomorphism because:



                          $$phi(gH)phi(g_2H)=(gH)(g_2)H=(gg_2)H=phi(gg_2)$$



                          Now, what is the kernel of this homomorphism? Well, the identity in $G/H$ is $H$, so we need to solve $phi(g)=gH=H$. This happens if and only if $g in H$, so the kernel of $phi$ is $H$. However, the kernel of any homomorphism is a normal subgroup of the domain, so $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 29 '18 at 15:02









                          Noble MushtakNoble Mushtak

                          15.3k1835




                          15.3k1835






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055913%2fgiven-that-g-h-xhx-in-g-is-group-under-operation-xhyh-xyh-then%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Index of /

                              Tribalistas

                              Listed building