Urdhva Pundra for follower of Advaita Philosophy












3















Can a follower of Advaita Philosophy wear the Urdhva Pundra of Gopi Chandana? If so, what is procedure to be followed to wear it?










share|improve this question



























    3















    Can a follower of Advaita Philosophy wear the Urdhva Pundra of Gopi Chandana? If so, what is procedure to be followed to wear it?










    share|improve this question

























      3












      3








      3








      Can a follower of Advaita Philosophy wear the Urdhva Pundra of Gopi Chandana? If so, what is procedure to be followed to wear it?










      share|improve this question














      Can a follower of Advaita Philosophy wear the Urdhva Pundra of Gopi Chandana? If so, what is procedure to be followed to wear it?







      advaita






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 27 at 3:29









      Santosh HegdeSantosh Hegde

      182




      182






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Yes, you can wear urdhavpundram if you belong to advaita line. It has strong traditional evidence for it.



          If you can do a bit of light reading, look at this link. This is from the interview/discussion recorded between a Japanese professor and the late pontiff of Kanchi mutt, H.H Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati.




          There were Vaishnavites who would not even enter a Siva temple –
          teevra vaishnavas – but who were yet followers of Advaita philosophy.
          They will not touch bhasma (sacred ashes) and will put on their
          forehead and body only the vertical marks, proclaiming their devotion
          to Vishnu.




          It goes without saying that that those were what we know as Smartha Vaishnavas. However, personally, I haven't seen any advaitin who refuses to enter other temples.



          What I describe next is personal experience. I am from a tamil speaking smartha family with roots in Kerala. And for as long as I have known, my family and my ancestors even in extended families all have donned only the urdhvapundram using gopi chandanam, in long "U", with a finger's gap, stretching from between the eyebrows to the hairline or beyond. Or a truncated "U", like a an elongated crescent.



          There are many clans which still follow that tradition of wearing urdhvapundram. However, the history and tradition has been so corrupted that I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by a kanchi mutt follower, who at that moment clearly showed that he was ignorant of his own acharya's teachings and his traditions. The topic has lot more details, and associated controversies, all of which are out of scope for this question.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            "I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by an ignorant kanchi mutt follower" - it would be good to remove the name-calling.

            – S K
            Jan 27 at 14:33






          • 2





            @S K ok... Like how? That person was a kanchi mutt follower, who was ignorant of traditions acknowledged by his own acharya. Words aren't attacks. I am merely stating the fact.

            – Ambi
            Jan 27 at 14:35











          • You can add this to your answer: i.stack.imgur.com/e2kAQ.jpg

            – Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
            Feb 15 at 7:58





















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          Yes, you can wear urdhavpundram if you belong to advaita line. It has strong traditional evidence for it.



          If you can do a bit of light reading, look at this link. This is from the interview/discussion recorded between a Japanese professor and the late pontiff of Kanchi mutt, H.H Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati.




          There were Vaishnavites who would not even enter a Siva temple –
          teevra vaishnavas – but who were yet followers of Advaita philosophy.
          They will not touch bhasma (sacred ashes) and will put on their
          forehead and body only the vertical marks, proclaiming their devotion
          to Vishnu.




          It goes without saying that that those were what we know as Smartha Vaishnavas. However, personally, I haven't seen any advaitin who refuses to enter other temples.



          What I describe next is personal experience. I am from a tamil speaking smartha family with roots in Kerala. And for as long as I have known, my family and my ancestors even in extended families all have donned only the urdhvapundram using gopi chandanam, in long "U", with a finger's gap, stretching from between the eyebrows to the hairline or beyond. Or a truncated "U", like a an elongated crescent.



          There are many clans which still follow that tradition of wearing urdhvapundram. However, the history and tradition has been so corrupted that I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by a kanchi mutt follower, who at that moment clearly showed that he was ignorant of his own acharya's teachings and his traditions. The topic has lot more details, and associated controversies, all of which are out of scope for this question.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            "I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by an ignorant kanchi mutt follower" - it would be good to remove the name-calling.

            – S K
            Jan 27 at 14:33






          • 2





            @S K ok... Like how? That person was a kanchi mutt follower, who was ignorant of traditions acknowledged by his own acharya. Words aren't attacks. I am merely stating the fact.

            – Ambi
            Jan 27 at 14:35











          • You can add this to your answer: i.stack.imgur.com/e2kAQ.jpg

            – Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
            Feb 15 at 7:58


















          4














          Yes, you can wear urdhavpundram if you belong to advaita line. It has strong traditional evidence for it.



          If you can do a bit of light reading, look at this link. This is from the interview/discussion recorded between a Japanese professor and the late pontiff of Kanchi mutt, H.H Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati.




          There were Vaishnavites who would not even enter a Siva temple –
          teevra vaishnavas – but who were yet followers of Advaita philosophy.
          They will not touch bhasma (sacred ashes) and will put on their
          forehead and body only the vertical marks, proclaiming their devotion
          to Vishnu.




          It goes without saying that that those were what we know as Smartha Vaishnavas. However, personally, I haven't seen any advaitin who refuses to enter other temples.



          What I describe next is personal experience. I am from a tamil speaking smartha family with roots in Kerala. And for as long as I have known, my family and my ancestors even in extended families all have donned only the urdhvapundram using gopi chandanam, in long "U", with a finger's gap, stretching from between the eyebrows to the hairline or beyond. Or a truncated "U", like a an elongated crescent.



          There are many clans which still follow that tradition of wearing urdhvapundram. However, the history and tradition has been so corrupted that I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by a kanchi mutt follower, who at that moment clearly showed that he was ignorant of his own acharya's teachings and his traditions. The topic has lot more details, and associated controversies, all of which are out of scope for this question.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            "I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by an ignorant kanchi mutt follower" - it would be good to remove the name-calling.

            – S K
            Jan 27 at 14:33






          • 2





            @S K ok... Like how? That person was a kanchi mutt follower, who was ignorant of traditions acknowledged by his own acharya. Words aren't attacks. I am merely stating the fact.

            – Ambi
            Jan 27 at 14:35











          • You can add this to your answer: i.stack.imgur.com/e2kAQ.jpg

            – Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
            Feb 15 at 7:58
















          4












          4








          4







          Yes, you can wear urdhavpundram if you belong to advaita line. It has strong traditional evidence for it.



          If you can do a bit of light reading, look at this link. This is from the interview/discussion recorded between a Japanese professor and the late pontiff of Kanchi mutt, H.H Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati.




          There were Vaishnavites who would not even enter a Siva temple –
          teevra vaishnavas – but who were yet followers of Advaita philosophy.
          They will not touch bhasma (sacred ashes) and will put on their
          forehead and body only the vertical marks, proclaiming their devotion
          to Vishnu.




          It goes without saying that that those were what we know as Smartha Vaishnavas. However, personally, I haven't seen any advaitin who refuses to enter other temples.



          What I describe next is personal experience. I am from a tamil speaking smartha family with roots in Kerala. And for as long as I have known, my family and my ancestors even in extended families all have donned only the urdhvapundram using gopi chandanam, in long "U", with a finger's gap, stretching from between the eyebrows to the hairline or beyond. Or a truncated "U", like a an elongated crescent.



          There are many clans which still follow that tradition of wearing urdhvapundram. However, the history and tradition has been so corrupted that I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by a kanchi mutt follower, who at that moment clearly showed that he was ignorant of his own acharya's teachings and his traditions. The topic has lot more details, and associated controversies, all of which are out of scope for this question.






          share|improve this answer















          Yes, you can wear urdhavpundram if you belong to advaita line. It has strong traditional evidence for it.



          If you can do a bit of light reading, look at this link. This is from the interview/discussion recorded between a Japanese professor and the late pontiff of Kanchi mutt, H.H Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati.




          There were Vaishnavites who would not even enter a Siva temple –
          teevra vaishnavas – but who were yet followers of Advaita philosophy.
          They will not touch bhasma (sacred ashes) and will put on their
          forehead and body only the vertical marks, proclaiming their devotion
          to Vishnu.




          It goes without saying that that those were what we know as Smartha Vaishnavas. However, personally, I haven't seen any advaitin who refuses to enter other temples.



          What I describe next is personal experience. I am from a tamil speaking smartha family with roots in Kerala. And for as long as I have known, my family and my ancestors even in extended families all have donned only the urdhvapundram using gopi chandanam, in long "U", with a finger's gap, stretching from between the eyebrows to the hairline or beyond. Or a truncated "U", like a an elongated crescent.



          There are many clans which still follow that tradition of wearing urdhvapundram. However, the history and tradition has been so corrupted that I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by a kanchi mutt follower, who at that moment clearly showed that he was ignorant of his own acharya's teachings and his traditions. The topic has lot more details, and associated controversies, all of which are out of scope for this question.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 28 at 1:41

























          answered Jan 27 at 6:23









          AmbiAmbi

          1,339121




          1,339121








          • 1





            "I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by an ignorant kanchi mutt follower" - it would be good to remove the name-calling.

            – S K
            Jan 27 at 14:33






          • 2





            @S K ok... Like how? That person was a kanchi mutt follower, who was ignorant of traditions acknowledged by his own acharya. Words aren't attacks. I am merely stating the fact.

            – Ambi
            Jan 27 at 14:35











          • You can add this to your answer: i.stack.imgur.com/e2kAQ.jpg

            – Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
            Feb 15 at 7:58
















          • 1





            "I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by an ignorant kanchi mutt follower" - it would be good to remove the name-calling.

            – S K
            Jan 27 at 14:33






          • 2





            @S K ok... Like how? That person was a kanchi mutt follower, who was ignorant of traditions acknowledged by his own acharya. Words aren't attacks. I am merely stating the fact.

            – Ambi
            Jan 27 at 14:35











          • You can add this to your answer: i.stack.imgur.com/e2kAQ.jpg

            – Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
            Feb 15 at 7:58










          1




          1





          "I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by an ignorant kanchi mutt follower" - it would be good to remove the name-calling.

          – S K
          Jan 27 at 14:33





          "I was accused of being a madhwa brahmin once by an ignorant kanchi mutt follower" - it would be good to remove the name-calling.

          – S K
          Jan 27 at 14:33




          2




          2





          @S K ok... Like how? That person was a kanchi mutt follower, who was ignorant of traditions acknowledged by his own acharya. Words aren't attacks. I am merely stating the fact.

          – Ambi
          Jan 27 at 14:35





          @S K ok... Like how? That person was a kanchi mutt follower, who was ignorant of traditions acknowledged by his own acharya. Words aren't attacks. I am merely stating the fact.

          – Ambi
          Jan 27 at 14:35













          You can add this to your answer: i.stack.imgur.com/e2kAQ.jpg

          – Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
          Feb 15 at 7:58







          You can add this to your answer: i.stack.imgur.com/e2kAQ.jpg

          – Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury
          Feb 15 at 7:58





          Popular posts from this blog

          Index of /

          Tribalistas

          Várzea Paulista