Closed unit ball in infinite dimensional normed linear space
$begingroup$
I have to prove that in any infinite dimension normed linear space we have that the closed unit ball is not compact.
I know that I have to construct a sequence such that $||x_n||=1$ and $|x_m-x_n|geq frac{1}{2}$. If I can do this then we have a bounded sequence with no convergent subsequence so that this space is not compact but I have no idea how to actually find such a sequence?
Thanks for any help
analysis hilbert-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have to prove that in any infinite dimension normed linear space we have that the closed unit ball is not compact.
I know that I have to construct a sequence such that $||x_n||=1$ and $|x_m-x_n|geq frac{1}{2}$. If I can do this then we have a bounded sequence with no convergent subsequence so that this space is not compact but I have no idea how to actually find such a sequence?
Thanks for any help
analysis hilbert-spaces
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
One approach is to use Riesz's Lemma. See this post. A proof of the lemma can be found here.
$endgroup$
– David Mitra
Apr 10 '13 at 15:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have to prove that in any infinite dimension normed linear space we have that the closed unit ball is not compact.
I know that I have to construct a sequence such that $||x_n||=1$ and $|x_m-x_n|geq frac{1}{2}$. If I can do this then we have a bounded sequence with no convergent subsequence so that this space is not compact but I have no idea how to actually find such a sequence?
Thanks for any help
analysis hilbert-spaces
$endgroup$
I have to prove that in any infinite dimension normed linear space we have that the closed unit ball is not compact.
I know that I have to construct a sequence such that $||x_n||=1$ and $|x_m-x_n|geq frac{1}{2}$. If I can do this then we have a bounded sequence with no convergent subsequence so that this space is not compact but I have no idea how to actually find such a sequence?
Thanks for any help
analysis hilbert-spaces
analysis hilbert-spaces
asked Apr 10 '13 at 14:55
hmmmmhmmmm
2,65922760
2,65922760
$begingroup$
One approach is to use Riesz's Lemma. See this post. A proof of the lemma can be found here.
$endgroup$
– David Mitra
Apr 10 '13 at 15:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One approach is to use Riesz's Lemma. See this post. A proof of the lemma can be found here.
$endgroup$
– David Mitra
Apr 10 '13 at 15:08
$begingroup$
One approach is to use Riesz's Lemma. See this post. A proof of the lemma can be found here.
$endgroup$
– David Mitra
Apr 10 '13 at 15:08
$begingroup$
One approach is to use Riesz's Lemma. See this post. A proof of the lemma can be found here.
$endgroup$
– David Mitra
Apr 10 '13 at 15:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Idea for an indirect proof: Suposse unit ball is compact. Cover it by $cup_{xin B_1 (0)} B_{frac{1}{2}} (x) $. By compactness, there exist points finitely many points $a_i, i=1,dots,n$ such that balls of radius $frac{1}2$ cover unit ball. Then it should be that your space is infact closure of linear span of $a_i$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f357198%2fclosed-unit-ball-in-infinite-dimensional-normed-linear-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Idea for an indirect proof: Suposse unit ball is compact. Cover it by $cup_{xin B_1 (0)} B_{frac{1}{2}} (x) $. By compactness, there exist points finitely many points $a_i, i=1,dots,n$ such that balls of radius $frac{1}2$ cover unit ball. Then it should be that your space is infact closure of linear span of $a_i$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Idea for an indirect proof: Suposse unit ball is compact. Cover it by $cup_{xin B_1 (0)} B_{frac{1}{2}} (x) $. By compactness, there exist points finitely many points $a_i, i=1,dots,n$ such that balls of radius $frac{1}2$ cover unit ball. Then it should be that your space is infact closure of linear span of $a_i$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Idea for an indirect proof: Suposse unit ball is compact. Cover it by $cup_{xin B_1 (0)} B_{frac{1}{2}} (x) $. By compactness, there exist points finitely many points $a_i, i=1,dots,n$ such that balls of radius $frac{1}2$ cover unit ball. Then it should be that your space is infact closure of linear span of $a_i$.
$endgroup$
Idea for an indirect proof: Suposse unit ball is compact. Cover it by $cup_{xin B_1 (0)} B_{frac{1}{2}} (x) $. By compactness, there exist points finitely many points $a_i, i=1,dots,n$ such that balls of radius $frac{1}2$ cover unit ball. Then it should be that your space is infact closure of linear span of $a_i$.
edited Apr 29 '16 at 13:31
answered Apr 29 '16 at 12:50
user133929user133929
164112
164112
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f357198%2fclosed-unit-ball-in-infinite-dimensional-normed-linear-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
One approach is to use Riesz's Lemma. See this post. A proof of the lemma can be found here.
$endgroup$
– David Mitra
Apr 10 '13 at 15:08