Spot all (anti)diagonals with duplicated values












17












$begingroup$


Challenge:



Given a matrix input, determine the amount of diagonals and anti-diagonals with duplicated numbers.

So if we have a matrix like this:



[[aa,ab,ac,ad,ae,af],
[ba,bb,bc,bd,be,bf],
[ca,cb,cc,cd,ce,cf],
[da,db,dc,dd,de,df]]


All diagonals and anti-diagonals would be:



[[aa],[ab,ba],[ac,bb,ca],[ad,bc,cb,da],[ae,bd,cc,db],[af,be,cd,dc],[bf,ce,dd],[cf,de],[df],
[af],[ae,bf],[ad,be,cf],[ac,bd,ce,df],[ab,bc,cd,de],[aa,bb,cc,dd],[ba,cb,dc],[ca,db],[da]]


Example:



[[1,2,1,2,1,2],
[1,2,3,4,5,6],
[6,5,4,3,2,1],
[2,1,2,1,2,1]]


All diagonals and anti-diagonals would be:



[[1],[2,1],[1,2,6],[2,3,5,2],[1,4,4,1],[2,5,3,2],[6,2,1],[1,2],[1],
[2],[1,6],[2,5,1],[1,4,2,1],[2,3,3,2],[1,2,4,1],[1,5,2],[6,1],[2]]


Removing all diagonals and anti-diagonals only containing unique numbers:



[[2,3,5,2],[1,4,4,1],[2,5,3,2],[1,4,2,1],[2,3,3,2],[1,2,4,1]]


So the output is the amount of diagonals and anti-diagonals containing duplicated numbers:



6


Challenge rules:




  • If the input matrix is empty, contains only 1 number, or contains only unique numbers across the entire matrix, the output is always 0.

  • Input is guaranteed to only contain positive digits [1,9] (unless it's completely empty).

  • The matrix will always be rectangular (i.e. all the rows are the same length).

  • I/O is flexible. Input can be taken as a list of lists of integers, or 2D array of integers, or a Matrix-object, as a string, etc. etc. You are also allowed to take one or both of the dimensions of the matrix as additional input if it would save bytes in your language of choice.


General rules:




  • This is code-golf, so shortest answer in bytes wins.

    Don't let code-golf languages discourage you from posting answers with non-codegolfing languages. Try to come up with an as short as possible answer for 'any' programming language.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules, so you are allowed to use STDIN/STDOUT, functions/method with the proper parameters and return-type, full programs. Your call.


  • Default Loopholes are forbidden.

  • If possible, please add a link with a test for your code (i.e. TIO).

  • Also, adding an explanation for your answer is highly recommended.


Test cases:



Input:                     Output:

[[1,2,1,2,1,2], 6
[1,2,3,4,5,6],
[6,5,4,3,2,1],
[2,1,2,1,2,1]]

[] 0

[[1,2], 0
[3,4]]

[[1,1], 2
[1,1]]

[[9,9,9], 6
[9,9,9],
[9,9,9]]

[[7,7,7,7], 8
[7,7,7,7],
[7,7,7,7]]

[[1,1,1], 1
[2,3,4],
[2,5,1]]

[[1,8,4,2,9,4,4,4], 12
[5,1,2,7,7,4,2,3],
[1,4,5,2,4,2,3,8],
[8,5,4,2,3,4,1,5]]

[[1,2,3,4], 4
[5,6,6,7],
[8,6,6,9],
[8,7,6,5]]









share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    17












    $begingroup$


    Challenge:



    Given a matrix input, determine the amount of diagonals and anti-diagonals with duplicated numbers.

    So if we have a matrix like this:



    [[aa,ab,ac,ad,ae,af],
    [ba,bb,bc,bd,be,bf],
    [ca,cb,cc,cd,ce,cf],
    [da,db,dc,dd,de,df]]


    All diagonals and anti-diagonals would be:



    [[aa],[ab,ba],[ac,bb,ca],[ad,bc,cb,da],[ae,bd,cc,db],[af,be,cd,dc],[bf,ce,dd],[cf,de],[df],
    [af],[ae,bf],[ad,be,cf],[ac,bd,ce,df],[ab,bc,cd,de],[aa,bb,cc,dd],[ba,cb,dc],[ca,db],[da]]


    Example:



    [[1,2,1,2,1,2],
    [1,2,3,4,5,6],
    [6,5,4,3,2,1],
    [2,1,2,1,2,1]]


    All diagonals and anti-diagonals would be:



    [[1],[2,1],[1,2,6],[2,3,5,2],[1,4,4,1],[2,5,3,2],[6,2,1],[1,2],[1],
    [2],[1,6],[2,5,1],[1,4,2,1],[2,3,3,2],[1,2,4,1],[1,5,2],[6,1],[2]]


    Removing all diagonals and anti-diagonals only containing unique numbers:



    [[2,3,5,2],[1,4,4,1],[2,5,3,2],[1,4,2,1],[2,3,3,2],[1,2,4,1]]


    So the output is the amount of diagonals and anti-diagonals containing duplicated numbers:



    6


    Challenge rules:




    • If the input matrix is empty, contains only 1 number, or contains only unique numbers across the entire matrix, the output is always 0.

    • Input is guaranteed to only contain positive digits [1,9] (unless it's completely empty).

    • The matrix will always be rectangular (i.e. all the rows are the same length).

    • I/O is flexible. Input can be taken as a list of lists of integers, or 2D array of integers, or a Matrix-object, as a string, etc. etc. You are also allowed to take one or both of the dimensions of the matrix as additional input if it would save bytes in your language of choice.


    General rules:




    • This is code-golf, so shortest answer in bytes wins.

      Don't let code-golf languages discourage you from posting answers with non-codegolfing languages. Try to come up with an as short as possible answer for 'any' programming language.


    • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules, so you are allowed to use STDIN/STDOUT, functions/method with the proper parameters and return-type, full programs. Your call.


    • Default Loopholes are forbidden.

    • If possible, please add a link with a test for your code (i.e. TIO).

    • Also, adding an explanation for your answer is highly recommended.


    Test cases:



    Input:                     Output:

    [[1,2,1,2,1,2], 6
    [1,2,3,4,5,6],
    [6,5,4,3,2,1],
    [2,1,2,1,2,1]]

    [] 0

    [[1,2], 0
    [3,4]]

    [[1,1], 2
    [1,1]]

    [[9,9,9], 6
    [9,9,9],
    [9,9,9]]

    [[7,7,7,7], 8
    [7,7,7,7],
    [7,7,7,7]]

    [[1,1,1], 1
    [2,3,4],
    [2,5,1]]

    [[1,8,4,2,9,4,4,4], 12
    [5,1,2,7,7,4,2,3],
    [1,4,5,2,4,2,3,8],
    [8,5,4,2,3,4,1,5]]

    [[1,2,3,4], 4
    [5,6,6,7],
    [8,6,6,9],
    [8,7,6,5]]









    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      17












      17








      17


      1



      $begingroup$


      Challenge:



      Given a matrix input, determine the amount of diagonals and anti-diagonals with duplicated numbers.

      So if we have a matrix like this:



      [[aa,ab,ac,ad,ae,af],
      [ba,bb,bc,bd,be,bf],
      [ca,cb,cc,cd,ce,cf],
      [da,db,dc,dd,de,df]]


      All diagonals and anti-diagonals would be:



      [[aa],[ab,ba],[ac,bb,ca],[ad,bc,cb,da],[ae,bd,cc,db],[af,be,cd,dc],[bf,ce,dd],[cf,de],[df],
      [af],[ae,bf],[ad,be,cf],[ac,bd,ce,df],[ab,bc,cd,de],[aa,bb,cc,dd],[ba,cb,dc],[ca,db],[da]]


      Example:



      [[1,2,1,2,1,2],
      [1,2,3,4,5,6],
      [6,5,4,3,2,1],
      [2,1,2,1,2,1]]


      All diagonals and anti-diagonals would be:



      [[1],[2,1],[1,2,6],[2,3,5,2],[1,4,4,1],[2,5,3,2],[6,2,1],[1,2],[1],
      [2],[1,6],[2,5,1],[1,4,2,1],[2,3,3,2],[1,2,4,1],[1,5,2],[6,1],[2]]


      Removing all diagonals and anti-diagonals only containing unique numbers:



      [[2,3,5,2],[1,4,4,1],[2,5,3,2],[1,4,2,1],[2,3,3,2],[1,2,4,1]]


      So the output is the amount of diagonals and anti-diagonals containing duplicated numbers:



      6


      Challenge rules:




      • If the input matrix is empty, contains only 1 number, or contains only unique numbers across the entire matrix, the output is always 0.

      • Input is guaranteed to only contain positive digits [1,9] (unless it's completely empty).

      • The matrix will always be rectangular (i.e. all the rows are the same length).

      • I/O is flexible. Input can be taken as a list of lists of integers, or 2D array of integers, or a Matrix-object, as a string, etc. etc. You are also allowed to take one or both of the dimensions of the matrix as additional input if it would save bytes in your language of choice.


      General rules:




      • This is code-golf, so shortest answer in bytes wins.

        Don't let code-golf languages discourage you from posting answers with non-codegolfing languages. Try to come up with an as short as possible answer for 'any' programming language.


      • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules, so you are allowed to use STDIN/STDOUT, functions/method with the proper parameters and return-type, full programs. Your call.


      • Default Loopholes are forbidden.

      • If possible, please add a link with a test for your code (i.e. TIO).

      • Also, adding an explanation for your answer is highly recommended.


      Test cases:



      Input:                     Output:

      [[1,2,1,2,1,2], 6
      [1,2,3,4,5,6],
      [6,5,4,3,2,1],
      [2,1,2,1,2,1]]

      [] 0

      [[1,2], 0
      [3,4]]

      [[1,1], 2
      [1,1]]

      [[9,9,9], 6
      [9,9,9],
      [9,9,9]]

      [[7,7,7,7], 8
      [7,7,7,7],
      [7,7,7,7]]

      [[1,1,1], 1
      [2,3,4],
      [2,5,1]]

      [[1,8,4,2,9,4,4,4], 12
      [5,1,2,7,7,4,2,3],
      [1,4,5,2,4,2,3,8],
      [8,5,4,2,3,4,1,5]]

      [[1,2,3,4], 4
      [5,6,6,7],
      [8,6,6,9],
      [8,7,6,5]]









      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Challenge:



      Given a matrix input, determine the amount of diagonals and anti-diagonals with duplicated numbers.

      So if we have a matrix like this:



      [[aa,ab,ac,ad,ae,af],
      [ba,bb,bc,bd,be,bf],
      [ca,cb,cc,cd,ce,cf],
      [da,db,dc,dd,de,df]]


      All diagonals and anti-diagonals would be:



      [[aa],[ab,ba],[ac,bb,ca],[ad,bc,cb,da],[ae,bd,cc,db],[af,be,cd,dc],[bf,ce,dd],[cf,de],[df],
      [af],[ae,bf],[ad,be,cf],[ac,bd,ce,df],[ab,bc,cd,de],[aa,bb,cc,dd],[ba,cb,dc],[ca,db],[da]]


      Example:



      [[1,2,1,2,1,2],
      [1,2,3,4,5,6],
      [6,5,4,3,2,1],
      [2,1,2,1,2,1]]


      All diagonals and anti-diagonals would be:



      [[1],[2,1],[1,2,6],[2,3,5,2],[1,4,4,1],[2,5,3,2],[6,2,1],[1,2],[1],
      [2],[1,6],[2,5,1],[1,4,2,1],[2,3,3,2],[1,2,4,1],[1,5,2],[6,1],[2]]


      Removing all diagonals and anti-diagonals only containing unique numbers:



      [[2,3,5,2],[1,4,4,1],[2,5,3,2],[1,4,2,1],[2,3,3,2],[1,2,4,1]]


      So the output is the amount of diagonals and anti-diagonals containing duplicated numbers:



      6


      Challenge rules:




      • If the input matrix is empty, contains only 1 number, or contains only unique numbers across the entire matrix, the output is always 0.

      • Input is guaranteed to only contain positive digits [1,9] (unless it's completely empty).

      • The matrix will always be rectangular (i.e. all the rows are the same length).

      • I/O is flexible. Input can be taken as a list of lists of integers, or 2D array of integers, or a Matrix-object, as a string, etc. etc. You are also allowed to take one or both of the dimensions of the matrix as additional input if it would save bytes in your language of choice.


      General rules:




      • This is code-golf, so shortest answer in bytes wins.

        Don't let code-golf languages discourage you from posting answers with non-codegolfing languages. Try to come up with an as short as possible answer for 'any' programming language.


      • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules, so you are allowed to use STDIN/STDOUT, functions/method with the proper parameters and return-type, full programs. Your call.


      • Default Loopholes are forbidden.

      • If possible, please add a link with a test for your code (i.e. TIO).

      • Also, adding an explanation for your answer is highly recommended.


      Test cases:



      Input:                     Output:

      [[1,2,1,2,1,2], 6
      [1,2,3,4,5,6],
      [6,5,4,3,2,1],
      [2,1,2,1,2,1]]

      [] 0

      [[1,2], 0
      [3,4]]

      [[1,1], 2
      [1,1]]

      [[9,9,9], 6
      [9,9,9],
      [9,9,9]]

      [[7,7,7,7], 8
      [7,7,7,7],
      [7,7,7,7]]

      [[1,1,1], 1
      [2,3,4],
      [2,5,1]]

      [[1,8,4,2,9,4,4,4], 12
      [5,1,2,7,7,4,2,3],
      [1,4,5,2,4,2,3,8],
      [8,5,4,2,3,4,1,5]]

      [[1,2,3,4], 4
      [5,6,6,7],
      [8,6,6,9],
      [8,7,6,5]]






      code-golf number arithmetic matrix






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 26 at 19:12









      Solomon Ucko

      366110




      366110










      asked Jan 25 at 10:31









      Kevin CruijssenKevin Cruijssen

      38.1k557197




      38.1k557197






















          14 Answers
          14






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$


          Jelly, 10 bytes



          ŒD;ŒdQƑÐḟL


          Try it online! or Check out the test suite!



          Alternatives:



          ŒD;ŒdQƑ€¬S
          ŒD;ŒdQƑ€ċ0


          How it works?



          ŒD;ŒdQƑÐḟL – Monadic link / Full program.
          ; – Join:
          ŒD – The diagonals
          with
          Œd – The anti-diagonals.
          Ðḟ – Discard the lists that are not:
          QƑ – Invariant under deduplication.
          L – Length (count them).





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            10












            $begingroup$


            R, 92 86 82 78 bytes





            function(m,x=row(m),y=col(m),`|`=split,`^`=Map)sum(max^table^c(m|x-y,m|x+y)>1)


            Try it online!



            Explanation



            First, we declare additional variables $x$ and $y$ that stand for row and column indices, respectively. Then we can delineate the diagonals and anti-diagonals by taking their difference and sum. E.g., for a 4x4 matrix:



            $x-y$ gives:



            0 -1 -2 -3
            1 0 -1 -2
            2 1 0 -1
            3 2 1 0



            $x+y$ gives:



            2 3 4 5
            3 4 5 6
            4 5 6 7
            5 6 7 8



            Now split(m, x-y) and split(m, x+y) produce the actual lists of diagonals and anti-diagonals, which we join together.



            Finally, we count the entries of the resulting list where duplicates are present.



            Thanks for bytes saved:



            -4 by CriminallyVulgar

            -4 by digEmAll






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Guess I can add row and col to my list of 'extremely situational functions'. Really clever solution.
              $endgroup$
              – CriminallyVulgar
              Jan 25 at 14:03






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think you can move the c(m|x-y,m|x+y) straight into the sapply call, remove the l= part. I don't see any failed tests. Try it online!
              $endgroup$
              – CriminallyVulgar
              Jan 25 at 14:11










            • $begingroup$
              Yep, that's correct, I just missed that after my first golf, there was only a single l instance remaining.
              $endgroup$
              – Kirill L.
              Jan 25 at 14:17






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              They must have added the row and column functions to R this morning, because I've never heard of them.
              $endgroup$
              – ngm
              Jan 25 at 15:05



















            5












            $begingroup$


            J, 21 20 bytes



            -1 byte thanks to Jonah!



            1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]


            Try it online!



            Explanation:



            1#.                   find the sum of the  
            , concatenation of
            ( ) the result of the verb in the parentheses applied to
            ] the input
            & and
            |. the reversed input
            ( )/. for each diagonal
            ~:&#~. check if all elements are unique and negate the result





            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              it's kind of crazy that you can't do better than (-.@-:~.) for "the unique items don't match" in J but i've encountered this many times too and i don't think you can... we have = and ~:, on one hand, and -: and <this is missing>.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonah
              Jan 25 at 18:23












            • $begingroup$
              Actually, managed to shave 1 more byte off: 1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]. Try it online!
              $endgroup$
              – Jonah
              Jan 25 at 23:40










            • $begingroup$
              @Jonah: cool use of &, thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Galen Ivanov
              Jan 26 at 7:46



















            5












            $begingroup$


            Japt, 31 bytes



            ËcUî
            ËéEÃÕc¡XéYnÃÕ mf fÊk_eZâÃl


            Try all test cases



            Explanation:



            Ëc                            #Pad each row...
            Uî #With a number of 0s equal to the number of rows

            ËéEÃÕ #Get the anti-diagonals:
            ËéEÃ # Rotate each row right a number of times equal to the row's index
            Õ # Get the resulting columns
            c #Add to that...
            ¡XéYnÃÕ #The diagonals:
            ¡XéYnà # Rotate each row left a number of times equal to the row's index
            Õ # Get the resulting columns
            mf #Remove the 0s from each diagonal
            fÊ #Remove the all-0 diagonals
            k_ Ã #Remove the ones where:
            eZâ # The list contains no duplicates
            l #Return the number of remaining diagonals


            I also tried a version based on Kirill L.'s Haskell answer, but couldn't find a good way to "group by a function of the X and Y indices" and the alternative I found wasn't good enough.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              31 bytes
              $endgroup$
              – Shaggy
              Jan 26 at 21:38



















            4












            $begingroup$

            JavaScript (ES6),  107 105 101  98 bytes





            f=(m,d=s=1)=>(m+0)[s-=~d/2]?m.some(o=(r,y)=>!r.every((v,x)=>x+d*y+m.length-s?1:o[v]^=1))+f(m,-d):0


            Try it online!



            Note



            The way this code is golfed, the anti-diagonal consisting of the sole bottom-left cell is never tested. That's OK because it can't possibly contain duplicated values.



            Commented



            f = (                    // f = recursive function taking:
            m, // m = input matrix
            d = // d = direction (1 for anti-diagonal or -1 for diagonal)
            s = 1 // s = expected diagonal ID, which is defined as either the sum
            ) => // or the difference of x and y + the length of a row
            (m + 0)[ //
            s -= ~d / 2 // increment s if d = -1 or leave it unchanged otherwise
            ] ? // if s is less than twice the total number of cells:
            m.some(o = // o = object used to store encountered values in this diagonal
            (r, y) => // for each row r at position y in m:
            !r.every((v, x) => // for each cell of value v at position x in r:
            x + d * y + // x + d * y + m.length is the ID of the diagonal
            m.length - s ? // if it's not equal to the one we're looking for:
            1 // yield 1
            : // else:
            o[v] ^= 1 // toggle o[v]; if it's equal to 0, v is a duplicate and
            // every() fails which -- in turn -- makes some() succeed
            ) // end of every()
            ) // end of some()
            + f(m, -d) // add the result of a recursive call in the opposite direction
            : // else:
            0 // stop recursion





            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$





















              4












              $begingroup$


              05AB1E, 25 bytes



              í‚εεygÅ0«NFÁ]€ø`«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g


              Try it online!
              or as a Test Suite



              Explanation



              í                          # reverse each row in input
              ‚ # and pair with the input
              ε # for each matrix
              ε # for each row in the matrix
              ygÅ0« # append len(row) zeroes
              NFÁ # and rotate it index(row) elements to the right
              ] # end loops
              €ø # transpose each matrix
              `« # append them together
              ʒ } # filter, keep only rows that
              0K # when zeroes are removed
              DÙÊ # are not equal to themselves without duplicate values
              g # push length of the result


              I feel like I've missed something here.

              Need to try and golf this more later.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Doesn't help at all, but rotate N left would be N._ now. So í‚εεygÅ0«N._] also works. Can also remove the flatten with this new change... still no byte savings though: í‚vyεygÅ0«N._}ø}«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g
                $endgroup$
                – Magic Octopus Urn
                Jan 29 at 19:45








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @MagicOctopusUrn: Interesting. I had missed that command. Only a left though. Thats weird.
                $endgroup$
                – Emigna
                Jan 29 at 21:24






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @Emigna You can go right with N(._ I guess, but your NFÁ} is the same length, and even shorter in this case due to ] closing the loop and maps simultaneously. Overall the use of ._ is only useful when going left to save 1 byte, in comparison to NFÀ}.
                $endgroup$
                – Kevin Cruijssen
                Jan 31 at 8:26










              • $begingroup$
                @KevinCruijssen: Ah, cool. Although as you say, not very useful.
                $endgroup$
                – Emigna
                Jan 31 at 8:59



















              3












              $begingroup$


              Python 2, 144 136 bytes





              lambda m:sum(l(set(d))<l(d)for d in[[r[i*x+o]for i,r in enumerate(m)if-1<i*x+o<l(r)]for o in range(-l(`m`),l(`m`))for x in[-1,1]])
              l=len


              Try it online!






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$





















                3












                $begingroup$


                Octave, 98 bytes





                @(A)nnz([(q=@(Q)arrayfun(@(n)nnz(z=diag(Q,n))-nnz(unique(z)),-([m,n]=size(Q)):n))(A),q(rot90(A))])


                Try it online!






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$









                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  Are arrays indeed fun? ;p
                  $endgroup$
                  – Kevin Cruijssen
                  Jan 25 at 14:28










                • $begingroup$
                  And thanks for preparing the test cases in Octave format!
                  $endgroup$
                  – Luis Mendo
                  Jan 26 at 1:05






                • 2




                  $begingroup$
                  @KevinCruijssen Not just arrays! You can have cellfun too, and for the masochistic, structfun as well. In Octave, it's either a for-loop or having fun!
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sanchises
                  Jan 26 at 7:06










                • $begingroup$
                  And don’t forget b-sx-fun!
                  $endgroup$
                  – Luis Mendo
                  Jan 26 at 10:24



















                3












                $begingroup$

                Haskell, 118 112 bytes



                import Data.List
                r#(a:b)=sum[1|(/=)=<<nub$[h|h:_<-a:r]]+[t|_:t<-a:r]#b
                #_=0
                a#_=a#[]
                h x=#x+#(reverse x)


                Try it online!



                r#(a:b)                      -- function '#' calculates the ant-diagonals of a matrix
                -- where 'a' is the first row and 'b' all the others
                -- as we recursively walk down the rows of the matrix,
                -- 'r' holds the rows from before with the respective
                -- head dropped
                --
                [h|h:_<-a:r] -- if the heads of the the current row and the rows
                -- before
                (/=)=<<nub$ -- contain duplicates
                [1| ] -- make a singleton list [1] (else the empty list)
                sum -- and take the sum thereof
                + -- and add
                # -- a recursive call with
                [t|_:t<-a:r] -- the tails of the current row and the rows before
                b -- and the rows below
                --
                #_=0 -- base case if there aren't any tails anymore, return 0
                a#_=a#[] -- if there are tails, but no further rows below,
                -- continue with tails

                h x=#x+#(reverse x) -- main function, call '#' with input matrix 'x'
                -- and the reverse of it to get the number of diagonals
                -- and anti-diagonals. Recursion starts with no
                -- rows before the 1st row.

                -- example trace of function '#'
                -- input matrix:
                -- [[1,2,3,4],
                -- [5,6,7,8],
                -- [9,9,9,9]]
                --
                -- | r a b a:r heads tails (r of next call)
                -- -+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                -- 1| [1,2,3,4] [[5,6,7,8], [[1,2,3,4]] [1] [[2,3,4]]
                -- | [9,9,9,9]]
                -- |
                -- 2| [[2,3,4]] [5,6,7,8] [[9,9,9,9]] [[5,6,7,8], [5,2] [[6,7,8],
                -- | [2,3,4 ]] [3,4 ]]
                -- |
                -- 3| [[6,7,8], [9,9,9,9] [[9,9,9,9], [9,6,3] [[9,9,9],
                -- | [3,4 ]] [6,7,8 ], [7,8 ]
                -- | [3,4 ], [4 ]
                -- |
                -- | ....





                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$





















                  2












                  $begingroup$


                  Charcoal, 61 56 53 bytes



                  F²FLθFL§θ⁰F⟦⁻κ×⊖⊗ιλ⟧⊞υ⊞O⎇∧λ﹪⁺μιLθ⊟υ⟦⟧§§θμλILΦυ⊙ι‹⌕ιλμ


                  Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                  F²


                  Loop over forward and reverse diagonals; i=0 represents forward diagonals while i=1 represents reverse diagonals.



                  FLθ


                  Loop over each row index. This represents the index of the start of the diagonal.



                  FL§θ⁰«


                  Loop over each column index.



                  F⟦⁻κ×⊖⊗ιλ⟧


                  Calculate the row index of the diagonal at this column index. I use a for loop over a single-element array instead of an assignment as this avoids having to wrap the assignment into a block with the following statement, thus saving a byte.



                  ⎇∧λ﹪⁺μιLθ


                  Check whether this is the first column or the diagonal is about to wrap around between bottom and top.



                  ⊟υ


                  If it isn't then pop the last list from the list of lists.



                  ⟦⟧


                  if it is then start a new empty list.



                  ⊞O...§§θμλ


                  Add the current diagonal entry to that list.



                  ⊞υ


                  And push that list (back) to the list of lists.



                  ILΦυ⊙ι‹⌕ιλμ


                  Count the number of lists that contain duplicates.



                  Let's take an example when i=0 and k=1. This means that we've already collected two diagonals, [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5]]. Here's our input:



                   1 8 4 2 9 4 4 4
                  [5]1 2 7 7 4 2 3
                  1 4 5 2 4 2 3 8
                  8 5 4 2 3 4 1 5


                  We then loop l from 0 to 7. This advances both the row and column by 1 each time:



                   1 8 4 2 9 4 4 4
                  [5]1 2 7 7 4 2 3
                  1[4]5 2 4 2 3 8
                  8 5[4]2 3 4 1 5


                  The list is now [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4]]. However when l is 3, we have k+l=4, a multiple of the height of the array. This means that we need to start a new list: [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],]. We then continue to collect diagonal elements:



                   1 8 4[2]9 4 4 4
                  [5]1 2 7[7]4 2 3
                  1[4]5 2 4[2]3 8
                  8 5[4]2 3 4[1]5


                  The list is now [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],[2,7,2,1]]. Now when l is 7, we have k+l=8, another multiple of the height of the array. This means that we need to start a new list, which ends up with the last element of that diagonal: [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],[2,7,2,1],[4]].



                   1 8 4[2]9 4 4[4]
                  [5]1 2 7[7]4 2 3
                  1[4]5 2 4[2]3 8
                  8 5[4]2 3 4[1]5


                  By collecting wrapping diagonals starting at the first element of each row we eventually accumulate all of the diagonals of the array.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$





















                    2












                    $begingroup$


                    Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 99 98 96 94 83 bytes



                    Count[DuplicateFreeQ@Diagonal[#,i]~Table~{i,-t,t=#~Total~2}&/@{#,Reverse@#},1<0,2]&


                    Try it online!





                    • Function[a,a~Diagonal~#&/@Range[t=-#~Total~2,-t]] gets all diagonals of a-- which works because #~Total~2 is larger than any dimension of a.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      APL+WIN, 69 bytes



                      Prompts for a 2d matrix of the form 4 6⍴1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1



                      This yields:



                      1 2 1 2 1 2
                      1 2 3 4 5 6
                      6 5 4 3 2 1
                      2 1 2 1 2 1

                      +/~(v⍳¨v)≡¨⍳¨⍴¨v←(v←⊂[1](⌽0,⍳1↓n)⌽(n⍴0),m,((n←0 ¯1+↑⍴m)⍴0),⌽m←⎕)~¨0


                      Try it online! Courtesy of Dyalog Classic



                      Explanation:



                      (⌽0,⍳1↓n)⌽(n⍴0),m pad m with zeros to isolate diagonals

                      ((n←0 ¯1+↑⍴m)⍴0),⌽m pad rotated m with zeros to isolate anti-diagonals


                      Yields:



                      1 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0
                      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0
                      0 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0
                      0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 2

                      v←(v←⊂[1](.....)~¨0 enclose the diagonals as a nested vector with padded zeros removed

                      +/~(v⍳¨v)≡¨⍳¨⍴¨v identify diagnols with duplicate entries and sum





                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$





















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Perl 5, 89 82 bytes



                        map{$i=0;map{$a[$x+$i].=$_;$b[@F-$x+$i++].=$_}/d/g;$x++}@F;$_=grep/(.).*1/,@a,@b


                        TIO






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$





















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          TSQL, 140 128 bytes



                          Found a way to golf 12 characters. This is no longer the longest solution.



                          Golfed:



                          SELECT sum(iif(y+x=j+i,1,0)+iif(y-x=j-i,1,0))FROM
                          @,(SELECT x i,y j,max(y)over()m,v w
                          FROM @)d WHERE(x*y=0or m=y)and v=w and x<i


                          Ungolfed:



                          DECLARE @ table(v int,x int,y int)
                          -- v = value
                          -- x = row
                          -- y = column
                          INSERT @ values
                          (1,0,0),(2,0,1),(1,0,2),(2,0,3),(1,0,4),(2,0,5),
                          (1,1,0),(2,1,1),(3,1,2),(4,1,3),(5,1,4),(6,1,5),
                          (6,2,0),(5,2,1),(4,2,2),(3,2,3),(2,2,4),(1,2,5),
                          (2,3,0),(1,3,1),(2,3,2),(1,3,3),(2,3,4),(1,3,5)


                          SELECT sum(iif(y+x=j+i,1,0)+iif(y-x=j-i,1,0))
                          FROM @,(SELECT x i,y j,max(y)over()m,v w FROM @)d
                          WHERE
                          (x*y=0or m=y)
                          and v=w
                          and x<i


                          Try it out






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$













                            Your Answer





                            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
                            });
                            });
                            }, "mathjax-editing");

                            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
                            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
                            StackExchange.snippets.init();
                            });
                            });
                            }, "code-snippets");

                            StackExchange.ready(function() {
                            var channelOptions = {
                            tags: "".split(" "),
                            id: "200"
                            };
                            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                            createEditor();
                            });
                            }
                            else {
                            createEditor();
                            }
                            });

                            function createEditor() {
                            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                            heartbeatType: 'answer',
                            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                            convertImagesToLinks: false,
                            noModals: true,
                            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                            reputationToPostImages: null,
                            bindNavPrevention: true,
                            postfix: "",
                            imageUploader: {
                            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                            allowUrls: true
                            },
                            onDemand: true,
                            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                            });


                            }
                            });














                            draft saved

                            draft discarded


















                            StackExchange.ready(
                            function () {
                            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f179108%2fspot-all-antidiagonals-with-duplicated-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                            }
                            );

                            Post as a guest















                            Required, but never shown

























                            14 Answers
                            14






                            active

                            oldest

                            votes








                            14 Answers
                            14






                            active

                            oldest

                            votes









                            active

                            oldest

                            votes






                            active

                            oldest

                            votes









                            4












                            $begingroup$


                            Jelly, 10 bytes



                            ŒD;ŒdQƑÐḟL


                            Try it online! or Check out the test suite!



                            Alternatives:



                            ŒD;ŒdQƑ€¬S
                            ŒD;ŒdQƑ€ċ0


                            How it works?



                            ŒD;ŒdQƑÐḟL – Monadic link / Full program.
                            ; – Join:
                            ŒD – The diagonals
                            with
                            Œd – The anti-diagonals.
                            Ðḟ – Discard the lists that are not:
                            QƑ – Invariant under deduplication.
                            L – Length (count them).





                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$


















                              4












                              $begingroup$


                              Jelly, 10 bytes



                              ŒD;ŒdQƑÐḟL


                              Try it online! or Check out the test suite!



                              Alternatives:



                              ŒD;ŒdQƑ€¬S
                              ŒD;ŒdQƑ€ċ0


                              How it works?



                              ŒD;ŒdQƑÐḟL – Monadic link / Full program.
                              ; – Join:
                              ŒD – The diagonals
                              with
                              Œd – The anti-diagonals.
                              Ðḟ – Discard the lists that are not:
                              QƑ – Invariant under deduplication.
                              L – Length (count them).





                              share|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$
















                                4












                                4








                                4





                                $begingroup$


                                Jelly, 10 bytes



                                ŒD;ŒdQƑÐḟL


                                Try it online! or Check out the test suite!



                                Alternatives:



                                ŒD;ŒdQƑ€¬S
                                ŒD;ŒdQƑ€ċ0


                                How it works?



                                ŒD;ŒdQƑÐḟL – Monadic link / Full program.
                                ; – Join:
                                ŒD – The diagonals
                                with
                                Œd – The anti-diagonals.
                                Ðḟ – Discard the lists that are not:
                                QƑ – Invariant under deduplication.
                                L – Length (count them).





                                share|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$




                                Jelly, 10 bytes



                                ŒD;ŒdQƑÐḟL


                                Try it online! or Check out the test suite!



                                Alternatives:



                                ŒD;ŒdQƑ€¬S
                                ŒD;ŒdQƑ€ċ0


                                How it works?



                                ŒD;ŒdQƑÐḟL – Monadic link / Full program.
                                ; – Join:
                                ŒD – The diagonals
                                with
                                Œd – The anti-diagonals.
                                Ðḟ – Discard the lists that are not:
                                QƑ – Invariant under deduplication.
                                L – Length (count them).






                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited Jan 25 at 12:00

























                                answered Jan 25 at 11:49









                                Don't be a x-triple dotDon't be a x-triple dot

                                32k759199




                                32k759199























                                    10












                                    $begingroup$


                                    R, 92 86 82 78 bytes





                                    function(m,x=row(m),y=col(m),`|`=split,`^`=Map)sum(max^table^c(m|x-y,m|x+y)>1)


                                    Try it online!



                                    Explanation



                                    First, we declare additional variables $x$ and $y$ that stand for row and column indices, respectively. Then we can delineate the diagonals and anti-diagonals by taking their difference and sum. E.g., for a 4x4 matrix:



                                    $x-y$ gives:



                                    0 -1 -2 -3
                                    1 0 -1 -2
                                    2 1 0 -1
                                    3 2 1 0



                                    $x+y$ gives:



                                    2 3 4 5
                                    3 4 5 6
                                    4 5 6 7
                                    5 6 7 8



                                    Now split(m, x-y) and split(m, x+y) produce the actual lists of diagonals and anti-diagonals, which we join together.



                                    Finally, we count the entries of the resulting list where duplicates are present.



                                    Thanks for bytes saved:



                                    -4 by CriminallyVulgar

                                    -4 by digEmAll






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$









                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      Guess I can add row and col to my list of 'extremely situational functions'. Really clever solution.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – CriminallyVulgar
                                      Jan 25 at 14:03






                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      I think you can move the c(m|x-y,m|x+y) straight into the sapply call, remove the l= part. I don't see any failed tests. Try it online!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – CriminallyVulgar
                                      Jan 25 at 14:11










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      Yep, that's correct, I just missed that after my first golf, there was only a single l instance remaining.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Kirill L.
                                      Jan 25 at 14:17






                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      They must have added the row and column functions to R this morning, because I've never heard of them.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – ngm
                                      Jan 25 at 15:05
















                                    10












                                    $begingroup$


                                    R, 92 86 82 78 bytes





                                    function(m,x=row(m),y=col(m),`|`=split,`^`=Map)sum(max^table^c(m|x-y,m|x+y)>1)


                                    Try it online!



                                    Explanation



                                    First, we declare additional variables $x$ and $y$ that stand for row and column indices, respectively. Then we can delineate the diagonals and anti-diagonals by taking their difference and sum. E.g., for a 4x4 matrix:



                                    $x-y$ gives:



                                    0 -1 -2 -3
                                    1 0 -1 -2
                                    2 1 0 -1
                                    3 2 1 0



                                    $x+y$ gives:



                                    2 3 4 5
                                    3 4 5 6
                                    4 5 6 7
                                    5 6 7 8



                                    Now split(m, x-y) and split(m, x+y) produce the actual lists of diagonals and anti-diagonals, which we join together.



                                    Finally, we count the entries of the resulting list where duplicates are present.



                                    Thanks for bytes saved:



                                    -4 by CriminallyVulgar

                                    -4 by digEmAll






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$









                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      Guess I can add row and col to my list of 'extremely situational functions'. Really clever solution.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – CriminallyVulgar
                                      Jan 25 at 14:03






                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      I think you can move the c(m|x-y,m|x+y) straight into the sapply call, remove the l= part. I don't see any failed tests. Try it online!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – CriminallyVulgar
                                      Jan 25 at 14:11










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      Yep, that's correct, I just missed that after my first golf, there was only a single l instance remaining.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Kirill L.
                                      Jan 25 at 14:17






                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      They must have added the row and column functions to R this morning, because I've never heard of them.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – ngm
                                      Jan 25 at 15:05














                                    10












                                    10








                                    10





                                    $begingroup$


                                    R, 92 86 82 78 bytes





                                    function(m,x=row(m),y=col(m),`|`=split,`^`=Map)sum(max^table^c(m|x-y,m|x+y)>1)


                                    Try it online!



                                    Explanation



                                    First, we declare additional variables $x$ and $y$ that stand for row and column indices, respectively. Then we can delineate the diagonals and anti-diagonals by taking their difference and sum. E.g., for a 4x4 matrix:



                                    $x-y$ gives:



                                    0 -1 -2 -3
                                    1 0 -1 -2
                                    2 1 0 -1
                                    3 2 1 0



                                    $x+y$ gives:



                                    2 3 4 5
                                    3 4 5 6
                                    4 5 6 7
                                    5 6 7 8



                                    Now split(m, x-y) and split(m, x+y) produce the actual lists of diagonals and anti-diagonals, which we join together.



                                    Finally, we count the entries of the resulting list where duplicates are present.



                                    Thanks for bytes saved:



                                    -4 by CriminallyVulgar

                                    -4 by digEmAll






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$




                                    R, 92 86 82 78 bytes





                                    function(m,x=row(m),y=col(m),`|`=split,`^`=Map)sum(max^table^c(m|x-y,m|x+y)>1)


                                    Try it online!



                                    Explanation



                                    First, we declare additional variables $x$ and $y$ that stand for row and column indices, respectively. Then we can delineate the diagonals and anti-diagonals by taking their difference and sum. E.g., for a 4x4 matrix:



                                    $x-y$ gives:



                                    0 -1 -2 -3
                                    1 0 -1 -2
                                    2 1 0 -1
                                    3 2 1 0



                                    $x+y$ gives:



                                    2 3 4 5
                                    3 4 5 6
                                    4 5 6 7
                                    5 6 7 8



                                    Now split(m, x-y) and split(m, x+y) produce the actual lists of diagonals and anti-diagonals, which we join together.



                                    Finally, we count the entries of the resulting list where duplicates are present.



                                    Thanks for bytes saved:



                                    -4 by CriminallyVulgar

                                    -4 by digEmAll







                                    share|improve this answer














                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer








                                    edited Jan 26 at 19:28

























                                    answered Jan 25 at 12:02









                                    Kirill L.Kirill L.

                                    4,3751523




                                    4,3751523








                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      Guess I can add row and col to my list of 'extremely situational functions'. Really clever solution.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – CriminallyVulgar
                                      Jan 25 at 14:03






                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      I think you can move the c(m|x-y,m|x+y) straight into the sapply call, remove the l= part. I don't see any failed tests. Try it online!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – CriminallyVulgar
                                      Jan 25 at 14:11










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      Yep, that's correct, I just missed that after my first golf, there was only a single l instance remaining.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Kirill L.
                                      Jan 25 at 14:17






                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      They must have added the row and column functions to R this morning, because I've never heard of them.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – ngm
                                      Jan 25 at 15:05














                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      Guess I can add row and col to my list of 'extremely situational functions'. Really clever solution.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – CriminallyVulgar
                                      Jan 25 at 14:03






                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      I think you can move the c(m|x-y,m|x+y) straight into the sapply call, remove the l= part. I don't see any failed tests. Try it online!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – CriminallyVulgar
                                      Jan 25 at 14:11










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      Yep, that's correct, I just missed that after my first golf, there was only a single l instance remaining.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Kirill L.
                                      Jan 25 at 14:17






                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      They must have added the row and column functions to R this morning, because I've never heard of them.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – ngm
                                      Jan 25 at 15:05








                                    1




                                    1




                                    $begingroup$
                                    Guess I can add row and col to my list of 'extremely situational functions'. Really clever solution.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – CriminallyVulgar
                                    Jan 25 at 14:03




                                    $begingroup$
                                    Guess I can add row and col to my list of 'extremely situational functions'. Really clever solution.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – CriminallyVulgar
                                    Jan 25 at 14:03




                                    1




                                    1




                                    $begingroup$
                                    I think you can move the c(m|x-y,m|x+y) straight into the sapply call, remove the l= part. I don't see any failed tests. Try it online!
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – CriminallyVulgar
                                    Jan 25 at 14:11




                                    $begingroup$
                                    I think you can move the c(m|x-y,m|x+y) straight into the sapply call, remove the l= part. I don't see any failed tests. Try it online!
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – CriminallyVulgar
                                    Jan 25 at 14:11












                                    $begingroup$
                                    Yep, that's correct, I just missed that after my first golf, there was only a single l instance remaining.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Kirill L.
                                    Jan 25 at 14:17




                                    $begingroup$
                                    Yep, that's correct, I just missed that after my first golf, there was only a single l instance remaining.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Kirill L.
                                    Jan 25 at 14:17




                                    1




                                    1




                                    $begingroup$
                                    They must have added the row and column functions to R this morning, because I've never heard of them.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – ngm
                                    Jan 25 at 15:05




                                    $begingroup$
                                    They must have added the row and column functions to R this morning, because I've never heard of them.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – ngm
                                    Jan 25 at 15:05











                                    5












                                    $begingroup$


                                    J, 21 20 bytes



                                    -1 byte thanks to Jonah!



                                    1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]


                                    Try it online!



                                    Explanation:



                                    1#.                   find the sum of the  
                                    , concatenation of
                                    ( ) the result of the verb in the parentheses applied to
                                    ] the input
                                    & and
                                    |. the reversed input
                                    ( )/. for each diagonal
                                    ~:&#~. check if all elements are unique and negate the result





                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$









                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      it's kind of crazy that you can't do better than (-.@-:~.) for "the unique items don't match" in J but i've encountered this many times too and i don't think you can... we have = and ~:, on one hand, and -: and <this is missing>.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Jonah
                                      Jan 25 at 18:23












                                    • $begingroup$
                                      Actually, managed to shave 1 more byte off: 1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]. Try it online!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Jonah
                                      Jan 25 at 23:40










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      @Jonah: cool use of &, thanks!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Galen Ivanov
                                      Jan 26 at 7:46
















                                    5












                                    $begingroup$


                                    J, 21 20 bytes



                                    -1 byte thanks to Jonah!



                                    1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]


                                    Try it online!



                                    Explanation:



                                    1#.                   find the sum of the  
                                    , concatenation of
                                    ( ) the result of the verb in the parentheses applied to
                                    ] the input
                                    & and
                                    |. the reversed input
                                    ( )/. for each diagonal
                                    ~:&#~. check if all elements are unique and negate the result





                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$









                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      it's kind of crazy that you can't do better than (-.@-:~.) for "the unique items don't match" in J but i've encountered this many times too and i don't think you can... we have = and ~:, on one hand, and -: and <this is missing>.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Jonah
                                      Jan 25 at 18:23












                                    • $begingroup$
                                      Actually, managed to shave 1 more byte off: 1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]. Try it online!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Jonah
                                      Jan 25 at 23:40










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      @Jonah: cool use of &, thanks!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Galen Ivanov
                                      Jan 26 at 7:46














                                    5












                                    5








                                    5





                                    $begingroup$


                                    J, 21 20 bytes



                                    -1 byte thanks to Jonah!



                                    1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]


                                    Try it online!



                                    Explanation:



                                    1#.                   find the sum of the  
                                    , concatenation of
                                    ( ) the result of the verb in the parentheses applied to
                                    ] the input
                                    & and
                                    |. the reversed input
                                    ( )/. for each diagonal
                                    ~:&#~. check if all elements are unique and negate the result





                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$




                                    J, 21 20 bytes



                                    -1 byte thanks to Jonah!



                                    1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]


                                    Try it online!



                                    Explanation:



                                    1#.                   find the sum of the  
                                    , concatenation of
                                    ( ) the result of the verb in the parentheses applied to
                                    ] the input
                                    & and
                                    |. the reversed input
                                    ( )/. for each diagonal
                                    ~:&#~. check if all elements are unique and negate the result






                                    share|improve this answer














                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer








                                    edited Jan 26 at 7:45

























                                    answered Jan 25 at 11:55









                                    Galen IvanovGalen Ivanov

                                    6,78711033




                                    6,78711033








                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      it's kind of crazy that you can't do better than (-.@-:~.) for "the unique items don't match" in J but i've encountered this many times too and i don't think you can... we have = and ~:, on one hand, and -: and <this is missing>.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Jonah
                                      Jan 25 at 18:23












                                    • $begingroup$
                                      Actually, managed to shave 1 more byte off: 1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]. Try it online!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Jonah
                                      Jan 25 at 23:40










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      @Jonah: cool use of &, thanks!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Galen Ivanov
                                      Jan 26 at 7:46














                                    • 1




                                      $begingroup$
                                      it's kind of crazy that you can't do better than (-.@-:~.) for "the unique items don't match" in J but i've encountered this many times too and i don't think you can... we have = and ~:, on one hand, and -: and <this is missing>.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Jonah
                                      Jan 25 at 18:23












                                    • $begingroup$
                                      Actually, managed to shave 1 more byte off: 1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]. Try it online!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Jonah
                                      Jan 25 at 23:40










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      @Jonah: cool use of &, thanks!
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Galen Ivanov
                                      Jan 26 at 7:46








                                    1




                                    1




                                    $begingroup$
                                    it's kind of crazy that you can't do better than (-.@-:~.) for "the unique items don't match" in J but i've encountered this many times too and i don't think you can... we have = and ~:, on one hand, and -: and <this is missing>.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Jonah
                                    Jan 25 at 18:23






                                    $begingroup$
                                    it's kind of crazy that you can't do better than (-.@-:~.) for "the unique items don't match" in J but i've encountered this many times too and i don't think you can... we have = and ~:, on one hand, and -: and <this is missing>.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Jonah
                                    Jan 25 at 18:23














                                    $begingroup$
                                    Actually, managed to shave 1 more byte off: 1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]. Try it online!
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Jonah
                                    Jan 25 at 23:40




                                    $begingroup$
                                    Actually, managed to shave 1 more byte off: 1#.|.,&((~:&#~.)/.)]. Try it online!
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Jonah
                                    Jan 25 at 23:40












                                    $begingroup$
                                    @Jonah: cool use of &, thanks!
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Galen Ivanov
                                    Jan 26 at 7:46




                                    $begingroup$
                                    @Jonah: cool use of &, thanks!
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Galen Ivanov
                                    Jan 26 at 7:46











                                    5












                                    $begingroup$


                                    Japt, 31 bytes



                                    ËcUî
                                    ËéEÃÕc¡XéYnÃÕ mf fÊk_eZâÃl


                                    Try all test cases



                                    Explanation:



                                    Ëc                            #Pad each row...
                                    Uî #With a number of 0s equal to the number of rows

                                    ËéEÃÕ #Get the anti-diagonals:
                                    ËéEÃ # Rotate each row right a number of times equal to the row's index
                                    Õ # Get the resulting columns
                                    c #Add to that...
                                    ¡XéYnÃÕ #The diagonals:
                                    ¡XéYnà # Rotate each row left a number of times equal to the row's index
                                    Õ # Get the resulting columns
                                    mf #Remove the 0s from each diagonal
                                    fÊ #Remove the all-0 diagonals
                                    k_ Ã #Remove the ones where:
                                    eZâ # The list contains no duplicates
                                    l #Return the number of remaining diagonals


                                    I also tried a version based on Kirill L.'s Haskell answer, but couldn't find a good way to "group by a function of the X and Y indices" and the alternative I found wasn't good enough.






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$













                                    • $begingroup$
                                      31 bytes
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Shaggy
                                      Jan 26 at 21:38
















                                    5












                                    $begingroup$


                                    Japt, 31 bytes



                                    ËcUî
                                    ËéEÃÕc¡XéYnÃÕ mf fÊk_eZâÃl


                                    Try all test cases



                                    Explanation:



                                    Ëc                            #Pad each row...
                                    Uî #With a number of 0s equal to the number of rows

                                    ËéEÃÕ #Get the anti-diagonals:
                                    ËéEÃ # Rotate each row right a number of times equal to the row's index
                                    Õ # Get the resulting columns
                                    c #Add to that...
                                    ¡XéYnÃÕ #The diagonals:
                                    ¡XéYnà # Rotate each row left a number of times equal to the row's index
                                    Õ # Get the resulting columns
                                    mf #Remove the 0s from each diagonal
                                    fÊ #Remove the all-0 diagonals
                                    k_ Ã #Remove the ones where:
                                    eZâ # The list contains no duplicates
                                    l #Return the number of remaining diagonals


                                    I also tried a version based on Kirill L.'s Haskell answer, but couldn't find a good way to "group by a function of the X and Y indices" and the alternative I found wasn't good enough.






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$













                                    • $begingroup$
                                      31 bytes
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Shaggy
                                      Jan 26 at 21:38














                                    5












                                    5








                                    5





                                    $begingroup$


                                    Japt, 31 bytes



                                    ËcUî
                                    ËéEÃÕc¡XéYnÃÕ mf fÊk_eZâÃl


                                    Try all test cases



                                    Explanation:



                                    Ëc                            #Pad each row...
                                    Uî #With a number of 0s equal to the number of rows

                                    ËéEÃÕ #Get the anti-diagonals:
                                    ËéEÃ # Rotate each row right a number of times equal to the row's index
                                    Õ # Get the resulting columns
                                    c #Add to that...
                                    ¡XéYnÃÕ #The diagonals:
                                    ¡XéYnà # Rotate each row left a number of times equal to the row's index
                                    Õ # Get the resulting columns
                                    mf #Remove the 0s from each diagonal
                                    fÊ #Remove the all-0 diagonals
                                    k_ Ã #Remove the ones where:
                                    eZâ # The list contains no duplicates
                                    l #Return the number of remaining diagonals


                                    I also tried a version based on Kirill L.'s Haskell answer, but couldn't find a good way to "group by a function of the X and Y indices" and the alternative I found wasn't good enough.






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$




                                    Japt, 31 bytes



                                    ËcUî
                                    ËéEÃÕc¡XéYnÃÕ mf fÊk_eZâÃl


                                    Try all test cases



                                    Explanation:



                                    Ëc                            #Pad each row...
                                    Uî #With a number of 0s equal to the number of rows

                                    ËéEÃÕ #Get the anti-diagonals:
                                    ËéEÃ # Rotate each row right a number of times equal to the row's index
                                    Õ # Get the resulting columns
                                    c #Add to that...
                                    ¡XéYnÃÕ #The diagonals:
                                    ¡XéYnà # Rotate each row left a number of times equal to the row's index
                                    Õ # Get the resulting columns
                                    mf #Remove the 0s from each diagonal
                                    fÊ #Remove the all-0 diagonals
                                    k_ Ã #Remove the ones where:
                                    eZâ # The list contains no duplicates
                                    l #Return the number of remaining diagonals


                                    I also tried a version based on Kirill L.'s Haskell answer, but couldn't find a good way to "group by a function of the X and Y indices" and the alternative I found wasn't good enough.







                                    share|improve this answer














                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer








                                    edited Jan 27 at 2:25

























                                    answered Jan 25 at 17:40









                                    Kamil DrakariKamil Drakari

                                    3,391417




                                    3,391417












                                    • $begingroup$
                                      31 bytes
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Shaggy
                                      Jan 26 at 21:38


















                                    • $begingroup$
                                      31 bytes
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Shaggy
                                      Jan 26 at 21:38
















                                    $begingroup$
                                    31 bytes
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Shaggy
                                    Jan 26 at 21:38




                                    $begingroup$
                                    31 bytes
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Shaggy
                                    Jan 26 at 21:38











                                    4












                                    $begingroup$

                                    JavaScript (ES6),  107 105 101  98 bytes





                                    f=(m,d=s=1)=>(m+0)[s-=~d/2]?m.some(o=(r,y)=>!r.every((v,x)=>x+d*y+m.length-s?1:o[v]^=1))+f(m,-d):0


                                    Try it online!



                                    Note



                                    The way this code is golfed, the anti-diagonal consisting of the sole bottom-left cell is never tested. That's OK because it can't possibly contain duplicated values.



                                    Commented



                                    f = (                    // f = recursive function taking:
                                    m, // m = input matrix
                                    d = // d = direction (1 for anti-diagonal or -1 for diagonal)
                                    s = 1 // s = expected diagonal ID, which is defined as either the sum
                                    ) => // or the difference of x and y + the length of a row
                                    (m + 0)[ //
                                    s -= ~d / 2 // increment s if d = -1 or leave it unchanged otherwise
                                    ] ? // if s is less than twice the total number of cells:
                                    m.some(o = // o = object used to store encountered values in this diagonal
                                    (r, y) => // for each row r at position y in m:
                                    !r.every((v, x) => // for each cell of value v at position x in r:
                                    x + d * y + // x + d * y + m.length is the ID of the diagonal
                                    m.length - s ? // if it's not equal to the one we're looking for:
                                    1 // yield 1
                                    : // else:
                                    o[v] ^= 1 // toggle o[v]; if it's equal to 0, v is a duplicate and
                                    // every() fails which -- in turn -- makes some() succeed
                                    ) // end of every()
                                    ) // end of some()
                                    + f(m, -d) // add the result of a recursive call in the opposite direction
                                    : // else:
                                    0 // stop recursion





                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$


















                                      4












                                      $begingroup$

                                      JavaScript (ES6),  107 105 101  98 bytes





                                      f=(m,d=s=1)=>(m+0)[s-=~d/2]?m.some(o=(r,y)=>!r.every((v,x)=>x+d*y+m.length-s?1:o[v]^=1))+f(m,-d):0


                                      Try it online!



                                      Note



                                      The way this code is golfed, the anti-diagonal consisting of the sole bottom-left cell is never tested. That's OK because it can't possibly contain duplicated values.



                                      Commented



                                      f = (                    // f = recursive function taking:
                                      m, // m = input matrix
                                      d = // d = direction (1 for anti-diagonal or -1 for diagonal)
                                      s = 1 // s = expected diagonal ID, which is defined as either the sum
                                      ) => // or the difference of x and y + the length of a row
                                      (m + 0)[ //
                                      s -= ~d / 2 // increment s if d = -1 or leave it unchanged otherwise
                                      ] ? // if s is less than twice the total number of cells:
                                      m.some(o = // o = object used to store encountered values in this diagonal
                                      (r, y) => // for each row r at position y in m:
                                      !r.every((v, x) => // for each cell of value v at position x in r:
                                      x + d * y + // x + d * y + m.length is the ID of the diagonal
                                      m.length - s ? // if it's not equal to the one we're looking for:
                                      1 // yield 1
                                      : // else:
                                      o[v] ^= 1 // toggle o[v]; if it's equal to 0, v is a duplicate and
                                      // every() fails which -- in turn -- makes some() succeed
                                      ) // end of every()
                                      ) // end of some()
                                      + f(m, -d) // add the result of a recursive call in the opposite direction
                                      : // else:
                                      0 // stop recursion





                                      share|improve this answer











                                      $endgroup$
















                                        4












                                        4








                                        4





                                        $begingroup$

                                        JavaScript (ES6),  107 105 101  98 bytes





                                        f=(m,d=s=1)=>(m+0)[s-=~d/2]?m.some(o=(r,y)=>!r.every((v,x)=>x+d*y+m.length-s?1:o[v]^=1))+f(m,-d):0


                                        Try it online!



                                        Note



                                        The way this code is golfed, the anti-diagonal consisting of the sole bottom-left cell is never tested. That's OK because it can't possibly contain duplicated values.



                                        Commented



                                        f = (                    // f = recursive function taking:
                                        m, // m = input matrix
                                        d = // d = direction (1 for anti-diagonal or -1 for diagonal)
                                        s = 1 // s = expected diagonal ID, which is defined as either the sum
                                        ) => // or the difference of x and y + the length of a row
                                        (m + 0)[ //
                                        s -= ~d / 2 // increment s if d = -1 or leave it unchanged otherwise
                                        ] ? // if s is less than twice the total number of cells:
                                        m.some(o = // o = object used to store encountered values in this diagonal
                                        (r, y) => // for each row r at position y in m:
                                        !r.every((v, x) => // for each cell of value v at position x in r:
                                        x + d * y + // x + d * y + m.length is the ID of the diagonal
                                        m.length - s ? // if it's not equal to the one we're looking for:
                                        1 // yield 1
                                        : // else:
                                        o[v] ^= 1 // toggle o[v]; if it's equal to 0, v is a duplicate and
                                        // every() fails which -- in turn -- makes some() succeed
                                        ) // end of every()
                                        ) // end of some()
                                        + f(m, -d) // add the result of a recursive call in the opposite direction
                                        : // else:
                                        0 // stop recursion





                                        share|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$



                                        JavaScript (ES6),  107 105 101  98 bytes





                                        f=(m,d=s=1)=>(m+0)[s-=~d/2]?m.some(o=(r,y)=>!r.every((v,x)=>x+d*y+m.length-s?1:o[v]^=1))+f(m,-d):0


                                        Try it online!



                                        Note



                                        The way this code is golfed, the anti-diagonal consisting of the sole bottom-left cell is never tested. That's OK because it can't possibly contain duplicated values.



                                        Commented



                                        f = (                    // f = recursive function taking:
                                        m, // m = input matrix
                                        d = // d = direction (1 for anti-diagonal or -1 for diagonal)
                                        s = 1 // s = expected diagonal ID, which is defined as either the sum
                                        ) => // or the difference of x and y + the length of a row
                                        (m + 0)[ //
                                        s -= ~d / 2 // increment s if d = -1 or leave it unchanged otherwise
                                        ] ? // if s is less than twice the total number of cells:
                                        m.some(o = // o = object used to store encountered values in this diagonal
                                        (r, y) => // for each row r at position y in m:
                                        !r.every((v, x) => // for each cell of value v at position x in r:
                                        x + d * y + // x + d * y + m.length is the ID of the diagonal
                                        m.length - s ? // if it's not equal to the one we're looking for:
                                        1 // yield 1
                                        : // else:
                                        o[v] ^= 1 // toggle o[v]; if it's equal to 0, v is a duplicate and
                                        // every() fails which -- in turn -- makes some() succeed
                                        ) // end of every()
                                        ) // end of some()
                                        + f(m, -d) // add the result of a recursive call in the opposite direction
                                        : // else:
                                        0 // stop recursion






                                        share|improve this answer














                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer








                                        edited Jan 25 at 17:22

























                                        answered Jan 25 at 12:37









                                        ArnauldArnauld

                                        76.2k693320




                                        76.2k693320























                                            4












                                            $begingroup$


                                            05AB1E, 25 bytes



                                            í‚εεygÅ0«NFÁ]€ø`«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g


                                            Try it online!
                                            or as a Test Suite



                                            Explanation



                                            í                          # reverse each row in input
                                            ‚ # and pair with the input
                                            ε # for each matrix
                                            ε # for each row in the matrix
                                            ygÅ0« # append len(row) zeroes
                                            NFÁ # and rotate it index(row) elements to the right
                                            ] # end loops
                                            €ø # transpose each matrix
                                            `« # append them together
                                            ʒ } # filter, keep only rows that
                                            0K # when zeroes are removed
                                            DÙÊ # are not equal to themselves without duplicate values
                                            g # push length of the result


                                            I feel like I've missed something here.

                                            Need to try and golf this more later.






                                            share|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$









                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              Doesn't help at all, but rotate N left would be N._ now. So í‚εεygÅ0«N._] also works. Can also remove the flatten with this new change... still no byte savings though: í‚vyεygÅ0«N._}ø}«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Magic Octopus Urn
                                              Jan 29 at 19:45








                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              @MagicOctopusUrn: Interesting. I had missed that command. Only a left though. Thats weird.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Emigna
                                              Jan 29 at 21:24






                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              @Emigna You can go right with N(._ I guess, but your NFÁ} is the same length, and even shorter in this case due to ] closing the loop and maps simultaneously. Overall the use of ._ is only useful when going left to save 1 byte, in comparison to NFÀ}.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Kevin Cruijssen
                                              Jan 31 at 8:26










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              @KevinCruijssen: Ah, cool. Although as you say, not very useful.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Emigna
                                              Jan 31 at 8:59
















                                            4












                                            $begingroup$


                                            05AB1E, 25 bytes



                                            í‚εεygÅ0«NFÁ]€ø`«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g


                                            Try it online!
                                            or as a Test Suite



                                            Explanation



                                            í                          # reverse each row in input
                                            ‚ # and pair with the input
                                            ε # for each matrix
                                            ε # for each row in the matrix
                                            ygÅ0« # append len(row) zeroes
                                            NFÁ # and rotate it index(row) elements to the right
                                            ] # end loops
                                            €ø # transpose each matrix
                                            `« # append them together
                                            ʒ } # filter, keep only rows that
                                            0K # when zeroes are removed
                                            DÙÊ # are not equal to themselves without duplicate values
                                            g # push length of the result


                                            I feel like I've missed something here.

                                            Need to try and golf this more later.






                                            share|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$









                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              Doesn't help at all, but rotate N left would be N._ now. So í‚εεygÅ0«N._] also works. Can also remove the flatten with this new change... still no byte savings though: í‚vyεygÅ0«N._}ø}«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Magic Octopus Urn
                                              Jan 29 at 19:45








                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              @MagicOctopusUrn: Interesting. I had missed that command. Only a left though. Thats weird.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Emigna
                                              Jan 29 at 21:24






                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              @Emigna You can go right with N(._ I guess, but your NFÁ} is the same length, and even shorter in this case due to ] closing the loop and maps simultaneously. Overall the use of ._ is only useful when going left to save 1 byte, in comparison to NFÀ}.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Kevin Cruijssen
                                              Jan 31 at 8:26










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              @KevinCruijssen: Ah, cool. Although as you say, not very useful.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Emigna
                                              Jan 31 at 8:59














                                            4












                                            4








                                            4





                                            $begingroup$


                                            05AB1E, 25 bytes



                                            í‚εεygÅ0«NFÁ]€ø`«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g


                                            Try it online!
                                            or as a Test Suite



                                            Explanation



                                            í                          # reverse each row in input
                                            ‚ # and pair with the input
                                            ε # for each matrix
                                            ε # for each row in the matrix
                                            ygÅ0« # append len(row) zeroes
                                            NFÁ # and rotate it index(row) elements to the right
                                            ] # end loops
                                            €ø # transpose each matrix
                                            `« # append them together
                                            ʒ } # filter, keep only rows that
                                            0K # when zeroes are removed
                                            DÙÊ # are not equal to themselves without duplicate values
                                            g # push length of the result


                                            I feel like I've missed something here.

                                            Need to try and golf this more later.






                                            share|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$




                                            05AB1E, 25 bytes



                                            í‚εεygÅ0«NFÁ]€ø`«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g


                                            Try it online!
                                            or as a Test Suite



                                            Explanation



                                            í                          # reverse each row in input
                                            ‚ # and pair with the input
                                            ε # for each matrix
                                            ε # for each row in the matrix
                                            ygÅ0« # append len(row) zeroes
                                            NFÁ # and rotate it index(row) elements to the right
                                            ] # end loops
                                            €ø # transpose each matrix
                                            `« # append them together
                                            ʒ } # filter, keep only rows that
                                            0K # when zeroes are removed
                                            DÙÊ # are not equal to themselves without duplicate values
                                            g # push length of the result


                                            I feel like I've missed something here.

                                            Need to try and golf this more later.







                                            share|improve this answer














                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer








                                            edited Jan 25 at 21:07

























                                            answered Jan 25 at 15:06









                                            EmignaEmigna

                                            46.3k432141




                                            46.3k432141








                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              Doesn't help at all, but rotate N left would be N._ now. So í‚εεygÅ0«N._] also works. Can also remove the flatten with this new change... still no byte savings though: í‚vyεygÅ0«N._}ø}«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Magic Octopus Urn
                                              Jan 29 at 19:45








                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              @MagicOctopusUrn: Interesting. I had missed that command. Only a left though. Thats weird.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Emigna
                                              Jan 29 at 21:24






                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              @Emigna You can go right with N(._ I guess, but your NFÁ} is the same length, and even shorter in this case due to ] closing the loop and maps simultaneously. Overall the use of ._ is only useful when going left to save 1 byte, in comparison to NFÀ}.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Kevin Cruijssen
                                              Jan 31 at 8:26










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              @KevinCruijssen: Ah, cool. Although as you say, not very useful.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Emigna
                                              Jan 31 at 8:59














                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              Doesn't help at all, but rotate N left would be N._ now. So í‚εεygÅ0«N._] also works. Can also remove the flatten with this new change... still no byte savings though: í‚vyεygÅ0«N._}ø}«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Magic Octopus Urn
                                              Jan 29 at 19:45








                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              @MagicOctopusUrn: Interesting. I had missed that command. Only a left though. Thats weird.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Emigna
                                              Jan 29 at 21:24






                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              @Emigna You can go right with N(._ I guess, but your NFÁ} is the same length, and even shorter in this case due to ] closing the loop and maps simultaneously. Overall the use of ._ is only useful when going left to save 1 byte, in comparison to NFÀ}.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Kevin Cruijssen
                                              Jan 31 at 8:26










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              @KevinCruijssen: Ah, cool. Although as you say, not very useful.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Emigna
                                              Jan 31 at 8:59








                                            1




                                            1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            Doesn't help at all, but rotate N left would be N._ now. So í‚εεygÅ0«N._] also works. Can also remove the flatten with this new change... still no byte savings though: í‚vyεygÅ0«N._}ø}«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Magic Octopus Urn
                                            Jan 29 at 19:45






                                            $begingroup$
                                            Doesn't help at all, but rotate N left would be N._ now. So í‚εεygÅ0«N._] also works. Can also remove the flatten with this new change... still no byte savings though: í‚vyεygÅ0«N._}ø}«ʒ0KDÙÊ}g
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Magic Octopus Urn
                                            Jan 29 at 19:45






                                            1




                                            1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            @MagicOctopusUrn: Interesting. I had missed that command. Only a left though. Thats weird.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Emigna
                                            Jan 29 at 21:24




                                            $begingroup$
                                            @MagicOctopusUrn: Interesting. I had missed that command. Only a left though. Thats weird.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Emigna
                                            Jan 29 at 21:24




                                            1




                                            1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            @Emigna You can go right with N(._ I guess, but your NFÁ} is the same length, and even shorter in this case due to ] closing the loop and maps simultaneously. Overall the use of ._ is only useful when going left to save 1 byte, in comparison to NFÀ}.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Kevin Cruijssen
                                            Jan 31 at 8:26




                                            $begingroup$
                                            @Emigna You can go right with N(._ I guess, but your NFÁ} is the same length, and even shorter in this case due to ] closing the loop and maps simultaneously. Overall the use of ._ is only useful when going left to save 1 byte, in comparison to NFÀ}.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Kevin Cruijssen
                                            Jan 31 at 8:26












                                            $begingroup$
                                            @KevinCruijssen: Ah, cool. Although as you say, not very useful.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Emigna
                                            Jan 31 at 8:59




                                            $begingroup$
                                            @KevinCruijssen: Ah, cool. Although as you say, not very useful.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Emigna
                                            Jan 31 at 8:59











                                            3












                                            $begingroup$


                                            Python 2, 144 136 bytes





                                            lambda m:sum(l(set(d))<l(d)for d in[[r[i*x+o]for i,r in enumerate(m)if-1<i*x+o<l(r)]for o in range(-l(`m`),l(`m`))for x in[-1,1]])
                                            l=len


                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$


















                                              3












                                              $begingroup$


                                              Python 2, 144 136 bytes





                                              lambda m:sum(l(set(d))<l(d)for d in[[r[i*x+o]for i,r in enumerate(m)if-1<i*x+o<l(r)]for o in range(-l(`m`),l(`m`))for x in[-1,1]])
                                              l=len


                                              Try it online!






                                              share|improve this answer











                                              $endgroup$
















                                                3












                                                3








                                                3





                                                $begingroup$


                                                Python 2, 144 136 bytes





                                                lambda m:sum(l(set(d))<l(d)for d in[[r[i*x+o]for i,r in enumerate(m)if-1<i*x+o<l(r)]for o in range(-l(`m`),l(`m`))for x in[-1,1]])
                                                l=len


                                                Try it online!






                                                share|improve this answer











                                                $endgroup$




                                                Python 2, 144 136 bytes





                                                lambda m:sum(l(set(d))<l(d)for d in[[r[i*x+o]for i,r in enumerate(m)if-1<i*x+o<l(r)]for o in range(-l(`m`),l(`m`))for x in[-1,1]])
                                                l=len


                                                Try it online!







                                                share|improve this answer














                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer








                                                edited Jan 25 at 11:52

























                                                answered Jan 25 at 10:57









                                                TFeldTFeld

                                                15.2k21245




                                                15.2k21245























                                                    3












                                                    $begingroup$


                                                    Octave, 98 bytes





                                                    @(A)nnz([(q=@(Q)arrayfun(@(n)nnz(z=diag(Q,n))-nnz(unique(z)),-([m,n]=size(Q)):n))(A),q(rot90(A))])


                                                    Try it online!






                                                    share|improve this answer









                                                    $endgroup$









                                                    • 1




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      Are arrays indeed fun? ;p
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                      Jan 25 at 14:28










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      And thanks for preparing the test cases in Octave format!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Luis Mendo
                                                      Jan 26 at 1:05






                                                    • 2




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      @KevinCruijssen Not just arrays! You can have cellfun too, and for the masochistic, structfun as well. In Octave, it's either a for-loop or having fun!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Sanchises
                                                      Jan 26 at 7:06










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      And don’t forget b-sx-fun!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Luis Mendo
                                                      Jan 26 at 10:24
















                                                    3












                                                    $begingroup$


                                                    Octave, 98 bytes





                                                    @(A)nnz([(q=@(Q)arrayfun(@(n)nnz(z=diag(Q,n))-nnz(unique(z)),-([m,n]=size(Q)):n))(A),q(rot90(A))])


                                                    Try it online!






                                                    share|improve this answer









                                                    $endgroup$









                                                    • 1




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      Are arrays indeed fun? ;p
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                      Jan 25 at 14:28










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      And thanks for preparing the test cases in Octave format!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Luis Mendo
                                                      Jan 26 at 1:05






                                                    • 2




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      @KevinCruijssen Not just arrays! You can have cellfun too, and for the masochistic, structfun as well. In Octave, it's either a for-loop or having fun!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Sanchises
                                                      Jan 26 at 7:06










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      And don’t forget b-sx-fun!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Luis Mendo
                                                      Jan 26 at 10:24














                                                    3












                                                    3








                                                    3





                                                    $begingroup$


                                                    Octave, 98 bytes





                                                    @(A)nnz([(q=@(Q)arrayfun(@(n)nnz(z=diag(Q,n))-nnz(unique(z)),-([m,n]=size(Q)):n))(A),q(rot90(A))])


                                                    Try it online!






                                                    share|improve this answer









                                                    $endgroup$




                                                    Octave, 98 bytes





                                                    @(A)nnz([(q=@(Q)arrayfun(@(n)nnz(z=diag(Q,n))-nnz(unique(z)),-([m,n]=size(Q)):n))(A),q(rot90(A))])


                                                    Try it online!







                                                    share|improve this answer












                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                    share|improve this answer










                                                    answered Jan 25 at 14:20









                                                    SanchisesSanchises

                                                    5,89212351




                                                    5,89212351








                                                    • 1




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      Are arrays indeed fun? ;p
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                      Jan 25 at 14:28










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      And thanks for preparing the test cases in Octave format!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Luis Mendo
                                                      Jan 26 at 1:05






                                                    • 2




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      @KevinCruijssen Not just arrays! You can have cellfun too, and for the masochistic, structfun as well. In Octave, it's either a for-loop or having fun!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Sanchises
                                                      Jan 26 at 7:06










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      And don’t forget b-sx-fun!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Luis Mendo
                                                      Jan 26 at 10:24














                                                    • 1




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      Are arrays indeed fun? ;p
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                      Jan 25 at 14:28










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      And thanks for preparing the test cases in Octave format!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Luis Mendo
                                                      Jan 26 at 1:05






                                                    • 2




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      @KevinCruijssen Not just arrays! You can have cellfun too, and for the masochistic, structfun as well. In Octave, it's either a for-loop or having fun!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Sanchises
                                                      Jan 26 at 7:06










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      And don’t forget b-sx-fun!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Luis Mendo
                                                      Jan 26 at 10:24








                                                    1




                                                    1




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    Are arrays indeed fun? ;p
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                    Jan 25 at 14:28




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    Are arrays indeed fun? ;p
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                    Jan 25 at 14:28












                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    And thanks for preparing the test cases in Octave format!
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Luis Mendo
                                                    Jan 26 at 1:05




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    And thanks for preparing the test cases in Octave format!
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Luis Mendo
                                                    Jan 26 at 1:05




                                                    2




                                                    2




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    @KevinCruijssen Not just arrays! You can have cellfun too, and for the masochistic, structfun as well. In Octave, it's either a for-loop or having fun!
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Sanchises
                                                    Jan 26 at 7:06




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    @KevinCruijssen Not just arrays! You can have cellfun too, and for the masochistic, structfun as well. In Octave, it's either a for-loop or having fun!
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Sanchises
                                                    Jan 26 at 7:06












                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    And don’t forget b-sx-fun!
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Luis Mendo
                                                    Jan 26 at 10:24




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    And don’t forget b-sx-fun!
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Luis Mendo
                                                    Jan 26 at 10:24











                                                    3












                                                    $begingroup$

                                                    Haskell, 118 112 bytes



                                                    import Data.List
                                                    r#(a:b)=sum[1|(/=)=<<nub$[h|h:_<-a:r]]+[t|_:t<-a:r]#b
                                                    #_=0
                                                    a#_=a#[]
                                                    h x=#x+#(reverse x)


                                                    Try it online!



                                                    r#(a:b)                      -- function '#' calculates the ant-diagonals of a matrix
                                                    -- where 'a' is the first row and 'b' all the others
                                                    -- as we recursively walk down the rows of the matrix,
                                                    -- 'r' holds the rows from before with the respective
                                                    -- head dropped
                                                    --
                                                    [h|h:_<-a:r] -- if the heads of the the current row and the rows
                                                    -- before
                                                    (/=)=<<nub$ -- contain duplicates
                                                    [1| ] -- make a singleton list [1] (else the empty list)
                                                    sum -- and take the sum thereof
                                                    + -- and add
                                                    # -- a recursive call with
                                                    [t|_:t<-a:r] -- the tails of the current row and the rows before
                                                    b -- and the rows below
                                                    --
                                                    #_=0 -- base case if there aren't any tails anymore, return 0
                                                    a#_=a#[] -- if there are tails, but no further rows below,
                                                    -- continue with tails

                                                    h x=#x+#(reverse x) -- main function, call '#' with input matrix 'x'
                                                    -- and the reverse of it to get the number of diagonals
                                                    -- and anti-diagonals. Recursion starts with no
                                                    -- rows before the 1st row.

                                                    -- example trace of function '#'
                                                    -- input matrix:
                                                    -- [[1,2,3,4],
                                                    -- [5,6,7,8],
                                                    -- [9,9,9,9]]
                                                    --
                                                    -- | r a b a:r heads tails (r of next call)
                                                    -- -+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    -- 1| [1,2,3,4] [[5,6,7,8], [[1,2,3,4]] [1] [[2,3,4]]
                                                    -- | [9,9,9,9]]
                                                    -- |
                                                    -- 2| [[2,3,4]] [5,6,7,8] [[9,9,9,9]] [[5,6,7,8], [5,2] [[6,7,8],
                                                    -- | [2,3,4 ]] [3,4 ]]
                                                    -- |
                                                    -- 3| [[6,7,8], [9,9,9,9] [[9,9,9,9], [9,6,3] [[9,9,9],
                                                    -- | [3,4 ]] [6,7,8 ], [7,8 ]
                                                    -- | [3,4 ], [4 ]
                                                    -- |
                                                    -- | ....





                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                    $endgroup$


















                                                      3












                                                      $begingroup$

                                                      Haskell, 118 112 bytes



                                                      import Data.List
                                                      r#(a:b)=sum[1|(/=)=<<nub$[h|h:_<-a:r]]+[t|_:t<-a:r]#b
                                                      #_=0
                                                      a#_=a#[]
                                                      h x=#x+#(reverse x)


                                                      Try it online!



                                                      r#(a:b)                      -- function '#' calculates the ant-diagonals of a matrix
                                                      -- where 'a' is the first row and 'b' all the others
                                                      -- as we recursively walk down the rows of the matrix,
                                                      -- 'r' holds the rows from before with the respective
                                                      -- head dropped
                                                      --
                                                      [h|h:_<-a:r] -- if the heads of the the current row and the rows
                                                      -- before
                                                      (/=)=<<nub$ -- contain duplicates
                                                      [1| ] -- make a singleton list [1] (else the empty list)
                                                      sum -- and take the sum thereof
                                                      + -- and add
                                                      # -- a recursive call with
                                                      [t|_:t<-a:r] -- the tails of the current row and the rows before
                                                      b -- and the rows below
                                                      --
                                                      #_=0 -- base case if there aren't any tails anymore, return 0
                                                      a#_=a#[] -- if there are tails, but no further rows below,
                                                      -- continue with tails

                                                      h x=#x+#(reverse x) -- main function, call '#' with input matrix 'x'
                                                      -- and the reverse of it to get the number of diagonals
                                                      -- and anti-diagonals. Recursion starts with no
                                                      -- rows before the 1st row.

                                                      -- example trace of function '#'
                                                      -- input matrix:
                                                      -- [[1,2,3,4],
                                                      -- [5,6,7,8],
                                                      -- [9,9,9,9]]
                                                      --
                                                      -- | r a b a:r heads tails (r of next call)
                                                      -- -+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      -- 1| [1,2,3,4] [[5,6,7,8], [[1,2,3,4]] [1] [[2,3,4]]
                                                      -- | [9,9,9,9]]
                                                      -- |
                                                      -- 2| [[2,3,4]] [5,6,7,8] [[9,9,9,9]] [[5,6,7,8], [5,2] [[6,7,8],
                                                      -- | [2,3,4 ]] [3,4 ]]
                                                      -- |
                                                      -- 3| [[6,7,8], [9,9,9,9] [[9,9,9,9], [9,6,3] [[9,9,9],
                                                      -- | [3,4 ]] [6,7,8 ], [7,8 ]
                                                      -- | [3,4 ], [4 ]
                                                      -- |
                                                      -- | ....





                                                      share|improve this answer











                                                      $endgroup$
















                                                        3












                                                        3








                                                        3





                                                        $begingroup$

                                                        Haskell, 118 112 bytes



                                                        import Data.List
                                                        r#(a:b)=sum[1|(/=)=<<nub$[h|h:_<-a:r]]+[t|_:t<-a:r]#b
                                                        #_=0
                                                        a#_=a#[]
                                                        h x=#x+#(reverse x)


                                                        Try it online!



                                                        r#(a:b)                      -- function '#' calculates the ant-diagonals of a matrix
                                                        -- where 'a' is the first row and 'b' all the others
                                                        -- as we recursively walk down the rows of the matrix,
                                                        -- 'r' holds the rows from before with the respective
                                                        -- head dropped
                                                        --
                                                        [h|h:_<-a:r] -- if the heads of the the current row and the rows
                                                        -- before
                                                        (/=)=<<nub$ -- contain duplicates
                                                        [1| ] -- make a singleton list [1] (else the empty list)
                                                        sum -- and take the sum thereof
                                                        + -- and add
                                                        # -- a recursive call with
                                                        [t|_:t<-a:r] -- the tails of the current row and the rows before
                                                        b -- and the rows below
                                                        --
                                                        #_=0 -- base case if there aren't any tails anymore, return 0
                                                        a#_=a#[] -- if there are tails, but no further rows below,
                                                        -- continue with tails

                                                        h x=#x+#(reverse x) -- main function, call '#' with input matrix 'x'
                                                        -- and the reverse of it to get the number of diagonals
                                                        -- and anti-diagonals. Recursion starts with no
                                                        -- rows before the 1st row.

                                                        -- example trace of function '#'
                                                        -- input matrix:
                                                        -- [[1,2,3,4],
                                                        -- [5,6,7,8],
                                                        -- [9,9,9,9]]
                                                        --
                                                        -- | r a b a:r heads tails (r of next call)
                                                        -- -+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        -- 1| [1,2,3,4] [[5,6,7,8], [[1,2,3,4]] [1] [[2,3,4]]
                                                        -- | [9,9,9,9]]
                                                        -- |
                                                        -- 2| [[2,3,4]] [5,6,7,8] [[9,9,9,9]] [[5,6,7,8], [5,2] [[6,7,8],
                                                        -- | [2,3,4 ]] [3,4 ]]
                                                        -- |
                                                        -- 3| [[6,7,8], [9,9,9,9] [[9,9,9,9], [9,6,3] [[9,9,9],
                                                        -- | [3,4 ]] [6,7,8 ], [7,8 ]
                                                        -- | [3,4 ], [4 ]
                                                        -- |
                                                        -- | ....





                                                        share|improve this answer











                                                        $endgroup$



                                                        Haskell, 118 112 bytes



                                                        import Data.List
                                                        r#(a:b)=sum[1|(/=)=<<nub$[h|h:_<-a:r]]+[t|_:t<-a:r]#b
                                                        #_=0
                                                        a#_=a#[]
                                                        h x=#x+#(reverse x)


                                                        Try it online!



                                                        r#(a:b)                      -- function '#' calculates the ant-diagonals of a matrix
                                                        -- where 'a' is the first row and 'b' all the others
                                                        -- as we recursively walk down the rows of the matrix,
                                                        -- 'r' holds the rows from before with the respective
                                                        -- head dropped
                                                        --
                                                        [h|h:_<-a:r] -- if the heads of the the current row and the rows
                                                        -- before
                                                        (/=)=<<nub$ -- contain duplicates
                                                        [1| ] -- make a singleton list [1] (else the empty list)
                                                        sum -- and take the sum thereof
                                                        + -- and add
                                                        # -- a recursive call with
                                                        [t|_:t<-a:r] -- the tails of the current row and the rows before
                                                        b -- and the rows below
                                                        --
                                                        #_=0 -- base case if there aren't any tails anymore, return 0
                                                        a#_=a#[] -- if there are tails, but no further rows below,
                                                        -- continue with tails

                                                        h x=#x+#(reverse x) -- main function, call '#' with input matrix 'x'
                                                        -- and the reverse of it to get the number of diagonals
                                                        -- and anti-diagonals. Recursion starts with no
                                                        -- rows before the 1st row.

                                                        -- example trace of function '#'
                                                        -- input matrix:
                                                        -- [[1,2,3,4],
                                                        -- [5,6,7,8],
                                                        -- [9,9,9,9]]
                                                        --
                                                        -- | r a b a:r heads tails (r of next call)
                                                        -- -+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        -- 1| [1,2,3,4] [[5,6,7,8], [[1,2,3,4]] [1] [[2,3,4]]
                                                        -- | [9,9,9,9]]
                                                        -- |
                                                        -- 2| [[2,3,4]] [5,6,7,8] [[9,9,9,9]] [[5,6,7,8], [5,2] [[6,7,8],
                                                        -- | [2,3,4 ]] [3,4 ]]
                                                        -- |
                                                        -- 3| [[6,7,8], [9,9,9,9] [[9,9,9,9], [9,6,3] [[9,9,9],
                                                        -- | [3,4 ]] [6,7,8 ], [7,8 ]
                                                        -- | [3,4 ], [4 ]
                                                        -- |
                                                        -- | ....






                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                        edited Jan 28 at 23:57

























                                                        answered Jan 27 at 1:58









                                                        niminimi

                                                        31.8k32285




                                                        31.8k32285























                                                            2












                                                            $begingroup$


                                                            Charcoal, 61 56 53 bytes



                                                            F²FLθFL§θ⁰F⟦⁻κ×⊖⊗ιλ⟧⊞υ⊞O⎇∧λ﹪⁺μιLθ⊟υ⟦⟧§§θμλILΦυ⊙ι‹⌕ιλμ


                                                            Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                            F²


                                                            Loop over forward and reverse diagonals; i=0 represents forward diagonals while i=1 represents reverse diagonals.



                                                            FLθ


                                                            Loop over each row index. This represents the index of the start of the diagonal.



                                                            FL§θ⁰«


                                                            Loop over each column index.



                                                            F⟦⁻κ×⊖⊗ιλ⟧


                                                            Calculate the row index of the diagonal at this column index. I use a for loop over a single-element array instead of an assignment as this avoids having to wrap the assignment into a block with the following statement, thus saving a byte.



                                                            ⎇∧λ﹪⁺μιLθ


                                                            Check whether this is the first column or the diagonal is about to wrap around between bottom and top.



                                                            ⊟υ


                                                            If it isn't then pop the last list from the list of lists.



                                                            ⟦⟧


                                                            if it is then start a new empty list.



                                                            ⊞O...§§θμλ


                                                            Add the current diagonal entry to that list.



                                                            ⊞υ


                                                            And push that list (back) to the list of lists.



                                                            ILΦυ⊙ι‹⌕ιλμ


                                                            Count the number of lists that contain duplicates.



                                                            Let's take an example when i=0 and k=1. This means that we've already collected two diagonals, [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5]]. Here's our input:



                                                             1 8 4 2 9 4 4 4
                                                            [5]1 2 7 7 4 2 3
                                                            1 4 5 2 4 2 3 8
                                                            8 5 4 2 3 4 1 5


                                                            We then loop l from 0 to 7. This advances both the row and column by 1 each time:



                                                             1 8 4 2 9 4 4 4
                                                            [5]1 2 7 7 4 2 3
                                                            1[4]5 2 4 2 3 8
                                                            8 5[4]2 3 4 1 5


                                                            The list is now [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4]]. However when l is 3, we have k+l=4, a multiple of the height of the array. This means that we need to start a new list: [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],]. We then continue to collect diagonal elements:



                                                             1 8 4[2]9 4 4 4
                                                            [5]1 2 7[7]4 2 3
                                                            1[4]5 2 4[2]3 8
                                                            8 5[4]2 3 4[1]5


                                                            The list is now [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],[2,7,2,1]]. Now when l is 7, we have k+l=8, another multiple of the height of the array. This means that we need to start a new list, which ends up with the last element of that diagonal: [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],[2,7,2,1],[4]].



                                                             1 8 4[2]9 4 4[4]
                                                            [5]1 2 7[7]4 2 3
                                                            1[4]5 2 4[2]3 8
                                                            8 5[4]2 3 4[1]5


                                                            By collecting wrapping diagonals starting at the first element of each row we eventually accumulate all of the diagonals of the array.






                                                            share|improve this answer











                                                            $endgroup$


















                                                              2












                                                              $begingroup$


                                                              Charcoal, 61 56 53 bytes



                                                              F²FLθFL§θ⁰F⟦⁻κ×⊖⊗ιλ⟧⊞υ⊞O⎇∧λ﹪⁺μιLθ⊟υ⟦⟧§§θμλILΦυ⊙ι‹⌕ιλμ


                                                              Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                              F²


                                                              Loop over forward and reverse diagonals; i=0 represents forward diagonals while i=1 represents reverse diagonals.



                                                              FLθ


                                                              Loop over each row index. This represents the index of the start of the diagonal.



                                                              FL§θ⁰«


                                                              Loop over each column index.



                                                              F⟦⁻κ×⊖⊗ιλ⟧


                                                              Calculate the row index of the diagonal at this column index. I use a for loop over a single-element array instead of an assignment as this avoids having to wrap the assignment into a block with the following statement, thus saving a byte.



                                                              ⎇∧λ﹪⁺μιLθ


                                                              Check whether this is the first column or the diagonal is about to wrap around between bottom and top.



                                                              ⊟υ


                                                              If it isn't then pop the last list from the list of lists.



                                                              ⟦⟧


                                                              if it is then start a new empty list.



                                                              ⊞O...§§θμλ


                                                              Add the current diagonal entry to that list.



                                                              ⊞υ


                                                              And push that list (back) to the list of lists.



                                                              ILΦυ⊙ι‹⌕ιλμ


                                                              Count the number of lists that contain duplicates.



                                                              Let's take an example when i=0 and k=1. This means that we've already collected two diagonals, [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5]]. Here's our input:



                                                               1 8 4 2 9 4 4 4
                                                              [5]1 2 7 7 4 2 3
                                                              1 4 5 2 4 2 3 8
                                                              8 5 4 2 3 4 1 5


                                                              We then loop l from 0 to 7. This advances both the row and column by 1 each time:



                                                               1 8 4 2 9 4 4 4
                                                              [5]1 2 7 7 4 2 3
                                                              1[4]5 2 4 2 3 8
                                                              8 5[4]2 3 4 1 5


                                                              The list is now [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4]]. However when l is 3, we have k+l=4, a multiple of the height of the array. This means that we need to start a new list: [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],]. We then continue to collect diagonal elements:



                                                               1 8 4[2]9 4 4 4
                                                              [5]1 2 7[7]4 2 3
                                                              1[4]5 2 4[2]3 8
                                                              8 5[4]2 3 4[1]5


                                                              The list is now [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],[2,7,2,1]]. Now when l is 7, we have k+l=8, another multiple of the height of the array. This means that we need to start a new list, which ends up with the last element of that diagonal: [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],[2,7,2,1],[4]].



                                                               1 8 4[2]9 4 4[4]
                                                              [5]1 2 7[7]4 2 3
                                                              1[4]5 2 4[2]3 8
                                                              8 5[4]2 3 4[1]5


                                                              By collecting wrapping diagonals starting at the first element of each row we eventually accumulate all of the diagonals of the array.






                                                              share|improve this answer











                                                              $endgroup$
















                                                                2












                                                                2








                                                                2





                                                                $begingroup$


                                                                Charcoal, 61 56 53 bytes



                                                                F²FLθFL§θ⁰F⟦⁻κ×⊖⊗ιλ⟧⊞υ⊞O⎇∧λ﹪⁺μιLθ⊟υ⟦⟧§§θμλILΦυ⊙ι‹⌕ιλμ


                                                                Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                                F²


                                                                Loop over forward and reverse diagonals; i=0 represents forward diagonals while i=1 represents reverse diagonals.



                                                                FLθ


                                                                Loop over each row index. This represents the index of the start of the diagonal.



                                                                FL§θ⁰«


                                                                Loop over each column index.



                                                                F⟦⁻κ×⊖⊗ιλ⟧


                                                                Calculate the row index of the diagonal at this column index. I use a for loop over a single-element array instead of an assignment as this avoids having to wrap the assignment into a block with the following statement, thus saving a byte.



                                                                ⎇∧λ﹪⁺μιLθ


                                                                Check whether this is the first column or the diagonal is about to wrap around between bottom and top.



                                                                ⊟υ


                                                                If it isn't then pop the last list from the list of lists.



                                                                ⟦⟧


                                                                if it is then start a new empty list.



                                                                ⊞O...§§θμλ


                                                                Add the current diagonal entry to that list.



                                                                ⊞υ


                                                                And push that list (back) to the list of lists.



                                                                ILΦυ⊙ι‹⌕ιλμ


                                                                Count the number of lists that contain duplicates.



                                                                Let's take an example when i=0 and k=1. This means that we've already collected two diagonals, [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5]]. Here's our input:



                                                                 1 8 4 2 9 4 4 4
                                                                [5]1 2 7 7 4 2 3
                                                                1 4 5 2 4 2 3 8
                                                                8 5 4 2 3 4 1 5


                                                                We then loop l from 0 to 7. This advances both the row and column by 1 each time:



                                                                 1 8 4 2 9 4 4 4
                                                                [5]1 2 7 7 4 2 3
                                                                1[4]5 2 4 2 3 8
                                                                8 5[4]2 3 4 1 5


                                                                The list is now [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4]]. However when l is 3, we have k+l=4, a multiple of the height of the array. This means that we need to start a new list: [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],]. We then continue to collect diagonal elements:



                                                                 1 8 4[2]9 4 4 4
                                                                [5]1 2 7[7]4 2 3
                                                                1[4]5 2 4[2]3 8
                                                                8 5[4]2 3 4[1]5


                                                                The list is now [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],[2,7,2,1]]. Now when l is 7, we have k+l=8, another multiple of the height of the array. This means that we need to start a new list, which ends up with the last element of that diagonal: [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],[2,7,2,1],[4]].



                                                                 1 8 4[2]9 4 4[4]
                                                                [5]1 2 7[7]4 2 3
                                                                1[4]5 2 4[2]3 8
                                                                8 5[4]2 3 4[1]5


                                                                By collecting wrapping diagonals starting at the first element of each row we eventually accumulate all of the diagonals of the array.






                                                                share|improve this answer











                                                                $endgroup$




                                                                Charcoal, 61 56 53 bytes



                                                                F²FLθFL§θ⁰F⟦⁻κ×⊖⊗ιλ⟧⊞υ⊞O⎇∧λ﹪⁺μιLθ⊟υ⟦⟧§§θμλILΦυ⊙ι‹⌕ιλμ


                                                                Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                                F²


                                                                Loop over forward and reverse diagonals; i=0 represents forward diagonals while i=1 represents reverse diagonals.



                                                                FLθ


                                                                Loop over each row index. This represents the index of the start of the diagonal.



                                                                FL§θ⁰«


                                                                Loop over each column index.



                                                                F⟦⁻κ×⊖⊗ιλ⟧


                                                                Calculate the row index of the diagonal at this column index. I use a for loop over a single-element array instead of an assignment as this avoids having to wrap the assignment into a block with the following statement, thus saving a byte.



                                                                ⎇∧λ﹪⁺μιLθ


                                                                Check whether this is the first column or the diagonal is about to wrap around between bottom and top.



                                                                ⊟υ


                                                                If it isn't then pop the last list from the list of lists.



                                                                ⟦⟧


                                                                if it is then start a new empty list.



                                                                ⊞O...§§θμλ


                                                                Add the current diagonal entry to that list.



                                                                ⊞υ


                                                                And push that list (back) to the list of lists.



                                                                ILΦυ⊙ι‹⌕ιλμ


                                                                Count the number of lists that contain duplicates.



                                                                Let's take an example when i=0 and k=1. This means that we've already collected two diagonals, [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5]]. Here's our input:



                                                                 1 8 4 2 9 4 4 4
                                                                [5]1 2 7 7 4 2 3
                                                                1 4 5 2 4 2 3 8
                                                                8 5 4 2 3 4 1 5


                                                                We then loop l from 0 to 7. This advances both the row and column by 1 each time:



                                                                 1 8 4 2 9 4 4 4
                                                                [5]1 2 7 7 4 2 3
                                                                1[4]5 2 4 2 3 8
                                                                8 5[4]2 3 4 1 5


                                                                The list is now [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4]]. However when l is 3, we have k+l=4, a multiple of the height of the array. This means that we need to start a new list: [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],]. We then continue to collect diagonal elements:



                                                                 1 8 4[2]9 4 4 4
                                                                [5]1 2 7[7]4 2 3
                                                                1[4]5 2 4[2]3 8
                                                                8 5[4]2 3 4[1]5


                                                                The list is now [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],[2,7,2,1]]. Now when l is 7, we have k+l=8, another multiple of the height of the array. This means that we need to start a new list, which ends up with the last element of that diagonal: [[1,1,5,2],[9,4,3,5],[5,4,4],[2,7,2,1],[4]].



                                                                 1 8 4[2]9 4 4[4]
                                                                [5]1 2 7[7]4 2 3
                                                                1[4]5 2 4[2]3 8
                                                                8 5[4]2 3 4[1]5


                                                                By collecting wrapping diagonals starting at the first element of each row we eventually accumulate all of the diagonals of the array.







                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                edited Jan 26 at 20:50

























                                                                answered Jan 25 at 23:52









                                                                NeilNeil

                                                                80.7k744178




                                                                80.7k744178























                                                                    2












                                                                    $begingroup$


                                                                    Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 99 98 96 94 83 bytes



                                                                    Count[DuplicateFreeQ@Diagonal[#,i]~Table~{i,-t,t=#~Total~2}&/@{#,Reverse@#},1<0,2]&


                                                                    Try it online!





                                                                    • Function[a,a~Diagonal~#&/@Range[t=-#~Total~2,-t]] gets all diagonals of a-- which works because #~Total~2 is larger than any dimension of a.






                                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                                    $endgroup$


















                                                                      2












                                                                      $begingroup$


                                                                      Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 99 98 96 94 83 bytes



                                                                      Count[DuplicateFreeQ@Diagonal[#,i]~Table~{i,-t,t=#~Total~2}&/@{#,Reverse@#},1<0,2]&


                                                                      Try it online!





                                                                      • Function[a,a~Diagonal~#&/@Range[t=-#~Total~2,-t]] gets all diagonals of a-- which works because #~Total~2 is larger than any dimension of a.






                                                                      share|improve this answer











                                                                      $endgroup$
















                                                                        2












                                                                        2








                                                                        2





                                                                        $begingroup$


                                                                        Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 99 98 96 94 83 bytes



                                                                        Count[DuplicateFreeQ@Diagonal[#,i]~Table~{i,-t,t=#~Total~2}&/@{#,Reverse@#},1<0,2]&


                                                                        Try it online!





                                                                        • Function[a,a~Diagonal~#&/@Range[t=-#~Total~2,-t]] gets all diagonals of a-- which works because #~Total~2 is larger than any dimension of a.






                                                                        share|improve this answer











                                                                        $endgroup$




                                                                        Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 99 98 96 94 83 bytes



                                                                        Count[DuplicateFreeQ@Diagonal[#,i]~Table~{i,-t,t=#~Total~2}&/@{#,Reverse@#},1<0,2]&


                                                                        Try it online!





                                                                        • Function[a,a~Diagonal~#&/@Range[t=-#~Total~2,-t]] gets all diagonals of a-- which works because #~Total~2 is larger than any dimension of a.







                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                        edited Jan 27 at 16:48

























                                                                        answered Jan 26 at 22:34









                                                                        lirtosiastlirtosiast

                                                                        18.6k437109




                                                                        18.6k437109























                                                                            1












                                                                            $begingroup$

                                                                            APL+WIN, 69 bytes



                                                                            Prompts for a 2d matrix of the form 4 6⍴1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1



                                                                            This yields:



                                                                            1 2 1 2 1 2
                                                                            1 2 3 4 5 6
                                                                            6 5 4 3 2 1
                                                                            2 1 2 1 2 1

                                                                            +/~(v⍳¨v)≡¨⍳¨⍴¨v←(v←⊂[1](⌽0,⍳1↓n)⌽(n⍴0),m,((n←0 ¯1+↑⍴m)⍴0),⌽m←⎕)~¨0


                                                                            Try it online! Courtesy of Dyalog Classic



                                                                            Explanation:



                                                                            (⌽0,⍳1↓n)⌽(n⍴0),m pad m with zeros to isolate diagonals

                                                                            ((n←0 ¯1+↑⍴m)⍴0),⌽m pad rotated m with zeros to isolate anti-diagonals


                                                                            Yields:



                                                                            1 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0
                                                                            0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0
                                                                            0 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0
                                                                            0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 2

                                                                            v←(v←⊂[1](.....)~¨0 enclose the diagonals as a nested vector with padded zeros removed

                                                                            +/~(v⍳¨v)≡¨⍳¨⍴¨v identify diagnols with duplicate entries and sum





                                                                            share|improve this answer











                                                                            $endgroup$


















                                                                              1












                                                                              $begingroup$

                                                                              APL+WIN, 69 bytes



                                                                              Prompts for a 2d matrix of the form 4 6⍴1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1



                                                                              This yields:



                                                                              1 2 1 2 1 2
                                                                              1 2 3 4 5 6
                                                                              6 5 4 3 2 1
                                                                              2 1 2 1 2 1

                                                                              +/~(v⍳¨v)≡¨⍳¨⍴¨v←(v←⊂[1](⌽0,⍳1↓n)⌽(n⍴0),m,((n←0 ¯1+↑⍴m)⍴0),⌽m←⎕)~¨0


                                                                              Try it online! Courtesy of Dyalog Classic



                                                                              Explanation:



                                                                              (⌽0,⍳1↓n)⌽(n⍴0),m pad m with zeros to isolate diagonals

                                                                              ((n←0 ¯1+↑⍴m)⍴0),⌽m pad rotated m with zeros to isolate anti-diagonals


                                                                              Yields:



                                                                              1 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0
                                                                              0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0
                                                                              0 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0
                                                                              0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 2

                                                                              v←(v←⊂[1](.....)~¨0 enclose the diagonals as a nested vector with padded zeros removed

                                                                              +/~(v⍳¨v)≡¨⍳¨⍴¨v identify diagnols with duplicate entries and sum





                                                                              share|improve this answer











                                                                              $endgroup$
















                                                                                1












                                                                                1








                                                                                1





                                                                                $begingroup$

                                                                                APL+WIN, 69 bytes



                                                                                Prompts for a 2d matrix of the form 4 6⍴1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1



                                                                                This yields:



                                                                                1 2 1 2 1 2
                                                                                1 2 3 4 5 6
                                                                                6 5 4 3 2 1
                                                                                2 1 2 1 2 1

                                                                                +/~(v⍳¨v)≡¨⍳¨⍴¨v←(v←⊂[1](⌽0,⍳1↓n)⌽(n⍴0),m,((n←0 ¯1+↑⍴m)⍴0),⌽m←⎕)~¨0


                                                                                Try it online! Courtesy of Dyalog Classic



                                                                                Explanation:



                                                                                (⌽0,⍳1↓n)⌽(n⍴0),m pad m with zeros to isolate diagonals

                                                                                ((n←0 ¯1+↑⍴m)⍴0),⌽m pad rotated m with zeros to isolate anti-diagonals


                                                                                Yields:



                                                                                1 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0
                                                                                0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0
                                                                                0 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0
                                                                                0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 2

                                                                                v←(v←⊂[1](.....)~¨0 enclose the diagonals as a nested vector with padded zeros removed

                                                                                +/~(v⍳¨v)≡¨⍳¨⍴¨v identify diagnols with duplicate entries and sum





                                                                                share|improve this answer











                                                                                $endgroup$



                                                                                APL+WIN, 69 bytes



                                                                                Prompts for a 2d matrix of the form 4 6⍴1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1



                                                                                This yields:



                                                                                1 2 1 2 1 2
                                                                                1 2 3 4 5 6
                                                                                6 5 4 3 2 1
                                                                                2 1 2 1 2 1

                                                                                +/~(v⍳¨v)≡¨⍳¨⍴¨v←(v←⊂[1](⌽0,⍳1↓n)⌽(n⍴0),m,((n←0 ¯1+↑⍴m)⍴0),⌽m←⎕)~¨0


                                                                                Try it online! Courtesy of Dyalog Classic



                                                                                Explanation:



                                                                                (⌽0,⍳1↓n)⌽(n⍴0),m pad m with zeros to isolate diagonals

                                                                                ((n←0 ¯1+↑⍴m)⍴0),⌽m pad rotated m with zeros to isolate anti-diagonals


                                                                                Yields:



                                                                                1 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0
                                                                                0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0
                                                                                0 0 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0
                                                                                0 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 2

                                                                                v←(v←⊂[1](.....)~¨0 enclose the diagonals as a nested vector with padded zeros removed

                                                                                +/~(v⍳¨v)≡¨⍳¨⍴¨v identify diagnols with duplicate entries and sum






                                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                                edited Jan 27 at 10:46

























                                                                                answered Jan 27 at 10:38









                                                                                GrahamGraham

                                                                                2,32678




                                                                                2,32678























                                                                                    1












                                                                                    $begingroup$

                                                                                    Perl 5, 89 82 bytes



                                                                                    map{$i=0;map{$a[$x+$i].=$_;$b[@F-$x+$i++].=$_}/d/g;$x++}@F;$_=grep/(.).*1/,@a,@b


                                                                                    TIO






                                                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                                                    $endgroup$


















                                                                                      1












                                                                                      $begingroup$

                                                                                      Perl 5, 89 82 bytes



                                                                                      map{$i=0;map{$a[$x+$i].=$_;$b[@F-$x+$i++].=$_}/d/g;$x++}@F;$_=grep/(.).*1/,@a,@b


                                                                                      TIO






                                                                                      share|improve this answer











                                                                                      $endgroup$
















                                                                                        1












                                                                                        1








                                                                                        1





                                                                                        $begingroup$

                                                                                        Perl 5, 89 82 bytes



                                                                                        map{$i=0;map{$a[$x+$i].=$_;$b[@F-$x+$i++].=$_}/d/g;$x++}@F;$_=grep/(.).*1/,@a,@b


                                                                                        TIO






                                                                                        share|improve this answer











                                                                                        $endgroup$



                                                                                        Perl 5, 89 82 bytes



                                                                                        map{$i=0;map{$a[$x+$i].=$_;$b[@F-$x+$i++].=$_}/d/g;$x++}@F;$_=grep/(.).*1/,@a,@b


                                                                                        TIO







                                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                                        edited Jan 28 at 21:11

























                                                                                        answered Jan 28 at 16:42









                                                                                        Nahuel FouilleulNahuel Fouilleul

                                                                                        2,38529




                                                                                        2,38529























                                                                                            1












                                                                                            $begingroup$

                                                                                            TSQL, 140 128 bytes



                                                                                            Found a way to golf 12 characters. This is no longer the longest solution.



                                                                                            Golfed:



                                                                                            SELECT sum(iif(y+x=j+i,1,0)+iif(y-x=j-i,1,0))FROM
                                                                                            @,(SELECT x i,y j,max(y)over()m,v w
                                                                                            FROM @)d WHERE(x*y=0or m=y)and v=w and x<i


                                                                                            Ungolfed:



                                                                                            DECLARE @ table(v int,x int,y int)
                                                                                            -- v = value
                                                                                            -- x = row
                                                                                            -- y = column
                                                                                            INSERT @ values
                                                                                            (1,0,0),(2,0,1),(1,0,2),(2,0,3),(1,0,4),(2,0,5),
                                                                                            (1,1,0),(2,1,1),(3,1,2),(4,1,3),(5,1,4),(6,1,5),
                                                                                            (6,2,0),(5,2,1),(4,2,2),(3,2,3),(2,2,4),(1,2,5),
                                                                                            (2,3,0),(1,3,1),(2,3,2),(1,3,3),(2,3,4),(1,3,5)


                                                                                            SELECT sum(iif(y+x=j+i,1,0)+iif(y-x=j-i,1,0))
                                                                                            FROM @,(SELECT x i,y j,max(y)over()m,v w FROM @)d
                                                                                            WHERE
                                                                                            (x*y=0or m=y)
                                                                                            and v=w
                                                                                            and x<i


                                                                                            Try it out






                                                                                            share|improve this answer











                                                                                            $endgroup$


















                                                                                              1












                                                                                              $begingroup$

                                                                                              TSQL, 140 128 bytes



                                                                                              Found a way to golf 12 characters. This is no longer the longest solution.



                                                                                              Golfed:



                                                                                              SELECT sum(iif(y+x=j+i,1,0)+iif(y-x=j-i,1,0))FROM
                                                                                              @,(SELECT x i,y j,max(y)over()m,v w
                                                                                              FROM @)d WHERE(x*y=0or m=y)and v=w and x<i


                                                                                              Ungolfed:



                                                                                              DECLARE @ table(v int,x int,y int)
                                                                                              -- v = value
                                                                                              -- x = row
                                                                                              -- y = column
                                                                                              INSERT @ values
                                                                                              (1,0,0),(2,0,1),(1,0,2),(2,0,3),(1,0,4),(2,0,5),
                                                                                              (1,1,0),(2,1,1),(3,1,2),(4,1,3),(5,1,4),(6,1,5),
                                                                                              (6,2,0),(5,2,1),(4,2,2),(3,2,3),(2,2,4),(1,2,5),
                                                                                              (2,3,0),(1,3,1),(2,3,2),(1,3,3),(2,3,4),(1,3,5)


                                                                                              SELECT sum(iif(y+x=j+i,1,0)+iif(y-x=j-i,1,0))
                                                                                              FROM @,(SELECT x i,y j,max(y)over()m,v w FROM @)d
                                                                                              WHERE
                                                                                              (x*y=0or m=y)
                                                                                              and v=w
                                                                                              and x<i


                                                                                              Try it out






                                                                                              share|improve this answer











                                                                                              $endgroup$
















                                                                                                1












                                                                                                1








                                                                                                1





                                                                                                $begingroup$

                                                                                                TSQL, 140 128 bytes



                                                                                                Found a way to golf 12 characters. This is no longer the longest solution.



                                                                                                Golfed:



                                                                                                SELECT sum(iif(y+x=j+i,1,0)+iif(y-x=j-i,1,0))FROM
                                                                                                @,(SELECT x i,y j,max(y)over()m,v w
                                                                                                FROM @)d WHERE(x*y=0or m=y)and v=w and x<i


                                                                                                Ungolfed:



                                                                                                DECLARE @ table(v int,x int,y int)
                                                                                                -- v = value
                                                                                                -- x = row
                                                                                                -- y = column
                                                                                                INSERT @ values
                                                                                                (1,0,0),(2,0,1),(1,0,2),(2,0,3),(1,0,4),(2,0,5),
                                                                                                (1,1,0),(2,1,1),(3,1,2),(4,1,3),(5,1,4),(6,1,5),
                                                                                                (6,2,0),(5,2,1),(4,2,2),(3,2,3),(2,2,4),(1,2,5),
                                                                                                (2,3,0),(1,3,1),(2,3,2),(1,3,3),(2,3,4),(1,3,5)


                                                                                                SELECT sum(iif(y+x=j+i,1,0)+iif(y-x=j-i,1,0))
                                                                                                FROM @,(SELECT x i,y j,max(y)over()m,v w FROM @)d
                                                                                                WHERE
                                                                                                (x*y=0or m=y)
                                                                                                and v=w
                                                                                                and x<i


                                                                                                Try it out






                                                                                                share|improve this answer











                                                                                                $endgroup$



                                                                                                TSQL, 140 128 bytes



                                                                                                Found a way to golf 12 characters. This is no longer the longest solution.



                                                                                                Golfed:



                                                                                                SELECT sum(iif(y+x=j+i,1,0)+iif(y-x=j-i,1,0))FROM
                                                                                                @,(SELECT x i,y j,max(y)over()m,v w
                                                                                                FROM @)d WHERE(x*y=0or m=y)and v=w and x<i


                                                                                                Ungolfed:



                                                                                                DECLARE @ table(v int,x int,y int)
                                                                                                -- v = value
                                                                                                -- x = row
                                                                                                -- y = column
                                                                                                INSERT @ values
                                                                                                (1,0,0),(2,0,1),(1,0,2),(2,0,3),(1,0,4),(2,0,5),
                                                                                                (1,1,0),(2,1,1),(3,1,2),(4,1,3),(5,1,4),(6,1,5),
                                                                                                (6,2,0),(5,2,1),(4,2,2),(3,2,3),(2,2,4),(1,2,5),
                                                                                                (2,3,0),(1,3,1),(2,3,2),(1,3,3),(2,3,4),(1,3,5)


                                                                                                SELECT sum(iif(y+x=j+i,1,0)+iif(y-x=j-i,1,0))
                                                                                                FROM @,(SELECT x i,y j,max(y)over()m,v w FROM @)d
                                                                                                WHERE
                                                                                                (x*y=0or m=y)
                                                                                                and v=w
                                                                                                and x<i


                                                                                                Try it out







                                                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                                                edited Jan 29 at 8:23

























                                                                                                answered Jan 28 at 13:02









                                                                                                t-clausen.dkt-clausen.dk

                                                                                                1,884314




                                                                                                1,884314






























                                                                                                    draft saved

                                                                                                    draft discarded




















































                                                                                                    If this is an answer to a challenge…




                                                                                                    • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                                                                                                    • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                                                                                                      Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                                                                                                    • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                                                                                                    More generally…




                                                                                                    • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                                                                                                    • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).





                                                                                                    draft saved


                                                                                                    draft discarded














                                                                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                                                                    function () {
                                                                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f179108%2fspot-all-antidiagonals-with-duplicated-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                                                                    }
                                                                                                    );

                                                                                                    Post as a guest















                                                                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                                    Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                                                                                                    Aardman Animations

                                                                                                    Are they similar matrix