Does SDL Tridion Sites 9 accept DD4T XML model?
Currently we have a .NET webapplication which still uses DD4T 1.31. The CMS version is currently SDL Tridion 2013 SP1. We want to update to SDL Tridion Sites 9. Is it possible to update DD4T but stay on the 'old' XML dataformat?
Of course we have also plannend to update the dataformat but I am investigating what all possible scenarios are.
2013-sp1 dd4t dd4t-2 sites-9
asked Jan 25 at 10:27
Peter van der LugtPeter van der Lugt
715314
add a comment |
Currently we have a .NET webapplication which still uses DD4T 1.31. The CMS version is currently SDL Tridion 2013 SP1. We want to update to SDL Tridion Sites 9. Is it possible to update DD4T but stay on the 'old' XML dataformat?
Of course we have also plannend to update the dataformat but I am investigating what all possible scenarios are.
2013-sp1 dd4t dd4t-2 sites-9
asked Jan 25 at 10:27
Peter van der LugtPeter van der Lugt
715314
add a comment |
Currently we have a .NET webapplication which still uses DD4T 1.31. The CMS version is currently SDL Tridion 2013 SP1. We want to update to SDL Tridion Sites 9. Is it possible to update DD4T but stay on the 'old' XML dataformat?
Of course we have also plannend to update the dataformat but I am investigating what all possible scenarios are.
2013-sp1 dd4t dd4t-2 sites-9
asked Jan 25 at 10:27
Peter van der LugtPeter van der Lugt
715314
Currently we have a .NET webapplication which still uses DD4T 1.31. The CMS version is currently SDL Tridion 2013 SP1. We want to update to SDL Tridion Sites 9. Is it possible to update DD4T but stay on the 'old' XML dataformat?
Of course we have also plannend to update the dataformat but I am investigating what all possible scenarios are.
2013-sp1 dd4t dd4t-2 sites-9
2013-sp1 dd4t dd4t-2 sites-9
asked Jan 25 at 10:27
Peter van der LugtPeter van der Lugt
715314
asked Jan 25 at 10:27
Peter van der LugtPeter van der Lugt
715314
asked Jan 25 at 10:27
Peter van der LugtPeter van der Lugt
715314
asked Jan 25 at 10:27
Peter van der LugtPeter van der Lugt
715314
asked Jan 25 at 10:27
Peter van der LugtPeter van der Lugt
715314
715314
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There is no provider to make DD4T version 1 work with Tridion 9. You have 2 choices:
- Upgrade to DD4T 2.
- Create your own Tridion 9 provider.
If you go for option 2, you must also update the ProviderAssemblyNames.cs class in the DD4T.ContentModel.Contracts assembly, and add your custom provider name there.
answered Jan 25 at 11:45
QuirijnQuirijn
4,475830
Before I accept the answer, can I just update to DD4T 2.0, without using the JSON datamodel (so keep using the old XML model).
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 25 at 12:06
It's possible, but there are some caveats. I suggest you check out this blog by Pankaj Gaur: pankajgaur83.wordpress.com/2016/04/15/….
– Quirijn
Jan 25 at 14:12
Thank you, Quirijn. Perfect answers on my question.
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 28 at 8:54
add a comment |
Please read more about here DD4T Supports SDL Tridion Sites 9, In your case, you might need to upgrade your DD4T version to the latest one both web app as well CME DD4T templates.
Note:
It's supported only microservices-based implementation when upgrading to Sites 9
I hope it helps.
answered Jan 25 at 11:17
VelmuruganVelmurugan
3,495717
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "485"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftridion.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f19722%2fdoes-sdl-tridion-sites-9-accept-dd4t-xml-model%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is no provider to make DD4T version 1 work with Tridion 9. You have 2 choices:
- Upgrade to DD4T 2.
- Create your own Tridion 9 provider.
If you go for option 2, you must also update the ProviderAssemblyNames.cs class in the DD4T.ContentModel.Contracts assembly, and add your custom provider name there.
answered Jan 25 at 11:45
QuirijnQuirijn
4,475830
Before I accept the answer, can I just update to DD4T 2.0, without using the JSON datamodel (so keep using the old XML model).
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 25 at 12:06
It's possible, but there are some caveats. I suggest you check out this blog by Pankaj Gaur: pankajgaur83.wordpress.com/2016/04/15/….
– Quirijn
Jan 25 at 14:12
Thank you, Quirijn. Perfect answers on my question.
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 28 at 8:54
add a comment |
There is no provider to make DD4T version 1 work with Tridion 9. You have 2 choices:
- Upgrade to DD4T 2.
- Create your own Tridion 9 provider.
If you go for option 2, you must also update the ProviderAssemblyNames.cs class in the DD4T.ContentModel.Contracts assembly, and add your custom provider name there.
answered Jan 25 at 11:45
QuirijnQuirijn
4,475830
Before I accept the answer, can I just update to DD4T 2.0, without using the JSON datamodel (so keep using the old XML model).
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 25 at 12:06
It's possible, but there are some caveats. I suggest you check out this blog by Pankaj Gaur: pankajgaur83.wordpress.com/2016/04/15/….
– Quirijn
Jan 25 at 14:12
Thank you, Quirijn. Perfect answers on my question.
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 28 at 8:54
add a comment |
There is no provider to make DD4T version 1 work with Tridion 9. You have 2 choices:
- Upgrade to DD4T 2.
- Create your own Tridion 9 provider.
If you go for option 2, you must also update the ProviderAssemblyNames.cs class in the DD4T.ContentModel.Contracts assembly, and add your custom provider name there.
answered Jan 25 at 11:45
QuirijnQuirijn
4,475830
There is no provider to make DD4T version 1 work with Tridion 9. You have 2 choices:
- Upgrade to DD4T 2.
- Create your own Tridion 9 provider.
If you go for option 2, you must also update the ProviderAssemblyNames.cs class in the DD4T.ContentModel.Contracts assembly, and add your custom provider name there.
answered Jan 25 at 11:45
QuirijnQuirijn
4,475830
answered Jan 25 at 11:45
QuirijnQuirijn
4,475830
answered Jan 25 at 11:45
QuirijnQuirijn
4,475830
answered Jan 25 at 11:45
QuirijnQuirijn
4,475830
4,475830
Before I accept the answer, can I just update to DD4T 2.0, without using the JSON datamodel (so keep using the old XML model).
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 25 at 12:06
It's possible, but there are some caveats. I suggest you check out this blog by Pankaj Gaur: pankajgaur83.wordpress.com/2016/04/15/….
– Quirijn
Jan 25 at 14:12
Thank you, Quirijn. Perfect answers on my question.
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 28 at 8:54
add a comment |
Before I accept the answer, can I just update to DD4T 2.0, without using the JSON datamodel (so keep using the old XML model).
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 25 at 12:06
It's possible, but there are some caveats. I suggest you check out this blog by Pankaj Gaur: pankajgaur83.wordpress.com/2016/04/15/….
– Quirijn
Jan 25 at 14:12
Thank you, Quirijn. Perfect answers on my question.
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 28 at 8:54
Before I accept the answer, can I just update to DD4T 2.0, without using the JSON datamodel (so keep using the old XML model).
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 25 at 12:06
Before I accept the answer, can I just update to DD4T 2.0, without using the JSON datamodel (so keep using the old XML model).
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 25 at 12:06
It's possible, but there are some caveats. I suggest you check out this blog by Pankaj Gaur: pankajgaur83.wordpress.com/2016/04/15/….
– Quirijn
Jan 25 at 14:12
It's possible, but there are some caveats. I suggest you check out this blog by Pankaj Gaur: pankajgaur83.wordpress.com/2016/04/15/….
– Quirijn
Jan 25 at 14:12
Thank you, Quirijn. Perfect answers on my question.
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 28 at 8:54
Thank you, Quirijn. Perfect answers on my question.
– Peter van der Lugt
Jan 28 at 8:54
add a comment |
Please read more about here DD4T Supports SDL Tridion Sites 9, In your case, you might need to upgrade your DD4T version to the latest one both web app as well CME DD4T templates.
Note:
It's supported only microservices-based implementation when upgrading to Sites 9
I hope it helps.
answered Jan 25 at 11:17
VelmuruganVelmurugan
3,495717
add a comment |
Please read more about here DD4T Supports SDL Tridion Sites 9, In your case, you might need to upgrade your DD4T version to the latest one both web app as well CME DD4T templates.
Note:
It's supported only microservices-based implementation when upgrading to Sites 9
I hope it helps.
answered Jan 25 at 11:17
VelmuruganVelmurugan
3,495717
add a comment |
Please read more about here DD4T Supports SDL Tridion Sites 9, In your case, you might need to upgrade your DD4T version to the latest one both web app as well CME DD4T templates.
Note:
It's supported only microservices-based implementation when upgrading to Sites 9
I hope it helps.
answered Jan 25 at 11:17
VelmuruganVelmurugan
3,495717
Please read more about here DD4T Supports SDL Tridion Sites 9, In your case, you might need to upgrade your DD4T version to the latest one both web app as well CME DD4T templates.
Note:
It's supported only microservices-based implementation when upgrading to Sites 9
I hope it helps.
answered Jan 25 at 11:17
VelmuruganVelmurugan
3,495717
edited Jan 25 at 11:37
answered Jan 25 at 11:17
VelmuruganVelmurugan
3,495717
answered Jan 25 at 11:17
VelmuruganVelmurugan
3,495717
answered Jan 25 at 11:17
VelmuruganVelmurugan
3,495717
3,495717
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Tridion Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftridion.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f19722%2fdoes-sdl-tridion-sites-9-accept-dd4t-xml-model%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
