On Windows OS, Can I only Use NT Hash for WPA-Enterprise PEAP-MSCHAPv2 Auth?
I am recently on a wireless network security assessment task for a enterprise client. They didn't apply the WPA-PEAP-MSCHAPv2 user authentication configuration correctly (stations don't validate the servers' identity) and I successfully intercepted the NETNTLM string by Evil Twin attack, cracked the string, got the NT hash and managed to join their wireless network from Kali Linux using the wpa-supplicant tool with the hash.
However, for reasons I don't know or understand, the client's IT manager insists it's not adequate PoC if I can only show him the evidence that Kali joined their network and asked me to show him that I got my Windows laptop into their network.
I did a lot of Googling trying to find out how to let Windows machine joining a wireless network only use the NT hash instead of the plaintext password but cannot find anything helpful. So I wonder if this is viable at all or I am just stuck on some questions too naive to be given an answer?
Thank you!
windows wireless-networking security wpa-supplicant eap-mschapv2
add a comment |
I am recently on a wireless network security assessment task for a enterprise client. They didn't apply the WPA-PEAP-MSCHAPv2 user authentication configuration correctly (stations don't validate the servers' identity) and I successfully intercepted the NETNTLM string by Evil Twin attack, cracked the string, got the NT hash and managed to join their wireless network from Kali Linux using the wpa-supplicant tool with the hash.
However, for reasons I don't know or understand, the client's IT manager insists it's not adequate PoC if I can only show him the evidence that Kali joined their network and asked me to show him that I got my Windows laptop into their network.
I did a lot of Googling trying to find out how to let Windows machine joining a wireless network only use the NT hash instead of the plaintext password but cannot find anything helpful. So I wonder if this is viable at all or I am just stuck on some questions too naive to be given an answer?
Thank you!
windows wireless-networking security wpa-supplicant eap-mschapv2
add a comment |
I am recently on a wireless network security assessment task for a enterprise client. They didn't apply the WPA-PEAP-MSCHAPv2 user authentication configuration correctly (stations don't validate the servers' identity) and I successfully intercepted the NETNTLM string by Evil Twin attack, cracked the string, got the NT hash and managed to join their wireless network from Kali Linux using the wpa-supplicant tool with the hash.
However, for reasons I don't know or understand, the client's IT manager insists it's not adequate PoC if I can only show him the evidence that Kali joined their network and asked me to show him that I got my Windows laptop into their network.
I did a lot of Googling trying to find out how to let Windows machine joining a wireless network only use the NT hash instead of the plaintext password but cannot find anything helpful. So I wonder if this is viable at all or I am just stuck on some questions too naive to be given an answer?
Thank you!
windows wireless-networking security wpa-supplicant eap-mschapv2
I am recently on a wireless network security assessment task for a enterprise client. They didn't apply the WPA-PEAP-MSCHAPv2 user authentication configuration correctly (stations don't validate the servers' identity) and I successfully intercepted the NETNTLM string by Evil Twin attack, cracked the string, got the NT hash and managed to join their wireless network from Kali Linux using the wpa-supplicant tool with the hash.
However, for reasons I don't know or understand, the client's IT manager insists it's not adequate PoC if I can only show him the evidence that Kali joined their network and asked me to show him that I got my Windows laptop into their network.
I did a lot of Googling trying to find out how to let Windows machine joining a wireless network only use the NT hash instead of the plaintext password but cannot find anything helpful. So I wonder if this is viable at all or I am just stuck on some questions too naive to be given an answer?
Thank you!
windows wireless-networking security wpa-supplicant eap-mschapv2
windows wireless-networking security wpa-supplicant eap-mschapv2
asked Jan 31 at 2:39
hubbeshubbes
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1400355%2fon-windows-os-can-i-only-use-nt-hash-for-wpa-enterprise-peap-mschapv2-auth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1400355%2fon-windows-os-can-i-only-use-nt-hash-for-wpa-enterprise-peap-mschapv2-auth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown