Update records with ArcPy update cursor? Geodatabase format
I try to update thousands of rows when all records get the same value.
My code has a loop that runs thousands of times.
Is it possible for the program to make the change to all the columns in one command and save run time ?
For example, php+mySQL can do this:
mysql_query("UPDATE all_records SET Xcenter = $val1, Ycenter = $val2 WHERE ID > 100");
This is my code:
for row in rows:
row.setValue("Xcenter", val1)
row.setValue("Ycenter", val2)
rows.updateRow(row)
arcpy arcmap
add a comment |
I try to update thousands of rows when all records get the same value.
My code has a loop that runs thousands of times.
Is it possible for the program to make the change to all the columns in one command and save run time ?
For example, php+mySQL can do this:
mysql_query("UPDATE all_records SET Xcenter = $val1, Ycenter = $val2 WHERE ID > 100");
This is my code:
for row in rows:
row.setValue("Xcenter", val1)
row.setValue("Ycenter", val2)
rows.updateRow(row)
arcpy arcmap
Please Edit the question to specify the data storage format of the target (file geodatabase, RDBMS, shapefile,...) and provide a sample of your existing code.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:27
1
Please add more code, since that fragment is missing cursor creation. Note that there are no versions of ArcGIS which aren't retired for which non-DataAccess cursors are appropriate. setRow is not supported on DataAcess cursor rows, and DataAcess cursors are much faster than the old, deprecated cursors. You also have indent issues.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:38
exactly. I mean thousands of records. I updated. Thanks
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:51
What's wrong with a for loop? In essence, it's exactly what's going one behind the scenes of any other method, except, with a da cursor, it should be more efficient than using an unnecessary intermediary like CalculateField.
– Tom
Jan 7 at 15:53
add a comment |
I try to update thousands of rows when all records get the same value.
My code has a loop that runs thousands of times.
Is it possible for the program to make the change to all the columns in one command and save run time ?
For example, php+mySQL can do this:
mysql_query("UPDATE all_records SET Xcenter = $val1, Ycenter = $val2 WHERE ID > 100");
This is my code:
for row in rows:
row.setValue("Xcenter", val1)
row.setValue("Ycenter", val2)
rows.updateRow(row)
arcpy arcmap
I try to update thousands of rows when all records get the same value.
My code has a loop that runs thousands of times.
Is it possible for the program to make the change to all the columns in one command and save run time ?
For example, php+mySQL can do this:
mysql_query("UPDATE all_records SET Xcenter = $val1, Ycenter = $val2 WHERE ID > 100");
This is my code:
for row in rows:
row.setValue("Xcenter", val1)
row.setValue("Ycenter", val2)
rows.updateRow(row)
arcpy arcmap
arcpy arcmap
edited Jan 7 at 14:57
BERA
15.3k52042
15.3k52042
asked Jan 7 at 14:22
Oz1988Oz1988
133
133
Please Edit the question to specify the data storage format of the target (file geodatabase, RDBMS, shapefile,...) and provide a sample of your existing code.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:27
1
Please add more code, since that fragment is missing cursor creation. Note that there are no versions of ArcGIS which aren't retired for which non-DataAccess cursors are appropriate. setRow is not supported on DataAcess cursor rows, and DataAcess cursors are much faster than the old, deprecated cursors. You also have indent issues.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:38
exactly. I mean thousands of records. I updated. Thanks
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:51
What's wrong with a for loop? In essence, it's exactly what's going one behind the scenes of any other method, except, with a da cursor, it should be more efficient than using an unnecessary intermediary like CalculateField.
– Tom
Jan 7 at 15:53
add a comment |
Please Edit the question to specify the data storage format of the target (file geodatabase, RDBMS, shapefile,...) and provide a sample of your existing code.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:27
1
Please add more code, since that fragment is missing cursor creation. Note that there are no versions of ArcGIS which aren't retired for which non-DataAccess cursors are appropriate. setRow is not supported on DataAcess cursor rows, and DataAcess cursors are much faster than the old, deprecated cursors. You also have indent issues.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:38
exactly. I mean thousands of records. I updated. Thanks
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:51
What's wrong with a for loop? In essence, it's exactly what's going one behind the scenes of any other method, except, with a da cursor, it should be more efficient than using an unnecessary intermediary like CalculateField.
– Tom
Jan 7 at 15:53
Please Edit the question to specify the data storage format of the target (file geodatabase, RDBMS, shapefile,...) and provide a sample of your existing code.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:27
Please Edit the question to specify the data storage format of the target (file geodatabase, RDBMS, shapefile,...) and provide a sample of your existing code.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:27
1
1
Please add more code, since that fragment is missing cursor creation. Note that there are no versions of ArcGIS which aren't retired for which non-DataAccess cursors are appropriate. setRow is not supported on DataAcess cursor rows, and DataAcess cursors are much faster than the old, deprecated cursors. You also have indent issues.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:38
Please add more code, since that fragment is missing cursor creation. Note that there are no versions of ArcGIS which aren't retired for which non-DataAccess cursors are appropriate. setRow is not supported on DataAcess cursor rows, and DataAcess cursors are much faster than the old, deprecated cursors. You also have indent issues.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:38
exactly. I mean thousands of records. I updated. Thanks
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:51
exactly. I mean thousands of records. I updated. Thanks
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:51
What's wrong with a for loop? In essence, it's exactly what's going one behind the scenes of any other method, except, with a da cursor, it should be more efficient than using an unnecessary intermediary like CalculateField.
– Tom
Jan 7 at 15:53
What's wrong with a for loop? In essence, it's exactly what's going one behind the scenes of any other method, except, with a da cursor, it should be more efficient than using an unnecessary intermediary like CalculateField.
– Tom
Jan 7 at 15:53
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I have a weird feeling that you are looking for arcpy.CalculateField_management
It is simple and quick calculate field help
Great idea.. TNX :)
– Oz1988
Jan 9 at 12:36
add a comment |
Try the da.UpdateCursor:
import arcpy
feature_class = r'C:data.gdbfeatures1'
val1 = 123
val2 = 456
sql = """{0} > 100""".format(arcpy.AddFieldDelimiters(feature_class, 'ID'))
fields_to_update = ['Xcenter','Ycenter']
with arcpy.da.UpdateCursor(feature_class, fields_to_update, sql) as cursor:
for row in cursor:
row = val1, val2
cursor.updateRow(row)
First of all thank you Also in your program there is a loop that runs thousands of times (as many records) I'm looking for something to do it at once. The values I put are identical to all records so I do not want to run thousands of times in a loop
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:47
1
@Oz1988: The data access cursors (da.UpdateCursor etc.) are very fast so thousands of rows should not be a problem, it should finish in a few seconds. This is what they are designed to do. I know no other way.
– BERA
Jan 7 at 14:52
2
@Oz1988 If you had a large number of rows (tens to hundreds of millions), it would actually be much faster to set multiple values per row than to use the Field Calculator one column at a time. Your stated goal and intended methodology are incongruous.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:56
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "79"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f307790%2fupdate-records-with-arcpy-update-cursor-geodatabase-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I have a weird feeling that you are looking for arcpy.CalculateField_management
It is simple and quick calculate field help
Great idea.. TNX :)
– Oz1988
Jan 9 at 12:36
add a comment |
I have a weird feeling that you are looking for arcpy.CalculateField_management
It is simple and quick calculate field help
Great idea.. TNX :)
– Oz1988
Jan 9 at 12:36
add a comment |
I have a weird feeling that you are looking for arcpy.CalculateField_management
It is simple and quick calculate field help
I have a weird feeling that you are looking for arcpy.CalculateField_management
It is simple and quick calculate field help
answered Jan 7 at 14:57
ChrisLChrisL
369312
369312
Great idea.. TNX :)
– Oz1988
Jan 9 at 12:36
add a comment |
Great idea.. TNX :)
– Oz1988
Jan 9 at 12:36
Great idea.. TNX :)
– Oz1988
Jan 9 at 12:36
Great idea.. TNX :)
– Oz1988
Jan 9 at 12:36
add a comment |
Try the da.UpdateCursor:
import arcpy
feature_class = r'C:data.gdbfeatures1'
val1 = 123
val2 = 456
sql = """{0} > 100""".format(arcpy.AddFieldDelimiters(feature_class, 'ID'))
fields_to_update = ['Xcenter','Ycenter']
with arcpy.da.UpdateCursor(feature_class, fields_to_update, sql) as cursor:
for row in cursor:
row = val1, val2
cursor.updateRow(row)
First of all thank you Also in your program there is a loop that runs thousands of times (as many records) I'm looking for something to do it at once. The values I put are identical to all records so I do not want to run thousands of times in a loop
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:47
1
@Oz1988: The data access cursors (da.UpdateCursor etc.) are very fast so thousands of rows should not be a problem, it should finish in a few seconds. This is what they are designed to do. I know no other way.
– BERA
Jan 7 at 14:52
2
@Oz1988 If you had a large number of rows (tens to hundreds of millions), it would actually be much faster to set multiple values per row than to use the Field Calculator one column at a time. Your stated goal and intended methodology are incongruous.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:56
add a comment |
Try the da.UpdateCursor:
import arcpy
feature_class = r'C:data.gdbfeatures1'
val1 = 123
val2 = 456
sql = """{0} > 100""".format(arcpy.AddFieldDelimiters(feature_class, 'ID'))
fields_to_update = ['Xcenter','Ycenter']
with arcpy.da.UpdateCursor(feature_class, fields_to_update, sql) as cursor:
for row in cursor:
row = val1, val2
cursor.updateRow(row)
First of all thank you Also in your program there is a loop that runs thousands of times (as many records) I'm looking for something to do it at once. The values I put are identical to all records so I do not want to run thousands of times in a loop
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:47
1
@Oz1988: The data access cursors (da.UpdateCursor etc.) are very fast so thousands of rows should not be a problem, it should finish in a few seconds. This is what they are designed to do. I know no other way.
– BERA
Jan 7 at 14:52
2
@Oz1988 If you had a large number of rows (tens to hundreds of millions), it would actually be much faster to set multiple values per row than to use the Field Calculator one column at a time. Your stated goal and intended methodology are incongruous.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:56
add a comment |
Try the da.UpdateCursor:
import arcpy
feature_class = r'C:data.gdbfeatures1'
val1 = 123
val2 = 456
sql = """{0} > 100""".format(arcpy.AddFieldDelimiters(feature_class, 'ID'))
fields_to_update = ['Xcenter','Ycenter']
with arcpy.da.UpdateCursor(feature_class, fields_to_update, sql) as cursor:
for row in cursor:
row = val1, val2
cursor.updateRow(row)
Try the da.UpdateCursor:
import arcpy
feature_class = r'C:data.gdbfeatures1'
val1 = 123
val2 = 456
sql = """{0} > 100""".format(arcpy.AddFieldDelimiters(feature_class, 'ID'))
fields_to_update = ['Xcenter','Ycenter']
with arcpy.da.UpdateCursor(feature_class, fields_to_update, sql) as cursor:
for row in cursor:
row = val1, val2
cursor.updateRow(row)
edited Jan 7 at 14:53
answered Jan 7 at 14:40
BERABERA
15.3k52042
15.3k52042
First of all thank you Also in your program there is a loop that runs thousands of times (as many records) I'm looking for something to do it at once. The values I put are identical to all records so I do not want to run thousands of times in a loop
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:47
1
@Oz1988: The data access cursors (da.UpdateCursor etc.) are very fast so thousands of rows should not be a problem, it should finish in a few seconds. This is what they are designed to do. I know no other way.
– BERA
Jan 7 at 14:52
2
@Oz1988 If you had a large number of rows (tens to hundreds of millions), it would actually be much faster to set multiple values per row than to use the Field Calculator one column at a time. Your stated goal and intended methodology are incongruous.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:56
add a comment |
First of all thank you Also in your program there is a loop that runs thousands of times (as many records) I'm looking for something to do it at once. The values I put are identical to all records so I do not want to run thousands of times in a loop
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:47
1
@Oz1988: The data access cursors (da.UpdateCursor etc.) are very fast so thousands of rows should not be a problem, it should finish in a few seconds. This is what they are designed to do. I know no other way.
– BERA
Jan 7 at 14:52
2
@Oz1988 If you had a large number of rows (tens to hundreds of millions), it would actually be much faster to set multiple values per row than to use the Field Calculator one column at a time. Your stated goal and intended methodology are incongruous.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:56
First of all thank you Also in your program there is a loop that runs thousands of times (as many records) I'm looking for something to do it at once. The values I put are identical to all records so I do not want to run thousands of times in a loop
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:47
First of all thank you Also in your program there is a loop that runs thousands of times (as many records) I'm looking for something to do it at once. The values I put are identical to all records so I do not want to run thousands of times in a loop
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:47
1
1
@Oz1988: The data access cursors (da.UpdateCursor etc.) are very fast so thousands of rows should not be a problem, it should finish in a few seconds. This is what they are designed to do. I know no other way.
– BERA
Jan 7 at 14:52
@Oz1988: The data access cursors (da.UpdateCursor etc.) are very fast so thousands of rows should not be a problem, it should finish in a few seconds. This is what they are designed to do. I know no other way.
– BERA
Jan 7 at 14:52
2
2
@Oz1988 If you had a large number of rows (tens to hundreds of millions), it would actually be much faster to set multiple values per row than to use the Field Calculator one column at a time. Your stated goal and intended methodology are incongruous.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:56
@Oz1988 If you had a large number of rows (tens to hundreds of millions), it would actually be much faster to set multiple values per row than to use the Field Calculator one column at a time. Your stated goal and intended methodology are incongruous.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:56
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f307790%2fupdate-records-with-arcpy-update-cursor-geodatabase-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Please Edit the question to specify the data storage format of the target (file geodatabase, RDBMS, shapefile,...) and provide a sample of your existing code.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:27
1
Please add more code, since that fragment is missing cursor creation. Note that there are no versions of ArcGIS which aren't retired for which non-DataAccess cursors are appropriate. setRow is not supported on DataAcess cursor rows, and DataAcess cursors are much faster than the old, deprecated cursors. You also have indent issues.
– Vince
Jan 7 at 14:38
exactly. I mean thousands of records. I updated. Thanks
– Oz1988
Jan 7 at 14:51
What's wrong with a for loop? In essence, it's exactly what's going one behind the scenes of any other method, except, with a da cursor, it should be more efficient than using an unnecessary intermediary like CalculateField.
– Tom
Jan 7 at 15:53