LM386 motorboating that goes away with a resistor in parallel with the bypass capacitor on pin 7












4














I'm building a simple amplifier around a LM386. The circuit I'm using is this:





The input is on pin 1 of the connector and is a square wave coming from a digital pin on a NodeMCU devboard.



When I turn the circuit on, I can hear a low frequency oscilation on the speakers (not a constant tone, but as if the speaker was turned on and off a few times a second).



I tried adding a capacitor between the signal and ground as it seemed to work in this related question but I needed a fairly big capacitor (220uF) to get any result at all, and it only decreased the volume of the noise (not to mention it is filtering my input, if I understand it correctly).



What did get rid of the noise completely was adding a 1K resistor between pin 7 and ground (in parallel with the existing capacitor):





I have no idea why this works, but it gets rid of the noise completely.



So my main question is: what is this resistor in parallel with the capacitor doing and why does this remove the noise?



I'm happy to keep this solution if it makes sense, but first I need to understand why it works.










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    What you describe sounds like motorboating.
    – brhans
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:58










  • What sort of 9V battery are you using and do you have anything other than that 100nF C4 for supply decoupling?
    – brhans
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:01






  • 2




    R2 is not a good solution - it fouls up the DC biasing internally, which limits the available undistorted audio output power. Look at DC voltage on pin 5: it should be about half the supply, near +4.5V. I'll bet its a lot lower. Try increasing C4 instead to a very large capacitor > 200uF.
    – glen_geek
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:04












  • Use one of the circuits in the data sheet.
    – Leon Heller
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:18






  • 1




    What is the power source? What length of wire between the power source and the amplifier? As a kid, I built many amplifiers, with 4 or 5 or 6 stages gain, that oscillated because of VDD resistance (and impedance). When I added 5,000uF capacitors, installed directly at the final stage (that drove 1Kohm earphones), the motorboating finally ended and I could hear the thermal noise.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:05
















4














I'm building a simple amplifier around a LM386. The circuit I'm using is this:





The input is on pin 1 of the connector and is a square wave coming from a digital pin on a NodeMCU devboard.



When I turn the circuit on, I can hear a low frequency oscilation on the speakers (not a constant tone, but as if the speaker was turned on and off a few times a second).



I tried adding a capacitor between the signal and ground as it seemed to work in this related question but I needed a fairly big capacitor (220uF) to get any result at all, and it only decreased the volume of the noise (not to mention it is filtering my input, if I understand it correctly).



What did get rid of the noise completely was adding a 1K resistor between pin 7 and ground (in parallel with the existing capacitor):





I have no idea why this works, but it gets rid of the noise completely.



So my main question is: what is this resistor in parallel with the capacitor doing and why does this remove the noise?



I'm happy to keep this solution if it makes sense, but first I need to understand why it works.










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    What you describe sounds like motorboating.
    – brhans
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:58










  • What sort of 9V battery are you using and do you have anything other than that 100nF C4 for supply decoupling?
    – brhans
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:01






  • 2




    R2 is not a good solution - it fouls up the DC biasing internally, which limits the available undistorted audio output power. Look at DC voltage on pin 5: it should be about half the supply, near +4.5V. I'll bet its a lot lower. Try increasing C4 instead to a very large capacitor > 200uF.
    – glen_geek
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:04












  • Use one of the circuits in the data sheet.
    – Leon Heller
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:18






  • 1




    What is the power source? What length of wire between the power source and the amplifier? As a kid, I built many amplifiers, with 4 or 5 or 6 stages gain, that oscillated because of VDD resistance (and impedance). When I added 5,000uF capacitors, installed directly at the final stage (that drove 1Kohm earphones), the motorboating finally ended and I could hear the thermal noise.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:05














4












4








4







I'm building a simple amplifier around a LM386. The circuit I'm using is this:





The input is on pin 1 of the connector and is a square wave coming from a digital pin on a NodeMCU devboard.



When I turn the circuit on, I can hear a low frequency oscilation on the speakers (not a constant tone, but as if the speaker was turned on and off a few times a second).



I tried adding a capacitor between the signal and ground as it seemed to work in this related question but I needed a fairly big capacitor (220uF) to get any result at all, and it only decreased the volume of the noise (not to mention it is filtering my input, if I understand it correctly).



What did get rid of the noise completely was adding a 1K resistor between pin 7 and ground (in parallel with the existing capacitor):





I have no idea why this works, but it gets rid of the noise completely.



So my main question is: what is this resistor in parallel with the capacitor doing and why does this remove the noise?



I'm happy to keep this solution if it makes sense, but first I need to understand why it works.










share|improve this question















I'm building a simple amplifier around a LM386. The circuit I'm using is this:





The input is on pin 1 of the connector and is a square wave coming from a digital pin on a NodeMCU devboard.



When I turn the circuit on, I can hear a low frequency oscilation on the speakers (not a constant tone, but as if the speaker was turned on and off a few times a second).



I tried adding a capacitor between the signal and ground as it seemed to work in this related question but I needed a fairly big capacitor (220uF) to get any result at all, and it only decreased the volume of the noise (not to mention it is filtering my input, if I understand it correctly).



What did get rid of the noise completely was adding a 1K resistor between pin 7 and ground (in parallel with the existing capacitor):





I have no idea why this works, but it gets rid of the noise completely.



So my main question is: what is this resistor in parallel with the capacitor doing and why does this remove the noise?



I'm happy to keep this solution if it makes sense, but first I need to understand why it works.







amplifier lm386






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 26 '18 at 22:45







Flávio Amieiro

















asked Dec 26 '18 at 16:33









Flávio AmieiroFlávio Amieiro

1235




1235








  • 2




    What you describe sounds like motorboating.
    – brhans
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:58










  • What sort of 9V battery are you using and do you have anything other than that 100nF C4 for supply decoupling?
    – brhans
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:01






  • 2




    R2 is not a good solution - it fouls up the DC biasing internally, which limits the available undistorted audio output power. Look at DC voltage on pin 5: it should be about half the supply, near +4.5V. I'll bet its a lot lower. Try increasing C4 instead to a very large capacitor > 200uF.
    – glen_geek
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:04












  • Use one of the circuits in the data sheet.
    – Leon Heller
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:18






  • 1




    What is the power source? What length of wire between the power source and the amplifier? As a kid, I built many amplifiers, with 4 or 5 or 6 stages gain, that oscillated because of VDD resistance (and impedance). When I added 5,000uF capacitors, installed directly at the final stage (that drove 1Kohm earphones), the motorboating finally ended and I could hear the thermal noise.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:05














  • 2




    What you describe sounds like motorboating.
    – brhans
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:58










  • What sort of 9V battery are you using and do you have anything other than that 100nF C4 for supply decoupling?
    – brhans
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:01






  • 2




    R2 is not a good solution - it fouls up the DC biasing internally, which limits the available undistorted audio output power. Look at DC voltage on pin 5: it should be about half the supply, near +4.5V. I'll bet its a lot lower. Try increasing C4 instead to a very large capacitor > 200uF.
    – glen_geek
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:04












  • Use one of the circuits in the data sheet.
    – Leon Heller
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:18






  • 1




    What is the power source? What length of wire between the power source and the amplifier? As a kid, I built many amplifiers, with 4 or 5 or 6 stages gain, that oscillated because of VDD resistance (and impedance). When I added 5,000uF capacitors, installed directly at the final stage (that drove 1Kohm earphones), the motorboating finally ended and I could hear the thermal noise.
    – analogsystemsrf
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:05








2




2




What you describe sounds like motorboating.
– brhans
Dec 26 '18 at 16:58




What you describe sounds like motorboating.
– brhans
Dec 26 '18 at 16:58












What sort of 9V battery are you using and do you have anything other than that 100nF C4 for supply decoupling?
– brhans
Dec 26 '18 at 17:01




What sort of 9V battery are you using and do you have anything other than that 100nF C4 for supply decoupling?
– brhans
Dec 26 '18 at 17:01




2




2




R2 is not a good solution - it fouls up the DC biasing internally, which limits the available undistorted audio output power. Look at DC voltage on pin 5: it should be about half the supply, near +4.5V. I'll bet its a lot lower. Try increasing C4 instead to a very large capacitor > 200uF.
– glen_geek
Dec 26 '18 at 17:04






R2 is not a good solution - it fouls up the DC biasing internally, which limits the available undistorted audio output power. Look at DC voltage on pin 5: it should be about half the supply, near +4.5V. I'll bet its a lot lower. Try increasing C4 instead to a very large capacitor > 200uF.
– glen_geek
Dec 26 '18 at 17:04














Use one of the circuits in the data sheet.
– Leon Heller
Dec 26 '18 at 17:18




Use one of the circuits in the data sheet.
– Leon Heller
Dec 26 '18 at 17:18




1




1




What is the power source? What length of wire between the power source and the amplifier? As a kid, I built many amplifiers, with 4 or 5 or 6 stages gain, that oscillated because of VDD resistance (and impedance). When I added 5,000uF capacitors, installed directly at the final stage (that drove 1Kohm earphones), the motorboating finally ended and I could hear the thermal noise.
– analogsystemsrf
Dec 27 '18 at 19:05




What is the power source? What length of wire between the power source and the amplifier? As a kid, I built many amplifiers, with 4 or 5 or 6 stages gain, that oscillated because of VDD resistance (and impedance). When I added 5,000uF capacitors, installed directly at the final stage (that drove 1Kohm earphones), the motorboating finally ended and I could hear the thermal noise.
– analogsystemsrf
Dec 27 '18 at 19:05










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














The main problem is that you have the gain of the LM386 set much too high.



By putting a capacitor (C1) between pin 1 and 8 you have set the gain to 200 times. If the input signal is coming straight from a digital pin on the processor with 3.3V output you only need a gain of 2 at most.



With a gain of 200 the LM386 is amplifying small signals coming from the digital pin to an audible level.



Even if you remove C1 the gain will still be 20 times - you will need to attenuate the signal from the processor by about 10-11 times to avoid overloading the amplifier. A 10k resistor in series with the input and a 1k resistor to ground will achieve that. Even better would be a potentiometer to adjust the volume.



Your current solution is drastically altering the biasing of the LM386 such that it is not a linear amplifier, the digital signal is still able to break through the LM386 to drive the speaker. Please see page 1 of the data sheet LM386 datasheet



If you only need to drive the speaker with a square wave then you may not even need an amplifier. For low volume just a capacitor and resistor in series driving the speaker will function (for example a 47 ohm resistor and a 10uF capacitor). The resistor is to avoid overloading the digital output with the low resistance of the speaker while the capacitor removes the DC offset since the digital output is always positive (either 0V or 3.3V).






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your answer! Attenuating the input and reducing the gain to 20 (by removing C1) did help a lot. I can still hear the motorboating, but it is very faint. I had tried other simpler solutions, but I didn't get the volume I need. Also, the signal is a square wave for now, for testing, but that will definitely change in the future. My main problem is that I need it to be very loud (as loud as possible), even if that comes at the expense of sound quality. Removing C1 also did noticeably reduce the volume, which I want to avoid.
    – Flávio Amieiro
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:43



















1














You have 3 grounds the circuit:



the speaker ground



pins 4.3.2 ground (3 is where the 10K ohm attached to GND)



the RETURN of the 9v power
[which need to be tied together with heavy heavy wire]



and



(#4) the -pin of a 10,000 uF capacitor across the 9v power supply



You do have the 10,000uF bypass cap???






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    });
    }, "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f413891%2flm386-motorboating-that-goes-away-with-a-resistor-in-parallel-with-the-bypass-ca%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6














    The main problem is that you have the gain of the LM386 set much too high.



    By putting a capacitor (C1) between pin 1 and 8 you have set the gain to 200 times. If the input signal is coming straight from a digital pin on the processor with 3.3V output you only need a gain of 2 at most.



    With a gain of 200 the LM386 is amplifying small signals coming from the digital pin to an audible level.



    Even if you remove C1 the gain will still be 20 times - you will need to attenuate the signal from the processor by about 10-11 times to avoid overloading the amplifier. A 10k resistor in series with the input and a 1k resistor to ground will achieve that. Even better would be a potentiometer to adjust the volume.



    Your current solution is drastically altering the biasing of the LM386 such that it is not a linear amplifier, the digital signal is still able to break through the LM386 to drive the speaker. Please see page 1 of the data sheet LM386 datasheet



    If you only need to drive the speaker with a square wave then you may not even need an amplifier. For low volume just a capacitor and resistor in series driving the speaker will function (for example a 47 ohm resistor and a 10uF capacitor). The resistor is to avoid overloading the digital output with the low resistance of the speaker while the capacitor removes the DC offset since the digital output is always positive (either 0V or 3.3V).






    share|improve this answer























    • Thank you for your answer! Attenuating the input and reducing the gain to 20 (by removing C1) did help a lot. I can still hear the motorboating, but it is very faint. I had tried other simpler solutions, but I didn't get the volume I need. Also, the signal is a square wave for now, for testing, but that will definitely change in the future. My main problem is that I need it to be very loud (as loud as possible), even if that comes at the expense of sound quality. Removing C1 also did noticeably reduce the volume, which I want to avoid.
      – Flávio Amieiro
      Dec 26 '18 at 22:43
















    6














    The main problem is that you have the gain of the LM386 set much too high.



    By putting a capacitor (C1) between pin 1 and 8 you have set the gain to 200 times. If the input signal is coming straight from a digital pin on the processor with 3.3V output you only need a gain of 2 at most.



    With a gain of 200 the LM386 is amplifying small signals coming from the digital pin to an audible level.



    Even if you remove C1 the gain will still be 20 times - you will need to attenuate the signal from the processor by about 10-11 times to avoid overloading the amplifier. A 10k resistor in series with the input and a 1k resistor to ground will achieve that. Even better would be a potentiometer to adjust the volume.



    Your current solution is drastically altering the biasing of the LM386 such that it is not a linear amplifier, the digital signal is still able to break through the LM386 to drive the speaker. Please see page 1 of the data sheet LM386 datasheet



    If you only need to drive the speaker with a square wave then you may not even need an amplifier. For low volume just a capacitor and resistor in series driving the speaker will function (for example a 47 ohm resistor and a 10uF capacitor). The resistor is to avoid overloading the digital output with the low resistance of the speaker while the capacitor removes the DC offset since the digital output is always positive (either 0V or 3.3V).






    share|improve this answer























    • Thank you for your answer! Attenuating the input and reducing the gain to 20 (by removing C1) did help a lot. I can still hear the motorboating, but it is very faint. I had tried other simpler solutions, but I didn't get the volume I need. Also, the signal is a square wave for now, for testing, but that will definitely change in the future. My main problem is that I need it to be very loud (as loud as possible), even if that comes at the expense of sound quality. Removing C1 also did noticeably reduce the volume, which I want to avoid.
      – Flávio Amieiro
      Dec 26 '18 at 22:43














    6












    6








    6






    The main problem is that you have the gain of the LM386 set much too high.



    By putting a capacitor (C1) between pin 1 and 8 you have set the gain to 200 times. If the input signal is coming straight from a digital pin on the processor with 3.3V output you only need a gain of 2 at most.



    With a gain of 200 the LM386 is amplifying small signals coming from the digital pin to an audible level.



    Even if you remove C1 the gain will still be 20 times - you will need to attenuate the signal from the processor by about 10-11 times to avoid overloading the amplifier. A 10k resistor in series with the input and a 1k resistor to ground will achieve that. Even better would be a potentiometer to adjust the volume.



    Your current solution is drastically altering the biasing of the LM386 such that it is not a linear amplifier, the digital signal is still able to break through the LM386 to drive the speaker. Please see page 1 of the data sheet LM386 datasheet



    If you only need to drive the speaker with a square wave then you may not even need an amplifier. For low volume just a capacitor and resistor in series driving the speaker will function (for example a 47 ohm resistor and a 10uF capacitor). The resistor is to avoid overloading the digital output with the low resistance of the speaker while the capacitor removes the DC offset since the digital output is always positive (either 0V or 3.3V).






    share|improve this answer














    The main problem is that you have the gain of the LM386 set much too high.



    By putting a capacitor (C1) between pin 1 and 8 you have set the gain to 200 times. If the input signal is coming straight from a digital pin on the processor with 3.3V output you only need a gain of 2 at most.



    With a gain of 200 the LM386 is amplifying small signals coming from the digital pin to an audible level.



    Even if you remove C1 the gain will still be 20 times - you will need to attenuate the signal from the processor by about 10-11 times to avoid overloading the amplifier. A 10k resistor in series with the input and a 1k resistor to ground will achieve that. Even better would be a potentiometer to adjust the volume.



    Your current solution is drastically altering the biasing of the LM386 such that it is not a linear amplifier, the digital signal is still able to break through the LM386 to drive the speaker. Please see page 1 of the data sheet LM386 datasheet



    If you only need to drive the speaker with a square wave then you may not even need an amplifier. For low volume just a capacitor and resistor in series driving the speaker will function (for example a 47 ohm resistor and a 10uF capacitor). The resistor is to avoid overloading the digital output with the low resistance of the speaker while the capacitor removes the DC offset since the digital output is always positive (either 0V or 3.3V).







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Dec 26 '18 at 20:22

























    answered Dec 26 '18 at 20:04









    Kevin WhiteKevin White

    12.7k11521




    12.7k11521












    • Thank you for your answer! Attenuating the input and reducing the gain to 20 (by removing C1) did help a lot. I can still hear the motorboating, but it is very faint. I had tried other simpler solutions, but I didn't get the volume I need. Also, the signal is a square wave for now, for testing, but that will definitely change in the future. My main problem is that I need it to be very loud (as loud as possible), even if that comes at the expense of sound quality. Removing C1 also did noticeably reduce the volume, which I want to avoid.
      – Flávio Amieiro
      Dec 26 '18 at 22:43


















    • Thank you for your answer! Attenuating the input and reducing the gain to 20 (by removing C1) did help a lot. I can still hear the motorboating, but it is very faint. I had tried other simpler solutions, but I didn't get the volume I need. Also, the signal is a square wave for now, for testing, but that will definitely change in the future. My main problem is that I need it to be very loud (as loud as possible), even if that comes at the expense of sound quality. Removing C1 also did noticeably reduce the volume, which I want to avoid.
      – Flávio Amieiro
      Dec 26 '18 at 22:43
















    Thank you for your answer! Attenuating the input and reducing the gain to 20 (by removing C1) did help a lot. I can still hear the motorboating, but it is very faint. I had tried other simpler solutions, but I didn't get the volume I need. Also, the signal is a square wave for now, for testing, but that will definitely change in the future. My main problem is that I need it to be very loud (as loud as possible), even if that comes at the expense of sound quality. Removing C1 also did noticeably reduce the volume, which I want to avoid.
    – Flávio Amieiro
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:43




    Thank you for your answer! Attenuating the input and reducing the gain to 20 (by removing C1) did help a lot. I can still hear the motorboating, but it is very faint. I had tried other simpler solutions, but I didn't get the volume I need. Also, the signal is a square wave for now, for testing, but that will definitely change in the future. My main problem is that I need it to be very loud (as loud as possible), even if that comes at the expense of sound quality. Removing C1 also did noticeably reduce the volume, which I want to avoid.
    – Flávio Amieiro
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:43













    1














    You have 3 grounds the circuit:



    the speaker ground



    pins 4.3.2 ground (3 is where the 10K ohm attached to GND)



    the RETURN of the 9v power
    [which need to be tied together with heavy heavy wire]



    and



    (#4) the -pin of a 10,000 uF capacitor across the 9v power supply



    You do have the 10,000uF bypass cap???






    share|improve this answer


























      1














      You have 3 grounds the circuit:



      the speaker ground



      pins 4.3.2 ground (3 is where the 10K ohm attached to GND)



      the RETURN of the 9v power
      [which need to be tied together with heavy heavy wire]



      and



      (#4) the -pin of a 10,000 uF capacitor across the 9v power supply



      You do have the 10,000uF bypass cap???






      share|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        You have 3 grounds the circuit:



        the speaker ground



        pins 4.3.2 ground (3 is where the 10K ohm attached to GND)



        the RETURN of the 9v power
        [which need to be tied together with heavy heavy wire]



        and



        (#4) the -pin of a 10,000 uF capacitor across the 9v power supply



        You do have the 10,000uF bypass cap???






        share|improve this answer












        You have 3 grounds the circuit:



        the speaker ground



        pins 4.3.2 ground (3 is where the 10K ohm attached to GND)



        the RETURN of the 9v power
        [which need to be tied together with heavy heavy wire]



        and



        (#4) the -pin of a 10,000 uF capacitor across the 9v power supply



        You do have the 10,000uF bypass cap???







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 26 '18 at 18:44









        analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf

        13.8k2717




        13.8k2717






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f413891%2flm386-motorboating-that-goes-away-with-a-resistor-in-parallel-with-the-bypass-ca%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix