Integral of complex number over a contour
I have
$$int_{-1}^1 |z|dz$$
I need to calculate the integral where the integration contour is the upper semi-circle with unit radius. I calculated the integral in $(-1; 1)$ section; the answer is 1, but I'm not sure how to calculate for the upper semi-circle.
contour-integration complex-integration
add a comment |
I have
$$int_{-1}^1 |z|dz$$
I need to calculate the integral where the integration contour is the upper semi-circle with unit radius. I calculated the integral in $(-1; 1)$ section; the answer is 1, but I'm not sure how to calculate for the upper semi-circle.
contour-integration complex-integration
What is the upper semi-sphere? We're on a plane here.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 28 '18 at 19:00
Are you looking for $intlimits_gamma |z| dz$ where $gamma$ is semicircle in the upper half-plane?
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Do you mean semi circle?
– Cloud JR
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Yes, sorry, semi circle. Will update the post now. @Josh, yes
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:02
add a comment |
I have
$$int_{-1}^1 |z|dz$$
I need to calculate the integral where the integration contour is the upper semi-circle with unit radius. I calculated the integral in $(-1; 1)$ section; the answer is 1, but I'm not sure how to calculate for the upper semi-circle.
contour-integration complex-integration
I have
$$int_{-1}^1 |z|dz$$
I need to calculate the integral where the integration contour is the upper semi-circle with unit radius. I calculated the integral in $(-1; 1)$ section; the answer is 1, but I'm not sure how to calculate for the upper semi-circle.
contour-integration complex-integration
contour-integration complex-integration
edited Nov 28 '18 at 19:02
asked Nov 28 '18 at 18:53
user3132457
1336
1336
What is the upper semi-sphere? We're on a plane here.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 28 '18 at 19:00
Are you looking for $intlimits_gamma |z| dz$ where $gamma$ is semicircle in the upper half-plane?
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Do you mean semi circle?
– Cloud JR
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Yes, sorry, semi circle. Will update the post now. @Josh, yes
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:02
add a comment |
What is the upper semi-sphere? We're on a plane here.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 28 '18 at 19:00
Are you looking for $intlimits_gamma |z| dz$ where $gamma$ is semicircle in the upper half-plane?
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Do you mean semi circle?
– Cloud JR
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Yes, sorry, semi circle. Will update the post now. @Josh, yes
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:02
What is the upper semi-sphere? We're on a plane here.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 28 '18 at 19:00
What is the upper semi-sphere? We're on a plane here.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 28 '18 at 19:00
Are you looking for $intlimits_gamma |z| dz$ where $gamma$ is semicircle in the upper half-plane?
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Are you looking for $intlimits_gamma |z| dz$ where $gamma$ is semicircle in the upper half-plane?
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Do you mean semi circle?
– Cloud JR
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Do you mean semi circle?
– Cloud JR
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Yes, sorry, semi circle. Will update the post now. @Josh, yes
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:02
Yes, sorry, semi circle. Will update the post now. @Josh, yes
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:02
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Note: I think I may have been considering a different contour, since the original poster asked what they could do after finding $intlimits_{-1}^1 |z|dz$. I am thinking of a contour like this:
where $R=1$. If OP only requires the upper half, then we can disregard the $1$ in the final sum.
If you're taking $gamma$ to be this contour, note that $gamma$ is formed by two curves: $gamma_1$ and $gamma_2$ where $gamma_1$ is the interval $[-1,1]$ and $gamma_2$ is the upper arc of the semicircle. Thus we have that $$ intlimits_gamma |z| dz = intlimits_{gamma_1} |z|dz + intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz$$
You already found that $$ intlimits_{gamma_1} |z|dz = intlimits_{-1}^1 |z| dz = 1$$
We have to find $intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz$. Note that for all $z$ on $gamma_2$, $|z|=1$ because $z$ lies on the arc of the unit circle. So begin{align*}intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz = intlimits_{gamma_2}1dz = intlimits_0^pi ie^{itheta}dtheta = -2
end{align*}
So $$ intlimits_gamma |z| dz = -1$$
That's the contour I meant.
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
Apologies, I made a dumb error, let me fix that
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:23
I just don't understand how you get the π. Isn't $int_{gamma}1dz=z$, which is just 1?
– user3132457
Nov 29 '18 at 5:28
add a comment |
Are you integrating clockwise or anti-clockwise?
Assuming you're integrating anti-clockwise, use a substitution of $z=mathrm e^{mathrm i theta}$, where $0 le theta le pi$.
It follows that $mathrm dz = mathrm{ie}^{mathrm i theta}~mathrm dtheta$.
Hence $$int_C |z|~mathrm dz = int_0^{pi} |mathrm e^{mathrm i theta}| ~mathrm{ie}^{mathrm i theta}~mathrm dtheta = mathrm iint_0^{pi}mathrm e^{mathrm itheta}~mathrm dtheta$$
Given that the original integral is $int_{-1}^1$, I suspect the semicircle is actually supposed to be parametrized clockwise. (Also because your parametrization gives an answer of $-2$.)
– André 3000
Nov 28 '18 at 19:11
@André3000 I'm not sure. It's not clear from the OP. Most students, when integrating along the real line, have the lower limit less than the upper limit. (They don't realise that we're integrating along an oriented path.)
– Fly by Night
Nov 28 '18 at 19:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017545%2fintegral-of-complex-number-over-a-contour%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Note: I think I may have been considering a different contour, since the original poster asked what they could do after finding $intlimits_{-1}^1 |z|dz$. I am thinking of a contour like this:
where $R=1$. If OP only requires the upper half, then we can disregard the $1$ in the final sum.
If you're taking $gamma$ to be this contour, note that $gamma$ is formed by two curves: $gamma_1$ and $gamma_2$ where $gamma_1$ is the interval $[-1,1]$ and $gamma_2$ is the upper arc of the semicircle. Thus we have that $$ intlimits_gamma |z| dz = intlimits_{gamma_1} |z|dz + intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz$$
You already found that $$ intlimits_{gamma_1} |z|dz = intlimits_{-1}^1 |z| dz = 1$$
We have to find $intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz$. Note that for all $z$ on $gamma_2$, $|z|=1$ because $z$ lies on the arc of the unit circle. So begin{align*}intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz = intlimits_{gamma_2}1dz = intlimits_0^pi ie^{itheta}dtheta = -2
end{align*}
So $$ intlimits_gamma |z| dz = -1$$
That's the contour I meant.
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
Apologies, I made a dumb error, let me fix that
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:23
I just don't understand how you get the π. Isn't $int_{gamma}1dz=z$, which is just 1?
– user3132457
Nov 29 '18 at 5:28
add a comment |
Note: I think I may have been considering a different contour, since the original poster asked what they could do after finding $intlimits_{-1}^1 |z|dz$. I am thinking of a contour like this:
where $R=1$. If OP only requires the upper half, then we can disregard the $1$ in the final sum.
If you're taking $gamma$ to be this contour, note that $gamma$ is formed by two curves: $gamma_1$ and $gamma_2$ where $gamma_1$ is the interval $[-1,1]$ and $gamma_2$ is the upper arc of the semicircle. Thus we have that $$ intlimits_gamma |z| dz = intlimits_{gamma_1} |z|dz + intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz$$
You already found that $$ intlimits_{gamma_1} |z|dz = intlimits_{-1}^1 |z| dz = 1$$
We have to find $intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz$. Note that for all $z$ on $gamma_2$, $|z|=1$ because $z$ lies on the arc of the unit circle. So begin{align*}intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz = intlimits_{gamma_2}1dz = intlimits_0^pi ie^{itheta}dtheta = -2
end{align*}
So $$ intlimits_gamma |z| dz = -1$$
That's the contour I meant.
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
Apologies, I made a dumb error, let me fix that
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:23
I just don't understand how you get the π. Isn't $int_{gamma}1dz=z$, which is just 1?
– user3132457
Nov 29 '18 at 5:28
add a comment |
Note: I think I may have been considering a different contour, since the original poster asked what they could do after finding $intlimits_{-1}^1 |z|dz$. I am thinking of a contour like this:
where $R=1$. If OP only requires the upper half, then we can disregard the $1$ in the final sum.
If you're taking $gamma$ to be this contour, note that $gamma$ is formed by two curves: $gamma_1$ and $gamma_2$ where $gamma_1$ is the interval $[-1,1]$ and $gamma_2$ is the upper arc of the semicircle. Thus we have that $$ intlimits_gamma |z| dz = intlimits_{gamma_1} |z|dz + intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz$$
You already found that $$ intlimits_{gamma_1} |z|dz = intlimits_{-1}^1 |z| dz = 1$$
We have to find $intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz$. Note that for all $z$ on $gamma_2$, $|z|=1$ because $z$ lies on the arc of the unit circle. So begin{align*}intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz = intlimits_{gamma_2}1dz = intlimits_0^pi ie^{itheta}dtheta = -2
end{align*}
So $$ intlimits_gamma |z| dz = -1$$
Note: I think I may have been considering a different contour, since the original poster asked what they could do after finding $intlimits_{-1}^1 |z|dz$. I am thinking of a contour like this:
where $R=1$. If OP only requires the upper half, then we can disregard the $1$ in the final sum.
If you're taking $gamma$ to be this contour, note that $gamma$ is formed by two curves: $gamma_1$ and $gamma_2$ where $gamma_1$ is the interval $[-1,1]$ and $gamma_2$ is the upper arc of the semicircle. Thus we have that $$ intlimits_gamma |z| dz = intlimits_{gamma_1} |z|dz + intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz$$
You already found that $$ intlimits_{gamma_1} |z|dz = intlimits_{-1}^1 |z| dz = 1$$
We have to find $intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz$. Note that for all $z$ on $gamma_2$, $|z|=1$ because $z$ lies on the arc of the unit circle. So begin{align*}intlimits_{gamma_2}|z|dz = intlimits_{gamma_2}1dz = intlimits_0^pi ie^{itheta}dtheta = -2
end{align*}
So $$ intlimits_gamma |z| dz = -1$$
edited Nov 28 '18 at 19:26
answered Nov 28 '18 at 19:06
J. Pistachio
477212
477212
That's the contour I meant.
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
Apologies, I made a dumb error, let me fix that
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:23
I just don't understand how you get the π. Isn't $int_{gamma}1dz=z$, which is just 1?
– user3132457
Nov 29 '18 at 5:28
add a comment |
That's the contour I meant.
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
Apologies, I made a dumb error, let me fix that
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:23
I just don't understand how you get the π. Isn't $int_{gamma}1dz=z$, which is just 1?
– user3132457
Nov 29 '18 at 5:28
That's the contour I meant.
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
That's the contour I meant.
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:17
Apologies, I made a dumb error, let me fix that
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:23
Apologies, I made a dumb error, let me fix that
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:23
I just don't understand how you get the π. Isn't $int_{gamma}1dz=z$, which is just 1?
– user3132457
Nov 29 '18 at 5:28
I just don't understand how you get the π. Isn't $int_{gamma}1dz=z$, which is just 1?
– user3132457
Nov 29 '18 at 5:28
add a comment |
Are you integrating clockwise or anti-clockwise?
Assuming you're integrating anti-clockwise, use a substitution of $z=mathrm e^{mathrm i theta}$, where $0 le theta le pi$.
It follows that $mathrm dz = mathrm{ie}^{mathrm i theta}~mathrm dtheta$.
Hence $$int_C |z|~mathrm dz = int_0^{pi} |mathrm e^{mathrm i theta}| ~mathrm{ie}^{mathrm i theta}~mathrm dtheta = mathrm iint_0^{pi}mathrm e^{mathrm itheta}~mathrm dtheta$$
Given that the original integral is $int_{-1}^1$, I suspect the semicircle is actually supposed to be parametrized clockwise. (Also because your parametrization gives an answer of $-2$.)
– André 3000
Nov 28 '18 at 19:11
@André3000 I'm not sure. It's not clear from the OP. Most students, when integrating along the real line, have the lower limit less than the upper limit. (They don't realise that we're integrating along an oriented path.)
– Fly by Night
Nov 28 '18 at 19:13
add a comment |
Are you integrating clockwise or anti-clockwise?
Assuming you're integrating anti-clockwise, use a substitution of $z=mathrm e^{mathrm i theta}$, where $0 le theta le pi$.
It follows that $mathrm dz = mathrm{ie}^{mathrm i theta}~mathrm dtheta$.
Hence $$int_C |z|~mathrm dz = int_0^{pi} |mathrm e^{mathrm i theta}| ~mathrm{ie}^{mathrm i theta}~mathrm dtheta = mathrm iint_0^{pi}mathrm e^{mathrm itheta}~mathrm dtheta$$
Given that the original integral is $int_{-1}^1$, I suspect the semicircle is actually supposed to be parametrized clockwise. (Also because your parametrization gives an answer of $-2$.)
– André 3000
Nov 28 '18 at 19:11
@André3000 I'm not sure. It's not clear from the OP. Most students, when integrating along the real line, have the lower limit less than the upper limit. (They don't realise that we're integrating along an oriented path.)
– Fly by Night
Nov 28 '18 at 19:13
add a comment |
Are you integrating clockwise or anti-clockwise?
Assuming you're integrating anti-clockwise, use a substitution of $z=mathrm e^{mathrm i theta}$, where $0 le theta le pi$.
It follows that $mathrm dz = mathrm{ie}^{mathrm i theta}~mathrm dtheta$.
Hence $$int_C |z|~mathrm dz = int_0^{pi} |mathrm e^{mathrm i theta}| ~mathrm{ie}^{mathrm i theta}~mathrm dtheta = mathrm iint_0^{pi}mathrm e^{mathrm itheta}~mathrm dtheta$$
Are you integrating clockwise or anti-clockwise?
Assuming you're integrating anti-clockwise, use a substitution of $z=mathrm e^{mathrm i theta}$, where $0 le theta le pi$.
It follows that $mathrm dz = mathrm{ie}^{mathrm i theta}~mathrm dtheta$.
Hence $$int_C |z|~mathrm dz = int_0^{pi} |mathrm e^{mathrm i theta}| ~mathrm{ie}^{mathrm i theta}~mathrm dtheta = mathrm iint_0^{pi}mathrm e^{mathrm itheta}~mathrm dtheta$$
edited Nov 28 '18 at 19:16
answered Nov 28 '18 at 19:08
Fly by Night
25.7k32978
25.7k32978
Given that the original integral is $int_{-1}^1$, I suspect the semicircle is actually supposed to be parametrized clockwise. (Also because your parametrization gives an answer of $-2$.)
– André 3000
Nov 28 '18 at 19:11
@André3000 I'm not sure. It's not clear from the OP. Most students, when integrating along the real line, have the lower limit less than the upper limit. (They don't realise that we're integrating along an oriented path.)
– Fly by Night
Nov 28 '18 at 19:13
add a comment |
Given that the original integral is $int_{-1}^1$, I suspect the semicircle is actually supposed to be parametrized clockwise. (Also because your parametrization gives an answer of $-2$.)
– André 3000
Nov 28 '18 at 19:11
@André3000 I'm not sure. It's not clear from the OP. Most students, when integrating along the real line, have the lower limit less than the upper limit. (They don't realise that we're integrating along an oriented path.)
– Fly by Night
Nov 28 '18 at 19:13
Given that the original integral is $int_{-1}^1$, I suspect the semicircle is actually supposed to be parametrized clockwise. (Also because your parametrization gives an answer of $-2$.)
– André 3000
Nov 28 '18 at 19:11
Given that the original integral is $int_{-1}^1$, I suspect the semicircle is actually supposed to be parametrized clockwise. (Also because your parametrization gives an answer of $-2$.)
– André 3000
Nov 28 '18 at 19:11
@André3000 I'm not sure. It's not clear from the OP. Most students, when integrating along the real line, have the lower limit less than the upper limit. (They don't realise that we're integrating along an oriented path.)
– Fly by Night
Nov 28 '18 at 19:13
@André3000 I'm not sure. It's not clear from the OP. Most students, when integrating along the real line, have the lower limit less than the upper limit. (They don't realise that we're integrating along an oriented path.)
– Fly by Night
Nov 28 '18 at 19:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017545%2fintegral-of-complex-number-over-a-contour%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What is the upper semi-sphere? We're on a plane here.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 28 '18 at 19:00
Are you looking for $intlimits_gamma |z| dz$ where $gamma$ is semicircle in the upper half-plane?
– J. Pistachio
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Do you mean semi circle?
– Cloud JR
Nov 28 '18 at 19:01
Yes, sorry, semi circle. Will update the post now. @Josh, yes
– user3132457
Nov 28 '18 at 19:02