How/why does the contraction of standard volume form give the canonical form.












0












$begingroup$


$M subset mathbb{R}^{N}$ is a (oriented) $n-1$ dimensional submanifold. Suppose $nu in T_{p}M^{bot}$, of length one (a normal unit vector on $M$).



How and why does the contraction $nu_{neg}(dx_{1}wedge...wedge dx_{n})$ (yes the contraction symbol is reversed, sorry) give the canonical volume form, vol$_{M}$ (or vol$_{g}$ ) , on $M$?



There is a theorem that says that the vol$_{g}(p)$ can be written as $sqrt{det g_{ij }}dy_{1}wedge ... wedge dy_{n-1}$, where $y_i$ would be local coordinates of $M$. Do I need to do something with this. Or something with the fact that vol$_{g}(X_1,...,X_{n-1}) = 1$ for an oriented orthonormal basis ${X_1,...X_{n-1}}$ of $T_{p}M$. I'm kind of getting lost in what I can and have to use.



(The contraction was defined as $nu_{neg}alpha(v_1,...,v_{n-1}) = alpha(nu wedge v_1 wedge , ... , wedge v_{n-1})$, where $alpha$ is an n-form.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    $M subset mathbb{R}^{N}$ is a (oriented) $n-1$ dimensional submanifold. Suppose $nu in T_{p}M^{bot}$, of length one (a normal unit vector on $M$).



    How and why does the contraction $nu_{neg}(dx_{1}wedge...wedge dx_{n})$ (yes the contraction symbol is reversed, sorry) give the canonical volume form, vol$_{M}$ (or vol$_{g}$ ) , on $M$?



    There is a theorem that says that the vol$_{g}(p)$ can be written as $sqrt{det g_{ij }}dy_{1}wedge ... wedge dy_{n-1}$, where $y_i$ would be local coordinates of $M$. Do I need to do something with this. Or something with the fact that vol$_{g}(X_1,...,X_{n-1}) = 1$ for an oriented orthonormal basis ${X_1,...X_{n-1}}$ of $T_{p}M$. I'm kind of getting lost in what I can and have to use.



    (The contraction was defined as $nu_{neg}alpha(v_1,...,v_{n-1}) = alpha(nu wedge v_1 wedge , ... , wedge v_{n-1})$, where $alpha$ is an n-form.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      $M subset mathbb{R}^{N}$ is a (oriented) $n-1$ dimensional submanifold. Suppose $nu in T_{p}M^{bot}$, of length one (a normal unit vector on $M$).



      How and why does the contraction $nu_{neg}(dx_{1}wedge...wedge dx_{n})$ (yes the contraction symbol is reversed, sorry) give the canonical volume form, vol$_{M}$ (or vol$_{g}$ ) , on $M$?



      There is a theorem that says that the vol$_{g}(p)$ can be written as $sqrt{det g_{ij }}dy_{1}wedge ... wedge dy_{n-1}$, where $y_i$ would be local coordinates of $M$. Do I need to do something with this. Or something with the fact that vol$_{g}(X_1,...,X_{n-1}) = 1$ for an oriented orthonormal basis ${X_1,...X_{n-1}}$ of $T_{p}M$. I'm kind of getting lost in what I can and have to use.



      (The contraction was defined as $nu_{neg}alpha(v_1,...,v_{n-1}) = alpha(nu wedge v_1 wedge , ... , wedge v_{n-1})$, where $alpha$ is an n-form.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      $M subset mathbb{R}^{N}$ is a (oriented) $n-1$ dimensional submanifold. Suppose $nu in T_{p}M^{bot}$, of length one (a normal unit vector on $M$).



      How and why does the contraction $nu_{neg}(dx_{1}wedge...wedge dx_{n})$ (yes the contraction symbol is reversed, sorry) give the canonical volume form, vol$_{M}$ (or vol$_{g}$ ) , on $M$?



      There is a theorem that says that the vol$_{g}(p)$ can be written as $sqrt{det g_{ij }}dy_{1}wedge ... wedge dy_{n-1}$, where $y_i$ would be local coordinates of $M$. Do I need to do something with this. Or something with the fact that vol$_{g}(X_1,...,X_{n-1}) = 1$ for an oriented orthonormal basis ${X_1,...X_{n-1}}$ of $T_{p}M$. I'm kind of getting lost in what I can and have to use.



      (The contraction was defined as $nu_{neg}alpha(v_1,...,v_{n-1}) = alpha(nu wedge v_1 wedge , ... , wedge v_{n-1})$, where $alpha$ is an n-form.







      differential-geometry riemannian-geometry differential-forms orientation tangent-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 2 '18 at 11:31







      AkatsukiMaliki

















      asked Dec 2 '18 at 11:20









      AkatsukiMalikiAkatsukiMaliki

      308110




      308110






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          At every point $pin M$, you can extend an (oriented) orthonormal basis $v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ of $T_pM$ to an (oriented) orthonormal basis $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ of $T_pmathbb{R}^n$. So $$mathrm{d}vol_M(p)=v_1^flatwedgedotswedge v_{n-1}^flat=iota_nu(nu^flatwedge v_1^flatwedgedotswedge v_{n-1}^flat)=iota_numathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            what is dvol, and the superscript b, and what is $iota_nu$? sorry..
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 11:57










          • $begingroup$
            dvol is the volume form, the superscript $flat$ is the musical isomorphism $T_pto T^*p$ from the Riemannian metric, and $iota_nu$ is the interior multiplication by $nu$. MathJax does not have MnSymbol so there isn't a real way to get the interior product symbol (either $llcorner$ or $lrcorner$ orientation) to work properly.
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:00










          • $begingroup$
            I got even more confused. Could you perhaps explain it without the musical isomorphism? and also argue why the form you get on the submanifold is the canonical one?
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:06










          • $begingroup$
            Let me try another way. There is (at least locally) a 1-form $theta$ (which is morally $nu^flat$) with $theta_p$ annihilates $T_pM$, and for which $theta(nu)=1$. Then it suffices to check $thetawedgemathrm{d}vol_M=mathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}$, which amounts to the same statement as $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis of $mathbb{R}^n$ at point $p$.
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:15












          • $begingroup$
            is this essentially the same as saying, we have local coordinates $y_{1},...,y_{n-1}$ for $M$. so the standard volume form is $sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$. where $nu, y_1, ...., y_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$. so the volume form there is $dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$ ? and basically that $iota_{nu} ( dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}) = sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}/$ . Is this what I have to show?
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:29











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022515%2fhow-why-does-the-contraction-of-standard-volume-form-give-the-canonical-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          At every point $pin M$, you can extend an (oriented) orthonormal basis $v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ of $T_pM$ to an (oriented) orthonormal basis $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ of $T_pmathbb{R}^n$. So $$mathrm{d}vol_M(p)=v_1^flatwedgedotswedge v_{n-1}^flat=iota_nu(nu^flatwedge v_1^flatwedgedotswedge v_{n-1}^flat)=iota_numathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            what is dvol, and the superscript b, and what is $iota_nu$? sorry..
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 11:57










          • $begingroup$
            dvol is the volume form, the superscript $flat$ is the musical isomorphism $T_pto T^*p$ from the Riemannian metric, and $iota_nu$ is the interior multiplication by $nu$. MathJax does not have MnSymbol so there isn't a real way to get the interior product symbol (either $llcorner$ or $lrcorner$ orientation) to work properly.
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:00










          • $begingroup$
            I got even more confused. Could you perhaps explain it without the musical isomorphism? and also argue why the form you get on the submanifold is the canonical one?
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:06










          • $begingroup$
            Let me try another way. There is (at least locally) a 1-form $theta$ (which is morally $nu^flat$) with $theta_p$ annihilates $T_pM$, and for which $theta(nu)=1$. Then it suffices to check $thetawedgemathrm{d}vol_M=mathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}$, which amounts to the same statement as $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis of $mathbb{R}^n$ at point $p$.
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:15












          • $begingroup$
            is this essentially the same as saying, we have local coordinates $y_{1},...,y_{n-1}$ for $M$. so the standard volume form is $sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$. where $nu, y_1, ...., y_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$. so the volume form there is $dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$ ? and basically that $iota_{nu} ( dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}) = sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}/$ . Is this what I have to show?
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:29
















          0












          $begingroup$

          At every point $pin M$, you can extend an (oriented) orthonormal basis $v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ of $T_pM$ to an (oriented) orthonormal basis $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ of $T_pmathbb{R}^n$. So $$mathrm{d}vol_M(p)=v_1^flatwedgedotswedge v_{n-1}^flat=iota_nu(nu^flatwedge v_1^flatwedgedotswedge v_{n-1}^flat)=iota_numathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            what is dvol, and the superscript b, and what is $iota_nu$? sorry..
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 11:57










          • $begingroup$
            dvol is the volume form, the superscript $flat$ is the musical isomorphism $T_pto T^*p$ from the Riemannian metric, and $iota_nu$ is the interior multiplication by $nu$. MathJax does not have MnSymbol so there isn't a real way to get the interior product symbol (either $llcorner$ or $lrcorner$ orientation) to work properly.
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:00










          • $begingroup$
            I got even more confused. Could you perhaps explain it without the musical isomorphism? and also argue why the form you get on the submanifold is the canonical one?
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:06










          • $begingroup$
            Let me try another way. There is (at least locally) a 1-form $theta$ (which is morally $nu^flat$) with $theta_p$ annihilates $T_pM$, and for which $theta(nu)=1$. Then it suffices to check $thetawedgemathrm{d}vol_M=mathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}$, which amounts to the same statement as $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis of $mathbb{R}^n$ at point $p$.
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:15












          • $begingroup$
            is this essentially the same as saying, we have local coordinates $y_{1},...,y_{n-1}$ for $M$. so the standard volume form is $sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$. where $nu, y_1, ...., y_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$. so the volume form there is $dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$ ? and basically that $iota_{nu} ( dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}) = sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}/$ . Is this what I have to show?
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:29














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          At every point $pin M$, you can extend an (oriented) orthonormal basis $v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ of $T_pM$ to an (oriented) orthonormal basis $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ of $T_pmathbb{R}^n$. So $$mathrm{d}vol_M(p)=v_1^flatwedgedotswedge v_{n-1}^flat=iota_nu(nu^flatwedge v_1^flatwedgedotswedge v_{n-1}^flat)=iota_numathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          At every point $pin M$, you can extend an (oriented) orthonormal basis $v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ of $T_pM$ to an (oriented) orthonormal basis $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ of $T_pmathbb{R}^n$. So $$mathrm{d}vol_M(p)=v_1^flatwedgedotswedge v_{n-1}^flat=iota_nu(nu^flatwedge v_1^flatwedgedotswedge v_{n-1}^flat)=iota_numathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 2 '18 at 11:48









          user10354138user10354138

          7,3772925




          7,3772925












          • $begingroup$
            what is dvol, and the superscript b, and what is $iota_nu$? sorry..
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 11:57










          • $begingroup$
            dvol is the volume form, the superscript $flat$ is the musical isomorphism $T_pto T^*p$ from the Riemannian metric, and $iota_nu$ is the interior multiplication by $nu$. MathJax does not have MnSymbol so there isn't a real way to get the interior product symbol (either $llcorner$ or $lrcorner$ orientation) to work properly.
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:00










          • $begingroup$
            I got even more confused. Could you perhaps explain it without the musical isomorphism? and also argue why the form you get on the submanifold is the canonical one?
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:06










          • $begingroup$
            Let me try another way. There is (at least locally) a 1-form $theta$ (which is morally $nu^flat$) with $theta_p$ annihilates $T_pM$, and for which $theta(nu)=1$. Then it suffices to check $thetawedgemathrm{d}vol_M=mathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}$, which amounts to the same statement as $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis of $mathbb{R}^n$ at point $p$.
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:15












          • $begingroup$
            is this essentially the same as saying, we have local coordinates $y_{1},...,y_{n-1}$ for $M$. so the standard volume form is $sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$. where $nu, y_1, ...., y_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$. so the volume form there is $dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$ ? and basically that $iota_{nu} ( dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}) = sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}/$ . Is this what I have to show?
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:29


















          • $begingroup$
            what is dvol, and the superscript b, and what is $iota_nu$? sorry..
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 11:57










          • $begingroup$
            dvol is the volume form, the superscript $flat$ is the musical isomorphism $T_pto T^*p$ from the Riemannian metric, and $iota_nu$ is the interior multiplication by $nu$. MathJax does not have MnSymbol so there isn't a real way to get the interior product symbol (either $llcorner$ or $lrcorner$ orientation) to work properly.
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:00










          • $begingroup$
            I got even more confused. Could you perhaps explain it without the musical isomorphism? and also argue why the form you get on the submanifold is the canonical one?
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:06










          • $begingroup$
            Let me try another way. There is (at least locally) a 1-form $theta$ (which is morally $nu^flat$) with $theta_p$ annihilates $T_pM$, and for which $theta(nu)=1$. Then it suffices to check $thetawedgemathrm{d}vol_M=mathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}$, which amounts to the same statement as $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis of $mathbb{R}^n$ at point $p$.
            $endgroup$
            – user10354138
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:15












          • $begingroup$
            is this essentially the same as saying, we have local coordinates $y_{1},...,y_{n-1}$ for $M$. so the standard volume form is $sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$. where $nu, y_1, ...., y_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$. so the volume form there is $dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$ ? and basically that $iota_{nu} ( dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}) = sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}/$ . Is this what I have to show?
            $endgroup$
            – AkatsukiMaliki
            Dec 2 '18 at 12:29
















          $begingroup$
          what is dvol, and the superscript b, and what is $iota_nu$? sorry..
          $endgroup$
          – AkatsukiMaliki
          Dec 2 '18 at 11:57




          $begingroup$
          what is dvol, and the superscript b, and what is $iota_nu$? sorry..
          $endgroup$
          – AkatsukiMaliki
          Dec 2 '18 at 11:57












          $begingroup$
          dvol is the volume form, the superscript $flat$ is the musical isomorphism $T_pto T^*p$ from the Riemannian metric, and $iota_nu$ is the interior multiplication by $nu$. MathJax does not have MnSymbol so there isn't a real way to get the interior product symbol (either $llcorner$ or $lrcorner$ orientation) to work properly.
          $endgroup$
          – user10354138
          Dec 2 '18 at 12:00




          $begingroup$
          dvol is the volume form, the superscript $flat$ is the musical isomorphism $T_pto T^*p$ from the Riemannian metric, and $iota_nu$ is the interior multiplication by $nu$. MathJax does not have MnSymbol so there isn't a real way to get the interior product symbol (either $llcorner$ or $lrcorner$ orientation) to work properly.
          $endgroup$
          – user10354138
          Dec 2 '18 at 12:00












          $begingroup$
          I got even more confused. Could you perhaps explain it without the musical isomorphism? and also argue why the form you get on the submanifold is the canonical one?
          $endgroup$
          – AkatsukiMaliki
          Dec 2 '18 at 12:06




          $begingroup$
          I got even more confused. Could you perhaps explain it without the musical isomorphism? and also argue why the form you get on the submanifold is the canonical one?
          $endgroup$
          – AkatsukiMaliki
          Dec 2 '18 at 12:06












          $begingroup$
          Let me try another way. There is (at least locally) a 1-form $theta$ (which is morally $nu^flat$) with $theta_p$ annihilates $T_pM$, and for which $theta(nu)=1$. Then it suffices to check $thetawedgemathrm{d}vol_M=mathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}$, which amounts to the same statement as $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis of $mathbb{R}^n$ at point $p$.
          $endgroup$
          – user10354138
          Dec 2 '18 at 12:15






          $begingroup$
          Let me try another way. There is (at least locally) a 1-form $theta$ (which is morally $nu^flat$) with $theta_p$ annihilates $T_pM$, and for which $theta(nu)=1$. Then it suffices to check $thetawedgemathrm{d}vol_M=mathrm{d}vol_{mathbb{R}^n}$, which amounts to the same statement as $nu,v_1,dots,v_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis of $mathbb{R}^n$ at point $p$.
          $endgroup$
          – user10354138
          Dec 2 '18 at 12:15














          $begingroup$
          is this essentially the same as saying, we have local coordinates $y_{1},...,y_{n-1}$ for $M$. so the standard volume form is $sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$. where $nu, y_1, ...., y_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$. so the volume form there is $dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$ ? and basically that $iota_{nu} ( dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}) = sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}/$ . Is this what I have to show?
          $endgroup$
          – AkatsukiMaliki
          Dec 2 '18 at 12:29




          $begingroup$
          is this essentially the same as saying, we have local coordinates $y_{1},...,y_{n-1}$ for $M$. so the standard volume form is $sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$. where $nu, y_1, ...., y_{n-1}$ is an oriented orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$. so the volume form there is $dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}$ ? and basically that $iota_{nu} ( dnu wedge dy_{1} wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}) = sqrt{det g_{ij}}dy_1wedge , ..., wedge dy_{n-1}/$ . Is this what I have to show?
          $endgroup$
          – AkatsukiMaliki
          Dec 2 '18 at 12:29


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022515%2fhow-why-does-the-contraction-of-standard-volume-form-give-the-canonical-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

          Aardman Animations

          Are they similar matrix