How to log scaling applied by includegraphics?












2















I'm currently working on a large-ish document that contains a lot of screenshots. These range from relatively small dialog boxes or details of the screen to some very large overview pictures. I currently use the option width=textwidth for the larger screenshots to scale them down to fit the page (somewhat). I also need to apply some scaling to the other screenshots - some larger images need to be scaled down, some details need to be scaled up.



Now I would like to use a small set of scaling factors throughout the document. The screenshots are all taken from a single application, and I'd rather not have the font size and UI details change size from image to image. To achieve that, my current plan is to use only two or three fixed scaling factors throughout the document. I can apply these manually in the source code, but I need to determine the actual values first. For that, I was thinking about setting every image to width=textwidth, recording the actual scaling applied and then classifying and adjusting the scaling factors.



As far as I can see, the original size and the requested size of each image file is contained in the log file, but on separate lines and in a syntax that is not very parser-friendly. Is there a better way to log the actual scaling factor that is applied to the image?










share|improve this question























  • The term How to log scaling can be misunderstood as logarithmic scaling

    – Christian Hupfer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:20











  • @ChristianHupfer I know that "science" is a verb now, but "to logarithmic" is a new one to me...

    – vwegert
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:22











  • to logarithmic is of course no verb (as long as I am not errant), but given some usual laziness with titles here, the title can be misunderstood at first

    – Christian Hupfer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:24











  • If you use adjustimage from the adjustbox package the previous width of the image is provided as width dimension register which can be used with ifdimwidth>somevalue etc. You could also just store the image in a box and take the box size as indicator (which is what adjustbox acutally does).

    – Martin Scharrer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:29











  • and then there are the min width and max width keys provided by adjustbox which only scale if needed. Something like adjustimage{min width=0.5textwidth, max width=textwidth}{image file name} will work to ensure that images are neither to small or to large.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:31
















2















I'm currently working on a large-ish document that contains a lot of screenshots. These range from relatively small dialog boxes or details of the screen to some very large overview pictures. I currently use the option width=textwidth for the larger screenshots to scale them down to fit the page (somewhat). I also need to apply some scaling to the other screenshots - some larger images need to be scaled down, some details need to be scaled up.



Now I would like to use a small set of scaling factors throughout the document. The screenshots are all taken from a single application, and I'd rather not have the font size and UI details change size from image to image. To achieve that, my current plan is to use only two or three fixed scaling factors throughout the document. I can apply these manually in the source code, but I need to determine the actual values first. For that, I was thinking about setting every image to width=textwidth, recording the actual scaling applied and then classifying and adjusting the scaling factors.



As far as I can see, the original size and the requested size of each image file is contained in the log file, but on separate lines and in a syntax that is not very parser-friendly. Is there a better way to log the actual scaling factor that is applied to the image?










share|improve this question























  • The term How to log scaling can be misunderstood as logarithmic scaling

    – Christian Hupfer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:20











  • @ChristianHupfer I know that "science" is a verb now, but "to logarithmic" is a new one to me...

    – vwegert
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:22











  • to logarithmic is of course no verb (as long as I am not errant), but given some usual laziness with titles here, the title can be misunderstood at first

    – Christian Hupfer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:24











  • If you use adjustimage from the adjustbox package the previous width of the image is provided as width dimension register which can be used with ifdimwidth>somevalue etc. You could also just store the image in a box and take the box size as indicator (which is what adjustbox acutally does).

    – Martin Scharrer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:29











  • and then there are the min width and max width keys provided by adjustbox which only scale if needed. Something like adjustimage{min width=0.5textwidth, max width=textwidth}{image file name} will work to ensure that images are neither to small or to large.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:31














2












2








2








I'm currently working on a large-ish document that contains a lot of screenshots. These range from relatively small dialog boxes or details of the screen to some very large overview pictures. I currently use the option width=textwidth for the larger screenshots to scale them down to fit the page (somewhat). I also need to apply some scaling to the other screenshots - some larger images need to be scaled down, some details need to be scaled up.



Now I would like to use a small set of scaling factors throughout the document. The screenshots are all taken from a single application, and I'd rather not have the font size and UI details change size from image to image. To achieve that, my current plan is to use only two or three fixed scaling factors throughout the document. I can apply these manually in the source code, but I need to determine the actual values first. For that, I was thinking about setting every image to width=textwidth, recording the actual scaling applied and then classifying and adjusting the scaling factors.



As far as I can see, the original size and the requested size of each image file is contained in the log file, but on separate lines and in a syntax that is not very parser-friendly. Is there a better way to log the actual scaling factor that is applied to the image?










share|improve this question














I'm currently working on a large-ish document that contains a lot of screenshots. These range from relatively small dialog boxes or details of the screen to some very large overview pictures. I currently use the option width=textwidth for the larger screenshots to scale them down to fit the page (somewhat). I also need to apply some scaling to the other screenshots - some larger images need to be scaled down, some details need to be scaled up.



Now I would like to use a small set of scaling factors throughout the document. The screenshots are all taken from a single application, and I'd rather not have the font size and UI details change size from image to image. To achieve that, my current plan is to use only two or three fixed scaling factors throughout the document. I can apply these manually in the source code, but I need to determine the actual values first. For that, I was thinking about setting every image to width=textwidth, recording the actual scaling applied and then classifying and adjusting the scaling factors.



As far as I can see, the original size and the requested size of each image file is contained in the log file, but on separate lines and in a syntax that is not very parser-friendly. Is there a better way to log the actual scaling factor that is applied to the image?







graphics scaling includegraphics






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 30 '18 at 10:15









vwegertvwegert

1,28411131




1,28411131













  • The term How to log scaling can be misunderstood as logarithmic scaling

    – Christian Hupfer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:20











  • @ChristianHupfer I know that "science" is a verb now, but "to logarithmic" is a new one to me...

    – vwegert
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:22











  • to logarithmic is of course no verb (as long as I am not errant), but given some usual laziness with titles here, the title can be misunderstood at first

    – Christian Hupfer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:24











  • If you use adjustimage from the adjustbox package the previous width of the image is provided as width dimension register which can be used with ifdimwidth>somevalue etc. You could also just store the image in a box and take the box size as indicator (which is what adjustbox acutally does).

    – Martin Scharrer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:29











  • and then there are the min width and max width keys provided by adjustbox which only scale if needed. Something like adjustimage{min width=0.5textwidth, max width=textwidth}{image file name} will work to ensure that images are neither to small or to large.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:31



















  • The term How to log scaling can be misunderstood as logarithmic scaling

    – Christian Hupfer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:20











  • @ChristianHupfer I know that "science" is a verb now, but "to logarithmic" is a new one to me...

    – vwegert
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:22











  • to logarithmic is of course no verb (as long as I am not errant), but given some usual laziness with titles here, the title can be misunderstood at first

    – Christian Hupfer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:24











  • If you use adjustimage from the adjustbox package the previous width of the image is provided as width dimension register which can be used with ifdimwidth>somevalue etc. You could also just store the image in a box and take the box size as indicator (which is what adjustbox acutally does).

    – Martin Scharrer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:29











  • and then there are the min width and max width keys provided by adjustbox which only scale if needed. Something like adjustimage{min width=0.5textwidth, max width=textwidth}{image file name} will work to ensure that images are neither to small or to large.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Dec 30 '18 at 10:31

















The term How to log scaling can be misunderstood as logarithmic scaling

– Christian Hupfer
Dec 30 '18 at 10:20





The term How to log scaling can be misunderstood as logarithmic scaling

– Christian Hupfer
Dec 30 '18 at 10:20













@ChristianHupfer I know that "science" is a verb now, but "to logarithmic" is a new one to me...

– vwegert
Dec 30 '18 at 10:22





@ChristianHupfer I know that "science" is a verb now, but "to logarithmic" is a new one to me...

– vwegert
Dec 30 '18 at 10:22













to logarithmic is of course no verb (as long as I am not errant), but given some usual laziness with titles here, the title can be misunderstood at first

– Christian Hupfer
Dec 30 '18 at 10:24





to logarithmic is of course no verb (as long as I am not errant), but given some usual laziness with titles here, the title can be misunderstood at first

– Christian Hupfer
Dec 30 '18 at 10:24













If you use adjustimage from the adjustbox package the previous width of the image is provided as width dimension register which can be used with ifdimwidth>somevalue etc. You could also just store the image in a box and take the box size as indicator (which is what adjustbox acutally does).

– Martin Scharrer
Dec 30 '18 at 10:29





If you use adjustimage from the adjustbox package the previous width of the image is provided as width dimension register which can be used with ifdimwidth>somevalue etc. You could also just store the image in a box and take the box size as indicator (which is what adjustbox acutally does).

– Martin Scharrer
Dec 30 '18 at 10:29













and then there are the min width and max width keys provided by adjustbox which only scale if needed. Something like adjustimage{min width=0.5textwidth, max width=textwidth}{image file name} will work to ensure that images are neither to small or to large.

– Martin Scharrer
Dec 30 '18 at 10:31





and then there are the min width and max width keys provided by adjustbox which only scale if needed. Something like adjustimage{min width=0.5textwidth, max width=textwidth}{image file name} will work to ensure that images are neither to small or to large.

– Martin Scharrer
Dec 30 '18 at 10:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6














You could try this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{etoolbox}
makeatletter
apptoGPT@setup@scale{wlog{x-scale: Gin@scalex, y-scale: Gin@scaley}}
begin{document}
includegraphics[width=textwidth]{example-image-duck}

includegraphics[width=textwidth]{example-image-a}

end{document}


It will log



File: example-image-duck.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
x-scale: 1.8696, y-scale: 1.8696


and



File: example-image-a.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
x-scale: 1.07413, y-scale: 1.07413





share|improve this answer
























  • I'm struggling to understand what's going on inside the graphics/graphicx packages. Is something similar to Gin@filename available...?

    – vwegert
    Dec 30 '18 at 13:34











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467890%2fhow-to-log-scaling-applied-by-includegraphics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














You could try this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{etoolbox}
makeatletter
apptoGPT@setup@scale{wlog{x-scale: Gin@scalex, y-scale: Gin@scaley}}
begin{document}
includegraphics[width=textwidth]{example-image-duck}

includegraphics[width=textwidth]{example-image-a}

end{document}


It will log



File: example-image-duck.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
x-scale: 1.8696, y-scale: 1.8696


and



File: example-image-a.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
x-scale: 1.07413, y-scale: 1.07413





share|improve this answer
























  • I'm struggling to understand what's going on inside the graphics/graphicx packages. Is something similar to Gin@filename available...?

    – vwegert
    Dec 30 '18 at 13:34
















6














You could try this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{etoolbox}
makeatletter
apptoGPT@setup@scale{wlog{x-scale: Gin@scalex, y-scale: Gin@scaley}}
begin{document}
includegraphics[width=textwidth]{example-image-duck}

includegraphics[width=textwidth]{example-image-a}

end{document}


It will log



File: example-image-duck.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
x-scale: 1.8696, y-scale: 1.8696


and



File: example-image-a.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
x-scale: 1.07413, y-scale: 1.07413





share|improve this answer
























  • I'm struggling to understand what's going on inside the graphics/graphicx packages. Is something similar to Gin@filename available...?

    – vwegert
    Dec 30 '18 at 13:34














6












6








6







You could try this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{etoolbox}
makeatletter
apptoGPT@setup@scale{wlog{x-scale: Gin@scalex, y-scale: Gin@scaley}}
begin{document}
includegraphics[width=textwidth]{example-image-duck}

includegraphics[width=textwidth]{example-image-a}

end{document}


It will log



File: example-image-duck.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
x-scale: 1.8696, y-scale: 1.8696


and



File: example-image-a.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
x-scale: 1.07413, y-scale: 1.07413





share|improve this answer













You could try this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{etoolbox}
makeatletter
apptoGPT@setup@scale{wlog{x-scale: Gin@scalex, y-scale: Gin@scaley}}
begin{document}
includegraphics[width=textwidth]{example-image-duck}

includegraphics[width=textwidth]{example-image-a}

end{document}


It will log



File: example-image-duck.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
x-scale: 1.8696, y-scale: 1.8696


and



File: example-image-a.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
x-scale: 1.07413, y-scale: 1.07413






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 30 '18 at 11:38









Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer

188k7293673




188k7293673













  • I'm struggling to understand what's going on inside the graphics/graphicx packages. Is something similar to Gin@filename available...?

    – vwegert
    Dec 30 '18 at 13:34



















  • I'm struggling to understand what's going on inside the graphics/graphicx packages. Is something similar to Gin@filename available...?

    – vwegert
    Dec 30 '18 at 13:34

















I'm struggling to understand what's going on inside the graphics/graphicx packages. Is something similar to Gin@filename available...?

– vwegert
Dec 30 '18 at 13:34





I'm struggling to understand what's going on inside the graphics/graphicx packages. Is something similar to Gin@filename available...?

– vwegert
Dec 30 '18 at 13:34


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467890%2fhow-to-log-scaling-applied-by-includegraphics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix