N by N matrix of order 1
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I am looking at a paper by Slawomir Jarek called "REMOVING INCONSISTENCY IN PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRIX IN THE AHP" (http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.cejsh-fdb88af9-ba25-435f-9c85-3dcedcc7be57/c/mcdm16_11__5.pdf).
I do not see how a NxN matrix can have an order of 1. Thank you for your help.
matrices matrix-calculus
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I am looking at a paper by Slawomir Jarek called "REMOVING INCONSISTENCY IN PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRIX IN THE AHP" (http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.cejsh-fdb88af9-ba25-435f-9c85-3dcedcc7be57/c/mcdm16_11__5.pdf).
I do not see how a NxN matrix can have an order of 1. Thank you for your help.
matrices matrix-calculus
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I am looking at a paper by Slawomir Jarek called "REMOVING INCONSISTENCY IN PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRIX IN THE AHP" (http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.cejsh-fdb88af9-ba25-435f-9c85-3dcedcc7be57/c/mcdm16_11__5.pdf).
I do not see how a NxN matrix can have an order of 1. Thank you for your help.
matrices matrix-calculus
I am looking at a paper by Slawomir Jarek called "REMOVING INCONSISTENCY IN PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRIX IN THE AHP" (http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.cejsh-fdb88af9-ba25-435f-9c85-3dcedcc7be57/c/mcdm16_11__5.pdf).
I do not see how a NxN matrix can have an order of 1. Thank you for your help.
matrices matrix-calculus
matrices matrix-calculus
asked Nov 18 at 17:16
Ignacio Marés
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Thank you very much for your answer!
Can you please explain in a bit more detail the following step:
Thus, for each 1≤k≤n, the kth row of W is wk/w1 times its first row. Therefore there is only one linearly independent row in W, and W has rank 1.
Thank you again!
I've expanded my answer.
– Doug Chatham
Nov 20 at 0:35
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
It looks like a mistranslation. I think that ''order'' should be ''rank'', which is the number of linearly independent rows (or columns) in the square matrix.
The matrix that the paper says has order 1 is an $n times n$ matrix $W$ where, for each $1 leq i,j leq n$, the element $W_{ij}$ in the $i^{th}$ row and $j^{th}$ column is equal to $frac{w_{i}}{w_{j}}$, where $[w_{1} ldots w_{n}]$ is a given vector of $n$ elements. The first row of $W$ is $[ frac{w_{1}}{w_{1}} frac{w_{1}}{w_{2}} ldots frac{w_{1}}{w_{n}}]$. For each $2 leq k leq n$, the $k^{th}$ row of $W$ is $[ frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}} frac{w_{k}}{w_{2}} ldots frac{w_{k}}{w_{n}}]$, which is $frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}}$ times the first row. (So (row $k$) + ($-frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}}$ times row 1) is the zero row.) So any collection of two or more rows of $W$ is linearly dependent. Any linearly independent set of rows of $W$ has at most 1 element. Hence, $W$ has rank 1.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Thank you very much for your answer!
Can you please explain in a bit more detail the following step:
Thus, for each 1≤k≤n, the kth row of W is wk/w1 times its first row. Therefore there is only one linearly independent row in W, and W has rank 1.
Thank you again!
I've expanded my answer.
– Doug Chatham
Nov 20 at 0:35
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Thank you very much for your answer!
Can you please explain in a bit more detail the following step:
Thus, for each 1≤k≤n, the kth row of W is wk/w1 times its first row. Therefore there is only one linearly independent row in W, and W has rank 1.
Thank you again!
I've expanded my answer.
– Doug Chatham
Nov 20 at 0:35
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Thank you very much for your answer!
Can you please explain in a bit more detail the following step:
Thus, for each 1≤k≤n, the kth row of W is wk/w1 times its first row. Therefore there is only one linearly independent row in W, and W has rank 1.
Thank you again!
Thank you very much for your answer!
Can you please explain in a bit more detail the following step:
Thus, for each 1≤k≤n, the kth row of W is wk/w1 times its first row. Therefore there is only one linearly independent row in W, and W has rank 1.
Thank you again!
answered Nov 19 at 22:14
Ignacio Marés
1
1
I've expanded my answer.
– Doug Chatham
Nov 20 at 0:35
add a comment |
I've expanded my answer.
– Doug Chatham
Nov 20 at 0:35
I've expanded my answer.
– Doug Chatham
Nov 20 at 0:35
I've expanded my answer.
– Doug Chatham
Nov 20 at 0:35
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
It looks like a mistranslation. I think that ''order'' should be ''rank'', which is the number of linearly independent rows (or columns) in the square matrix.
The matrix that the paper says has order 1 is an $n times n$ matrix $W$ where, for each $1 leq i,j leq n$, the element $W_{ij}$ in the $i^{th}$ row and $j^{th}$ column is equal to $frac{w_{i}}{w_{j}}$, where $[w_{1} ldots w_{n}]$ is a given vector of $n$ elements. The first row of $W$ is $[ frac{w_{1}}{w_{1}} frac{w_{1}}{w_{2}} ldots frac{w_{1}}{w_{n}}]$. For each $2 leq k leq n$, the $k^{th}$ row of $W$ is $[ frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}} frac{w_{k}}{w_{2}} ldots frac{w_{k}}{w_{n}}]$, which is $frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}}$ times the first row. (So (row $k$) + ($-frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}}$ times row 1) is the zero row.) So any collection of two or more rows of $W$ is linearly dependent. Any linearly independent set of rows of $W$ has at most 1 element. Hence, $W$ has rank 1.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
It looks like a mistranslation. I think that ''order'' should be ''rank'', which is the number of linearly independent rows (or columns) in the square matrix.
The matrix that the paper says has order 1 is an $n times n$ matrix $W$ where, for each $1 leq i,j leq n$, the element $W_{ij}$ in the $i^{th}$ row and $j^{th}$ column is equal to $frac{w_{i}}{w_{j}}$, where $[w_{1} ldots w_{n}]$ is a given vector of $n$ elements. The first row of $W$ is $[ frac{w_{1}}{w_{1}} frac{w_{1}}{w_{2}} ldots frac{w_{1}}{w_{n}}]$. For each $2 leq k leq n$, the $k^{th}$ row of $W$ is $[ frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}} frac{w_{k}}{w_{2}} ldots frac{w_{k}}{w_{n}}]$, which is $frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}}$ times the first row. (So (row $k$) + ($-frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}}$ times row 1) is the zero row.) So any collection of two or more rows of $W$ is linearly dependent. Any linearly independent set of rows of $W$ has at most 1 element. Hence, $W$ has rank 1.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
It looks like a mistranslation. I think that ''order'' should be ''rank'', which is the number of linearly independent rows (or columns) in the square matrix.
The matrix that the paper says has order 1 is an $n times n$ matrix $W$ where, for each $1 leq i,j leq n$, the element $W_{ij}$ in the $i^{th}$ row and $j^{th}$ column is equal to $frac{w_{i}}{w_{j}}$, where $[w_{1} ldots w_{n}]$ is a given vector of $n$ elements. The first row of $W$ is $[ frac{w_{1}}{w_{1}} frac{w_{1}}{w_{2}} ldots frac{w_{1}}{w_{n}}]$. For each $2 leq k leq n$, the $k^{th}$ row of $W$ is $[ frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}} frac{w_{k}}{w_{2}} ldots frac{w_{k}}{w_{n}}]$, which is $frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}}$ times the first row. (So (row $k$) + ($-frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}}$ times row 1) is the zero row.) So any collection of two or more rows of $W$ is linearly dependent. Any linearly independent set of rows of $W$ has at most 1 element. Hence, $W$ has rank 1.
It looks like a mistranslation. I think that ''order'' should be ''rank'', which is the number of linearly independent rows (or columns) in the square matrix.
The matrix that the paper says has order 1 is an $n times n$ matrix $W$ where, for each $1 leq i,j leq n$, the element $W_{ij}$ in the $i^{th}$ row and $j^{th}$ column is equal to $frac{w_{i}}{w_{j}}$, where $[w_{1} ldots w_{n}]$ is a given vector of $n$ elements. The first row of $W$ is $[ frac{w_{1}}{w_{1}} frac{w_{1}}{w_{2}} ldots frac{w_{1}}{w_{n}}]$. For each $2 leq k leq n$, the $k^{th}$ row of $W$ is $[ frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}} frac{w_{k}}{w_{2}} ldots frac{w_{k}}{w_{n}}]$, which is $frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}}$ times the first row. (So (row $k$) + ($-frac{w_{k}}{w_{1}}$ times row 1) is the zero row.) So any collection of two or more rows of $W$ is linearly dependent. Any linearly independent set of rows of $W$ has at most 1 element. Hence, $W$ has rank 1.
edited Nov 20 at 0:35
answered Nov 18 at 18:09
Doug Chatham
1,2041916
1,2041916
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003815%2fn-by-n-matrix-of-order-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown