By using the definition of limit only, prove that $lim_{xrightarrow 0} frac1{3x+1} = 1$
By using the definition of a limit only, prove that
$lim_{xrightarrow 0} dfrac{1}{3x+1} = 1$
We need to find $$0<left|xright|<deltaquadimpliesquadleft|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|<epsilon.$$
I have simplified $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|$ down to $left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|$
Then since ${xrightarrow 0}$ we can assume $-1<x<1$ then $-2<3x+1<4$ which implies $$left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|<left|dfrac{-3delta}{4}right|=epsilon$$
No sure if the solution is correct
calculus limits epsilon-delta
add a comment |
By using the definition of a limit only, prove that
$lim_{xrightarrow 0} dfrac{1}{3x+1} = 1$
We need to find $$0<left|xright|<deltaquadimpliesquadleft|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|<epsilon.$$
I have simplified $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|$ down to $left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|$
Then since ${xrightarrow 0}$ we can assume $-1<x<1$ then $-2<3x+1<4$ which implies $$left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|<left|dfrac{-3delta}{4}right|=epsilon$$
No sure if the solution is correct
calculus limits epsilon-delta
The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
– Ovi
Aug 14 '17 at 21:59
add a comment |
By using the definition of a limit only, prove that
$lim_{xrightarrow 0} dfrac{1}{3x+1} = 1$
We need to find $$0<left|xright|<deltaquadimpliesquadleft|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|<epsilon.$$
I have simplified $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|$ down to $left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|$
Then since ${xrightarrow 0}$ we can assume $-1<x<1$ then $-2<3x+1<4$ which implies $$left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|<left|dfrac{-3delta}{4}right|=epsilon$$
No sure if the solution is correct
calculus limits epsilon-delta
By using the definition of a limit only, prove that
$lim_{xrightarrow 0} dfrac{1}{3x+1} = 1$
We need to find $$0<left|xright|<deltaquadimpliesquadleft|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|<epsilon.$$
I have simplified $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|$ down to $left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|$
Then since ${xrightarrow 0}$ we can assume $-1<x<1$ then $-2<3x+1<4$ which implies $$left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|<left|dfrac{-3delta}{4}right|=epsilon$$
No sure if the solution is correct
calculus limits epsilon-delta
calculus limits epsilon-delta
edited Nov 27 at 12:15
Martin Sleziak
44.7k7115270
44.7k7115270
asked Aug 14 '17 at 21:50
Ben Jones
19111
19111
The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
– Ovi
Aug 14 '17 at 21:59
add a comment |
The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
– Ovi
Aug 14 '17 at 21:59
The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
– Ovi
Aug 14 '17 at 21:59
The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
– Ovi
Aug 14 '17 at 21:59
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
If we focus on $-1<x<1$ and end up with $-2<3x+1 < 4$, $frac{1}{3x+1}$is unbounded.
Rather than focusing on $-1 < x < 1$, focus on a smaller interval, for example $|x| < frac14$. Hence $delta < frac14$.
if $-frac14 < x < frac14$, $$-frac34+1 < 3x+1< frac34+1$$.
$$frac14 < 3x+1< frac74$$
$$left|frac{1}{3x+4} right| < 4$$
Hence $$12delta < epsilon$$
add a comment |
Note that
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|=left|frac{3x}{1+3x}right| tag 1$$
Now, we restrict $x$ such that $xin [-1/4,1/4]$. And with this restriction, it is easy to see that $1/4/ le 1+3x$. Using this in $(1)$ reveals that
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|le 12|x|tag 2$$
Finally, given any $epsilon>0$,
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|<epsilon$$
whenever $|x|<delta =minleft(frac14,frac{epsilon}{12}right)$.
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
– Mark Viola
Aug 18 '17 at 16:00
add a comment |
No. If we assume $-1 < x < 1$, then $-2 < 3x + 1 < 4$. Since $3x+1=0$ is within those limits, then $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$ will be unbounded.
If you want to put an upper bound on $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$, then you are going to need something like $3x + 1 > frac 13$, which is equivalent to
$x > -frac 29$.
So, $|x| < frac 29 implies 3x+1 > frac 13 implies
left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|<3$.
So, then, $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|
< |9x|$
To make that less than $epsilon$, we need to have $|x|<frac 19 epsilon$.
So we need to have $delta < frac 19epsilon$ and $delta < frac 29$.
Hence we define $delta = min(frac 19epsilon, frac 29)$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2393756%2fby-using-the-definition-of-limit-only-prove-that-lim-x-rightarrow-0-frac1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If we focus on $-1<x<1$ and end up with $-2<3x+1 < 4$, $frac{1}{3x+1}$is unbounded.
Rather than focusing on $-1 < x < 1$, focus on a smaller interval, for example $|x| < frac14$. Hence $delta < frac14$.
if $-frac14 < x < frac14$, $$-frac34+1 < 3x+1< frac34+1$$.
$$frac14 < 3x+1< frac74$$
$$left|frac{1}{3x+4} right| < 4$$
Hence $$12delta < epsilon$$
add a comment |
If we focus on $-1<x<1$ and end up with $-2<3x+1 < 4$, $frac{1}{3x+1}$is unbounded.
Rather than focusing on $-1 < x < 1$, focus on a smaller interval, for example $|x| < frac14$. Hence $delta < frac14$.
if $-frac14 < x < frac14$, $$-frac34+1 < 3x+1< frac34+1$$.
$$frac14 < 3x+1< frac74$$
$$left|frac{1}{3x+4} right| < 4$$
Hence $$12delta < epsilon$$
add a comment |
If we focus on $-1<x<1$ and end up with $-2<3x+1 < 4$, $frac{1}{3x+1}$is unbounded.
Rather than focusing on $-1 < x < 1$, focus on a smaller interval, for example $|x| < frac14$. Hence $delta < frac14$.
if $-frac14 < x < frac14$, $$-frac34+1 < 3x+1< frac34+1$$.
$$frac14 < 3x+1< frac74$$
$$left|frac{1}{3x+4} right| < 4$$
Hence $$12delta < epsilon$$
If we focus on $-1<x<1$ and end up with $-2<3x+1 < 4$, $frac{1}{3x+1}$is unbounded.
Rather than focusing on $-1 < x < 1$, focus on a smaller interval, for example $|x| < frac14$. Hence $delta < frac14$.
if $-frac14 < x < frac14$, $$-frac34+1 < 3x+1< frac34+1$$.
$$frac14 < 3x+1< frac74$$
$$left|frac{1}{3x+4} right| < 4$$
Hence $$12delta < epsilon$$
edited Aug 14 '17 at 22:06
answered Aug 14 '17 at 21:59
Siong Thye Goh
99.1k1464117
99.1k1464117
add a comment |
add a comment |
Note that
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|=left|frac{3x}{1+3x}right| tag 1$$
Now, we restrict $x$ such that $xin [-1/4,1/4]$. And with this restriction, it is easy to see that $1/4/ le 1+3x$. Using this in $(1)$ reveals that
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|le 12|x|tag 2$$
Finally, given any $epsilon>0$,
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|<epsilon$$
whenever $|x|<delta =minleft(frac14,frac{epsilon}{12}right)$.
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
– Mark Viola
Aug 18 '17 at 16:00
add a comment |
Note that
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|=left|frac{3x}{1+3x}right| tag 1$$
Now, we restrict $x$ such that $xin [-1/4,1/4]$. And with this restriction, it is easy to see that $1/4/ le 1+3x$. Using this in $(1)$ reveals that
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|le 12|x|tag 2$$
Finally, given any $epsilon>0$,
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|<epsilon$$
whenever $|x|<delta =minleft(frac14,frac{epsilon}{12}right)$.
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
– Mark Viola
Aug 18 '17 at 16:00
add a comment |
Note that
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|=left|frac{3x}{1+3x}right| tag 1$$
Now, we restrict $x$ such that $xin [-1/4,1/4]$. And with this restriction, it is easy to see that $1/4/ le 1+3x$. Using this in $(1)$ reveals that
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|le 12|x|tag 2$$
Finally, given any $epsilon>0$,
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|<epsilon$$
whenever $|x|<delta =minleft(frac14,frac{epsilon}{12}right)$.
Note that
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|=left|frac{3x}{1+3x}right| tag 1$$
Now, we restrict $x$ such that $xin [-1/4,1/4]$. And with this restriction, it is easy to see that $1/4/ le 1+3x$. Using this in $(1)$ reveals that
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|le 12|x|tag 2$$
Finally, given any $epsilon>0$,
$$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|<epsilon$$
whenever $|x|<delta =minleft(frac14,frac{epsilon}{12}right)$.
answered Aug 14 '17 at 21:59
Mark Viola
130k1274170
130k1274170
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
– Mark Viola
Aug 18 '17 at 16:00
add a comment |
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
– Mark Viola
Aug 18 '17 at 16:00
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
– Mark Viola
Aug 18 '17 at 16:00
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
– Mark Viola
Aug 18 '17 at 16:00
add a comment |
No. If we assume $-1 < x < 1$, then $-2 < 3x + 1 < 4$. Since $3x+1=0$ is within those limits, then $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$ will be unbounded.
If you want to put an upper bound on $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$, then you are going to need something like $3x + 1 > frac 13$, which is equivalent to
$x > -frac 29$.
So, $|x| < frac 29 implies 3x+1 > frac 13 implies
left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|<3$.
So, then, $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|
< |9x|$
To make that less than $epsilon$, we need to have $|x|<frac 19 epsilon$.
So we need to have $delta < frac 19epsilon$ and $delta < frac 29$.
Hence we define $delta = min(frac 19epsilon, frac 29)$
add a comment |
No. If we assume $-1 < x < 1$, then $-2 < 3x + 1 < 4$. Since $3x+1=0$ is within those limits, then $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$ will be unbounded.
If you want to put an upper bound on $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$, then you are going to need something like $3x + 1 > frac 13$, which is equivalent to
$x > -frac 29$.
So, $|x| < frac 29 implies 3x+1 > frac 13 implies
left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|<3$.
So, then, $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|
< |9x|$
To make that less than $epsilon$, we need to have $|x|<frac 19 epsilon$.
So we need to have $delta < frac 19epsilon$ and $delta < frac 29$.
Hence we define $delta = min(frac 19epsilon, frac 29)$
add a comment |
No. If we assume $-1 < x < 1$, then $-2 < 3x + 1 < 4$. Since $3x+1=0$ is within those limits, then $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$ will be unbounded.
If you want to put an upper bound on $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$, then you are going to need something like $3x + 1 > frac 13$, which is equivalent to
$x > -frac 29$.
So, $|x| < frac 29 implies 3x+1 > frac 13 implies
left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|<3$.
So, then, $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|
< |9x|$
To make that less than $epsilon$, we need to have $|x|<frac 19 epsilon$.
So we need to have $delta < frac 19epsilon$ and $delta < frac 29$.
Hence we define $delta = min(frac 19epsilon, frac 29)$
No. If we assume $-1 < x < 1$, then $-2 < 3x + 1 < 4$. Since $3x+1=0$ is within those limits, then $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$ will be unbounded.
If you want to put an upper bound on $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$, then you are going to need something like $3x + 1 > frac 13$, which is equivalent to
$x > -frac 29$.
So, $|x| < frac 29 implies 3x+1 > frac 13 implies
left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|<3$.
So, then, $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|
< |9x|$
To make that less than $epsilon$, we need to have $|x|<frac 19 epsilon$.
So we need to have $delta < frac 19epsilon$ and $delta < frac 29$.
Hence we define $delta = min(frac 19epsilon, frac 29)$
answered Aug 14 '17 at 23:21
steven gregory
17.7k32257
17.7k32257
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2393756%2fby-using-the-definition-of-limit-only-prove-that-lim-x-rightarrow-0-frac1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
– Ovi
Aug 14 '17 at 21:59