Spectrum of a ring homeomorphic to a compact, totally disconnected space
Let $X$ be a compact, totally disconnected space.
It must be shown that $X$ is homeomorphic to $mathrm{Spec}(A)$, where
$$ A:=C(X, mathbb{Z}_2), $$
and $mathbb{Z}_2$ is endowed with the discrete topology.
At first, it is easy to see that $A={ chi_S: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X }$ (no matter how ugly or cool $X$ is)[further, such $A$ is a boolean ring]
And, naturally, there is a correspondence $${ chi_S: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X } rightleftarrows { Ssubseteq X: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X }=:Gamma_X $$
I think I've read somewhere (sorry, I forgot where), that if $B$ is a boolean ring, then $B$ is isomorphic to $Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(B)}$. Let us denote this result by $(*)$.
I think that, under the assumption of $(*)$, $Acong Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}$, but if $X$ is totally disconnected, then $Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}=mathrm{Spec}(A)$, is this right ?
Also, $X$ is in a one-to-one correspondence with ${ chi_{{x } }: xin X }$, which gives us
$$ Xcong AcongGamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}=mathrm{Spec}(A). $$
I've not checked continuity yet, which shouldn't be too complicated. I'm stuck at this point because $Acong mathrm{Spec}(A)$ shocks me.
Can you help me, please?
Is my reasoning right?
general-topology algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra zariski-topology
add a comment |
Let $X$ be a compact, totally disconnected space.
It must be shown that $X$ is homeomorphic to $mathrm{Spec}(A)$, where
$$ A:=C(X, mathbb{Z}_2), $$
and $mathbb{Z}_2$ is endowed with the discrete topology.
At first, it is easy to see that $A={ chi_S: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X }$ (no matter how ugly or cool $X$ is)[further, such $A$ is a boolean ring]
And, naturally, there is a correspondence $${ chi_S: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X } rightleftarrows { Ssubseteq X: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X }=:Gamma_X $$
I think I've read somewhere (sorry, I forgot where), that if $B$ is a boolean ring, then $B$ is isomorphic to $Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(B)}$. Let us denote this result by $(*)$.
I think that, under the assumption of $(*)$, $Acong Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}$, but if $X$ is totally disconnected, then $Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}=mathrm{Spec}(A)$, is this right ?
Also, $X$ is in a one-to-one correspondence with ${ chi_{{x } }: xin X }$, which gives us
$$ Xcong AcongGamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}=mathrm{Spec}(A). $$
I've not checked continuity yet, which shouldn't be too complicated. I'm stuck at this point because $Acong mathrm{Spec}(A)$ shocks me.
Can you help me, please?
Is my reasoning right?
general-topology algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra zariski-topology
$(*)$ is called Stone's representation theorem.
– Armando j18eos
Nov 23 '16 at 15:01
add a comment |
Let $X$ be a compact, totally disconnected space.
It must be shown that $X$ is homeomorphic to $mathrm{Spec}(A)$, where
$$ A:=C(X, mathbb{Z}_2), $$
and $mathbb{Z}_2$ is endowed with the discrete topology.
At first, it is easy to see that $A={ chi_S: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X }$ (no matter how ugly or cool $X$ is)[further, such $A$ is a boolean ring]
And, naturally, there is a correspondence $${ chi_S: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X } rightleftarrows { Ssubseteq X: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X }=:Gamma_X $$
I think I've read somewhere (sorry, I forgot where), that if $B$ is a boolean ring, then $B$ is isomorphic to $Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(B)}$. Let us denote this result by $(*)$.
I think that, under the assumption of $(*)$, $Acong Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}$, but if $X$ is totally disconnected, then $Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}=mathrm{Spec}(A)$, is this right ?
Also, $X$ is in a one-to-one correspondence with ${ chi_{{x } }: xin X }$, which gives us
$$ Xcong AcongGamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}=mathrm{Spec}(A). $$
I've not checked continuity yet, which shouldn't be too complicated. I'm stuck at this point because $Acong mathrm{Spec}(A)$ shocks me.
Can you help me, please?
Is my reasoning right?
general-topology algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra zariski-topology
Let $X$ be a compact, totally disconnected space.
It must be shown that $X$ is homeomorphic to $mathrm{Spec}(A)$, where
$$ A:=C(X, mathbb{Z}_2), $$
and $mathbb{Z}_2$ is endowed with the discrete topology.
At first, it is easy to see that $A={ chi_S: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X }$ (no matter how ugly or cool $X$ is)[further, such $A$ is a boolean ring]
And, naturally, there is a correspondence $${ chi_S: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X } rightleftarrows { Ssubseteq X: S; mathrm{is,open,and,closed,in;}X }=:Gamma_X $$
I think I've read somewhere (sorry, I forgot where), that if $B$ is a boolean ring, then $B$ is isomorphic to $Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(B)}$. Let us denote this result by $(*)$.
I think that, under the assumption of $(*)$, $Acong Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}$, but if $X$ is totally disconnected, then $Gamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}=mathrm{Spec}(A)$, is this right ?
Also, $X$ is in a one-to-one correspondence with ${ chi_{{x } }: xin X }$, which gives us
$$ Xcong AcongGamma_{mathrm{Spec}(A)}=mathrm{Spec}(A). $$
I've not checked continuity yet, which shouldn't be too complicated. I'm stuck at this point because $Acong mathrm{Spec}(A)$ shocks me.
Can you help me, please?
Is my reasoning right?
general-topology algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra zariski-topology
general-topology algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra zariski-topology
asked Nov 21 '16 at 22:42
EternalBlood
481218
481218
$(*)$ is called Stone's representation theorem.
– Armando j18eos
Nov 23 '16 at 15:01
add a comment |
$(*)$ is called Stone's representation theorem.
– Armando j18eos
Nov 23 '16 at 15:01
$(*)$ is called Stone's representation theorem.
– Armando j18eos
Nov 23 '16 at 15:01
$(*)$ is called Stone's representation theorem.
– Armando j18eos
Nov 23 '16 at 15:01
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I consider directly $Y=operatorname{Spec}(A)$: because $A$ is a Boolean $mathbb{Z}_2$-algebra, the unique clopen subsets of $Y$ are
begin{equation*}
Y_f={mathfrak{p}in Ymid fnotinmathfrak{p}},,fin A
end{equation*}
(cfr. [AM] chapter 1, exercises 23.(i) and 23.(iii)); every prime ideal $mathfrak{p}$ of $A$ is maximal and $A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{p}}congmathbb{Z}_2$ (cfr. [AM] chapter 1, exercise 11.(ii)).
Because $A$ is the ring of regular morphisms on $Y$, that is
begin{gather*}
forall fin A,,f^{*}:Ytocoprod_{mathfrak{q}in Y} A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{q}},\
f^{*}(mathfrak{p})=[f]_{mathfrak{p}}in A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{p}}congmathbb{Z}_2,
end{gather*}
then
begin{equation*}
Y_f={mathfrak{p}in Ymid f^{*}(mathfrak{p})=1inmathbb{Z}_2}.
end{equation*}
Analogously, one can define
begin{equation*}
forall fin A,,X_f={xin Xmid f(x)=1inmathbb{Z}_2};
end{equation*}
easily one can to show that ${X_fsubseteqq X}_{fin A}$ is an open covering of $X$ and
begin{equation*}
forall f,gin A,,X_fcap X_g=X_{fg},
end{equation*}
that is ${X_fsubseteqq X}_{fin A}$ is a topological base of $X$.
It is an exercise to show that
begin{equation*}
forall xin X,,mathfrak{p}_x={fin Amid f(x)=0inmathbb{Z}_2}
end{equation*}
is a prime ideal of $A$; because $X$ is totally disconnected, it is a Fréchet space and
begin{equation*}
forall xneq yin X,,exists fneq gin Amid xin X_f,yin X_g,xnotin X_g,ynotin X_fRightarrowmathfrak{p}_xneqmathfrak{p}_yin Y.
end{equation*}
By previous reasoning, the map
begin{equation*}
varphi:xin Xtomathfrak{p}_xin Y
end{equation*}
is injective and continuous because:
begin{equation*}
forall fin A,,varphi^{-1}(Y_f)=X_f.
end{equation*}
Because $Y$ with Zariski topology is a compact Hausdorff space (cfr. [AM], chapter 1, exercise 23.(iv)) and, in general, $X$ is not Hausdorff: one can not prove that $varphi$ is a homeomorphism.
[AM] M. F. Atiyah, I. G. MacDonald - Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1969)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2024993%2fspectrum-of-a-ring-homeomorphic-to-a-compact-totally-disconnected-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I consider directly $Y=operatorname{Spec}(A)$: because $A$ is a Boolean $mathbb{Z}_2$-algebra, the unique clopen subsets of $Y$ are
begin{equation*}
Y_f={mathfrak{p}in Ymid fnotinmathfrak{p}},,fin A
end{equation*}
(cfr. [AM] chapter 1, exercises 23.(i) and 23.(iii)); every prime ideal $mathfrak{p}$ of $A$ is maximal and $A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{p}}congmathbb{Z}_2$ (cfr. [AM] chapter 1, exercise 11.(ii)).
Because $A$ is the ring of regular morphisms on $Y$, that is
begin{gather*}
forall fin A,,f^{*}:Ytocoprod_{mathfrak{q}in Y} A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{q}},\
f^{*}(mathfrak{p})=[f]_{mathfrak{p}}in A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{p}}congmathbb{Z}_2,
end{gather*}
then
begin{equation*}
Y_f={mathfrak{p}in Ymid f^{*}(mathfrak{p})=1inmathbb{Z}_2}.
end{equation*}
Analogously, one can define
begin{equation*}
forall fin A,,X_f={xin Xmid f(x)=1inmathbb{Z}_2};
end{equation*}
easily one can to show that ${X_fsubseteqq X}_{fin A}$ is an open covering of $X$ and
begin{equation*}
forall f,gin A,,X_fcap X_g=X_{fg},
end{equation*}
that is ${X_fsubseteqq X}_{fin A}$ is a topological base of $X$.
It is an exercise to show that
begin{equation*}
forall xin X,,mathfrak{p}_x={fin Amid f(x)=0inmathbb{Z}_2}
end{equation*}
is a prime ideal of $A$; because $X$ is totally disconnected, it is a Fréchet space and
begin{equation*}
forall xneq yin X,,exists fneq gin Amid xin X_f,yin X_g,xnotin X_g,ynotin X_fRightarrowmathfrak{p}_xneqmathfrak{p}_yin Y.
end{equation*}
By previous reasoning, the map
begin{equation*}
varphi:xin Xtomathfrak{p}_xin Y
end{equation*}
is injective and continuous because:
begin{equation*}
forall fin A,,varphi^{-1}(Y_f)=X_f.
end{equation*}
Because $Y$ with Zariski topology is a compact Hausdorff space (cfr. [AM], chapter 1, exercise 23.(iv)) and, in general, $X$ is not Hausdorff: one can not prove that $varphi$ is a homeomorphism.
[AM] M. F. Atiyah, I. G. MacDonald - Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1969)
add a comment |
I consider directly $Y=operatorname{Spec}(A)$: because $A$ is a Boolean $mathbb{Z}_2$-algebra, the unique clopen subsets of $Y$ are
begin{equation*}
Y_f={mathfrak{p}in Ymid fnotinmathfrak{p}},,fin A
end{equation*}
(cfr. [AM] chapter 1, exercises 23.(i) and 23.(iii)); every prime ideal $mathfrak{p}$ of $A$ is maximal and $A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{p}}congmathbb{Z}_2$ (cfr. [AM] chapter 1, exercise 11.(ii)).
Because $A$ is the ring of regular morphisms on $Y$, that is
begin{gather*}
forall fin A,,f^{*}:Ytocoprod_{mathfrak{q}in Y} A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{q}},\
f^{*}(mathfrak{p})=[f]_{mathfrak{p}}in A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{p}}congmathbb{Z}_2,
end{gather*}
then
begin{equation*}
Y_f={mathfrak{p}in Ymid f^{*}(mathfrak{p})=1inmathbb{Z}_2}.
end{equation*}
Analogously, one can define
begin{equation*}
forall fin A,,X_f={xin Xmid f(x)=1inmathbb{Z}_2};
end{equation*}
easily one can to show that ${X_fsubseteqq X}_{fin A}$ is an open covering of $X$ and
begin{equation*}
forall f,gin A,,X_fcap X_g=X_{fg},
end{equation*}
that is ${X_fsubseteqq X}_{fin A}$ is a topological base of $X$.
It is an exercise to show that
begin{equation*}
forall xin X,,mathfrak{p}_x={fin Amid f(x)=0inmathbb{Z}_2}
end{equation*}
is a prime ideal of $A$; because $X$ is totally disconnected, it is a Fréchet space and
begin{equation*}
forall xneq yin X,,exists fneq gin Amid xin X_f,yin X_g,xnotin X_g,ynotin X_fRightarrowmathfrak{p}_xneqmathfrak{p}_yin Y.
end{equation*}
By previous reasoning, the map
begin{equation*}
varphi:xin Xtomathfrak{p}_xin Y
end{equation*}
is injective and continuous because:
begin{equation*}
forall fin A,,varphi^{-1}(Y_f)=X_f.
end{equation*}
Because $Y$ with Zariski topology is a compact Hausdorff space (cfr. [AM], chapter 1, exercise 23.(iv)) and, in general, $X$ is not Hausdorff: one can not prove that $varphi$ is a homeomorphism.
[AM] M. F. Atiyah, I. G. MacDonald - Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1969)
add a comment |
I consider directly $Y=operatorname{Spec}(A)$: because $A$ is a Boolean $mathbb{Z}_2$-algebra, the unique clopen subsets of $Y$ are
begin{equation*}
Y_f={mathfrak{p}in Ymid fnotinmathfrak{p}},,fin A
end{equation*}
(cfr. [AM] chapter 1, exercises 23.(i) and 23.(iii)); every prime ideal $mathfrak{p}$ of $A$ is maximal and $A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{p}}congmathbb{Z}_2$ (cfr. [AM] chapter 1, exercise 11.(ii)).
Because $A$ is the ring of regular morphisms on $Y$, that is
begin{gather*}
forall fin A,,f^{*}:Ytocoprod_{mathfrak{q}in Y} A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{q}},\
f^{*}(mathfrak{p})=[f]_{mathfrak{p}}in A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{p}}congmathbb{Z}_2,
end{gather*}
then
begin{equation*}
Y_f={mathfrak{p}in Ymid f^{*}(mathfrak{p})=1inmathbb{Z}_2}.
end{equation*}
Analogously, one can define
begin{equation*}
forall fin A,,X_f={xin Xmid f(x)=1inmathbb{Z}_2};
end{equation*}
easily one can to show that ${X_fsubseteqq X}_{fin A}$ is an open covering of $X$ and
begin{equation*}
forall f,gin A,,X_fcap X_g=X_{fg},
end{equation*}
that is ${X_fsubseteqq X}_{fin A}$ is a topological base of $X$.
It is an exercise to show that
begin{equation*}
forall xin X,,mathfrak{p}_x={fin Amid f(x)=0inmathbb{Z}_2}
end{equation*}
is a prime ideal of $A$; because $X$ is totally disconnected, it is a Fréchet space and
begin{equation*}
forall xneq yin X,,exists fneq gin Amid xin X_f,yin X_g,xnotin X_g,ynotin X_fRightarrowmathfrak{p}_xneqmathfrak{p}_yin Y.
end{equation*}
By previous reasoning, the map
begin{equation*}
varphi:xin Xtomathfrak{p}_xin Y
end{equation*}
is injective and continuous because:
begin{equation*}
forall fin A,,varphi^{-1}(Y_f)=X_f.
end{equation*}
Because $Y$ with Zariski topology is a compact Hausdorff space (cfr. [AM], chapter 1, exercise 23.(iv)) and, in general, $X$ is not Hausdorff: one can not prove that $varphi$ is a homeomorphism.
[AM] M. F. Atiyah, I. G. MacDonald - Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1969)
I consider directly $Y=operatorname{Spec}(A)$: because $A$ is a Boolean $mathbb{Z}_2$-algebra, the unique clopen subsets of $Y$ are
begin{equation*}
Y_f={mathfrak{p}in Ymid fnotinmathfrak{p}},,fin A
end{equation*}
(cfr. [AM] chapter 1, exercises 23.(i) and 23.(iii)); every prime ideal $mathfrak{p}$ of $A$ is maximal and $A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{p}}congmathbb{Z}_2$ (cfr. [AM] chapter 1, exercise 11.(ii)).
Because $A$ is the ring of regular morphisms on $Y$, that is
begin{gather*}
forall fin A,,f^{*}:Ytocoprod_{mathfrak{q}in Y} A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{q}},\
f^{*}(mathfrak{p})=[f]_{mathfrak{p}}in A_{displaystyle/mathfrak{p}}congmathbb{Z}_2,
end{gather*}
then
begin{equation*}
Y_f={mathfrak{p}in Ymid f^{*}(mathfrak{p})=1inmathbb{Z}_2}.
end{equation*}
Analogously, one can define
begin{equation*}
forall fin A,,X_f={xin Xmid f(x)=1inmathbb{Z}_2};
end{equation*}
easily one can to show that ${X_fsubseteqq X}_{fin A}$ is an open covering of $X$ and
begin{equation*}
forall f,gin A,,X_fcap X_g=X_{fg},
end{equation*}
that is ${X_fsubseteqq X}_{fin A}$ is a topological base of $X$.
It is an exercise to show that
begin{equation*}
forall xin X,,mathfrak{p}_x={fin Amid f(x)=0inmathbb{Z}_2}
end{equation*}
is a prime ideal of $A$; because $X$ is totally disconnected, it is a Fréchet space and
begin{equation*}
forall xneq yin X,,exists fneq gin Amid xin X_f,yin X_g,xnotin X_g,ynotin X_fRightarrowmathfrak{p}_xneqmathfrak{p}_yin Y.
end{equation*}
By previous reasoning, the map
begin{equation*}
varphi:xin Xtomathfrak{p}_xin Y
end{equation*}
is injective and continuous because:
begin{equation*}
forall fin A,,varphi^{-1}(Y_f)=X_f.
end{equation*}
Because $Y$ with Zariski topology is a compact Hausdorff space (cfr. [AM], chapter 1, exercise 23.(iv)) and, in general, $X$ is not Hausdorff: one can not prove that $varphi$ is a homeomorphism.
[AM] M. F. Atiyah, I. G. MacDonald - Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1969)
edited Nov 27 at 13:16
answered Nov 23 '16 at 19:17
Armando j18eos
2,61511328
2,61511328
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2024993%2fspectrum-of-a-ring-homeomorphic-to-a-compact-totally-disconnected-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$(*)$ is called Stone's representation theorem.
– Armando j18eos
Nov 23 '16 at 15:01