Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups help












2












$begingroup$


Let $(G, ∗)$ be a group, let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$, and let $(G/H, ⋆)$ denote the quotient group of $G$ by $H$.



(a) Prove that if $xH in G/H$, then $(xH)^m = x^mH$ for all $m ∈ Z$.



(b) Suppose that there is no positive integer $m$ for which $x^m ∈ H$. Prove that $ord(xH) = ∞$.



(c) Suppose that there exists a positive integer $m$ for which $x^m ∈ H$. Prove that $ord(xH) = d$, where $d$ is the least positive integer for which $x^d ∈ H$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Maths SX! What did you try and where are you stuck?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 6 at 16:51










  • $begingroup$
    I edited your post to make $LaTeX$ work, and to bring it into accord with typical mathematical conventions. Hope I got it right! Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jan 6 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! That is looking good. I have proven part (a) by doing xH ⋆ xH ⋆ ... ⋆ xH (m times) which gives us ( x * x * ... * x) (also m times).
    $endgroup$
    – Marwan Helali
    Jan 6 at 19:36










  • $begingroup$
    But I do not know how to prove part (b) and (c) yet. Anyone could give me a hand?
    $endgroup$
    – Marwan Helali
    Jan 6 at 19:36
















2












$begingroup$


Let $(G, ∗)$ be a group, let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$, and let $(G/H, ⋆)$ denote the quotient group of $G$ by $H$.



(a) Prove that if $xH in G/H$, then $(xH)^m = x^mH$ for all $m ∈ Z$.



(b) Suppose that there is no positive integer $m$ for which $x^m ∈ H$. Prove that $ord(xH) = ∞$.



(c) Suppose that there exists a positive integer $m$ for which $x^m ∈ H$. Prove that $ord(xH) = d$, where $d$ is the least positive integer for which $x^d ∈ H$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Maths SX! What did you try and where are you stuck?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 6 at 16:51










  • $begingroup$
    I edited your post to make $LaTeX$ work, and to bring it into accord with typical mathematical conventions. Hope I got it right! Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jan 6 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! That is looking good. I have proven part (a) by doing xH ⋆ xH ⋆ ... ⋆ xH (m times) which gives us ( x * x * ... * x) (also m times).
    $endgroup$
    – Marwan Helali
    Jan 6 at 19:36










  • $begingroup$
    But I do not know how to prove part (b) and (c) yet. Anyone could give me a hand?
    $endgroup$
    – Marwan Helali
    Jan 6 at 19:36














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $(G, ∗)$ be a group, let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$, and let $(G/H, ⋆)$ denote the quotient group of $G$ by $H$.



(a) Prove that if $xH in G/H$, then $(xH)^m = x^mH$ for all $m ∈ Z$.



(b) Suppose that there is no positive integer $m$ for which $x^m ∈ H$. Prove that $ord(xH) = ∞$.



(c) Suppose that there exists a positive integer $m$ for which $x^m ∈ H$. Prove that $ord(xH) = d$, where $d$ is the least positive integer for which $x^d ∈ H$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $(G, ∗)$ be a group, let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$, and let $(G/H, ⋆)$ denote the quotient group of $G$ by $H$.



(a) Prove that if $xH in G/H$, then $(xH)^m = x^mH$ for all $m ∈ Z$.



(b) Suppose that there is no positive integer $m$ for which $x^m ∈ H$. Prove that $ord(xH) = ∞$.



(c) Suppose that there exists a positive integer $m$ for which $x^m ∈ H$. Prove that $ord(xH) = d$, where $d$ is the least positive integer for which $x^d ∈ H$.







normal-subgroups quotient-group






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 6 at 17:35









Robert Lewis

48.9k23168




48.9k23168










asked Jan 6 at 16:34









Marwan HelaliMarwan Helali

161




161












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Maths SX! What did you try and where are you stuck?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 6 at 16:51










  • $begingroup$
    I edited your post to make $LaTeX$ work, and to bring it into accord with typical mathematical conventions. Hope I got it right! Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jan 6 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! That is looking good. I have proven part (a) by doing xH ⋆ xH ⋆ ... ⋆ xH (m times) which gives us ( x * x * ... * x) (also m times).
    $endgroup$
    – Marwan Helali
    Jan 6 at 19:36










  • $begingroup$
    But I do not know how to prove part (b) and (c) yet. Anyone could give me a hand?
    $endgroup$
    – Marwan Helali
    Jan 6 at 19:36


















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Maths SX! What did you try and where are you stuck?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 6 at 16:51










  • $begingroup$
    I edited your post to make $LaTeX$ work, and to bring it into accord with typical mathematical conventions. Hope I got it right! Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jan 6 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! That is looking good. I have proven part (a) by doing xH ⋆ xH ⋆ ... ⋆ xH (m times) which gives us ( x * x * ... * x) (also m times).
    $endgroup$
    – Marwan Helali
    Jan 6 at 19:36










  • $begingroup$
    But I do not know how to prove part (b) and (c) yet. Anyone could give me a hand?
    $endgroup$
    – Marwan Helali
    Jan 6 at 19:36
















$begingroup$
Welcome to Maths SX! What did you try and where are you stuck?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 6 at 16:51




$begingroup$
Welcome to Maths SX! What did you try and where are you stuck?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 6 at 16:51












$begingroup$
I edited your post to make $LaTeX$ work, and to bring it into accord with typical mathematical conventions. Hope I got it right! Cheers!
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 6 at 17:37




$begingroup$
I edited your post to make $LaTeX$ work, and to bring it into accord with typical mathematical conventions. Hope I got it right! Cheers!
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 6 at 17:37












$begingroup$
Thank you! That is looking good. I have proven part (a) by doing xH ⋆ xH ⋆ ... ⋆ xH (m times) which gives us ( x * x * ... * x) (also m times).
$endgroup$
– Marwan Helali
Jan 6 at 19:36




$begingroup$
Thank you! That is looking good. I have proven part (a) by doing xH ⋆ xH ⋆ ... ⋆ xH (m times) which gives us ( x * x * ... * x) (also m times).
$endgroup$
– Marwan Helali
Jan 6 at 19:36












$begingroup$
But I do not know how to prove part (b) and (c) yet. Anyone could give me a hand?
$endgroup$
– Marwan Helali
Jan 6 at 19:36




$begingroup$
But I do not know how to prove part (b) and (c) yet. Anyone could give me a hand?
$endgroup$
– Marwan Helali
Jan 6 at 19:36










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064080%2fnormal-subgroups-and-quotient-groups-help%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064080%2fnormal-subgroups-and-quotient-groups-help%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix

“minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis