Approximating $sumlimits_{rsubset S}|r|!prodlimits_{xin r}x$












3












$begingroup$


There is a set $S={x_1, x_2, ..., x_N}.$



I'm trying to approximate this:
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$



I know that:



$$sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x=prod_{xin S}(1+x)$$



I was wondering if there is a way to approximate $p(S)$ with something.





An idea:
Change $x$ in $prodlimits_{xin S}(1+x)$ to $a(x)x$ so that:



$$prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)simsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$





Stirling's approximation



There is: $$n! sim (2pi n)^frac{1}{2}(frac{n}{e})^n$$
which for my problem $n^n$ is troubling and I can't fiure out a way for $prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)$ to make $n^n$. It could also go up to a power of e:
$$n! sim e^{log(2pi)/2-n+nlog(n)}$$
But again, can't figure out to handle $nlog(n)$.













share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Jan 12 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
    $endgroup$
    – Anais
    Jan 12 at 22:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 13 at 12:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 13 at 14:53








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 22 at 12:12
















3












$begingroup$


There is a set $S={x_1, x_2, ..., x_N}.$



I'm trying to approximate this:
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$



I know that:



$$sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x=prod_{xin S}(1+x)$$



I was wondering if there is a way to approximate $p(S)$ with something.





An idea:
Change $x$ in $prodlimits_{xin S}(1+x)$ to $a(x)x$ so that:



$$prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)simsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$





Stirling's approximation



There is: $$n! sim (2pi n)^frac{1}{2}(frac{n}{e})^n$$
which for my problem $n^n$ is troubling and I can't fiure out a way for $prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)$ to make $n^n$. It could also go up to a power of e:
$$n! sim e^{log(2pi)/2-n+nlog(n)}$$
But again, can't figure out to handle $nlog(n)$.













share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Jan 12 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
    $endgroup$
    – Anais
    Jan 12 at 22:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 13 at 12:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 13 at 14:53








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 22 at 12:12














3












3








3


3



$begingroup$


There is a set $S={x_1, x_2, ..., x_N}.$



I'm trying to approximate this:
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$



I know that:



$$sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x=prod_{xin S}(1+x)$$



I was wondering if there is a way to approximate $p(S)$ with something.





An idea:
Change $x$ in $prodlimits_{xin S}(1+x)$ to $a(x)x$ so that:



$$prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)simsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$





Stirling's approximation



There is: $$n! sim (2pi n)^frac{1}{2}(frac{n}{e})^n$$
which for my problem $n^n$ is troubling and I can't fiure out a way for $prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)$ to make $n^n$. It could also go up to a power of e:
$$n! sim e^{log(2pi)/2-n+nlog(n)}$$
But again, can't figure out to handle $nlog(n)$.













share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




There is a set $S={x_1, x_2, ..., x_N}.$



I'm trying to approximate this:
$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$



I know that:



$$sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x=prod_{xin S}(1+x)$$



I was wondering if there is a way to approximate $p(S)$ with something.





An idea:
Change $x$ in $prodlimits_{xin S}(1+x)$ to $a(x)x$ so that:



$$prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)simsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x$$





Stirling's approximation



There is: $$n! sim (2pi n)^frac{1}{2}(frac{n}{e})^n$$
which for my problem $n^n$ is troubling and I can't fiure out a way for $prod_{xin S}(1+a(x)x)$ to make $n^n$. It could also go up to a power of e:
$$n! sim e^{log(2pi)/2-n+nlog(n)}$$
But again, can't figure out to handle $nlog(n)$.










combinatorics discrete-mathematics combinations approximation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 22 at 11:36







Anais

















asked Jan 5 at 8:55









AnaisAnais

437




437








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Jan 12 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
    $endgroup$
    – Anais
    Jan 12 at 22:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 13 at 12:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 13 at 14:53








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 22 at 12:12














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Jan 12 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
    $endgroup$
    – Anais
    Jan 12 at 22:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 13 at 12:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 13 at 14:53








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 22 at 12:12








1




1




$begingroup$
Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Jan 12 at 17:45




$begingroup$
Are all the $x_i$s (positive) integers?
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Jan 12 at 17:45












$begingroup$
@Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
$endgroup$
– Anais
Jan 12 at 22:12




$begingroup$
@Cardioid_Ass_22 yes
$endgroup$
– Anais
Jan 12 at 22:12




1




1




$begingroup$
In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 12:37




$begingroup$
In your last comment, when you have for the term where $r=emptyset$, you have $(-1)!$, could you explain what that is ? Also from since it is combinatorics, I would say that it is just that you should add a condition that $|r|geq 1$ right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 12:37




1




1




$begingroup$
@Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 14:53






$begingroup$
@Anais I'm pretty sure I screwed something, if I can fix it I will undelete it. You didn't get the right result right ?
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 13 at 14:53






2




2




$begingroup$
This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 22 at 12:12




$begingroup$
This may be of use : suppose you change the notations and use lists instead of sets in order to allow for repetition of elements. Then for some $yin S$, we can see that $p(S)=p(S-y)+y (p(S-y+1)-p(S-y))$ where $S-y$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and $S-y+1$ is the list $S$ without one of the occurrence of $y$ and with an added occurrence of $1$. This gives you a recurrence relation with a decreasing size of $S$ or elements of $S$ being replaced by $1$.
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 22 at 12:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

We can find an easy upper bound for $p(S)$ in the function $prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)$, as $$prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)=sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)prod_{xin r}xgeqsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=p(S)$$



(the inequality holding as all $x$'s are positive integers)

For a lower bound, you could use the product $prod_{xin S}(1+x)$, as you have mentioned.



Correcting what I wrote in a comment, you could also use $prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$ where $R(S)$ is a remainder term.



$$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\sum_{rsubset S,|r|=0}0!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=1}1!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=2}2!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=3}3!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}2^{|r|}prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nin 2^{|r|}}prod_{xin n}x=\1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nsubset r}prod_{xin n}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}prod_{xin r}(1+x)=\bigg(1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyzbigg)+sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-bigg(1+sum_{xin S}(1+x)+sum_{x,yin S\ xneq y}(1+x)(1+y)+sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}(1+x)(1+y)(1+z)bigg)=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-|S|-binom{|S|}{2}-binom{|S|}{3}-frac{|S|(|S|-1)}{2}sum_{xin S}x-(|S|-3)sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+\5sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-R(S)=sum_{tsubset S+1}prod_{yin t}y-R(S)=prod_{yin S+1}(1+y)-R(S)=\prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$$



(I have used expressions like $S+1$ above to denote the set consisting of elements of $S$ each incremented by $1$)



The upper bound represents setting $a(x)=x$ and the lower bound, setting $a(x)=1+frac{1}{x}$, both, of course, diverge from $p(S)$ vastly for large sizes of $S$.



I can see no way of finding a function $a(x)$ that would satisfy the constraints in your question unless some additional restrictions on $S$ were added.



(please edit or comment for any corrections)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062530%2fapproximating-sum-limits-r-subset-sr-prod-limits-x-in-rx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    We can find an easy upper bound for $p(S)$ in the function $prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)$, as $$prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)=sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)prod_{xin r}xgeqsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=p(S)$$



    (the inequality holding as all $x$'s are positive integers)

    For a lower bound, you could use the product $prod_{xin S}(1+x)$, as you have mentioned.



    Correcting what I wrote in a comment, you could also use $prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$ where $R(S)$ is a remainder term.



    $$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\sum_{rsubset S,|r|=0}0!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=1}1!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=2}2!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=3}3!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}2^{|r|}prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nin 2^{|r|}}prod_{xin n}x=\1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nsubset r}prod_{xin n}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}prod_{xin r}(1+x)=\bigg(1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyzbigg)+sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-bigg(1+sum_{xin S}(1+x)+sum_{x,yin S\ xneq y}(1+x)(1+y)+sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}(1+x)(1+y)(1+z)bigg)=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-|S|-binom{|S|}{2}-binom{|S|}{3}-frac{|S|(|S|-1)}{2}sum_{xin S}x-(|S|-3)sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+\5sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-R(S)=sum_{tsubset S+1}prod_{yin t}y-R(S)=prod_{yin S+1}(1+y)-R(S)=\prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$$



    (I have used expressions like $S+1$ above to denote the set consisting of elements of $S$ each incremented by $1$)



    The upper bound represents setting $a(x)=x$ and the lower bound, setting $a(x)=1+frac{1}{x}$, both, of course, diverge from $p(S)$ vastly for large sizes of $S$.



    I can see no way of finding a function $a(x)$ that would satisfy the constraints in your question unless some additional restrictions on $S$ were added.



    (please edit or comment for any corrections)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      We can find an easy upper bound for $p(S)$ in the function $prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)$, as $$prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)=sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)prod_{xin r}xgeqsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=p(S)$$



      (the inequality holding as all $x$'s are positive integers)

      For a lower bound, you could use the product $prod_{xin S}(1+x)$, as you have mentioned.



      Correcting what I wrote in a comment, you could also use $prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$ where $R(S)$ is a remainder term.



      $$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\sum_{rsubset S,|r|=0}0!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=1}1!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=2}2!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=3}3!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}2^{|r|}prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nin 2^{|r|}}prod_{xin n}x=\1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nsubset r}prod_{xin n}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}prod_{xin r}(1+x)=\bigg(1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyzbigg)+sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-bigg(1+sum_{xin S}(1+x)+sum_{x,yin S\ xneq y}(1+x)(1+y)+sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}(1+x)(1+y)(1+z)bigg)=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-|S|-binom{|S|}{2}-binom{|S|}{3}-frac{|S|(|S|-1)}{2}sum_{xin S}x-(|S|-3)sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+\5sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-R(S)=sum_{tsubset S+1}prod_{yin t}y-R(S)=prod_{yin S+1}(1+y)-R(S)=\prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$$



      (I have used expressions like $S+1$ above to denote the set consisting of elements of $S$ each incremented by $1$)



      The upper bound represents setting $a(x)=x$ and the lower bound, setting $a(x)=1+frac{1}{x}$, both, of course, diverge from $p(S)$ vastly for large sizes of $S$.



      I can see no way of finding a function $a(x)$ that would satisfy the constraints in your question unless some additional restrictions on $S$ were added.



      (please edit or comment for any corrections)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        We can find an easy upper bound for $p(S)$ in the function $prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)$, as $$prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)=sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)prod_{xin r}xgeqsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=p(S)$$



        (the inequality holding as all $x$'s are positive integers)

        For a lower bound, you could use the product $prod_{xin S}(1+x)$, as you have mentioned.



        Correcting what I wrote in a comment, you could also use $prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$ where $R(S)$ is a remainder term.



        $$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\sum_{rsubset S,|r|=0}0!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=1}1!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=2}2!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=3}3!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}2^{|r|}prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nin 2^{|r|}}prod_{xin n}x=\1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nsubset r}prod_{xin n}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}prod_{xin r}(1+x)=\bigg(1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyzbigg)+sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-bigg(1+sum_{xin S}(1+x)+sum_{x,yin S\ xneq y}(1+x)(1+y)+sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}(1+x)(1+y)(1+z)bigg)=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-|S|-binom{|S|}{2}-binom{|S|}{3}-frac{|S|(|S|-1)}{2}sum_{xin S}x-(|S|-3)sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+\5sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-R(S)=sum_{tsubset S+1}prod_{yin t}y-R(S)=prod_{yin S+1}(1+y)-R(S)=\prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$$



        (I have used expressions like $S+1$ above to denote the set consisting of elements of $S$ each incremented by $1$)



        The upper bound represents setting $a(x)=x$ and the lower bound, setting $a(x)=1+frac{1}{x}$, both, of course, diverge from $p(S)$ vastly for large sizes of $S$.



        I can see no way of finding a function $a(x)$ that would satisfy the constraints in your question unless some additional restrictions on $S$ were added.



        (please edit or comment for any corrections)






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        We can find an easy upper bound for $p(S)$ in the function $prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)$, as $$prod_{xin S}(1+x^2)=sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}x^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)^2=sum_{rsubset S}bigg(prod_{xin r}xbigg)prod_{xin r}xgeqsum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=p(S)$$



        (the inequality holding as all $x$'s are positive integers)

        For a lower bound, you could use the product $prod_{xin S}(1+x)$, as you have mentioned.



        Correcting what I wrote in a comment, you could also use $prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$ where $R(S)$ is a remainder term.



        $$p(S)=sum_{rsubset S}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\sum_{rsubset S,|r|=0}0!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=1}1!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=2}2!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|=3}3!prod_{xin r}x+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}|r|!prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S,|r|>3}2^{|r|}prod_{xin r}xgeq\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nin 2^{|r|}}prod_{xin n}x=\1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}sum_{nsubset r}prod_{xin n}x=\ 1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz+sum_{rsubset S\|r|>3}prod_{xin r}(1+x)=\bigg(1+sum_{xin S}x+2sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+6sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyzbigg)+sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-bigg(1+sum_{xin S}(1+x)+sum_{x,yin S\ xneq y}(1+x)(1+y)+sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}(1+x)(1+y)(1+z)bigg)=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-|S|-binom{|S|}{2}-binom{|S|}{3}-frac{|S|(|S|-1)}{2}sum_{xin S}x-(|S|-3)sum_{x,yin S\xneq y}xy+\5sum_{x,y,zin S\xneq yneq z}xyz=\sum_{rsubset S}prod_{xin r}(1+x)-R(S)=sum_{tsubset S+1}prod_{yin t}y-R(S)=prod_{yin S+1}(1+y)-R(S)=\prod_{xin S}(2+x)-R(S)$$



        (I have used expressions like $S+1$ above to denote the set consisting of elements of $S$ each incremented by $1$)



        The upper bound represents setting $a(x)=x$ and the lower bound, setting $a(x)=1+frac{1}{x}$, both, of course, diverge from $p(S)$ vastly for large sizes of $S$.



        I can see no way of finding a function $a(x)$ that would satisfy the constraints in your question unless some additional restrictions on $S$ were added.



        (please edit or comment for any corrections)







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Feb 6 at 11:11









        Cardioid_Ass_22Cardioid_Ass_22

        47815




        47815






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062530%2fapproximating-sum-limits-r-subset-sr-prod-limits-x-in-rx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix

            “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis