Linear programming Set cover problem with no overlap












0












$begingroup$


The classical set cover problem admits overlapping (the following is the relaxed form):



$min sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$

s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) geq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$



Is there a way to have no overlap of element?



I know that problem of set packing can do the job, the problem is that I want to minimize the total cost (weight) and the maximum set packing problem is the following:



$max sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$

s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) leq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$



It maximize the total cost in this way and it seems not what I need.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



migrated from datascience.stackexchange.com Jan 6 at 16:21


This question came from our site for Data science professionals, Machine Learning specialists, and those interested in learning more about the field.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
    $endgroup$
    – anymous.asker
    Jan 6 at 14:29
















0












$begingroup$


The classical set cover problem admits overlapping (the following is the relaxed form):



$min sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$

s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) geq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$



Is there a way to have no overlap of element?



I know that problem of set packing can do the job, the problem is that I want to minimize the total cost (weight) and the maximum set packing problem is the following:



$max sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$

s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) leq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$



It maximize the total cost in this way and it seems not what I need.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



migrated from datascience.stackexchange.com Jan 6 at 16:21


This question came from our site for Data science professionals, Machine Learning specialists, and those interested in learning more about the field.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
    $endgroup$
    – anymous.asker
    Jan 6 at 14:29














0












0








0





$begingroup$


The classical set cover problem admits overlapping (the following is the relaxed form):



$min sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$

s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) geq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$



Is there a way to have no overlap of element?



I know that problem of set packing can do the job, the problem is that I want to minimize the total cost (weight) and the maximum set packing problem is the following:



$max sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$

s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) leq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$



It maximize the total cost in this way and it seems not what I need.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The classical set cover problem admits overlapping (the following is the relaxed form):



$min sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$

s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) geq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$



Is there a way to have no overlap of element?



I know that problem of set packing can do the job, the problem is that I want to minimize the total cost (weight) and the maximum set packing problem is the following:



$max sum_{S in mathcal{S}} c(S)x(S)$

s.t
$sum_{S: e in S} x(S) leq 1 forall e in U$
$x(S) in [0,1] S in mathcal{S}$



It maximize the total cost in this way and it seems not what I need.







algorithms






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 9 at 18:18







CuriousMind

















asked Jan 6 at 10:51









CuriousMindCuriousMind

32




32




migrated from datascience.stackexchange.com Jan 6 at 16:21


This question came from our site for Data science professionals, Machine Learning specialists, and those interested in learning more about the field.









migrated from datascience.stackexchange.com Jan 6 at 16:21


This question came from our site for Data science professionals, Machine Learning specialists, and those interested in learning more about the field.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
    $endgroup$
    – anymous.asker
    Jan 6 at 14:29














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
    $endgroup$
    – anymous.asker
    Jan 6 at 14:29








1




1




$begingroup$
It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
$endgroup$
– anymous.asker
Jan 6 at 14:29




$begingroup$
It's of course possible to have no overlap if you set your constraint to = 1 and make whatever solver you are using respect it. You can read about the problem in wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover . I think for these questions you'd be better of asking in other SE sites such as compsci or math.
$endgroup$
– anymous.asker
Jan 6 at 14:29










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064064%2flinear-programming-set-cover-problem-with-no-overlap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064064%2flinear-programming-set-cover-problem-with-no-overlap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix

“minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis