Why aren't images rotated in Windows Photo Viewer?












0















A particular image appears rotated (in the "portrait" orientation) when viewed in Thunderbird (as an e-mail attachment), Firefox, and Photoshop. However, it appears in the "landscape" orientation in Windows 7 Explorer and Windows Photo Viewer Why the inconsistency? Is there any way to fix that by changing settings in the viewer?



In this particular case, the "landscape" orientation is photographically correct, though the camera may have been in a funny position causing an accelerometer to think that a "portrait" orientation was intended.



As viewed in TB/FF/PS, I need to rotate the image counterclockwise 90 degrees to get it looking right. When I use Windows to do that, the orientation then changes to be "portrait" 90 degrees in the opposite rotational direction.



The workaround is to rotate it counterclockwise 90 degrees and then clockwise 90 degrees and then the image displays correctly and consistently in all viewers cited above. It is unintuitive that two opposite lossy rotations (which as opposite operations, should combine for no effect other than compression losses) should be required just to get an image displaying consistently in Windows and other viewers. What am I missing here?










share|improve this question

























  • This is all based on how each program pays attention to and respects the EXIF orientation information stored in the image. Some care about it, some don’t. Which does and why and how to adjust each one is idiosyncratic to each piece of software.

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 15:45






  • 1





    OK, so how would one adjust Windows Photo Viewer to pay attention to EXIF orientation information?

    – WBT
    Sep 19 '15 at 15:53











  • Read your own question. “…the "landscape" orientation is photographically correct, though the camera may have been in a funny position causing an accelerometer to think that a "portrait" orientation was intended.” Windows Photo Viewer seems to be paying attention to the EXIF info since it is “correct” in displaying it “incorrectly.” Everything else is incorrect? Or maybe I have that backwards?

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:13











  • @JakeGould My understanding is that cameras record the image in "landscape" format and sometimes add EXIF metadata saying "display this rotated" that some programs do or don't pay attention to. I suspect the image in question has that EXIF instruction (even though landscape is the best way to look at this image) and Windows Photo Viewer is ignoring it, leading to confusion in what rotations are required for correct display elsewhere.

    – WBT
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:17











  • FWIW, it seems like Windows Photo Viewer doesn’t pay attention to EXIF data and possible solutions are explained here.

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:19
















0















A particular image appears rotated (in the "portrait" orientation) when viewed in Thunderbird (as an e-mail attachment), Firefox, and Photoshop. However, it appears in the "landscape" orientation in Windows 7 Explorer and Windows Photo Viewer Why the inconsistency? Is there any way to fix that by changing settings in the viewer?



In this particular case, the "landscape" orientation is photographically correct, though the camera may have been in a funny position causing an accelerometer to think that a "portrait" orientation was intended.



As viewed in TB/FF/PS, I need to rotate the image counterclockwise 90 degrees to get it looking right. When I use Windows to do that, the orientation then changes to be "portrait" 90 degrees in the opposite rotational direction.



The workaround is to rotate it counterclockwise 90 degrees and then clockwise 90 degrees and then the image displays correctly and consistently in all viewers cited above. It is unintuitive that two opposite lossy rotations (which as opposite operations, should combine for no effect other than compression losses) should be required just to get an image displaying consistently in Windows and other viewers. What am I missing here?










share|improve this question

























  • This is all based on how each program pays attention to and respects the EXIF orientation information stored in the image. Some care about it, some don’t. Which does and why and how to adjust each one is idiosyncratic to each piece of software.

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 15:45






  • 1





    OK, so how would one adjust Windows Photo Viewer to pay attention to EXIF orientation information?

    – WBT
    Sep 19 '15 at 15:53











  • Read your own question. “…the "landscape" orientation is photographically correct, though the camera may have been in a funny position causing an accelerometer to think that a "portrait" orientation was intended.” Windows Photo Viewer seems to be paying attention to the EXIF info since it is “correct” in displaying it “incorrectly.” Everything else is incorrect? Or maybe I have that backwards?

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:13











  • @JakeGould My understanding is that cameras record the image in "landscape" format and sometimes add EXIF metadata saying "display this rotated" that some programs do or don't pay attention to. I suspect the image in question has that EXIF instruction (even though landscape is the best way to look at this image) and Windows Photo Viewer is ignoring it, leading to confusion in what rotations are required for correct display elsewhere.

    – WBT
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:17











  • FWIW, it seems like Windows Photo Viewer doesn’t pay attention to EXIF data and possible solutions are explained here.

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:19














0












0








0


1






A particular image appears rotated (in the "portrait" orientation) when viewed in Thunderbird (as an e-mail attachment), Firefox, and Photoshop. However, it appears in the "landscape" orientation in Windows 7 Explorer and Windows Photo Viewer Why the inconsistency? Is there any way to fix that by changing settings in the viewer?



In this particular case, the "landscape" orientation is photographically correct, though the camera may have been in a funny position causing an accelerometer to think that a "portrait" orientation was intended.



As viewed in TB/FF/PS, I need to rotate the image counterclockwise 90 degrees to get it looking right. When I use Windows to do that, the orientation then changes to be "portrait" 90 degrees in the opposite rotational direction.



The workaround is to rotate it counterclockwise 90 degrees and then clockwise 90 degrees and then the image displays correctly and consistently in all viewers cited above. It is unintuitive that two opposite lossy rotations (which as opposite operations, should combine for no effect other than compression losses) should be required just to get an image displaying consistently in Windows and other viewers. What am I missing here?










share|improve this question
















A particular image appears rotated (in the "portrait" orientation) when viewed in Thunderbird (as an e-mail attachment), Firefox, and Photoshop. However, it appears in the "landscape" orientation in Windows 7 Explorer and Windows Photo Viewer Why the inconsistency? Is there any way to fix that by changing settings in the viewer?



In this particular case, the "landscape" orientation is photographically correct, though the camera may have been in a funny position causing an accelerometer to think that a "portrait" orientation was intended.



As viewed in TB/FF/PS, I need to rotate the image counterclockwise 90 degrees to get it looking right. When I use Windows to do that, the orientation then changes to be "portrait" 90 degrees in the opposite rotational direction.



The workaround is to rotate it counterclockwise 90 degrees and then clockwise 90 degrees and then the image displays correctly and consistently in all viewers cited above. It is unintuitive that two opposite lossy rotations (which as opposite operations, should combine for no effect other than compression losses) should be required just to get an image displaying consistently in Windows and other viewers. What am I missing here?







windows-7 images






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 20 '17 at 10:17









Community

1




1










asked Sep 19 '15 at 15:42









WBTWBT

70421333




70421333













  • This is all based on how each program pays attention to and respects the EXIF orientation information stored in the image. Some care about it, some don’t. Which does and why and how to adjust each one is idiosyncratic to each piece of software.

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 15:45






  • 1





    OK, so how would one adjust Windows Photo Viewer to pay attention to EXIF orientation information?

    – WBT
    Sep 19 '15 at 15:53











  • Read your own question. “…the "landscape" orientation is photographically correct, though the camera may have been in a funny position causing an accelerometer to think that a "portrait" orientation was intended.” Windows Photo Viewer seems to be paying attention to the EXIF info since it is “correct” in displaying it “incorrectly.” Everything else is incorrect? Or maybe I have that backwards?

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:13











  • @JakeGould My understanding is that cameras record the image in "landscape" format and sometimes add EXIF metadata saying "display this rotated" that some programs do or don't pay attention to. I suspect the image in question has that EXIF instruction (even though landscape is the best way to look at this image) and Windows Photo Viewer is ignoring it, leading to confusion in what rotations are required for correct display elsewhere.

    – WBT
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:17











  • FWIW, it seems like Windows Photo Viewer doesn’t pay attention to EXIF data and possible solutions are explained here.

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:19



















  • This is all based on how each program pays attention to and respects the EXIF orientation information stored in the image. Some care about it, some don’t. Which does and why and how to adjust each one is idiosyncratic to each piece of software.

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 15:45






  • 1





    OK, so how would one adjust Windows Photo Viewer to pay attention to EXIF orientation information?

    – WBT
    Sep 19 '15 at 15:53











  • Read your own question. “…the "landscape" orientation is photographically correct, though the camera may have been in a funny position causing an accelerometer to think that a "portrait" orientation was intended.” Windows Photo Viewer seems to be paying attention to the EXIF info since it is “correct” in displaying it “incorrectly.” Everything else is incorrect? Or maybe I have that backwards?

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:13











  • @JakeGould My understanding is that cameras record the image in "landscape" format and sometimes add EXIF metadata saying "display this rotated" that some programs do or don't pay attention to. I suspect the image in question has that EXIF instruction (even though landscape is the best way to look at this image) and Windows Photo Viewer is ignoring it, leading to confusion in what rotations are required for correct display elsewhere.

    – WBT
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:17











  • FWIW, it seems like Windows Photo Viewer doesn’t pay attention to EXIF data and possible solutions are explained here.

    – JakeGould
    Sep 19 '15 at 16:19

















This is all based on how each program pays attention to and respects the EXIF orientation information stored in the image. Some care about it, some don’t. Which does and why and how to adjust each one is idiosyncratic to each piece of software.

– JakeGould
Sep 19 '15 at 15:45





This is all based on how each program pays attention to and respects the EXIF orientation information stored in the image. Some care about it, some don’t. Which does and why and how to adjust each one is idiosyncratic to each piece of software.

– JakeGould
Sep 19 '15 at 15:45




1




1





OK, so how would one adjust Windows Photo Viewer to pay attention to EXIF orientation information?

– WBT
Sep 19 '15 at 15:53





OK, so how would one adjust Windows Photo Viewer to pay attention to EXIF orientation information?

– WBT
Sep 19 '15 at 15:53













Read your own question. “…the "landscape" orientation is photographically correct, though the camera may have been in a funny position causing an accelerometer to think that a "portrait" orientation was intended.” Windows Photo Viewer seems to be paying attention to the EXIF info since it is “correct” in displaying it “incorrectly.” Everything else is incorrect? Or maybe I have that backwards?

– JakeGould
Sep 19 '15 at 16:13





Read your own question. “…the "landscape" orientation is photographically correct, though the camera may have been in a funny position causing an accelerometer to think that a "portrait" orientation was intended.” Windows Photo Viewer seems to be paying attention to the EXIF info since it is “correct” in displaying it “incorrectly.” Everything else is incorrect? Or maybe I have that backwards?

– JakeGould
Sep 19 '15 at 16:13













@JakeGould My understanding is that cameras record the image in "landscape" format and sometimes add EXIF metadata saying "display this rotated" that some programs do or don't pay attention to. I suspect the image in question has that EXIF instruction (even though landscape is the best way to look at this image) and Windows Photo Viewer is ignoring it, leading to confusion in what rotations are required for correct display elsewhere.

– WBT
Sep 19 '15 at 16:17





@JakeGould My understanding is that cameras record the image in "landscape" format and sometimes add EXIF metadata saying "display this rotated" that some programs do or don't pay attention to. I suspect the image in question has that EXIF instruction (even though landscape is the best way to look at this image) and Windows Photo Viewer is ignoring it, leading to confusion in what rotations are required for correct display elsewhere.

– WBT
Sep 19 '15 at 16:17













FWIW, it seems like Windows Photo Viewer doesn’t pay attention to EXIF data and possible solutions are explained here.

– JakeGould
Sep 19 '15 at 16:19





FWIW, it seems like Windows Photo Viewer doesn’t pay attention to EXIF data and possible solutions are explained here.

– JakeGould
Sep 19 '15 at 16:19










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I had exactly the same problem. Found out that [exif:Orientation:] is only respected by some programs.



I have Bash Ubuntu for Windows 10 so I checked the exif data by using:
root@AW:/mnt/c/Users/me/Dropbox/Photos/folder# identify -verbose * |grep -i exif:orientation
exif:Orientation: 6
exif:Orientation: 3
exif:Orientation: 3
exif:Orientation: 3
exif:Orientation: 6
exif:Orientation: 6
exif:Orientation: 6



Then I used jhead -autorot * in that folder. I then checked the exif data again, even though it showed correctly in the application I was using.



root@AW:/mnt/c/Users/me/Dropbox/Photos/folder# identify -verbose * |grep -i exif:orientation
exif:Orientation: 1
exif:Orientation: 1
exif:Orientation: 1
exif:Orientation: 1
exif:Orientation: 1
exif:Orientation: 1
exif:Orientation: 1



Since you're using Win 7 you won't have Ubuntu for Windows, unless you've upgraded by now.



Here is some very useful information from: http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/exif-orientation.html



"Auto-Rotation Utilities
There are several tools that allow the image content to be rotated losslessly in software, based on the information stored in the EXIF orientation flag. By far the best time to perform this is during image import (e.g. from memory card). Most import applications (such as DownloaderPro) can do this during the copy operation (from memory card to hard drive). Doing so ensure that all programs can see the image properly rotated, without having to rely on the EXIF Orientation flag. This means that even programs such as Microsoft's Windows Picture and Fax Viewer will also show correct orientation for portrait / vertical images.



Most programs will rotate the image content and then update the Orientation flag to reflect the new orientation (usually a value of 1), while still leaving other metadata intact."



Win 8 & 10 - Default Windows Photo Viewer - reads the exif tags and correctly displays the image.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f975288%2fwhy-arent-images-rotated-in-windows-photo-viewer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I had exactly the same problem. Found out that [exif:Orientation:] is only respected by some programs.



    I have Bash Ubuntu for Windows 10 so I checked the exif data by using:
    root@AW:/mnt/c/Users/me/Dropbox/Photos/folder# identify -verbose * |grep -i exif:orientation
    exif:Orientation: 6
    exif:Orientation: 3
    exif:Orientation: 3
    exif:Orientation: 3
    exif:Orientation: 6
    exif:Orientation: 6
    exif:Orientation: 6



    Then I used jhead -autorot * in that folder. I then checked the exif data again, even though it showed correctly in the application I was using.



    root@AW:/mnt/c/Users/me/Dropbox/Photos/folder# identify -verbose * |grep -i exif:orientation
    exif:Orientation: 1
    exif:Orientation: 1
    exif:Orientation: 1
    exif:Orientation: 1
    exif:Orientation: 1
    exif:Orientation: 1
    exif:Orientation: 1



    Since you're using Win 7 you won't have Ubuntu for Windows, unless you've upgraded by now.



    Here is some very useful information from: http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/exif-orientation.html



    "Auto-Rotation Utilities
    There are several tools that allow the image content to be rotated losslessly in software, based on the information stored in the EXIF orientation flag. By far the best time to perform this is during image import (e.g. from memory card). Most import applications (such as DownloaderPro) can do this during the copy operation (from memory card to hard drive). Doing so ensure that all programs can see the image properly rotated, without having to rely on the EXIF Orientation flag. This means that even programs such as Microsoft's Windows Picture and Fax Viewer will also show correct orientation for portrait / vertical images.



    Most programs will rotate the image content and then update the Orientation flag to reflect the new orientation (usually a value of 1), while still leaving other metadata intact."



    Win 8 & 10 - Default Windows Photo Viewer - reads the exif tags and correctly displays the image.






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      I had exactly the same problem. Found out that [exif:Orientation:] is only respected by some programs.



      I have Bash Ubuntu for Windows 10 so I checked the exif data by using:
      root@AW:/mnt/c/Users/me/Dropbox/Photos/folder# identify -verbose * |grep -i exif:orientation
      exif:Orientation: 6
      exif:Orientation: 3
      exif:Orientation: 3
      exif:Orientation: 3
      exif:Orientation: 6
      exif:Orientation: 6
      exif:Orientation: 6



      Then I used jhead -autorot * in that folder. I then checked the exif data again, even though it showed correctly in the application I was using.



      root@AW:/mnt/c/Users/me/Dropbox/Photos/folder# identify -verbose * |grep -i exif:orientation
      exif:Orientation: 1
      exif:Orientation: 1
      exif:Orientation: 1
      exif:Orientation: 1
      exif:Orientation: 1
      exif:Orientation: 1
      exif:Orientation: 1



      Since you're using Win 7 you won't have Ubuntu for Windows, unless you've upgraded by now.



      Here is some very useful information from: http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/exif-orientation.html



      "Auto-Rotation Utilities
      There are several tools that allow the image content to be rotated losslessly in software, based on the information stored in the EXIF orientation flag. By far the best time to perform this is during image import (e.g. from memory card). Most import applications (such as DownloaderPro) can do this during the copy operation (from memory card to hard drive). Doing so ensure that all programs can see the image properly rotated, without having to rely on the EXIF Orientation flag. This means that even programs such as Microsoft's Windows Picture and Fax Viewer will also show correct orientation for portrait / vertical images.



      Most programs will rotate the image content and then update the Orientation flag to reflect the new orientation (usually a value of 1), while still leaving other metadata intact."



      Win 8 & 10 - Default Windows Photo Viewer - reads the exif tags and correctly displays the image.






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        I had exactly the same problem. Found out that [exif:Orientation:] is only respected by some programs.



        I have Bash Ubuntu for Windows 10 so I checked the exif data by using:
        root@AW:/mnt/c/Users/me/Dropbox/Photos/folder# identify -verbose * |grep -i exif:orientation
        exif:Orientation: 6
        exif:Orientation: 3
        exif:Orientation: 3
        exif:Orientation: 3
        exif:Orientation: 6
        exif:Orientation: 6
        exif:Orientation: 6



        Then I used jhead -autorot * in that folder. I then checked the exif data again, even though it showed correctly in the application I was using.



        root@AW:/mnt/c/Users/me/Dropbox/Photos/folder# identify -verbose * |grep -i exif:orientation
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1



        Since you're using Win 7 you won't have Ubuntu for Windows, unless you've upgraded by now.



        Here is some very useful information from: http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/exif-orientation.html



        "Auto-Rotation Utilities
        There are several tools that allow the image content to be rotated losslessly in software, based on the information stored in the EXIF orientation flag. By far the best time to perform this is during image import (e.g. from memory card). Most import applications (such as DownloaderPro) can do this during the copy operation (from memory card to hard drive). Doing so ensure that all programs can see the image properly rotated, without having to rely on the EXIF Orientation flag. This means that even programs such as Microsoft's Windows Picture and Fax Viewer will also show correct orientation for portrait / vertical images.



        Most programs will rotate the image content and then update the Orientation flag to reflect the new orientation (usually a value of 1), while still leaving other metadata intact."



        Win 8 & 10 - Default Windows Photo Viewer - reads the exif tags and correctly displays the image.






        share|improve this answer













        I had exactly the same problem. Found out that [exif:Orientation:] is only respected by some programs.



        I have Bash Ubuntu for Windows 10 so I checked the exif data by using:
        root@AW:/mnt/c/Users/me/Dropbox/Photos/folder# identify -verbose * |grep -i exif:orientation
        exif:Orientation: 6
        exif:Orientation: 3
        exif:Orientation: 3
        exif:Orientation: 3
        exif:Orientation: 6
        exif:Orientation: 6
        exif:Orientation: 6



        Then I used jhead -autorot * in that folder. I then checked the exif data again, even though it showed correctly in the application I was using.



        root@AW:/mnt/c/Users/me/Dropbox/Photos/folder# identify -verbose * |grep -i exif:orientation
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1
        exif:Orientation: 1



        Since you're using Win 7 you won't have Ubuntu for Windows, unless you've upgraded by now.



        Here is some very useful information from: http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/exif-orientation.html



        "Auto-Rotation Utilities
        There are several tools that allow the image content to be rotated losslessly in software, based on the information stored in the EXIF orientation flag. By far the best time to perform this is during image import (e.g. from memory card). Most import applications (such as DownloaderPro) can do this during the copy operation (from memory card to hard drive). Doing so ensure that all programs can see the image properly rotated, without having to rely on the EXIF Orientation flag. This means that even programs such as Microsoft's Windows Picture and Fax Viewer will also show correct orientation for portrait / vertical images.



        Most programs will rotate the image content and then update the Orientation flag to reflect the new orientation (usually a value of 1), while still leaving other metadata intact."



        Win 8 & 10 - Default Windows Photo Viewer - reads the exif tags and correctly displays the image.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Oct 25 '17 at 19:18









        AdrianAdrian

        12




        12






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f975288%2fwhy-arent-images-rotated-in-windows-photo-viewer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix

            “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis