Does there exist any probability density function ‎$‎f:‎mathbb{R}to‎mathbb{R}‎$ ‎which is not...












4












$begingroup$


Let‎ ‎$‎‎f:‎mathbb{R}to‎mathbb{R}‎$ be a probability density function. Can ‎the following be happened for ‎$‎‎f$?



(1) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎not ‎integrable ‎on ‎an ‎(some) ‎interval ‎of ‎‎$mathbb{R}‎$.



‎(2) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎not ‎integrable ‎on every closed ‎interval ‎of ‎‎$mathbb{R}‎$.‎‎‎

I know that ‎if $‎f‎$ ‎is a‎ ‎‎probability density function then



(1) ‎$‎‎f(x)‎geq‎0 ‎quad‎text{for all} ; x$,



(2) ‎$int_{-‎infty‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx=1$.



but ‎here ‎we ‎have‎ Lebesgue integral not Riemann integral. Moreover if ‎$‎‎f$ ‎wants ‎to ‎be‎ Riemann integrable on the whole $mathbb{R}‎$, it must hold in the following conditions



‎‎(a) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎integrable ‎on every closed ‎interval ‎of ‎$mathbb{R},‎$



(b) the following integral is convergent‎



$$int_{-‎infty‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx=‎‎int_{-‎infty‎}^{0}f(x),dx+int_{0‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx.$$



According the mentioned things, the most pdf are ‎ Riemann integrable, and I could not find any example as I asked. Would anyone help me to find that. thanks a lot.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
    $endgroup$
    – d.k.o.
    Dec 20 '18 at 7:37
















4












$begingroup$


Let‎ ‎$‎‎f:‎mathbb{R}to‎mathbb{R}‎$ be a probability density function. Can ‎the following be happened for ‎$‎‎f$?



(1) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎not ‎integrable ‎on ‎an ‎(some) ‎interval ‎of ‎‎$mathbb{R}‎$.



‎(2) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎not ‎integrable ‎on every closed ‎interval ‎of ‎‎$mathbb{R}‎$.‎‎‎

I know that ‎if $‎f‎$ ‎is a‎ ‎‎probability density function then



(1) ‎$‎‎f(x)‎geq‎0 ‎quad‎text{for all} ; x$,



(2) ‎$int_{-‎infty‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx=1$.



but ‎here ‎we ‎have‎ Lebesgue integral not Riemann integral. Moreover if ‎$‎‎f$ ‎wants ‎to ‎be‎ Riemann integrable on the whole $mathbb{R}‎$, it must hold in the following conditions



‎‎(a) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎integrable ‎on every closed ‎interval ‎of ‎$mathbb{R},‎$



(b) the following integral is convergent‎



$$int_{-‎infty‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx=‎‎int_{-‎infty‎}^{0}f(x),dx+int_{0‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx.$$



According the mentioned things, the most pdf are ‎ Riemann integrable, and I could not find any example as I asked. Would anyone help me to find that. thanks a lot.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
    $endgroup$
    – d.k.o.
    Dec 20 '18 at 7:37














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


Let‎ ‎$‎‎f:‎mathbb{R}to‎mathbb{R}‎$ be a probability density function. Can ‎the following be happened for ‎$‎‎f$?



(1) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎not ‎integrable ‎on ‎an ‎(some) ‎interval ‎of ‎‎$mathbb{R}‎$.



‎(2) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎not ‎integrable ‎on every closed ‎interval ‎of ‎‎$mathbb{R}‎$.‎‎‎

I know that ‎if $‎f‎$ ‎is a‎ ‎‎probability density function then



(1) ‎$‎‎f(x)‎geq‎0 ‎quad‎text{for all} ; x$,



(2) ‎$int_{-‎infty‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx=1$.



but ‎here ‎we ‎have‎ Lebesgue integral not Riemann integral. Moreover if ‎$‎‎f$ ‎wants ‎to ‎be‎ Riemann integrable on the whole $mathbb{R}‎$, it must hold in the following conditions



‎‎(a) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎integrable ‎on every closed ‎interval ‎of ‎$mathbb{R},‎$



(b) the following integral is convergent‎



$$int_{-‎infty‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx=‎‎int_{-‎infty‎}^{0}f(x),dx+int_{0‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx.$$



According the mentioned things, the most pdf are ‎ Riemann integrable, and I could not find any example as I asked. Would anyone help me to find that. thanks a lot.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let‎ ‎$‎‎f:‎mathbb{R}to‎mathbb{R}‎$ be a probability density function. Can ‎the following be happened for ‎$‎‎f$?



(1) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎not ‎integrable ‎on ‎an ‎(some) ‎interval ‎of ‎‎$mathbb{R}‎$.



‎(2) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎not ‎integrable ‎on every closed ‎interval ‎of ‎‎$mathbb{R}‎$.‎‎‎

I know that ‎if $‎f‎$ ‎is a‎ ‎‎probability density function then



(1) ‎$‎‎f(x)‎geq‎0 ‎quad‎text{for all} ; x$,



(2) ‎$int_{-‎infty‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx=1$.



but ‎here ‎we ‎have‎ Lebesgue integral not Riemann integral. Moreover if ‎$‎‎f$ ‎wants ‎to ‎be‎ Riemann integrable on the whole $mathbb{R}‎$, it must hold in the following conditions



‎‎(a) ‎‎$‎‎f$ ‎is ‎integrable ‎on every closed ‎interval ‎of ‎$mathbb{R},‎$



(b) the following integral is convergent‎



$$int_{-‎infty‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx=‎‎int_{-‎infty‎}^{0}f(x),dx+int_{0‎}^{+infty}f(x),dx.$$



According the mentioned things, the most pdf are ‎ Riemann integrable, and I could not find any example as I asked. Would anyone help me to find that. thanks a lot.







probability integration probability-theory probability-distributions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 20 '18 at 7:39









Lord Shark the Unknown

105k1160133




105k1160133










asked Dec 20 '18 at 7:25









soodehMehboodisoodehMehboodi

62138




62138












  • $begingroup$
    Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
    $endgroup$
    – d.k.o.
    Dec 20 '18 at 7:37


















  • $begingroup$
    Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
    $endgroup$
    – d.k.o.
    Dec 20 '18 at 7:37
















$begingroup$
Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 20 '18 at 7:37




$begingroup$
Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 20 '18 at 7:37










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

It is known that there exists a measurable set $E$ in $mathbb R$ such that $0<m(Ecap I) <m(I)$ for every open interval $I$. If $f=frac {I_E} {m(E)}$ then $f$ is a density function but it is not continuous at any point so it is not Riemann integrable on any interval.



For the construction of such a set $E$ see Creating a Lebesgue measurable set with peculiar property.



It is easy give simpler examples where $f$ is almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function but it is not itself Riemann integarble. In probability theory density function which are equal almost everywhere lead to the same distribution, so I tried to give a example which is not almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
    $endgroup$
    – Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
    Dec 20 '18 at 7:44










  • $begingroup$
    This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 20 '18 at 8:27










  • $begingroup$
    I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 20 '18 at 8:51





















2












$begingroup$

$$
f(x) = begin{cases}
0 &; xinBbb Q cap[0,1] \
1 &; xinBbb Q^c cap[0,1]
end{cases}
$$

is a probability density function that is not Riemann integrable.



If you want a density function that is not Riemann integrable on any interval in $Bbb R$ then you can take $f$ to be the (normalized) Gaussian distribution and then $f+mathbf 1_{Bbb Q}$ is the desired probability density function with the properties you want.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047260%2fdoes-there-exist-any-probability-density-function-f-mathbbr-to-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    It is known that there exists a measurable set $E$ in $mathbb R$ such that $0<m(Ecap I) <m(I)$ for every open interval $I$. If $f=frac {I_E} {m(E)}$ then $f$ is a density function but it is not continuous at any point so it is not Riemann integrable on any interval.



    For the construction of such a set $E$ see Creating a Lebesgue measurable set with peculiar property.



    It is easy give simpler examples where $f$ is almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function but it is not itself Riemann integarble. In probability theory density function which are equal almost everywhere lead to the same distribution, so I tried to give a example which is not almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
      $endgroup$
      – Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
      Dec 20 '18 at 7:44










    • $begingroup$
      This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
      $endgroup$
      – BigbearZzz
      Dec 20 '18 at 8:27










    • $begingroup$
      I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
      $endgroup$
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      Dec 20 '18 at 8:51


















    5












    $begingroup$

    It is known that there exists a measurable set $E$ in $mathbb R$ such that $0<m(Ecap I) <m(I)$ for every open interval $I$. If $f=frac {I_E} {m(E)}$ then $f$ is a density function but it is not continuous at any point so it is not Riemann integrable on any interval.



    For the construction of such a set $E$ see Creating a Lebesgue measurable set with peculiar property.



    It is easy give simpler examples where $f$ is almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function but it is not itself Riemann integarble. In probability theory density function which are equal almost everywhere lead to the same distribution, so I tried to give a example which is not almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
      $endgroup$
      – Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
      Dec 20 '18 at 7:44










    • $begingroup$
      This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
      $endgroup$
      – BigbearZzz
      Dec 20 '18 at 8:27










    • $begingroup$
      I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
      $endgroup$
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      Dec 20 '18 at 8:51
















    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    It is known that there exists a measurable set $E$ in $mathbb R$ such that $0<m(Ecap I) <m(I)$ for every open interval $I$. If $f=frac {I_E} {m(E)}$ then $f$ is a density function but it is not continuous at any point so it is not Riemann integrable on any interval.



    For the construction of such a set $E$ see Creating a Lebesgue measurable set with peculiar property.



    It is easy give simpler examples where $f$ is almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function but it is not itself Riemann integarble. In probability theory density function which are equal almost everywhere lead to the same distribution, so I tried to give a example which is not almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    It is known that there exists a measurable set $E$ in $mathbb R$ such that $0<m(Ecap I) <m(I)$ for every open interval $I$. If $f=frac {I_E} {m(E)}$ then $f$ is a density function but it is not continuous at any point so it is not Riemann integrable on any interval.



    For the construction of such a set $E$ see Creating a Lebesgue measurable set with peculiar property.



    It is easy give simpler examples where $f$ is almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function but it is not itself Riemann integarble. In probability theory density function which are equal almost everywhere lead to the same distribution, so I tried to give a example which is not almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 20 '18 at 8:50

























    answered Dec 20 '18 at 7:38









    Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

    64.1k42464




    64.1k42464












    • $begingroup$
      This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
      $endgroup$
      – Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
      Dec 20 '18 at 7:44










    • $begingroup$
      This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
      $endgroup$
      – BigbearZzz
      Dec 20 '18 at 8:27










    • $begingroup$
      I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
      $endgroup$
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      Dec 20 '18 at 8:51




















    • $begingroup$
      This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
      $endgroup$
      – Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
      Dec 20 '18 at 7:44










    • $begingroup$
      This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
      $endgroup$
      – BigbearZzz
      Dec 20 '18 at 8:27










    • $begingroup$
      I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
      $endgroup$
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      Dec 20 '18 at 8:51


















    $begingroup$
    This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
    $endgroup$
    – Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
    Dec 20 '18 at 7:44




    $begingroup$
    This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
    $endgroup$
    – Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
    Dec 20 '18 at 7:44












    $begingroup$
    This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 20 '18 at 8:27




    $begingroup$
    This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 20 '18 at 8:27












    $begingroup$
    I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 20 '18 at 8:51






    $begingroup$
    I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 20 '18 at 8:51













    2












    $begingroup$

    $$
    f(x) = begin{cases}
    0 &; xinBbb Q cap[0,1] \
    1 &; xinBbb Q^c cap[0,1]
    end{cases}
    $$

    is a probability density function that is not Riemann integrable.



    If you want a density function that is not Riemann integrable on any interval in $Bbb R$ then you can take $f$ to be the (normalized) Gaussian distribution and then $f+mathbf 1_{Bbb Q}$ is the desired probability density function with the properties you want.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      $$
      f(x) = begin{cases}
      0 &; xinBbb Q cap[0,1] \
      1 &; xinBbb Q^c cap[0,1]
      end{cases}
      $$

      is a probability density function that is not Riemann integrable.



      If you want a density function that is not Riemann integrable on any interval in $Bbb R$ then you can take $f$ to be the (normalized) Gaussian distribution and then $f+mathbf 1_{Bbb Q}$ is the desired probability density function with the properties you want.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        $$
        f(x) = begin{cases}
        0 &; xinBbb Q cap[0,1] \
        1 &; xinBbb Q^c cap[0,1]
        end{cases}
        $$

        is a probability density function that is not Riemann integrable.



        If you want a density function that is not Riemann integrable on any interval in $Bbb R$ then you can take $f$ to be the (normalized) Gaussian distribution and then $f+mathbf 1_{Bbb Q}$ is the desired probability density function with the properties you want.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $$
        f(x) = begin{cases}
        0 &; xinBbb Q cap[0,1] \
        1 &; xinBbb Q^c cap[0,1]
        end{cases}
        $$

        is a probability density function that is not Riemann integrable.



        If you want a density function that is not Riemann integrable on any interval in $Bbb R$ then you can take $f$ to be the (normalized) Gaussian distribution and then $f+mathbf 1_{Bbb Q}$ is the desired probability density function with the properties you want.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 20 '18 at 7:40









        BigbearZzzBigbearZzz

        8,88821652




        8,88821652






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047260%2fdoes-there-exist-any-probability-density-function-f-mathbbr-to-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix

            “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis