Does there exist any probability density function $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ which is not...
$begingroup$
Let $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ be a probability density function. Can the following be happened for $f$?
(1) $f$ is not integrable on an (some) interval of $mathbb{R}$.
(2) $f$ is not integrable on every closed interval of $mathbb{R}$.
I know that if $f$ is a probability density function then
(1) $f(x)geq0 quadtext{for all} ; x$,
(2) $int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x),dx=1$.
but here we have Lebesgue integral not Riemann integral. Moreover if $f$ wants to be Riemann integrable on the whole $mathbb{R}$, it must hold in the following conditions
(a) $f$ is integrable on every closed interval of $mathbb{R},$
(b) the following integral is convergent
$$int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x),dx=int_{-infty}^{0}f(x),dx+int_{0}^{+infty}f(x),dx.$$
According the mentioned things, the most pdf are Riemann integrable, and I could not find any example as I asked. Would anyone help me to find that. thanks a lot.
probability integration probability-theory probability-distributions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ be a probability density function. Can the following be happened for $f$?
(1) $f$ is not integrable on an (some) interval of $mathbb{R}$.
(2) $f$ is not integrable on every closed interval of $mathbb{R}$.
I know that if $f$ is a probability density function then
(1) $f(x)geq0 quadtext{for all} ; x$,
(2) $int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x),dx=1$.
but here we have Lebesgue integral not Riemann integral. Moreover if $f$ wants to be Riemann integrable on the whole $mathbb{R}$, it must hold in the following conditions
(a) $f$ is integrable on every closed interval of $mathbb{R},$
(b) the following integral is convergent
$$int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x),dx=int_{-infty}^{0}f(x),dx+int_{0}^{+infty}f(x),dx.$$
According the mentioned things, the most pdf are Riemann integrable, and I could not find any example as I asked. Would anyone help me to find that. thanks a lot.
probability integration probability-theory probability-distributions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 20 '18 at 7:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ be a probability density function. Can the following be happened for $f$?
(1) $f$ is not integrable on an (some) interval of $mathbb{R}$.
(2) $f$ is not integrable on every closed interval of $mathbb{R}$.
I know that if $f$ is a probability density function then
(1) $f(x)geq0 quadtext{for all} ; x$,
(2) $int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x),dx=1$.
but here we have Lebesgue integral not Riemann integral. Moreover if $f$ wants to be Riemann integrable on the whole $mathbb{R}$, it must hold in the following conditions
(a) $f$ is integrable on every closed interval of $mathbb{R},$
(b) the following integral is convergent
$$int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x),dx=int_{-infty}^{0}f(x),dx+int_{0}^{+infty}f(x),dx.$$
According the mentioned things, the most pdf are Riemann integrable, and I could not find any example as I asked. Would anyone help me to find that. thanks a lot.
probability integration probability-theory probability-distributions
$endgroup$
Let $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$ be a probability density function. Can the following be happened for $f$?
(1) $f$ is not integrable on an (some) interval of $mathbb{R}$.
(2) $f$ is not integrable on every closed interval of $mathbb{R}$.
I know that if $f$ is a probability density function then
(1) $f(x)geq0 quadtext{for all} ; x$,
(2) $int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x),dx=1$.
but here we have Lebesgue integral not Riemann integral. Moreover if $f$ wants to be Riemann integrable on the whole $mathbb{R}$, it must hold in the following conditions
(a) $f$ is integrable on every closed interval of $mathbb{R},$
(b) the following integral is convergent
$$int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x),dx=int_{-infty}^{0}f(x),dx+int_{0}^{+infty}f(x),dx.$$
According the mentioned things, the most pdf are Riemann integrable, and I could not find any example as I asked. Would anyone help me to find that. thanks a lot.
probability integration probability-theory probability-distributions
probability integration probability-theory probability-distributions
edited Dec 20 '18 at 7:39
Lord Shark the Unknown
105k1160133
105k1160133
asked Dec 20 '18 at 7:25
soodehMehboodisoodehMehboodi
62138
62138
$begingroup$
Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 20 '18 at 7:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 20 '18 at 7:37
$begingroup$
Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 20 '18 at 7:37
$begingroup$
Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 20 '18 at 7:37
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is known that there exists a measurable set $E$ in $mathbb R$ such that $0<m(Ecap I) <m(I)$ for every open interval $I$. If $f=frac {I_E} {m(E)}$ then $f$ is a density function but it is not continuous at any point so it is not Riemann integrable on any interval.
For the construction of such a set $E$ see Creating a Lebesgue measurable set with peculiar property.
It is easy give simpler examples where $f$ is almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function but it is not itself Riemann integarble. In probability theory density function which are equal almost everywhere lead to the same distribution, so I tried to give a example which is not almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
– Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
Dec 20 '18 at 7:44
$begingroup$
This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 20 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 20 '18 at 8:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$
f(x) = begin{cases}
0 &; xinBbb Q cap[0,1] \
1 &; xinBbb Q^c cap[0,1]
end{cases}
$$
is a probability density function that is not Riemann integrable.
If you want a density function that is not Riemann integrable on any interval in $Bbb R$ then you can take $f$ to be the (normalized) Gaussian distribution and then $f+mathbf 1_{Bbb Q}$ is the desired probability density function with the properties you want.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047260%2fdoes-there-exist-any-probability-density-function-f-mathbbr-to-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is known that there exists a measurable set $E$ in $mathbb R$ such that $0<m(Ecap I) <m(I)$ for every open interval $I$. If $f=frac {I_E} {m(E)}$ then $f$ is a density function but it is not continuous at any point so it is not Riemann integrable on any interval.
For the construction of such a set $E$ see Creating a Lebesgue measurable set with peculiar property.
It is easy give simpler examples where $f$ is almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function but it is not itself Riemann integarble. In probability theory density function which are equal almost everywhere lead to the same distribution, so I tried to give a example which is not almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
– Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
Dec 20 '18 at 7:44
$begingroup$
This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 20 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 20 '18 at 8:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is known that there exists a measurable set $E$ in $mathbb R$ such that $0<m(Ecap I) <m(I)$ for every open interval $I$. If $f=frac {I_E} {m(E)}$ then $f$ is a density function but it is not continuous at any point so it is not Riemann integrable on any interval.
For the construction of such a set $E$ see Creating a Lebesgue measurable set with peculiar property.
It is easy give simpler examples where $f$ is almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function but it is not itself Riemann integarble. In probability theory density function which are equal almost everywhere lead to the same distribution, so I tried to give a example which is not almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
– Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
Dec 20 '18 at 7:44
$begingroup$
This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 20 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 20 '18 at 8:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is known that there exists a measurable set $E$ in $mathbb R$ such that $0<m(Ecap I) <m(I)$ for every open interval $I$. If $f=frac {I_E} {m(E)}$ then $f$ is a density function but it is not continuous at any point so it is not Riemann integrable on any interval.
For the construction of such a set $E$ see Creating a Lebesgue measurable set with peculiar property.
It is easy give simpler examples where $f$ is almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function but it is not itself Riemann integarble. In probability theory density function which are equal almost everywhere lead to the same distribution, so I tried to give a example which is not almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
It is known that there exists a measurable set $E$ in $mathbb R$ such that $0<m(Ecap I) <m(I)$ for every open interval $I$. If $f=frac {I_E} {m(E)}$ then $f$ is a density function but it is not continuous at any point so it is not Riemann integrable on any interval.
For the construction of such a set $E$ see Creating a Lebesgue measurable set with peculiar property.
It is easy give simpler examples where $f$ is almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function but it is not itself Riemann integarble. In probability theory density function which are equal almost everywhere lead to the same distribution, so I tried to give a example which is not almost everywhere equal to a Riemann integrable function.
edited Dec 20 '18 at 8:50
answered Dec 20 '18 at 7:38
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
64.1k42464
64.1k42464
$begingroup$
This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
– Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
Dec 20 '18 at 7:44
$begingroup$
This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 20 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 20 '18 at 8:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
– Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
Dec 20 '18 at 7:44
$begingroup$
This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 20 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 20 '18 at 8:51
$begingroup$
This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
– Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
Dec 20 '18 at 7:44
$begingroup$
This is very nice since, also, $f$ is not a.e. equal to a Riemann integrable function.
$endgroup$
– Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
Dec 20 '18 at 7:44
$begingroup$
This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 20 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
This is a very interesting example. Is the existence of such a set $E$ easy to prove?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 20 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 20 '18 at 8:51
$begingroup$
I have added a reference for that construction. @BigbearZzz
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 20 '18 at 8:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$
f(x) = begin{cases}
0 &; xinBbb Q cap[0,1] \
1 &; xinBbb Q^c cap[0,1]
end{cases}
$$
is a probability density function that is not Riemann integrable.
If you want a density function that is not Riemann integrable on any interval in $Bbb R$ then you can take $f$ to be the (normalized) Gaussian distribution and then $f+mathbf 1_{Bbb Q}$ is the desired probability density function with the properties you want.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$
f(x) = begin{cases}
0 &; xinBbb Q cap[0,1] \
1 &; xinBbb Q^c cap[0,1]
end{cases}
$$
is a probability density function that is not Riemann integrable.
If you want a density function that is not Riemann integrable on any interval in $Bbb R$ then you can take $f$ to be the (normalized) Gaussian distribution and then $f+mathbf 1_{Bbb Q}$ is the desired probability density function with the properties you want.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$
f(x) = begin{cases}
0 &; xinBbb Q cap[0,1] \
1 &; xinBbb Q^c cap[0,1]
end{cases}
$$
is a probability density function that is not Riemann integrable.
If you want a density function that is not Riemann integrable on any interval in $Bbb R$ then you can take $f$ to be the (normalized) Gaussian distribution and then $f+mathbf 1_{Bbb Q}$ is the desired probability density function with the properties you want.
$endgroup$
$$
f(x) = begin{cases}
0 &; xinBbb Q cap[0,1] \
1 &; xinBbb Q^c cap[0,1]
end{cases}
$$
is a probability density function that is not Riemann integrable.
If you want a density function that is not Riemann integrable on any interval in $Bbb R$ then you can take $f$ to be the (normalized) Gaussian distribution and then $f+mathbf 1_{Bbb Q}$ is the desired probability density function with the properties you want.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 7:40
BigbearZzzBigbearZzz
8,88821652
8,88821652
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047260%2fdoes-there-exist-any-probability-density-function-f-mathbbr-to-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Take $Xsim U[0,1]$. Then $g=1-1_{mathbb{Q}}$ is a version of $f_X$...
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 20 '18 at 7:37