Normalizer of upper triangular group in ${rm GL}(n,F)$












3












$begingroup$


The following question has already appeared on mathstack:




If $B$ is the subgroup of ${rm GL}(n,F)$ consisting of upper triangular matrices then normalizer of $B$ in ${rm GL}(n,F)$ is $B$ itself.




I know a proof of this using Bruhat decomposition of ${rm GL}(n,F)$.



Question: Can we prove above theorem without using Bruhat decomposition?





Why came to this question: Consider the general linear Lie algebra $L=mathfrak{gl}(n,F)$; in it, let $T=mathfrak{t}(n,F)$ be the upper triangular sub-algebra. Then normalizer of $T$ in $L$ is $T$ itslef, and this can be proved just by considering a very simple decomposition of ${mathfrak gl}(n,F)$: write any element as sum of upper triangular matrix and lower triangular matrix whose diagonal is $0$.



But then for problem above, is it necessary to use Bruhat decomposition?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    The following question has already appeared on mathstack:




    If $B$ is the subgroup of ${rm GL}(n,F)$ consisting of upper triangular matrices then normalizer of $B$ in ${rm GL}(n,F)$ is $B$ itself.




    I know a proof of this using Bruhat decomposition of ${rm GL}(n,F)$.



    Question: Can we prove above theorem without using Bruhat decomposition?





    Why came to this question: Consider the general linear Lie algebra $L=mathfrak{gl}(n,F)$; in it, let $T=mathfrak{t}(n,F)$ be the upper triangular sub-algebra. Then normalizer of $T$ in $L$ is $T$ itslef, and this can be proved just by considering a very simple decomposition of ${mathfrak gl}(n,F)$: write any element as sum of upper triangular matrix and lower triangular matrix whose diagonal is $0$.



    But then for problem above, is it necessary to use Bruhat decomposition?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      2



      $begingroup$


      The following question has already appeared on mathstack:




      If $B$ is the subgroup of ${rm GL}(n,F)$ consisting of upper triangular matrices then normalizer of $B$ in ${rm GL}(n,F)$ is $B$ itself.




      I know a proof of this using Bruhat decomposition of ${rm GL}(n,F)$.



      Question: Can we prove above theorem without using Bruhat decomposition?





      Why came to this question: Consider the general linear Lie algebra $L=mathfrak{gl}(n,F)$; in it, let $T=mathfrak{t}(n,F)$ be the upper triangular sub-algebra. Then normalizer of $T$ in $L$ is $T$ itslef, and this can be proved just by considering a very simple decomposition of ${mathfrak gl}(n,F)$: write any element as sum of upper triangular matrix and lower triangular matrix whose diagonal is $0$.



      But then for problem above, is it necessary to use Bruhat decomposition?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      The following question has already appeared on mathstack:




      If $B$ is the subgroup of ${rm GL}(n,F)$ consisting of upper triangular matrices then normalizer of $B$ in ${rm GL}(n,F)$ is $B$ itself.




      I know a proof of this using Bruhat decomposition of ${rm GL}(n,F)$.



      Question: Can we prove above theorem without using Bruhat decomposition?





      Why came to this question: Consider the general linear Lie algebra $L=mathfrak{gl}(n,F)$; in it, let $T=mathfrak{t}(n,F)$ be the upper triangular sub-algebra. Then normalizer of $T$ in $L$ is $T$ itslef, and this can be proved just by considering a very simple decomposition of ${mathfrak gl}(n,F)$: write any element as sum of upper triangular matrix and lower triangular matrix whose diagonal is $0$.



      But then for problem above, is it necessary to use Bruhat decomposition?







      abstract-algebra group-theory alternative-proof






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 7 '17 at 5:33









      BeginnerBeginner

      4,00611226




      4,00611226






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          $DeclareMathOperator{GL}{GL}$$newcommand{Span}[1]{leftlangle #1 rightrangle}$$newcommand{Set}[1]{left{ #1 right}}$Let $e_0, e_1, dots, e_{n-1}$ be a basis with respect to which $B$ is upper-triangular, and write
          $$
          V_i = Span{ e_j : j ge i}.
          $$
          Allow me to use row vectors, so that the group $G = GL(n, F)$ acts on the right.



          Then
          $$
          B = Set{b in G : V_i b subseteq V_i text{ for each $i$}}.
          $$
          Moreover,




          $V_{n-i}$ is the unique subspace $W$ of dimension $i$ such that $W B subseteq W$.




          This is proved by induction on $i$. For $i = 1$ we have that $V_{n-1}$ is the unique common eigenspace for the elements of $B$ (just consider the element of $B$ which is a single Jordan block of size $n times n$ and eigenvalue $1$, say), then pass to $V / V_{n-1}$ and use induction.



          Let $g in N_{G}(B)$. Then for each $b in B$ we have $g b g^{-1} in B$, that is for all $i$
          $$
          V_{i} g b g^{-1} subseteq V_i
          $$
          or
          $$
          (V_{i} g) b subseteq V_i g.
          $$
          It follows from the above that $V_{i} g = V_{i}$, so that $g in B$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            It can be shown by direct computation. First, we need the following lemma.






            Lemma. Let $gin GL(n,F)$. Let $h:=g^{-1}$. If there are entries of $g$ and $h$ such that
            $$g_{ij}neq 0,h_{kj}neq 0,i>j,kgeq j,$$
            then $g$ is not in $N(B)$, the normalizer of $B$.




            (Proof)Let $b=I+E_{jk}$, where $E_{jk}$ is the matrix whose entries are all zero except for the $(j,k)$-entry. Since $kgeq j$, $b$ is an element of $B$. Notice that $(gbg^{-1})_{ij}=(g)_{ij}(h)_{kj}neq 0$. So $gbg^{-1}$ is not upper triangular(, for $i>j$). Hence $gbg^{-1}not in B$. Therefore $gnot in N(B)$. $square$





            Now we prove that $N(B)=B$ by induction on $n$.



            Let us denote by $B_n$ the set of invertible upper triangular matrices of size n and by $N(B_n)$ its normalizer in $GL(n,F)$. Assuming that $N(B_{n-1})=B_{n-1}$, we prove $N(B_{n})=B_{n}$.



            Suppose that $g_0in N(B)$. Let $h_0:=g_0^{-1}$. Since $g_0$ and $h_0$ are invertible, neither of them has a column of zero. If we have $(g_0)_{i,1}neq 0, (h_0)_{k,1}neq 0$ for some $i,k$, then the above lemma implies that $i=1$. On the other hand, Since $g_0$ and $h_0$ are invertible, neither of them has a column of zero. Hence $g_0$ has the form$$g_0=left[begin{array}{cccc}
            d_1 & ast & cdots & ast\
            0 & ast & cdots & ast\
            vdots & & vdots\
            0 & ast & cdots & ast
            end{array}right].$$

            We then multiply a product $c_1$ of elementary matrices that corresponds to adding multiples of the first column to other columns, which is in $B$, to obtain an element $g_1:=g_0c_1$ of the form
            $$g_{1}=left[begin{array}{cccc}
            d_1 & 0 & cdots & 0\
            0 & ast & cdots & ast\
            vdots & & vdots\
            0 & ast & cdots & ast
            end{array}right].$$



            The $(n-1)times (n-1)$ matrix $g_1'$ that is obtained by deleting the first row and the first column of $g_1$ is in $N(B_{n-1})$; thus by induction hypothesis, $g_1'in B_{n-1}$. It follows that $g_1in B_{n}$. Hence $N(B_{n})subset B_{n}$.The converse inclusion holds trivially.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2087062%2fnormalizer-of-upper-triangular-group-in-rm-gln-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              6












              $begingroup$

              $DeclareMathOperator{GL}{GL}$$newcommand{Span}[1]{leftlangle #1 rightrangle}$$newcommand{Set}[1]{left{ #1 right}}$Let $e_0, e_1, dots, e_{n-1}$ be a basis with respect to which $B$ is upper-triangular, and write
              $$
              V_i = Span{ e_j : j ge i}.
              $$
              Allow me to use row vectors, so that the group $G = GL(n, F)$ acts on the right.



              Then
              $$
              B = Set{b in G : V_i b subseteq V_i text{ for each $i$}}.
              $$
              Moreover,




              $V_{n-i}$ is the unique subspace $W$ of dimension $i$ such that $W B subseteq W$.




              This is proved by induction on $i$. For $i = 1$ we have that $V_{n-1}$ is the unique common eigenspace for the elements of $B$ (just consider the element of $B$ which is a single Jordan block of size $n times n$ and eigenvalue $1$, say), then pass to $V / V_{n-1}$ and use induction.



              Let $g in N_{G}(B)$. Then for each $b in B$ we have $g b g^{-1} in B$, that is for all $i$
              $$
              V_{i} g b g^{-1} subseteq V_i
              $$
              or
              $$
              (V_{i} g) b subseteq V_i g.
              $$
              It follows from the above that $V_{i} g = V_{i}$, so that $g in B$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                6












                $begingroup$

                $DeclareMathOperator{GL}{GL}$$newcommand{Span}[1]{leftlangle #1 rightrangle}$$newcommand{Set}[1]{left{ #1 right}}$Let $e_0, e_1, dots, e_{n-1}$ be a basis with respect to which $B$ is upper-triangular, and write
                $$
                V_i = Span{ e_j : j ge i}.
                $$
                Allow me to use row vectors, so that the group $G = GL(n, F)$ acts on the right.



                Then
                $$
                B = Set{b in G : V_i b subseteq V_i text{ for each $i$}}.
                $$
                Moreover,




                $V_{n-i}$ is the unique subspace $W$ of dimension $i$ such that $W B subseteq W$.




                This is proved by induction on $i$. For $i = 1$ we have that $V_{n-1}$ is the unique common eigenspace for the elements of $B$ (just consider the element of $B$ which is a single Jordan block of size $n times n$ and eigenvalue $1$, say), then pass to $V / V_{n-1}$ and use induction.



                Let $g in N_{G}(B)$. Then for each $b in B$ we have $g b g^{-1} in B$, that is for all $i$
                $$
                V_{i} g b g^{-1} subseteq V_i
                $$
                or
                $$
                (V_{i} g) b subseteq V_i g.
                $$
                It follows from the above that $V_{i} g = V_{i}$, so that $g in B$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  6












                  6








                  6





                  $begingroup$

                  $DeclareMathOperator{GL}{GL}$$newcommand{Span}[1]{leftlangle #1 rightrangle}$$newcommand{Set}[1]{left{ #1 right}}$Let $e_0, e_1, dots, e_{n-1}$ be a basis with respect to which $B$ is upper-triangular, and write
                  $$
                  V_i = Span{ e_j : j ge i}.
                  $$
                  Allow me to use row vectors, so that the group $G = GL(n, F)$ acts on the right.



                  Then
                  $$
                  B = Set{b in G : V_i b subseteq V_i text{ for each $i$}}.
                  $$
                  Moreover,




                  $V_{n-i}$ is the unique subspace $W$ of dimension $i$ such that $W B subseteq W$.




                  This is proved by induction on $i$. For $i = 1$ we have that $V_{n-1}$ is the unique common eigenspace for the elements of $B$ (just consider the element of $B$ which is a single Jordan block of size $n times n$ and eigenvalue $1$, say), then pass to $V / V_{n-1}$ and use induction.



                  Let $g in N_{G}(B)$. Then for each $b in B$ we have $g b g^{-1} in B$, that is for all $i$
                  $$
                  V_{i} g b g^{-1} subseteq V_i
                  $$
                  or
                  $$
                  (V_{i} g) b subseteq V_i g.
                  $$
                  It follows from the above that $V_{i} g = V_{i}$, so that $g in B$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  $DeclareMathOperator{GL}{GL}$$newcommand{Span}[1]{leftlangle #1 rightrangle}$$newcommand{Set}[1]{left{ #1 right}}$Let $e_0, e_1, dots, e_{n-1}$ be a basis with respect to which $B$ is upper-triangular, and write
                  $$
                  V_i = Span{ e_j : j ge i}.
                  $$
                  Allow me to use row vectors, so that the group $G = GL(n, F)$ acts on the right.



                  Then
                  $$
                  B = Set{b in G : V_i b subseteq V_i text{ for each $i$}}.
                  $$
                  Moreover,




                  $V_{n-i}$ is the unique subspace $W$ of dimension $i$ such that $W B subseteq W$.




                  This is proved by induction on $i$. For $i = 1$ we have that $V_{n-1}$ is the unique common eigenspace for the elements of $B$ (just consider the element of $B$ which is a single Jordan block of size $n times n$ and eigenvalue $1$, say), then pass to $V / V_{n-1}$ and use induction.



                  Let $g in N_{G}(B)$. Then for each $b in B$ we have $g b g^{-1} in B$, that is for all $i$
                  $$
                  V_{i} g b g^{-1} subseteq V_i
                  $$
                  or
                  $$
                  (V_{i} g) b subseteq V_i g.
                  $$
                  It follows from the above that $V_{i} g = V_{i}$, so that $g in B$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 16 '18 at 12:51

























                  answered Jan 7 '17 at 10:45









                  Andreas CarantiAndreas Caranti

                  56.9k34397




                  56.9k34397























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      It can be shown by direct computation. First, we need the following lemma.






                      Lemma. Let $gin GL(n,F)$. Let $h:=g^{-1}$. If there are entries of $g$ and $h$ such that
                      $$g_{ij}neq 0,h_{kj}neq 0,i>j,kgeq j,$$
                      then $g$ is not in $N(B)$, the normalizer of $B$.




                      (Proof)Let $b=I+E_{jk}$, where $E_{jk}$ is the matrix whose entries are all zero except for the $(j,k)$-entry. Since $kgeq j$, $b$ is an element of $B$. Notice that $(gbg^{-1})_{ij}=(g)_{ij}(h)_{kj}neq 0$. So $gbg^{-1}$ is not upper triangular(, for $i>j$). Hence $gbg^{-1}not in B$. Therefore $gnot in N(B)$. $square$





                      Now we prove that $N(B)=B$ by induction on $n$.



                      Let us denote by $B_n$ the set of invertible upper triangular matrices of size n and by $N(B_n)$ its normalizer in $GL(n,F)$. Assuming that $N(B_{n-1})=B_{n-1}$, we prove $N(B_{n})=B_{n}$.



                      Suppose that $g_0in N(B)$. Let $h_0:=g_0^{-1}$. Since $g_0$ and $h_0$ are invertible, neither of them has a column of zero. If we have $(g_0)_{i,1}neq 0, (h_0)_{k,1}neq 0$ for some $i,k$, then the above lemma implies that $i=1$. On the other hand, Since $g_0$ and $h_0$ are invertible, neither of them has a column of zero. Hence $g_0$ has the form$$g_0=left[begin{array}{cccc}
                      d_1 & ast & cdots & ast\
                      0 & ast & cdots & ast\
                      vdots & & vdots\
                      0 & ast & cdots & ast
                      end{array}right].$$

                      We then multiply a product $c_1$ of elementary matrices that corresponds to adding multiples of the first column to other columns, which is in $B$, to obtain an element $g_1:=g_0c_1$ of the form
                      $$g_{1}=left[begin{array}{cccc}
                      d_1 & 0 & cdots & 0\
                      0 & ast & cdots & ast\
                      vdots & & vdots\
                      0 & ast & cdots & ast
                      end{array}right].$$



                      The $(n-1)times (n-1)$ matrix $g_1'$ that is obtained by deleting the first row and the first column of $g_1$ is in $N(B_{n-1})$; thus by induction hypothesis, $g_1'in B_{n-1}$. It follows that $g_1in B_{n}$. Hence $N(B_{n})subset B_{n}$.The converse inclusion holds trivially.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$


















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        It can be shown by direct computation. First, we need the following lemma.






                        Lemma. Let $gin GL(n,F)$. Let $h:=g^{-1}$. If there are entries of $g$ and $h$ such that
                        $$g_{ij}neq 0,h_{kj}neq 0,i>j,kgeq j,$$
                        then $g$ is not in $N(B)$, the normalizer of $B$.




                        (Proof)Let $b=I+E_{jk}$, where $E_{jk}$ is the matrix whose entries are all zero except for the $(j,k)$-entry. Since $kgeq j$, $b$ is an element of $B$. Notice that $(gbg^{-1})_{ij}=(g)_{ij}(h)_{kj}neq 0$. So $gbg^{-1}$ is not upper triangular(, for $i>j$). Hence $gbg^{-1}not in B$. Therefore $gnot in N(B)$. $square$





                        Now we prove that $N(B)=B$ by induction on $n$.



                        Let us denote by $B_n$ the set of invertible upper triangular matrices of size n and by $N(B_n)$ its normalizer in $GL(n,F)$. Assuming that $N(B_{n-1})=B_{n-1}$, we prove $N(B_{n})=B_{n}$.



                        Suppose that $g_0in N(B)$. Let $h_0:=g_0^{-1}$. Since $g_0$ and $h_0$ are invertible, neither of them has a column of zero. If we have $(g_0)_{i,1}neq 0, (h_0)_{k,1}neq 0$ for some $i,k$, then the above lemma implies that $i=1$. On the other hand, Since $g_0$ and $h_0$ are invertible, neither of them has a column of zero. Hence $g_0$ has the form$$g_0=left[begin{array}{cccc}
                        d_1 & ast & cdots & ast\
                        0 & ast & cdots & ast\
                        vdots & & vdots\
                        0 & ast & cdots & ast
                        end{array}right].$$

                        We then multiply a product $c_1$ of elementary matrices that corresponds to adding multiples of the first column to other columns, which is in $B$, to obtain an element $g_1:=g_0c_1$ of the form
                        $$g_{1}=left[begin{array}{cccc}
                        d_1 & 0 & cdots & 0\
                        0 & ast & cdots & ast\
                        vdots & & vdots\
                        0 & ast & cdots & ast
                        end{array}right].$$



                        The $(n-1)times (n-1)$ matrix $g_1'$ that is obtained by deleting the first row and the first column of $g_1$ is in $N(B_{n-1})$; thus by induction hypothesis, $g_1'in B_{n-1}$. It follows that $g_1in B_{n}$. Hence $N(B_{n})subset B_{n}$.The converse inclusion holds trivially.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$
















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          It can be shown by direct computation. First, we need the following lemma.






                          Lemma. Let $gin GL(n,F)$. Let $h:=g^{-1}$. If there are entries of $g$ and $h$ such that
                          $$g_{ij}neq 0,h_{kj}neq 0,i>j,kgeq j,$$
                          then $g$ is not in $N(B)$, the normalizer of $B$.




                          (Proof)Let $b=I+E_{jk}$, where $E_{jk}$ is the matrix whose entries are all zero except for the $(j,k)$-entry. Since $kgeq j$, $b$ is an element of $B$. Notice that $(gbg^{-1})_{ij}=(g)_{ij}(h)_{kj}neq 0$. So $gbg^{-1}$ is not upper triangular(, for $i>j$). Hence $gbg^{-1}not in B$. Therefore $gnot in N(B)$. $square$





                          Now we prove that $N(B)=B$ by induction on $n$.



                          Let us denote by $B_n$ the set of invertible upper triangular matrices of size n and by $N(B_n)$ its normalizer in $GL(n,F)$. Assuming that $N(B_{n-1})=B_{n-1}$, we prove $N(B_{n})=B_{n}$.



                          Suppose that $g_0in N(B)$. Let $h_0:=g_0^{-1}$. Since $g_0$ and $h_0$ are invertible, neither of them has a column of zero. If we have $(g_0)_{i,1}neq 0, (h_0)_{k,1}neq 0$ for some $i,k$, then the above lemma implies that $i=1$. On the other hand, Since $g_0$ and $h_0$ are invertible, neither of them has a column of zero. Hence $g_0$ has the form$$g_0=left[begin{array}{cccc}
                          d_1 & ast & cdots & ast\
                          0 & ast & cdots & ast\
                          vdots & & vdots\
                          0 & ast & cdots & ast
                          end{array}right].$$

                          We then multiply a product $c_1$ of elementary matrices that corresponds to adding multiples of the first column to other columns, which is in $B$, to obtain an element $g_1:=g_0c_1$ of the form
                          $$g_{1}=left[begin{array}{cccc}
                          d_1 & 0 & cdots & 0\
                          0 & ast & cdots & ast\
                          vdots & & vdots\
                          0 & ast & cdots & ast
                          end{array}right].$$



                          The $(n-1)times (n-1)$ matrix $g_1'$ that is obtained by deleting the first row and the first column of $g_1$ is in $N(B_{n-1})$; thus by induction hypothesis, $g_1'in B_{n-1}$. It follows that $g_1in B_{n}$. Hence $N(B_{n})subset B_{n}$.The converse inclusion holds trivially.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          It can be shown by direct computation. First, we need the following lemma.






                          Lemma. Let $gin GL(n,F)$. Let $h:=g^{-1}$. If there are entries of $g$ and $h$ such that
                          $$g_{ij}neq 0,h_{kj}neq 0,i>j,kgeq j,$$
                          then $g$ is not in $N(B)$, the normalizer of $B$.




                          (Proof)Let $b=I+E_{jk}$, where $E_{jk}$ is the matrix whose entries are all zero except for the $(j,k)$-entry. Since $kgeq j$, $b$ is an element of $B$. Notice that $(gbg^{-1})_{ij}=(g)_{ij}(h)_{kj}neq 0$. So $gbg^{-1}$ is not upper triangular(, for $i>j$). Hence $gbg^{-1}not in B$. Therefore $gnot in N(B)$. $square$





                          Now we prove that $N(B)=B$ by induction on $n$.



                          Let us denote by $B_n$ the set of invertible upper triangular matrices of size n and by $N(B_n)$ its normalizer in $GL(n,F)$. Assuming that $N(B_{n-1})=B_{n-1}$, we prove $N(B_{n})=B_{n}$.



                          Suppose that $g_0in N(B)$. Let $h_0:=g_0^{-1}$. Since $g_0$ and $h_0$ are invertible, neither of them has a column of zero. If we have $(g_0)_{i,1}neq 0, (h_0)_{k,1}neq 0$ for some $i,k$, then the above lemma implies that $i=1$. On the other hand, Since $g_0$ and $h_0$ are invertible, neither of them has a column of zero. Hence $g_0$ has the form$$g_0=left[begin{array}{cccc}
                          d_1 & ast & cdots & ast\
                          0 & ast & cdots & ast\
                          vdots & & vdots\
                          0 & ast & cdots & ast
                          end{array}right].$$

                          We then multiply a product $c_1$ of elementary matrices that corresponds to adding multiples of the first column to other columns, which is in $B$, to obtain an element $g_1:=g_0c_1$ of the form
                          $$g_{1}=left[begin{array}{cccc}
                          d_1 & 0 & cdots & 0\
                          0 & ast & cdots & ast\
                          vdots & & vdots\
                          0 & ast & cdots & ast
                          end{array}right].$$



                          The $(n-1)times (n-1)$ matrix $g_1'$ that is obtained by deleting the first row and the first column of $g_1$ is in $N(B_{n-1})$; thus by induction hypothesis, $g_1'in B_{n-1}$. It follows that $g_1in B_{n}$. Hence $N(B_{n})subset B_{n}$.The converse inclusion holds trivially.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Jan 3 at 10:12

























                          answered Jan 1 at 8:24









                          KenKen

                          186110




                          186110






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2087062%2fnormalizer-of-upper-triangular-group-in-rm-gln-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                              Aardman Animations

                              Are they similar matrix