Inline Feynman diagrams, Feynman diagrams in equations, very small Feynman diagrams












12















I'd like to typeset equations like:
Inline Feynman diagrams 1Inline Feynman diagrams 2



I have tried this with the tikz-feynman library, but the diagrams generated by it are just way too large, even with the small option (and also just look awkward). Optimally, I want to type simple diagrams even inline with the text, so that I can avoid awkwardly describing the diagram or using a lot of space and breaking the flow of the document to display the diagram.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Welcome to TeX.SE. I like very much your question. Good LaTeX.

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 10:44






  • 1





    Using normal inline TikZ by tikz may be a solution.

    – JouleV
    Feb 23 at 10:55
















12















I'd like to typeset equations like:
Inline Feynman diagrams 1Inline Feynman diagrams 2



I have tried this with the tikz-feynman library, but the diagrams generated by it are just way too large, even with the small option (and also just look awkward). Optimally, I want to type simple diagrams even inline with the text, so that I can avoid awkwardly describing the diagram or using a lot of space and breaking the flow of the document to display the diagram.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Welcome to TeX.SE. I like very much your question. Good LaTeX.

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 10:44






  • 1





    Using normal inline TikZ by tikz may be a solution.

    – JouleV
    Feb 23 at 10:55














12












12








12


3






I'd like to typeset equations like:
Inline Feynman diagrams 1Inline Feynman diagrams 2



I have tried this with the tikz-feynman library, but the diagrams generated by it are just way too large, even with the small option (and also just look awkward). Optimally, I want to type simple diagrams even inline with the text, so that I can avoid awkwardly describing the diagram or using a lot of space and breaking the flow of the document to display the diagram.










share|improve this question














I'd like to typeset equations like:
Inline Feynman diagrams 1Inline Feynman diagrams 2



I have tried this with the tikz-feynman library, but the diagrams generated by it are just way too large, even with the small option (and also just look awkward). Optimally, I want to type simple diagrams even inline with the text, so that I can avoid awkwardly describing the diagram or using a lot of space and breaking the flow of the document to display the diagram.







inline feynman






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 23 at 10:40









LeonardLeonard

634




634








  • 1





    Welcome to TeX.SE. I like very much your question. Good LaTeX.

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 10:44






  • 1





    Using normal inline TikZ by tikz may be a solution.

    – JouleV
    Feb 23 at 10:55














  • 1





    Welcome to TeX.SE. I like very much your question. Good LaTeX.

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 10:44






  • 1





    Using normal inline TikZ by tikz may be a solution.

    – JouleV
    Feb 23 at 10:55








1




1





Welcome to TeX.SE. I like very much your question. Good LaTeX.

– Sebastiano
Feb 23 at 10:44





Welcome to TeX.SE. I like very much your question. Good LaTeX.

– Sebastiano
Feb 23 at 10:44




1




1





Using normal inline TikZ by tikz may be a solution.

– JouleV
Feb 23 at 10:55





Using normal inline TikZ by tikz may be a solution.

– JouleV
Feb 23 at 10:55










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















15














AFAIK you do not get bent arrows with tikz-feynman. And since you seem not to need the graph drawing algorithms (and since they cannot be uploaded to the arXv), you may just work with plain TikZ.



documentclass[fleqn]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathrsfs}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,bending,decorations.markings}
% from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/430239/121799
tikzset{% inspired by https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/316050/121799
arc arrow/.style args={%
to pos #1 with length #2}{
decoration={
markings,
mark=at position 0 with {pgfextra{%
pgfmathsetmacro{tmpArrowTime}{#2/(pgfdecoratedpathlength)}
xdeftmpArrowTime{tmpArrowTime}}},
mark=at position {#1-tmpArrowTime} with {coordinate(@1);},
mark=at position {#1-2*tmpArrowTime/3} with {coordinate(@2);},
mark=at position {#1-tmpArrowTime/3} with {coordinate(@3);},
mark=at position {#1} with {coordinate(@4);
draw[-{Triangle[length=#2,bend]}]
(@1) .. controls (@2) and (@3) .. (@4);},
},
postaction=decorate,
},
fermion arc arrow/.style={arc arrow=to pos #1 with length 2.5mm},
Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},
insert vertex/.style={decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {node[Vertex]{};},
},
postaction=decorate}
}
DeclareMathOperator{tr}{tr}
begin{document}

[mathscr{P}(varphi)=-sumlimits_{n=1}^inftytrleft(Delta L_{12}right)^n
=vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex=0,fermion arc arrow={0.55}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}+frac{1}{2}
vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex/.list={0,0.5}](0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
draw[fermion arc arrow/.list={0.3,0.8}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}
+frac{1}{3}
vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex/.list={0,1/3,2/3}](0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
draw[fermion arc arrow/.list={0.21,0.55,0.88}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}+dots;.
]

[
G(x_1,dots x_n)=sumlimits_{m=0}^inftyfrac{1}{m!}
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(X.base)}]
node[circle,draw,thick,inner sep=2pt] (X) at (0,0) {$n+m$};
foreach X in {60,90,120}
{draw[thick] (X:0.6) -- (X:0.9) node[Vertex]{};}
foreach X in {-60,-80,-100,-120}
{draw[thick] (X:0.6) -- (X:0.9);}
node[rotate=-30,overlay] at (-120:1.1){$x_1$};
node[rotate=30,overlay] at (-60:1.1){$x_n$};
node at (-90:1.1){$cdots$};
end{tikzpicture}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Excuse me very much for this opinion. Can you reduce the size of the three circles? Perhaps the image of the series is more beautiful to see. PS: But what is the matter of this argument in Physics?

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 22:11








  • 1





    @Sebastiano You can control the appearance by adjusting Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},. I do not know what this diagram is. If the propagators were dashed, there would be a resemblance to the loops that one has to compute for the Coleman-Weinberg potential.

    – marmot
    Feb 23 at 22:15











  • I like very much your work. I not known the Coleman-Weinberg potential. Thank you very much. It will be between my favorities.

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 22:17








  • 1





    @Sebastiano To the best of my knowledge the term "dimensional transmutation" has been coined in the paper by Coleman and (Eric) Weinberg. It is a rather important observation. Whether or not the above has anything to do with it I do not know.

    – marmot
    Feb 23 at 22:22






  • 1





    @Sebastiano The second equation is just expressing the greenfunctions of a QFT in terms of a sum over all diagrams. The first is an intermediate step in a proof about the signs of feynman diagrams with fermionic fields. Both are taken from the excellent book "Functional methods in quantum field theory and statistical physics" by Vasiliev.

    – Leonard
    Feb 24 at 13:03











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476304%2finline-feynman-diagrams-feynman-diagrams-in-equations-very-small-feynman-diagr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









15














AFAIK you do not get bent arrows with tikz-feynman. And since you seem not to need the graph drawing algorithms (and since they cannot be uploaded to the arXv), you may just work with plain TikZ.



documentclass[fleqn]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathrsfs}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,bending,decorations.markings}
% from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/430239/121799
tikzset{% inspired by https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/316050/121799
arc arrow/.style args={%
to pos #1 with length #2}{
decoration={
markings,
mark=at position 0 with {pgfextra{%
pgfmathsetmacro{tmpArrowTime}{#2/(pgfdecoratedpathlength)}
xdeftmpArrowTime{tmpArrowTime}}},
mark=at position {#1-tmpArrowTime} with {coordinate(@1);},
mark=at position {#1-2*tmpArrowTime/3} with {coordinate(@2);},
mark=at position {#1-tmpArrowTime/3} with {coordinate(@3);},
mark=at position {#1} with {coordinate(@4);
draw[-{Triangle[length=#2,bend]}]
(@1) .. controls (@2) and (@3) .. (@4);},
},
postaction=decorate,
},
fermion arc arrow/.style={arc arrow=to pos #1 with length 2.5mm},
Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},
insert vertex/.style={decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {node[Vertex]{};},
},
postaction=decorate}
}
DeclareMathOperator{tr}{tr}
begin{document}

[mathscr{P}(varphi)=-sumlimits_{n=1}^inftytrleft(Delta L_{12}right)^n
=vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex=0,fermion arc arrow={0.55}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}+frac{1}{2}
vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex/.list={0,0.5}](0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
draw[fermion arc arrow/.list={0.3,0.8}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}
+frac{1}{3}
vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex/.list={0,1/3,2/3}](0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
draw[fermion arc arrow/.list={0.21,0.55,0.88}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}+dots;.
]

[
G(x_1,dots x_n)=sumlimits_{m=0}^inftyfrac{1}{m!}
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(X.base)}]
node[circle,draw,thick,inner sep=2pt] (X) at (0,0) {$n+m$};
foreach X in {60,90,120}
{draw[thick] (X:0.6) -- (X:0.9) node[Vertex]{};}
foreach X in {-60,-80,-100,-120}
{draw[thick] (X:0.6) -- (X:0.9);}
node[rotate=-30,overlay] at (-120:1.1){$x_1$};
node[rotate=30,overlay] at (-60:1.1){$x_n$};
node at (-90:1.1){$cdots$};
end{tikzpicture}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Excuse me very much for this opinion. Can you reduce the size of the three circles? Perhaps the image of the series is more beautiful to see. PS: But what is the matter of this argument in Physics?

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 22:11








  • 1





    @Sebastiano You can control the appearance by adjusting Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},. I do not know what this diagram is. If the propagators were dashed, there would be a resemblance to the loops that one has to compute for the Coleman-Weinberg potential.

    – marmot
    Feb 23 at 22:15











  • I like very much your work. I not known the Coleman-Weinberg potential. Thank you very much. It will be between my favorities.

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 22:17








  • 1





    @Sebastiano To the best of my knowledge the term "dimensional transmutation" has been coined in the paper by Coleman and (Eric) Weinberg. It is a rather important observation. Whether or not the above has anything to do with it I do not know.

    – marmot
    Feb 23 at 22:22






  • 1





    @Sebastiano The second equation is just expressing the greenfunctions of a QFT in terms of a sum over all diagrams. The first is an intermediate step in a proof about the signs of feynman diagrams with fermionic fields. Both are taken from the excellent book "Functional methods in quantum field theory and statistical physics" by Vasiliev.

    – Leonard
    Feb 24 at 13:03
















15














AFAIK you do not get bent arrows with tikz-feynman. And since you seem not to need the graph drawing algorithms (and since they cannot be uploaded to the arXv), you may just work with plain TikZ.



documentclass[fleqn]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathrsfs}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,bending,decorations.markings}
% from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/430239/121799
tikzset{% inspired by https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/316050/121799
arc arrow/.style args={%
to pos #1 with length #2}{
decoration={
markings,
mark=at position 0 with {pgfextra{%
pgfmathsetmacro{tmpArrowTime}{#2/(pgfdecoratedpathlength)}
xdeftmpArrowTime{tmpArrowTime}}},
mark=at position {#1-tmpArrowTime} with {coordinate(@1);},
mark=at position {#1-2*tmpArrowTime/3} with {coordinate(@2);},
mark=at position {#1-tmpArrowTime/3} with {coordinate(@3);},
mark=at position {#1} with {coordinate(@4);
draw[-{Triangle[length=#2,bend]}]
(@1) .. controls (@2) and (@3) .. (@4);},
},
postaction=decorate,
},
fermion arc arrow/.style={arc arrow=to pos #1 with length 2.5mm},
Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},
insert vertex/.style={decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {node[Vertex]{};},
},
postaction=decorate}
}
DeclareMathOperator{tr}{tr}
begin{document}

[mathscr{P}(varphi)=-sumlimits_{n=1}^inftytrleft(Delta L_{12}right)^n
=vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex=0,fermion arc arrow={0.55}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}+frac{1}{2}
vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex/.list={0,0.5}](0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
draw[fermion arc arrow/.list={0.3,0.8}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}
+frac{1}{3}
vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex/.list={0,1/3,2/3}](0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
draw[fermion arc arrow/.list={0.21,0.55,0.88}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}+dots;.
]

[
G(x_1,dots x_n)=sumlimits_{m=0}^inftyfrac{1}{m!}
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(X.base)}]
node[circle,draw,thick,inner sep=2pt] (X) at (0,0) {$n+m$};
foreach X in {60,90,120}
{draw[thick] (X:0.6) -- (X:0.9) node[Vertex]{};}
foreach X in {-60,-80,-100,-120}
{draw[thick] (X:0.6) -- (X:0.9);}
node[rotate=-30,overlay] at (-120:1.1){$x_1$};
node[rotate=30,overlay] at (-60:1.1){$x_n$};
node at (-90:1.1){$cdots$};
end{tikzpicture}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Excuse me very much for this opinion. Can you reduce the size of the three circles? Perhaps the image of the series is more beautiful to see. PS: But what is the matter of this argument in Physics?

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 22:11








  • 1





    @Sebastiano You can control the appearance by adjusting Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},. I do not know what this diagram is. If the propagators were dashed, there would be a resemblance to the loops that one has to compute for the Coleman-Weinberg potential.

    – marmot
    Feb 23 at 22:15











  • I like very much your work. I not known the Coleman-Weinberg potential. Thank you very much. It will be between my favorities.

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 22:17








  • 1





    @Sebastiano To the best of my knowledge the term "dimensional transmutation" has been coined in the paper by Coleman and (Eric) Weinberg. It is a rather important observation. Whether or not the above has anything to do with it I do not know.

    – marmot
    Feb 23 at 22:22






  • 1





    @Sebastiano The second equation is just expressing the greenfunctions of a QFT in terms of a sum over all diagrams. The first is an intermediate step in a proof about the signs of feynman diagrams with fermionic fields. Both are taken from the excellent book "Functional methods in quantum field theory and statistical physics" by Vasiliev.

    – Leonard
    Feb 24 at 13:03














15












15








15







AFAIK you do not get bent arrows with tikz-feynman. And since you seem not to need the graph drawing algorithms (and since they cannot be uploaded to the arXv), you may just work with plain TikZ.



documentclass[fleqn]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathrsfs}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,bending,decorations.markings}
% from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/430239/121799
tikzset{% inspired by https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/316050/121799
arc arrow/.style args={%
to pos #1 with length #2}{
decoration={
markings,
mark=at position 0 with {pgfextra{%
pgfmathsetmacro{tmpArrowTime}{#2/(pgfdecoratedpathlength)}
xdeftmpArrowTime{tmpArrowTime}}},
mark=at position {#1-tmpArrowTime} with {coordinate(@1);},
mark=at position {#1-2*tmpArrowTime/3} with {coordinate(@2);},
mark=at position {#1-tmpArrowTime/3} with {coordinate(@3);},
mark=at position {#1} with {coordinate(@4);
draw[-{Triangle[length=#2,bend]}]
(@1) .. controls (@2) and (@3) .. (@4);},
},
postaction=decorate,
},
fermion arc arrow/.style={arc arrow=to pos #1 with length 2.5mm},
Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},
insert vertex/.style={decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {node[Vertex]{};},
},
postaction=decorate}
}
DeclareMathOperator{tr}{tr}
begin{document}

[mathscr{P}(varphi)=-sumlimits_{n=1}^inftytrleft(Delta L_{12}right)^n
=vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex=0,fermion arc arrow={0.55}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}+frac{1}{2}
vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex/.list={0,0.5}](0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
draw[fermion arc arrow/.list={0.3,0.8}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}
+frac{1}{3}
vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex/.list={0,1/3,2/3}](0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
draw[fermion arc arrow/.list={0.21,0.55,0.88}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}+dots;.
]

[
G(x_1,dots x_n)=sumlimits_{m=0}^inftyfrac{1}{m!}
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(X.base)}]
node[circle,draw,thick,inner sep=2pt] (X) at (0,0) {$n+m$};
foreach X in {60,90,120}
{draw[thick] (X:0.6) -- (X:0.9) node[Vertex]{};}
foreach X in {-60,-80,-100,-120}
{draw[thick] (X:0.6) -- (X:0.9);}
node[rotate=-30,overlay] at (-120:1.1){$x_1$};
node[rotate=30,overlay] at (-60:1.1){$x_n$};
node at (-90:1.1){$cdots$};
end{tikzpicture}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















AFAIK you do not get bent arrows with tikz-feynman. And since you seem not to need the graph drawing algorithms (and since they cannot be uploaded to the arXv), you may just work with plain TikZ.



documentclass[fleqn]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathrsfs}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,bending,decorations.markings}
% from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/430239/121799
tikzset{% inspired by https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/316050/121799
arc arrow/.style args={%
to pos #1 with length #2}{
decoration={
markings,
mark=at position 0 with {pgfextra{%
pgfmathsetmacro{tmpArrowTime}{#2/(pgfdecoratedpathlength)}
xdeftmpArrowTime{tmpArrowTime}}},
mark=at position {#1-tmpArrowTime} with {coordinate(@1);},
mark=at position {#1-2*tmpArrowTime/3} with {coordinate(@2);},
mark=at position {#1-tmpArrowTime/3} with {coordinate(@3);},
mark=at position {#1} with {coordinate(@4);
draw[-{Triangle[length=#2,bend]}]
(@1) .. controls (@2) and (@3) .. (@4);},
},
postaction=decorate,
},
fermion arc arrow/.style={arc arrow=to pos #1 with length 2.5mm},
Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},
insert vertex/.style={decoration={
markings,
mark=at position #1 with {node[Vertex]{};},
},
postaction=decorate}
}
DeclareMathOperator{tr}{tr}
begin{document}

[mathscr{P}(varphi)=-sumlimits_{n=1}^inftytrleft(Delta L_{12}right)^n
=vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex=0,fermion arc arrow={0.55}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}+frac{1}{2}
vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex/.list={0,0.5}](0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
draw[fermion arc arrow/.list={0.3,0.8}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}
+frac{1}{3}
vcenter{hbox{begin{tikzpicture}
draw[thick,insert vertex/.list={0,1/3,2/3}](0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
draw[fermion arc arrow/.list={0.21,0.55,0.88}] (0,0) arc(270:-90:0.6);
end{tikzpicture}}}+dots;.
]

[
G(x_1,dots x_n)=sumlimits_{m=0}^inftyfrac{1}{m!}
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(X.base)}]
node[circle,draw,thick,inner sep=2pt] (X) at (0,0) {$n+m$};
foreach X in {60,90,120}
{draw[thick] (X:0.6) -- (X:0.9) node[Vertex]{};}
foreach X in {-60,-80,-100,-120}
{draw[thick] (X:0.6) -- (X:0.9);}
node[rotate=-30,overlay] at (-120:1.1){$x_1$};
node[rotate=30,overlay] at (-60:1.1){$x_n$};
node at (-90:1.1){$cdots$};
end{tikzpicture}
]
end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 23 at 15:27

























answered Feb 23 at 13:11









marmotmarmot

112k5143268




112k5143268













  • Excuse me very much for this opinion. Can you reduce the size of the three circles? Perhaps the image of the series is more beautiful to see. PS: But what is the matter of this argument in Physics?

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 22:11








  • 1





    @Sebastiano You can control the appearance by adjusting Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},. I do not know what this diagram is. If the propagators were dashed, there would be a resemblance to the loops that one has to compute for the Coleman-Weinberg potential.

    – marmot
    Feb 23 at 22:15











  • I like very much your work. I not known the Coleman-Weinberg potential. Thank you very much. It will be between my favorities.

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 22:17








  • 1





    @Sebastiano To the best of my knowledge the term "dimensional transmutation" has been coined in the paper by Coleman and (Eric) Weinberg. It is a rather important observation. Whether or not the above has anything to do with it I do not know.

    – marmot
    Feb 23 at 22:22






  • 1





    @Sebastiano The second equation is just expressing the greenfunctions of a QFT in terms of a sum over all diagrams. The first is an intermediate step in a proof about the signs of feynman diagrams with fermionic fields. Both are taken from the excellent book "Functional methods in quantum field theory and statistical physics" by Vasiliev.

    – Leonard
    Feb 24 at 13:03



















  • Excuse me very much for this opinion. Can you reduce the size of the three circles? Perhaps the image of the series is more beautiful to see. PS: But what is the matter of this argument in Physics?

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 22:11








  • 1





    @Sebastiano You can control the appearance by adjusting Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},. I do not know what this diagram is. If the propagators were dashed, there would be a resemblance to the loops that one has to compute for the Coleman-Weinberg potential.

    – marmot
    Feb 23 at 22:15











  • I like very much your work. I not known the Coleman-Weinberg potential. Thank you very much. It will be between my favorities.

    – Sebastiano
    Feb 23 at 22:17








  • 1





    @Sebastiano To the best of my knowledge the term "dimensional transmutation" has been coined in the paper by Coleman and (Eric) Weinberg. It is a rather important observation. Whether or not the above has anything to do with it I do not know.

    – marmot
    Feb 23 at 22:22






  • 1





    @Sebastiano The second equation is just expressing the greenfunctions of a QFT in terms of a sum over all diagrams. The first is an intermediate step in a proof about the signs of feynman diagrams with fermionic fields. Both are taken from the excellent book "Functional methods in quantum field theory and statistical physics" by Vasiliev.

    – Leonard
    Feb 24 at 13:03

















Excuse me very much for this opinion. Can you reduce the size of the three circles? Perhaps the image of the series is more beautiful to see. PS: But what is the matter of this argument in Physics?

– Sebastiano
Feb 23 at 22:11







Excuse me very much for this opinion. Can you reduce the size of the three circles? Perhaps the image of the series is more beautiful to see. PS: But what is the matter of this argument in Physics?

– Sebastiano
Feb 23 at 22:11






1




1





@Sebastiano You can control the appearance by adjusting Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},. I do not know what this diagram is. If the propagators were dashed, there would be a resemblance to the loops that one has to compute for the Coleman-Weinberg potential.

– marmot
Feb 23 at 22:15





@Sebastiano You can control the appearance by adjusting Vertex/.style={fill,circle,inner sep=1.5pt},. I do not know what this diagram is. If the propagators were dashed, there would be a resemblance to the loops that one has to compute for the Coleman-Weinberg potential.

– marmot
Feb 23 at 22:15













I like very much your work. I not known the Coleman-Weinberg potential. Thank you very much. It will be between my favorities.

– Sebastiano
Feb 23 at 22:17







I like very much your work. I not known the Coleman-Weinberg potential. Thank you very much. It will be between my favorities.

– Sebastiano
Feb 23 at 22:17






1




1





@Sebastiano To the best of my knowledge the term "dimensional transmutation" has been coined in the paper by Coleman and (Eric) Weinberg. It is a rather important observation. Whether or not the above has anything to do with it I do not know.

– marmot
Feb 23 at 22:22





@Sebastiano To the best of my knowledge the term "dimensional transmutation" has been coined in the paper by Coleman and (Eric) Weinberg. It is a rather important observation. Whether or not the above has anything to do with it I do not know.

– marmot
Feb 23 at 22:22




1




1





@Sebastiano The second equation is just expressing the greenfunctions of a QFT in terms of a sum over all diagrams. The first is an intermediate step in a proof about the signs of feynman diagrams with fermionic fields. Both are taken from the excellent book "Functional methods in quantum field theory and statistical physics" by Vasiliev.

– Leonard
Feb 24 at 13:03





@Sebastiano The second equation is just expressing the greenfunctions of a QFT in terms of a sum over all diagrams. The first is an intermediate step in a proof about the signs of feynman diagrams with fermionic fields. Both are taken from the excellent book "Functional methods in quantum field theory and statistical physics" by Vasiliev.

– Leonard
Feb 24 at 13:03


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476304%2finline-feynman-diagrams-feynman-diagrams-in-equations-very-small-feynman-diagr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

When does type information flow backwards in C++?

Grease: Live!