$F_k(a_1,b_1,c_1;a_2,b_2,c_2)=int_0^kfrac{a_1x^2+b_1x+c_1}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$
$begingroup$
I would like to know a general closed form for
$$J=F_k(a_1,b_1,c_1;a_2,b_2,c_2)=int_0^kfrac{a_1x^2+b_1x+c_1}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
Where $k>0$, $4a_1c_1-b_1^2<0$, and $4a_2c_2-b_2^2<0$. I encounter forms of the integral all the time and I thought it would be beneficial to finally put that to rest. I already know that
$$I_k(a,b,c)=int_0^kfrac{mathrm{d}x}{ax^2+bx+c}=frac1gbigg[arctanbigg(frac{2ak+b}gbigg)-arctanbigg(frac bgbigg)bigg]$$
where $g=sqrt{4ac-b^2}$
Hence we have that $$J=a_1int_0^kfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x+b_1int_0^kfrac{x}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x+c_1I_k(a_2,b_2,c_2)$$
So really one must focus on the integrals
$$H=int_0^kfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
$$W=int_0^kfrac{x}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
They don't seem especially hard, but I just keep getting lost in the algebra with the constants. Could I have a bit of help? Thanks.
integration closed-form
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I would like to know a general closed form for
$$J=F_k(a_1,b_1,c_1;a_2,b_2,c_2)=int_0^kfrac{a_1x^2+b_1x+c_1}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
Where $k>0$, $4a_1c_1-b_1^2<0$, and $4a_2c_2-b_2^2<0$. I encounter forms of the integral all the time and I thought it would be beneficial to finally put that to rest. I already know that
$$I_k(a,b,c)=int_0^kfrac{mathrm{d}x}{ax^2+bx+c}=frac1gbigg[arctanbigg(frac{2ak+b}gbigg)-arctanbigg(frac bgbigg)bigg]$$
where $g=sqrt{4ac-b^2}$
Hence we have that $$J=a_1int_0^kfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x+b_1int_0^kfrac{x}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x+c_1I_k(a_2,b_2,c_2)$$
So really one must focus on the integrals
$$H=int_0^kfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
$$W=int_0^kfrac{x}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
They don't seem especially hard, but I just keep getting lost in the algebra with the constants. Could I have a bit of help? Thanks.
integration closed-form
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is an interesting notation. Why do you choose to have $k$ as a subscript to $F$? (usually, these kind of subscripts denote "different functions" and not the main argument of the function)
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:27
$begingroup$
@Fabian Purely an aesthetic choice.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 4:28
1
$begingroup$
WA is your friend... Just take the result of the antiderivative and insert the boundaries by hand.
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:30
$begingroup$
Do you mean $b_i^2 - 4 a_i c_i < 0$?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 1 at 5:26
$begingroup$
@Travis yes I did
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 7:45
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I would like to know a general closed form for
$$J=F_k(a_1,b_1,c_1;a_2,b_2,c_2)=int_0^kfrac{a_1x^2+b_1x+c_1}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
Where $k>0$, $4a_1c_1-b_1^2<0$, and $4a_2c_2-b_2^2<0$. I encounter forms of the integral all the time and I thought it would be beneficial to finally put that to rest. I already know that
$$I_k(a,b,c)=int_0^kfrac{mathrm{d}x}{ax^2+bx+c}=frac1gbigg[arctanbigg(frac{2ak+b}gbigg)-arctanbigg(frac bgbigg)bigg]$$
where $g=sqrt{4ac-b^2}$
Hence we have that $$J=a_1int_0^kfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x+b_1int_0^kfrac{x}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x+c_1I_k(a_2,b_2,c_2)$$
So really one must focus on the integrals
$$H=int_0^kfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
$$W=int_0^kfrac{x}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
They don't seem especially hard, but I just keep getting lost in the algebra with the constants. Could I have a bit of help? Thanks.
integration closed-form
$endgroup$
I would like to know a general closed form for
$$J=F_k(a_1,b_1,c_1;a_2,b_2,c_2)=int_0^kfrac{a_1x^2+b_1x+c_1}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
Where $k>0$, $4a_1c_1-b_1^2<0$, and $4a_2c_2-b_2^2<0$. I encounter forms of the integral all the time and I thought it would be beneficial to finally put that to rest. I already know that
$$I_k(a,b,c)=int_0^kfrac{mathrm{d}x}{ax^2+bx+c}=frac1gbigg[arctanbigg(frac{2ak+b}gbigg)-arctanbigg(frac bgbigg)bigg]$$
where $g=sqrt{4ac-b^2}$
Hence we have that $$J=a_1int_0^kfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x+b_1int_0^kfrac{x}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x+c_1I_k(a_2,b_2,c_2)$$
So really one must focus on the integrals
$$H=int_0^kfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
$$W=int_0^kfrac{x}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}mathrm{d}x$$
They don't seem especially hard, but I just keep getting lost in the algebra with the constants. Could I have a bit of help? Thanks.
integration closed-form
integration closed-form
edited Jan 10 at 1:21
clathratus
asked Jan 1 at 4:22
clathratusclathratus
4,9641438
4,9641438
$begingroup$
This is an interesting notation. Why do you choose to have $k$ as a subscript to $F$? (usually, these kind of subscripts denote "different functions" and not the main argument of the function)
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:27
$begingroup$
@Fabian Purely an aesthetic choice.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 4:28
1
$begingroup$
WA is your friend... Just take the result of the antiderivative and insert the boundaries by hand.
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:30
$begingroup$
Do you mean $b_i^2 - 4 a_i c_i < 0$?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 1 at 5:26
$begingroup$
@Travis yes I did
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 7:45
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
This is an interesting notation. Why do you choose to have $k$ as a subscript to $F$? (usually, these kind of subscripts denote "different functions" and not the main argument of the function)
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:27
$begingroup$
@Fabian Purely an aesthetic choice.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 4:28
1
$begingroup$
WA is your friend... Just take the result of the antiderivative and insert the boundaries by hand.
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:30
$begingroup$
Do you mean $b_i^2 - 4 a_i c_i < 0$?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 1 at 5:26
$begingroup$
@Travis yes I did
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 7:45
$begingroup$
This is an interesting notation. Why do you choose to have $k$ as a subscript to $F$? (usually, these kind of subscripts denote "different functions" and not the main argument of the function)
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:27
$begingroup$
This is an interesting notation. Why do you choose to have $k$ as a subscript to $F$? (usually, these kind of subscripts denote "different functions" and not the main argument of the function)
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:27
$begingroup$
@Fabian Purely an aesthetic choice.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 4:28
$begingroup$
@Fabian Purely an aesthetic choice.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 4:28
1
1
$begingroup$
WA is your friend... Just take the result of the antiderivative and insert the boundaries by hand.
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:30
$begingroup$
WA is your friend... Just take the result of the antiderivative and insert the boundaries by hand.
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:30
$begingroup$
Do you mean $b_i^2 - 4 a_i c_i < 0$?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 1 at 5:26
$begingroup$
Do you mean $b_i^2 - 4 a_i c_i < 0$?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 1 at 5:26
$begingroup$
@Travis yes I did
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 7:45
$begingroup$
@Travis yes I did
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 7:45
|
show 3 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
While it's natural to compute the integrals $$int_0^k frac{x^n ,dx}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2},$$
it's somewhat more efficient to decompose the integral in a different way. (Herein we suppose $a_2 neq 0$; the case $a_2 = 0$ is easier.)
Notice that we can write the numerator of the integrand as
$$frac{a_1}{a_2}(a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2) + B x + C$$
for some constants $B, C$ (that we can write explicitly in terms of the $a_i, b_i, c_i$), so we can write the integral as
$$int_0^k frac{a_1 x^2 + b_1 x + c_1}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx
= k cdot frac{a_1}{a_2} + color{#df0000}{int_0^k frac{B x + C}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx} .$$
Now, with a view toward applying the substitution $$u = a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2, qquad du = 2 a_2 x + b_2 ,$$
we can write the numerator of the second integrand as $$B x + C = frac{B}{2 a_2} (2 a_2 x + b_2) + D$$
for some constant $D$ (that again we can write explicitly). So, the integral on the right-hand side is
$$color{#df0000}{int_0^k frac{B x + C}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx} = frac{B}{2 a_2} int_0^k frac{2 a_2 x + b_2}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c} dx + D int_0^k frac{dx}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} .$$ Rewriting the first term on the r.h.s. with the above substitution gives
$$frac{B}{2 a_2} int_{c_2}^{a_2 k^2 + b_2 k + c_2} frac{du}{u},$$ and the second integral on the r.h.s. is the quantity you denoted $I_k(a, b, c)$, for which you've already found an expression.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks. This is a really neat (and efficient!) approach.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 10 at 1:32
$begingroup$
You're welcome. If you just treat the integrals $int frac{x^k ,dx}{a x^2 + b x + c}$ directly you'll find that you have to do the computations that come up in the method in my answer anyway, but some you'll have to do more than once. The method in the answer just decomposes the numerator in a way such that you only have to deal with each type of manipulation exactly once.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 10 at 2:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a fairly
simple-minded first step.
$begin{array}\
H
&=int_0^kdfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kdfrac{x^2}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kdfrac{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*-(b^*_2x+c_2^*)}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kleft(1-dfrac{b^*_2x+c_2^*}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}left(k-int_0^kleft(dfrac{b^*_2x}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dx-int_0^kleft(dfrac{c_2^*}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dxright)\
end{array}
$
So $H$ reduces to
the other two,
one of which you know.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The process should work the same way with the integral you call $I$. Pull out $a$ in the denominator, complete the square, substitute $u = x + b/2a$, pull out $(4ac-b^{2})/4a^{2}$ from denominator and substitute $y = 2au/sqrt{4ac-b^{2}}$), and then you should arrive at three elementary integrals
$$ intfrac{x^{2},mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1} quadquad intfrac{x,mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1} quadquad intfrac{mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1}.$$
As a result of the first substitution, you should have all three of the integrals above to evaluate for integral $H$, and two of them for integral $W$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058217%2ff-ka-1-b-1-c-1a-2-b-2-c-2-int-0k-fraca-1x2b-1xc-1a-2x2b-2xc-2-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
While it's natural to compute the integrals $$int_0^k frac{x^n ,dx}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2},$$
it's somewhat more efficient to decompose the integral in a different way. (Herein we suppose $a_2 neq 0$; the case $a_2 = 0$ is easier.)
Notice that we can write the numerator of the integrand as
$$frac{a_1}{a_2}(a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2) + B x + C$$
for some constants $B, C$ (that we can write explicitly in terms of the $a_i, b_i, c_i$), so we can write the integral as
$$int_0^k frac{a_1 x^2 + b_1 x + c_1}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx
= k cdot frac{a_1}{a_2} + color{#df0000}{int_0^k frac{B x + C}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx} .$$
Now, with a view toward applying the substitution $$u = a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2, qquad du = 2 a_2 x + b_2 ,$$
we can write the numerator of the second integrand as $$B x + C = frac{B}{2 a_2} (2 a_2 x + b_2) + D$$
for some constant $D$ (that again we can write explicitly). So, the integral on the right-hand side is
$$color{#df0000}{int_0^k frac{B x + C}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx} = frac{B}{2 a_2} int_0^k frac{2 a_2 x + b_2}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c} dx + D int_0^k frac{dx}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} .$$ Rewriting the first term on the r.h.s. with the above substitution gives
$$frac{B}{2 a_2} int_{c_2}^{a_2 k^2 + b_2 k + c_2} frac{du}{u},$$ and the second integral on the r.h.s. is the quantity you denoted $I_k(a, b, c)$, for which you've already found an expression.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks. This is a really neat (and efficient!) approach.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 10 at 1:32
$begingroup$
You're welcome. If you just treat the integrals $int frac{x^k ,dx}{a x^2 + b x + c}$ directly you'll find that you have to do the computations that come up in the method in my answer anyway, but some you'll have to do more than once. The method in the answer just decomposes the numerator in a way such that you only have to deal with each type of manipulation exactly once.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 10 at 2:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While it's natural to compute the integrals $$int_0^k frac{x^n ,dx}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2},$$
it's somewhat more efficient to decompose the integral in a different way. (Herein we suppose $a_2 neq 0$; the case $a_2 = 0$ is easier.)
Notice that we can write the numerator of the integrand as
$$frac{a_1}{a_2}(a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2) + B x + C$$
for some constants $B, C$ (that we can write explicitly in terms of the $a_i, b_i, c_i$), so we can write the integral as
$$int_0^k frac{a_1 x^2 + b_1 x + c_1}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx
= k cdot frac{a_1}{a_2} + color{#df0000}{int_0^k frac{B x + C}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx} .$$
Now, with a view toward applying the substitution $$u = a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2, qquad du = 2 a_2 x + b_2 ,$$
we can write the numerator of the second integrand as $$B x + C = frac{B}{2 a_2} (2 a_2 x + b_2) + D$$
for some constant $D$ (that again we can write explicitly). So, the integral on the right-hand side is
$$color{#df0000}{int_0^k frac{B x + C}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx} = frac{B}{2 a_2} int_0^k frac{2 a_2 x + b_2}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c} dx + D int_0^k frac{dx}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} .$$ Rewriting the first term on the r.h.s. with the above substitution gives
$$frac{B}{2 a_2} int_{c_2}^{a_2 k^2 + b_2 k + c_2} frac{du}{u},$$ and the second integral on the r.h.s. is the quantity you denoted $I_k(a, b, c)$, for which you've already found an expression.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks. This is a really neat (and efficient!) approach.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 10 at 1:32
$begingroup$
You're welcome. If you just treat the integrals $int frac{x^k ,dx}{a x^2 + b x + c}$ directly you'll find that you have to do the computations that come up in the method in my answer anyway, but some you'll have to do more than once. The method in the answer just decomposes the numerator in a way such that you only have to deal with each type of manipulation exactly once.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 10 at 2:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While it's natural to compute the integrals $$int_0^k frac{x^n ,dx}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2},$$
it's somewhat more efficient to decompose the integral in a different way. (Herein we suppose $a_2 neq 0$; the case $a_2 = 0$ is easier.)
Notice that we can write the numerator of the integrand as
$$frac{a_1}{a_2}(a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2) + B x + C$$
for some constants $B, C$ (that we can write explicitly in terms of the $a_i, b_i, c_i$), so we can write the integral as
$$int_0^k frac{a_1 x^2 + b_1 x + c_1}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx
= k cdot frac{a_1}{a_2} + color{#df0000}{int_0^k frac{B x + C}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx} .$$
Now, with a view toward applying the substitution $$u = a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2, qquad du = 2 a_2 x + b_2 ,$$
we can write the numerator of the second integrand as $$B x + C = frac{B}{2 a_2} (2 a_2 x + b_2) + D$$
for some constant $D$ (that again we can write explicitly). So, the integral on the right-hand side is
$$color{#df0000}{int_0^k frac{B x + C}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx} = frac{B}{2 a_2} int_0^k frac{2 a_2 x + b_2}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c} dx + D int_0^k frac{dx}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} .$$ Rewriting the first term on the r.h.s. with the above substitution gives
$$frac{B}{2 a_2} int_{c_2}^{a_2 k^2 + b_2 k + c_2} frac{du}{u},$$ and the second integral on the r.h.s. is the quantity you denoted $I_k(a, b, c)$, for which you've already found an expression.
$endgroup$
While it's natural to compute the integrals $$int_0^k frac{x^n ,dx}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2},$$
it's somewhat more efficient to decompose the integral in a different way. (Herein we suppose $a_2 neq 0$; the case $a_2 = 0$ is easier.)
Notice that we can write the numerator of the integrand as
$$frac{a_1}{a_2}(a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2) + B x + C$$
for some constants $B, C$ (that we can write explicitly in terms of the $a_i, b_i, c_i$), so we can write the integral as
$$int_0^k frac{a_1 x^2 + b_1 x + c_1}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx
= k cdot frac{a_1}{a_2} + color{#df0000}{int_0^k frac{B x + C}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx} .$$
Now, with a view toward applying the substitution $$u = a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2, qquad du = 2 a_2 x + b_2 ,$$
we can write the numerator of the second integrand as $$B x + C = frac{B}{2 a_2} (2 a_2 x + b_2) + D$$
for some constant $D$ (that again we can write explicitly). So, the integral on the right-hand side is
$$color{#df0000}{int_0^k frac{B x + C}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} dx} = frac{B}{2 a_2} int_0^k frac{2 a_2 x + b_2}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c} dx + D int_0^k frac{dx}{a_2 x^2 + b_2 x + c_2} .$$ Rewriting the first term on the r.h.s. with the above substitution gives
$$frac{B}{2 a_2} int_{c_2}^{a_2 k^2 + b_2 k + c_2} frac{du}{u},$$ and the second integral on the r.h.s. is the quantity you denoted $I_k(a, b, c)$, for which you've already found an expression.
answered Jan 1 at 5:25
TravisTravis
63.8k769151
63.8k769151
$begingroup$
Thanks. This is a really neat (and efficient!) approach.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 10 at 1:32
$begingroup$
You're welcome. If you just treat the integrals $int frac{x^k ,dx}{a x^2 + b x + c}$ directly you'll find that you have to do the computations that come up in the method in my answer anyway, but some you'll have to do more than once. The method in the answer just decomposes the numerator in a way such that you only have to deal with each type of manipulation exactly once.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 10 at 2:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks. This is a really neat (and efficient!) approach.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 10 at 1:32
$begingroup$
You're welcome. If you just treat the integrals $int frac{x^k ,dx}{a x^2 + b x + c}$ directly you'll find that you have to do the computations that come up in the method in my answer anyway, but some you'll have to do more than once. The method in the answer just decomposes the numerator in a way such that you only have to deal with each type of manipulation exactly once.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 10 at 2:56
$begingroup$
Thanks. This is a really neat (and efficient!) approach.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 10 at 1:32
$begingroup$
Thanks. This is a really neat (and efficient!) approach.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 10 at 1:32
$begingroup$
You're welcome. If you just treat the integrals $int frac{x^k ,dx}{a x^2 + b x + c}$ directly you'll find that you have to do the computations that come up in the method in my answer anyway, but some you'll have to do more than once. The method in the answer just decomposes the numerator in a way such that you only have to deal with each type of manipulation exactly once.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 10 at 2:56
$begingroup$
You're welcome. If you just treat the integrals $int frac{x^k ,dx}{a x^2 + b x + c}$ directly you'll find that you have to do the computations that come up in the method in my answer anyway, but some you'll have to do more than once. The method in the answer just decomposes the numerator in a way such that you only have to deal with each type of manipulation exactly once.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 10 at 2:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a fairly
simple-minded first step.
$begin{array}\
H
&=int_0^kdfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kdfrac{x^2}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kdfrac{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*-(b^*_2x+c_2^*)}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kleft(1-dfrac{b^*_2x+c_2^*}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}left(k-int_0^kleft(dfrac{b^*_2x}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dx-int_0^kleft(dfrac{c_2^*}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dxright)\
end{array}
$
So $H$ reduces to
the other two,
one of which you know.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a fairly
simple-minded first step.
$begin{array}\
H
&=int_0^kdfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kdfrac{x^2}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kdfrac{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*-(b^*_2x+c_2^*)}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kleft(1-dfrac{b^*_2x+c_2^*}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}left(k-int_0^kleft(dfrac{b^*_2x}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dx-int_0^kleft(dfrac{c_2^*}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dxright)\
end{array}
$
So $H$ reduces to
the other two,
one of which you know.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a fairly
simple-minded first step.
$begin{array}\
H
&=int_0^kdfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kdfrac{x^2}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kdfrac{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*-(b^*_2x+c_2^*)}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kleft(1-dfrac{b^*_2x+c_2^*}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}left(k-int_0^kleft(dfrac{b^*_2x}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dx-int_0^kleft(dfrac{c_2^*}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dxright)\
end{array}
$
So $H$ reduces to
the other two,
one of which you know.
$endgroup$
Here is a fairly
simple-minded first step.
$begin{array}\
H
&=int_0^kdfrac{x^2}{a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kdfrac{x^2}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kdfrac{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*-(b^*_2x+c_2^*)}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}int_0^kleft(1-dfrac{b^*_2x+c_2^*}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dx\
&=dfrac1{a_2}left(k-int_0^kleft(dfrac{b^*_2x}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dx-int_0^kleft(dfrac{c_2^*}{x^2+b^*_2x+c_2^*}right)dxright)\
end{array}
$
So $H$ reduces to
the other two,
one of which you know.
answered Jan 1 at 5:10
marty cohenmarty cohen
74.8k549130
74.8k549130
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The process should work the same way with the integral you call $I$. Pull out $a$ in the denominator, complete the square, substitute $u = x + b/2a$, pull out $(4ac-b^{2})/4a^{2}$ from denominator and substitute $y = 2au/sqrt{4ac-b^{2}}$), and then you should arrive at three elementary integrals
$$ intfrac{x^{2},mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1} quadquad intfrac{x,mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1} quadquad intfrac{mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1}.$$
As a result of the first substitution, you should have all three of the integrals above to evaluate for integral $H$, and two of them for integral $W$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The process should work the same way with the integral you call $I$. Pull out $a$ in the denominator, complete the square, substitute $u = x + b/2a$, pull out $(4ac-b^{2})/4a^{2}$ from denominator and substitute $y = 2au/sqrt{4ac-b^{2}}$), and then you should arrive at three elementary integrals
$$ intfrac{x^{2},mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1} quadquad intfrac{x,mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1} quadquad intfrac{mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1}.$$
As a result of the first substitution, you should have all three of the integrals above to evaluate for integral $H$, and two of them for integral $W$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The process should work the same way with the integral you call $I$. Pull out $a$ in the denominator, complete the square, substitute $u = x + b/2a$, pull out $(4ac-b^{2})/4a^{2}$ from denominator and substitute $y = 2au/sqrt{4ac-b^{2}}$), and then you should arrive at three elementary integrals
$$ intfrac{x^{2},mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1} quadquad intfrac{x,mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1} quadquad intfrac{mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1}.$$
As a result of the first substitution, you should have all three of the integrals above to evaluate for integral $H$, and two of them for integral $W$.
$endgroup$
The process should work the same way with the integral you call $I$. Pull out $a$ in the denominator, complete the square, substitute $u = x + b/2a$, pull out $(4ac-b^{2})/4a^{2}$ from denominator and substitute $y = 2au/sqrt{4ac-b^{2}}$), and then you should arrive at three elementary integrals
$$ intfrac{x^{2},mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1} quadquad intfrac{x,mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1} quadquad intfrac{mathrm{d}x}{x^{2}+1}.$$
As a result of the first substitution, you should have all three of the integrals above to evaluate for integral $H$, and two of them for integral $W$.
edited Jan 1 at 5:15
answered Jan 1 at 5:06
IninterrompueIninterrompue
67519
67519
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058217%2ff-ka-1-b-1-c-1a-2-b-2-c-2-int-0k-fraca-1x2b-1xc-1a-2x2b-2xc-2-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This is an interesting notation. Why do you choose to have $k$ as a subscript to $F$? (usually, these kind of subscripts denote "different functions" and not the main argument of the function)
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:27
$begingroup$
@Fabian Purely an aesthetic choice.
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 4:28
1
$begingroup$
WA is your friend... Just take the result of the antiderivative and insert the boundaries by hand.
$endgroup$
– Fabian
Jan 1 at 4:30
$begingroup$
Do you mean $b_i^2 - 4 a_i c_i < 0$?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Jan 1 at 5:26
$begingroup$
@Travis yes I did
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 1 at 7:45