My job requires me to shuck oysters












4















I am not necessarily Buddhist but I am a vegan and killing doesn't sit well with me. I have suffered terrible sleep condition over the past 2 years and can't work in my field anymore and have no experience in any other field and have a hard time getting to work at an early time so midday work is best for me. Unfortunately the restaurant I work at currently has oysters for sale and they are alive when you prepare them which involves killing them. I don't know how to rationalize this but I am struggling financially and am working on getting a different restaurant job where they might not serve this dish. But I have killed some oysters already. How do I come to terms with this?










share|improve this question





























    4















    I am not necessarily Buddhist but I am a vegan and killing doesn't sit well with me. I have suffered terrible sleep condition over the past 2 years and can't work in my field anymore and have no experience in any other field and have a hard time getting to work at an early time so midday work is best for me. Unfortunately the restaurant I work at currently has oysters for sale and they are alive when you prepare them which involves killing them. I don't know how to rationalize this but I am struggling financially and am working on getting a different restaurant job where they might not serve this dish. But I have killed some oysters already. How do I come to terms with this?










    share|improve this question



























      4












      4








      4








      I am not necessarily Buddhist but I am a vegan and killing doesn't sit well with me. I have suffered terrible sleep condition over the past 2 years and can't work in my field anymore and have no experience in any other field and have a hard time getting to work at an early time so midday work is best for me. Unfortunately the restaurant I work at currently has oysters for sale and they are alive when you prepare them which involves killing them. I don't know how to rationalize this but I am struggling financially and am working on getting a different restaurant job where they might not serve this dish. But I have killed some oysters already. How do I come to terms with this?










      share|improve this question
















      I am not necessarily Buddhist but I am a vegan and killing doesn't sit well with me. I have suffered terrible sleep condition over the past 2 years and can't work in my field anymore and have no experience in any other field and have a hard time getting to work at an early time so midday work is best for me. Unfortunately the restaurant I work at currently has oysters for sale and they are alive when you prepare them which involves killing them. I don't know how to rationalize this but I am struggling financially and am working on getting a different restaurant job where they might not serve this dish. But I have killed some oysters already. How do I come to terms with this?







      karma killing






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Feb 24 at 9:24









      Glorfindel

      135119




      135119










      asked Feb 23 at 2:23









      NathanNathan

      211




      211






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          The Buddhist teachings do not exist for you to create suffering for yourself. Oysters are extremely primitive life forms. While they breathe oxygen, they are very close to plants. Oysters have a nervous system but not a brain. We practise non-killing as Buddhists so we cultivate a respect for life and cease to be violent people. If killing oysters (that don't suffer or don't have relatives or loved one's who suffer about them) is against your moral principles then find a new job. However, if you think deeply about what or who you have harmed, I don't think much will be found. Don't worry about it. Let it go. An oyster does not have a brother, sister, mother or father somewhere in the universe grieving about their lost relative oyster. The Buddha appeared to infer in SN 12.63 that lifeforms consuming other lifeforms is part of the cycle of life. As a "vegan", I imagine your views about food are more extreme than the average Buddhist. For example, the Buddha did not preach vegetarianism. The above said, personally, I would not like to kill oysters for a living.






          share|improve this answer

































            7














            According to the Bhikkhu Patimokkha (quoted below), which are rules for monks, killing a human is grounds for immediate and irreversible dismissal from the monastic order (parajika).



            However, deliberately killing an animal is an offense that requires only confession (pacittiya) within the monastic order, usually with the intention not to do it again. It's not as severe as killing a human.



            If possible, change jobs or avoid doing the task of killing oysters. This is because killing oysters involves generating the unwholesome deliberate intention of taking a life. It's against the five precepts and Right Livelihood.



            Also, don't carry remorse in your mind, which is unwholesome and unskillful. Confess it i.e. acknowledge that it's wrong then let it go. Don't hold on to it.




            Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is
            still a fetus — whether by killing the person, arranging for an
            assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to die, or describing
            the advantages of death — is a pārājika offense. (Pr 3)



            Pouring water that one knows to contain living beings — or having it
            poured — on grass or clay is a pācittiya offense. Pouring anything
            that would kill the beings into such water — or having it poured — is
            also a pācittiya offense. (Pc 20)



            Deliberately killing an animal — or having it killed — is a pācittiya
            offense. (Pc 61)



            Using water, or getting others to use it, knowing that it contains
            living beings that will die from that use, is a pācittiya offense. (Pc
            62)







            share|improve this answer

































              5














              Tell it your boss, simply "I observe the precept of not killing, not to encourage others and not to approve. It would be good if my person could take on tasks which do not involve such.", and simply abstain. Mental and future struggles from wrong doing are by far more hurtful and lasting then what ever hardship out of earn.



              Not out of causes the Buddha told that aside of killing, involvment in business with meat or living beings, does not fit well for someone after long time happiness. And what ever gain, of cource needs to have it's sacrifies: why not letting go of what hurts?



              [Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, but for release. For discussion and further question one is given to make use of this exit.]






              share|improve this answer


























              • I agree in principal with this as a possible action but would suggest that you think on changing the "Tell..." here to "Ask..."; and add, to the end, "Is there any way for you to accommodate me?" The employer might react better to this as a request for help but not react well if interpreted as a "demand". @Samana Johann if this was what you meant and was just a language issue with English, I apologize for misinterpreting. Regards.

                – GVCOJims
                Feb 28 at 20:01



















              1














              Since you're not necessarily a Buddhist, I'll try to answer from a more vegan point of view although I'm not a vegan. You can only come to terms with this by telling your boss your beliefs and stopping. You can't continue to uphold vegan beliefs and kill animals. I know your financial situation is at stake but you don't want to be a hipocrite. There is a gentlemen I supervise who we excuse from killing bugs which is a function of his job, that we excuse because of his spiritual beliefs.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Good on you for understanding this person's dilemma. Regards.

                – GVCOJims
                Feb 28 at 22:25













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "565"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31247%2fmy-job-requires-me-to-shuck-oysters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              9














              The Buddhist teachings do not exist for you to create suffering for yourself. Oysters are extremely primitive life forms. While they breathe oxygen, they are very close to plants. Oysters have a nervous system but not a brain. We practise non-killing as Buddhists so we cultivate a respect for life and cease to be violent people. If killing oysters (that don't suffer or don't have relatives or loved one's who suffer about them) is against your moral principles then find a new job. However, if you think deeply about what or who you have harmed, I don't think much will be found. Don't worry about it. Let it go. An oyster does not have a brother, sister, mother or father somewhere in the universe grieving about their lost relative oyster. The Buddha appeared to infer in SN 12.63 that lifeforms consuming other lifeforms is part of the cycle of life. As a "vegan", I imagine your views about food are more extreme than the average Buddhist. For example, the Buddha did not preach vegetarianism. The above said, personally, I would not like to kill oysters for a living.






              share|improve this answer






























                9














                The Buddhist teachings do not exist for you to create suffering for yourself. Oysters are extremely primitive life forms. While they breathe oxygen, they are very close to plants. Oysters have a nervous system but not a brain. We practise non-killing as Buddhists so we cultivate a respect for life and cease to be violent people. If killing oysters (that don't suffer or don't have relatives or loved one's who suffer about them) is against your moral principles then find a new job. However, if you think deeply about what or who you have harmed, I don't think much will be found. Don't worry about it. Let it go. An oyster does not have a brother, sister, mother or father somewhere in the universe grieving about their lost relative oyster. The Buddha appeared to infer in SN 12.63 that lifeforms consuming other lifeforms is part of the cycle of life. As a "vegan", I imagine your views about food are more extreme than the average Buddhist. For example, the Buddha did not preach vegetarianism. The above said, personally, I would not like to kill oysters for a living.






                share|improve this answer




























                  9












                  9








                  9







                  The Buddhist teachings do not exist for you to create suffering for yourself. Oysters are extremely primitive life forms. While they breathe oxygen, they are very close to plants. Oysters have a nervous system but not a brain. We practise non-killing as Buddhists so we cultivate a respect for life and cease to be violent people. If killing oysters (that don't suffer or don't have relatives or loved one's who suffer about them) is against your moral principles then find a new job. However, if you think deeply about what or who you have harmed, I don't think much will be found. Don't worry about it. Let it go. An oyster does not have a brother, sister, mother or father somewhere in the universe grieving about their lost relative oyster. The Buddha appeared to infer in SN 12.63 that lifeforms consuming other lifeforms is part of the cycle of life. As a "vegan", I imagine your views about food are more extreme than the average Buddhist. For example, the Buddha did not preach vegetarianism. The above said, personally, I would not like to kill oysters for a living.






                  share|improve this answer















                  The Buddhist teachings do not exist for you to create suffering for yourself. Oysters are extremely primitive life forms. While they breathe oxygen, they are very close to plants. Oysters have a nervous system but not a brain. We practise non-killing as Buddhists so we cultivate a respect for life and cease to be violent people. If killing oysters (that don't suffer or don't have relatives or loved one's who suffer about them) is against your moral principles then find a new job. However, if you think deeply about what or who you have harmed, I don't think much will be found. Don't worry about it. Let it go. An oyster does not have a brother, sister, mother or father somewhere in the universe grieving about their lost relative oyster. The Buddha appeared to infer in SN 12.63 that lifeforms consuming other lifeforms is part of the cycle of life. As a "vegan", I imagine your views about food are more extreme than the average Buddhist. For example, the Buddha did not preach vegetarianism. The above said, personally, I would not like to kill oysters for a living.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 23 at 7:22

























                  answered Feb 23 at 7:16









                  DhammadhatuDhammadhatu

                  25.7k11044




                  25.7k11044























                      7














                      According to the Bhikkhu Patimokkha (quoted below), which are rules for monks, killing a human is grounds for immediate and irreversible dismissal from the monastic order (parajika).



                      However, deliberately killing an animal is an offense that requires only confession (pacittiya) within the monastic order, usually with the intention not to do it again. It's not as severe as killing a human.



                      If possible, change jobs or avoid doing the task of killing oysters. This is because killing oysters involves generating the unwholesome deliberate intention of taking a life. It's against the five precepts and Right Livelihood.



                      Also, don't carry remorse in your mind, which is unwholesome and unskillful. Confess it i.e. acknowledge that it's wrong then let it go. Don't hold on to it.




                      Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is
                      still a fetus — whether by killing the person, arranging for an
                      assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to die, or describing
                      the advantages of death — is a pārājika offense. (Pr 3)



                      Pouring water that one knows to contain living beings — or having it
                      poured — on grass or clay is a pācittiya offense. Pouring anything
                      that would kill the beings into such water — or having it poured — is
                      also a pācittiya offense. (Pc 20)



                      Deliberately killing an animal — or having it killed — is a pācittiya
                      offense. (Pc 61)



                      Using water, or getting others to use it, knowing that it contains
                      living beings that will die from that use, is a pācittiya offense. (Pc
                      62)







                      share|improve this answer






























                        7














                        According to the Bhikkhu Patimokkha (quoted below), which are rules for monks, killing a human is grounds for immediate and irreversible dismissal from the monastic order (parajika).



                        However, deliberately killing an animal is an offense that requires only confession (pacittiya) within the monastic order, usually with the intention not to do it again. It's not as severe as killing a human.



                        If possible, change jobs or avoid doing the task of killing oysters. This is because killing oysters involves generating the unwholesome deliberate intention of taking a life. It's against the five precepts and Right Livelihood.



                        Also, don't carry remorse in your mind, which is unwholesome and unskillful. Confess it i.e. acknowledge that it's wrong then let it go. Don't hold on to it.




                        Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is
                        still a fetus — whether by killing the person, arranging for an
                        assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to die, or describing
                        the advantages of death — is a pārājika offense. (Pr 3)



                        Pouring water that one knows to contain living beings — or having it
                        poured — on grass or clay is a pācittiya offense. Pouring anything
                        that would kill the beings into such water — or having it poured — is
                        also a pācittiya offense. (Pc 20)



                        Deliberately killing an animal — or having it killed — is a pācittiya
                        offense. (Pc 61)



                        Using water, or getting others to use it, knowing that it contains
                        living beings that will die from that use, is a pācittiya offense. (Pc
                        62)







                        share|improve this answer




























                          7












                          7








                          7







                          According to the Bhikkhu Patimokkha (quoted below), which are rules for monks, killing a human is grounds for immediate and irreversible dismissal from the monastic order (parajika).



                          However, deliberately killing an animal is an offense that requires only confession (pacittiya) within the monastic order, usually with the intention not to do it again. It's not as severe as killing a human.



                          If possible, change jobs or avoid doing the task of killing oysters. This is because killing oysters involves generating the unwholesome deliberate intention of taking a life. It's against the five precepts and Right Livelihood.



                          Also, don't carry remorse in your mind, which is unwholesome and unskillful. Confess it i.e. acknowledge that it's wrong then let it go. Don't hold on to it.




                          Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is
                          still a fetus — whether by killing the person, arranging for an
                          assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to die, or describing
                          the advantages of death — is a pārājika offense. (Pr 3)



                          Pouring water that one knows to contain living beings — or having it
                          poured — on grass or clay is a pācittiya offense. Pouring anything
                          that would kill the beings into such water — or having it poured — is
                          also a pācittiya offense. (Pc 20)



                          Deliberately killing an animal — or having it killed — is a pācittiya
                          offense. (Pc 61)



                          Using water, or getting others to use it, knowing that it contains
                          living beings that will die from that use, is a pācittiya offense. (Pc
                          62)







                          share|improve this answer















                          According to the Bhikkhu Patimokkha (quoted below), which are rules for monks, killing a human is grounds for immediate and irreversible dismissal from the monastic order (parajika).



                          However, deliberately killing an animal is an offense that requires only confession (pacittiya) within the monastic order, usually with the intention not to do it again. It's not as severe as killing a human.



                          If possible, change jobs or avoid doing the task of killing oysters. This is because killing oysters involves generating the unwholesome deliberate intention of taking a life. It's against the five precepts and Right Livelihood.



                          Also, don't carry remorse in your mind, which is unwholesome and unskillful. Confess it i.e. acknowledge that it's wrong then let it go. Don't hold on to it.




                          Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is
                          still a fetus — whether by killing the person, arranging for an
                          assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to die, or describing
                          the advantages of death — is a pārājika offense. (Pr 3)



                          Pouring water that one knows to contain living beings — or having it
                          poured — on grass or clay is a pācittiya offense. Pouring anything
                          that would kill the beings into such water — or having it poured — is
                          also a pācittiya offense. (Pc 20)



                          Deliberately killing an animal — or having it killed — is a pācittiya
                          offense. (Pc 61)



                          Using water, or getting others to use it, knowing that it contains
                          living beings that will die from that use, is a pācittiya offense. (Pc
                          62)








                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Feb 23 at 10:33

























                          answered Feb 23 at 9:16









                          ruben2020ruben2020

                          15.9k31243




                          15.9k31243























                              5














                              Tell it your boss, simply "I observe the precept of not killing, not to encourage others and not to approve. It would be good if my person could take on tasks which do not involve such.", and simply abstain. Mental and future struggles from wrong doing are by far more hurtful and lasting then what ever hardship out of earn.



                              Not out of causes the Buddha told that aside of killing, involvment in business with meat or living beings, does not fit well for someone after long time happiness. And what ever gain, of cource needs to have it's sacrifies: why not letting go of what hurts?



                              [Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, but for release. For discussion and further question one is given to make use of this exit.]






                              share|improve this answer


























                              • I agree in principal with this as a possible action but would suggest that you think on changing the "Tell..." here to "Ask..."; and add, to the end, "Is there any way for you to accommodate me?" The employer might react better to this as a request for help but not react well if interpreted as a "demand". @Samana Johann if this was what you meant and was just a language issue with English, I apologize for misinterpreting. Regards.

                                – GVCOJims
                                Feb 28 at 20:01
















                              5














                              Tell it your boss, simply "I observe the precept of not killing, not to encourage others and not to approve. It would be good if my person could take on tasks which do not involve such.", and simply abstain. Mental and future struggles from wrong doing are by far more hurtful and lasting then what ever hardship out of earn.



                              Not out of causes the Buddha told that aside of killing, involvment in business with meat or living beings, does not fit well for someone after long time happiness. And what ever gain, of cource needs to have it's sacrifies: why not letting go of what hurts?



                              [Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, but for release. For discussion and further question one is given to make use of this exit.]






                              share|improve this answer


























                              • I agree in principal with this as a possible action but would suggest that you think on changing the "Tell..." here to "Ask..."; and add, to the end, "Is there any way for you to accommodate me?" The employer might react better to this as a request for help but not react well if interpreted as a "demand". @Samana Johann if this was what you meant and was just a language issue with English, I apologize for misinterpreting. Regards.

                                – GVCOJims
                                Feb 28 at 20:01














                              5












                              5








                              5







                              Tell it your boss, simply "I observe the precept of not killing, not to encourage others and not to approve. It would be good if my person could take on tasks which do not involve such.", and simply abstain. Mental and future struggles from wrong doing are by far more hurtful and lasting then what ever hardship out of earn.



                              Not out of causes the Buddha told that aside of killing, involvment in business with meat or living beings, does not fit well for someone after long time happiness. And what ever gain, of cource needs to have it's sacrifies: why not letting go of what hurts?



                              [Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, but for release. For discussion and further question one is given to make use of this exit.]






                              share|improve this answer















                              Tell it your boss, simply "I observe the precept of not killing, not to encourage others and not to approve. It would be good if my person could take on tasks which do not involve such.", and simply abstain. Mental and future struggles from wrong doing are by far more hurtful and lasting then what ever hardship out of earn.



                              Not out of causes the Buddha told that aside of killing, involvment in business with meat or living beings, does not fit well for someone after long time happiness. And what ever gain, of cource needs to have it's sacrifies: why not letting go of what hurts?



                              [Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, but for release. For discussion and further question one is given to make use of this exit.]







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited Feb 28 at 18:03









                              ChrisW

                              30.5k42486




                              30.5k42486










                              answered Feb 23 at 4:32









                              Samana JohannSamana Johann

                              592




                              592













                              • I agree in principal with this as a possible action but would suggest that you think on changing the "Tell..." here to "Ask..."; and add, to the end, "Is there any way for you to accommodate me?" The employer might react better to this as a request for help but not react well if interpreted as a "demand". @Samana Johann if this was what you meant and was just a language issue with English, I apologize for misinterpreting. Regards.

                                – GVCOJims
                                Feb 28 at 20:01



















                              • I agree in principal with this as a possible action but would suggest that you think on changing the "Tell..." here to "Ask..."; and add, to the end, "Is there any way for you to accommodate me?" The employer might react better to this as a request for help but not react well if interpreted as a "demand". @Samana Johann if this was what you meant and was just a language issue with English, I apologize for misinterpreting. Regards.

                                – GVCOJims
                                Feb 28 at 20:01

















                              I agree in principal with this as a possible action but would suggest that you think on changing the "Tell..." here to "Ask..."; and add, to the end, "Is there any way for you to accommodate me?" The employer might react better to this as a request for help but not react well if interpreted as a "demand". @Samana Johann if this was what you meant and was just a language issue with English, I apologize for misinterpreting. Regards.

                              – GVCOJims
                              Feb 28 at 20:01





                              I agree in principal with this as a possible action but would suggest that you think on changing the "Tell..." here to "Ask..."; and add, to the end, "Is there any way for you to accommodate me?" The employer might react better to this as a request for help but not react well if interpreted as a "demand". @Samana Johann if this was what you meant and was just a language issue with English, I apologize for misinterpreting. Regards.

                              – GVCOJims
                              Feb 28 at 20:01











                              1














                              Since you're not necessarily a Buddhist, I'll try to answer from a more vegan point of view although I'm not a vegan. You can only come to terms with this by telling your boss your beliefs and stopping. You can't continue to uphold vegan beliefs and kill animals. I know your financial situation is at stake but you don't want to be a hipocrite. There is a gentlemen I supervise who we excuse from killing bugs which is a function of his job, that we excuse because of his spiritual beliefs.






                              share|improve this answer
























                              • Good on you for understanding this person's dilemma. Regards.

                                – GVCOJims
                                Feb 28 at 22:25


















                              1














                              Since you're not necessarily a Buddhist, I'll try to answer from a more vegan point of view although I'm not a vegan. You can only come to terms with this by telling your boss your beliefs and stopping. You can't continue to uphold vegan beliefs and kill animals. I know your financial situation is at stake but you don't want to be a hipocrite. There is a gentlemen I supervise who we excuse from killing bugs which is a function of his job, that we excuse because of his spiritual beliefs.






                              share|improve this answer
























                              • Good on you for understanding this person's dilemma. Regards.

                                – GVCOJims
                                Feb 28 at 22:25
















                              1












                              1








                              1







                              Since you're not necessarily a Buddhist, I'll try to answer from a more vegan point of view although I'm not a vegan. You can only come to terms with this by telling your boss your beliefs and stopping. You can't continue to uphold vegan beliefs and kill animals. I know your financial situation is at stake but you don't want to be a hipocrite. There is a gentlemen I supervise who we excuse from killing bugs which is a function of his job, that we excuse because of his spiritual beliefs.






                              share|improve this answer













                              Since you're not necessarily a Buddhist, I'll try to answer from a more vegan point of view although I'm not a vegan. You can only come to terms with this by telling your boss your beliefs and stopping. You can't continue to uphold vegan beliefs and kill animals. I know your financial situation is at stake but you don't want to be a hipocrite. There is a gentlemen I supervise who we excuse from killing bugs which is a function of his job, that we excuse because of his spiritual beliefs.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Feb 24 at 6:46









                              m2015m2015

                              641511




                              641511













                              • Good on you for understanding this person's dilemma. Regards.

                                – GVCOJims
                                Feb 28 at 22:25





















                              • Good on you for understanding this person's dilemma. Regards.

                                – GVCOJims
                                Feb 28 at 22:25



















                              Good on you for understanding this person's dilemma. Regards.

                              – GVCOJims
                              Feb 28 at 22:25







                              Good on you for understanding this person's dilemma. Regards.

                              – GVCOJims
                              Feb 28 at 22:25




















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Buddhism Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31247%2fmy-job-requires-me-to-shuck-oysters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

                              When does type information flow backwards in C++?

                              Grease: Live!