$lim_{h to 0^+} frac{mathcal L (f^{-1}([x,x+h)))}{h}$ where $f^{-1}$ is the preimage of a Lipschitz function
$begingroup$
Motivated by the question Compute derivative of $g(x)=mathcal L({y in [a,b]: x >f(y)})$, I'd like to ask:
Let $f:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$. How can one compute the limit $$lim_{h to 0^+} frac{mathcal L(f^{-1}([x,x+h))}{h},$$
where $f^{-1}$ denotes the pre-image of $f$; $mathcal L$ the Lebesgue measure; and
assuming only that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous?
In the special case $f$ monotone, the question is much easier, since
$$f^{-1}([x,x+h)) = [f^{-1}(x), f^{-1}(x+h)).$$
real-analysis calculus functional-analysis measure-theory
asked Dec 22 '18 at 14:32
HiroHiro
194
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Motivated by the question Compute derivative of $g(x)=mathcal L({y in [a,b]: x >f(y)})$, I'd like to ask:
Let $f:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$. How can one compute the limit $$lim_{h to 0^+} frac{mathcal L(f^{-1}([x,x+h))}{h},$$
where $f^{-1}$ denotes the pre-image of $f$; $mathcal L$ the Lebesgue measure; and
assuming only that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous?
In the special case $f$ monotone, the question is much easier, since
$$f^{-1}([x,x+h)) = [f^{-1}(x), f^{-1}(x+h)).$$
real-analysis calculus functional-analysis measure-theory
asked Dec 22 '18 at 14:32
HiroHiro
194
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why is that not nonsense? Given a set A of real numbers and a nonzero h, what is A/h? If for all nonzero h, g(h) is a set of real numbers, what is the limit of g(h) as h approaches zero? What happens when h is negative?
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 3:31
1
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I ment the measure of the set, of course. There was a typo.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 23 '18 at 9:05
$begingroup$
Limit as h -> 0 indicates h can be positive or negative. For h < 0, [x,x+h) is empty, giving a liminf of 0. Thus, if there is a limit, it has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I've edited the question to address this ambiguity: we consider only $h to 0^+$.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 24 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@Hiro you are probably after Lebesgue differentiation theorem: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebesgue_differentiation_theorem
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 24 '18 at 0:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Motivated by the question Compute derivative of $g(x)=mathcal L({y in [a,b]: x >f(y)})$, I'd like to ask:
Let $f:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$. How can one compute the limit $$lim_{h to 0^+} frac{mathcal L(f^{-1}([x,x+h))}{h},$$
where $f^{-1}$ denotes the pre-image of $f$; $mathcal L$ the Lebesgue measure; and
assuming only that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous?
In the special case $f$ monotone, the question is much easier, since
$$f^{-1}([x,x+h)) = [f^{-1}(x), f^{-1}(x+h)).$$
real-analysis calculus functional-analysis measure-theory
asked Dec 22 '18 at 14:32
HiroHiro
194
$endgroup$
Motivated by the question Compute derivative of $g(x)=mathcal L({y in [a,b]: x >f(y)})$, I'd like to ask:
Let $f:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$. How can one compute the limit $$lim_{h to 0^+} frac{mathcal L(f^{-1}([x,x+h))}{h},$$
where $f^{-1}$ denotes the pre-image of $f$; $mathcal L$ the Lebesgue measure; and
assuming only that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous?
In the special case $f$ monotone, the question is much easier, since
$$f^{-1}([x,x+h)) = [f^{-1}(x), f^{-1}(x+h)).$$
real-analysis calculus functional-analysis measure-theory
real-analysis calculus functional-analysis measure-theory
asked Dec 22 '18 at 14:32
HiroHiro
194
asked Dec 22 '18 at 14:32
HiroHiro
194
edited Dec 24 '18 at 0:06
Hiro
asked Dec 22 '18 at 14:32
HiroHiro
194
asked Dec 22 '18 at 14:32
HiroHiro
194
asked Dec 22 '18 at 14:32
HiroHiro
194
194
$begingroup$
Why is that not nonsense? Given a set A of real numbers and a nonzero h, what is A/h? If for all nonzero h, g(h) is a set of real numbers, what is the limit of g(h) as h approaches zero? What happens when h is negative?
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 3:31
1
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I ment the measure of the set, of course. There was a typo.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 23 '18 at 9:05
$begingroup$
Limit as h -> 0 indicates h can be positive or negative. For h < 0, [x,x+h) is empty, giving a liminf of 0. Thus, if there is a limit, it has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I've edited the question to address this ambiguity: we consider only $h to 0^+$.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 24 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@Hiro you are probably after Lebesgue differentiation theorem: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebesgue_differentiation_theorem
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 24 '18 at 0:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why is that not nonsense? Given a set A of real numbers and a nonzero h, what is A/h? If for all nonzero h, g(h) is a set of real numbers, what is the limit of g(h) as h approaches zero? What happens when h is negative?
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 3:31
1
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I ment the measure of the set, of course. There was a typo.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 23 '18 at 9:05
$begingroup$
Limit as h -> 0 indicates h can be positive or negative. For h < 0, [x,x+h) is empty, giving a liminf of 0. Thus, if there is a limit, it has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I've edited the question to address this ambiguity: we consider only $h to 0^+$.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 24 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@Hiro you are probably after Lebesgue differentiation theorem: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebesgue_differentiation_theorem
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 24 '18 at 0:42
$begingroup$
Why is that not nonsense? Given a set A of real numbers and a nonzero h, what is A/h? If for all nonzero h, g(h) is a set of real numbers, what is the limit of g(h) as h approaches zero? What happens when h is negative?
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 3:31
$begingroup$
Why is that not nonsense? Given a set A of real numbers and a nonzero h, what is A/h? If for all nonzero h, g(h) is a set of real numbers, what is the limit of g(h) as h approaches zero? What happens when h is negative?
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 3:31
1
1
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I ment the measure of the set, of course. There was a typo.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 23 '18 at 9:05
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I ment the measure of the set, of course. There was a typo.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 23 '18 at 9:05
$begingroup$
Limit as h -> 0 indicates h can be positive or negative. For h < 0, [x,x+h) is empty, giving a liminf of 0. Thus, if there is a limit, it has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Limit as h -> 0 indicates h can be positive or negative. For h < 0, [x,x+h) is empty, giving a liminf of 0. Thus, if there is a limit, it has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I've edited the question to address this ambiguity: we consider only $h to 0^+$.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 24 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I've edited the question to address this ambiguity: we consider only $h to 0^+$.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 24 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@Hiro you are probably after Lebesgue differentiation theorem: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebesgue_differentiation_theorem
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 24 '18 at 0:42
$begingroup$
@Hiro you are probably after Lebesgue differentiation theorem: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebesgue_differentiation_theorem
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 24 '18 at 0:42
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049504%2flim-h-to-0-frac-mathcal-l-f-1x-xhh-where-f-1-is-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049504%2flim-h-to-0-frac-mathcal-l-f-1x-xhh-where-f-1-is-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Why is that not nonsense? Given a set A of real numbers and a nonzero h, what is A/h? If for all nonzero h, g(h) is a set of real numbers, what is the limit of g(h) as h approaches zero? What happens when h is negative?
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 3:31
1
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I ment the measure of the set, of course. There was a typo.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 23 '18 at 9:05
$begingroup$
Limit as h -> 0 indicates h can be positive or negative. For h < 0, [x,x+h) is empty, giving a liminf of 0. Thus, if there is a limit, it has to be zero.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Dec 23 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
@WilliamElliot I've edited the question to address this ambiguity: we consider only $h to 0^+$.
$endgroup$
– Hiro
Dec 24 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@Hiro you are probably after Lebesgue differentiation theorem: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebesgue_differentiation_theorem
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 24 '18 at 0:42