Why use indicator variables in p.d.f.s?
$begingroup$
I am slightly confused about the use of indicator variables in probability density functions.
For example, consider the density of $(X,Y)$ uniformly distributed on the unit disc. This density can be written as
$$f_{X,Y}(x,y)= frac{1}{pi} mathbb{1} left { (x,y) mid x^2 + y^2 leq 1 right }.$$
However, I am not really seeing how this makes sense. I understand indicator variables when solving problems with probability, but why not just write the density without it? What is it exactly saying?
Thanks in advance.
probability density-function
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am slightly confused about the use of indicator variables in probability density functions.
For example, consider the density of $(X,Y)$ uniformly distributed on the unit disc. This density can be written as
$$f_{X,Y}(x,y)= frac{1}{pi} mathbb{1} left { (x,y) mid x^2 + y^2 leq 1 right }.$$
However, I am not really seeing how this makes sense. I understand indicator variables when solving problems with probability, but why not just write the density without it? What is it exactly saying?
Thanks in advance.
probability density-function
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am slightly confused about the use of indicator variables in probability density functions.
For example, consider the density of $(X,Y)$ uniformly distributed on the unit disc. This density can be written as
$$f_{X,Y}(x,y)= frac{1}{pi} mathbb{1} left { (x,y) mid x^2 + y^2 leq 1 right }.$$
However, I am not really seeing how this makes sense. I understand indicator variables when solving problems with probability, but why not just write the density without it? What is it exactly saying?
Thanks in advance.
probability density-function
$endgroup$
I am slightly confused about the use of indicator variables in probability density functions.
For example, consider the density of $(X,Y)$ uniformly distributed on the unit disc. This density can be written as
$$f_{X,Y}(x,y)= frac{1}{pi} mathbb{1} left { (x,y) mid x^2 + y^2 leq 1 right }.$$
However, I am not really seeing how this makes sense. I understand indicator variables when solving problems with probability, but why not just write the density without it? What is it exactly saying?
Thanks in advance.
probability density-function
probability density-function
asked Dec 23 '18 at 9:11
MathIsLife12MathIsLife12
613211
613211
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that $f_{X,Y}:mathbb R^2tomathbb R$.
It says exactly that $f_{X,Y}(x,y)$ will take value $frac1{pi}$ if $x^2+y^2leq1$ and will take value $0$ otherwise.
So an excellent presentation of a PDF which is formally for a fixed nonnegative integer $n$ a nonnegative measurable function $mathbb R^ntomathbb R$ that gives value $1$ by integration wrt Lebesgue-measure.
In notation it can be handsome to write things like: $mathbb EX=int f_X(x)xdx$ without bothering on borders.
If it is not your taste then of course you can also choose for discerning cases: $x^2+y^2leq1$ and "otherwise" without any mentioning of indicatorfunction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050180%2fwhy-use-indicator-variables-in-p-d-f-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that $f_{X,Y}:mathbb R^2tomathbb R$.
It says exactly that $f_{X,Y}(x,y)$ will take value $frac1{pi}$ if $x^2+y^2leq1$ and will take value $0$ otherwise.
So an excellent presentation of a PDF which is formally for a fixed nonnegative integer $n$ a nonnegative measurable function $mathbb R^ntomathbb R$ that gives value $1$ by integration wrt Lebesgue-measure.
In notation it can be handsome to write things like: $mathbb EX=int f_X(x)xdx$ without bothering on borders.
If it is not your taste then of course you can also choose for discerning cases: $x^2+y^2leq1$ and "otherwise" without any mentioning of indicatorfunction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that $f_{X,Y}:mathbb R^2tomathbb R$.
It says exactly that $f_{X,Y}(x,y)$ will take value $frac1{pi}$ if $x^2+y^2leq1$ and will take value $0$ otherwise.
So an excellent presentation of a PDF which is formally for a fixed nonnegative integer $n$ a nonnegative measurable function $mathbb R^ntomathbb R$ that gives value $1$ by integration wrt Lebesgue-measure.
In notation it can be handsome to write things like: $mathbb EX=int f_X(x)xdx$ without bothering on borders.
If it is not your taste then of course you can also choose for discerning cases: $x^2+y^2leq1$ and "otherwise" without any mentioning of indicatorfunction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that $f_{X,Y}:mathbb R^2tomathbb R$.
It says exactly that $f_{X,Y}(x,y)$ will take value $frac1{pi}$ if $x^2+y^2leq1$ and will take value $0$ otherwise.
So an excellent presentation of a PDF which is formally for a fixed nonnegative integer $n$ a nonnegative measurable function $mathbb R^ntomathbb R$ that gives value $1$ by integration wrt Lebesgue-measure.
In notation it can be handsome to write things like: $mathbb EX=int f_X(x)xdx$ without bothering on borders.
If it is not your taste then of course you can also choose for discerning cases: $x^2+y^2leq1$ and "otherwise" without any mentioning of indicatorfunction.
$endgroup$
Note that $f_{X,Y}:mathbb R^2tomathbb R$.
It says exactly that $f_{X,Y}(x,y)$ will take value $frac1{pi}$ if $x^2+y^2leq1$ and will take value $0$ otherwise.
So an excellent presentation of a PDF which is formally for a fixed nonnegative integer $n$ a nonnegative measurable function $mathbb R^ntomathbb R$ that gives value $1$ by integration wrt Lebesgue-measure.
In notation it can be handsome to write things like: $mathbb EX=int f_X(x)xdx$ without bothering on borders.
If it is not your taste then of course you can also choose for discerning cases: $x^2+y^2leq1$ and "otherwise" without any mentioning of indicatorfunction.
edited Dec 23 '18 at 9:28
answered Dec 23 '18 at 9:21
drhabdrhab
103k545136
103k545136
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050180%2fwhy-use-indicator-variables-in-p-d-f-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown