Is there a name for this series?
$begingroup$
I am doing a presentation on nonlinear optics and I ran into a paper that uses a series to describe a wave equation of a system. The paper will be linked below and the series is:
$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n$
I mostly am looking for what i should call this other than "series." The equations are presented on pg. 1-2, eqns. 1a, 1b, and 1c (all are the same thing for 3 different waves).
http://www.few.vu.nl/~switte/papers/OPCPA_review_published_early_edition.pdf
EDIT: The full equation is
$frac{partial A}{partial z}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n frac{partial^{n} A}{partial t^{n}}=-i frac{chi^{(2)}omega}{2nc}AA^{*}e^{-iDelta textbf{k}cdot textbf{z}}$
so it may just be simpler to discuss it in terms of what each portion does rather than by mathematical terminology..
sequences-and-series power-series
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I am doing a presentation on nonlinear optics and I ran into a paper that uses a series to describe a wave equation of a system. The paper will be linked below and the series is:
$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n$
I mostly am looking for what i should call this other than "series." The equations are presented on pg. 1-2, eqns. 1a, 1b, and 1c (all are the same thing for 3 different waves).
http://www.few.vu.nl/~switte/papers/OPCPA_review_published_early_edition.pdf
EDIT: The full equation is
$frac{partial A}{partial z}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n frac{partial^{n} A}{partial t^{n}}=-i frac{chi^{(2)}omega}{2nc}AA^{*}e^{-iDelta textbf{k}cdot textbf{z}}$
so it may just be simpler to discuss it in terms of what each portion does rather than by mathematical terminology..
sequences-and-series power-series
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
After checking the paper, the formula is much more complicated than that. Voting to close.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:19
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Should I delete the question instead?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:54
$begingroup$
You still have the option of updating the question to ask for clarification about the formula.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:56
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Is that edit sufficient, or should I add any other information?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 15:11
$begingroup$
$^{(n)}$, not $^n$ !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:25
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I am doing a presentation on nonlinear optics and I ran into a paper that uses a series to describe a wave equation of a system. The paper will be linked below and the series is:
$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n$
I mostly am looking for what i should call this other than "series." The equations are presented on pg. 1-2, eqns. 1a, 1b, and 1c (all are the same thing for 3 different waves).
http://www.few.vu.nl/~switte/papers/OPCPA_review_published_early_edition.pdf
EDIT: The full equation is
$frac{partial A}{partial z}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n frac{partial^{n} A}{partial t^{n}}=-i frac{chi^{(2)}omega}{2nc}AA^{*}e^{-iDelta textbf{k}cdot textbf{z}}$
so it may just be simpler to discuss it in terms of what each portion does rather than by mathematical terminology..
sequences-and-series power-series
$endgroup$
I am doing a presentation on nonlinear optics and I ran into a paper that uses a series to describe a wave equation of a system. The paper will be linked below and the series is:
$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n$
I mostly am looking for what i should call this other than "series." The equations are presented on pg. 1-2, eqns. 1a, 1b, and 1c (all are the same thing for 3 different waves).
http://www.few.vu.nl/~switte/papers/OPCPA_review_published_early_edition.pdf
EDIT: The full equation is
$frac{partial A}{partial z}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n frac{partial^{n} A}{partial t^{n}}=-i frac{chi^{(2)}omega}{2nc}AA^{*}e^{-iDelta textbf{k}cdot textbf{z}}$
so it may just be simpler to discuss it in terms of what each portion does rather than by mathematical terminology..
sequences-and-series power-series
sequences-and-series power-series
edited Feb 22 at 15:10
celani99
asked Feb 22 at 13:52
celani99celani99
173
173
1
$begingroup$
After checking the paper, the formula is much more complicated than that. Voting to close.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:19
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Should I delete the question instead?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:54
$begingroup$
You still have the option of updating the question to ask for clarification about the formula.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:56
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Is that edit sufficient, or should I add any other information?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 15:11
$begingroup$
$^{(n)}$, not $^n$ !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:25
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
After checking the paper, the formula is much more complicated than that. Voting to close.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:19
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Should I delete the question instead?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:54
$begingroup$
You still have the option of updating the question to ask for clarification about the formula.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:56
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Is that edit sufficient, or should I add any other information?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 15:11
$begingroup$
$^{(n)}$, not $^n$ !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:25
1
1
$begingroup$
After checking the paper, the formula is much more complicated than that. Voting to close.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:19
$begingroup$
After checking the paper, the formula is much more complicated than that. Voting to close.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:19
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Should I delete the question instead?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:54
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Should I delete the question instead?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:54
$begingroup$
You still have the option of updating the question to ask for clarification about the formula.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:56
$begingroup$
You still have the option of updating the question to ask for clarification about the formula.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:56
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Is that edit sufficient, or should I add any other information?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Is that edit sufficient, or should I add any other information?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 15:11
$begingroup$
$^{(n)}$, not $^n$ !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:25
$begingroup$
$^{(n)}$, not $^n$ !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:25
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac{(-ik)^n}{(-i),n!}=i(e^{-ik}-1)=i(cos k-1-isin k).$$
This can be rewritten as
$$2icosfrac k2left(cosfrac k2-isinfrac k2right)=2icosfrac k2e^{-ik/2}$$ but there is little benefit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n=sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{(-i)(-i)^{n-1}}{(-i)n!}k^n=frac{1}{-i}sumlimits_{n=1}^inftyfrac{(-i)^n}{n!}k^n=i(e^{-ik}-1).$$ So I would say yes it is known and there is a name for it -- exponential function.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Whyever this got a downvote... If you are not satisfied with the answer, you should comment and tell me what is wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– James
Feb 22 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@celani99 I saw the OPCPA article, are you sure $k^n=k^{(n)}$? "The k(n) - terms are the nth order dispersion coefficients of the medium" I think k is depends on somehow from n.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
@JV.Stalker, I think you are correct. The series I posted should be $k^{(n)}$, sorry.
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:48
4
$begingroup$
Isn't it $e^{-ik}$ rather than $e^k$?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Feb 22 at 15:44
$begingroup$
@Acccumulation: amazing so many people upvoted without noticing.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think the name of the function is "Exponential generating function (EGF)" see Wikipedia.
$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty ik_n frac{(-i)^n}{n!}=EGF(ik_n,-i)-ik(0)$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The formula in the question is with $k^n$, not $k_n$. And that in the paper is with $k^{(n)}$, which is quite different.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:57
1
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust, you are right, I am just would have liked to help to celani99.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 15:04
$begingroup$
No, this is like saying that the name of the function $cos$ is "trigonometric function". Exponential generating functions are just a type of generating function. These are a collection of methods for manipulating series by treating the terms of the series as coefficients in something like a Taylor series and then manipulating the function represented by that series, instead of the original series of numbers.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Feb 22 at 16:01
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby I guess you are right, but don't be too hard on JV. Recognizing this as an EGF could be useful in the process of identifying the function, just like noticing that something is a trigonometric function can be useful in precisely determining which function it is.
$endgroup$
– Tempestas Ludi
Feb 22 at 16:48
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3122612%2fis-there-a-name-for-this-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac{(-ik)^n}{(-i),n!}=i(e^{-ik}-1)=i(cos k-1-isin k).$$
This can be rewritten as
$$2icosfrac k2left(cosfrac k2-isinfrac k2right)=2icosfrac k2e^{-ik/2}$$ but there is little benefit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac{(-ik)^n}{(-i),n!}=i(e^{-ik}-1)=i(cos k-1-isin k).$$
This can be rewritten as
$$2icosfrac k2left(cosfrac k2-isinfrac k2right)=2icosfrac k2e^{-ik/2}$$ but there is little benefit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac{(-ik)^n}{(-i),n!}=i(e^{-ik}-1)=i(cos k-1-isin k).$$
This can be rewritten as
$$2icosfrac k2left(cosfrac k2-isinfrac k2right)=2icosfrac k2e^{-ik/2}$$ but there is little benefit.
$endgroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac{(-ik)^n}{(-i),n!}=i(e^{-ik}-1)=i(cos k-1-isin k).$$
This can be rewritten as
$$2icosfrac k2left(cosfrac k2-isinfrac k2right)=2icosfrac k2e^{-ik/2}$$ but there is little benefit.
edited Feb 22 at 14:58
answered Feb 22 at 14:10
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
131k676229
131k676229
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n=sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{(-i)(-i)^{n-1}}{(-i)n!}k^n=frac{1}{-i}sumlimits_{n=1}^inftyfrac{(-i)^n}{n!}k^n=i(e^{-ik}-1).$$ So I would say yes it is known and there is a name for it -- exponential function.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Whyever this got a downvote... If you are not satisfied with the answer, you should comment and tell me what is wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– James
Feb 22 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@celani99 I saw the OPCPA article, are you sure $k^n=k^{(n)}$? "The k(n) - terms are the nth order dispersion coefficients of the medium" I think k is depends on somehow from n.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
@JV.Stalker, I think you are correct. The series I posted should be $k^{(n)}$, sorry.
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:48
4
$begingroup$
Isn't it $e^{-ik}$ rather than $e^k$?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Feb 22 at 15:44
$begingroup$
@Acccumulation: amazing so many people upvoted without noticing.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n=sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{(-i)(-i)^{n-1}}{(-i)n!}k^n=frac{1}{-i}sumlimits_{n=1}^inftyfrac{(-i)^n}{n!}k^n=i(e^{-ik}-1).$$ So I would say yes it is known and there is a name for it -- exponential function.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Whyever this got a downvote... If you are not satisfied with the answer, you should comment and tell me what is wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– James
Feb 22 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@celani99 I saw the OPCPA article, are you sure $k^n=k^{(n)}$? "The k(n) - terms are the nth order dispersion coefficients of the medium" I think k is depends on somehow from n.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
@JV.Stalker, I think you are correct. The series I posted should be $k^{(n)}$, sorry.
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:48
4
$begingroup$
Isn't it $e^{-ik}$ rather than $e^k$?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Feb 22 at 15:44
$begingroup$
@Acccumulation: amazing so many people upvoted without noticing.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n=sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{(-i)(-i)^{n-1}}{(-i)n!}k^n=frac{1}{-i}sumlimits_{n=1}^inftyfrac{(-i)^n}{n!}k^n=i(e^{-ik}-1).$$ So I would say yes it is known and there is a name for it -- exponential function.
$endgroup$
$$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{(-i)^{n-1}}{n!}k^n=sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{(-i)(-i)^{n-1}}{(-i)n!}k^n=frac{1}{-i}sumlimits_{n=1}^inftyfrac{(-i)^n}{n!}k^n=i(e^{-ik}-1).$$ So I would say yes it is known and there is a name for it -- exponential function.
edited Feb 23 at 8:43
answered Feb 22 at 13:58
JamesJames
2,113422
2,113422
1
$begingroup$
Whyever this got a downvote... If you are not satisfied with the answer, you should comment and tell me what is wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– James
Feb 22 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@celani99 I saw the OPCPA article, are you sure $k^n=k^{(n)}$? "The k(n) - terms are the nth order dispersion coefficients of the medium" I think k is depends on somehow from n.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
@JV.Stalker, I think you are correct. The series I posted should be $k^{(n)}$, sorry.
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:48
4
$begingroup$
Isn't it $e^{-ik}$ rather than $e^k$?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Feb 22 at 15:44
$begingroup$
@Acccumulation: amazing so many people upvoted without noticing.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:48
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Whyever this got a downvote... If you are not satisfied with the answer, you should comment and tell me what is wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– James
Feb 22 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@celani99 I saw the OPCPA article, are you sure $k^n=k^{(n)}$? "The k(n) - terms are the nth order dispersion coefficients of the medium" I think k is depends on somehow from n.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
@JV.Stalker, I think you are correct. The series I posted should be $k^{(n)}$, sorry.
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:48
4
$begingroup$
Isn't it $e^{-ik}$ rather than $e^k$?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Feb 22 at 15:44
$begingroup$
@Acccumulation: amazing so many people upvoted without noticing.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:48
1
1
$begingroup$
Whyever this got a downvote... If you are not satisfied with the answer, you should comment and tell me what is wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– James
Feb 22 at 14:06
$begingroup$
Whyever this got a downvote... If you are not satisfied with the answer, you should comment and tell me what is wrong with it.
$endgroup$
– James
Feb 22 at 14:06
$begingroup$
@celani99 I saw the OPCPA article, are you sure $k^n=k^{(n)}$? "The k(n) - terms are the nth order dispersion coefficients of the medium" I think k is depends on somehow from n.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
@celani99 I saw the OPCPA article, are you sure $k^n=k^{(n)}$? "The k(n) - terms are the nth order dispersion coefficients of the medium" I think k is depends on somehow from n.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
@JV.Stalker, I think you are correct. The series I posted should be $k^{(n)}$, sorry.
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:48
$begingroup$
@JV.Stalker, I think you are correct. The series I posted should be $k^{(n)}$, sorry.
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:48
4
4
$begingroup$
Isn't it $e^{-ik}$ rather than $e^k$?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Feb 22 at 15:44
$begingroup$
Isn't it $e^{-ik}$ rather than $e^k$?
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
Feb 22 at 15:44
$begingroup$
@Acccumulation: amazing so many people upvoted without noticing.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:48
$begingroup$
@Acccumulation: amazing so many people upvoted without noticing.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think the name of the function is "Exponential generating function (EGF)" see Wikipedia.
$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty ik_n frac{(-i)^n}{n!}=EGF(ik_n,-i)-ik(0)$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The formula in the question is with $k^n$, not $k_n$. And that in the paper is with $k^{(n)}$, which is quite different.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:57
1
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust, you are right, I am just would have liked to help to celani99.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 15:04
$begingroup$
No, this is like saying that the name of the function $cos$ is "trigonometric function". Exponential generating functions are just a type of generating function. These are a collection of methods for manipulating series by treating the terms of the series as coefficients in something like a Taylor series and then manipulating the function represented by that series, instead of the original series of numbers.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Feb 22 at 16:01
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby I guess you are right, but don't be too hard on JV. Recognizing this as an EGF could be useful in the process of identifying the function, just like noticing that something is a trigonometric function can be useful in precisely determining which function it is.
$endgroup$
– Tempestas Ludi
Feb 22 at 16:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think the name of the function is "Exponential generating function (EGF)" see Wikipedia.
$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty ik_n frac{(-i)^n}{n!}=EGF(ik_n,-i)-ik(0)$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The formula in the question is with $k^n$, not $k_n$. And that in the paper is with $k^{(n)}$, which is quite different.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:57
1
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust, you are right, I am just would have liked to help to celani99.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 15:04
$begingroup$
No, this is like saying that the name of the function $cos$ is "trigonometric function". Exponential generating functions are just a type of generating function. These are a collection of methods for manipulating series by treating the terms of the series as coefficients in something like a Taylor series and then manipulating the function represented by that series, instead of the original series of numbers.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Feb 22 at 16:01
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby I guess you are right, but don't be too hard on JV. Recognizing this as an EGF could be useful in the process of identifying the function, just like noticing that something is a trigonometric function can be useful in precisely determining which function it is.
$endgroup$
– Tempestas Ludi
Feb 22 at 16:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think the name of the function is "Exponential generating function (EGF)" see Wikipedia.
$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty ik_n frac{(-i)^n}{n!}=EGF(ik_n,-i)-ik(0)$
$endgroup$
Think the name of the function is "Exponential generating function (EGF)" see Wikipedia.
$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty ik_n frac{(-i)^n}{n!}=EGF(ik_n,-i)-ik(0)$
edited Feb 22 at 14:57
answered Feb 22 at 14:51
JV.StalkerJV.Stalker
93349
93349
1
$begingroup$
The formula in the question is with $k^n$, not $k_n$. And that in the paper is with $k^{(n)}$, which is quite different.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:57
1
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust, you are right, I am just would have liked to help to celani99.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 15:04
$begingroup$
No, this is like saying that the name of the function $cos$ is "trigonometric function". Exponential generating functions are just a type of generating function. These are a collection of methods for manipulating series by treating the terms of the series as coefficients in something like a Taylor series and then manipulating the function represented by that series, instead of the original series of numbers.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Feb 22 at 16:01
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby I guess you are right, but don't be too hard on JV. Recognizing this as an EGF could be useful in the process of identifying the function, just like noticing that something is a trigonometric function can be useful in precisely determining which function it is.
$endgroup$
– Tempestas Ludi
Feb 22 at 16:48
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The formula in the question is with $k^n$, not $k_n$. And that in the paper is with $k^{(n)}$, which is quite different.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:57
1
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust, you are right, I am just would have liked to help to celani99.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 15:04
$begingroup$
No, this is like saying that the name of the function $cos$ is "trigonometric function". Exponential generating functions are just a type of generating function. These are a collection of methods for manipulating series by treating the terms of the series as coefficients in something like a Taylor series and then manipulating the function represented by that series, instead of the original series of numbers.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Feb 22 at 16:01
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby I guess you are right, but don't be too hard on JV. Recognizing this as an EGF could be useful in the process of identifying the function, just like noticing that something is a trigonometric function can be useful in precisely determining which function it is.
$endgroup$
– Tempestas Ludi
Feb 22 at 16:48
1
1
$begingroup$
The formula in the question is with $k^n$, not $k_n$. And that in the paper is with $k^{(n)}$, which is quite different.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:57
$begingroup$
The formula in the question is with $k^n$, not $k_n$. And that in the paper is with $k^{(n)}$, which is quite different.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:57
1
1
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust, you are right, I am just would have liked to help to celani99.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 15:04
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust, you are right, I am just would have liked to help to celani99.
$endgroup$
– JV.Stalker
Feb 22 at 15:04
$begingroup$
No, this is like saying that the name of the function $cos$ is "trigonometric function". Exponential generating functions are just a type of generating function. These are a collection of methods for manipulating series by treating the terms of the series as coefficients in something like a Taylor series and then manipulating the function represented by that series, instead of the original series of numbers.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Feb 22 at 16:01
$begingroup$
No, this is like saying that the name of the function $cos$ is "trigonometric function". Exponential generating functions are just a type of generating function. These are a collection of methods for manipulating series by treating the terms of the series as coefficients in something like a Taylor series and then manipulating the function represented by that series, instead of the original series of numbers.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Feb 22 at 16:01
1
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby I guess you are right, but don't be too hard on JV. Recognizing this as an EGF could be useful in the process of identifying the function, just like noticing that something is a trigonometric function can be useful in precisely determining which function it is.
$endgroup$
– Tempestas Ludi
Feb 22 at 16:48
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby I guess you are right, but don't be too hard on JV. Recognizing this as an EGF could be useful in the process of identifying the function, just like noticing that something is a trigonometric function can be useful in precisely determining which function it is.
$endgroup$
– Tempestas Ludi
Feb 22 at 16:48
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3122612%2fis-there-a-name-for-this-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
After checking the paper, the formula is much more complicated than that. Voting to close.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:19
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Should I delete the question instead?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 14:54
$begingroup$
You still have the option of updating the question to ask for clarification about the formula.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 14:56
$begingroup$
@YvesDaoust Is that edit sufficient, or should I add any other information?
$endgroup$
– celani99
Feb 22 at 15:11
$begingroup$
$^{(n)}$, not $^n$ !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Feb 22 at 16:25